This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
PREPARED BY FSS INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ADVISORY SECURITIES CO LTD (FSSIA). ANALYST CERTIFICATION AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES CAN BE FOUND AT THE END OF THIS REPORT
The second way to reduce battery costs is to change the metallic material used to coat
the cathode from NMC to other materials. In most types of batteries used today,
besides lithium which is a base material for any Li-ion battery, nickel is the most
common material used to produce the battery coating, followed by cobalt and
manganese.
Exhibit 19: Nickel price Exhibit 20: Cobalt price
Source: Bloomberg
Source: Bloomberg
However, due to the much higher cost of cobalt than other materials, which is currently
at USD32,000/tonne for cobalt, 2x higher than the price of nickel at USD16,000/tonne
and 16x higher than the price of manganese at USD2,000/tonne as of January 2021,
the cobalt cost is the largest material cost to produce Li-ion batteries. Hence, we think
NMC-based batteries with an NMC ratio of 8:1:1 will remain the formula for NMC
batteries over the next several years before any technological breakthrough in battery
production, material science, and technology could challenge EA‟s existing NMC
battery.
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
2,600
2,800
3,000
2017 2018 2019 2020
(USD/t) Manganese - China
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
2017 2018 2019 2020
(USD/t)
Steel Sheet - China Domestic Cold Rolled
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
2017 2018 2019 2020
(USD/t) Nickel -LME
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
2017 2018 2019 2020
(USD/t) Cobalt - LME
THAILAND UTILITIES Suwat Sinsadok
10 FINANSIA
Semi-solid state battery technology – GPSC’s core battery. On 25 December
2020, GPSC announced that the company will start the construction of its energy
storage unit production plant in Thailand using semi-solid technology. The battery
plant, located in the Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate in Rayong province, has an
investment cost of THB1.1b with an initial capacity of 30MWh.
According to GPSC‟s management, this plant is the first step in its growth strategy to
create a new business for S-curve growth. GPSC‟s semi-solid battery cells in Thailand
will be called “G-Cell” and the battery production plant is expected to commence its
COD in 2Q21. The target market will be for mobility and stationary purposes and will
be supplied to industrial plants, charging stations and transportation businesses such
as EV Tuk-Tuks and E-buses.
Exhibit 21: GPSC’s semi-solid state battery Exhibit 22: Semi-solid battery
Source: GPSC
Source: GPSC
According to GPSC‟s management, the company expects that its innovative LIB
battery “G-Cell” using the semi-solid state (gel) or solid state (glass) as a key
electrolyte, rather than the conventional liquid-based electrolyte used in NMC and
LFP-based batteries, could enhance the performance of its battery via 1) reducing the
risk of short circuits or “dendrites” – the automatic melting of cathodes and anodes that
result in a short circuit – by allowing the cathodes and anodes to be closer to each
other and thereby increase the number of battery cells for greater energy density; and
2) lower material costs by changing from lithium to sodium.
GPSC plans to start the operation of its 30MWh pilot semi-solid battery plant in 2Q21
and could later ramp it up to 100MWh if the functionality and reliability of its G-Cell can
be achieved at a commercially safe level, which we think could take at least 2-3 years.
Exhibit 23: Simplified structure of Lithium-ion battery Exhibit 24: Comparison of battery structure (liquid vs solid state)
Source: GPSC
Source: GPSC
THAILAND UTILITIES Suwat Sinsadok
11 FINANSIA
Battery cost is key
According to BloombergNEF (BNEF), a research organization focusing on clean
energy, advanced transportation, digital industry, innovative materials and
commodities, the demand for batteries is projected to rise sharply during 2020-25,
mainly from EVs, with small chunk of demand from consumer and stationary storage
segments.
Exhibit 25: Projected battery cost for Li-ion batteries Exhibit 26: Projected demand for batteries in consumer electronic products and EVs vs battery price projection
Source: BloombergNEF
Source: BloombergNEF
Thanks to the looming demand explosion, BNEF projects that the price of a battery
pack will decline from USD137/kWh in 2020, a 13% y-y drop, down to only
USD94/kWh in 2024 and USD62/kWh in 2030, based on an average 18% learning
rate of cost reduction, which is in line with the historical annual average cost reduction
of 19% CAGR in 2010-20.
Exhibit 27: Price of an Li-ion battery pack, volume-weighted average – real 2020 USD per kWh
Exhibit 28: Cost of battery cells and packs
Source: BloombergNEF
Source: BloombergNEF
BNEF also projects that the cost for batteries made in Thailand will be competitive with
other major battery producers, thanks to certain companies‟ first-mover and proven
technological advantages, the strong demand for batteries from the power and
automotive industries, and the timely and effective incentive packages for investment,
including packages related to the EEC, the BOI, and lower excise taxes for EVs.
THAILAND UTILITIES Suwat Sinsadok
12 FINANSIA
Our projected battery prices for EA and GPSC. We believe EA‟s battery cost will be
competitive at USD165/kWh when it starts to produce the NMC-based batteries from
its 1GWh first phase battery plant in 2Q21. If we include the other costs like
packaging, we estimate that EA‟s selling price for its batteries could start at
USD200/kWh in 2021 and then gradually decline to 185/kWh in 2026, driven by lower
production costs and the economies of scales.
For GPSC, we estimate that the production cost of its G-Cell semi-solid state battery
will be USD300/kWh once it commences the COD of its 30MWh (3% of EA‟s 1GWh
capacity) plant in 2Q21. We project that the production cost will drop to USD120/kWh
The disclosure of the survey results of the Thai Institute of Directors Association („IOD”) regarding corporate governance is made pursuant to the policy of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The survey of the IOD is based on the information of a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand and the Market for Alternative Investment disclosed to the public and able to be accessed by a general public investor. The result, therefore, is from the perspective of a third party. It is not an evaluation of operation and is not based on inside information. The survey result is as of the date appearing in the Corporate Governance Report of Thai Listed Companies. As a result, the survey results may be changed after that date. FSS International Investment Advisory Company Limited does not confirm nor certify the accuracy of such survey results. * CGR scoring should be considered with news regarding wrong doing of the company or director or executive of the company such unfair practice on securities trading, fraud, and corruption SEC imposed a civil sanction against insider trading of director and executive; ** delisted Source: Thai Institute of Directors Association (IOD); FSSIA‟s compilation
THAILAND UTILITIES Suwat Sinsadok
18 FINANSIA
Anti-corruption Progress Indicator
CERTIFIED
ADVANC AIE AKP AMANAH AP APCS AQUA ARROW ASK ASP AYUD
BAFS BANPU BAY BBL BCH BCP BCPG BGRIM BJCHI BKI BLA
Certified This level indicates practical participation with thoroughly examination in relation to the recommended procedures from the audit committee or the SEC‟s certified auditor, being a certified member of Thailand's Private Sector Collective Action Coalition Against Corruption programme (Thai CAC) or already passed examination to ensure independence from external parties.
Declared This level indicates determination to participate in the Thailand's Private Sector Collective Action Coalition Against Corruption programme (Thai CAC)
Disclaimer: The disclosure of the Anti-Corruption Progress Indicators of a listed company on the Stock Exchange of Thailand, which is assessed by Thaipat Institute, is made in order to comply with the policy and sustainable development plan for the listed companies of th e Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Thaipat Institute made this assessment based on the information received from the listed company, as stipulated in the form for the assessment of Anti-corruption which refers to the Annual Registration Statement (Form 56-1), Annual Report (Form 56-2), or other relevant documents or reports of such listed company . The assessment result is therefore made from the perspective of Thaipat Institute that is a third party. It is not an assessment of operation and is not based on any inside information. Since this assessment is only the assessment result as of the date appearing in the assessment result, it may be changed after that date or when there is any change to the relevant information. Nevertheless, FSS International Investment Advisory Company Limited does not confirm, verify, or certify the accuracy and completeness of the assessment results.
Note: Companies participating in Thailand's Private Sector Collective Action Coalition Against Corruption programme (Thai CAC) under Thai Institute of Directors (as of June 24, 2019) are categorised into: 1) companies that have declared their intention to join CAC, and; 2) companies certified by CAC. Source: The Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand; * FSSIA‟s compilation
Suwat Sinsadok FSS International Investment Advisory Securities Co., Ltd
The individual(s) identified above certify(ies) that (i) all views expressed in this report accurately reflect the personal view of the analyst(s) with regard to
any and all of the subject securities, companies or issuers mentioned in this report; and (ii) no part of the compensation of the analyst(s) was, is, or will
be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed herein.
This report has been prepared by FSS International Investment Advisory Company Limited (FSSIA). The information herein has been obtained from
sources believed to be reliable and accurate; however FSS makes no representation as to the accuracy and completeness of such information.
Information and opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. FSS has no intention to solicit investors to buy or sell any security in
this report. In addition, FSS does not guarantee returns nor price of the securities described in the report nor accept any liability for any loss or damage
of any kind arising out of the use of such information or opinions in this report. Investors should study this report carefully in making investment
decisions. All rights are reserved.
This report may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person in any manner for any purpose without permission of FSSIA. Investment in
securities has risks. Investors are advised to consider carefully before making investment decisions.
Company Ticker Price Rating Valuation & Risks
BCPG BCPG TB THB 15.50 BUY The downside risks to our SoTP-based TP include: 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia; and 2) government intervention by way of electricity tariff subsidies.
CK Power CKP TB THB 4.72 BUY The downside risks to our SoTP-based TP include lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand and lower-than-expected water supply for hydro projects.
Energy Absolute EA TB THB 64.75 BUY Downside risks to our SoTP-based TP include: 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; 2) lower crude prices; and 3) lower-than-expected demand for batteries.
Gunkul Engineering GUNKUL TB THB 2.68 BUY The downside risks to our SoTP-based TP on GUNKUL include 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; 2) declining EPC backlogs; and 3) lower-than-expected utilisation rates for solar and wind farms.
Demco DEMCO TB THB 3.3 HOLD The upside risks to our SoTP-based TP on DEMCO include 1) higher-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; and 2) higher EPC demand. Downside risk includes delays in bidding for power transmission projects.
Power Solution Technologies PSTC TB THB 1.77 BUY The downside risks to our SoTP-based TP on PSTC include 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand and delays of power plant project start-ups.
Sermsang Power Corp SSP TB THB 12.80 BUY The downside risks to our SoTP-based TP for SSP include 1) a lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; 2) a lower crude price; and 3) project start-up delays.
TPC Power Holding TPCH TB THB 12.40 BUY The downside risks to our SoTP-based TP include 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; 2) a lower crude price; and 3) higher costs of biomass feedstock.
TPI Polene Power TPIPP TB THB 4.40 BUY Downside risks to our SoTP-based TP include 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; 2) lower crude prices; and 3) unplanned shutdowns of the company‟s power plants.
Absolute Clean Energy ACE TB THB 3.84 BUY The downside risks to our SoTP-based TP include 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; 2) a lower crude price; and 3) higher costs of biomass feedstock.
Earth Tech Environment ETC TB THB 1.88 HOLD Downside risks to our SoTP-based TP include: 1) lower-than-expected demand for electricity in Thailand; 2) lower crude prices; and 3) lower-than-expected industrial waste volumes. The upside risk would be the faster and larger-than-expected new capacity won by ETC in 2021.
PTT PTT TB THB 42.50 BUY Risks to our SoTP-based valuation are the oil price and potential earnings downsides from government intervention.
Source: FSSIA estimates
Additional Disclosures
Target price history, stock price charts, valuation and risk details, and equity rating histories applicable to each company rated in this report is available
in our most recently published reports. You can contact the analyst named on the front of this note or your representative at Finansia Syrus Securities
Public Company Limited
FSSIA may incorporate the recommendations and target prices of companies currently covered by FSS Research into equity research reports, denoted
by an „FSS‟ before the recommendation. FSS Research is part of Finansia Syrus Securities Public Company Limited, which is the parent company of
FSSIA.
All share prices are as at market close on 08-Jan-2021 unless otherwise stated.
THAILAND UTILITIES Suwat Sinsadok
20 FINANSIA
RECOMMENDATION STRUCTURE
Stock ratings
Stock ratings are based on absolute upside or downside, which we define as (target price* - current price) / current price.
BUY (B). The upside is 10% or more.
HOLD (H). The upside or downside is less than 10%.
REDUCE (R). The downside is 10% or more.
Unless otherwise specified, these recommendations are set with a 12-month horizon. Thus, it is possible that future price volatility may cause a
temporary mismatch between upside/downside for a stock based on market price and the formal recommendation.
* In most cases, the target price will equal the analyst's assessment of the current fair value of the stock. However, if the analyst doesn't think the market
will reassess the stock over the specified time horizon due to a lack of events or catalysts, then the target price may differ from fair value. In most cases,
therefore, our recommendation is an assessment of the mismatch between current market price and our assessment of current fair value.
Industry Recommendations
Overweight. The analyst expects the fundamental conditions of the sector to be positive over the next 12 months.
Neutral. The analyst expects the fundamental conditions of the sector to be maintained over the next 12 months.
Underweight. The analyst expects the fundamental conditions of the sector to be negative over the next 12 months.
Country (Strategy) Recommendations
Overweight (O). Over the next 12 months, the analyst expects the market to score positively on two or more of the criteria used to determine market
recommendations: index returns relative to the regional benchmark, index sharpe ratio relative to the regional benchmark and index returns relative to
the market cost of equity.
Neutral (N). Over the next 12 months, the analyst expects the market to score positively on one of the criteria used to determine market
recommendations: index returns relative to the regional benchmark, index sharpe ratio relative to the regional benchmark and index returns relative to
the market cost of equity.
Underweight (U). Over the next 12 months, the analyst does not expect the market to score positively on any of the criteria used to determine market
recommendations: index returns relative to the regional benchmark, index sharpe ratio relative to the regional benchmark and index returns relative to