Top Banner
IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000 Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab Motorola, Inc. Phoenix, AZ
17

Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

Glyn

Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab Motorola, Inc. Phoenix, AZ. Why do multiscale modeling? - Perspective from semiconductor manufacturing. 0.2 m. 0.1 m m. wafer. Deposited Film. T Merchant. Typically, tool “knobs” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Taking on the Multiscale ChallengeEven Small-Scale Victories are Good

Len Borucki

Digital DNA LabMotorola, Inc.Phoenix, AZ

Page 2: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Why do multiscale modeling? - Perspective from semiconductor manufacturing.

Typically, tool “knobs”control tool physics on the~0.1-1 meter scale

0.2 m

However, the goal is to controlan outcome at the micron scale orbelow over a wide area of the wafer.

0.1 m

Deposited Filmwafer

Tools are expensive, so optimizing their use is important.

T Merchant

Page 3: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Several spatial scales may be involved.

Equipment or Wafer ScaleDie (Chip) Scale

Feature Scale

~1 cm

Differences in feature packing densities within a die or across a wafer may affect local feature scale uniformitydue to depletion of reactants or other effects related to feature density.

Page 4: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Tushar three scale slide

Page 5: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Tushar results slide

Page 6: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Page 7: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Starting at the atomic level, the goal of modeling may be to predict structureand properties at much larger length and time scales. There are huge gaps.

~10-10 m and ~10-12 secFilm precursors.Gas phase and surfacechemistry.

A. Korkin, N. Tanpipat

Film nucleation, growth, grainstructure and transport properties.

~10-9 - ~10-5 m and ~102 sec

VoidNucleation

C-L Liu

D. Richards

MetalLifetime

~10-4 - ~10-3 m and ~104 - ~108 sec

Electronic properties

Film thickness ~10-9-~10-8 m

Page 8: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Challenge: Film Nucleation, Growth

Source: J. Zhang, J. Adams, Arizona State UniversitySee http://ceaspub.eas.asu.edu/cms/

Facet growth during physical vapordeposition with surface diffusion. KLMC.

Activation energies for diffusion along andbetween facets. Embedded atom method.

Grain Nucleation (FCC nuclei with {100}, {111} or {110} facets, randomly rotated and cut)

Grain growthfor an isotropicor unidirectionalsource. Stringalgorithm, not alevel set method.

Isotropic Source

Page 9: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Challenge: Calculation of properties of polycrystalline structures.

Page 10: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Calculating transport properties of large polycrystalline structures - an example.

tf = e v

D(v)dv

0

1

where = /c

D

Aj

x

Di Dg m ( / W) Dgb sin( j / 2) cos(A j) j1

Ngbi

Tilt AngleW=Line Width

= Grain Boundary Width

This very simplemodel produces afairly convincingstatistical failuretime distribution.

Page 11: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Mesh with embedded network.

Page 12: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Numerical method for FE mesh with embedded network.

Page 13: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Joule Heating in a Snake

Page 14: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

A Different Reacting Flow Multiscale Problem: Chemical-Mechanical Polishing

Figure 1: Idealized model of a single wafer CMP tool. The polishing platen,wafer carrier, and conditioning tool rotate at independent rates while the carrierand conditioner oscillate radially over the pad surface. A thin, elastic carrier film(not shown) is sometimes used between the wafer and wafer carrier. A soft pad(Suba pad) may also be inserted between the polishing pad and the platen.

P

Table (Platen)

Pad

Slurry

Wafer

Wafer Carrier

w

Force Fw

d (t)w

rw

d (t)c

Conditioner

rc

Force Fc

c

A chemically reactive slurrycontaining ~0.1 m particles is sprayed on a rotatingpolyurethane pad in front ofa rotating wafer. The slurryattacks the surface layer on thewafer, allowing the particlesto more easily abrade andsmooth the layer.

Page 15: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

The polyurethane pad containsnumerous voids averaging ~30microns in diameter.

Voids exposed at the surface fill with slurry. The slurrylayer is very thin in highly compressed areas betweenthe voids. Slurry particles probably contact the waferin these compressed regions.

Chemical-Mechanical Polishing

Page 16: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Somehow, this surface structure plays arole in the details of the development ofsuction fluid pressure under the wafer.

The suction pressure may in turn affect theuniformity of the removal rate on the waferscale.

Shan, Georgia Tech

Chemical-Mechanical Polishing

Question: How to describe the pad surface and utilize the information in a model with alonger length scale; eg. the Reynolds equation?

Page 17: Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories are Good Len Borucki Digital DNA Lab

IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000

Summary

Multiscale models either Start at equipment scale and connect with the feature scale. Start at the atomic level and progress toward longer length and time scales.

Very significant gaps exist, for example, Modeling of nucleation and growth of polycrystalline films, particularly in 3D and with topography. Prediction of properties of polycrystalline materials. Better mathematical and numerical methods.