Top Banner
Should We or Should We or Shouldn’t We? Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Speech Pathologists in Education Education Paediatric Language EBP Group Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke Funnell (Leader) [email protected] [email protected]
17

Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) [email protected].

Apr 01, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

Should We or Should We or Shouldn’t We?Shouldn’t We?Should We or Should We or Shouldn’t We?Shouldn’t We?Speech Pathologists in Speech Pathologists in

EducationEducationPaediatric Language EBP Group Paediatric Language EBP Group 20082008

Brooke Funnell (Leader)Brooke Funnell (Leader)

[email protected]@sswahs.nsw.gov.au

Page 2: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

Should Speech Pathologists Work in

Schools?

Page 3: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

How Should Speech Pathologists Work in

Schools?

Page 4: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

In school-aged children with SLI, is a school-based

treatment model an effective way of managing SLI in the

classroom?

In school-aged children with SLI, is an in-class, school-based model better than a withdrawal model in managing SLI in the classroom?

Page 5: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

In school-based treatment for school-aged children with

SLI, is a collaborative or consultative model better

than withdrawal?

Page 6: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

The Papers

• Tollerfield, I. (2003). The process of collaboration within a special school setting: an exploration of the ways in which skills and knowledge are shared and barriers are overcome when a teacher and speech & language therapist collaborate. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 67-84

• Wren, Y., Roulstone, S., Parkhouse, J., Hall, B. (2001). A model for a mainstream school-based speech and language therapy service. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 107-127.

• Hirst, E., Britton, L. (1998). Specialised service to children with specific language impairment in mainstream schools. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33, supp.

Page 7: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

The Papers• McGinty, A.S., Justice, L. (2006).

Classroom-Based versus Pull-Out Interventions: A review of the experimental evidence. EBP Briefs, 1 (1).

Page 8: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

The Papers• Farber, J.G. & Klein, E.R. (1999).

Classroom-Based Assessment of a Collaborative Intervention Program With Kindergarten and First-Grade Students. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 30 (1), 83-91.

Page 9: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

The Papers• Cirrin, F.M. & Gillam, R.B. (2008).

Language Intervention Practices for School-Age Children With Spoken Language Disorders: A Systematic Review. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 39, S110-137.

Page 10: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

The PapersThroneburg, R., Calvert, L., Sturm, J., Paramboukas, A., Paul, P. (2000). A Comparison of Service Delivery Models: Effects of Curricular Vocabulary Skills in the School Setting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 10-20.

CBL: Students with SLI can make positive changes in their knowledge of curricular vocabulary in all 3 service deliveries (collaborative, consultative and withdrawal) but make more change in the collaborative model. Collaborative planning is essential for successful joint teaching programs.

Page 11: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

The PapersHadley, P.A., Simmerman, A., Long, M., Luna, M. (2000). Facilitating Language Development for Inner-City Children: Experimental Evaluation of a Collaborative, Classroom-based Intervention. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 280-295.

CBL: At risk students in Kindergarten & 1st grade involved in collaborative planning and teaching between class teachers and SLPs demonstrated greater change in regards to receptive and expressive vocabulary, as well as letter-sound associations, but no broad improvement in phonological awareness skills when compared with grade-matched peers who weren’t receiving collaborative intervention.

Page 12: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

The CAT’s Clinical Bottom Line

We’re not there yet but the generally feeling is that all forms of intervention work (traditional pull-out, consultative and collaborative), however collaborative is the best though it is the most time consuming and costly.

Page 13: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

Evidence in Practice

Experimental Pre

Experimental Post

Control Pre

Control Post

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Page 14: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

Evidence in Practice

PRE

POST

Control

TT

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

COMBINEDSCORES

PHASE

CLASS

Control

TT

Page 15: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

Evidence in Practice

Low GroupPre Low Group

Post Mid Group PreMid Group

Post High GroupPre High Group

Post

Control

Team Teaching0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Control

Team Teaching

Page 16: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

2008s Achievements

• Academics– Thank you Natalie Munro &

Kimberley Docking

• New members• Attendance

– Thank you everyone

• Teleconferencing– 3/4

• ACT link ups

Page 17: Should We or Shouldn’t We? Speech Pathologists in Education Paediatric Language EBP Group 2008 Brooke Funnell (Leader) Brooke.Funnell@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.

Where To Now?

• Comprehension• Specific treatment options –

teaching text types• ASD