Top Banner
1-1 © 2005 UMFK. Sotheb internet business models text and cases Kristin Belanger
24

Sothebys

Jan 13, 2016

Download

Documents

upton

Sothebys.com. internet. business models. text and cases. Kristin Belanger. High End Fine Arts Auction Business. Overview. Introduction History Strategies Stakeholders Get Big Fast! 20-20 Hindsight. History. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sothebys

1-1

© 2005 UMFK.

Sothebys.com

internet business models

text and cases

Kristin Belanger

Page 2: Sothebys

1-2

© 2005 UMFK.

High End Fine Arts Auction Business

Page 3: Sothebys

1-3

© 2005 UMFK.

Overview

• Introduction

• History

• Strategies

• Stakeholders

• Get Big Fast!

• 20-20 Hindsight

Page 4: Sothebys

1-4

© 2005 UMFK.

History

• Samuel Baker – English book dealer– Advertised his sales with catalogues

• Over the years added:– Prints, jewelry, china, furniture, paintings

• Competitor: Christie’s – Also specialized in fine arts

• Became known for famous auction house in the world

Page 5: Sothebys

1-5

© 2005 UMFK.

History

• 1985 sold Van Gogh’s “Landscape with Rising Sun” for $9.9 million

• Sold celebrity items as well• New York based

– Had major presence in London and had offices in 98 other cities

• Operated under Sotheby’s Holdings– Divisions include:

• Sotheby’s Financial Services, Sotheby’s Trusts and Estates Services, Sotheby’s International Reality Group, Sotheby’s Appraisal Services, Sotheby’s Insurance Brokerage Services, and Sotheby’s Restoration Services

Page 6: Sothebys

1-6

© 2005 UMFK.

Auction Process

• Sellers contact Sotheby’s specialists– Agents would consign property– Sellers contact most relevant specialist to item

for sale– Specialists deem property owners value

• Specialists evaluate authenticity

• Then it was shipped to the New York location

Page 7: Sothebys

1-7

© 2005 UMFK.

Auction Process Cont.

• Labeled entered into database and stored in Sotheby’s storage

• Catalogued, description is written, history, photograph

• Photographs are usually $900 per quarter pg. in color

• Then stored and await exhibition and sale

Page 8: Sothebys

1-8

© 2005 UMFK.

Auction Process Cont.

• Catalogues sent to known prospective customers• Catalogues sold by subscription• Agents phoned individuals what items were going

to be for sale• Potential buyers could leave bids with Sotheby’s

Left Bid Dept. • Live auction: if highest bid is lower than the

highest bid – Sotheby’s employee would bid on behalf of the absent customer

Page 9: Sothebys

1-9

© 2005 UMFK.

Auction

• Days before auction – items would be put into a window for display

• Displayed pieces on stage as auctioned off• Bidders had their credit approved before auction

(many long time clients)• Then bids began

– Once slowed – Fair Warning, then final bid

• Consigners could place a reserve price– If not sold above price – “bought in” (usually 30%)

Page 10: Sothebys

1-10

© 2005 UMFK.

Auction

• Once purchased, buyer settled account, walked out or had Sotheby’s Purchasing Accounts Dept write an invoice

• Sotheby’s Art Transport Dept arrange shipping at the buyers risk and cost

• Estimated that majority of items sold broke even or lost money

Page 11: Sothebys

1-11

© 2005 UMFK.

Revenue

• 20% of buyers premium up to and including $15,000

• 15% of the next $85,000

• 10% anything above $100,000

• Easier to sell lots then get lots to sell

Page 12: Sothebys

1-12

© 2005 UMFK.

“You have to be the best place to buy to attract buyers. And you have to be the best place to sell to attract sellers.”

Page 13: Sothebys

1-13

© 2005 UMFK.

Online Auctions

• Anticipate $19 billion in gross

• eBay “help people trade practically anything on earth”– $10.8 million in profit

• Christie’s– Put everything online, but did not have online

bidding– Streamed video allowed bidders to participate

Page 14: Sothebys

1-14

© 2005 UMFK.

Sothebys.com

• 80% of lots sold for < $5,000• Potential market of buyers was enormous• 8 million millionaires most never attended

Sotheby’s• Offered two auctions through three vehicles

– Amazon.Sothebys.com for general arts between $100 and $1,000

– Sothebys.com for $1,000 and $10,000 fine arts

– Traditional live auctions

Page 15: Sothebys

1-15

© 2005 UMFK.

Sothebys.com

• Volume of lower-priced lots increased

• Dealers were permitted to sell on Sotheby’s

• Expected 500 – 600 dealers to sign before sites launched– At launch 3,000 had signed

• Dealers did the same info as Sotheby’s did as special agents

Page 16: Sothebys

1-16

© 2005 UMFK.

Sothebys.Amazon.com

• Partnered with Amazon for 15 mill. Qualified buyers

• Split all profits and expenses from auction site

• Amazon maintained site, dealer questions were forwarded to Sothebys.com internal customer service dept.

Page 17: Sothebys

1-17

© 2005 UMFK.

The Sotheby’s Site

• Customers could click and begin bidding– Pre approved credit card– > $20,000 had a credit check

• Max. bidders could lose even if they had highest bid

• Implemented automated system• Auction length 2 weeks• Buyers out bided would receive an e-mail

Page 18: Sothebys

1-18

© 2005 UMFK.

Physical Lots

• Each set of inventory stored separately

• Catalogued and sorted either to Sothebys.com or Sothebys.Amazon.com

• Each item photographed for catalogues

• Lists arrived each day with sold items

• Items were sent to the shipping part of Sotheby’s

Page 19: Sothebys

1-19

© 2005 UMFK.

Dealer Lots

• Once info is compiled from Physical lots – checked by specialists and immediately available online

• Once sold – Associate prepared for shipping, finalizing charges

• Associate packed and shipped item and notified Sotheby’s of arrangement

Page 20: Sothebys

1-20

© 2005 UMFK.

Customer Service

• Tier 1• Call center

– Helped answer questions about auctions

• Tier 2• Funneled calls

– Billing and lots – NY and London

• More than half questions were about website• Had problems w/ customer service

– Agents availability– Placing bids online

Page 21: Sothebys

1-21

© 2005 UMFK.

Stakeholders

• Buyers

• Sellers

• Employees

Page 22: Sothebys

1-22

© 2005 UMFK.

GBF?!

• Network Effects– Moderate to Strong

• “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure”

• Scales of Economies– Strong

• Didn’t segregate any type of art or artifacts• Or Countries/Languages

• Customer Retention– High – people were signed up for catalogues

• Always something of interest up for auction

Page 23: Sothebys

1-23

© 2005 UMFK.

Success or Failure?

• Success! With auctions every two weeks there are always on-going auctions

• Expanded to different countries– Including languages

• Now offer more than just art and artifacts– Includes Diamonds, Gold, International Realty,

Financial Services

Page 24: Sothebys

1-24

© 2005 UMFK.

Questions??