Top Banner
Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015
20

Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

Jan 18, 2016

Download

Documents

Myron Bryan
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

Science Leadership Network Meeting

SEPTEMBER 2015

Page 2: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

INTRO AND AGENDA FOR THE DAY:

• Welcome

• Who is here????

• Bringing up to speed/tuning the work

• Materials from the past put into action

• Evidence Statements

• Interactive lesson connection to PE

• Personalize the process

Page 3: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

WELCOME

• Who are you and where are you from?

• What do you wish to get out of this year?

• What is the scope of this year?

• What do we wish to accomplish this year?

• Expectations

Page 4: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

BRINGING UP TO SPEED/TUNING THE WORK

• What tools will be we using:

• Dissection

• Intent

• Framework

• Appendix from NGSS

• Grade Level PE

Page 5: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

INTENT PROTOCOL

Follow the intent protocol with the presenters using the dissection guide and materials listed above

Gaining a common understanding of the PE’s

Page 6: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

MATERIALS FROM THE PAST PUT INTO ACTION

• How does the use of the:

• Intent protocol

• Dissection guide

• Framework

• Appendix of NGSS

Allow teachers to truly understand the true meaning of the PE’s and how does this shape instruction.

Page 7: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

EVIDENCE STATEMENTS 101

What They Are How They are Structured

Page 8: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

WHY EVIDENCE STATEMENTS?

A PE and the accompanying foundation boxes have a lot of information (enough?), but they do not explicitly provide guidance about what it looks like for a student to use those three dimensions together in a purposeful way.

Page 9: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

ES WERE WRITTEN TO HELP PROVIDE EDUCATORS WITH:

1. what skills and knowledge students must be able to demonstrate for ‘proficient’ performance on any given PE at the end of instruction

2. what student performance at the nexus of the three dimensions looks like

Page 10: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

ES FOR ANY GIVEN PE DESCRIBE EXACTLY THE SAME EXPECTATIONS FOR STUDENTS AS THE PE ITSELF, SIMPLY WITH MORE DETAIL…

An analogy: Imagine a leaf under a microscope: when the magnification increases, more features become visible. Those features were always present, but required a different level of scrutiny to make them apparent. Similarly, the content (across all three dimensions) included in the evidence statements is the same content included in the PEs, just at a different level of magnification.

Page 11: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

STRUCTURE OF THE EVIDENCE STATEMENTS

• All Evidence Statements are written through the lens of the Science and Engineering Practice (SEP) associated with a given PE

• The SEP is NOT most important, but it is the dimension that makes student work directly observable

• NGSS writers created a TEMPLATE for each SEP at each grade band and then used those templates to generate Evidence Statements for each PE

Page 12: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

DEVELOPING AND USING MODELSGENERAL OBSERVABLE FEATURES OF THE PRACTICES BY THE END OF 2ND GRADE.

Page 13: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

DEVELOPING AND USING MODELSGENERAL OBSERVABLE FEATURES OF THE PRACTICES BY THE END OF 2ND GRADE.

Page 14: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.
Page 15: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.
Page 16: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

RECAP…1. The structure of the ES is through the lens of the SEP

because that’s what is directly observable about student work

2. Templates were created for each SEP to provide a framework and ensure consistency

3. ES describe the skills and knowledge students must be able to demonstrate for ‘proficient’ performance on any given PE at the end of instruction

4. ES describe what student performance looks like at the nexus of the three dimensions

5. ES for any given PE describe exactly the same expectations for students as the PE itself, simply with more detail

Page 17: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

INTERACTIVE LESSON

As you participate in the lesson take the following notes:

What connection is there to the LE you explored this morning?

What suggestions/idea could you take to utilize in your classroom?

What other information would you like to know, questions you may have, needs for your classroom?

What was one thing you did not know prior to the interactive lesson that could enrich your classroom?

Page 18: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

PERSONALIZE THE PROCESS

Following the process from the morning utilizing the PE/LE your brought with you:

Did you reach the intent of the PE

Did the PE match the LE intent

How did the intent you came up with match that of the evidence statements?

What do you need to change/alter or revise from your Learning Experiences?

Page 19: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

WRAP – UP / GOALS / EVALUATION

Individual/ group goal setting for the upcoming year

What is your role as facilitator in your District/school and how will you spread the information given to ensure building capacity?

What goals will you let in regard to leading your District/School through the PLC process leading to successful implementation at all grade levels?

Page 20: Science Leadership Network Meeting SEPTEMBER 2015.

NEXT MEETING

OCTOBER 19th