TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON ELECTRONIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT Hilton St. Louis at the Ballpark 1 South Broadway St. Louis, MO 63102 Phone: (314) 421-1776 NFPA 1801 Second Draft Meeting St. Louis, MO July 23-25, 2019 AGENDA Meeting Start Time - 9:00 a.m. Local Time Conference Call Line: 855-747-8824 Passcode: 902034 1. Call to order and Chair remarks – Bob Athanas, Chair a. Moment of silence 2. Self-introduction of members and guests 3. Approval of Minutes of NFPA 1802 First Draft meeting, January 7-9, 2019 Orlando meeting (attached) 4. Chair Remarks a. Good and welfare b. Committee Changes 5. NFPA Staff Liaison Report – Dave Trebisacci a. TC actions on Public Comments b. How to create Second Revisions c. ELS document reorganization update
16
Embed
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON ELECTRONIC SAFETY ... - NFPA
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ON ELECTRONIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT
1. Call to order and Chair remarks – Bob Athanas, Chair a. Moment of silence
2. Self-introduction of members and guests
3. Approval of Minutes of NFPA 1802 First Draft meeting, January 7-9, 2019 Orlando
meeting (attached)
4. Chair Remarks a. Good and welfare b. Committee Changes
5. NFPA Staff Liaison Report – Dave Trebisacci
a. TC actions on Public Comments b. How to create Second Revisions c. ELS document reorganization update
6. NFPA 1801 TG Reports a. Image Quality – Gestler b. Scene Colorization – Cook c. Intrinsic Safety – Kelly
7. Review of Public Comments to NFPA 1801 (attached)
8. Creation of Second Revisions to NFPA 1801
9. NFPA 1802 Task Group Update – preparation for Public Comments to NFPA 1802 for
December Second Draft meeting
a. Chapter 1 - Administration TG – Jose Velo b. Chapter 2 - Referenced Publications TG – J. Velo c. Chapter 3 - Definitions TG – Tim Wolf, Matt Bowyer d. Chapter 4 - Certification – Gordon Sletmoe, Jim Rose, Steve Weinstein e. Chapter 5 - Product Labeling Information – Gerry Tarver, S. Weinstein, Craig
Gestler f. Chapter 6 - Design Requirements – Mike McKenna, Mike Worrell g. Chapter 7 - Performance Requirements – M. McKenna, M. Worrell, Steve
Townsend h. Chapter 8 - Test Methods – John Morris, Christina Spoons
10. NFPA 1802 Ambassador Reports
a. IAB – b. First Net – Worrell c. IAFF – Brooks d. IAFC, NFPA 1221 – Facella e. APCO –
11. Old business
12. New business – 2020 meeting dates (bring your calendars)
13. Adjourn at close of business July 25, 2019
1
NFPA 1802
First Draft, Orlando
January 8-10, 2019 Call to order: 0910
Introductions: Bob Athanas, Dave Trebisacci and members’ self-introductions
Minutes: Motion by Bill Haskell, second by Steve Weinstein to approve unanimously.
Members Present: (a –alternate; g- guest; SL – staff liaison) Bob Athanas - Chair Steve Weinstein Rebecca Norwood (a) Kevin Roche Gordon Sletmoe Achim Volmer (a) Matthew Shannon (a) Steven Makky Sr. Matthew Bowyer John Morris Michael Quinn (a) Angelina Seay Christopher Sampl Chuck Jaris (a) Joseph Namm William Haskell Timothy Rehak (a) James Rose (a) Michael Hussey William Frank (a) Craig Gestler Michael McKenna Louis Chavez Mike Worrell Jose Velo Mark Kroll (a) Kevin Lentz (a) Scott Kraut (a) Robert Simmonds (a) Kamil Agi Timothy Wolf
2
Don Herbert (g) Joel Johnson (g) Clint Smith (g) Jeff Barnitz (g) Mac Hartless (g) Joseph Brooks (g) Judge Morgan (g) Chris Yttri (g) Michael Blomquist (g) John Rehayem (g)
NFPA Staff Liaison Report: Dave Trebisacci (SL) - Committee Composition - NFPA 1802 Radio Device and Timeline - NFPA 1801 public input and revision cycle and timeline - NFPA 1982 PASS
NFPA 1802 Public Input Review: The Technical Committee reviewed Public Input and created 61 First Revisions.
The next meeting was scheduled for July 23-25, 2019 (NFPA 1801 Public Comment Meeting) at a site to be determined.
The meeting was adjourned at 1100 on January 10, 2019
Process
StageProcess Step
Dates for
TC
Dates for
TC with CC
Public Input Closing Date 6/27/2018 6/27/2018
Final date for TC First Draft Meeting 12/5/2018 9/5/2018Posting of First Draft and TC Ballot 1/23/2019 10/17/2018Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot 2/13/2019 11/7/2018Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot ‐ recirc 2/20/2019 11/14/2018Posting of First Draft for CC Meeting 11/21/2018Final date for CC First Draft Meeting 1/2/2019Posting of First Draft and CC Ballot 1/23/2019Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot 2/13/2019Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot ‐ recirc 2/20/2019Post First Draft Report for Public Comment 2/27/2019 2/27/2019
Public Comment closing date 5/8/2019 5/8/2019Notice published on Consent Standards (Standards that receive No Comments).
Note: Date varies and determined via TC ballot.Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards (Standards That Received No
Comments)Final date for TC Second Draft Meeting 11/6/2019 7/31/2019Posting of Second Draft and TC Ballot 12/18/2019 9/11/2019Final date for Receipt of TC Second Draft Ballot 1/8/2020 10/2/2019Final date for receipt of TC Second Draft ballot ‐ recirc 1/15/2020 10/9/2019Posting of Second Draft for CC Mtg 10/16/2019Final date for CC Second Draft Meeting 11/27/2019Posting of Second Draft for CC Ballot 12/18/2019Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot 1/8/2020Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot ‐ recirc 1/15/2020Post Second Draft Report for NITMAM Review 1/22/2020 1/22/2020
Notice of Intent to Make a Motion (NITMAM) Closing Date 2/19/2020 2/19/2020Posting of Certified Amending Motions (CAMs) and Consent Standards 4/1/2020 4/1/2020Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards 4/16/2020 4/16/2020SC Issuance Date for Consent Standards 4/26/2020 4/26/2020
Tech Session Association Meeting for Standards with CAMs 6/14‐18/2020 6/14‐18/2020
Appeal Closing Date for Standards with CAMs 7/8/2020 7/8/2020Council Issuance Date for Standards with CAMs* 8/10‐14/2020 8/10‐14/2020
Approved: 8/4/2016
Comment
Stage (Second
Draft)
Tech Session
Preparation
(& Issuance)
Appeals and
Issuance
2020 ANNUAL REVISION CYCLE
Public Input
Stage
(First Draft)
* Public Input Closing Dates may vary according to standards and schedules for Revision Cycles may change. Please check the
NFPA Website for the most up‐to‐date information on Public Input Closing Dates and schedules at www.nfpa.org/document #
(i.e. www.nfpa.org/101) and click on Next Edition tab.
7/1/2019 National Fire Protection Association Report
The spatial resolution source target shall consist of two thin, rigid, flat metal surfaces: theemitting surface, and the stencil with the target and 15 cm ± 5 mm × 15 cm ± 5 mm squarecutout. The metal shall be copper for the emitting surface and aluminum for the stencil asdetailed in Figure 8.1.4.3. Each surface shall have dimensions of 3 mm ± 0.5 mm. The front sideof both surfaces shall be painted with flat black paint having a stated emissivity of 0.95 ± 0.03.
Figure 8.1.4.3 Spatial Resolution Source Target.
7/1/2019 National Fire Protection Association Report
Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 1801-2019 [ Section No. 8.1.4.3 [Excluding any
Sub-Sections] ]
The spatial resolution source target shall consist of two thin, rigid, flat metal surfaces: theemitting surface, and the stencil with the target and 15 cm ± 5 mm × 15 cm ± 5 mm squarecutout. The metal shall be copper for the emitting surface and aluminum for the stencil asdetailed in Figure 8.1.4.3. Each surface shall have dimensions of 3 mm ± 0.5 mm. The frontside of both surfaces shall be painted with flat black paint having a stated emissivity of 0.95 ±0.03.
Figure 8.1.4.3 Spatial Resolution Source Target.
Additional Proposed Changes
File Name Description Approvednew_region_of_interest_suggestion.JPG
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
Submitter Full Name: John MorrisOrganization: 3M CompanyStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Wed May 08 10:15:33 EDT 2019Committee: FAE-ELS
Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 1801-2019 [ Section No. 8.1.4.3.1 ]
8.1.4.3.1
The emitting surface shall be capable of being evenly heated to a surface temperature of 28°C32°C ± 0 1 .5°C 0°C (82°F 90°F ± 1°F 1.8°F ) . The mechanism by which the emitting surfaceis heated shall not be visible to the thermal imager under test. The heating mechanism shall bepermitted to add thickness to the side of the surface that does not face the thermal imagerduring the test.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The Image Recognition TG recommends that we increase the temperature differential between the front and rear panels from 6C to 10C. This change improves the repeatability of the test.
Related Item• Public Input 27
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Craig GestlerOrganization: Mine Safety Appliances CompanyAffiliation: Submitted on behalf of the Image Recognition TGStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Thu May 02 10:21:29 EDT 2019Committee: FAE-ELS
7/1/2019 National Fire Protection Association Report
Public Comment No. 3-NFPA 1801-2019 [ Section No. 8.1.4.9 ]
8.1.4.9
The image capturing software and hardware shall permit 16-bit uncompressed color images tobe downloaded from the visible spectrum camera to a computer or memory at a rate of oneimage every 3 seconds ± 0.1 second.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
This section is not applicable. It was initially added when some degree of automation in the image processing was being considered. That is no longer the case and this requirement adds unnecessary complication.
Related Item• Public Input 27
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Craig GestlerOrganization: Mine Safety Appliances CompanyAffiliation: Entered on behalf of the Image Recognition TGStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Thu May 02 10:38:48 EDT 2019Committee: FAE-ELS
7/1/2019 National Fire Protection Association Report
Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 1801-2019 [ Section No. 8.1.5.3 ]
8.1.5.3
The spatial resolution source target emitting surface temperature shall be stabilized at 28°C32°C ± 0 1 .5°C 0°C (82°F 90°F ± 1°F 1.8°F ).
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The Image recognition TG has determined that increasing the temperature differential between the front and rear plates from 6C to 10C improves the repeatability of the test.
Related Item• Public Input 27
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Craig GestlerOrganization: Mine Safety Appliances CompanyAffiliation: Submitted on behalf of the Image Recognition TGStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Thu May 02 10:32:57 EDT 2019Committee: FAE-ELS
7/1/2019 National Fire Protection Association Report
Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 1801-2019 [ Section No. 8.1.5.9 ]
8.1.5.9
A region of interest shall be selected that is equal in size to the warm region of interest. Thissecond region of interest shall be on the opposite side of the directly opposite the warm regionof interest with respect to the center vertical axis of the spatial resolution target from the warmregion of interest . It shall contain ambient temperature pixels only and shall not interfere withthe spatial resolution patterns and shall be labeled A. The image processing software shallapply these regions of interest to all images.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
Clarifying precisely where the second region of interest is to be located. Our round robin testing indicated that SR results will vary depending on where the second region of interest is drawn on the target. This clarification will improve consistency in the test results.
Submitter Full Name: Landon BordersOrganization: Bullard (on behalf of the Image Quality TG)Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Thu May 02 17:07:17 EDT 2019Committee: FAE-ELS
7/1/2019 National Fire Protection Association Report
Public Comment No. 4-NFPA 1801-2019 [ Section No. 8.1.5.10 ]
8.1.5.10 *
Two separate pixel smoothing filters shall be applied to the regions of interest. A movingaverage in two dimensions shall be applied to the regions of interest, with the average having aperiod equal to the width the horizontal distance and height vertical distance of the thermalthe thermal imager display pixels observed in the captured images. It shall be labeled the 1Xfilter. A second filter shall be applied in the same manner as the 1X filter but with a period fourtimes greater and shall be labeled the 4X filter. Both filters shall be applied to the original image;the resulting images shall be labeled W1X, W4X, A1X and A4X, and shall be storedindependently for further calculation.
Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment
The intent of this section is to measure the distance from the edge of pixel 1 to the edge of pixel 2 (the pixel frequency), taking into account the "white space" between the pixels. We do not want the dimensions of the pixel itself.
Related Item• Public Input 27
Submitter Information Verification
Submitter Full Name: Craig GestlerOrganization: Mine Safety Appliances CompanyAffiliation: Submitted on behalf of the Image Recognition TGStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Thu May 02 10:43:11 EDT 2019Committee: FAE-ELS