Top Banner
SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008
13

SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Morris King
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

SSuN Cycle 2

SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation

Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle

December 4, 2008

Page 2: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Agenda

• Overview, objectives, potential questions• New York City: Lessons Learned• Proposed Methodology• Review of current SSuN STD clinic

screening and testing practices• Specimen collection and transport

* Break *• Data Elements• Data use and dissemination• Human subjects review considerations

Page 3: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

SSuN Laboratory Component Objectives

• To establish a network of STD clinics with high quality laboratory and clinical capacity to implement a broad range of STD surveillance activities• First Part B activity: trichomonas resistance

• Future activities• Depend on public health importance and

availability of funding

Page 4: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Trichomonas Resistance Activity Objectives

• To improve control of Trichomonas vaginalis infection through:

- 1o: Identifying the prevalence of in vitro antibiotic resistance in this population

- 2o: Describing the prevalence, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics of women with T. vaginalis infection attending STD clinics

Page 5: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

• What is the prevalence of trichomoniasis in women attending STD clinics?- Does it vary by region? Age? Race/ethnicity? HIV

status? Other variables?

• What is the prevalence of T. vaginalis resistance in this population?- Does it vary by population?- Is there a relationship between symptoms and in vitro

findings?- Does resistance differ for wet prep(+) vs. wet prep(-)?- What is the local sensitivity of wet preps (compared to

InPouch TV culture)?- Is there an association with resistance and recent

antibiotic use or recent treatment for trich?

Potential Trichomonas ResistanceAnalytic Questions

Page 6: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Trichomonas Resistance Activity: Proposed Methodology

• Goal: Each site to send 60 positive trich cultures to CDC per year for susceptibility testing ~ 10-20% expected to die in transport ► 50 viable cxs/year

• Include all women attending sentinel STD clinics who undergo a speculum exam, including• Asymptomatic • those without discharge on exam• wet prep negative

• Wet prep and inoculation of InPouch for all women• Treat women based on wet prep and culture results

Page 7: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

• Send InPouch to local laboratory for culture• Send all positive T. vaginalis cultures to CDC for

aerobic susceptibility testing• Metronidazole and tinidazole

Trichomonas Resistance Monitoring: Proposed Methodology

Page 8: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Information from SSuN STD clinics

• Estimated number of speculum exams performed per week

• What are standard practices for trich screening in asymptomatic women or women without vaginal discharge?

• Do any clinics currently culture for trich and in what situations?

• What treatment regimen is used for trichomonas infection?

Page 9: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Logistical Sampling Considerations

Specimen Collection and Transport• CDC cannot accept specimens on weekend

• For large volume sites: Collection on Thursdays & Fridays?• Ship overnight express to CDC on Mondays & Tuesdays?• Transfer culture specimens to allow batching of shipments?• Local lab culture storage constraints?

• CDC lab capacity limitations (~15-20/week)• How to stagger specimen collection/transport to avoid

overload• Need to send Coinfection information?• What specimen collection/transport processes will

work in participating clinics?

Page 10: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Current Trichomonas Volume in SSuN Sites

Site Year collected

Specimen Test

# positives

Prevalence Notes

Birmingham Est. annual

Culture ~1700 25% Estimation of # cases based on research data of 25% prevalence; ~ 6 cases/day (=1700/260); ~30 cases/week

DMHC, Denver 2007 ? 224 ~0.9 cases/day (=224/260); ~4.5 cases/week

NYC 2006 Wet mount

~600 All BSTDC clinics, ~2.3 cases/day for all clinics, ~11.5 cases/week

NYC 2008 Culture 17/110 15% One clinic, January 1 – April 16, 2008, ~0.2 cases/days (=17/75 business days); ~ 1 case/week

San Francisco City Clinic

2006 ? 88 82 (93%) diagnosed among women; 82 cases /260 days = 0.3 cases/day; ~1.5 cases/week

DHC # 1 Philadelphia

2006 Wet mount

630 630/260 = 2.4 cases/day = ~12 cases/week

DHC # 1 Philadelphia

2007 Wet mount

774

Harborview, Seattle

2007 ? 116 116/260 = 0.45 cases/day = ~2 cases/week

Page 11: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Variables for Trichomonas Resistance Activity

• Patient ID• Date of visit• Visit Type• Age• Race/Ethnicity• Sexual Orientation• Pregnancy• County or other

localization data• HIV status• Crude STD symptom

variable• Diagnostic codes• Lab results

• Trich history• BV history• Trich-Specific symptoms

• Discharge or • Odor or • Itching

• Physical exam findings• Vaginal discharge

Core STD Clinic Variables Trich-specific Variables

Page 12: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Data Dissemination

• Mechanism for returning susceptibility results to the site

Page 13: SSuN Cycle 2 SSuN Part B Laboratory Component: Trichomonas Resistance Evaluation Bob Kirkcaldy, Lori Newman, Kristen Mahle December 4, 2008.

Human Subjects Review Considerations

Is the proposed methodology still surveillance?

Will participant consent be needed?