Strengthening Food Security in Tribal Areas Centre for Sustainable Agriculture Tribal's symbiotic relationship with forests. Forests provided food, fodder and fuel. Natural and customary rights of tribal's. Ecological degradation with newer crops/practices
18
Embed
Strengthening Agriculture in Tribal and Hill Areas
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Strengthening Food Security in Tribal Areas
Centre for Sustainable Agriculture
Tribal's symbiotic relationship with forests.Forests provided food, fodder and fuel.Natural and customary rights of tribal's.Ecological degradation with newer crops/practices
Forest management: Historical Changes
• Free access to forest resources: Except patches for royal hunting.
• No intervention by the state.• Changing times; relationship between forest &
forest communities: institutionalized through various cultural & religious mechanisms.
• Encouraged restraint & cautioning in using forest as a resource base.
Forest management in British India
• 1865: First Indian Forest Act passed by Supreme Legislative Council.
• Declaring forests and wastelands as reserved forests.• 1878: Act was further strengthened by Forest Act.• Empowered state FD to close reserve forests to people and
impose penalties for any transgression of the act.• “rights” became “privileges” over night.• Forest Act 1927 further denied any customary right of forest
communities over forests.• Served imperial interests • Denied minimum subsistence needs of forest communities.
Forest Policies after Indian Independence
• 1952:National Forest Policy.• Retained fundamental orientation of colonial forest
policies.• State monopoly over rights.• Over the decades: spate of legislations have come up
geared towards conservation of forests and wild life in India.
• The Wildlife Protection Act : 1972.• The Forest Conservation Act of 1980 & subsequent
amendments.
Forest Act & Its Impact on Tribal Communities
• Moral conflict: Tribal's Customary Rights & Commercially Oriented Forest Policies.
• Supplemented their primary means of subsistence by collecting NTFP.
• State’s increasing control over forests.• Deprived of their livelihood• Undermining their customary relationship with
forests.
Development Imperatives
• Forest resources: acquired commodity value at the expense of their subsistence value to forest communities.
• Accelerating food in-security in tribal areas. • Needs of forest communities were cornered.• Clash: Commercialization and Centralization of forest
resources with subsistence needs of forest communities and Commercial Agriculture making in roads
• Farm based occupations account for nearly 55% of their needs primary source of income.
• Reasons for weakening of food security in tribal areas– land alienation, deforestation, decline in livestock, actual
wages, work availability , development projects and conservation of forests and wild life.
• Extensive deforestation, climatic variations, change in traditional economy impacting their food security issues.
• Deprivation to land, water, food and natural resources. • There is a constant struggle for their survival.• Unable to get sufficient food and nutritious food.
– conditions of semi-starvation.– hunger continues to persist on mass scale and is assuming dehumanizing
proportions.– food security to be build on ecological security.
• Food security is an important means to realize their right to food.
• Migration has become as an alternative
Hill & Tribal Agriculture in AP
• Andhra Pradesh has 50.24 lakhs tribal population which constitutes 6.59% of state’s population of 762.10 lakhs (census 2001)
• Tribal areas are characterized by their fragile ecosystem. These areas are home for various brooks, streams, medicinal plants and other living forms
• Agriculture though main activity is not supporting fully their livelihoods. Hence they depend on seasonal fruits, NTFP and labour for their livelihood.
• Any intervention in these areas will have a larger impact on the ecosystem as the interactions much more compared to the plain lands
In Araku Valley area
• High rainfall areas• Stream bed paddy cultivation• Small holdings and distributed holdings• Low yields• 2 – 3 months hunger period• 2 months fodder deficit• Pesticide is not a major problem• Seed is not a major problem
Soil productivity Management• Soil is understood as strata to hold plants• Plants as nutrient mining systems• Only available nutrients are measured• External nutrient application-no measure of
utilisation• Soil-chemical, biological and physical properties• Biomass application is also seen as external nutrient
• “Gobor Porbo”: a festival of manure• “Dongor Porbo”: hill festival• Locally suitable crops and practices– SRI in paddy– Millets
Gobor Porob and Dongor PorobSeasonal biomass for compostingTaking the cultural route – Gobor porob – during Sept-Oct months4mx2mx1.5m size heaps.Though the festival was done in one day it took almost 3 days to
completeAbout 1 ton compost from heap was harvested. This is in addition to
their traditional pit compost/manureInitially trees, weeds were used later bund plantation with gliricidia was
done800 heaps in total were made in about 50 villages/hamletsIncentive was community lunchGreen manuresJeevamritMixed cropping
Gobor porob
Leaves of various trees• Raavi• Maavidi• Sikkini• Kasavinda• Tagaranchi• Saema• Kumbi• Madi• Sirimanu• Rella• Karaka• Pittarodda• Dolla(Jatropha)