Rural Development Statistics Socio-Economic Characteristics SECTION -2: SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS The data relating to different socio-economic aspects of rural people have been covered in this section viz., Net Domestic Product by Economic Activity, Rural and Urban Incomes, Work Force, Occupation-wise number of Workers, Labour Force Estimates, Migration details, Literacy Rates, Employment and Unemployment estimates and Incidence of Poverty. State-wise data are furnished for the recent years. 2.1: Time-series data (from 1950–51 to 2011–12) on the Gross National Product , Net National Product and also the Per Capita Net National Product both at current and constant prices are shown. 2.2 & 2.3 : The percentage contribution of different “industry” groups to Net Domestic Product for some selected years during 1999-2000 to 2007-08 and Gross Domestic Product for the period 2004-05 to 2008-09 are presented at constant prices in this table. 2.4: The Net Domestic Product (NDP) industry-wise for rural and urban areas are worked out by CSO for a few selected years and the details are shown. 2.5 : Data on Net State Domestic Product state-wise at current prices for some selected years i.e 2004-05 to 2010–11 are furnished. 2.6 : Growth rates of Net State Domestic Product state-wise at current prices for some selected years i.e. 2005-06 to 2010–11 are presented. 2.7 : This table provides the per capita Net State Domestic Product figures at current prices for selected years during the period 2004-05 to 2010–11. 2.8 : Growth rates of Net State Domestic Product state-wise at current prices for some selected years i.e. 2005-06 to 2010–11 are presented. 2.9 : This table presents the per capita Net State Domestic Product values at constant prices (2004- 05) for selected years during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10. 2.10 : Rates of Growth of SDP by major states for eighth, ninth and tenth plan periods are shown. 2.11: Target growth rates of GDP by major industry at factor cost for eleventh five year plan state-wise are presented. 2.12: Sectoral Growth during Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh plan are presented. 2.13 Disparities in per capita GSDP are highlights of this table. 2.14 Industry-wise annual growth rates of GDP per worker are presented for selected years. 2.15 & 2.16: This table contains data on the population figures and labour force growth for some selected years. 2.17: Estimates of Rural Labour Force Participation Rates sex-wise for different NSS rounds viz., 1993-94, 1999-2000, 2004-05, 2007-08 & 2009-10 are shown. 2.18 to 2.24: Labour force participation rate for all persons and for persons in age group of 15-59 years by Usual Principal Status, Principal status & Subsidiary status, Current Weekly Status and Current Daily Status for the year 2009-10 are presented in these tables. 2.25 : The population census classifies the persons into Main Workers, Marginal Workers and Non- workers. Main workers are those who have worked a major part of the year preceding date of enumeration. Marginal workers are those who have worked at any time in a year preceding data of enumeration while Non-workers are those who have not worked at any time in a year preceding data of enumeration. The percentage distribution of Cultivators, Agricultural Labourers, Household Industry Workers and Other Workers in the Total Workers (Main+Marginal) for the census year 2001 is shown in this table. 2.26 & 2.27: Presented are the data on distribution of rural workers by major occupations in 2001 State-wise and Sex-wise. 2.28 to 2.42: The National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) collects data on Employment and Unemployment periodically. The estimates thrown up by the NSSO on the employment and unemployment rates are based on the three approaches viz., usual status approach, current weekly status approach, and current daily status approach. The estimates of number of workers, unemployed and persons out of labour force as developed by National Sample Survey
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
SECTION -2: SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
The data relating to different socio-economic aspects of rural people have been covered in this section viz., Net Domestic Product by Economic Activity, Rural and Urban Incomes, Work Force, Occupation-wise number of Workers, Labour Force Estimates, Migration details, Literacy Rates, Employment and Unemployment estimates and Incidence of Poverty. State-wise data are furnished for the recent years. 2.1: Time-series data (from 1950–51 to 2011–12) on the Gross National Product , Net National
Product and also the Per Capita Net National Product both at current and constant prices are shown.
2.2 & 2.3 : The percentage contribution of different “industry” groups to Net Domestic Product for some selected years during 1999-2000 to 2007-08 and Gross Domestic Product for the period 2004-05 to 2008-09 are presented at constant prices in this table.
2.4: The Net Domestic Product (NDP) industry-wise for rural and urban areas are worked out by CSO for a few selected years and the details are shown.
2.5 : Data on Net State Domestic Product state-wise at current prices for some selected years i.e 2004-05 to 2010–11 are furnished.
2.6 : Growth rates of Net State Domestic Product state-wise at current prices for some selected years i.e. 2005-06 to 2010–11 are presented.
2.7 : This table provides the per capita Net State Domestic Product figures at current prices for selected years during the period 2004-05 to 2010–11.
2.8 : Growth rates of Net State Domestic Product state-wise at current prices for some selected years i.e. 2005-06 to 2010–11 are presented.
2.9 : This table presents the per capita Net State Domestic Product values at constant prices (2004-05) for selected years during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10.
2.10 : Rates of Growth of SDP by major states for eighth, ninth and tenth plan periods are shown.
2.11: Target growth rates of GDP by major industry at factor cost for eleventh five year plan state-wise are presented.
2.12: Sectoral Growth during Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh plan are presented.
2.13 Disparities in per capita GSDP are highlights of this table.
2.14 Industry-wise annual growth rates of GDP per worker are presented for selected years.
2.15 & 2.16: This table contains data on the population figures and labour force growth for some selected
years.
2.17: Estimates of Rural Labour Force Participation Rates sex-wise for different NSS rounds viz., 1993-94, 1999-2000, 2004-05, 2007-08 & 2009-10 are shown.
2.18 to 2.24: Labour force participation rate for all persons and for persons in age group of 15-59 years by Usual Principal Status, Principal status & Subsidiary status, Current Weekly Status and Current Daily Status for the year 2009-10 are presented in these tables.
2.25 : The population census classifies the persons into Main Workers, Marginal Workers and Non-workers. Main workers are those who have worked a major part of the year preceding date of enumeration. Marginal workers are those who have worked at any time in a year preceding data of enumeration while Non-workers are those who have not worked at any time in a year preceding data of enumeration. The percentage distribution of Cultivators, Agricultural Labourers, Household Industry Workers and Other Workers in the Total Workers (Main+Marginal) for the census year 2001 is shown in this table.
2.26 & 2.27: Presented are the data on distribution of rural workers by major occupations in 2001 State-wise and Sex-wise.
2.28 to 2.42:
The National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) collects data on Employment and Unemployment periodically. The estimates thrown up by the NSSO on the employment and unemployment rates are based on the three approaches viz., usual status approach, current weekly status approach, and current daily status approach. The estimates of number of workers, unemployed and persons out of labour force as developed by National Sample Survey
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Organisation for different states in different NSS Rounds are included in these tables following the three approaches for both males and females separately.
2.43 : Sex-wise literacy rates as per population census in rural and urban areas for the years 1951, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001 and 2011 are shown.
2.44 : Sex-wise literacy rates in rural and urban areas for the years 1983 to 2009-10 are presented based on NSSO rounds.
2.45 : The literacy rates of the rural population aged 7 years and above (sex-wise) in different states and UTs according to 2001 and 2011 censuses are provided.
2.46 : State-wise and Sex-wise literacy levels in each state and UT for the year 2001 and 2011 are given.
2.47 The table contains data on the percentage distribution of migrants by sex and type of migrants –1991 & 2001.
2.48: Percentage distribution of migrants by duration of stay as per 2001 census is included in this table.
2.49 to 2.52: Migration rates obtained from different NSS rounds are presented.
2.53: Number of migrants in India by rural-urban status of place of last residence and place of enumeration as per 2001 census is presented.
2.54: Sex wise number of migrants by place of last residence in India as per 2001 census is presented.
2.55: Percentage distribution of indebted rural labour households by purpose-wise 2004-05 is presented.
2.56: Percentage distribution of indebted rural labour households by source of debt (2004-05) is shown.
2.56 : The estimates of number of rural households, farmer households and indebted farmer
households in the states and UTs are presented for the year 2003.
2.57 : Data on incidence of indebtedness across different farm size groups in selected states are shown.
2.58: Data on indebtedness of farm households in four states for the year 2003 are presented.
2.59: Incidence of indebtedness among rural labour households 2004-05 is presented.
2.60: Extent of indebtedness among rural labour households 2004-05 is presented.
2.61 to 2.63: Farmer suicides in selected states and suicide rate per lakh population for the years 1997 to 2006 are presented in these tables.
2.64: Daily rates of minimum wages for agricultural workers 2010 are included.
2.65, 2.66 & 2.67::
Average wage/ salary earnings per day received by casual labours of age 15-59 years engaged in public works and other than public works for the year 2009-10 are presented.
2.68: Inequalities in consumption expenditure in rural areas of major states for different years are presented. The gini-coefficients are based on NSS consumption expenditure data.
2.69 : The percentage shares of bottom 30 per cent population in consumption expenditure in rural areas of major states for different years are included.
2.70: The percentage shares of top 30 per cent population in consumption expenditure in rural areas of major states for different years are included.
2.71: The average quantity and value of cereals consumed for the years 1987-88 to 2009-11 are presented.
2.72 : Monthly per capita consumer expenditure on food and non-food items of the rural households during July 2009 – June 2010 in different states are shown.
2.73 :
Data on monthly per capita consumer expenditure on cereals for the year 2009-10 are included.
2.74 & 2.75: Monthly average quantity and value of consumption of different cereals per person in 2009-10 are shown in these tables.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
2.76: Data on per capita cereal consumption in major states are presented for different NSSO rounds.
2.77: Consumption expenditure on different items per person for a period of 30 days for different NSS rounds is presented in this table.
2.78: This table shows the Lorenz ratios of Consumption Expenditure distribution of population in States / UTs for 2009-10.
2.79: Data on Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers- All – India- (Base year: 1986-87=100) for the years 1995-96 to 2010-11 are given.
2.80: State-wise Consumer Price Indices for “Food” and “General” items in the case of Agricultural Labourers for selected years are presented.
2.81: The official estimates of incidence of poverty are included in this table both for rural and urban areas and for specific years.
2.82 : This table presents data on several indicators of poverty such as Head Count index / Poverty Ratio, Poverty Gap Index and Lorenz Ratio for different time periods during 1973-74 to 2004-05.
2.83: Indices of Poverty and Inequalities (Headcount Ratio, Poverty Gap, Squared Poverty Gap and Gini Coefficient) for the years 1983, 1987-88, 1993-94 and 2004-05 are presented for major states in these tables.
2.84 : State-specific Poverty Lines (Rs. per month per capita) relating to the rural areas of different States and UTs for the years 1973-74, 1983, 1993-94, 1999-2000, 2004-05 and 2009-10 are furnished.
2.85, 2.86, 2.87 2.88 & 2.89, :
These tables provide data on the absolute number of poor and poverty ratios in rural, urban and combined areas of each State/UT for the years 1993-94, 1999-2000 and 2004-05. (Uniform Recall Period and Mixed Recall Period for the year 2004-05)
2.90: Estimated levels of poverty and number of poor 2009-10 are shown.
2.91, 2.92 & 2.93: These tables contain state-wise values and ranks on Human Development Index (HDI) and Human Poverty Index (HPI).
2.94: Distribution of households classified according to the availability of two square meals a day in the rural and urban parts of the country is given.
2.95: State-wise distribution of households according to the availability of two square meals a day is given in this table for the year 2004 – 05.
2.96: The distribution of households by household type and according to the availability of two square meals a day in the rural areas is presented in the table
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Highlights
During the current decade Indian economy grew at an impressive rate and
even the per capita income registered a rate of growth over 5 per cent during
the period.
The share of agriculture in NDP has been declining at the rate of one per cent
per annum in the recent years (at 1999-2000 prices). The share of rural areas
in NDP has fallen from 59 per cent to 48 per cent in 24 years period ending
with 2004-05. The agriculture growth rate has been still lagging behind the
target growth rate of 4 per cent.
The rural-urban differences in per capita NDP has widened during 1980-81 to
2004-05.
Among the major states, the states of Haryana, Punjab, Maharashtra and
Tamil Nadu had per capita income levels above Rs. 30,000 at 1999-00 prices.
Bihar is on the other extreme with per capita income of Rs. 8056 in 2006-
07.The inter-state variations in per capita income have been on the rise. As
far as the per capita GSDP is concerned, rank of Bihar is the lowest while
Punjab and Maharashtra are competing for the first place.
The rural labour force has been declining partly due to migration of workers to
urban areas and also due to increased participation of youth in education.
The percentage of cultivators among workers was high in the major states of
Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh and
Rajasthan. The casualisation is still significant phenomenon in rural areas.
The dependency of workforce on agriculture has reduced for male workers
but not for female workers. The number of employed has gone up by 40
millions in two decades ending with 2004-05 i.e at the rate of 2 millions per
annum. It is disheartening to note that 92 per cent of workforce are engaged
in informal sector. The unemployment levels in rural India still hover around 8
per cent.
The rural-urban and gender differences galore in literacy levels even while the
levels have been rising.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
The rural-rural, intra-state and female migration are the dominant streams of
migration in India. The employment related factors are responsible for
migration of males while marriage is driving force in respect of females. As
per NSS data, migration rates have been rising in rural India.
Nearly 50 per cent of Indian farmers are indebted and average debt is of the
order of Rs. 12680/- which implies that rest do not have access to any source
of credit. In Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Jharkhand
almost 70 to 80 per cent did not have access to credit facility at all; similar is
the situation in the North-East. Average outstanding loan per farmer was high
in Punjab, Kerala, Haryana, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. Over 60 per
cent of indebted farmers were marginal farmers. Moneylenders’ share in
outstanding loans was one-fourth while banks account for more than one-third
of the debt. The indebtedness was one of the main reasons for farmers’
suicides in India and suicide rate was about 1.55 per lakh farmers in 2005.
The agricultural wages have gone up during the recent years largely due to
MGNREGA.
The gini coefficient of inequality in consumption expenditure has gone up
during the last three decades. Also the share of bottom 30 per cent population
remained more or less stable in most of the states and it varied between 13
per cent and 19 per cent. The average consumption of cereals,
the principal source of calories has been declining over the years. Further, the
share of food in total consumption expenditure at the aggregate level was
almost 50 per cent. These together indicate that poverty levels in rural India
are high. While official estimates of rural poverty was 28 per cent in 2004-05,
the Tendulkar Committee places it at 42 per cent. However, inequality among
the poor has been reduced. The human poverty is higher than income /
NNP: Net National Product GNP: Gross National Product Q: Quick Estimates A: Advance Estimates Source: GOI , Ministry of Finance, Economic Survey 2011-12.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.2: Gross Domestic Product by Broad Industry (2004-05 to 2008-09)
(At 2004-05 Prices) (Percentage distribution)
S.No. Industry
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
1. Agriculture, Forest and Fishing
18.9 18.1 17.2 16.4 15.7
2. Mining and Quarrying
2.9 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.4
3. Manufacturing
15.3 15.3 16.0 16.2 15.6
4. Electricity, Gas and Water Supply
2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
5. Construction
7.7 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.0
6. Trade, Hotel and Restaurant
16.1 16.5 16.7 16.8 16.6
7. Transport, Storage and Communication
8.4 8.6 8.8 9.1 9.6
8. Financing, Insurance, Real Estate and Business Service
14.7 15.1 15.8 16.4 16.9
9. Community, Social and Personal Services
13.9 13.7 12.8 12.5 13.4
Source: GOI, Central Statistical Organisation, National Accounts Statistics 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.3: Net Domestic Product by Industry (1999-2000 to 2007-08)
Source: GOI, Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy, 2010-11, Reserve Bank of India.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.10: Growth Rates of State Domestic Product in Different States (% per annum)
S.No. State/UT Eighth plan Ninth Plan
Tenth Plan
Target Actual #
Non-special Category States
1. Andhra Pradesh 5.4 4.6 6.8 6.7
2. Bihar 2.2 4.0 6.2 4.7
3. Goa 8.9 5.5 9.2 7.8
4. Gujarat 12.4 4.0 10.2 10.6
5. Haryana 5.2 4.1 7.9 7.6
6. Karnataka 6.2 7.2 10.1 7.0
7. Kerala 6.5 5.7 7.9 7.2
8. Madhya Pradesh 6.3 4.0 10.1 4.3
9. Maharashtra 8.9 4.7 6.5 7.9
10. Odisha 2.1 5.1 7.0 9.1
11. Punjab 4.7 4.4 7.4 4.5
12. Rajasthan 7.5 3.5 6.2 5.0
13. Tamil Nadu 7.0 6.3 6.4 6.6
14. Uttar Pradesh 4.9 4.0 8.3 4.6
15. West Bengal 6.3 6.9 8.0 6.1
16. Chhattisgarh N.A N.A 6.1 9.2
17. Jharkhand N.A N.A 6.9 11.1
Special Category States
18. Arunachal Pradesh 5.1 4.4 8.0 5.8
19. Assam 2.8 2.1 6.2 6.1
20. Himachal Pradesh 6.5 5.9 8.9 7.3
21. Jammu and Kashmir 5.0 5.2 6.3 5.2
22. Manipur 4.6 6.4 6.5 11.6
23. Meghalaya 3.8 6.2 6.3 5.6
24. Mizoram N.A N.A 5.3 5.9
25. Nagaland 8.9 2.6 5.6 8.3
26. Sikkim 5.3 8.3 7.9 7.7
27. Tripura 6.6 7.4 7.3 8.7
28. Uttarkhand N.A N.A 6.8 8.8
#: Average of 2002-03 to 2005-06 for all states except J & K, Mizoram, Nagaland (2002-03) and Tripura (2002-03 to 2003-04).
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan, 2007-2012, Volume-I, Inclusive Growth.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.11: State-wise Growth Targets for the Eleventh Five Year Plan Period (Annual Average in %)
S.No. State/UT State wise Growth Target GSDP Growth
Agriculture Industry Services
Non-special Category States
1. Andhra Pradesh 4.0 12.0 10.4 9.5
2. Bihar 7.0 8.0 8.0 7.6
3. Chhattisgarh 1.7 12.0 8.0 8.6
4. Goa 7.7 15.7 9.0 12.1
5. Gujarat 5.5 14.0 10.5 11.2
6. Haryana 5.3 14.0 12.0 11.0
7. Jharkhand 6.3 12.0 8.0 9.8
8. Karnataka 5.4 12.5 12.0 11.2
9. Kerala 0.3 9.0 11.0 9.5
10. Madhya Pradesh 4.4 8.0 7.0 6.7
11. Maharashtra 4.4 8.0 10.2 9.1
12. Odisha 3.0 12.0 9.6 8.8
13. Punjab 2.4 8.0 7.4 5.9
14. Rajasthan 3.5 8.0 8.9 7.4
15. Tamil Nadu 4.7 8.0 9.4 8.5
16. Uttar Pradesh 3.0 8.0 7.1 6.1
17. West Bengal 4.0 11.0 11.0 9.7
Special Category States
18. Arunachal Pradesh 2.8 8.0 7.2 6.4
19. Assam 2.0 8.0 8.0 6.5
20. Himachal Pradesh 3.0 14.5 7.5 9.5
21. Jammu and Kashmir 4.3 9.8 6.4 6.4
22. Manipur 1.2 8.0 7.0 5.9
23. Meghalaya 4.7 8.0 7.9 7.3
24. Mizoram 1.6 8.0 8.0 7.1
25. Nagaland 8.4 8.0 10.0 9.3
26. Sikkim 3.3 8.0 7.2 6.7
27. Tripura 1.4 8.0 8.0 6.9
28. Uttarakhand 3.0 12.0 11.0 9.9
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan, 2007-2012, Volume-I, Inclusive Growth.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.12: Sectoral Growth during Recent Five Year Plans
(% per annum)
Industry Eighth Plan (1992-96)
Ninth Plan (1997-2001)
Tenth Plan (2002-06)
Eleventh Plan
(2007-11)
Agriculture 4.72 2.44 2.30 4.0
Industry 7.29 4.29 9.17 10-11
Services 7.28 7.87 9.30 9-11
Total 6.54 5.52 7.74 9.0
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan, 2007-2012, Volume-I, Inclusive Growth.
Table 2.13: Disparities in Per Capita GSDP
Year State with lowest per
capita GSDP
State with highest * per capita GSDP
Ratio of Minimum to Maximum per
capita GSDP
Coefficient of Variation
Gini Coefficient $
(in %) Weighted
1993-94 Bihar Punjab 30.527 34.549 0.1917
1996-97 Bihar Maharashtra 27.586 36.781 0.2071
1999-2000 Bihar Maharashtra 28.899 37.417 0.2173
2001-02 Bihar Punjab 21.556 35.610 0.2078
2002-03 Bihar Punjab 21.608 36.686 0.2771
2003-04 Bihar Punjab 22.705 36.230 0.2290
2004-05 Bihar Maharashtra 20.105 38.440 0.2409
Note: 1993-94, 1996-97 and 1999-2000 as per the Twelfth Finance Commission report based on 1993-94 series, 2001-02 onwards. Comparable GSDP 1999-2000 series.
*: Excluding Goa $: Weighted by population . 1993-94, 1996-97 and 1999-2000 data relate to 14 states. (Assam and
general category states excluding Goa) as per Twelfth Finance Commission and data for 2001-02 to 2004-05 related to 27 states (excluding Goa).
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan, 2007-2012, Volume-I, Inclusive Growth.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.14: Annual Growth Rates of GDP Per Worker–Industry-wise
(%)
Industry 1983 to 1993-94
1993-94 to 2004-05
2006-07 to 2016-17 *
Agriculture 1.03 2.24 4.57
Mining and Quarrying 1.66 4.95 5.64
Manufacturing 2.29 3.31 7.27
Electricity, gas and water supply 3.70 5.46 7.51
Construction -1.43 1.45 5.56
Trade, hotels and restaurants 1.06 2.69 5.68
Transport, storage and communication 2.06 4.94 9.77
Finance, insurance, real estate and business services
2.79 -0.40 4.26
Community, social and personal services
1.57 5.90 6.11
Total 2.29 4.35 7.82
*: Projection.
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan, 2007-2012, Volume-I, Inclusive Growth.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
B. LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES (LFPR)
Table 2.15: Population Projections in Different Periods
ps : principal status ps+ss : principal and subsidiary status.
Source: GOI, NSSO, Key indicators of Employment and Unemployment in India, 2009-10.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
.
Table 2.29: Number of Persons / Person Weeks / Persondays Employed for Different Age-Groups [Usual Status’, ‘Current Weekly Status’, ‘Current Daily Status’]
ps: principal status ; ps+ss: principal and subsidiary status ; CWS: Current Weekly Status (Per 1000 Person weeks) ; CDS : Current Daily Status (Per 1000 Persondays) Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 531, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 64
thRound, July 2007 – June 2008.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.30: Distribution of the Usually Employed by Status of Employment – Males
Rural India (Per thousand persons)
Round Principal Status (PS) All (PS+SS)
Self -employed
Regular employees
Casual labour
Self -employed
Regular employees
Casual labour
66th (2009-10) 530 87 383 535 85 380
64th (2007-08) 549 93 359 554 91 355
62nd
(2005-06) 561 102 337 567 100 333
61st (2004-05) 576 91 333 581 90 329
55th (1999 – 2000) 544 90 366 550 88 362
50th (1993-1994) 567 87 346 577 85 338
43rd (1987 – 1988) 575 104 321 586 100 314
38th (1983) 595 106 299 605 103 292
PS: Principal Status SS: Subsidiary Status. Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India,
66th Round, July 2009- June 2010.
Table 2.31: Distribution of the Usually Employed by Status of Employment – Females
Rural India (Per thousand persons)
Round Principal Status (PS) All (PS+SS)
Self -employed
Regular employees
Casual labour
Self -employ
ed
Regular employees
Casual labour
66th (2009-10) 503 55 442 557 44 399
64th (2007-08) 508 53 439 583 41 376
62nd
(2005-06) 544 53 403 622 39 339
61st (2004-05) 564 48 389 637 37 326
55th (1999 – 2000) 500 39 461 573 31 396
50th (1993-1994) 513 34 453 586 27 387
43rd (1987 – 1988) 549 49 402 608 37 355
38th (1983) 541 37 422 619 28 353
PS: Principal Status SS: Subsidiary Status.
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66
th Round, July 2009- June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.32: Distribution of Usually Employed Persons by Broad Industry-Division
Rural India
(Per thousand persons)
NSS Round (Survey Period)
Male
Primary Secondary Tertiary
ps all ps all ps All
64th (2007-08) 662 665 164 162 175 176
62nd
(2005-06) 648 652 167 165 185 183
61st (2004-05) 662 665 157 155 181 180
55th (1999 – 2000) 712 714 127 126 161 160
50th (1993-1994) 737 741 113 112 148 147
43rd (1987 – 1988) 739 745 123 121 138 134
38th (1983) 772 775 102 100 123 122
Female
64th (2007-08) 816 835 103 97 82 69
62nd
(2005-06) 798 813 121 120 82 68
61st (2004-05) 814 833 108 101 78 66
55th (1999 – 2000) 841 854 93 89 66 57
50th (1993-1994) 847 862 91 83 62 55
43rd (1987 – 1988) 825 847 112 100 63 53
38th (1983) 862 875 78 74 57 48
PS: Principal Status All: Principal Status & Subsidiary Status.
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report Nos. 522 & 531, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 62
nd and 64
th Round, July 2005 – June 2006 and July 2007- June 2008.
Table 2.33: Distribution of Employed Persons by Category of Employment (CDS) – Rural India
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan, 2007-2012, Volume-I, Inclusive Growth.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.34: Distribution of Workers by Type of Employment Sector
(in Millions)
Sector 1999-2000 2004-05
Informal Formal Total Informal Formal Total
Unorgnised sector 341.28 (99.60)
1.36 (0.40)
342.64 (100.0)
393.47 (99.64)
1.43 (0.36)
394.90 (100.0)
Organised sector 20.46 (37.80)
33.67 (62.20)
54.12 (100.0)
29.14 (46.58)
33.42 (53.42)
62.57 (100.0)
Total 361.74 (91.17)
35.02 (8.83)
396.76 (100.0)
422.61 (92.38)
34.85 (7.46)
457.46 (100.0)
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan, 2007-2012, Volume-I, Inclusive Growth.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.35 (a): Distribution of Usually Employed by Category of Employment-Rural Males (July 2009 – June 2010)
(Per thousand males)
S. No.
State Principal Status Principal and Subsidiary Status
Self- Employed
Regular / Wage
salaried employees
Casual Labour
Self- Employed
Regular / Wage
salaried employees
Casual Labour
1. Andhra Pradesh 418 94 488 419 93 488
2. Arunachal Pradesh 766 192 42 768 190 42
3. Assam 715 92 193 718 91 191
4. Bihar 519 33 448 520 33 447
5. Chhattisgarh 378 72 550 379 71 550
6. Delhi 81 620 299 81 620 299
7. Goa 325 585 90 325 585 90
8. Gujarat 526 89 386 531 88 382
9. Haryana 543 204 253 549 200 251
10. Himachal Pradesh 543 216 242 548 212 240
11. Jammu & Kashmir 606 209 184 630 197 173
12. Jharkhand 598 57 344 601 57 343
13. Karnataka 480 69 451 484 69 447
14. Kerala 380 180 440 388 176 435
15. Madhya Pradesh 552 60 388 552 60 387
16. Maharashtra 479 104 417 479 102 419
17. Manipur 777 148 76 776 146 79
18. Meghalaya 534 118 348 541 116 344
19. Mizoram 836 126 37 834 125 40
20. Nagaland 784 207 9 799 192 9
21. Odisha 558 72 370 559 71 369
22. Punjab 480 137 383 484 136 380
23. Rajasthan 675 85 241 677 84 239
24. Sikkim 584 287 128 585 287 128
25. Tamil Nadu 333 122 545 332 122 545
26. Tripura 512 106 382 502 104 394
27. Uttarakhand 623 138 239 631 133 236
28. Uttar Pradesh 657 55 287 668 53 279
29. West Bengal 450 85 466 452 83 464
UTs
30. A & N Islands 486 372 144 481 374 147
31. Chandigarh 126 652 222 126 652 222
32. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 513 138 349 513 138 349
33. Daman & Diu 191 419 390 191 419 390
34. Lakshadweep 420 284 296 415 280 293
35. Puducherry 211 224 565 220 221 559
All-India 530 87 383 535 85 380
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66
th Round, July 2009- June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.35 (b): Distribution of Usually Employed by Category of Employment–Rural Female (July 2009 – June 2010)
(Per thousand Females)
S. No.
State Principal Status Principal and Subsidiary Status
Self -Employed
Regular / Wage
salaried employees
Casual Labour
Self- Employed
Regular / Wage
salaried employees
Casual Labour
1. Andhra Pradesh 388 39 573 395 37 569
2. Arunachal Pradesh 889 84 28 891 82 28
3. Assam 590 133 277 653 108 239
4. Bihar 412 40 548 479 26 495
5. Chhattisgarh 398 11 591 402 11 587
6. Delhi 0 131 879 0 131 879
7. Goa 18 839 144 18 839 144
8. Gujarat 571 29 400 598 25 377
9. Haryana 732 130 137 754 71 175
10. Himachal Pradesh 887 72 41 894 61 44
11. Jammu & Kashmir 745 214 42 947 43 11
12. Jharkhand 750 42 209 775 33 192
13. Karnataka 415 58 527 428 56 516
14. Kerala 341 285 374 421 238 342
15. Madhya Pradesh 486 18 496 496 17 487
16. Maharashtra 465 20 515 499 18 483
17. Manipur 796 46 159 707 38 255
18. Meghalaya 711 62 227 674 55 271
19. Mizoram 959 27 15 880 25 96
20. Nagaland 889 102 9 888 55 56
21. Odisha 468 55 477 554 43 404
22. Punjab 278 388 333 811 77 112
23. Rajasthan 789 29 181 713 19 268
24. Sikkim 665 233 102 647 223 129
25. Tamil Nadu 338 65 597 333 66 601
26. Tripura 407 168 425 220 81 700
27. Uttarakhand 929 30 41 898 21 81
28. Uttar Pradesh 710 49 240 782 26 192
29. West Bengal 437 136 427 509 89 403
UTs
30. A & N Islands 514 445 41 537 346 117
31. Chandigarh 57 943 0 57 943 0
32. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 108 54 865 108 54 865
33. Daman & Diu 214 107 679 221 105 674
34. Lakshadweep 154 692 154 552 310 138
35. Puducherry 274 56 670 289 53 658
All-India 503 55 442 557 44 399
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66
th Round, July 2009- June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.35 (c): Distribution of Usually Employed by Category of Employment–Rural Persons (July 2009 – June 2010)
(Per thousand Persons)
S. No.
State Principal Status Principal and Subsidiary Status
Self- Employed
Regular / Wage
salaried employees
Casual Labour
Self-Employed
Regular / Wage
salaried employees
Casual Labour
1. Andhra Pradesh 406 72 523 408 69 522
2. Arunachal Pradesh 807 156 37 809 154 37
3. Assam 694 99 207 705 94 201
4. Bihar 511 33 455 516 32 452
5. Chhattisgarh 386 47 567 388 46 566
6. Delhi 77 596 327 77 596 327
7. Goa 271 629 99 271 629 99
8. Gujarat 538 72 390 553 67 380
9. Haryana 578 190 232 609 163 229
10. Himachal Pradesh 689 154 156 708 143 150
11. Jammu & Kashmir 619 209 172 735 146 120
12. Jharkhand 627 54 319 640 51 308
13. Karnataka 456 65 479 463 64 473
14. Kerala 370 207 423 398 194 407
15. Madhya Pradesh 532 47 420 535 47 419
16. Maharashtra 473 73 454 487 69 444
17. Manipur 781 122 96 756 115 129
18. Meghalaya 596 99 306 590 93 317
19. Mizoram 880 90 29 852 87 62
20. Nagaland 811 179 9 833 140 27
21. Odisha 538 68 394 558 63 379
22. Punjab 465 156 379 581 118 301
23. Rajasthan 708 68 223 691 58 251
24. Sikkim 609 270 120 605 266 129
25. Tamil Nadu 335 98 567 333 99 569
26. Tripura 498 114 388 435 99 466
27. Uttarakhand 735 99 167 750 83 167
28. Uttar Pradesh 665 55 280 696 46 257
29. West Bengal 448 91 461 463 84 453
UTs
30. A & N Islands 490 386 124 493 367 140
31. Chandigarh 113 700 186 113 700 186
32. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 485 133 382 485 133 382
33. Daman & Diu 195 358 445 197 356 445
34. Lakshadweep 372 351 277 446 295 250
35. Puducherry 235 160 605 246 156 598
All-India 523 78 399 542 73 386
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66
th Round, July 2009- June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.36: Distribution of Usually Rural Employed in the Principal Status (PS) and Principal as well as Subsidiary Status
(July 2009 – June 2010) (Per thousand Persons)
S. No.
State Male Female Person
PS workers All workers PS workers All workers PS workers All workers
1. Andhra Pradesh 594 598 413 443 504 521
2. Arunachal Pradesh 494 499 288 293 399 404
3. Assam 548 553 128 158 351 368
4. Bihar 478 481 43 65 271 283
5. Chhattisgarh 507 511 362 371 436 442
6. Delhi 601 601 28 28 301 301
7. Goa 526 526 127 127 339 339
8. Gujarat 579 585 247 320 421 459
9. Haryana 512 522 135 250 338 396
10. Himachal Pradesh 546 556 400 468 473 512
11. Jammu & Kashmir 529 563 55 292 298 431
12. Jharkhand 485 491 125 159 313 333
13. Karnataka 619 624 359 370 489 497
14. Kerala 550 564 176 218 354 383
15. Madhya Pradesh 555 556 266 282 418 426
16. Maharashtra 566 576 354 396 463 488
17. Manipur 493 499 175 212 339 361
18. Meghalaya 568 580 330 371 454 480
19. Mizoram 596 598 370 404 488 506
20. Nagaland 464 500 174 319 322 411
21. Odisha 575 578 164 243 370 410
22. Punjab 525 531 45 240 293 391
23. Rajasthan 503 510 220 357 365 436
24. Sikkim 556 556 296 309 436 442
25. Tamil Nadu 602 603 391 405 493 501
26. Tripura 571 583 91 188 336 390
27. Uttarakhand 443 461 274 399 362 431
28. Uttar Pradesh 481 504 90 174 292 344
29. West Bengal 594 608 91 152 356 392
UTs
30. A & N Islands 575 583 154 199 379 404
31. Chandigarh 522 522 93 93 301 301
32. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 556 556 42 42 311 311
33. Daman & Diu 574 574 193 198 414 416
34. Lakshadweep 650 658 105 245 384 456
35. Puducherry 624 631 331 349 468 481
All-India 537 547 202 261 374 408
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66
th Round, July 2009- June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
D. UNEMPLOYMENT
Table 2.37: Rural Unemployment Rates * (July 2007 – June, 2008 & July 2009- June 2010)
(Per thousand persons)
Unemployment Rate
Status 2007-08 2009-10
Male Female Person Male Female Person
Usual status - PS
23 (13)
19 (4)
22 (9)
19 (11)
24 (5)
21 (8)
Usual status (adjusted) 19 (11)
11 (3)
16 (7)
16 (9)
16 (4)
16 (7)
Current Weekly Status
41 (22)
35 (9)
39 (16)
32 (17)
37 (8)
33 (13)
Current Daily Status
85 (45)
81 (17)
84 (31)
64 (35)
80 (16)
68 (25)
*: According to Usual Status, Current Weekly Status (CWS) and Current Daily Status (CDS).
Note: Figures within brackets indicate the proportion of unemployed per 1000 persons / person-weeks / persondays. Source: GOI, NSSO, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66th Round (July 2009 – June 2010).
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.38: Unemployment Rates (Rural Areas) in Different years
(Per thousand males / females)
NSS Round Unemployment rate
Male Female
Usual Status
Usual Status
(Adjusted)
Current Weekly Status
Current Daily
Status
Usual Status
Usual Status
(Adjusted)
Current Weekly Status
Current Daily
Status
66th (2009-10)
19 16 32 64 24 16 37 80
64th (2007-08)
23 19 41 85 19 11 35 81
62nd
(2005-06)
25 20 43 83 22 12 33 75
61st (2004-05)
21 16 38 80 31 18 42 87
55th (1999-2000)
21 17 39 72 15 10 37 70
50th (1993-94)
20 14 31 56 13 9 29 56
43rd (1987-88)
28 18 42 46 35 24 44 67
38th (1983)
21 14 37 75 14 7 43 90
32nd
(1977-78)
22 13 36 71 55 20 41 92
27th (1972-73)
-- 12 30 68 -- 5 55 112
Note: Unemployment rates are expressed in persons under usual status, person weeks under CWS and persondays under CDS.
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report Nos. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66
th Round, July 2009 – June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.39: Unemployment Rates Among the Youth (15-29 years)
(1993-94, 1999-2000 and 2004-2005)
(Per 1000 persons)
Age groups (year)
Unemployment Rate
1993-94 1999-2000 2004-2005
Usual Status
Usual Status (Adjusted)
Current Weekly Status
Current Daily
Status
Usual Status
Usual Status
(Adjusted)
Current Weekly Status
Current Daily
Status
Usual Status
Usual Status (Adjusted)
Current Weekly Status
Current Daily
Status
Rural Male
15-19 47 33 56 90 65 55 91 131 79 59 93 150
20-24 67 49 72 103 62 52 79 117 62 47 80 129
25-29 32 23 44 77 32 26 56 92 23 16 42 88
15-29 48 35 58 90 51 43 73 111 52 39 69 120
Rural Female
15-19 33 19 51 83 31 32 91 128 67 36 72 126
20-24 45 28 59 82 49 35 82 121 93 57 92 149
25-29 19 9 35 65 24 16 40 77 52 32 60 107
15-29 32 19 48 76 37 27 68 106 70 42 75 127
Note: Unemployment rates are expressed in persons under usual status, person weeks under CWS and persondays under CDS.
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 515, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 61st Round, July 2004 – June 2005.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.40: Rural Unemployment Rates According to Usual Status (PS) and Usual Status (PS+SS) in States and UTs (2009-10)
(Per thousand persons)
Unemployment Rate
S.No. State/ UT Usual Status (PS) Usual Status (PS+SS)
Male Female Persons Male Female Persons
1. Andhra Pradesh 14 10 13 13 9 12
2. Arunachal Pradesh 15 8 13 15 8 13
3. Assam 36 68 41 34 56 39
4. Bihar 22 20 21 21 13 20
5. Chhattisgarh 9 1 6 9 1 6
6. Delhi 18 0 17 18 0 17
7. Goa 35 99 47 35 99 47
8. Gujarat 9 8 9 8 7 8
9. Haryana 24 23 24 21 11 18
10. Himachal Pradesh 26 19 23 19 12 16
11. Jammu & Kashmir 29 173 44 18 38 25
12. Jharkhand 47 16 42 46 12 39
13. Karnataka 6 5 5 5 4 5
14. Kerala 38 210 90 32 161 75
15. Madhya Pradesh 8 5 7 8 4 7
16. Maharashtra 15 19 16 7 4 6
17. Manipur 42 44 43 38 37 38
18. Meghalaya 3 8 5 3 5 4
19. Mizoram 14 16 15 13 15 13
20. Nagaland 137 255 172 98 119 106
21. Odisha 33 41 35 31 27 30
22. Punjab 29 106 35 28 22 26
23. Rajasthan 8 8 8 6 1 4
24. Sikkim 48 36 44 47 34 43
25. Tamil Nadu 16 24 20 15 15 15
26. Tripura 63 340 112 53 198 92
27. Uttarakhand 30 3 20 26 2 16
28. Uttar Pradesh 17 9 16 12 5 10
29. West Bengal 24 47 27 17 28 19
30. A & N Islands 47 281 103 42 190 80
31. Chandigarh 164 511 247 164 511 247
32. D & N Haveli 51 0 48 51 0 48
33. Daman & Diu 45 24 41 45 23 40
34. Lakshadweep 24 480 130 24 256 97
35. Puducherry 41 13 31 41 13 30
All India 19 24 21 16 16 16
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India,
66th Round, July 2009 – June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.41: Rural Unemployment Rates According to Current Weekly Status & Current Daily Status
in States and UTs (July 2009 – June 2010)
Unemployment Rate
S.No. State/ UT Current Weekly Status * Current Daily Status **
Male Female Persons Male Female Persons
1. Andhra Pradesh 35 37 36 73 78 75
2. Arunachal Pradesh 15 17 15 13 11 12
3. Assam 40 72 46 56 119 66
4. Bihar 28 44 30 54 59 54
5. Chhattisgarh 31 13 24 40 18 32
6. Delhi 18 0 17 68 0 65
7. Goa 35 99 47 42 102 53
8. Gujarat 29 36 32 57 68 60
9. Haryana 46 24 40 67 37 61
10. Himachal Pradesh 38 26 33 49 33 43
11. Jammu & Kashmir 28 55 36 36 93 48
12. Jharkhand 52 12 44 81 28 72
13. Karnataka 16 17 17 39 41 40
14. Kerala 47 199 95 129 274 173
15. Madhya Pradesh 25 26 25 64 74 67
16. Maharashtra 22 31 26 55 88 67
17. Manipur 39 40 39 40 44 41
18. Meghalaya 3 7 5 8 10 9
19. Mizoram 14 16 15 18 16 17
20. Nagaland 117 161 133 130 227 159
21. Odisha 54 53 54 82 78 81
22. Punjab 42 25 37 65 51 62
23. Rajasthan 22 14 19 35 22 31
24. Sikkim 47 38 44 50 41 47
25. Tamil Nadu 22 38 29 116 179 141
26. Tripura 60 265 103 99 312 141
27. Uttaranchal 52 2 31 66 4 45
28. Uttar Pradesh 35 15 31 61 28 56
29. West Bengal 28 52 32 70 80 72
30. A & N Islands 58 272 112 63 290 119
31. Chandigarh 164 511 247 165 508 248
32. D & N Haveli 51 0 48 51 0 48
33. Daman & Diu 45 24 41 44 22 40
34. Lakshadweep 25 429 130 97 480 192
35. Puducherry 105 56 87 237 239 237
All India 32 37 33 64 80 68
*: Per thousand person weeks **: Per thousand persondays.
Source: GOI, NSSO, Report No. 537, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66
th Round, July 2009 – June 2010.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.42: Usual Status (Adjusted) Unemployment Rates Among the Rural Youth
Rural to Urban 1053352 522916 530436 26.7 25.9 27.5
Urban to Rural 4490480 2201882 2288598 2.6 2.6 2.5
Urban to Urban 435790 224103 211687
Unclassified
International migrants 740867 386461 354406 100.0 100.0 100.0
Total 392807 188518 204289 53.0 48.8 57.6
Total rural areas 348060 197943 150117 47.0 51.2 42.4
Total urban areas
* Duration 0-9 years. Source: GOI, Census of India 2001, Table D-2.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
F. WAGES AND INDEBTEDNESS
Table 2.55: Distribution of Indebted Rural Households by Purpose (2004-05)
(%)
S.No. Purpose of debt Households
With Cultivated Land
Without Cultivated Land
All Households
1. Household Consumption 23.5 34.5 29.4
2. Marriages & Other Ceremonial Expenses 22.1 21.1 21.6
3. Purchase of land and construction of building
16.6 19.9 18.4
4. Productive purposes 27.2 17.5 22.0
5. Repayment of debt 3.1 2.5 2.8
6. Other purposes 7.5 4.5 5.8
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: GOI, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Report on Indebtedness among Rural Labour Households, 2004-05.
Table 2.56: Distribution of Indebted Rural Labour Households by Source of Debt
(2004-05)
(%)
S. No. Source of debt Households
With
cultivated
land
Without
cultivated
land
All
1 Government 3.63 2.78 3.17
2 Cooperative Societies 13.51 5.67 9.27
3 Banks 21.63 12.10 16.47
4 Employers 3.86 6.61 5.35
5 Moneylenders 36.96 50.42 44.24
6 Shop-keepers 6.06 6.06 6.06
7 Relatives/Friends 12.55 12.97 12.78
8 Other Sources 1.80 3.39 2.66
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
Source: GOI, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Report on Indebtedness among Rural Labour Households, 2004-05.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.57: Estimated Number of Rural Households, Total and Indebted Farmer Households in States– 2003
State Estimated Number of
Rural Households
('00)
Estimated Number of
Farmer Households('00)
Estimated Number of Indebted
Farmer Households ('00)
% of Farmer
Households Indebted
Average amount of outstanding
loan per Farmer Household (Rs.)
Andhra Pradesh 142512 60339 49493 82 23965
Arunachal Pradesh 15412 1227 72 5.9 493
Assam 41525 25040 4536 18.1 813
Bihar 116853 70804 23383 33 4476
Chhattisgarh 36316 27598 11092 40.2 4122
Gujarat 63015 37845 19644 51.9 15526
Haryana 31474 19445 10330 53.1 26007
Himachal Pradesh 11928 9061 3030 33.4 9618
Jammu & Kashmir 10418 9432 3003 31.8 1903
Jharkhand 36930 28238 5893 20.9 2205
Karnataka 69906 40413 24897 61.6 18135
Kerala 49942 21946 14126 64.4 33907
Madhya Pradesh 93898 63206 32110 50.8 14218
Maharashtra 118177 65817 36098 54.8 16973
Manipur 2685 2146 533 24.8 2269
Meghalaya 3401 2543 103 4.1 72
Mizoram 942 780 184 23.6 1876
Nagaland 973 805 294 36.5 1030
Odisha 66199 42341 20250 47.8 5871
Punjab 29847 18442 12069 65.4 41576
Rajasthan 70172 53080 27828 52.4 18372
Sikkim 812 531 174 38.8 2053
Tamil Nadu 110182 38880 28954 74.5 23963
Tripura 5977 2333 1148 49.2 2977
Uttar Pradesh 221499 171575 69199 40.3 7425
Uttaranchal 11959 8962 644 7.2 1108
West Bengal 121667 69226 34696 50.1 5237
UTs 2325 732 372 50.8 10931
All India 1478988 893504 434242 48.6 12585
Source: GOI, NSSO, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers: Indebtedness of Farmer Households, National Sample Survey 59th Round (January-December 2003), Report No. 498(59/33/1).
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.58: Distribution of Indebted Farmers as per Size of Land Possessed in Selected States
(%)
Source: GOI, NSSO, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers: Indebtedness of Farmer Households, National Sample Survey 59th Round (January-December 2003), Report No. 498(59/33/1).
State Marginal Farmer
Households Indebted
Small Farmer Households
Indebted
Semi-Medium Farmer
Households Indebted
Medium Farmer Households
Indebted
Large Farmer
Households Indebted
(upto 1.0
ha of land) (1.01 to 2.00 ha)
(2.01 to 4.00 ha)
(4.01 to 10.00 ha)
(>10.00 ha)
1. Uttar Pradesh 71.3 17.4 7.8 3.4 0.3
2. Maharashtra 36.0 26.2 23.3 12.2 2.4
3. Madhya Pradesh 33.0 27.1 23.1 13.0 3.9
4. Rajasthan 43.9 19.8 17.8 14.1 4.5
5. Karnataka 50.7 22.8 15.9 9.3 1.2
6. Andhra Pradesh 55.7 21.8 15.1 6.6 0.7
7. Bihar 86.9 9.2 2.8 0.7 0.6
8. West Bengal 88.7 8.5 2.4 0.4 0.0
9. Punjab 53.3 15.8 17.0 11.8 2.2
10. Odisha 70.3 20.6 7.3 1.7 0.0
All India 61.0 18.9 12.5 6.4 1.2
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.59: Incidence of Indebtedness Among Rural Labour Households (2004-05)
(%)
SL.
NO.
STATES/
UNION TERRITORIES
PERCENTAGE OF INDEBTED HOUSEHOLDS AMONG ALL CLASSES OF
HOUSEHOLDS SCHEDULED CASTES
HOUSEHOLDS SCHEDULED TRIBES
HOUSEHOLDS OTHER BACKWARD
CLASSES HOUSEHOLDS 1999-
2000 2004-05 1999-
2000 2004-05 1999-
2000 2004-05 1999-
2000 2004-05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Major States
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Gujarat
Haryana
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
37.30
37.74
16.70
35.70
41.00
19.60
42.90
16.00
22.30
17.00
39.70
26.90
19.20
18.20
34.00
66.60
59.30
34.60
56.00
51.10
35.40
64.30
34.20
42.00
29.30
46.90
38.80
53.00
42.90
61.50
13.10
41.00
38.00
36.00
53.90
18.70
52.90
15.80
17.10
23.30
71.40
62.90
27.00
60.20
41.00
59.50
81.90
-
29.70
62.60
38.20
33.30
17.10
44.80
44.10
23.90
44.20
20.60
22.00
15.90
40.10
20.90
19.10
20.20
27.60
-
23.60
8.30
16.60
29.00
12.50
-
-
-
-
31.30
8.90
38.10
34.90
46.90
100.00
100.00
-
-
13.90
65.70
58.50
37.24
62.95
50.70
30.20
67.20
43.40
36.00
35.70
53.00
37.20
55.00
42.60
62.11
-
48.50
82.60
40.20
55.50
16.80
100.00
-
-
-
73.20
57.00
37.80
-
66.90
-
-
-
-
55.50
43.60
40.50
21.80
32.90
-
19.70
21.10
14.90
23.50
12.00
52.70
40.40
38.90
23.10
27.70
-
13.10
-
-
100.00
15.40
-
-
4.30
3.40
5.40
13.00
-
1.80
-
76.00
80.40
-
16.80
48.10
77.70
65.00
25.50
60.10
-
44.50
50.40
31.92
31.30
20.60
14.30
46.42
30.10
14.00
39.50
38.50
32.41
-
43.50
-
15.70
-
16.92
17.10
23.30
74.80
70.90
23.53
100.00
-
67.90
100.00
-
41.20
-
36.00
30.20
13.70
29.30
41.50
15.00
43.30
15.00
21.10
21.30
33.00
16.10
19.30
17.00
27.10
-
19.40
-
19.70
27.80
9.40
31.90
-
-
-
28.00
9.40
39.20
-
48.60
100.00
64.70
-
100.00
22.60
63.90
67.50
33.40
50.70
55.20
40.60
62.34
28.85
45.74
33.70
31.10
31.20
52.10
43.70
54.90
-
43.00
4.30
42.00
35.40
23.60
56.60
-
-
-
75.90
60.00
21.70
-
-
31.70
25.10
-
-
71.40
Other States/UTs Arunachal Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Sikkim
Tripura
Uttarakhand
A & N Islands
Chandigarh
D & N Haveli
Daman & Diu
Delhi
Lakshadweep
Puducherry
-
18.40
9.40
19.80
36.40
11.70
7.00
-
4.30
3.10
20.00
13.50
32.30
11.70
37.20
80.30
73.20
-
30.50
19.80
ALL-INDIA 25.00 47.30 25.30 48.04 22.90 39.39 22.60 46.67 Source: GOI, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Report on Indebtedness among Rural Labour Households, 2004-05.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.60: Extent of Indebtedness Among Rural Labour Households
Source: GOI, NSSO, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66th Round (July 2009 – June 2010).
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.66: Average Wage / Salary Earnings Per Day Received by Casual Labour of Age 15-59 Years Engaged in Public Works Other than MGNREGA Public Works
(2009-10) (Rural) (Rs.)
S.No. State/ UT Male Female Person
1. Andhra Pradesh 91.28 85.44 88.06
2. Arunachal Pradesh 95.00 85.71 94.85
3. Assam 95.47 85.71 95.42
4. Bihar 103.32 102.33 103.30
5. Chhattisgarh 88.89 82.57 86.03
6. Delhi -- -- --
7. Goa -- -- --
8. Gujarat 90.51 87.23 88.02
9. Haryana 104.84 110.40 107.40
10. Himachal Pradesh 114.62 113.82 114.41
11. Jammu & Kashmir 106.18 0.00 106.18
12. Jharkhand 119.28 84.72 112.35
13. Karnataka -- -- --
14. Kerala 125.44 125.47 125.47
15. Madhya Pradesh 80.88 70.54 73.93
16. Maharashtra 94.98 100.00 98.33
17. Manipur 97.16 84.27 89.97
18. Meghalaya 84.97 73.38 81.47
19. Mizoram 118.83 107.34 115.76
20. Nagaland 124.90 119.18 121.03
21. Odisha 83.42 0.00 83.42
22. Punjab 153.97 102.00 152.39
23. Rajasthan 104.87 92.57 97.38
24. Sikkim 107.80 99.13 104.36
25. Tamil Nadu 74.52 77.84 77.45
26. Tripura 99.54 100.76 99.98
27. Uttarakhand 97.98 100.00 98.08
28. Uttar Pradesh 103.73 100.00 103.57
29. West Bengal 88.61 82.81 87.00
30. A & N Islands 150.00 -- 150.00
31. Chandigarh -- -- --
32. D & N Haveli -- -- --
33. Daman & Diu -- -- --
34. Lakshadweep -- -- --
35. Puducherry -- 80.00 80.00
All India 98.33 86.11 93.11
Source: GOI, NSSO, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66th Round (July 2009 – June 2010).
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.67: Average Wage / Salary Earnings Per Day Received by Casual Labour of Age 15-59 Years Engaged in Works Other than Public Works
(2009-10) (Rural) (Rs.)
S.No. State/ UT Male Female Person
1. Andhra Pradesh 115.41 75.71 98.47
2. Arunachal Pradesh 174.42 158.47 169.39
3. Assam 94.38 74.87 90.10
4. Bihar 81.03 65.81 79.41
5. Chhattisgarh 70.83 65.49 68.84
6. Delhi 195.23 200.00 195.96
7. Goa 119.64 107.43 116.65
8. Gujarat 87.31 70.99 83.25
9. Haryana 146.08 99.12 139.58
10. Himachal Pradesh 141.44 110.23 139.56
11. Jammu & Kashmir 157.46 206.54 158.26
12. Jharkhand 103.61 82.17 101.15
13. Karnataka 96.91 62.77 84.50
14. Kerala 226.60 119.31 206.52
15. Madhya Pradesh 74.46 58.13 69.02
16. Maharashtra 86.01 58.22 75.19
17. Manipur 105.26 137.53 109.53
18. Meghalaya 121.24 78.80 110.02
19. Mizoram 153.41 96.87 141.76
20. Nagaland 156.70 59.68 141.44
21. Odisha 81.00 59.06 75.62
22. Punjab 133.46 91.80 130.43
23. Rajasthan 132.29 94.31 125.65
24. Sikkim 125.33 84.24 117.37
25. Tamil Nadu 132.14 72.62 110.76
26. Tripura 107.55 83.63 104.95
27. Uttarakhand 122.10 96.70 118.71
28. Uttar Pradesh 97.04 69.21 94.31
29. West Bengal 87.76 65.94 85.33
30. A & N Islands 145.71 111.60 141.78
31. Chandigarh 193.38 -- 193.38
32. D & N Haveli 117.25 96.18 113.69
33. Daman & Diu 92.63 83.00 89.57
34. Lakshadweep 235.67 139.58 227.12
35. Puducherry 158.16 73.87 129.58
All India 101.53 68.94 93.06
Source: GOI, NSSO, Employment & Unemployment Situation in India, 66th Round (July 2009 – June 2010).
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
G. CONSUMPTION AND POVERTY
Table 2.68: Inequality in Regard to Per Capita Consumer Expenditure (MPCE) – Rural (Gini coefficient)
States 1972-73 1977-78 1983 1987-88 1993-94 1999-00 2004-05
Source: GOI, NSSO, Household Consumer Expenditure in India 2009 - 2010, 66
th Round, December 2011, Report No. 538.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.72: Average Monthly Consumer Expenditure Per Person on Food and Non-Food Items - Rural
(July 2009 – June 2010)
(PCPM)
S.No. State Consumer Expenditure (Rs.)
Food Non-Food Total
1. Andhra Pradesh 716.52 517.24 1233.76
2. Assam 646.38 356.91 1003.28
3. Bihar 504.81 275.35 780.15
4. Chhattisgarh 456.04 327.53 783.57
5. Gujarat 640.10 469.66 1109.76
6. Haryana 815.20 694.71 1509.91
7. Jharkhand 502.81 322.34 855.15
8. Karnataka 576.61 443.79 1020.40
9. Kerala 843.00 992.22 1835.22
10. Madhya Pradesh 503.58 399.24 902.82
11. Maharashtra 622.62 530.17 1152.79
12. Odisha 506.75 311.72 818.47
13. Punjab 795.01 853.91 1648.92
14. Rajasthan 646.55 532.86 1179.40
15. Tamil Nadu 634.52 525.17 1159.69
16. Uttar Pradesh 520.82 378.28 899.10
17. West Bengal 604.20 348.12 952.32
18. All – India 600.36 453.29 1053.64
PCPM: Per Capita Per Month.
Source: GOI, NSSO, Level and Pattern of Consumer Expenditure in India 2009 - 2010, 66
th Round, December 2010, Report No. 538.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.73: Average Consumer Expenditure Per Person on Cereals and Food and Their Percentage Shares in Total Consumer Expenditure in 2009-10 - Major States-Rural
S.No. State Monthly PCE on cereals (Rs.)
Monthly PCE on food
(Rs.)
Share of cereals in total exp
(%)
Share of food in total exp
(%)
1 Andhra Pradesh 168.36 716.52 13.65 58.08
2 Assam 207.31 646.38 20.66 64.43
3 Bihar 166.21 504.81 21.30 64.71
4 Chhattisgarh 120.48 456.04 15.38 58.20
5 Gujarat 118.33 640.10 10.66 57.68
6 Haryana 110.52 815.20 7.32 53.99
7 Jharkhand 158.13 502.81 19.16 60.94
8 Karnataka 125.63 576.61 12.31 56.51
9 Kerala 146.42 843.00 7.98 45.93
10 Madhya Pradesh 122.38 503.58 13.56 55.78
11 Maharashtra 129.79 622.62 11.26 54.01
12 Odisha 152.58 506.75 18.64 61.91
13 Punjab 113.96 795.01 6.91 48.21
14 Rajasthan 141.37 646.55 11.99 54.82
15 Tamil Nadu 104.44 634.52 9.01 54.71
16 Uttar Pradesh 136.91 520.82 15.23 57.93
17. West Bengal 174.32 604.20 18.30 63.45
All India 144.44 600.36 13.71 56.98
Source: GOI, NSSO, Household Consumer Expenditure in India, 66
th Round, July 2009-June 2010, Report No.538.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
2.74: Monthly Average Quantity of Consumption of Different Cereals Per Person-States / UTs (2009-10)
(Rural)
S.No. State/ UTs per capita consumption of cereals (Kg./month)
*includes Jharkhand #includes Chhattisgarh ^ includes Uttarakhand
Source: GOI, NSSO, Household Consumer Expenditure in India, 66
th Round, July 2009-June 2010, Report No.538.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.77: Consumption of Different Groups of Items Per Person for a Period of 30 days in Different NSS Rounds
All-India Rural
Item group
Average expenditure per person at current prices (Rs. / month)
43rd round
(1987-88) 50
th round
(1993-94) 61
st round
(2004-05) 66
th round
(2009-10)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Cereals 41.33 68.13 100.65 145.09
gram 0.38 0.54 0.73 1.48
Cereal substitutes 0.21 0.28 0.39 0.66
Pulses & products 6.27 10.72 17.18 34.23
Milk & products 13.63 26.72 47.31 80.16
Edible oil 7.88 12.43 25.72 34.15
Egg, fish & meat 5.11 9.37 18.60 32.26
Vegetables 8.23 17.01 34.07 57.20
Fruits & nuts 2.57 4.89 10.42 14.88
Sugar 4.51 8.57 13.25 22.63
Salt & spices 4.52 7.43 13.90 22.33
Beverages, etc. 6.18 11.69 25.37 52.03
Food total 100.82 177.77 307.60 497.09
Pan, tobacco & intoxicants 5.03 8.97 15.03 20.60
Fuel & light 11.77 20.69 56.84 87.79
Clothing 10.52 15.12 25.33 45.51
Footwear 1.55 2.48 4.24 9.25
Misc. goods & services* 22.78 48.70 130.52 223.06
Durable goods 5.64 7.67 19.23 44.42
Non-food total 57.28 103.64 251.19 430.62
Total expenditure (Rs.) 158.10 281.40 558.78 927.70
Price deflator @ MPCE (Rural): base 1987-88
100
158.10
176
159.89
319
175.17
494
187.79
*includes education, medical care, rents and taxes. @ derived from CPI for Agricultural Labourers with base 1986-87=100 based on URP data. Source: GOI, NSSO, Household Consumer Expenditure in India, 66
th Round, July 2009-June 2010, Report No.538.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.78: Lorenz Ratio of Distribution of MPCE for State/UTs and All-India (2009-10)-Rural
Lorenz ratio of distribution of persons by
State/UT MPCE (URP) MPCE (MRP) MPCE (MMRP)
Andhra Pradesh 0.278 0.269 0.261
Arunachal Pradesh 0.333 0.293 0.313
Assam 0.244 0.219 0.219
Bihar 0.225 0.215 0.206
Chhattisgarh 0.276 0.234 0.234
Delhi 0.253 0.247 0.271
Goa 0.215 0.220 0.195
Gujarat 0.254 0.252 0.236
Haryana 0.301 0.277 0.272
Himachal Pradesh 0.306 0.282 0.262
Jammu & Kashmir 0.234 0.218 0.216
Jharkhand 0.240 0.212 0.224
Karnataka 0.234 0.232 0.241
Kerala 0.417 0.350 0.318
Madhya Pradesh 0.292 0.276 0.277
Maharashtra 0.268 0.244 0.232
Manipur 0.173 0.159 0.158
Meghalaya 0.201 0.170 0.178
Mizoram 0.237 0.195 0.198
Nagaland 0.186 0.183 0.172
Odisha 0.261 0.248 0.249
Punjab 0.289 0.285 0.284
Rajasthan 0.225 0.213 0.242
Sikkim 0.275 0.260 0.256
Tamil Nadu 0.264 0.256 0.255
Tripura 0.204 0.197 0.206
Uttar Pradesh 0.263 0.231 0.229
Uttarkhand 0.356 0.438 0.421
West Bengal 0.238 0.220 0.221
A & N Islands 0.244 0.254 0.246
Chandigarh 0.187 0.343 0.193
Dadra & N. Haveli 0.205 0.218 0.220
Daman & Diu 0.304 0.301 0.239
Lakshadweep 0.327 0.322 0.237
Puducherry 0.308 0.252 0.212
All India 0.291 0.276 0.270
MPCE: Monthly Per Capita Expenditure. URP: Uniform Recall Period; MRP: Mixed Recall Period; MMRP: Modified Mixed Reference Period. Source: GOI, NSSO, Household Consumer Expenditure in India, 66
Note: 1. PGI and SPG are computed from the NSS consumption expenditure distribution of the respective years and the implicit national poverty lines as per the Expert Group.
2. Lorenz ratios are estimated from the NSS consumption expenditure distribution of the respective years.
Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Ninth Five Year Plan 1997 -2002, Volume – I. Economic and Political Weekly, February, 10, 2007.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.83: Estimates of Rural Poverty and Inequality Indices (URP)
Note: PL (1983): Poverty line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa are used to estimate poverty ratio of Goa; PL (1993-94) Poverty line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli are used to estimate poverty ratio of Dadra and Nagar Haveli ; PL (1999-2000) Poverty line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa are used to estimate poverty ratio of Goa. Poverty line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli are used to estimate poverty ratio of Dadra & Nagar Haveli.
* The poverty line (implicit) at all-India level is worked out from the expenditure class-wise distribution of persons (based on URP-consumption, that is, consumption data collected from 30 – day recall period for all items) and the poverty ratio at all-India level. The poverty ratio at all-India is obtained as the weighted average of the state-wise poverty ratio.
Sources : 1) GOI, Planning Commission, Report of the Expert Group on Estimation of Proportion and Number of Poor, 1993. 2) GOI, Planning Commission, National Human Development Report, 2001. 3) GOI, Planning Commission, Press Release, March 21, 2007.
4) GOI, Planning Commission, The Hindu, March 20, 2012.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.85: Population Below Poverty Line by States – 1993-94
All- India 2440.31 37.27 205.84 763.37 32.36 281.35 3203.68 35.97
Note: 1. Poverty ratio of Assam is used for Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Tripura. 2. Poverty ratio of Tamil Nadu is used for Puducherry and Andaman & Nicobar Island. 3. Poverty ratio of Kerala is used for Lakshadweep. 4. Poverty ratio of Goa is used for Daman & Diu. 5. Urban poverty ratio of Punjab is used for both rural and urban poverty of Chandigarh. 6. Poverty line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli are used to estimate poverty ratio of
Dadra & Nagar Haveli.; PL of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution Goa are used to estimate poverty ratio of Goa. 7. Poverty line of Himachal Pradesh and expenditure distribution of Jammu & Kashmir are used to estimate poverty ratio of
Jammu & Kashmir. 8. Poverty line is in Rupees per capita per month; 1 Lakh is equivalent to 100,000. Source: GOI, Planning Commission, National Human Development Report, 2001.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.86: Population Below Poverty Line by States – 1999-2000 (30-Day Recall period)
All India 1932.43 27.09 327.56 670.07 23.62 454.11 2602.50 26.10
1. Poverty ratio of Assam is used for Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Tripura. 2. Poverty ratio of Tamil Nadu is used for Puducherry and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. 3. Poverty ratio of Kerala is used for Lakshadweep. Poverty ratio of Goa is used for Daman & Diu. 4. Poverty line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa are used to estimate poverty ratio of Goa. 5. Urban poverty ratio of Punjab is used for both rural and urban poverty of Chandigarh. 6. Poverty line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli are used to estimate poverty ratio of
Dadra & Nagar Haveli; Poverty Ratio of Himachal Pradesh is used to Jammu & Kashmir 7. Urban Poverty Ratio of Rajasthan may be treated as tentative 8. Poverty Line is in Rupees per capita per month; 1 lakh is equivalent to 100,000 Source: GOI, Planning Commission, National Human Development Report, 2001.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.87: Population Below Poverty Line by States – 2004-05 (Based on URP-Consumption)
URP consumption = Uniform Recall Period consumption in which the consumer expenditure data for all the items are collected from 30-day recall period. Notes: 1. Poverty Ratio of Assam is used for Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Tripura. 2. Poverty Line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa is used to estimate poverty ratio of Goa. 3. Poverty Ratio of Tamil Nadu is used for Puducherry and A & N Island. 4. Urban Poverty Ratio of Punjab is used for both rural and urban poverty of Chandigarh. 5. Poverty Line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli are used to estimate poverty ratio of Dadra & Nagar Haveli. 6. Poverty Ratio of Goa is used for Daman & Diu. 7. Poverty Ratio of Kerala is used for Lakshadweep. Source: GOI, Planning Commission, Press Release, March 21, 2007.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.88: State-wise Number and Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line (Base on Mixed Recall Period Consumption) in India (2004-2005)
Note: 1. Poverty Ratio of Assam is used for Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Tripura. 2. Poverty Line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa is used to estimate poverty ratio of Goa. 3. Poverty Ratio of Tamil Nadu is used for Puducherry and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. 4. Urban Poverty Ratio of Punjab is used for both rural and urban poverty of Chandigarh. 5. Poverty Line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli are used to estimate poverty ratio of Dadra & Nagar Haveli. 6. Poverty Ratio of Goa is used for Daman & Diu. 7. Poverty Ratio of Kerala is used for Lakshadweep. 8. MRP Consumption= mixed recall period consumption in which the consumer expenditure data for five non-food items, namely, clothing, footwear, durable goods, education and institutional medical expenses are collected from 365-day recall period and the consumption data for the remaining items are collected from 30-day recall period. Source: GOI, Planning Commission.
Rural Development Statistics
Socio-Economic Characteristics
Table 2.89: State-wise Number and Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line (Tendulkar Methodology) in India (2004-2005)