Special Education Leadership Network Meeting January 13, 2011
Mar 23, 2016
Special Education Leadership Network
MeetingJanuary 13, 2011
Celebrations
Public Input Meeting
Legal Update
http://www.fastexas.org
Financial Allocation Study for Texas(FAST)
Update: Schedule of
Services
Speech Therapy and Related Services
Patterns of Service
“weekly reference”
30 minutes 5X in a 6 weeks
1 time a week for 30 minutes for 5 weeks, one week with no services so therapists may
access carryover in general education classroom, in a 6 week period
180 minutes per six week period
45 minutes for 4 consecutive weeks and two weeks with no services to determine generalization, in a six week period
10-30 minutes sessions in a 6-week period
2 sessions for 30 minutes for four weeks and then 1 time for 30 minutes for two weeks in a
6-week period
1- 45 minutes every 3 weeks
Okay as is
60 minutes per semester
1-60 minute session every 18 weeks
SPP 7:Early Childhood Outcomes
Submitting Data to TEA
TEA l Division of IDEA Coordination 21
Every district and charter must have one Certifier identified. The Certifier must have a TEASE account and the application for SPP 7.
For Security purposes, there can only be one Certifier per district for the SPP 7 online data collection application.
SPP7 Data Collection 10-11
Revoking User Roles
If the person established as the Certifier has left that position or the district, that role will need to be revoked by the Superintendent before a new Certifier can have access.
The Superintendent must log into TEASE and access User Administration+ to revoke the role.
More information including a self guided training presentation can be found at: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/webappaccess/AppRef.htm
TEA l Division of IDEA Coordination 22SPP7 Data Collection 10-11
Timeline for Submitting to TEA
For 2010-11 school year:
• Application will open November 1, 2010• Application will close on August 31, 2011• The application will only allow data from the current fiscal year to be entered.• Date services “Began” or “Ended” must be between July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011.
TEA l Division of IDEA Coordination 23SPP7 Data Collection 10-11
SPP 11: Timely Evaluation
(Child Find)
SPP 11 Data Collection 2010-11 TEA│IDEA Coordination 24
SPP 11 Data Collection 2010-11
Indicator 11: Timely Initial Evaluation
Compliance Target:
• 100% of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined with in 90 days (State established timeline)
• This is a compliance target set by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) TEA│IDEA Coordination 25
SPP 11 Data Collection 2010-11
Who is reported in SPP 11-a
Who is reported in row a:
• Report all eligibility determinations completed between July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011• Report children who are transitioning from Part C to Part B under both SPP 11 (Timely
evaluations) and SPP 12 (Early Childhood Transition)• Include children referred to the district before age 3, but not served in Part C (ECI)
TEA│IDEA Coordination 26
SPP 11 Data Collection 2010-11
Reporting Accurate Data: Understanding SPP 11
Who is not included SPP 11 data collection:
• Do not report students for whom the evaluation process was interrupted and the district was unable to complete the evaluation process• For example:
• Student moves out of state• Parent withdraws consent• Parent repeatedly refused or failed to produce child therefore leaving the process incomplete
TEA│IDEA Coordination 27
SPP 11 Data Collection 2010-11
Who is reported in SPP 11-a: Exception to Timeline
Parent caused Delay:
• Report any students for whom the evaluation process was delayed (and later completed) because the parent of the child repeatedly failed or refused to produce the child for evaluation.§300.302(d)(1)
• The district should count this student in a. and in compliance in row b or c (subset of a.)TEA│IDEA Coordination 28
SPP 11 Data Collection 2010-11
Who is reported in SPP 11-a: Exceptions to Timeline
Student moves prior to eligibility determination:
• Report any students that enrolls into district B after the timeline has begun but prior to eligibility determination by district A. The receiving district B must be making sufficient progress to ensure a prompt completion of the evaluation and the district and the parent must agree to a specific time when the evaluation will be completed.§300.301(d)(2)(e)
• The District holding the ARDC meeting should count this student in row a and in compliance in rows b or c (subset of a).
TEA│IDEA Coordination 29
ESC Region XIII IDEA Compliance and Support
Laura Abbott Linda McDaniel (Charter Schools) [email protected] [email protected] 512-919-5207 512-919-5225
Regional Focused Special
Education Indicator Portfolio
SPP: Green= 100% Districts Compliant Red= District(s) noncompliant ( )=# of Districts
PBMAS: Green= No Districts with 2s or 3s Red= District(s) have 2s/3s
( )=# of Districts
Alignment Activity
TCASE Update
Announcements/ To Do List
LUNCH
Lunch