Top Banner
SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis- Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18, 2005 [email protected] www.PBIS.org www.SWIS.org
52

SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Dec 28, 2015

Download

Documents

Trevor Day
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

SW PBS:Training for Coaching

CapacityMD PBIS Leadership Team

George Sugai & Teri Lewis-PalmerOSEP Center on PBIS

University of Connecticut

July 18, 2005

[email protected]

www.PBIS.org www.SWIS.org

Page 2: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Purpose

• Discuss importance of coaching capacity

• Review coaching basics

• Provide guidelines for effective coaching

Page 3: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Problem Statement

“We give schools strategies & systems for developing more positive, effective, & caring school & classroom climates, but implementation is not accurate, consistent, or durable. Schools & teams need more than training.”

Page 4: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Competing, Inter-related National Goals

• Improve literacy, math, geography, science, etc.

• Make schools safe, caring, & focused on teaching & learning

• Improve student character & citizenship

• Eliminate bullying

• Prevent drug use

• Prepare for postsecondary education

• Provide a free & appropriate education for all

• Prepare viable workforce

• Affect rates of high risk, antisocial behavior

• Leave no child behind

• Etc….

Page 5: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Worry“Train & hope” approach

1. React to identified problem

2. Select & add practice

3. Hire expert to train practice

4. Expect & hope for implementation

5. Wait for new problem….

Page 6: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Discovery Education

“Discovery is no solution to the problems of education. The individual cannot be expected to rediscover more than a very small part of the facts and principles that have already been discovered by others. To stop teaching in order that the student may learn for himself is to abandon education as a medium for transmission of the accumulated knowledge and wisdom of a culture” (Skinner, 1965, p 101).

Page 7: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Systems Perspective• Organization do not “behave”

…individuals behave

• “Organization is group of individuals who behave together to achieve a common goal”

• “Systems are needed to support collective use of best practices by individuals in an organization” (Horner, 2001)

Schools as Systems

Goal to create communities that for all its members have common

• Vision

• Language, &

• Experience

Biglan, 1995; Horner, 2002

Adopt systems perspective

Page 8: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Leadership Team

FundingVisibility Political

Support

Training Coaching Evaluation

Active Coordination

Local School Teams/Demonstrations

PBS Systems Implementation Logic

Page 9: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Coaching (why?)• Team start-up support

• Team sustainability/accountability– Technical assistance/problem solving

– Positive reinforcement

– Prompts (“positive nags”)

• Public relations/communications

• Support network across schools

• Link among leadership, trainers, & teams

• Local facilitation

• Increased behavioral capacity

Page 10: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Terminology

• Coaching v. Facilitating

– Same

• Coach v. Facilitator

– Same

• Facilitating v. Coach

– Skills/tasks v. Person

Page 11: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

What is “Coaching Capacity?”

• Personnel & resources organized to facilitate, assist, maintain, & adapt local school training implementation efforts

• Coaching is set of responsibilities, actions, & activities….not person

Page 12: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Guiding Principles (“Requirements”)

• Coaching linked with school team

• Coaching training linked with team training

• Coaches participate in team training

• New teams added with increased fluency

• Coaching capacity integrated into existing personnel Supervisor approval given

• District agreements & support given

• Coaches experienced with school team implementation

• District/state coordination provided

• Coaches meet regularly for prompting, celebrating, problem solving, etc.

Page 13: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Successful Coaching starts by “knowing the

basics”

Redundancy & practice build fluency!

Page 14: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Primary Prevention:School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for

All Students,Staff, & Settings

Secondary Prevention:Specialized Group

Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior

Tertiary Prevention:Specialized

IndividualizedSystems for Students

with High-Risk Behavior

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

3-Tiered Prevention Logic

Page 15: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATASupportingStaff Behavior

SupportingStudent Behavior

OUTCOMES

Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement

SupportingDecisionMaking

SW PBS

Page 16: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

PBSFeatures

Science of Human

Behavior

Local Context& Culture

Prevention Logic

NaturalImplementers

Evidence-Based

Practices

SystemsChange&

Durability

Continuum ofBehavior Support

Page 17: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

PBS Implementation

LogicLEADERSHIP TEAM

SCHOOL-WIDE

Build DataSystem

Establishmeasurable

outcome

Collect, analyze, &prioritize data

Ensure efficient,accurate, & durable

implementation

Implement

Monitorimplementation &

progress

Selectevidence-based

practice

Page 18: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

What does SWPBS look like?

• Work in teams of 2-3 (13 minutes)

• List observable/measurable features that indicate SWPBS being implemented in school

• Report 2-3 planned activities from your team action planning (1 min.)

AttentionPlease

1 MinuteSpokesperson

Page 19: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

What does PBS look like?SW-PBS (primary)• >80% of students can tell you

what is expected of them & give behavioral example because they have been taught, actively supervised, practiced, & acknowledged.

• Positive adult-to-student interactions exceed negative

• Function based behavior support is foundation for addressing problem behavior.

• Data- & team-based action planning & implementation are operating.

• Administrators are active participants.

• Full continuum of behavior support is available to all students

Secondary & Tertiary

• Team-based coordination & problem solving

• Local specialized behavioral capacity

• Function-based behavior support planning

• Person-centered, contextually & culturally relevant

• District/regional behavioral capacity

• Instructionally oriented

• Linked to SW-PBS practices & systems

• School-based comprehensive supports

Page 20: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Nonclass

room

Setting S

ystems

ClassroomSetting Systems

Individual Student

Systems

School-wideSystems

Research to Practice

Page 21: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

School-wide Systems

1. Common purpose & approach to discipline

2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors

3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior

4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior

5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior

6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation

Page 22: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Classroom Management Systems

• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged

• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged

• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction

• Active supervision

• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors

• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors

• Effective academic instruction & curriculum

Page 23: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Nonclassroom Systems

• Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged

• Active supervision by all staff– Scan, move, interact

• Precorrections & reminders

• Positive reinforcement

Page 24: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Individual Student System• Behavioral competence at school & district

levels

• Function-based behavior support planning

• Team- & data-based decision making

• Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes

• Targeted social skills & self-management instruction

• Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations

Page 25: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Behavior Support Elements

Problem Behavior

Functional Assessment

Intervention & Support Plan

Fidelity of Implementation

Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle

*Response class*Routine analysis*Hypothesis statement*Function *Alternative behaviors

*Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit*Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes*Evidence-based interventions

*Implementation support*Data plan

*Continuous improvement*Sustainability plan

• Team-based• Behavior competence

Page 26: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Data Base for Study

• 145 elementary schools across four states in Center database– 89 at SET criterion (80% or higher)

• Not randomized sample– All schools exposed to SWIS

– All at different levels of implementation

– Not enough middle/high school data

Therefore, conservative (“tough”) sample

Page 27: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Initial Findings: Lower suspension rates generally for all kids in SW-PBS schools

• Across all schools, OSS rates 2x higher for kids on IEPs

• In non SW-PBS schools, OSS rates 2x higher

• In SW-PBS schools,

– 48% lower OSS rate for IEP kids

– 33% lower OSS rate for non-IEP kids

Page 28: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Implications of Establishing SW-PBS Processes & Systems

• School climate enhanced for all students when school-wide PBS in place

• Students with IEPs benefit when school-wide PBS in place

Page 29: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Agreements

Team

Data-based Action Plan

ImplementationEvaluation

GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION

PROCESS

Page 30: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

How do I keep track of all this stuff?

Useful Tools

• Coaches’ Implementation Checklist (Form C)

• Team Implementation Checklist – Rev (Form A)

• Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI)

• School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)

Page 31: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

MD Team Implementation Checklist(Rev Form A)

Establish Commitment

1. Administrator support & active involvement

– Attends meetings 90% of the time

– Provides funding for PBIS activities

– Puts time on staff agenda for PBIS updates

– Actively promotes PBIS as priority, integrates with other initiatives/improvement activities

2. Faculty/Staff support (One of top 3 goals, 80% of faculty document support, 3 year timeline)

– Climate/Discipline one of top 3 school improvement goals

– Faculty feedback is obtained throughout year

– Faculty involved in some decision making/establishing goals

– Admin/faculty commits to PBIS for at least 3 years

Page 32: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Establish & Maintain Team

3. Team established (representative)– Includes: grade level teachers, special area,

paraprofessionals, parents, special ed, school counselor, non classroom monitors,

– Has established a clear mission/purpose

4. Team has regular meeting schedule, effective operating procedures– Agenda is used, coach is notified of meeting time,

admin present to approve activities/decisions

5. Committee/Workgroup review completed/updated annually– PBIS team has clearly defined

objectives/outcomes

Page 33: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Initiative, Project,

Committee

Purpose Outcome Target Group

Staff Involved

SIP/SID/etc

Attendance Committee

Character Education

Safety Committee

School Spirit Committee

Discipline Committee

DARE Committee

EBS Work Group

Working Smarter

Page 34: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Initiative, Committee

Purpose Outcome Target Group

Staff Involved

SIP/SID

Attendance Committee

Increase attendance

Increase % of students attending daily

All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee

Goal #2

Character Education

Improve character Improve character All students Marlee, J.S., Ellen

Goal #3

Safety Committee Improve safety Predictable response to threat/crisis

Dangerous students

Has not met Goal #3

School Spirit Committee

Enhance school spirit

Improve morale All students Has not met

Discipline Committee

Improve behavior Decrease office referrals Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders

Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Otis

Goal #3

DARE Committee Prevent drug use High/at-risk drug users

Don

EBS Work Group Implement 3-tier model

Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades

All students Eric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma

Goal #2

Goal #3

Sample Teaming Matrix

Page 35: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Self-Assessment

6. Team/faculty complete PBIS survey (completed annually)

– Self Assessment is used to write annual action plan

– Results are shared with staff.

7. Team summarizes existing school discipline data.

8. Strengths, areas of immediate focus & action plan are identified.

– Schedule/plans for teaching staff discipline & data system are developed

– Team makes it easy for staff to implement & responds to feedback

– Schedule for rewards/incentives for the year is planned

– Plans for orienting incoming staff & students are developed

– Plans for involving families & community are developed

Page 36: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Establish School-wide Expectations

9. 3-5 school-wide behavior expectations are defined & posted in all areas of building.

– Expectations apply to both staff & students

– Posters are similar, paired with icon & highly visible

10. School-wide teaching matrix developed.

– Rules developed for specific settings

– Rules are linked to expectations

Page 37: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

School-Wide Expectations - continued

11. Teaching plans for school-wide expectations are developed.

– A behavioral curriculum includes concept & skill level instruction

– Lessons include examples & non-examples

– Strategies for use by families/community are developed

– Faculty/staff & students are involved in development

12. School-wide behavioral expectations taught directly & formally.

– Lessons are embedded into subject area curriculum

– Schedule/plans for teaching staff lesson plans for students are developed

– Booster sessions for students & staff are scheduled/planned

Page 38: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Establish On-Going System for Rewarding Behavioral Expectations

13. System for rewarding student behavior is established.

– Rewards are linked to expectations

– Rewards are varied to maintain student interest

– System includes opportunities for naturally occurring reinforcement

– Ratios of reinforcement to corrections are high

– Students are involved in identifying/developing incentives

– The system includes incentives for staff/faculty.

Page 39: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Establish System for Responding to Behavioral Violations

14. Staff & administration agree on what problems are office managed & what problems are staff managed.

– Behaviors defined

– Clearly identified major/minor behaviors

– Suggested array of appropriate responses to minor (classroom managed behaviors)

– Suggested array of appropriate responses to major (office managed) behaviors

– Clearly defined & consistent consequences & procedures for undesirable behaviors are developed

– Process includes documentation procedures

Page 40: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Establish Information System

15. Discipline data are gathered, summarized, reported to staff, & used to make decisions.– Data collection is easy, efficient, relevant

– Add’l data collected (attendance, grades, faculty attendance, surveys)

– Data entered weekly (minimum)

– Data analyzed monthly (minimum)

– Data shared with team & faculty monthly (minimum)

– Office referral form lists: (a) student/grade, (b) date/time, (c) referring staff, (d) problem behavior, (e) location, (f) persons involved, (g) probable motivation, & (h) consequences

Page 41: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Build Capacity for Function-based Support

16. Personnel with behavioral expertise are identified & involved.

– At least one individual on the PBIS team who has training or experience in behavior support including practical foundations, data collection & analysis, design & implement comprehensive plans

17. Plan developed to identify & establish systems for teacher support, functional assessment & support plan development & implementation

– Students identified through multiple data sources, teacher/parent request

– Teachers feel supported by SW team-response time to request within 24hours

– Focus of support is preventative, educative, functional, data based, empirically valid, collaborative and tied to SW, classroom & individual support programs

Page 42: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Build District Level Support

18. Allocate money for building & maintaining school-wide behavioral support.

– PBIS is high on list of priorities

– Activities, printing costs, FTE are funded adequately

19. Identify facilitator (coach) who connects the school with district-wide PBIS efforts, attends team meetings & provides technical assistance.

20. Write professional development plan for increasing technical skills in area of PBS & team-work.

– School data drives professional development plan, training topics & schedule is embedded within annual action plan

– Other initiatives are integrated with PBIS

Page 43: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

On-going Activity

1. PBS team has met at least monthly.

2. PBS team has given status report to faculty at least monthly.

3. Activities for PBS action plan implemented

4. Accuracy of implementation of PBS action plan assessed.

5. Effectiveness of PBS action plan implementation assessed.

6. PBS data analyzed & shared with school staff.

Page 44: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Office Discipline Referral Information

1. # Office Discipline Referrals (ODR)

2. # Suspensions

SWIS.org

Page 45: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

MD Coaches’ Checklist (Form C)

Team Activities

1. Administrator is active & present for meetings.

2. Team is making progress on PBIS “Getting Started” checklist (Form A).

3. Team uses school discipline & related data to discuss monthly progress.

4. Team uses annual action plan to discuss monthly progress

5. Team provides monthly updates/data summaries to entire school staff.

6. Team meetings are effectively run (e.g., clear objectives, tasks, goals).

7. Team activities are coordinated with other school initiatives & committees.

Page 46: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Coaching Activities

• FTE allocated & sufficient enough to complete tasks

• Consistently attend team meetings.

• Assist team with data-based decision-making, planning, & implementation.

• Attend regional/state coaches meetings & trainings.

• Send information to PBIS State/District Coordinator (e.g., checklists, action plans, etc.)

• Assist with dissemination activities (e.g., presentations, case studies, articles, etc.)

Page 47: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI)

• 2x year to assess PBS implementation

• 3 main phases (*critical elements)

– Preparation

– Initiation

– Implementation

– Maintenance

• Overall implementation score obtained based on total item points (Not, Partial, Full)

Page 48: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Before Team Training1. Review Coaching Implementation Checklist (C)

2. Verify coaching role with Coordinator

3. Review coaching role with Principal

4. Review status of team: principal, grade level representatives, special educator, counselor, parent, classified staff members (Committee Review)

5. Ask team to bring discipline data, behavior incident reports, office discipline referral forms, school discipline policy, procedures for teaching school-wide behavior expectations, procedures for encouraging SW expectations, etc.

6. Review tools: Team Implementation Checklist (A), EBS Self-Assessment Survey, Committee Review, Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI), Action Planning

george sugai
Page 49: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

During Team Training

1. Remind team of coaching role

2. Let team lead process

3. Document agreements

4. Keep team on task & reinforce progress

5. Remind team of big ideas (“refrigerator magnets”) from presentations

6. Remind team to include all staff

7. Prompt outcomes: Team Implementation Checklist, Team Action Plan, Committee Review, EBS Self-assessment Survey

Page 50: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

After Team Training1. Acknowledge/reinforce principal & team for progress at training

2. Prompt team to – Meet & review PBS purpose & action plan with staff

– Collect school data

– Meet w/in 1 month

– Complete Team Implementation Checklist 1 month later

3. Contact team leader 2x in first month & ask – What is planned

– if assistance needed

4. Set schedule to attend team meeting 1x month

5. Monitor & assist in development & completion of team action plan

6. Review/complete Coaches Implementation Checklist

7. Document team & coaching accomplishments, speed bumps, challenges, solutions

Page 51: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Challenges/GuidelinesChallenges

• <80% staff commitment & agreement

• Lack of/too much administrative support

• Too many/too few meetings

• Conflicting perspective

• Kids/families responsibility

• No/bad data

• In-/out-house coaching

• Inefficient meetings

• Competing initiatives

Guidelines

• Use data

• Acknowledge/reinforce approximations

• Focus on team

• Provide/use exemplars

• Conduct functional assessment

• Contextualize evidence-based practice

• Consult with coordinator &/or state leadership team

• Model desired practice

Page 52: SW PBS: Training for Coaching Capacity MD PBIS Leadership Team George Sugai & Teri Lewis-Palmer OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut July 18,

Tools (pbis.org)

• EBS Self-assessment

• TIC: Team Implementation Checklist

• SSS: Safe Schools Survey

• SET: Systems School-wide Evaluation Tool

• PBS Implementation & Planning Self-assessment

• ISSET: Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool (pilot)

• SWIS: School-Wide Information System (swis.org)