Top Banner
Goldberg Chapter 4 Drugs & the Law
43
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Goldberg Chapter 4 Drugs & the Law

Page 2: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Cat

B. Dog

C. Both

D. Neither

CatDog

Both

Neither

12% 12%8%

69%

Page 3: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Attempts have been made to regulate the use of mind-altering substances since settlers first arrived in the New World

The first substance regulated was alcohol

The temperance movement in the late 1700s advocated that people become more educated about the hazards of alcohol

Click picture for video

Page 4: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Alcohol 1791: Congress passed an excise tax

on whiskey

Opium 1833: US treaty regulated international opium trade 1842: Tax on crude opium shipped to the US 1875: San Francisco prohibiting smoking in opium dens 1890: Only US citizens could manufacture or import opium

Proprietary drugs (over-the-counter drugs) Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906

Page 5: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Do drug laws affect whether people use drugs?

Should drug laws be aimed at drug users, sellers, or traffickers?

Should the role of government be to inform its citizens about drugs or to prevent its citizens from using drugs?

Should a person be prevented from engaging in self-destructive behavior?

Page 6: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. A problem best handled by the legal system

B. A problem best handled as a public health issue

A pro

blem

best

handle

d...

A pro

blem

best

handle

d...

70%

30%

Page 7: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Go to the future

B. Go to the past

C. Stay right here

Go to th

e futu

re

Go to th

e past

Stay ri

ght h

ere

20%

32%

48%

Page 8: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Before 1906, patent medicines were largely unregulated

US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was created to assess drug hazards and prohibit sale of dangerous drugs

Law required drug manufacturers to report adverse reactions to their products

Law required that the amount or proportion of drugs in the medicine had to be listed on the label

Page 9: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Stop people from using opium

B. Establish taxes on drugs

C. Force people to get prescriptions for drugs

D. Keep dangerous drugs off the market

Stop p

eople fr

om u

sing .

..

Establis

h taxe

s on d

rugs

Forc

e people

to get p

resc

...

Keep dangero

us dru

gs off.

..

4%

76%

20%

0%

Page 10: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

The Harrison Act resulted from the need to limit opiate use

Law governed the marketing and sale of narcotics, regulated nonmedical narcotic use, and made possession of narcotics without a prescription illegal

Doctors and pharmacists had to keep records of the prescriptions they wrote

To obtain drugs, an increasing number of people resorted to criminal activity

Page 11: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Established taxes on drugs

B. Made opium illegal without a prescription

C. Established jail time for drug offenses

Establis

hed taxe

s on d

rugs

Made o

pium

illegal w

ith...

Establis

hed jail

time fo

r ...

4% 0%

96%

Page 12: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Began with the Temperance Movement

19th Amendment passed in 1919

Speak-easies Bootlegging Increase in organized

crime Repealed in 1933 by

the 21st Amendment

Page 13: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Forbade the recreational use of marijuana, but not medicinal or industrial uses

Anyone using marijuana was required to pay a tax – failure to comply meant a large fine or prison term for tax evasion

AMA and others opposed marijuana legislation

The Federal Bureau of Narcotics, established in 1932, later became the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

Page 14: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. True

B. False

True

False

100%

0%

Page 15: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Under 1906 guidelines, a drug manufacturer could not be prosecuted for fatalities due to toxic drugs

1938 Act required pharmaceutical companies to file applications with the federal government demonstrating that all new drugs were safe and properly labeled

Manufacturers had to submit a “new drug application” to the FDA, giving the FDA more authority and responsibility

Page 16: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Did not cover drugs that were previously marketed

Drugs had to be proven safe, but not effective

Government had little authority to enact penalties

Manufacturers determined whether a drug would be sold as a prescription or over-the-counter

Manufacturers conducted their own tests to determine a drug’s effectiveness

Page 17: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Established taxes on new drugs

B. Ensured that drugs were proven effective

C. Ensured that new drugs were proven safe

D. Enacted stiff penalties for false advertising

Establis

hed taxe

s on n

ew...

Ensure

d that d

rugs w

ere...

Ensure

d that n

ew d

rugs .

..

Enacted st

iff p

enaltie

s for..

.

0% 0%

85%

15%

Page 18: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Serious birth defects caused by thalidomide resulted in implementation of stronger regulations regarding drug testing

Kefauver-Harris Amendments, 1962, gave the FDA the authority to withdraw drugs from the marketplace

Drug advertisements directed to physicians were required to include the drug’s side effects and its contraindicated uses

Testing procedures required prior approval from the FDA

Page 19: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

1972 Drug Efficacy Study: The FDA asked the National Research Council to conduct a study of new drugs

Active ingredients were placed in one of three categories: Category I drugs: Determined to be safe, effective, and

properly labeled

Category II drugs: Not generally recognized as safe and effective, or recognized as mislabeled; must be removed from medications within six months

Category III drugs: Data insufficient to determine general recognition of safety and effectiveness

Page 20: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. The FDA had the authority to remove unsafe drugs from the market

B. Taxes on drug advertisements were enacted

C. Advertisements must include side-effects

D. Tests were required prior to a drug’s approval

The FDA had th

e authorit

...

Taxes o

n dru

g adve

rtise

...

Advertise

ments

must

inc..

.

Tests w

ere re

quired p

rior .

.

4% 4%8%

85%

Page 21: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act (Controlled Substances Act), effectively replaced all previous laws dealing with narcotics and dangerous drugs

Expanded community health centers and Public Health Service hospitals for drug abusers

Established a commission on marijuana and drug abuse

Divided drugs into five categories called schedules

Page 22: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. True

B. False

True

False

19%

81%

Page 23: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Schedule Criteria Examples

I a. High potential for abuse

b. No accepted medical use

c. Lack of accepted safety

Heroin,

marijuana, MDMA

(Ecstasy)

II a. High potential for abuse

b. Currently accepted medical use

c. Abuse may lead to severe dependence

Morphine,

cocaine,

methamphetamine

III a. Potential for abuse less than I and II

b. Currently accepted medical use

c. Abuse may lead to moderate physical dependence or high

psychological dependence

Anabolic steroids,

most barbiturates,

Dronabinol (THC in pill

form)

IV a. Low potential for abuse relative to III

b. Currently accepted medical use

c. Abuse may lead to limited physical or psychological

dependence relative to III

Xanax, barbital,

chloral hydrate,

fenfluramine

V a. Low potential for abuse relative to IV

b. Currently accepted medical use

c. Abuse may lead to limited physical or psychological

dependence relative to IV

Mixture with small

amounts of codeine or

opium

Page 24: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4
Page 25: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Legislation that emphasizes stringent punishment of the drug user, to reduce drug demand

Punishment could be waived if the user completes a drug rehabilitation program

Greatly increased federal prison population and led to a new Cabinet position, Director of National Drug Control Policy

Under this law, drug users are punished more stringently than rapists or robbers

Page 26: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Emphasized strict punishment for drug infractions

B. Allowed offenders to complete treatment rather than jail

C. Created lighter sentences for drug offenses

D. A & B

E. All of the above Emphasiz

ed stric

t punis.

..

Allow

ed offe

nders to

co...

Create

d ligh

ter s

entence

s...

A & B

All of t

he above

8%4%

0%

88%

0%

Page 27: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Absolutely.

B. No, I disagree, it was a bad idea.

C. I’m not sure or have no opinion.

Absolu

tely

.

No, I d

isagr

ee, it w

as a b

..

I’m n

ot sure

or h

ave no ..

.

54%

27%19%

Page 28: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

1. Should the sale of drug paraphernalia be illegal?

2. Should people using small amounts of illegal drugs for personal enjoyment receive harsh criminal penalties?

3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of decriminalizing or legalizing drugs?

4. What impact has drug enforcement had on drug use?

5. Should the vast amount of money spent on stopping drugs be used differently?

Page 29: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Yep, already looked at it.

B. Yeah…heard you say that, but where is it?

C. No, didn’t know that.

D. There’s an exam tomorrow???

Yep, alre

ady looked a

t it.

Yeah…heard yo

u say th

at...

No, did

n’t know

that.

There’s

an exa

m to

morr

...

35%

8%

19%

38%

Page 30: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Drug paraphernalia:

Items that are aids to using drugs (cigarette-rolling papers, water pipes, razors, clay pipes, roach clips, spoons, mirrors, and other products)

Prosecuting individuals for possessing drug paraphernalia is viewed as a deterrent for drug use

Page 31: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. Yes

B. No

C. Maybe in some cases

YesNo

Mayb

e in so

me ca

ses

21%

43%

36%

Page 32: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

In 1988, Congress proclaimed that the US would be drug-free by 1995

The monetary expense and human resources employed to combat illicit drug use are enormous – yet, the number of Americans who have used illegal drugs has increased

The government’s assault on illicit drugs has resulted in social tension, ill health, violent crime, compromised civil liberties, and international conflict

Page 33: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. True

B. False

True

False

96%

4%

http://ezproxy.wwcc.edu:2048/login?url=http://digital.films.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?aid=7539&xtid=50127

Page 34: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

A. For legalization

B. Against legalization

C. For legalization, but only for some drugs

For l

egalizatio

n

Again

st le

galizatio

n

For l

egalizatio

n, but o

nly...

11%

39%

50%

Page 35: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Some argue that decriminalization would increase drug use, addiction, and drug-related deaths

Drug-related crimes might fall, but the number of addicts would rise

Legalization would result in more dysfunctional addicts who would be unable to support their lifestyles and drug use through legitimate means

Page 36: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Legal regulation of drugs would protect drug takers and save money

Billions of dollars spent on drug enforcement might be put to use more effectively if the money were directed toward education and treatment programs

Page 37: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4
Page 38: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Drug enforcement is designed to stem the flow of drugs coming into the US and to punish the user

To stop drugs at their source, the State Department works with a number of foreign governments

DEA agents help block drugs from leaving other countries, eradicate crops, and find and dismantle illegal laboratories

Page 39: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Farmers make more money from coca or opium crops than from legal crops

On a global scale, less than 10% of illegal crops are consistently eradicated

Interdiction is especially difficult because of numerous points of entry

Page 40: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Harm reduction Interventions that respond to

needs of drug users and the community to reduce harm caused by illicit drug use

Includes providing sterile syringes to reduce spread of HIV infection, education, and increased treatment

Treats drug abuse as a public health problem, not a criminal problem

Page 41: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Normalization Term used by the Dutch for the

practice of not prosecuting users of soft drugs such as marijuana

Using some drugs is not illegal, but drug traffic is illegal

Treatment assists physical and social well-being of addicts rather than try to stop their addiction

Result: Netherlands has less drug use than the US and other European countries

Page 42: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Questionable search warrants in inner-city communities

People of color are stopped and searched more often than others on the basis of “drug courier” profiles

Despite comparable drug usage, Blacks are incarcerated at a higher rate than Whites

Penalties for crack cocaine, used more by poor, are greater than those for powder cocaine, used more by middle class

Page 43: SOC 204 Goldberg Ch 4

Starting in 1984, Congress enacted mandatory minimum penalties specifically focusing on drugs and violent crimes

It has been shown that mandatory minimum drug sentences have not acted as deterrents to further crime

Mandatory minimum drug sentences give no latitude to judges to determine appropriate punishments

Treatment is 15 times more effective for reducing serious crime than mandatory minimum sentencing