South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015
Dec 26, 2015
South/West Corridor Improvements
Service and Facility Alternatives
September 9, 2014
Planning & Project Development CommitteeMarch 3, 2015
2
AGENDA
2
I. Project Background
II. Preferred Alternative
III. Passenger Facilities Concepts
V. Next Steps
3
South/West Corridor Transit NeedsRecommended in Long Range Plan
Work trips made by transit:– 2.39% in region– 8.0% by residents of corridor
Ridership levels are even throughout the day
Key needs identified:» Improve frequency, speed and
reliability» Provide high-quality, accessible
passenger facilities» Connectivity between South/West
corridor and major activity centers
3
4
South/West Corridor
4
Over 3,000 stops in study area
Three major routes serving over 14,000 trips daily
» 520 – Zarzamora
» 524 – General McMullen
» 550/551 – Military/I-410/WW White
Connects with existing Primo Route 100 on Fredericksburg Road
Trips:
» 46% of the trips stay within the corridor
» 23% go downtownCoSA Major Activity Centers
Tx A&M
Brooks
PortSA Lackland AFB
STxMC
Background: Key PointsSpring 2014 – Alternatives Analysis
Fall 2014 – Short-Range Implementation Plan» Implement Service: Late 2017/Early 2018
5
6
Project Objectives
Consider needs of corridor and identify near-term investment (FY 2018)
Phase 1 Implementation: define service & facility improvements
Evaluate concepts
Stakeholder coordination and input
Develop fiscally constrained plan
SW Corridor
6
II. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
7
8
PRIMO Element Spectrum
8
Service & Operating Plan: All-day, frequent service, greater spacing than local service; peak 10-15 min
Branding Elements: Brand name/logo, marketing
ITS: Traffic Signal Priority (TSP), Real-Time Information, Security Cameras
Vehicles: Visibly distinct buses, 40’-60’
Stations: Visibly distinct stations, enhanced accessibility
Running Way: At least 50% dedicated FTA Required for BRT
Fare Collection: Off-Board preferred
9
Key Premium Service Objectives
Service Frequency similar to Fred - Primo 100
15-20% faster travel times than local bus
Longer stop distances than local bus » Maintain ½ mile walk access
9
10
Best Performing: Separate Zarzamora & Military Lines
Limited-stop Primo (with local underlay)
Connects Brooks, Kel-Lac, and
Madla via Zarzamora to Fred
Primo 100 – Crossroads & STMTC
Service pattern easier to operate
reliably
30-miles, 35-40 Primo Stops
Overlays local routes 520 &
550/551
ZA
RZ
AM
OR
A
MILITARY DRIVE
10
11
Highest ridership gain &most cost-effective
Serves highest population and job totals, and high number of activity centers
Serves 4 major transit centers
Travel time reduced for key trips: Kel-Lac to Brooks reduced 28%
Long Term:
» Preserves General McMullen for CoSA/VIA LRP efforts
» Opportunities for transit/land use integration
Best Performing: Separate Zarzamora & Military Lines
Limited-stop Primo (with local underlay)
11Z
AR
ZA
MO
RA
MILITARY DRIVE
III. PASSENGER FACILITIES CONCEPTS
12
1313
Primo Shelter – Family of OptionsGoal: Provide cost effective options, flexibility with right-of way constraints, adapt to ridership & service levels while maintaining PRIMO Brand» Fredericksburg Road Primo
» Next Gen Shelters
Options for System-wide Use
1414
SWC Concept – Key Elements Primo Brand ElementsComfort & SafetyReal-Time InfoFlylonSeatingLighting
1515
PRIMO Branded: Next Gen Shelters
Modified NextGenLightingScreened BackInterchangeable PanelsFlylonStatic Info Signage
1616
Benefits
Implements the Long Range Plan
Improved frequency, speed and reliability for customers: Increased Ridership
High-quality, accessible passenger facilities:» Enhanced security & safety» Enhanced walkability
Improve connectivity: within corridor & between major activity centers
Capitalizes and enhances the Fred Primo 100
17
Conduct public
outreachRefine Service
Plan
Refine Capital & Passenger Amenities
Finalize implementation
plan
Next Steps
18
Questions