social media cafe / organize your author identities

“Organize your author identities”

Social Media Cafe

6 October 2015, Hugo Besemer & Ellen Fest

Scholarly identities

http://viaf.org/viaf/2853922633/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-0000http://wu.academia.edu/MemyselfandIhttp://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-4161-2002http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/me-myselfandihttp://www.researchgate.net/profile/Me_Myselfandihttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=3iDBE-MAAAA0http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/34073815http://www.narcis.nl/person/info:eu-repo/dai/nl/33714253Y

Impressive, uh?

What we want to achieve

Inform your choice which profiles are important for you

Find the best workflow for you to populate your profiles

Content

“The big picture”

ORCID

Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google Scholar)

Local systems

Scholarly social media

Flows between profiles

Content


ORCID


Local systems



the online IDENTITY labyrinth

6

We@WUR

ID’s from Search enginesGoogle Scholar - Web of Science - Scopus

• Add personal profile • Find and claim your publications

+ Calculate your H-index easier

Local registryMetis → Pure

• Submit papers via your group’s contact person

+ Overview of Wageningen output+ Used for visitations, tenure track etc.

ID’s from Social networksResearchGate – Academia.edu – Mendeley - Scholarmate

• Add personal file • Import papers that you want to share

+ Interacting with peers

Local ProfileWE@WUR

• Create profile• Add ID’s

+ Wageningen UR yellow pages

+ Online visibility

Integrating ID’sORCID


+ It is becoming general + Identification for funders,

publishers

We@WUR

StaffPubs










Local ProfileWE@WUR



+ Online visibility




publishers

StaffPubs







Local ProfileWE@WUR



+ Online visibility




publishers




StaffPubs

Content


ORCID


Local systems



ORCID is becoming de-facto standard for the

identification of scientists

For publishers

and funders

ORCID background

Open Researcher and Contributor ID

Registry open since October 2012

Over 1.5 Million ID’s served (2015-08-03)

Not-for-profit with members (publishers, institutions)

Researchers have complete control which information (and which works) is shared:

= World - Trusted parties - Hidden

If you have authored books or reports you

may have an ISNI

ISNI => ORCID

ISNI => ORCID

Background ISNI and ORCID

ISNI is for the creative industry (people associated with books, music, TV shows, whatever)

International Standard Name Identifier

ORCID is an ISNI (4x4 digits, ORCID has a reserved range) but:

ISNI and ORCID registries are maintained by different organisations, so:

one person can have both an ISNI and an ORCID

But one ISNI or ORCID can not have more than one person attached to it

Content


ORCID


Local systems



Why important?

calculate your own h-index

data collection for bibliometric analysis (e.g. job application)

populating ORCID

show on your webpage

Scopus Author Identifier

grouped via an algorithm by Scopus

1 author can have more Identifiers

to check: perform an Author Search

merge Identifiers

merge!

Scopus Author Identifier

grouped via an algorithm

1 author can have more Identifiers

to check: perform an Author Search

merge Identifiers

connect Scopus Author details and publications to ORCID → orcid.scopusfeedback.com

http://orcid.scopusfeedback.com/

Web of Science (WoS)

ResearcherID → group your publications in WoS

register at www.researcherid.com

● perform author search to identify your publications

http://www.researcherid.com/

A record set is a set of publications automatically grouped by Web of Science based

on author, subject and affiliation.




● author search to identify your publications

● import function in ResearcherID (WoS, Endnote, RIS)







● exchange with ORCID







● add your ORCID

you have to update your ResearcherID regularly!


Google Scholar

largest set of publications → books, book chapters, reports

undefined what is in and what not

Google Scholar



verification email-address → at your institution

search publications (author search) or add manually

Google Scholar



verification email-address → at your institution

search publications (author search) or add manually

add publications and check!

make your profile public available

Content


ORCID


Local systems


Staff Publications - Metis

registry of all Wageningen UR output

tenure track & visitations rely on Metis-data

all your publications linked to your wur-profile

one author ID in Staff Publications

go to my library (login) and check your publication list

Staff Publications






perform an advanced author search

Staff Publications






perform an advanced author search

request to merge your publications under one "MetisNr"

send email to [email protected]

update WE@WUR

yellow pages of Wageningen UR

important for your visibility on the web

add your author IDs, publications lists, social networks to your WE@WUR profile

Key publications

• link to article

• manually entry

• add picture

Publication lists

• Academia.edu

• Google Scholar Citations

• Narcis

• ResearchGate

• ORCID

• Scholarmate.com

• Scopus

• WageningenUR

• Web of Science

• Other list

Researcher ID's

• ORCID

• METIS-ID

• ISNI

• DAI

• Scopus Author ID

• WoS - ResearcherID


Social media

• Facebook • Pinterest

• Flickr • ResearchGate

• Foursquare • Skype


• Twitter

• Google+ • YouTube

• Linkedin • other networks

update We@WUR

add your author IDs, publications lists, social networks to your we@wur profile

identify Key Publications

make your profile public

improve your online visibility

http://www.wageningenur.nl/en/Persons/Jan-Willem-Van-Groenigen-1.htm

Content


ORCID


Local systems



Things you can do on most networks• Create a profile• Follow people and subject

groups• Request papers from an

authors• Upload papers to share

them

Murray, Meg. "ANALYSIS OF A SCHOLARLY SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE: THE CASE OF THE DORMANT USER." SAIS 2014 Proceedings (2014).http://saisconferencemgmt.org/proceedings/2014/Murray.pdf

What they offer

Companies Registered users(latest)

Wageningen users(24-8-2015, my estimate)

What’s special

ResearchGate 6 m 559Good coverage in Scholar

Academia.edu They say 24.191.648 231 Good coverage in Google

Scholarmate 2 m 17Recommender servicesChinese community

Mendeley 2.5 m 557 Reference manager

Users are lazy with their profiles

But they upload their papers

More research into usage

Little overlap [1]

Weak correlation with citedness [1]

Moderate relationship with traditional metrics and ResearchGate metrics[2]

Correlation between Mendeley libraries and citedness [3]

India, Brazil taking advantage of ResearchGate, China and Russia lagging

behind [2]

Social scientists (at an Indian university) found it more useful than scientists

[4]

Highly cited European authors do not have profiles [5]

Content


ORCID


Local systems



Summary

ID’s from Search enginesGoogle Scholar - Web of Science

- Scopus

ris-export


ID’s from Social networksMendeley - ResearchGate

Academia.edu – Scholarmate

Local ProfileWE@WUR


dir

ect

dir

ect

StaffPubs

dir

ect

Bib

TeX

Bib

TeX

add

lin

k

Go to:

www.wageningenur.nl/en/Expertise-Services/Facilities/Library/Expertise/Write-cite/Profiles.htm

to find more information and guides

http://www.wageningenur.nl/en/Expertise-Services/Facilities/Library/Expertise/Write-cite/Profiles.htm

Thanks to Ria,

Marianne, Luzma and

Jan-Willem for using

their profiles

http://www.slideshare.net/hugobesemer

http://www.slideshare.net/EllenFest

65

References

1] Ortega, J. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic

social sites : The case of CSIC ’ s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39–49.

doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004

[2] Thelwall, M. Kousha, K (2013) ResearchGate : Disseminating , Communicating and Measuring

Scholarship. Journal of the American Society for information Science

[3] Li, Xuemei, and Mike Thelwall. "F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators." Proceedings

of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators. Vol. 2. 2012.

[4] Chakraborty, N. (2012). Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars

in NEHU: A study on Facebook and ResearchGate. Planner-2012, 19-27.

[5] Mas Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. & Aguillo, I. (2013). European highly cited scientists’

presence in the social web. In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger and H. Moed

(Eds.), 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (ISSI 2013), (pp. 98-

109). Vienna: Austria.

social media cafe / organize your author identities

Education