Student Achievement Data 2013-2014 Data by School Board of Education Presentation October 14, 2014 1.

Student Achievement Data2013-2014

Data by School

Board of Education PresentationOctober 14, 2014

1

2

GRADE 3 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

ELA – GRADE 3

Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

26.4% 24.2%30.5%

10.0%

36.5%

47.4%

19.6%29.4%

15.4%

20.2% 21.1%

5.6%

42.4% 44.0%

26.2% 26.3%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 31.1%2013-14: 31.8%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 42.6%2013-14: 42.4%

3

GRADE 4 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

ELA – GRADE 4

Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

42.7%

23.3% 27.9%18.8%

31.6%

40.7%

27.3%

32.0%

21.3% 19.4%

43.6%

15.2%

30.6%

54.3%

25.5% 30.9%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 30.3%2013-14: 33.2%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 39.5%2013-14: 42.2%

4

GRADE 5 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

ELA – GRADE 5

Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

27.6%

14.8%

26.5%

8.2%

24.1%

41.0%

20.3% 23.1%

28.2%

18.6%25.9%

8.2%

26.7%30.4%

10.3%

23.2%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 30.2%2013-14: 29.7%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 36.7%2013-14: 35.5%

5

GRADE 6 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

ELA – GRADE 6

Franklin MS

Hoover MS Kenmore MS

District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.340.325

0.4330.368

20.5% 24.1% 24.5% 23.1%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 29.6%2013-14: 28.9%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 41.6%2013-14: 36.4%

6

GRADE 7 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

ELA – GRADE 7

Franklin MS

Hoover MS Kenmore MS

District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.3

0.3520.372

0.343

20.8% 21.4% 22.8% 21.7%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 31.4%2013-14: 29.5%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 41.5%2013-14: 34.6%

7

GRADE 8 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

ELA – GRADE 8

Franklin MS

Hoover MS Kenmore MS

District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.370.417

0.34 0.37637.1% 36.8% 34.7% 36.1%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 33.7%2013-14: 35.5%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 46.7%2013-14: 41.7%

8

GRADE 3 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

MATH – GRADE 3

Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

26.4%20.6%

33.9%

16.0%

37.2%

42.3%

25.5% 30.7%

36.7%

25.5%

42.9%

17.3%

55.3%60.0%

41.0% 40.6%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 34.2%2013-14: 42.2%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 43.6%2013-14: 53.1%

9

GRADE 4 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

MATH – GRADE 4

Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

42.7%

30.1%

41.0%

10.4%

34.0%

57.4%

30.2%38.2%

27.9%31.9%

47.3%

21.3%

35.7%

67.9%

43.1% 40.1%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 36.3%2013-14: 42.6%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 47.5%2013-14: 52.1%

10

GRADE 5 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

MATH – GRADE 5

Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

26.7%18.2%

22.1%

8.2%15.7%

50.8%

10.9%

21.9%

46.5% 41.4%

31.0%22.5%

41.1%

64.3%

35.9%43.0%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 29.9%2013-14: 40.0%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 34.9%2013-14: 47.5%

11

GRADE 6 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

MATH – GRADE 6

Franklin MS

Hoover MS Kenmore MS

District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.295 0.304

0.2230.27223.5%

30.0%24.5% 26.3%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 30.6%2013-14: 38.1%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 35.9%2013-14: 41.8%

12

GRADE 7 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

MATH – GRADE 7

Franklin MS

Hoover MS Kenmore MS

District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.2350.277

0.256 0.255

34.3% 32.7% 31.7% 32.7%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 27.7%2013-14: 32.9%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 35.5%2013-14: 40.4%

13

GRADE 8 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

MATH – GRADE 8

Franklin MS

Hoover MS Kenmore MS

District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.28 0.315

0.2460.281

15.8%10.8%

4.2%10.0%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 27.4%2013-14: 22.2%

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 37.5%2013-14: 21.8%

14

GRADE 4 SCIENCE PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

SCIENCE – GRADE 4

Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%100.0%

93.1% 95.1%

83.7%

97.0% 97.2% 100.0%96.1%

84.4%

93.2% 96.3%

76.1%

93.1%93.9%

92.3% 90.3%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 90.0%2013-14: Not Available

ERIE 1 AVG2012-13: 95.7%2013-14: 94.1%

15

GRADE 8 SCIENCE PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4

SCIENCE – GRADE 8

Franklin MS

Hoover MS Kenmore MS

District Avg

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.807 0.8340.813 0.818

64.4%

80.9%

65.3%70.3%

2012-13 2013-14

NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 73.0%2013-14: Not Available

ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 87.1%2013-14: 79.9 %

16

ELA REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

56% 54%48%

54%

40%

36%

64%

35%37%

36%

42%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 92%KW 89%ERIE 1 92%

% PASSING 13-14KE 64%KW 85%ERIE 1 92%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 47% 13-14 48%

17

ELA COMMON CORE

13-14 KE 13-14 KW 13-14 Dist0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

24% 27% 25%

34% 31%31%

24% 32%28%

% 85-100 % 74-84 % 65-73

% PASSING 13-14KE 82%KW 90%ERIE 1 84%

% MASTERY ERIE 113-14 32%

18

INTEGRATED ALGEBRA REGENTS

12-1

3 F

MS

13-1

4 F

MS

12-1

3...

13-1

4...

12-1

3...

13-1

4...

12-1

3 K

E

13-1

4 K

E

12-1

3 K

W

13-1

4 K

W

12-1

3 D

ist

13-1

4 D

ist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

67%70%

62%

47%

47%

18% 20%

2%9%

1%

26%18%

33%

30%38%

53% 53%

81%72%

61%

76%

52%

65%

58%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 92%KW 85%ERIE 1 91%

% PASSING 13-14KE 63%KW 53%ERIE 1 86%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 33% 13-14 25%

19

INTEGRATED ALGEBRA COMMON CORE

13-14 FMS 13-14 HMS 13-14 KMS 13-14 KE 13-14 KW 13-14 Dist0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

70%

34% 43%

16%

13%20%

30%

62%57%

69%63%

60%

4% 1% 1% 1%

% 85-100 % 74-84 % 65-73

% PASSING 13-14KE 86%KW 77%ERIE 1 85%

% MASTERY ERIE 113-14 7%

20

ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

21% 22%16% 16% 18% 18%

43%

56%

32%

48%36%

51%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 64%KW 48%ERIE 1 78%

% PASSING 13-14KE 78%KW 64%ERIE 1 80%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 40% 13-14 40%

21

GEOMETRY REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

25% 27%21%

14%23% 19%

66%55%

59%61%

62%59%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 91%KW 80%ERIE 1 87%

% PASSING 13-14KE 82%KW 75%ERIE 1 87%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 36% 13-14 40%

22

GLOBAL HISTORY REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

30%

43%38% 39% 35%

41%

52%35% 44% 39% 47% 37%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 82%KW 82%ERIE 1 87%

% PASSING 13-14KE 78%KW 78%ERIE 1 81%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 45% 13-14 44%

23

U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

70%

56%66%

55%

68%

55%

23%

35%

26%35%

25%

35%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 93%KW 92%ERIE 1 94%

% PASSING 13-14KE 91%KW 90%ERIE 1 93%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 68% 13-14 65%

24

LIVING ENVIRONMENT REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

36%46% 42% 39% 39% 41%

57%45%

47% 51% 51% 49%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 93%KW 89%ERIE 1 93%

% PASSING 13-14KE 91%KW 90%ERIE 1 92%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 51% 13-14 50%

25

EARTH SCIENCE REGENTS

12-1

3 F

MS

13-1

4 F

MS

12-1

3...

13-1

4...

12-1

3...

13-1

4...

12-1

3 K

E

13-1

4 K

E

12-1

3 K

W

13-1

4 K

W

12-1

3 D

ist

13-1

4 D

ist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

61%

73%

88%

60%

45%46%

21%

10%

21%

32% 31%

39%

27%

12%

40%

52% 52%

44%

52%

49%

44% 48%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 65%KW 70%ERIE 1 86%

% PASSING 13-14KE 62%KW 0%ERIE 1 86%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 45% 13-14 48%

26

CHEMISTRY REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

17% 16%10%

5%13% 10%

72%

60%

56%52%

63%

55%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 89%KW 66%ERIE 1 87%

% PASSING 13-14KE 76%KW 57%ERIE 1 82%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 25% 13-14 24%

27

PHYSICS REGENTS

12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist

13-14 Dist

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

14% 10% 12%

26%

13% 16%

53%

22%

53%

52%

53%33%

% 85-100 % 65-84

% PASSING 12-13KE 67%KW 65%ERIE 1 85%

% PASSING 13-14KE 32%KW 78%ERIE 1 84%

% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 37% 13-14 41%

28

NEXT STEPS

A Coordinated District eff ort will include:Alignment of School Instructional Improvement Plans

to District Goals/Strategic Intents and DTSDE RubricA viable curriculum that is aligned with State

standards and assessmentsA focus on the single greatest determinant of

learning…the classroom teacher’s instructionTargeted professional development Utilization of allotted planning time to review goals

and progress targets by grade level, course and/or department

Exploration of realigning resources for teaching & learning

29

QUESTIONS?