Top Banner
Student Perspectives on Assistive Technology. E.A. Draffan
16

Student perspectives on assistive technology

Oct 28, 2014

Download

Technology

E.A. Draffan

These slides are from a talk given at the Iansyst 2012 DSA Assessors conference. There are several slides that were asking questions rather than providing answers - the main points were about the shifting sands occurring in IT and AT within Further and Higher Education
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Student Perspectives on Assistive Technology.

E.A. Draffan

Page 2: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Blurring of Technologies

• When does IT become AT? • Future IT Trends a help or a hindrance? • Movement in Traditional AT • Where do we go now?• Mobile phones• eReading • Supporting Students.

Page 3: Student perspectives on assistive technology

When does IT become AT?

• When it is accessible?

• When it has no VAT?

• When it is accepted by SLC?

• When we have the evidence it helps?

Page 4: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Cloud Computing, Mobile Apps, Social

Reading, Tablet Computing

Adaptive Learning Environments,

Augmented Reality, Game-Based Learning,

Learning Analytics

Digital Identity, Gesture-Based

Computing, Haptic Interfaces, Internet of

Things

Future IT Trends a help or a hindrance?

(Horizon Report HE shortlist 2012)

1 year or less

2-3 years

4-5 years

Page 5: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Movement in Traditional AT • TextHelp Read and Write Gold – additional web

apps for four years as a service – Read and Write web, Speech, eBook Reader and Dictionary.

• Dolphin SaySo – Bookshare, Load2Learn etc

• ClaroSoftware compressed TTS with quality from a cloud service - AccessMyStudies – speaking without installation – ATbar

• All making apps e.g. iOS ClaroSpeak (£3.99) – other languages – many uses!

Page 6: Student perspectives on assistive technology

“None of the organisational software was recommended on a basis that it will sync with my mobile devices which are the

only devices I would ever remember to check. My

assessor was aware of this”

Where do we go now?SmartPhone• 79.3% not recommended• 6.1% recommended smartphone of which 3.3%

found very useful• 14.3% did not respond

Tablet• 80% not recommended• 5.3% recommended, 2.7% found very useful• 14.3% did not respond(Student DSA Survey – Wilkinson,S., Viney,D., Draffan,EA 2012)

Page 7: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Mobile Phone survey (2011)

Accessing their websites on a mobile device (number of visits in one month):• iPhone: 1199• Android: 502• iPad: 488• iPod: 154• Other: 178

80% of those who responded had a smart phone. Of that 80% the breakdown was as follows:• Android: 42.3%• Blackberry 34.6%• iPhone: 11.5%• Windows: 3.8%• Other: 7.7%

(http://www.in-traction.com/mobile-browsing-a-student-survey/)

Page 8: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Comments – Aspirations“An iPad. I have since self funded for one and it really helps. I use it to take notes sketching internet and for keynote presentations. I also use the reminder facility and calendar for short term memory.”

“a smart phone/ iPad of some kind which is light and

easy to carry round with me which would help me

organise myself.”

“I was not aware that there was an option for a tablet to be provided it would be very useful to have been able to use this during lectures

and practicals to take notes and to access notes/research that I have prepared in

advance.”

Page 9: Student perspectives on assistive technology

eReading

“I wasn't recommended an ereader …I haven't got one yet and am not sure how many of the things I need to read are available on them, but it is something I am considering as they are smaller lighter and more convenient than my big text books and I think they might be easier to

look at.”

“An eReader would have helped me

organise my reading and

research much better.”

(2012 survey)

Page 10: Student perspectives on assistive technology

iPad versus Kindle study

• Reed College 2011– Legibility - size, contrast, and resolution – only

one had eyestrain and no comment on difference to e-ink of Kindle

– Touch screen – speed over joystick and keyboard– Portability, Durability and Battery life – both good

compared to laptops– Paper saving – annotations possible on iPad– Referring to texts in class v distraction of emails!http://www.reed.edu/cis/about/ipad_pilot/index.html

Page 11: Student perspectives on assistive technology

eReading storms brewing

• Over 150 eReader/eBook applications/software available on varying platforms

• Limited outlets for eBooks in UK esp FREE ePublications – Load2Learn Project

• Unable to determine if an eBook is accessible until after the product is purchased.

• Copyright legislation – text to speech availability. • eReader comparison

http://ereaderleader.com/ereader-comparison/

Page 12: Student perspectives on assistive technology

eReading accessibility

• Desktop - Adobe Digital Editions 1.8 & Kindle for PC Accessibility Plug-in (USA)

• Web based – Kindle Cloud Reader and ePub reader Firefox extension – Bookworm closed.

• Apps tied to bookstores such as Read2Go for Bookshare and Blio for Kurzweil – inDaisy reads any Daisy files also Voice of DAISY.

• Apps – iBooks with VoiceOver, Stanza, Kobo for large fonts and colour changes etc.

Page 13: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Supporting Students

• Training take up remains around 40-50%

Page 14: Student perspectives on assistive technology

• Drop in centres• More expertise to cope with the world of IT/AT

mobile, cloud as well as desktop.

Student expectations

“it wasn't training I wasn't taught anything everything that he 'taught' me I already knew

he just downloaded rubbish onto my computer and made it so slow that I can

barely use it!”

Page 15: Student perspectives on assistive technology

App Support

• Device specific apps – standards, variable accessibility and questionable life in the market place with flexi-updates.

• Google apps – Docs better than spread sheets, Presentation better than the Calendar – used in USA education so accessibility improving

• Web apps – HTML5 – cross platform - potential for accessibility guidelines good.

Page 16: Student perspectives on assistive technology

Can we help?

• http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk • Research – evidence based – LexDis• Free and open source – ATbar – 2nd version just

released, Accessible pen drive menu for portable apps.

• Give us your new ideas on www.realisepotential.org • Testing Web 2.0 services – www.web2access.org

Thank You