Page 1
©SHRM 2010 1©SHRM 2010
16th February 2011
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM)
All materials are Copyrighted 2010 by Strategic Human Resources Management India, Pvt. Ltd. or Society for Human Resource
Management unless otherwise expressly noted. All rights expressly reserved.
Page 2
©SHRM 2010 2
Structure
1. Designing a competitive rewards strategy – Key elements
» Zubin Mulla
2. Reward challenges and implications
» Suman Shankar
3. Question and Answer Session
Page 3
©SHRM 2010 3
Elements of a reward strategy
• Pay level
• Pay structure
• Pay mix: cash-benefits vs. variable
• Equity-based pay
Page 4
©SHRM 2010 4
Raff, M. G., & Summers, L. H. (1987). Did Henry Ford pay efficiency wages?
Journal of Labor Economics, 5(4): S57-S86.
1913 1914 1915
Average workforce 13,623
Total leaving 50,448
Turnover rate 370 % ? ?
Absenteeism 10 % ? ?Henry
Ford
$5/day
introduced
Page 5
©SHRM 2010 5
Raff, M. G., & Summers, L. H. (1987). Did Henry Ford pay efficiency wages?
Journal of Labor Economics, 5(4): S57-S86.
1913 1914 1915
Average workforce 13,623 12,115 18,028
Total leaving 50,448 6,508 2,931
Turnover rate 370 % 54 % 16 %
Absenteeism 10 % - 2.5 %
Henry
Ford
$5/day
introduced
Page 6
©SHRM 2010 6
Are better employees worth the additional cost?
Average wages $ 10 / hr $ 17 / hr
Health care 47% get $3500/annum 85% get $5735/annum
Retirement plan 64% get $747/annum 91% get $1330/annum
Employee turnover 44% 17%
Shrinkage 1.7% of sales 0.2% of sales
Cascio, W. F. (2006). Decency means more than "Always low prices": A comparison of Costco to Wal-Mart's Sam's Club. Academy of Management
Perspectives, August, 26-37.
Page 7
©SHRM 2010 7
Total employee costs must include direct & indirect
employee costs
Cascio, W. F. (2006). Decency means more than "Always low prices": A comparison of Costco to Wal-Mart's Sam's Club. Academy of Management
Perspectives, August, 26-37.
All figures are in percent of annual sales for 2005All figures are in percent of annual sales for 2005
Total Employee Cost
= 10.23% of revenue
Total Employee Cost
= 7.26% of revenue
Indirect
costs
Direct
costs
Page 8
©SHRM 2010 8
Efficiency wages work best when…
1. Employees are “pivotal” to business success
2. The organization has a differentiation strategy and serves
premium customers
3. Other HR practices are aligned to compensation
4. Benefits from enhanced selectivity & higher performance
outweigh increased costs of higher pay
Page 9
©SHRM 2010 9
Elements of a reward strategy
• Pay level
• Pay structure
• Pay mix: cash-benefits vs. variable
• Equity-based pay
Page 10
©SHRM 2010 10
10
Pa
y (
Rs. L
ac/a
nn
um
)
Pa
y (
Rs. L
ac/a
nn
um
) “Tournament” Pay System
Page 11
©SHRM 2010 11
Seniors are overpaid & juniors are underpaid
Years of service
Incom
e &
Pro
ductivity
Underpayment
Overpayment
The Twisted Pay
Scale
McKenzie, R. B., & Lee, D. R. (1998). Managing through incentives: How to develop a more collaborative, productive, and profitable organization.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Page 12
©SHRM 2010 12
A hierarchical structure works best when..…
1. Performance can be measured only on a relative basis or over a
period of time
2. The organization relies largely on promotion from within
3. There are fewer opportunities for sabotage by team members
4. It is coupled with higher than market pay
Page 13
©SHRM 2010 13
Elements of a reward strategy
• Pay level
• Pay structure
• Pay mix: cash-benefits vs. variable
• Equity-based pay
Page 14
©SHRM 2010 14
Benefits work best when…
1. Benefits are valued by employees more than what they cost to the
employers
2. Benefits as a cluster support an employer branding strategy of
care and concern for the employees
3. They enable sorting (attracting desired employees)
4. They enhance employee performance and productivity
Page 15
©SHRM 2010 15
An variable pay system divides value created among value
creators depending on their efforts
Value
Creator
A
Value
Creator
B
Returns of B
Efforts of A Efforts of B
Returns of A
Agency Theory Reinforcement Equity Theory
Expectancy Theory Goal Setting
Theory
Page 16
©SHRM 2010 16
Which firm will attract high performers?
Productivity
Inco
me
Firm B
Firm A
P
Page 17
©SHRM 2010 17
Variable pay works best, when…
1. Organizational outcomes are not too volatile
2. Some attrition (sorting) can be tolerated
3. Employees have prior work experience
4. Individual/group outcomes are easily measurable
5. Tangible measures are combined with subjective assessments
6. There is controllability and alignment
Page 18
©SHRM 2010 18
Elements of a reward strategy
• Pay level
• Pay structure
• Pay mix: Fixed-Variable-Benefits
• Equity-based pay
Page 19
©SHRM 2010 19
Accounting or Market (equity) measures?Accounting Measures
(historical)
Market (Equity)
Measures
(futuristic)
Organizational
Strategy
Cost Leadership Differentiation
Firm resource
profile
Slow cycle Fast cycle
Diversification
profile
Unrelated diversification Related diversification
Capital structure Highly leveraged Low leverage
Grossman & Hoskisson, (1998). CEO pay at the crossroads of Wall Street & Main: Toward the strategic design of executive compensation. Academy
of Management Executive, 12(1).
Page 20
©SHRM 2010 20
Stock options work best when…
1. The company is following a differentiation strategy, is in a fast
cycle business, and has diversified in related businesses
2. The company is a start up or is short on free cash
3. In a mature and stable (or rising) stock market
4. They are given in moderate amounts and balanced with stock
grants
5. When firm performance is poor
6. When the employee is new
Page 21
©SHRM 2010 21
All elements of the reward strategy must be well integrated with
other elements of HR strategy as well as the firm strategy
Compensation
Strategy
• Pay level
• Pay structure
• Pay mix
• Equity-based pay
Organization Strategy
HR Strategy
• Recruitment
• Selection
• Training
• Succession planning
Page 22
©SHRM 2010 22©SHRM 2010
Page 23
©SHRM 2010 23
Workforce Trends…
Multi-generational Workforce
Younger age profile and aspiration for better lifestyles
Growth of new industries – IT, BPO
Page 24
©SHRM 2010 24
Employment models…
Multiple employment models
Compensation strategies aligned to different types and
employment models
Page 25
©SHRM 2010 25
Focus is more on Cash…paid
today….
• Employees emphasize more on Fixed pay
Difficult to get them interested in Performance Pay plans
or Stock Plans
Page 26
©SHRM 2010 26
Inflation a concern…
• Inflation touching Compensation budgets in several
ways
Higher salary increases
Fuel costs increasing
Food costs higher
Page 27
©SHRM 2010 27
Performance Management
• Managing differentiation through compensation
remains an issue
• Attention on performance management as never
before
– Need to have a more transparent system
– Identification of high potentials and managing their
development and careers
Page 28
©SHRM 2010 28
Hiring and Premium Skills
Intensifying competition for talent
Niche skills
Internal equity of existing hires vs new hires
Page 29
©SHRM 2010 29
Diverse Markets – Local and Global
Diverse markets
Growth of economy outside the Metros into 2
tier and 3 tier cities
Pressure on hiring quality talent at middle and senior
levels
Global workforce
Pay competitively
Compliance
Page 30
©SHRM 2010 30
Benefit Trends…
Long hours leading to stress….
Increased focus on employee health and well being
Page 31
©SHRM 2010 31
Manufacturing Sector….
• Non management staff a major area of concern
Inflation causing pressure
Employee relations a concern area
• Issue of contract staff salaries and parity with
regular employees