Top Banner
1 Who’s in the know” - using Social Network Analysis to support adaptive communities
41
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Social network analysis

1

“Who’s in the know” - using Social Network Analysis to support adaptive

communities

Page 2: Social network analysis

NSW Adaptation Approach

2

Regional Vulnerability

and Assessments

Stakeholder Engagement & Capacity

Building

NSW Relevant climate

Information

Page 3: Social network analysis

www.ClimateChange.environment.nsw.gov.au

Page 4: Social network analysis

Regional Engagement

People engaged – 600+

Pop. represented – 73%

LGA’s covered – 61%

Page 5: Social network analysis

Building Adaptive Capacity

Providing tools and resources to minimise impacts of climate change in local communities

Including grants…..

Page 6: Social network analysis

Building Resilience to Climate Change grants· Grants of between $15,000 - $80,000 are available to respond to

a previously identified climate change risk or vulnerability, via:- climate change risk assessment, meeting Australian standards; or

- a climate change vulnerability assessment (peer reviewed methodology)

· Round 2 focus on proposals that- Address water supply or security

- Adapt priority infrastructure

· Collaboration with councils, regional organisations, researchers, private sector is encouraged.

· www.lgnsw.org.au/policy/climate-change/building-resilience

Page 7: Social network analysis

Adaptation Research Hub

$2.75 million leverage fund generating $6 million in collaborative research over 3 years in key research areas:

· Biodiversity – Climate Futures at Macquarie and CSIRO

· Adaptive Communities – Institute for Sustainable Futures and CSIRO

· Coastal processes and responses – Sydney Institute for Marine Science and ACCARNSI

Page 8: Social network analysis

8

Page 9: Social network analysis

9 |

Social networks

A social network is a social structure made up of a set of actors (such as individuals or organizations) and a set ties between these actors

9 |

Page 10: Social network analysis

Benefits of Social Networks

· More flexible than top-down communication strategies.

· Information is likely to be trusted and accepted.

· Information can spread quickly (e.g. social media).

· But, very limited evidence or proof of their application.

Page 11: Social network analysis

Social Network Analysis

· People/Entities are represented as nodes.

Page 12: Social network analysis

• People / Entities are represented as nodes.• Connections are represented as edges/lines.

Connections may be kin, work, acquaintanceship, friendship, co-authorship, knowledge etc.

SNA Allows for analysis using mathematical graph theory

12

Page 13: Social network analysis

Social network analysis

Page 14: Social network analysis

Data Sources

Archival Data

Ethnographic / Interview Data

Historical Data (e.g., meeting minutes)

Survey Data

Social Media (e.g. Twitter feeds)

SNA Software (examples, many options)

UCINet

KeyPlayer

Page 15: Social network analysis

15 |

Page 16: Social network analysis

Describing the structure of social networks

Centrality - Density - Betweeness

Centrality: How many ties a specific node has.

A high degree of centrality occurs when an individual has considerably more ties with other actors than other individuals within the networks.

These ‘highly connected’ individuals are important for the diffusion of information throughout the network.

16 |

Page 17: Social network analysis

Density (a measure of cohesion):

the number of links divided by the number of nodes in the network.

density of a networks typically grows over time, as individual actors increase their interactions

networks exhibiting a high density may contribute to the strengthening of trust between individuals and/or groups and thereby also increase the possibility for social control

high density may also benefit the spread of information throughout a network by increasing the accessibility of information

Page 18: Social network analysis

Betweeness:· the extent to which each node contributes to minimizing the

distance between nodes within the network.

· That is, this measure can be used to identify the actors that contribute most to linking the network.

· These actors are critical to ensure shared learnings and cooperative action.

18 |

Page 19: Social network analysis

Adaptive Communities Node Case study

Aim

To look at the process by which science, policy and communities interact by developing an understanding of how formal networks of stakeholders interact with informal networks to convey information at the local scale.

Goal

To understand how decision-makers can better engage with communities to improve to acceptance and uptake of climate adaptation policies/programs/strategies?

Page 20: Social network analysis

Shoalhaven Council

· Encompasses 4,531km2 including national parks, state forest, bushland, beaches and lakes.

· Population: 97, 694 people with a density of 0.22 people per 0.01km2 (ABS, 2013).

· Main sectors of employment are manufacturing, government (including Defence), retail and tourism.

· Rural land primarily dairy farming, nurseries, and a growing number of more intensive agricultural activities.

· Strong cultural history with links to indigenous communities, the Wodi Wodi and Wandandian Aboriginal people.

20 |

Page 21: Social network analysis

Methods

· Qualitative Social Network Analysis (semi-structured interviews)

Where do you get your climate information?

Who do you share climate information with?

• Participants identified through purposive snowballing

• 24 participants were surveyed:

12 from government agencies (formal networks)

12 from key climate community groups/members (informal networks)

21 |

Page 22: Social network analysis

Results: Where do you get your climate information

· 24 participants identified 165 ‘entities’

45 government entities (local, state and/or federal)

25 community based organisations

23 mass media entities (e.g.- tv, radio, newspaper)

16 ‘other’ (e.g.- mother, father, neighbour, etc.)

14 Non-government organisations

12 mass communication channels (e.g.- internet, mobile)

12 international entities

6 research organisations

5 social media outlets

22 |

Page 23: Social network analysis

Results: Where do you get your climate information

23 |

Page 24: Social network analysis

· Each node had ties to 2.5 alternative nodes (average)

· Three key players:

Bureau of Meteorology (#6)

ABC Radio (#14)

Sydney Morning Herald (#76)

• 84.2% coverage (n=139 distinct persons

Page 25: Social network analysis

Results: How do you share climate information

· 24 participants identified 194 ‘entities’

79 Community based organisations

47 Government (local, state or federal)

32 Other (father, mother, neighbour, etc.)

15 Non-government organisations

7 mass communication (internet, mobile)

6 mass media (tv, radio, newspaper)

5 social media

3 research organisations

Page 26: Social network analysis

Results: How do you share climate information

Page 27: Social network analysis

· Knowledge disseminated in dense clusters

· Knowledge primarily shared with local profession and geographical group

· Network far more fractious

· Three key players:

Local radio and 2 community members

Page 28: Social network analysis

Key findings

· Community members access climate information from a wide variety of sources, however….

· They don’t really share what they learn

· Only a few key players; Limited functional redundancy??

· SNA works!!!

Page 29: Social network analysis

Implications· SNA can be used to identify key

nodes/individuals to disseminate climate information

· Provides OEH with critical information about how to engage communities in climate adaptation;

Trusted source of information

Broad coverage and quick (links with emergency services)

• Potentially identifies cost effective means of community engagement

Page 30: Social network analysis

In seeking to increase acceptance and uptake of climate change and adaptation strategies/policies/etc;

• Build climate resilient and adaptive communities.

• Increase public safety (i.e. fires, storms, etc.)

• Social connectness /cohesion

• Economic benefits (i.e. industries sustained and/or enhanced)

Benefits extend beyond climate to any area where community engagement is important!!

Page 31: Social network analysis

What next?

· Upscale: how does this translate to other areas/communities?

Bega complete, 31 interviews, SNA currently underway

Another area (inland)

Also SNA-ing the NSW Adaptation Hub

· Qualitative understanding: what drives patterns?

· Finding efficiencies: what role for modern technologies (social media, micro-sites, etc.)

· State (or even national) plan of engagement???

· Working with OEH to trial and monitor new community engagement strategies.

Page 32: Social network analysis

Two reports on:www.uts.edu.au/research-and-teaching/our-research/institute-sustainable-futures/our-research/major-projects/nsw

An Introduction to Social Networks for Engaging the Community in Climate Policy.  

A preliminary assessment into the utility of social networks for engaging local communities in climate adaptation policy

32

Page 33: Social network analysis

Social Network Analysis – Who’s who in climate and water communication?

Participate in a SNA

Send an SMS with content

NSWOEH

to0427 541 357

Normal SMS charges apply. Your number is not stored or given to any 3rd parties

33

Page 40: Social network analysis

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

· Research Team

- Chris Cvitanovic

- Rebecca Clunn

- Thomas Measham

- Brent Jacobs

- Anne-Maree Dowd

- Ben Harman

· OEH, in particular Chris, Storm, Polly

· Natasha Kuruppu and Sam Sharpe

· Shoalhaven city council

· All of our participants

· Further reading: Hub Reports on your thumb drives

Page 41: Social network analysis

www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.auHeather.Stevens@[email protected]