Top Banner
The CKOV support By P Lau
16

The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Dec 21, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

The CKOV support

By P Lau

Page 2: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF0

Beam line

3

Page 3: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

10

Space take up for the combined Cherenkov & TOF0

Page 4: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Requirements1. Accessibility for maintenance for both CKOV1 and TOF0 on both sides of the beam line

2. Vertical and transverse remote adjustments to center on the beam

Typically ~ +/- 5 cm horizontally and vertically

3. As much longitudinal free space as possible for safety purposes (rescue via crane in case of emergency)

Proposal from meeting (PD, WL, GG) at RAL on May 3-4

Movable platform + 10 /- 30 cm horizontally

+/- 5 cm vertically

Max load = 1 ton 4

Page 5: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

2 proposals for CKOV support

Proposal A• Table size 1,820 (W) mm x

1,010 (D) mm

Proposal B• Table size is 1,400 (W) mm x

1,120 (D) mm

Page 6: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal A - Isotropic View

Page 7: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal A - The left most position in X direction

Page 8: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal A - The right most position of the table in X-direction

Page 9: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal A - End View

Page 10: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal A – The Top View

Page 11: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal B- Isotropic View

Page 12: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal B – the left most position in X - direction

Page 13: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal B- the right most position in X - direction

Page 14: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal B - the end view

Page 15: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Proposal B – The Top View

Page 16: The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

Comment on Proposal A and B

1. More material, heavier in weight

2. No walk way between the wall shield and CKOV support

3. No one could get into the CKOV support area, can be argued as preventive from accident inside the CKOV support

4. Distance between the tracker and the front side of TOF0 is 405 mm

1. Less material

2. About 280 mm gap between the shield wall and CKOV support

3. In case of anyone falls down inside the CKOV support area, should have enough space to get him/her out

4. Distance between the tracker and the front side of TOF0 is 366 mm