Top Banner
Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012
12

Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Jasper Clark
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Soy Transportation CoalitionNational Waterways Conference

March 28, 2012

Page 2: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Why Should Farmers Care About Transportation? …Because our international competitiveness depends on it.

Costs of transporting soybeans: U.S. vs. Brazil (per metric ton; 4th quarter, 2011)

Davenport, Iowa to Shanghai North Mato Grosso to Shanghai

Truck - $10.22 Truck - $115.05

Barge - $28.91 ---------

Ocean - $55.33 Ocean – $49.65

Total Trans - $94.46 Total Trans - $164.70

Farm Value - $425.00 Farm Value - $358.24

Landed Cost - $519.46 Landed Cost - $522.94

Trans. as % of Land. Cost – 18.18% Trans. as % of Land. Cost – 31.50%

Source: USDA

Page 3: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Why Should Farmers Care About Waterways? …Because farmer profitability is impacted by it.

Page 4: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

The Soy Transportation Coalition – Farmer funded & farmer led Established in 2007. Comprised of 11 state soybean councils, the

United Soybean Board, American Soybean Association. National Grain & Feed Association & National Oilseed Processors: ex-officio members.

Page 5: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Panama Canal Expansion – Opportunity for increased efficiency, or are we shifting the bottleneck?

Pre Panama Canal Expansion (70 miles)

Post Panama Canal Expansion (111 miles)

Post Panama Canal Expansion (161 miles)

Page 6: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?Volume of Commodity Flows (2010) Illinois River

Grain: 24 million tons (20%) Coal: 13 million tons (11%) Petroleum: 19 million tons (16%)

Mississippi River Grain: 236 million tons (48%) Coal: 51 million tons (10%) Petroleum: 19 million tons (4%)

Ohio River Grain: 49 million tons (5%) Coal: 614 million tons (59%) Petroleum: 58 million tons (6%)

Page 7: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?

Cost to Agricultural Producers of Lock Closures

($ millions):Lock 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 1

Year

LaGrange $2.7 $4.8 $21.2 $30.4

Lock 20 $2.8 $4.9 $15.4 $44

Lock 25 $2.8 $4.9 $15.4 $44.1

Markland $0.89 $1.02 $3.8 $4.9

Lock 52 $2.9 $3.1 $11.9 $13.9

Page 8: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?

Most affected districts by lock failure (both production & consumption)

LaGrange Illinois District #20

Reduction in corn prices: 7 cents per ton Reduction in soybean prices: $2.45 per ton Total cost to agriculture: $4.3 million

Page 9: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

America’s Locks & Dams: A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?

Lost Revenue to Barge Companies from Lock Closures ($ millions):

Lock 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 1 Year

LaGrange $3.6 $5.6 $4.3$104

Lock 20 $5.1 $15 $33.3 $150

Lock 25 $5.1 $14.2 $32.4 $162

Markland $2.2 $4.7 $7.3 $11

Lock 52 $17.2 $26.1 $68 $71.5

Page 10: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Is it time to ask some tough questions?

Argument #1: How we allocate money is just as important as how much money we allocate. Comparison: U.S. lock & dam projects vs. foreign

examples Describe alternative funding mechanisms that

provide: 1.) Money up front & 2.) Greater certainty Explore potential for foreign investment

Page 11: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Is it time to ask some tough questions?

Argument #2: A predictably good inland waterway system is better than a hypothetically great one. Should we transition from a “build & expand”

approach to a “preserve & maintain” approach? Viability? What would that look like? Cost savings?

Page 12: Soy Transportation Coalition National Waterways Conference March 28, 2012.

Thank YouSoy Transportation Coalition

1255 SW Prairie Trail Parkway

Ankeny, Iowa 50023

515-727-0665

515-251-8657 (fax)

www.soytransportation.org

Mike Steenhoek, Executive Director

[email protected]