Top Banner
The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014
17

The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

Jan 17, 2018

Download

Documents

Martin Hall

3 Review Develop an updated CV format that allows faculty greater flexibility to represent the full range of their academic accomplishments Provide feedback and guidance on functionality for uploading/editing the CV Determine and maintain a standard CV format to provide efficiency for faculty reviewers Represent your constituencies during the revision process Advocate for the CV Module we develop
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

The Advance CV WorkgroupThe Advance CV Workgroup

November 17, 2014

Page 2: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

2

• Review• Ideas discussed• Mock ups• Section by Section Analysis

Agenda

Page 3: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

3

Review• Develop an updated CV format that allows

faculty greater flexibility to represent the full range of their academic accomplishments

• Provide feedback and guidance on functionality for uploading/editing the CV

• Determine and maintain a standard CV format to provide efficiency for faculty reviewers

• Represent your constituencies during the revision process

• Advocate for the CV Module we develop

Page 4: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

4

• Allow user to add a text field at the end of each section for additional information

• Allow Reviewers to sort Packet CV entries– Save sort option; apply it to that reviewer’s CVs

• Allow users to create/save multiple versions (like the NIH Biosketch)

• In the Packet/Review CV, do not display empty section headers

• Enable export of a Packet/Review CV

Ideas discussed

Page 5: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

5

• Change section header roll-overs to– Add an example to the roll-over text

• Import process:– Provide a list of possible issues to the user– Do not fill in End Date if there is no end date

• Update the rules related to the review CV so Service Centers can help faculty understand how to organize their CV

• Additional ideas: – Add a “sticky button” for filtering the Review CV– Restrict import after first review

Ideas discussed

Page 6: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

6

Mock ups – sort review CV

Page 7: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

7

Mock ups – sort review CV

Page 8: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

8

Mock ups – multiple CVs

Additional CVsCreate New CV

Page 9: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

9

Mock ups – multiple CVs

Additional CVs

PNAS 2014

Page 10: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

Mock ups – multiple CVs

Additional CVsCreate New CVPNAS 2014Genentech

Page 11: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

11

Mock ups – info roll-over

Page 12: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

12

Mock ups – info roll-over

Page 13: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

13

Mock ups – sticky filter

Page 14: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

14

Mock ups – sticky filter

Page 15: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

15

The CV Redesign ProcessSection by Section analysis

– The content perspective• Does the structure of this section allow the user to tell

their story?– Ideas: sub-sections, new sections, etc.

– The functionality perspective• Is this section easy to use, modify, export?

– Ideas: sort options, moving things around, filters, etc.• Is it easy to create a CV for different purposes?

– The academic review perspective• Can a reviewer easily find what’s needed to evaluate

academic accomplishments?– Ideas: Required vs Optional sections; “Do you need this?” “Does

this help you evaluate the academic accomplishments?”

Page 16: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

16

Section by Section AnalysisDEMO

Page 17: The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014.

17

The Advance CV• Other topics that need to be discussed:

– Rich Text fields• Rich Text enables bold, underline, italics, formatting

tricks like bullets, indents, hanging indents, etc.• Opens “paste” process to introduce unwanted code• Can we “strip” rich text when pasting, forcing the user

to add formatting using the rich text tool?– Sharing your data

• Default is NOT to share data – user can enable sharing• Do we want system-defined access to some data?

– “Granularity” of fields• Original design considered sorting and reporting• Do we need more granularity?