Top Banner
The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence- Based Management Through Case Competition Tina Saksida R. Blake Jelley University of Prince Edward Island Edward N. Gamble Montana State University 2015 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
7

The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

Aug 18, 2015

Download

Education

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based

Management Through Case Competition

Tina SaksidaR. Blake Jelley

University of Prince Edward Island

Edward N. GambleMontana State University

2015 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management

Page 2: The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

EBMgt and the Case Method

• EBMgt education central to the development of EBMgt in practice– EBMgt currently featured in relatively few MBA

courses (Charlier et al., 2011)

• The case method– Traditional, almost taken-for-granted part of

management education (Mesny, 2013)– Benefits and criticism of case-based instruction

• Alternative: Case-based approach and EBMgt

Page 3: The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

Case Competitions

• Typical case competition– Benefits to business students– Limitations

• Opportunities for improvement –More explicit and frequent use of EBMgt

in competitions• EBMgt as the cornerstone for case

competition logistics, case selection, student preparation, judging calibration, and evaluation criteria

Page 4: The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

EBMgt Case Competition

• Purpose of the competition– Impact student learning and development– Promote the EBMgt approach to stakeholders

• Tentative competition structure– Written preliminary case– Three stages for top teams at competition

venue– Access to evidence-informed models– Access to library databases and search engines

• Searching for evidence vs. using popularized business tools (e.g., SWOT, Porter, 4Ps, etc.)

Page 5: The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

EBMgt Case Competition

• Writing or selecting cases– Explicitly incorporate the four components of

EBMgt

• Judging and the evaluation rubric – Selection and training of judges– Rubrics carefully aligned with EBMgt principles

• Preparing students– Training phases and distributed training schedule

• Progressive transfer of problem-solving responsibility

– Student performance feedback– Institutional buy-in

Page 6: The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

Benefits of EBMgt Case Competition

• Student learning and development– EBMgt mind- and skill-set– Critical thinking– Meeting student preference for “enjoyable”

instruction

• Publicity– Awareness of EBMgt among competition

stakeholders

• Opportunity to develop new EBMgt materials– E.g., handbook of EBMgt case analysis

• Potential data collection source for researchers

Page 7: The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition

PDW Discussion

• Feasibility of EBMgt case competition

• Challenging the status quo• EBMgt case competition logistics• Judging EBMgt case competitions