Spanish Advanced 6 Anglia Ruskin University Language Centre Faculty: Arts, Law and Social Sciences Module Code: AD115112S AD215112S AD315112S 1
Spanish Advanced 6
Anglia Ruskin University Language CentreFaculty: Arts, Law and Social Sciences
Module Code: AD115112S AD215112SAD315112S
Academic Year: 2009/10Semester 2
1
Contents
1. Key Information
2. Introduction to the Module
3. Intended Learning Outcomes
4. Outline Delivery (including attendance requirements)
5. Assessment
6. Anglia Ruskin Generic Assessment Criteria and Marking Standards
7. Assessment Offences
8. Learning Resources
8.1 Recommended Texts8.2 Recommended Internet resources8.3 Other Resources
9. Module Definition Form
10. Report on last delivery of Module
2
1. Key Information
Module/Unit title: Spanish Advanced 6
Module Leader: Name: Dr Alicia Peña CalvoCambridge, Helmore 354Extension: 2043Email: [email protected]
2. Introduction to the ModuleThis is the fourth in a series of advanced language modules in Spanish and it contributes to the attainment of the level C2 of the Common European Framework. The module is compulsory for students following a Spanish pathway at this linguistic level but is open to all others who have the appropriate level of Spanish. This module focuses on advanced productive and receptive use of Spanish using a variety of language materials and diverse activities and tasks. This is a challenging module which aims to extend proficiency in Spanish making use of a wide and appropriate linguistic repertoire, while expanding the knowledge of contemporary issues in the Hispanic world. It also aims at further developing analytical, problem-solving and communication skills related to academic tasks which can also be applied to job situations. Two hours per week will be spent in class participating in Spanish in a variety of activities such as such as group debates and discussions, presentations, listening exercises sourced from authentic audio and audio-visual material, critical reading of a variety of literary and journalistic genres, using monolingual dictionaries, etc. Assessment methods consist of coursework, which may take the form of essays, research projects, in-class tests, reports or an oral presentation and an exam.
3. Intended Learning OutcomesOn successful completion of this module you will be able to:
1. Perform proficiently in spoken and written Spanish, demonstrated through critical evaluation of aspects of the contemporary cultures and societies of the Hispanic world.
2. Apply language skills effectively and appropriately in a broad variety of contexts including job-related and academic ones.
3. Write different types of texts (e.g. summaries, reviews, reports, academic essays etc), following appropriate structures and conventions, selecting and making critical use of written and spoken sources.
4. Use a variety of sources to determine the reliability of information and to present and justify opinions and arguments.
4. Outline Delivery
3
Unidad Comunicación Gramática & Vocabulario
Unidad 7
Propuestas de ocio
Preguntar y hablar de la habilidad para hacer algo
Ofrecer, invitar, proponer, sugerir una actividad
Aceptar una propuesta, un ofrecimiento, una invitación
Rechazar una propuesta, un ofrecimiento o una invitación
Presente de subjuntivo para proponer planes y hacer sugerencias
Pretérito imperfecto de subjuntivo en oraciones subordinadas que expresan deseos
Perífrasis verbales de infinitivo, gerundio, participio
Oraciones temporales: antes de (que), nada más, mientras
El modo en las oraciones temporales
Actividades de ocio
Juegos de mesa
Deportes
Heridas y traumatismos
Unidad 8
De casa
Pedir permiso
Dar y denegar permiso
Prohibir
Rechazar una prohibición
Advertir
Amenazar
Expresar alivio
Quejarse del funcionamiento de un servicio
Reclamar
Usos del subjuntivo
Oraciones consecutivas: aunque, a pesar de (que), por mucho que …
El modo en las oraciones concesivas
Cuantificadores: la mitad, todo, cuanto…
Tareas domésticas
Expresiones y frases hechas
Compra y alquiler de una vivienda
4
Unidad 9
Rituales y tradiciones
Felicitar
Formular buenos deseos
Expresar nerviosismo
Dar el pésame
Expresar resignación
Tranquilizar y consolar
Expresar halagos, cumplidos y piropos
La concordancia ad sensum (según el sentido)
Asíndeton y polisíndeton
Al + infinitivo
Variaciones en el orden oracional sujeto-verbo-objeto (SVO)
ProyectoProyecto 1: El teatro de la vida Repaso 6-9
Unidad 10
¿Vives para trabajar?
Expresar hartazgo
Expresar decepción
Expresar arrepentimiento
Expresar sorpresa y extrañeza
Aconsejar
Animar
Oraciones finales: para (que), a fin (de) que, con el propósito de (que)…
El modo en las oraciones finales
Los artículos definidos e indefinidos
Expresiones y frases hechas relacionadas con el trabajo
Medidas de conciliación de la vida laboral y familiar
El trabajo
Las profesiones
Unidad 11
Ciudadanos activos
Responder a una orden, petición o ruego accediendo o negándose a su cumplimiento y eludiendo el compromiso
Expresar aprobación y desaprobación
Preguntar si se está de acuerdo
Invitar al cuerdo
Expresar acuerdo
Expresar desacuerdo
Presentar un contraargumento
Adverbios en –mente
Estilo indirecto: cambios en los tiempos verbales
Campañas de concienciación
Infracciones
Incidentes
Acciones relacionadas con la burocracia
Instituciones políticas
Cargos públicos
Verbos que interpretan y resumen enunciados e intenciones
5
Unidad 12
Amigos del arte
Citar
Introducir un nuevo tema
Destacar un elemento
Interrumpir
Pedir información
Corregir una información previa
Presente histórico
Pretérito imperfecto con marcador temporal de presente o futuro
Futuro imperfecto con valor de objeción o rechazo
Condicional simple con valor de objeción o rechazo en el pasado
Futuro perfecto con valor de objeción o rechazo en el pasado
Oraciones consecutivas: de tal modo que, así que, por lo tanto …
Las preposiciones por y para
Valoraciones de obras artísticas
Estilos artísticos
Música
ProyectoProyecto 2: La vuelta ciclista al español
Repaso Unidades 6 - 12
ASSESSMENT
week 6 & week 12
In-class writing/grammar in context/reading*
in-class listening & speaking
Attendance Requirements:
International students who are non-EEA nationals and in possession of entryclearance/leave to remain as a student (student visa) are required to bein regular attendance at Anglia Ruskin. Failure to do so is considered tobe a breach of the immigration regulations. From the academic year 2008/09onwards, Anglia Ruskin is required to inform the Border and ImmigrationAgency (Home Office) of significant unauthorised absences by any studentvisa holders.
5. Assessment
Assessment Method % contribution tomodule mark or
P/F
LearningOutcomes
Coursework (may include more than task e.g. oral/aural/written)3,000 words equivalent.
100% 1-4
Week 6 (01/03/10): Grammar-vocabulary/ reading comprehension/ writing tasks
*Easter break: Readings to prepare during the Easter Break as stimulus for writing and speaking
6
Week 12 (03/05/10): Listening / speaking / grammar-vocabulary in context tasks in class assessment.
6. Assessment Criteria and Marking Standards
Note to students: The university assessment criteria for Level 1 / 2 / 3 follows at the end of this document.
A (70% -) Achievement all three criteria to a near-professional standardB (6 - 69%) Above average performance in all three criteria.C (50 - 59%) Satisfactory achievement in all three criteria.D (40 – 49%) Criteria 1 and 2 are minimally satisfied and there are problems
with Criterion 3 (Accuracy) E (below 40%) Fails to satisfy the above criteria.
7
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND MARKING STANDARDSLEVEL 1
GenericLearning
Outcomes
(Academic Regulations,
Regulation 2.26-2.41.2)
Assessment criteria by levelMarking standards (by mark band)
70%+ 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 1-29%
Characteristics of student achievement per mark band →
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves a marginal pass in the module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Fails marginally to achieve module outcome/s related to this GLO. MDF may permit compensation
Fails to achieve module outcome/s related to this GLO and is not eligible for compensation
Kn
ow
led
ge,
Un
der
stan
din
g a
nd
In
telle
ctu
al S
kills
Level 1 (Certificate) introduces students to HE. Students are expected to demonstrate relevant skills and competencies; to be articulate in expressing ideas orally; and to be coherent and structured in terms of written or other media. Forms of expression at this level may be descriptive or imitative, but students are expected to demonstrate an increasing understanding of the theoretical background of their study and the analytic competence to explore it, as well as its relationship, where appropriate, to particular skills. Students are expected to develop an awareness of strengths and weaknesses in their skill sets
Excellent information base, exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with considerable originality. Very good academic/ intellectual skills
Good information base; explores and analyses the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with some originality. Good academic/ intellectual skills
Satisfactory information base that begins to explore and analyse the discipline and its ethical issues but is still mainly imitative. Acceptable academic/ intellectual skills
Basic information base; omissions in understanding of major / ethical issues. Largely imitative. Some difficulties with academic/ intellectual skills
Limited information base; limited understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension. Weak academic/ intellectual skills
Inadequate information base; lack of understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension. Wholly imitative. Very weak academic/ intellectual skills
Tra
nsf
erab
le a
nd
Pra
ctic
al S
kills
Level 1 (Certificate) introduces students to HE. Students are expected to demonstrate relevant skills and competencies; to be articulate in expressing ideas orally; and to be coherent and structured in terms of written or other media. Forms of expression at this level may be descriptive or imitative, but students are expected to demonstrate an increasing understanding of the theoretical background of their study and the analytic competence to explore it, as well as its relationship, where appropriate, to particular skills. Students are expected to develop an awareness of strengths and weaknesses in their skill sets
Excellent management of learning resources, complemented by self-direction/ exploration. Structured/ accurate expression. Very good team/ practical/ professional skills
Good management of learning resources with some self-direction. Structured and mainly accurate expression. Good team/ practical/ professional skills
Satisfactory use of learning resources and input to team work. Some lack of structure/accuracy in expression. Satisfactory practical/professional skills
Basic use of learning resources with no self-direction. Some input to team work. Some difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression. Developing practical/ professional skills
Limited use of learning resources, No self-direction, little input to team work and difficulty with structure/ accuracy in expression. Practical/ professional skills are not yet secure
Inadequate use of learning resources. Failure to contribute to team work. Major problems with structure/ accuracy in expression. Very weak practical /professional skills
A mark of 0% may be awarded for non-submission, poor or dangerous practice, incoherent and insufficient work, and in situations where the student fails to address the assignment brief and related learning outcomes
6
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND MARKING STANDARDSLEVEL 2
GenericLearning
Outcomes
(Academic Regulations,
Regulation 2.26-2.41.2)
Assessment criteria by levelMarking standards (by mark band)
70%+ 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 1-29%
Characteristics of studentachievement per mark band →
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves a marginal pass in the module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Fails marginally to achieve module outcome/s related to this GLO. MDF may permit compensation
Fails to achieve module outcome/s related to this GLO and is not eligible for compensation
Kn
ow
led
ge,
Un
der
stan
din
g
and
Inte
llect
ual
Ski
lls
Level 2 (Diploma) reflects continuing development from Level 1. At this level students are not fully autonomous but are able to take responsibility for their own learning with some direction. Students are expected to locate an increasingly detailed theoretical knowledge of the discipline within a more general intellectual context, and to demonstrate this through forms of expression which go beyond the merely descriptive or imitative. Students are expected to demonstrate analytical competence in terms both of problem identification and resolution, and to develop their skill sets as required.
Excellent knowledge base, exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with considerable originality and autonomy. Very good academic/ intellectual skills
Good knowledge base; explores and analyses the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with some originality, detail and autonomy. Good academic/ intellectual skills
Satisfactory knowledge base that begins to explore and analyse the theory and ethical issues of the discipline. Acceptable level of academic/ intellectual skills, going beyond description at times
Basic knowledge base with some omissions and/or lack of theory of discipline and its ethical dimension. Some difficulties with academic/ intellectual skills. Largely imitative and descriptive.
Limited knowledge base; limited understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension. Weak academic/ intellectual skills. Still mainly imitative and descriptive.
Inadequate knowledge base; lack of understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension. Very weak academic/ intellectual skills. Wholly imitative and descriptive.
Tra
nsf
erab
le a
nd
Pra
ctic
al S
kills
Level 2 (Diploma) reflects continuing development from Level 1. At this level students are not fully autonomous but are able to take responsibility for their own learning with some direction. Students are expected to locate an increasingly detailed theoretical knowledge of the discipline within a more general intellectual context, and to demonstrate this through forms of expression which go beyond the merely descriptive or imitative. Students are expected to demonstrate analytical competence in terms both of problem identification and resolution, and to develop their skill sets as required.
Excellent management of learning, with a degree of autonomy/ exploration that may exceed the brief. Structured/ accurate expression. Very good team/ practical/ professional skills
Good management of learning with consistent self-direction. Structured and mainly accurate expression. Good team/ practical/ professional skills
Satisfactory use of learning resources. Acceptable structure/accuracy in expression. Satisfactory team/ practical/professional skills. Inconsistent self-direction
Basic use of learning resources with little self-direction. Some input to team work. Some difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression, but developing practical/ professional skills
Limited use of learning resources, working towards self-direction. General difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression. Team/ practical/ professional skills that are not yet secure
Inadequate use of learning resources. Major problems with structure/ accuracy in expression. Very weak team/ practical /professional skills. No ability to direct own learning
A mark of 0% may be awarded for non-submission, poor or dangerous practice, incoherent and insufficient work, and in situations where the student fails to address the assignment brief and related learning outcomes
7
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND MARKING STANDARDS
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 3GenericLearning
Outcomes
(Academic Regulations,
Regulation 2.26-2.41.2)
Assessment criteria by levelMarking standards (by mark band)
70%+ 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 1-29%
Characteristics of studentachievement per mark band →
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Achieves a marginal pass in the module outcome/s related to this GLO at this Level of Study
Fails marginally to achieve module outcome/s related to this GLO. MDF may permit compensation
Fails to achieve module outcome/s related to this GLO and is not eligible for compensation
Kn
ow
led
ge,
Un
der
stan
din
g
and
Inte
llect
ual
Ski
lls
Level 3 (Degree) is characterised by an expectation of students’ increasing autonomy in relation to their study and developing skill sets. Students are expected to demonstrate problem solving skills, both theoretical and practical. This is supported by an understanding of appropriate theory; creativity of expression and thought based in individual judgement; and the ability to seek out, invoke, analyse and evaluate competing theories or methods of working in a critically constructive and open manner. Output includes is articulate, coherent and skilled in the appropriate medium, with some students producing original or innovative work in their specialism.
Excellent knowledge base that supports analysis, evaluation and problem-solving in theory/practice/ ethics of discipline with considerable originality. Very good academic/ intellectual skills
Good knowledge base that supports analysis, evaluation and problem-solving in theory/ practice/ ethics of discipline with some originality. Good academic/ intellectual skills
Satisfactory knowledge base that supports some analysis, evaluation and problem-solving in theory/practice/ ethics of discipline. Acceptable level of academic/ intellectual skills going beyond description at times
Basic knowledge base with some omissions at the level of theoretical/ethical issues. Some difficulties with academic/ intellectual skills. Restricted ability to discuss theory and/or or solve problems in discipline
Limited knowledge base; limited understanding of discipline/ethical issues. Weak academic/ intellectual skills. Still mainly descriptive. Difficulty with theory and problem solving in discipline
Inadequate knowledge base; lack of understanding of discipline/ethical issues. Very weak academic/ intellectual skills. Unable to discuss theory or solve problems in discipline.
Tra
nsf
erab
le a
nd
Pra
ctic
al S
kills
Level 3 (Degree) is characterised by an expectation of students’ increasing autonomy in relation to their study and developing skill sets. Students are expected to demonstrate problem solving skills, both theoretical and practical. This is supported by an understanding of appropriate theory; creativity of expression and thought based in individual judgement; and the ability to seek out, invoke, analyse and evaluate competing theories or methods of working in a critically constructive and open manner. Output is articulate, coherent and skilled in the appropriate medium, with some students producing original or innovative work in their specialism.
Excellent management of learning, with degree of autonomy/ research that may exceed the assessment brief. Structured and creative expression. Very good practical/ team/professional/ problem-solving skills
Good management of learning, with consistent self-directed research. Structured and accurate expression. Good team/practical/ professional/problem solving skills
Satisfactory management of learning. Some autonomy in research but inconsistent. Structured and mainly accurate expression. Satisfactory team/ practical/professional/ problem-solving skills
Basic use of learning resources with little autonomy. Some difficulty with structure/ accuracy in expression, but evidence of developing team/ practical/ professional/ problem-solving skills
Limited use of learning resources. Unable to work autonomously. Little input to teams. General difficulty with structure/ accuracy in expression. Practical/ professional/ problem-solving skills that are not yet secure
Inadequate use of learning resources. Failure to contribute to team work. Major problems with structure/ accuracy in expression. Very weak practical /professional skills. No ability to direct own learning
A mark of 0% may be awarded for non-submission, poor or dangerous practice, incoherent and insufficient work, and in situations where the student fails to address the assignment brief and related learning outcomes
8
7. Assessment Offences
You are reminded that any work that you submit must be your own. All suspected assessment offences will be investigated and can result in severe penalties. Please note that it is your responsibility to consult the relevant sections of the Academic Regulations (section 10) and the Student Handbook.
8. Learning Resources8.1 Recommended Texts
Course material (Key texts):
Español Lengua Viva 4, Cuaderno de ejercicios , Editorial Santillana.
Gramática y Recursos Comunicativos 4, Santillana
Books for sale in John Smiths Books, ARU
Dictionaries (available in the Library and / or Language Centre):Butterfield J 2004 Collins Spanish Dictionary 8th edition Glasgow: Collins Or Garman, B. 2001 The Oxford Spanish Dictionary 3rd edition Oxford: O.U.PUniversidad de Salamanca 1996 Diccionario Salamanca de la lengua española Salamanca: SantillanaCorripio, F. 1997Diccionario de Ideas Afines Barcelona: Herder
Reference Grammars (available in the Library and / or Language Centre):Butt, J. & Benjamin, C. A New Reference Grammar of Spanish 4th edition London ArnoldCoronado González, M.L. et al 1998 . Materia Prima. Gramática y Ejercicios Nivel Medio y Superior 2nd edition Madrid SGEL
8.2. Recommended Internet Resources Access to networked computers and multimedia language laboratories.Language Centre audio and audio-visual materials Spanish/Latin American Web-sites, e.g. Virtual Resource Centre:
Internet resources:http://cervantes.eshttp://www.colby.edu/~bknelson/exercises/index.htmlhttp://depts.washington.edu/spnrectr/irst.htmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/spanish/programmes/default.stmhttp://www.rtve.es/rne/index.htmhttp:/www.elpais.eshttp://www.elmundohttp://espanol.yahoo.eshttp://www.mundolatino.org/
Audio and audio-visual materials related to the course book as available in the Language Centre and University Library.
9
8.3. Other Resources
The computer rooms in the Helmore Building (330, 352, 254 ) and the Language Centre (HEL 245) all provide access to internet resources.
10
9. Module Definition Form
Module Definition Form (MDF)
1. Module Title: maximum 100 characters
Spanish Advanced 6
2a. Module Leader: 2b. Department: 2c. Faculty:
Dr Alicia Peña Calvo ECFM ALSS
3a. Level: see guidance notes 3b. Module Type: see guidance notes
2 Standard
4a. Credits: see guidance notes 4b. Study Hours: see guidance notes
15 150
5. Restrictions
Pre-requisites: Spanish Advanced 5 or equivalent and a period of at least 6 months residence abroad/language experience, or equivalent (European Framework B2 +1)
Co-requisites:
Exclusions:
Pathways to which this module is restricted:
LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
6a. Module Description: 200 – 300 words
This is the fourth in a series of advanced language modules in Spanish and it contributes to the attainment of the level C1 (Proficient User) of the Common European Framework. The module is compulsory for students following a Spanish pathway at this linguistic level but is open to all others who have the appropriate level of Spanish. It focuses on advanced productive and receptive use of Spanish using a variety of language materials and diverse activities and tasks. This challenging module aims to extend proficiency in Spanish making use of a wide and appropriate linguistic repertoire, while expanding the knowledge of contemporary issues in the Hispanic world. It also aims at further developing analytical, problem-solving and communication skills related to academic tasks which can also be applied to job situations. Two hours per week will be spent in class participating in Spanish in a variety of activities such as such as group debates and discussions, presentations, listening exercises sourced from authentic audio and audio-visual material, critical reading of a variety of literary and journalistic genres, using monolingual dictionaries, etc. Assessment methods consist on coursework, which may take the form of essays, research projects, in-class tests, reports or an oral presentation.
6b. Outline Content: A wide range and variety of expression both in written and oral Spanish appropriate to various topics and registers,
handling complex structures as well as communicating with advanced fluency and accuracy. Selection, evaluation and justification of information related to specific topics from various sources in Spanish to
construct a sophisticated academic text, being able to determine the reliability of information and to present and justify opinions and arguments.
Participation in constructive debates in Spanish, engaging with other participants views and reacting in an appropriate manner and register.
Module Code: AD215112S Version: 1 Date amended: 14.11.05
11
6c. Key Texts/Literature:Key text as indicated by module leader.Module Guide of relevant materials compiled by Module Leader and made available to students.Course book/grammar books as indicated by Module LeaderAdditional texts:Batchelor, R E & San José, M A (2003) Using Spanish Vocabulary Cambridge, C U PButt, J. & Benjamin, C. (2004) A New Reference Grammar of Spanish 4th edition London ArnoldDictionaries (available in the Library and / or Language Centre):Butterfield, J.(2004) Collins Spanish Dictionary 8th edition Glasgow CollinsOr Garman, B. (2001) The Oxford Spanish Dictionary 3rd edition Oxford O.U.P.Universidad de Salamanca (1996) Diccionario Salamanca de la Lengua Española Salamanca SantillanaCorripio, F. (1997) Diccionario de Ideas Afines Barcelona HerderReference Grammars (available in the Library and / or Language Centre):Coronado González, ML. et al. (1998) Materia Prima. Gramática y Ejercicios Nivel Medio y Superior 2nd edition Madrid SGEL
6d. Specialist Learning Resources:Access to networked computers and multimedia language laboratories.Language Centre audio and audio-visual materials Spanish/Latin American Web-sites, e.g. Virtual Resource Centre:Internet resources:http://www.cervantes.eshttp://www.colby.edu/~bknelson/exercises/index.htmlhttp://depts.washington.edu/spnrectr/irst.htmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/spanish/programmes/default.stmhttp://www.rtve.es/rne/index.htmhttp:/www.elpais.eshttp://www.elmundohttp://espanol.yahoo.eshttp://www.mundolatino.org/Audio and audio-visual materials related to the course book as available in the Language Centre (HEL 245/6); Language Laboratories ( HEL 330, HEL 352 HEL 354), and Library
7. Learning Outcomes (threshold standards):
On successful completion of this module the student will be expected to be able to:
Knowledge and understanding
5. Perform proficiently in spoken and written Spanish, demonstrated through critical evaluation of aspects of the contemporary cultures and societies of the Hispanic world.
6. Apply language skills effectively and appropriately in a broad variety of contexts including job-related and academic ones.
Intellectual, practical, affective and transferable skills
7. Write different types of texts (e.g. summaries, reviews, reports, academic essays etc), following appropriate structures and conventions, selecting and making critical use of written and spoken sources.
8. Use a variety of sources to determine the reliability of information and to present and justify opinions and arguments.
8. Learning Activities
Learning Activities HoursLearning
OutcomesDetails of duration, frequency
and other commentsLectures: 0 1-4 2 hrs per week over one semester.
12
Active participation in class, group-work activities, discussions, debates and simulations.
Other teacher managed learning:
24
Student managed learning: 126 1-4 Students need to do at least 10 hours of self study per week
TOTAL 150
9. Module Assessment
MethodLearning
Outcomes
% Weighting & Fine Grade (FG) or pass/fail (PF)
Qualifying Mark see guidance notes
Length/duration and other comments
Coursework 1-4 FG 100% 30% 3,000 words equivalent may include more than task e.g. oral/aural/written
In order to pass this module, students are required to achieve an overall mark of 40%.In addition, students are required to:(a) achieve the qualifying mark for each element of fine graded assessment as specified above(b) pass any pass/fail elements
OTHER TECHNICAL DETAILS
10. Delivery of the Module Please delete as appropriate
Delivery This module is delivered over… Yes or No? Indicate which by deleting as appropriate
1 …a single semester Y Semester 2
11. Subject: see guidance notes
13
MODULE REPORT FORM
This form should be completed by module tutors (where there is more than one delivery) and forwarded to Module Leaders who compiles the results on to one form for use at the Programme Committee and other methods of disseminating feedback to students.
Module Code and Title: AE 1/2/3 15031S Spanish Advanced 6
Anglia Ruskin Department: Languages and Intercultural Communication
Location(s) of Delivery: Cambridge
Academic Year: 2007/08 Semester/Trimester: 2
Enrolment Numbers (at each location): 19
Module Leader: Dr Alicia Peña Calvo
Other Module Tutors: Student Achievement Provide a brief overview of student achievement on the module as evidenced by the range of marks awarded. A detailed breakdown of marks will be available at the Departmental Assessment Panel.
The average mark is 63.8. 3 students got an A; 8 students got a B; 5 student got a C; and 3 students a D.
Feedback from Students Briefly summarise student responses, including any written comments
Complementary comments towards the teaching, the structure of the course and the topics. Students also praised the rapport established in class.Students particularly enjoyed the topics and the discussions in class. These helped them develop their language skills further and their knowledge of the Hispanic cultures.
Module Leader/Tutor’s Reflection on Delivery of the Module, including Response to Feedback from Students (including resources if appropriate)
This is the last time degree students take this module and it has been very satisfying to see ex-beginners’ high development of language.
Developments during the current year or planned for next year (if appropriate)
Revise materials for new structure
External Examiner’s Comments State whether the external examiner agreed the marks and/or commented on the module
Work of high quality and fairly marked. Constructive feedback.
14