Top Banner
soran university school of engineering department of petroleum engineering scientific debate course 2 nd semester Terminal seminar students name : Shivan farok Meelad Abdulla
124
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: scientific debate presentation report.docx

soran university school of engineering

department of petroleum engineering

scientific debate course

2nd semester

Terminal seminar

students name:

Shivan farok

Meelad Abdulla

Buya sabri

Huner salar

supervisor name:

Dr. mohammed amin

Page 2: scientific debate presentation report.docx

The exploration & producing of petroleum in Norway

Contents:

1 .History of petroleum industry in Norway.

2 .Framework and organization involved in the petroleum industry.

3 .Petroleum resources in Norway.

4 .Exploration activities and researches .

5.Development and production operations.

6 .Onshore facilities.

7 .Environmental considerations in the petroleum activities .

Key words:

Norway , Europe , north sea , oil , gas , petroleum

onshore , reservoir , economic development , exploration drilling , scientific , finance , fields , exporting

global markets , oil companies , production units pipelines , environment , pollution , industry risks

Page 3: scientific debate presentation report.docx

1 . History of petroleum industry in Norway

At the end of the 1950s, few people imagined that the Norwegian

continental shelf concealed wealth consisting of vast volumes

of oil and gas. However, the gas discovery in Groningen in the

Netherlands in 1959 led to newfound optimism surrounding the

North Sea’s petroleum potential.

In October 1962, Philips Petroleum sent a letter to the

Norwegian authorities requesting permission to conduct exploration

in the North Sea. The company wanted a licence for the parts

of the North Sea situated on the Norwegian continental shelf. The

Page 4: scientific debate presentation report.docx

offer was USD 160 000 per month, and was regarded as an attempt

to acquire exclusive rights. For the authorities, it was out of the

question to surrender the entire shelf to one company. If the areas

were to be opened for exploration, more than one company was

needed.

In May 1963, the government proclaimed sovereignty over the

Norwegian continental shelf. A new act stipulated that the State

was the landowner, and that only the King (government) could

grant licences for exploration and production. But even though

Norway had proclaimed sovereignty over vast ocean areas, some

important clarifications were still needed regarding delineation

Page 5: scientific debate presentation report.docx

of the continental shelf, primarily in relation to Denmark and the

UK. Agreements regarding delineation of the continental shelf on

the basis of the median line principle were signed in March 1965,

and the first licensing round was announced on 13. April 1965.

22 production licences were awarded, covering 78 blocks. The first

exploration well was drilled during the summer of 1966, but turned

out to be dry.

The Norwegian oil adventure begun with the discovery of

Ekofisk in 1969. Production from the field started on 15. June 1971,

and several large discoveries were made during the following

years. In the 1970s, the exploration activity was concentrated on

Page 6: scientific debate presentation report.docx

the North Sea, but the shelf was also gradually opened northwards.

Only a limited number of blocks were announced for each

licensing round, and the most promising areas were explored

first. This led to world-class discoveries, and production from the

Norwegian continental shelf has since been dominated by these

large fields, which were given names such as Ekofisk, Statfjord, Oseberg,

Gullfaks and Troll. These fields have been, and still are, very

important for the development of petroleum activities in Norway.

The development of these large fields has also led to the establishment

of infrastructure, enabling tie-in of a number of other fields.

Production from several of the major fields is now in declinine, and

Page 7: scientific debate presentation report.docx

the trend is now development of and production from new, smaller

fields. Therefore, Norwegian petroleum production is currently

divided among a larger number of fields than before.

In the beginning, the authorities chose to start with a model

where foreign companies operated the petroleum activities. This

meant that foreign companies initially dominated the exploration

activities and developed the first oil and gas fields. The Norwegian

involvement increased with the entry of Norsk Hydro, and in 1972,

Statoil was established with the State as sole owner. A policy was

also established to give the State a mandate for 50 per cent participation

in each production licence. In 1993, this principle was changed

Page 8: scientific debate presentation report.docx

so that an assessment is made in each individual case as to

whether there will be State participation, and whether the ownership

interest will be higher or lower. Another private Norwegian

company, Saga Petroleum, was also established. In 1999, Saga was

acquired by Norsk Hydro. Statoil was listed in 2001, some thing that

led to the establishment of Petoro. Petoro took over administration

of the State’s Direct Financial Interest (SDFI), established in 1985,

from Statoil. In 2007, Statoil merged with Norsk Hydro’s oil and gas

division. Today, about 50 Norwegian and foreign companies are

active on the shelf.

Page 9: scientific debate presentation report.docx

2. Framework and organizations involved in the petroleum industry

A predictable and transparent framework is a prerequisite for good

decisions to be made by the oil companies. The organization of

the activities, as well as how roles and responsibilities are defined,

must ensure adequate attention to all important considerations

Page 10: scientific debate presentation report.docx

and make sure that the value created benefits society as a whole.

This includes consideration for the external environment, health,

working environment and safety1. Everyone benefits from a framework

that provides the petroleum industry with incentives to meet

the State’s objectives, while also fulfilling their own goals of maximizing

company profit.

The Petroleum Act (Act of 29 November 1996 No. 72 relating to

petroleum activities) contains the general legal basis for the licensing

system governing Norwegian petroleum activities. According

to the Act and appurtenant regulations to the Act (Regulations of

27 June 1997 No. 653), licenses can be awarded for exploration,

Page 11: scientific debate presentation report.docx

production and transport of petroleum. The Petroleum Act confirms

that the property right to the petroleum deposits on the Norwegian

continental shelf is vested in the State. Official approvals and permits

are necessary in all phases of the petroleum activities, from the

award of exploration and production licenses, in connection with

acquisition of seismic data and exploration drilling2, to plans for

development and operation3, and plans for field cessation4.

prepared guidelines on how to formulate the application, and these

are available on the NPD’s website.

Based on the applications submitted, the Ministry of Petroleum

and Energy (MPE) awards production licenses to a group of companies.

Relevant, objective, nondiscriminatory

Page 12: scientific debate presentation report.docx

and announced criteria

form the basis for these awards. The Ministry designates an operator

for the joint venture which will be responsible for the operational

activities authorized by the license. The licensee group also functions

as an internal control system in the production license, where

each licensee’s role is to monitor the work done by the operator.

-Impact assessments and opening of new acreage:

Before a production license is awarded for exploration or production,

the relevant area must be opened for petroleum activities.

In this respect, an impact assessment must be carried out to evaluate

factors such as the economic and social effects, and the environmental

Page 13: scientific debate presentation report.docx

impact the activity could have for other industries and the

adjacent districts.

-The production license:

The production license regulates the rights and obligations of the

companies visàvis

the Norwegian State. The document supplements

the requirements in the Petroleum Act and stipulates detailed

terms and conditions. It grants companies exclusive rights to

surveys, exploration drilling and production of petroleum within the

geographical area covered by the license. The licensees become the

owners of the petroleum that is produced.

- Announcement:

Page 14: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Production licenses are normally awarded through licensing rounds.

Each year, the government announces a certain number of blocks

that may be included in applications for production licenses. The

announcement is made in the Official Journal of Norway (Norsk

Lysingsblad), the Official Journal of the European Communities,

and on the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate’s (NPD’s) website .

State organisation of the petroleum activities

The Storting (Norwegian Parliament) sets the framework for the

petroleum activities in Norway, in part by adopting legislation.

Major development projects and issues of fundamental importance

must be deliberated in the Storting. The Storting also supervises the

Government and public administration.

Page 15: scientific debate presentation report.docx

The Government exercises executive authority over the petroleum

policy, and answers to the Starting. To carry out its policies.

More on the State organization

of the petroleum activities:

THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR

The Ministry of Labour has overall responsibility for regulating and

supervising the working environment, as well as safety and emergency

preparedness in connection with the petroleum activities.

The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway

The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA) is responsible for

technical and operational safety, including emergency preparedness

Page 16: scientific debate presentation report.docx

and working environment in the petroleum activities.

THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE

The Ministry of Finance has overall responsibility for ensuring that

the State collects taxes and fees (corporate tax, special tax, CO2 tax

and NOx tax) from the petroleum activities.

The Petroleum Tax Office

The Petroleum Tax Office is part of the Norwegian Tax Administration,

which reports to the Ministry of Finance. The primary task of

the Petroleum Tax Office is to ensure correct levying and payment

of taxes and fees adopted by the political authorities.

The Directorate of Customs and Excise

The Directorate of Customs and Excise ensures correct levying and

payment of NOx tax.

Page 17: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Government Pension Fund - Global

The Ministry of Finance is responsible for managing the Government

Pension Fund – Global. Responsibility for the operative

manage ment has been delegated to Norges Bank.

THE MINISTRY OF FISHERIES AND COASTAL AFFAIRS

The Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs is responsible for

ensuring sound emergency preparedness against acute pollution

in Norwegian waters.

The Norwegian Coastal Administration

The Norwegian Coastal Administration is responsible for the State’s

oil spill preparedness.

THE MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT

The Ministry of the Environment has overall responsibility for

Page 18: scientific debate presentation report.docx

managing environmental protection and the external environment

in Norway.

The Climate and Pollution Agency

The responsibilities of the Climate and Pollution Agency include

following up the Pollution Control Act. Another key task is to provide

advice and basic technical materials to the Ministry of the

Environment.

The State’s revenues from the petroleum activities

Norway has a special system for State revenues from the petroleum

activities. The main reason for this system is the extraordinary

returns associated with producing these resources. The petroleum

resources belong to the Norwegian society and the State secures

Page 19: scientific debate presentation report.docx

a large portion of the value created through taxation and direct

ownership through the SDFI.

The petroleum taxation system

The petroleum taxation system is based on the rules for ordinary

corporate taxation, but specified in a separate Petroleum Taxation

Act (Act of 13 June 1975 No. 35 relating to the taxation of subsea

petroleum deposits). Due to the extraordinary profit associated

with recovering the petroleum resources, an additional special tax

is levied on this type of commercial activity. The ordinary tax rate is

the same as on land, 28 per cent, while the special tax rate is 50 per

cent. When the basis for ordinary tax and special tax is calculated,

investments are subject to straight line

Page 20: scientific debate presentation report.docx

depreciation over six years

from the year they are incurred. Deductions are allowed for all relevant

costs, including costs associated with exploration, research and

development, financing, operations and removal

Consolidation between fields is allowed. To shield normal return

from special tax, an extra deduction is allowed in the basis for special

tax, called uplift. This amounts to 30 per cent of the investments

)7.5 per cent per year for four years, from and including the investment

year.(

Companies that are not in a tax position can carry forward

deficits and uplift with interest. These rights follow the participating

interest and can be transferred. Companies can also apply for a

Page 21: scientific debate presentation report.docx

refund of the tax value of exploration expenses in connection with

the tax assessment.

The petroleum taxation system is designed to be neutral, so that

an investment project that is profitable for an investor before tax

will also be profitable after tax. This makes it possible to safeguard

the consideration both for substantial income for society as a whole,

as well as for the fact that companies want to implement profitable

projects.

MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND ENERGY

The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (MPE) has overall responsibility

for managing the petroleum resources on the Norwegian continental

shelf. The Ministry must ensure that the petroleum activities

Page 22: scientific debate presentation report.docx

are carried out in accordance with the guidelines set by the Storting

and the Government. The Ministry also has ownership responsibility

for the Stationed

companies Petoro AS and Gassco AS, and the

partly Stationed

oil company Statoil ASA.

The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate

The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) reports to the Ministry

of Petroleum and Energy. The NPD plays a key role in petroleum

management, and is an important advisory body for the MPE. The

NPD exercises administrative authority in connection with exploration

for and production of petroleum deposits on the Norwegian

continental shelf. This also includes the authority to stipulate regulations

Page 23: scientific debate presentation report.docx

and make decisions under the petroleum activities regulations.

Petoro AS

Petoro AS is a Stateowned

enterprise which handles the State’s

direct financial interest (SDFI), on behalf of the Norwegian State.

Gassco AS

Gassco AS is a Stationed

enterprise responsible for transport

of gas from the Norwegian continental shelf. The company is the

operator of Gassled. Gassco has no ownership interest in Gassled,

but carries out its operatorship in a neutral, efficient manner in

relation to both owners and users.

Statoil ASA

Statoil ASA is an international company with activities in 35

Page 24: scientific debate presentation report.docx

countries. The company is listed on the Oslo and New York stock

3. Petroleum resources in Norway

What is petroleum?

Oil and gas are formed over several million years through decomposition

and conversion of organic matter deposited in ocean areas.

Most of the oil and gas deposits on the Norwegian continental

shelf originate from a thick layer of black clay that is currently

located several thousand metres under the seabed. The black clay

is a source rock, which means a deposit that contains significant

Page 25: scientific debate presentation report.docx

organic residue. The clay was deposited around 150 million years

ago at the bottom of a sea that covered much of present-day northwestern

Europe. This sea was unique in that the seabed was dead

and stagnant at the same time as the upper water masses were

teeming with life. Large amounts of microscopic phytoplankton was

accumulated in the oxygen-free bottom sediments. Over time, they

were buried deeper, and after a long chemical conversion through

bacterial decomposition and subsequent thermal effects, liquid

hydrocarbons and gas were formed in the source rock.

During oxygen-free decomposition of organic matter, substances

such as kerogen are formed, which in turn creates oil and

Page 26: scientific debate presentation report.docx

gas at increased temperatures and pressures. On the Norwegian

continental shelf, the temperature increases by 25 degrees per

kilometre of depth. After more than one hundred million years of

erosion and depositing, there can be several kilometres of clay and

sand over the source rock. Oil is formed when the kerogen’s temperature

reaches 60 - 120 degrees; at higher temperatures, mainly gas

is formed.

As the oil and gas are formed, they seep out of the source rock

and follow the path of least resistance, determined by pressure

and the rock’s permeability. Because hydrocarbons are lighter than

water, they will migrate upward in porous, water-bearing rocks.

Page 27: scientific debate presentation report.docx

The oil and gas migration takes place over thousands of years, and

can extend over tens of kilometres until it is stopped by denser

layers. Reservoir rocks are porous and always saturated with various

compositions of water, oil and gas. Most of Norway’s petroleum

resources are trapped in reservoir rocks deposited in large deltas

formed by rivers that ran into the sea during the Jurassic Age. The

main reservoirs on e.g. the Gullfaks, Oseberg and Statfjord fields are

in the large Brent delta from the Jurassic Age. Large reserves are

also found in sand deposited on alluvial plains from the Triassic Age

)the Snorre field ,(in shallow seas from the Late Jurassic Age (the

Troll field) and as subsea fans from the Palaeocene Age (the Balder

Page 28: scientific debate presentation report.docx

field). In the southern North Sea, thick layers of chalk, consisting

of microscopic calcareous algae, constitute an important reservoir

rock.

Clay stone and argillaceous sandstone form dense deposits that

affect migration routes from the source rock to the reservoir. They

are also essential for keeping petroleum in place in the reservoir

over an extended period of time. Dense deposits that form a cap

over the reservoir rocks are called cap rocks. In addition, the reservoir

rocks must have a shape that collects the oil in a so-called trap.

When an area contains source rocks, reservoir rocks, cap rocks and

a trap, the preconditions are present for discovering oil and gas.

Page 29: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Resources

Resources is a collective term for recoverable petroleum volumes.

The resources are classified according to their maturity, see Figure

4.2 .The classification includes the following categories: decided

by the licensees or approved by the authorities for development

)re serves ,(volumes dependent on clarification and decisions

)contingent resources (and volumes expected to be discovered in

Page 30: scientific debate presentation report.docx

the future (undiscovered resources). The main categories are thus

reserves, contingent resources and undiscovered resources.

The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate’s base estimates for dis covered

and undiscovered petroleum resources on the Norwegian continental

shelf amount to approx. 13.6 billion standard cubic metres

of oil equivalents (billion Sm3 o.e.). Of this, a total of 6 billion Sm3 o.e.

have been sold and delivered, which corresponds to 44 per cent of

the total resources. The total remaining recoverable resources amount

to 7.6 billion Sm3 o.e. Of this, 5 billion Sm3 o.e. have been discovered,

while the estimate for undiscovered resources is 2.6 billion Sm3 o.e.

The total growth of discovered resources from exploration

Page 31: scientific debate presentation report.docx

activities in 2012 is estimated at 132 million Sm3 o.e. Thirteen new

discoveries were made in 26 exploration wells. Many of the discoveries

have not been evaluated, and the estimates are therefore very

uncertain.

Since production started on the Norwegian continental shelf

in 1971, petroleum has been produced from a total of 88 fields. In

2012 ,production started from the Atla, Gaupe, Islay, Oselvar and

Visund S ّr fields in the North Sea and from the Marulk field in the

Norwegian Sea. Of the fields that were producing at the end of

2012/beginning of 2013, 61 are located in the North Sea, 14 in the

Norwegian Sea and one in the Barents Sea.

Figure 4.1 shows the estimates for recoverable resources on the

Page 32: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Norwegian continental shelf. The volumes are divided according to

the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate’s resource classification and

show total resources; liquid and gas.

Detailed resource accounts as of 31 December 2012 are presented

in Table 4.1 and in tables in Appendix 2.

Reserves

Reserves include remaining recoverable petroleum resources in

deposits for which the authorities have approved PDOs or granted

PDO exemptions, and in deposits the licensees have decided to produce,

but where the authorities are still processing the plan.

In 2012, the reserve growth was 344 million Sm3 o.e. At the same

time, 226 million Sm3 o.e. were sold and delivered. The resource

Page 33: scientific debate presentation report.docx

accounts show an increase of 118 million Sm3 o.e. in remaining

reserves, which is about four per cent.

As regards the authorities’ goal of maturing 800 million Sm3 of

oil to reserves by 2015, 155 million Sm3 of oil were recorded as new

reserves in 2012. During the period from 2005 to 2012, the overall

reserve growth totals 607 million Sm3 of oil.

Contingent resources

Contingent resources include proven petroleum volumes for which

a decision to produce has not yet been made. Contingent resources

in fields, not including resources from possible future measures for

improved recovery (resource category 7A), increased by only 1 million

Sm3 o.e. The reason for the low growth is that decisions have

Page 34: scientific debate presentation report.docx

been made and resources in fields have matured to reserves, and

that some projects on fields are reduced in scope and volume.

The volume of contingent resources in discoveries has

decreased by 25 million Sm3 o.e., to 980 million Sm3 o.e. The

reduction can be explained by factors such as resources maturing

to reserves in the 15/51

Gina Krog, 16/18

Edvard Grieg, 16/19

Ivar Aasen, 24/99

S B ّyla, 25/1116

Svalin, 30/76

Martin Linge

and 6707/101

Aasta Hansteen discoveries.

Page 35: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Undiscovered resources

Undiscovered resources include petroleum volumes that are

assumed to exist, but have not yet been proven through drilling

)resource categories 8 and 9.(

A complete update of the resource estimates on the Norwegian

continental shelf was carried out in 2012. The volume of undiscovered

resources is now estimated at 2 590 million Sm3 o.e., an increase

Page 36: scientific debate presentation report.docx

of 135 million Sm3 o.e. compared with last year’s accounts. This

volume does not include volumes from the new areas in the southeastern

Barents Sea and around Jan Mayen. It is believed that there

are greater deposits of undiscovered oil, and less gas, on the

Norwegian shelf than previously estimated. It is especially the

undiscovered oil resources in the North Sea and Barents Sea that are

believed to be greater than previously estimated, and gas resources

in the North Sea and Barents Sea are adjusted downward. Estimates

for the Norwegian Sea have only been marginally adjusted.

The North Sea

Changes in the accounts show that 151 million Sm3 o.e. have been

Page 37: scientific debate presentation report.docx

sold and delivered from the North Sea over the past year. The growth

of gross reserves was 244 million Sm3 o.e. The increase is partly due

to the approved PDOs for the 16/18

Edvard Grieg, 24/49

S B ّyla,

2/1116

Svalin and 30/76

Martin Linge discoveries, and because

the licensees submitted a PDO for 15/51

Gina Krog and 16/19

Ivar

Aasen. In addition, there has been an increase in reserves for fields

in operation. This led to an increase in the remaining reserves in the

North Sea by 93 million Sm3 o.e. Contingent resources in fields were

reduced by 37 million Sm3 o.e., partly because projects on fields were

Page 38: scientific debate presentation report.docx

decided and contingent resources therefore matured to reserves,

and partly because some projects on fields are reduced in size and

volume. Five new discoveries were made in the North Sea in 2012.

Contingent resources in discoveries were reduced by 48 million

Sm3 o.e. The reason is that resources in the 15/51

Gina Krog, 16/18

Edvard Grieg, 16/16

Ivar Aasen, 24/49

S B ّyla, 2/1116

Svalin and

30/76

Martin Linge discoveries matured to reserves.

The Norwegian Sea

Changes in the accounts for what has been sold and delivered from

Page 39: scientific debate presentation report.docx

the Norwegian Sea in 2012 totalled 69 million Sm3 o.e. The growth

in gross reserves was 100 million Sm3 o.e., partly because the PDO

for 6707/101

Aasta Hansteen was submitted. In addition, gas

re serves in several fields in the Norwegian Sea increased. Remaining

reserves in the Norwegian Sea have therefore increased by 31 million

Sm3 o.e. Contingent resources in fields increased by 13 million

Sm3 o.e., because new projects to improve recovery on fields were

approved. Five new discoveries were made in the Norwegian Sea in

2012 .Still, the estimate for contingent resources in discoveries was

reduced by 47 million Sm3 o.e. compared with last year’s accounts.

This is partly due to resources maturing to reserves for 6707/101

Page 40: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Aasta Hansteen.

The Barents Sea

Changes in the accounts show that 6 million Sm3 o.e. have been

sold and delivered from the Barents Sea in 2012. Increase in gross

reserves was minimal. Remaining reserves are therefore reduced

by 6 million Sm3 o.e. Contingent resources in fields have increased

by 26 million Sm3 o.e., partly because two projects for improved

recovery on the Snhvit field have matured further and increased

in volume. Three new discoveries were made in the Barents Sea

in 2012. Contingent resources in discoveries thus increased by

70 million Sm3 o.e.

Page 41: scientific debate presentation report.docx

4. Exploration activities and researches

Includes prospecting, seismic and drilling activities that take

place before the development of a field is finally decided.

In the past, surface features

Page 42: scientific debate presentation report.docx

such as tar seeps or gas

pockmarks provided initial

clues to the location of

shallow hydrocarbon

deposits. Today, a series of

surveys, starting with broad

geological mapping through

increasingly advanced

methods such as passive

seismic, reflective seismic,

magnetic and gravity surveys give data to sophisticated analysis tools that

identify potential hydrocarbon bearing rock as “prospects.” Chart: Norwegian

Petroleum Directorate (Barents Sea)

5

An offshore well typically costs $30 million, with most falling in the $10-$100

million range. Rig leases are typically $200,000 - $700,000 per day. The

Page 43: scientific debate presentation report.docx

average US onshore well costs about $4 million, as many have much lower

production capacity. Smaller companies exploring marginal onshore fields

may drill a shallow well for as little as $100,000.

This means that oil companies spend much time on analysis models of good

exploration data, and will only drill when models give a good indication of

source rock and probability of finding oil or gas. The first wells in a region are

called wildcats because little may be known about potential dangers, such as

the downhole pressures that will be encountered, and therefore require

particular care and attention to safety equipment.

If a find (strike, penetration) is made, additional reservoir characterization

such as production testing, appraisal wells, etc., are needed to determine the

size and production capacity of the reservoir in order to justify a development

Page 44: scientific debate presentation report.docx

decision.

_Hydrocarbon exploration (or oil and gas exploration) is the search by

petroleum geologists and geophysicists for hydrocarbon deposits beneath the

Earth's surface, such as oil and natural gas. Oil and gas exploration are grouped

under the science of petroleum geology.

_The initial phase in petroleum operations that includes generation of a prospect

or play or both, and drilling of an exploration well. Appraisal, development and

production phases follow successful exploration.

_The exploration process typically occurs in stages, with early stages focusing

on gathering surface data (which is easier to acquire), and later stages focusing

on gathering subsurface data, including drilling data and detailed geophysical

survey data.

Page 45: scientific debate presentation report.docx

_The most important techniques used in exploration geology include:

1 (geochemical sampling methods

2 (geophysical methods

_Geochemical method:

_Geochemistry is the application of chemistry to the study of the earth.

_Traces of hydrocarbons in soil and water are often good indications of the proximiry of a

petroleum trap.

_In an exploratory area, surface samples of waters and soils are taken. These samples are

analyzed in the laboratory with instruments such as gas chromatographs for minure traces

of hydrocarbons.

_Geophysical methods:

_The study of the physics of the Earth, especially its electrical,

Page 46: scientific debate presentation report.docx

gravitational and magnetic fields and propagation of elastic (seismic)

waves within it.

_Geophysics plays a critical role in the petroleum industry because

geophysical data are used by exploration and development personnel to

make predictions about the presence, nature and size of subsurface

hydrocarbon accumulations.

_ The main Geophysical techniques for petroleum exploration are:1- Gravity Surveys2- Magnetic surveys

3 -Seismic surveys

_Gravity Surveys:

Page 47: scientific debate presentation report.docx

_The gravity method measures small variations of the earth’s gravity field caused by

density variations in geological structures. Gravity surveys can be used to map the

extent or depth of sedimentary basins or even individual hydrocarbon prospects.

o The measuring tool is a sophisticated form of spring balance designed to be

responsive over a wide range of values. Fluctuations in the gravity field give rise to

changes in the spring length which are measured (relative to a base station value) at

various stations along the profile of a 2D network.

•If there are denser rocks below (ores) they will give a positive gravity

anomaly.

•If there are less dense rocks (salt/halite) there will be a negative

anomaly.

Page 48: scientific debate presentation report.docx

_Magnetic surveys:

Like the gravity technique this survey is often employed at the beginning of an

exploration venture.

_The study of the Earth's magnetic field, a branch of geophysics that began with the

observation by British scientist William Gilbert (1544 to 1603) that the Earth is a

magnet.

_Variations in the magnetic field can be used to determine the extent of sedimentary

basins and the depth to basement rocks, as well as to differentiate between igneous

Page 49: scientific debate presentation report.docx

rocks and certain sedimentary rocks such as salt.

_High-resolution magnetic surveys can also be used to determine the locations of oil

pipelines and production equipment.

_They are fast, provide a great deal of information for the cost and can provide

information about the distribution of rocks occurring under thin layers of sedimentary

rocks, useful when trying to locate ore bodies

_Aeromagnetic surveys are taken from a moving plane.

_A magnetometer is the instrument used to measure the intensity of the magnetic field

at a particular place.

_The method is airborne (plane or satellite) which permits rapid surveying and mapping

with good areal coverage

Page 50: scientific debate presentation report.docx

_Seismic surveys:

_Seismic surveys involve generating sound waves which propagate through the earth’s

rocks down to reservoir targets.

_The waves are reflected to the surface, where they are registered in receivers, recorded

and stored for processing. The resulting data make up an acoustic image of the

subsurface which is interpreted by geophysicists and geologists.

Page 51: scientific debate presentation report.docx

_It was initially used in petroleum exploration, where an accurate knowledge of the

rock layers is critical to successful exploration. In recent years, the technique is being

used more and more in mineral exploration as the search for deeper ore bodies

continues

_The shock waves travel beneath the surface of the Earth and are reflected back by the

various rock layers. The reflections travel at different speeds depending upon

the type or density of rock layers through which they must pass.

Page 52: scientific debate presentation report.docx

_In seismic surveys, a shock wave is created by the following:

_Compressed-air gun - shoots pulses of air into the water (for exploration

over water(

_Thumper truck - slams heavy plates into the ground (for exploration over

land(

_Explosives - detonated after being drilled into the ground (for exploration

over land) or thrown overboard (for exploration over water)

_Seismic surveying is used in

_exploration for delineating structural and stratigraphic traps

_field appraisal and development for estimating reserves and drawing

up FDPs

_production for reservoir surveillance such as observing the movement

Page 53: scientific debate presentation report.docx

of reservoir fluids in response to production.

5.

Development and production operations

Today, oil and gas is produced in almost every part of the world, from the

small 100 barrels-a-day private wells to the large bore 4,000 barrels-a-day

wells; in shallow 20 meter deep reservoirs to 3,000 meter deep wells in more

than 2,000 meters of water; in $100,000 onshore wells and $10 billion

offshore developments. Despite this range, many parts of the process are

quite similar in principle.

At the left side, we find the wellheads. They feed into production and test

Page 54: scientific debate presentation report.docx

manifolds. In distributed production, this is called the gathering system. The

remainder of the diagram is the actual process, often called the gas oil

separation plant (GOSP). While there are oil- or gas-only installations, more

often the well-stream will consist of a full range of hydrocarbons from gas

)methane, butane, propane, etc ,(.condensates (medium density

hydrocarbons) to crude oil. With this well flow, we also get a variety of

unwanted components, such as water, carbon dioxide, salts, sulfur and

sand. The purpose of the GOSP is to process the well flow into clean,

marketable products: oil, natural gas or condensates. Also included are a

number of utility systems, which are not part of the actual process but

provide energy, water, air or some other utility to the plant.

Page 55: scientific debate presentation report.docx

There are two types of production facilities:

1 -onshore

2 -offshore

1 . (onshore:

Onshore production is economically

viable from a few dozen barrels of oil

a day and upward. Oil and gas is

produced from several million wells

worldwide. In particular, a gas

gathering network can become very

large, with production from thousands

of wells, several hundred

kilometers/miles apart, feeding

through a gathering network into a

processing plant. This picture shows a

well, equipped with a sucker rod pump

Page 56: scientific debate presentation report.docx

)donkey pump (often associated with

onshore oil production. However, as

we shall see later, there are many

other ways of extracting oil from a non

free-flowing well. For the smallest reservoirs, oil is simply collected in a

holding tank and picked up at regular intervals by tanker truck or railcar to be

processed at a refinery.

Onshore wells in oil-rich areas are also high capacity wells producing

thousands of barrels per day, connected to a 1,000,000 barrel or more per

8

day GOSP. Product is sent from the plant by pipeline or tankers. The

production may come from many different license owners, so metering of

individual well-streams into the gathering network are important tasks.

Unconventional plays target very

Page 57: scientific debate presentation report.docx

heavy crude and tar sands that

became economically extractable

with higher prices and new

technology. Heavy crude may

need heating and diluents to be

extracted. Tar sands have lost

their volatile compounds and are

strip-mined or can be extracted

with steam. It must be further

processed to separate bitumen

from the sand. Since about 2007,

drilling technology and fracturing

of the reservoir have allowed

shale gas and liquids to be

produced in increasing volumes.

This allows the US in particular to

reduce dependence on

hydrocarbon imports. Canada,

China, Argentina, Russia, Mexico

Page 58: scientific debate presentation report.docx

and Australia also rank among the

top unconventional plays. These

unconventional reserves may

contain more 2-3 times the

hydrocarbons found in conventional reservoirs. These pictures show the

Syncrude Mildred plant at Athabasca, Canada Photo: GDFL Jamitzky/Wikimedia

and the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania

2 . (offshore:

A whole range of different structures is used offshore, depending on size and

water depth. In the last few years, we have seen pure sea bottom

installations with multiphase piping to shore, and no offshore topside

Page 59: scientific debate presentation report.docx

structure at all. Replacing outlying wellhead towers, deviation drilling is used

to reach different parts of the reservoir from a few wellhead cluster locations.

The offshore facilities in details in section ( 6 ).

Wellheads-:

The wellhead sits on top of the actual oil or gas well leading down to the

reservoir. A wellhead may also be an injection well, used to inject water or

gas back into the reservoir to maintain pressure and levels to maximize

production.

13

Once a natural gas or oil

well is drilled and it has

been verified that

Page 60: scientific debate presentation report.docx

commercially viable

quantities of natural gas

are present for extraction,

the well must be

“completed” to allow

petroleum or natural gas

to flow out of the

formation and up to the

surface. This process

includes strengthening

the well hole with casing,

evaluating the pressure

and temperature of the formation, and installing the proper equipment to

ensure an efficient flow of natural gas from the well. The well flow is

controlled with a choke.

We differentiate between, dry completion (which is either onshore or on the

Page 61: scientific debate presentation report.docx

deck of an offshore structure) and subsea completions below the surface.

The wellhead structure, often called a Christmas tree, must allow for a

number of operations relating to production and well workover. Well

workover refers to various technologies for maintaining the well and

improving its production capacity.

-Manifolds and gathering:

Onshore, the individual

well streams are brought

into the main production

facilities over a network of

gathering pipelines and

manifold systems. The

purpose of these pipelines

is to allow setup of

Page 62: scientific debate presentation report.docx

production "well sets" so

that for a given production

level, the best reservoir

utilization well flow

composition (gas, oil,

water), etc., can be

selected from the available wells.

14

For gas gathering systems, it is common to meter the individual gathering

lines into the manifold as shown in this picture. For multiphase flows

)combination of gas, oil and water ,(the high cost of multiphase flow meters

often leads to the use of software flow rate estimators that use well test data

to calculate actual flow.

Offshore, the dry completion wells on the main field center feed directly into

production manifolds, while outlying wellhead towers and subsea

Page 63: scientific debate presentation report.docx

installations feed via multiphase pipelines back to the production risers.

Risers are a system that allows a pipeline to "rise" up to the topside

structure. For floating structures, this involves a way to take up weight and

movement. For heavy crude and in Arctic areas, diluents and heating may

be needed to reduce viscosity and allow flow.

Separation-:

Some wells have pure gas

production which can be

taken directly for gas

treatment and/or

compression. More often,

the well produces a

combination of gas, oil and

water, with various

Page 64: scientific debate presentation report.docx

contaminants that must be

separated and processed.

The production separators

come in many forms and

designs, with the classic

variant being the gravity

separator. Photo: JL Bryan

Oilfield Equipment

In gravity separation, the well flow is fed into a horizontal vessel. The

retention period is typically five minutes, allowing gas to bubble out, water to

settle at the bottom and oil to be taken out in the middle. The pressure is

often reduced in several stages (high pressure separator, low pressure

separator, etc.) to allow controlled separation of volatile components. A

sudden pressure reduction might allow flash vaporization leading to

instability and safety hazards.

Page 65: scientific debate presentation report.docx

6.

Onshore facilities

Shallow water complex, which

is characterized by several

independent platforms with

different parts of the process

and utilities linked with gangway

bridges. Individual platforms

include wellhead riser,

processing, accommodations

and power generation platforms.

)This picture shows the BP

Valhall complex.) Typically found

in water depths up to 100

Page 66: scientific debate presentation report.docx

meters .

Gravity base consists of enormous

concrete fixed structures placed on the

bottom, typically with oil storage cells in

a "skirt" that rests on the sea bottom.

The large deck receives all parts of the

process and utilities in large modules.

Large fields at 100 to 500 meters of

water depth were typical in the 1980s

and 1990s. The concrete was poured at

an onshore location, with enough air in

the storage cells to keep the structure

floating until tow-out and lowering onto

the seabed. The picture shows the

world's largest GBS platform, Troll A,

during construction.

Compliant towers are much like fixed

Page 67: scientific debate presentation report.docx

platforms. They consist of a narrow

tower, attached to a foundation on the

seafloor and extending up to the

platform. This tower is flexible, as

opposed to the relatively rigid legs of a

fixed platform. Flexibility allows it to operate in much deeper water, as it can

absorb much of the pressure exerted by the wind and sea. Compliant towers

are used between 500 and 1,000 meters of water depth.

Floating production, where all topside systems are located on a floating

structure with dry or subsea wells. Some floaters are:

FPSO: Floating Production,

Storage and Offloading. Their

main advantage is that they are a

standalone structure that does not

Page 68: scientific debate presentation report.docx

need external infrastructure such

as pipelines or storage. Crude oil

is offloaded to a shuttle tanker at

regular intervals, from days to

weeks, depending on production

and storage capacity. FPSOs

currently produce from around

10,000 to 200,000 barrels per day.

An FPSO is typically a tanker type

hull or barge, often converted from

an existing crude oil tanker (VLCC

or ULCC). Due to the increasing

sea depth for new fields, they

dominate new offshore field

development at more than 100

meters water depth.

The wellheads or subsea risers

from the sea bottom are located

on a central or bow-mounted

Page 69: scientific debate presentation report.docx

turret, so that the ship can rotate

freely to point into wind, waves or

current. The turret has wire rope

and chain connections to several

anchors (position mooring-

POSMOOR), or it can be

dynamically positioned using

thrusters (dynamic positioning–

DYNPOS). Most installations use

subsea wells. The main process is

placed on the deck, while the hull

is used for storage and offloading

to a shuttle tanker. It may also be

used for the transportation of

pipelines.

FPSOs with additional processing

and systems, such as drilling and

production and stranded gas LNG

production are planned.

Page 70: scientific debate presentation report.docx

A variation of the FPSO is the Sevan Marine design. This uses a circular hull

which shows the same profile to wind, waves and current, regardless of

direction. It shares many of the characteristics of the ship-shaped FPSO,

such as high storage capacity and deck load, but does not rotate and

therefore does not need a rotating turret.

Tension Leg Platform (TLP–

left side in picture) consists of

a structure held in place by

vertical tendons connected to

the sea floor by pile-secured

templates. The structure is

held in a fixed position by

tensioned tendons, which

provide for use of the TLP in a

broad water depth range up to

Page 71: scientific debate presentation report.docx

about 2,000m. The tendons

are constructed as hollow high

tensile strength steel pipes that

carry the spare buoyancy of

the structure and ensure

limited vertical motion.

Semi-submersible platforms

)front of picture (have a similar

design but without taut

mooring. This permits more

lateral and vertical motion and

is generally used with flexible

risers and subsea wells.

Similarly, Seastar platforms are

miniature floating tension leg

platforms, much like the semisubmersible

type, with

tensioned tendons.

Page 72: scientific debate presentation report.docx

SPAR consists of a single tall

floating cylindrical hull,

supporting a fixed deck. The

cylinder does not, however,

extend all the way to the

seabed. Rather, it is tethered to

the bottom by a series of cables and lines. The large cylinder serves to

stabilize the platform in the water, and allows for movement to absorb the

force of potential hurricanes. SPARs can be quite large and are used for

water depths from 300 up to 3,000 meters. SPAR is not an acronym, and is

named for its resemblance to a ship's spar. SPARs can support dry

completion wells, but are more often used with subsea wells .

Page 73: scientific debate presentation report.docx

7. Environmental considerations in the petroleum activities

Environmental and climate considerations have always been an

integral part of Norwegian petroleum activities. A comprehensive

policy instrument scheme safeguards environmental and climate

considerations in all phases of the petroleum activities, from licensing

rounds to exploration, development, operation and cessation.

The strict restrictions on flaring under the Petroleum Act contribute

to keeping the general flaring level on the Norwegian shelf low,

compared with the international level.

As one of the first countries in the world, Norway introduced

Page 74: scientific debate presentation report.docx

a CO2 tax in 1991. The tax has led to technological development

and triggered measures that have yielded considerable emission

reductions. The authorities and the petroleum industry have worked

together to reach the goal of zero harmful discharges to sea (the

zero discharge goal). The goal is considered to have been achieved

for added chemicals. As a result of a continuing strong emphasis on

the environment, the Norwegian petroleum sector maintains a very

high environmental standard compared with petroleum activities in

other countries.

This chapter provides an overview of emissions to air and discharges

to sea from the petroleum activities, as well as policy instruments

Page 75: scientific debate presentation report.docx

and measures that safeguard environmental and climate

considerations.

Emissions and discharges from the petroleum activities

Emissions to air from the petroleum sector are generally exhaust

gases from combustion of natural gas in turbines, flaring of natural

Page 76: scientific debate presentation report.docx

gas and combustion of diesel (see Figure 9.2). The flue gas contains

e.g. CO2 and NOx. Other emissions include nmVOC, methane (CH4)

and sulphur dioxide (SO2). Discharges to sea from the petroleum

sector contain remnants of oil and chemicals used in the production

processes. There are also discharges to sea of drill cuttings with

remnants of water-based drilling fluids.

Page 77: scientific debate presentation report.docx

CO2 emission status

Nationally, the petroleum activities accounted for about 29 per cent

of CO2 emissions in 2011 (see Figure 9.1). The other large sources

of CO2 emissions in Norway are emissions from industrial processes

and road traffic. Updated information on production and emissions

in the petroleum sector indicates that emissions from the petroleum

Page 78: scientific debate presentation report.docx

sector are estimated to increase until about 2017, and then gradually

decrease. The development must be seen in context with the

expected production of oil and gas on the Norwegian shelf. Recent

developments on the Norwegian continental shelf have headed

towards more mature fields and longer distances for gas transport.

Processing and transport of produced gas is more energy-intensive

than production and transport of liquids. Gas production has

accounted for an increasing share of emissions on the Norwegian

continental shelf. In addition, the gas fields’ reservoir pressure is

decreasing. Several major oil fields have been discovered in recent

years and have been scheduled for development.

Page 79: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Greenhouse emissions

The most effective greenhouse gas is water vapor. Water naturally

evaporates from the sea and spreads out, and can amplify or suppress the

other effects because of its reflective and absorbing capability.

The two most potent emitted greenhouse gases emitted are CO2 and

methane. Because of its heat-trapping properties and lifespan in the

atmosphere, methane's effect on global warming is 22-25 times higher than

CO2 per kilo released to atmosphere. By order of importance to greenhouse

effects, CO2 emissions contribute 72-77%, methane 14-18%, nitrous oxides

8-9% and other gases less than 1%. (sources: Wikipedia, UNEP)

The main source of carbon dioxide emissions is burning of hydrocarbons.

Page 80: scientific debate presentation report.docx

Out of 29 billion tons (many publications use teragram (Tg) = million tons) of

CO2 emitted in 2008, 18 billion tons or about 60% of the total comes from oil

137

and gas, the remainder is coal, peat and renewable bioenergy, such as

firewood. 11% or 3.2 billion tons comes from the oil and gas industry itself in

the form of losses, local heating, power generation, etc.

The annual emissions are about 1% of total atmospheric CO2, which is in

balance with about 50 times more carbon dioxide dissolved in seawater. This

balance is dependent on sea temperature: Ocean CO2 storage is reduced as

temperature increases, but increases with the partial pressure of CO2 in the

atmosphere. Short term, the net effect is that about half the CO2 emitted to

Page 81: scientific debate presentation report.docx

air contributes to an increase of atmospheric CO2 by about 1.5 ppm annually.

For methane, the largest source of human activity-related methane

emissions to atmosphere is from rice paddies and enteric fermentation in

ruminant animals (dung and compost) from 1.4 billion cows and buffalos.

These emissions are estimated at 78.5 Tg/year (source: FAO) out of a total

of 200 Tg, which is equivalent to about 5,000 Tg of CO2. Methane from the

oil and gas industry accounts for around 30% of emissions, mainly from

losses in transmission and distribution pipelines and systems for natural gas.

Page 82: scientific debate presentation report.docx