Top Banner
CPRE Sussex, March 2013 Futureproofing: the National Planning Policy Framework – one year on Neil Sinden, Policy and Campaigns Director, CPRE
19

Sussex cpre march 2013

May 09, 2015

Download

Documents

william1shaw
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sussex cpre  march 2013

CPRE Sussex, March 2013

Futureproofing: the National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Neil Sinden, Policy and

Campaigns Director, CPRE

Page 2: Sussex cpre  march 2013

Futureproofing: the National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

• land use planning system is key tool for ‘futureproofing’

• recent changes to planning law on policy

• CPRE’s campaign to influence these

• identify some of the improvements we helped secure

• focus on some key issues

• outline the findings and recommendations of a recent CPRE report

• introduce a new campaign we will be launching next week

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 3: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

The Localism Act 2011

• Infrastructure Planning Commission abolished

• new procedures for National Policy Statements

• Regional Spatial Strategies abolished

• new duty to cooperate

• non-binding Inspectors’ reports

Page 4: Sussex cpre  march 2013

The Localism Act 2011

• Neighbourhood Plans and Community Right to Build

• Community Infrastructure Levy

• new Homes Bonus

• planning Enforcement Orders

• new powers to deal with unauthorised advertisements

(no community right of appeal)

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 5: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

The National Planning Policy Framework:CPRE’s key asks

• recognise the value of the wider countryside

• retain the ‘brownfield first’ policy

• take a better approach to sustainable development

• reinforce the plan-led system; and

• promote affordable housing delivery

Page 6: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 7: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 8: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 9: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 10: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

The NPPF campaign

• feeding the media with stories

• cooperating with National Trust

• reaching out to unusual partners

• leading Wildlife and Countryside Link’s work on the issue

• surveying local authority views

• researching brownfield and wider countryside issues

• specific projects with RSPB and NT

• working with MPs and Peers

Page 11: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

The final NPPF: significant improvements

• better definition of sustainable development

• core principles recognise:

- intrinsic character and beauty of countryside;- need to use brownfield land; and- transport and land use integration

•stronger policies on town centre vitality

•Green Belt policy largely intact

Page 12: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Sustainable Development: the golden thread or missing link?

• the wrong starting point

• seek integration not balance

• benefits of planning undervalued

• non-market values of land

Page 13: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Sustainable Development: improvements in the NPPF

• reference to UK Sustainable Development Strategy and environmental limits

• greater emphasis on integrating social, economic and environmental objectives

• reframed presumption in favour of sustainable development

• good approach to plan-making: avoid, minimise, mitigate, compensate (para.152)

Page 14: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Protecting the countryside and green spaces: what difference will the NPPF make?

• local green space designation untested

• wider countryside, not just designated areas

• housing land supply requirements – deliverability and viability

• pressure on the Green Belt

• sporadic rural development

Page 15: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Brownfield regeneration: ‘smart growth’or Garden Cities?

• reuse of previously developed land has been a big success

• will local brownfield/density targets be enough?

• design and density should go together

• low density, dispersed development is unsustainable

• more to be done – will Garden Cities help?

Page 16: Sussex cpre  march 2013

Countryside Promises, Planning Realities

• transitional period of 12 months insufficient

• plan-led system is being undermined

• valuable areas of countryside being lost to development

• five year ‘deliverable’ land supply requirement leading to more greenfield development

• role of neighbourhood plans less important than anticipated

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 17: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 18: Sussex cpre  march 2013

Recommendations

• More Government support for getting local plans in place

• Planning guidance to address areas of confusion and weakness

• Longer term, improve policy by:

• a new approach to sustainable development

• new measures to promote urban regeneration

• stronger protections for the countryside

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Page 19: Sussex cpre  march 2013

National Planning Policy Framework – one year on

Save our Countryside:how you can help

• briefing materials for branches/local groups

• use evidence to resist inappropriate devpt

• write to local MPs and ask them to raise concerns with the Planning Minister

• provide evidence of damaging decisions

• write to local newspapers

• encourage local authorities to get plans in place