Top Banner
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Sandeep.B, M.Pharm, II Semester, Department of Pharmacy Practice
18
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: TDM

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Sandeep.B,M.Pharm, II Semester,

Department of Pharmacy Practice

Page 2: TDM

Contents:

Introduction Necessity of TDM Objectives Criteria for TDM Drugs requiring TDM Sampling Examples Factors influencing plasma drug concentration Analytical techniques used in TDM Clinical interpretation of results Role of Pharmacist in TDM Limitations References

Page 3: TDM

Introduction:

Therapeutic drug monitoring is defined as a “a process of assessing concentration of the drug in biological fluids such that it is maintained within the therapeutic range.”

It aims at individualizing the dose for a patient to obtain maximum benefit.

TDM closely observes the changes in the signs and symptoms of patient and the related laboratory data as well which affect the clinical outcome of the therapy.

TDM establishes safety and effectiveness of therapy.

Page 4: TDM

Time

Pla

sma d

rug c

once

ntr

ati

on

MEC

MSCTherapeutic Range

Toxic Level

Subtherapeutic Level

Plasma drug Concentration Vs Time Plot

Page 5: TDM

Necessity for TDM:

TDM is necessary for certain drugs having narrow therapeutic range or non-linear pharmacokinetics, where the dosage individualization becomes difficult.

It is useful in assessing the variability between the individual patient’s response to drug therapy which arises due to differences between:

Dose of the drug and its plasma concentration (Pharmacokinetic variability)

Concentration of the drug at the receptor site and its response (Pharmacodynamic variability)

Page 6: TDM

Objectives:

1. Obtaining maximum beneficial outcome of drug therapy by approximate dosing of drugs.

2. Attaining the required therapeutic concentration of the drug within least time and maintaining the concentration within the therapeutic range.

3. Providing medical advantage by reducing the chances of drug toxicity.

4. Providing economic convenience to the patients by shortening their hospital stay.

5. Monitoring of factors like disease state, patient’s characteristics, drug interactions etc., in order to reduce patient variability.

6. Dosage adjustment in patients with pre-existing hepatic or renal impairment and thus preventing drug accumulation in the body.

7. TDM can provide an effective means of individualization of dosing of some drugs that have unpredictable dose-response relationship.

Page 7: TDM

Criteria for TDM:

The criteria for obtaining a valid TDM which is clinically effective is:

1. A well established correlation among concentration of drug in plasma and its therapeutic response and toxicity.

2. Meagre correlation between concentration of drug in plasma and its dose.

3. An acceptable evidence for performing TDM i.e., no response of the patient to the drug therapy, patient’s non-compliance, signs and symptoms of toxicity.

4. Availability of specific and well established methodology.

5. Collection of biological samples at regular intervals.

6. There should be sufficient clinical data which permits rapid and accurate interpretation of clinical outcome.

Page 8: TDM

Drugs requiring TDM:

The following features of the drugs necessitate their TDM:

1. Narrow therapeutic range

2. Significant pharmacokinetic variability (ADME)

3. Drugs which show therapeutic as well as ADR based on their relative concentrations

4. Availability of cost effective drug assay

5. Drugs which follow saturation metabolism

Page 9: TDM

1. Anticancer drugs- Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, Methotrexate

2. Antiepileptics- Phenytoin, Fosphenytoin, Valproic acid, Carbamazepin

3. Cardiotonics- Digoxin

4. Immunosupressants- Cyclosporin, Tacrolimus

5. Antibiotics- Ampicilline, Vancomycin

6. Antiarrythmics- Amiadarone, Lidocaine

Page 10: TDM

Sampling:

Proper selection of Sample time is of vital importance in obtaining an effective TDM.

Generally biological samples (mostly venous blood) are collected after the drug reaches steady state concentration.

For most of the drugs, Steady-state concentration is reached at least after 5 biological half lives.

The point in dosing interval which is least inconsistent is known as pre-dose or trough concentration.

The dosing interval and duration of dosing are the factors which influence variations in drug concentrations in plasma.

Page 11: TDM

Drug Therapeutic range

Half-life in Adults

Average time taken to reach steady state concentration

Digoxin 0.5-2 mcg/l 30-50 hrs 7-12 days

Phenytoin 10-20 mg/l 10-30 hrs 8-21 days

Carbamazepine 5-12 mg/l l0-30 hrs 3-5 days

Lithium 0.5-1 mmol/l 14-30 hrs 5-8 days

Amiodarone 1-2.5 mg/l 27-105 days 3-6 months

Cyclosporin 100-200 mcg/l 19 hrs 3-4 days

Theophylline 7-15 mg/l Smokers (7-11 hrs)Nonsmokers (3-5 hrs)

24-36 hrs

Gentamycin <0.5 mg/l 2-5 hrs <24 hrs

Vancomycin 5-15 mg/l 3-8 hrs 24-48 hrs

Valproate 50-100 mg/l 6-20 hrs 3-5 days

Page 12: TDM

Factors influencing plasma drug concentration:

1. Patient characteristics

2. Patient compliance

3. Dosage regimen and Duration of therapy

4. Time of sampling

5. Alteration in Protein binding

6. Alteration in elimination of drugs

7. Pathological characteristics

8. Drug interactions

9. Smoking and alcohol consumption

10. Sampling and Laboratory errors

Page 13: TDM

Analytical techniques used in TDM:

The techniques chiefly employed for detection of drugs in a TDM laboratory are:

1. HPLC

2. GC/MS

3. LC/MS

4. RIA

5. PETINIA

6. EIA

7. EMIT

8. FPIA

9. CEDIA

10. Chemiluminiscence

11. One-step Dry Chemistry Technique

Page 14: TDM

Clinical interpretation of resultsClinical conditions requiring TDM for drugs used for

prophylaxisCollection of biological sample

Transfer to laboratory and estimation of drug concentration by suitable method

Interpretation of TDM results with reference to clinical conditions

Inadequate/Lack of Clinical response

Satisfactory Clinical response

Below TR Within TR

Above TR

Check the follow up of therapy

Increase dose if required

If required a small change in dose should be considered

Change or re consider drug therapy

Check the follow up of therapy

Below TR

Within TR

Above TR

Other possible reasons for signs of toxicity should be considered. Laboratory errors should be checked

Other possible reasons for signs of toxicity should be considered. Lower dose can be given if result indicates the relief of disease

Discontinue the therapy and restart with a low dose

Page 15: TDM

Role of Pharmacist in TDM:

A clinical pharmacist may assist other health care professionals by advising them about correct use if TDM- sampling time, sampling technique and interpretation of results.

They also may be engaged in:

1. Selecting initial drug dosage regimen-dose, dosing interval, route of administration, dosage form.

2. Depending upon the TDM results and patient’s response, revision and adjustment of dosage regimen should be done.

3. Assessing various other reasons for unexpected results like patient’s non-compliance, medication or laboratory errors, DDIs etc.

4. Evaluating and adjusting dosage for patients on haemodialysis.

5. Managing acute drug interactions.

Page 16: TDM

Limitations of TDM:

Scientific accuracy of drug assays Laboratory variability in reporting Validity of suggested target ranges. Active metabolites which contribute to the

therapeutic response cannot be measured.

Page 17: TDM

References

1. Birkett DJ. Therapeutic drug monitoring. Aust Prescr 1997;20:9-11

2. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), An Educational Guide. www.siemens.com/diagnostics

3. Summers, K. K., T. C. Hardin, S. J. Gore, and J. R. Graybill. 1997. Therapeutic drug monitoring of systemic antifungal therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:753-764.

4. Schumacher GE. Clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring. Comprehensive pharmacy review; 7:732-741

5. Flexner D. Update on HIV pharmacology and therapeutic drug monitoring. Perspectives - Pharmacology and therapeutic drug monitoring Vol 9 Issue 3 July 2001

Page 18: TDM

THANK YOU…