SANJAY R SINGHAL, RA - WordPress.comMar 13, 2016 · 33 As defined by Sanjay R Singhal, the four (4) features which define a branch assembly are as follows: clear, present interweaving
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Weather: Absolutely, beautifully hot and humid, slightly overcast
Present : Myself, and others (names changed and/or withheld for publication)
Sanjay’s Note: Certain aspects of this report may be more subjective in their perspective; the reader’s gracious
indulgence is requested. Not all of these phenomena are understood, yet are reported nonetheless as an integral
and vital portion of my own investigations.
Items Noted:
On Sunday, 13 March 2016, I investigated a large, wooded reserve in Seminole County, Florida;1 the weather
was beautifully hot and humid, and slightly overcast.2 In the carpark, I observed a large, posted map presenting
the various paths through the reserve; I was not familiar with any of them, and set off, instead, through a wide,
bare field, roughly south/southwest.3
As we were walking, I had a strong impression that we were not alone; something seemed to be lurking in the
heavy, thick woods to the west.4 5
“I hate to say this,” I said, “But I don’t think we’re alone out here.”
“You’re probably right,” someone answered.
We continued walking, crossing the field to the south, and coming upon a large, rather ugly tortoise. The
animal was walking, with some difficulty, through the tall scrub grasses; the weather was becoming quite hot
and I felt some sympathy for him.
“Don’t get too close,” someone said, “It’s a Gopher Tortoise; they have sharp jaws.” 6
We continued walking; in an isolated clump of trees and brush, we observed two tall, slender saplings, twisted
at approximately knee height, directed (apparently) to the east.
1 Seminole County Government Author(s). Parks and Recreation. Seminole County. http://www.seminolecountyfl.gov/departments-
services/leisure-services/parks-recreation/. 2016. Web. Accessed 11 October 2016. 2 Weather Underground Author(s). Weather History for KSFB March 2016: Sunday, March 13, 2016. Weather Underground.
=Florida&reqdb.zip=32771&reqdb.magic=1&reqdb.wmo=99999. Web. 2016. Accessed 16 July 2016. 3 As has been observed, and commented upon at numerous occasions, I am, quite simply, not like other boys. 4 Paul Schnabel. Possible Vocalisations Heard by Deer Hunter in the Chequamegon National Forest. Bigfoot Field Researchers’
Organisation. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=11026. 24 March 2005. Web. Accessed 25 September 2014. The
realisation that one is not alone in the woods can be overwhelming; at other times thrilling. Needless to say, it is far from dull. 5 Chris Bateman. Archaeologist Digs for Proof of Sasquatch. Union Democrat.
http://www.uniondemocrat.com/news/story.cfm?story_no=22545 [link no longer active] Reprinted BigfootEncounters.com:
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/strain.htm. Date Unknown. Web. Accessed 16 October 2014. The sense of a presence in
the woods, albeit unseen and unknown, is not uncommon to EC encounters. 6 Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Author(s). Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). Florida Fish & Wildlife
Conservation Commission. http://myfwc.com/GopherTortoise. 2016. Web. Accessed 16 July 2016.
The first photograph presents a view of the meadow, looking to the west; the second photograph presents a view
along the vehicle-access road, also looking to the west. In both situations, I had a distinct impression
of…something…lurking in the shadows, but made no direct, visual observations.9 10
The first photograph presents a view of the woods along the vehicle-access road, notice the thick, heavy brush
and the blending of colours, light, and shadow, rendering clear, direct observation almost nil. In the second
photograph, notice the long, heavy branch placed upon the wire fencing; similar constructions have been
observed at Area K, in northern Michigan.11
“I hate to say this,” I said again, “But I really do think we’re being watched.” 12 13 14
9 Ibid, Bateman. Archaeologist Digs for Proof of Sasquatch. 10 Please refer to the Addendum for a further review of the photographs which immediately followed the first image. 11 Sanjay R Singhal. Field Report 03.10.2012: Area K (with Addendum). Beyond The Forest.
https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/field-report-03-10-2012-area-k-with-addendum/. 6 February 2015. Web.
Accessed 16 July 2016. 12 EB Titchener. The Feeling of Being Stared At. Science: Volume 8; pp 895-897. 1898. Scopaesthesia, sometimes referred to as the
Psychic Staring Effect, was first explored by Titchener in the 19th century. Further laboratory experiments to replicate this effect
appear to have failed. 13 Rupert Sheldrake. The Sense of Being Stared At: And Other Aspects of the Extended Mind. New York: Random House; 2013. 14 Dr Jeff Meldrum. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. New York: Macmillan Publishers; 2007. Scopaesthesia has been reported
almost universally by EC investigators, researchers and enthusiasts. Meldrum describes it as a strongly subjective feeling, which
http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/report_detail.php?id=01522. 12 October 2004. Web. Accessed 16 October 2014. Strong, intense
apprehensions are not uncommon to EC encounters, especially in heavy, deep forest. 16 Ibid, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Author(s). Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). 17 The appropriate inference may be readily made. 18 Although no sound of movement was heard, the general atmosphere was that of peaceful slumber, rather than an eerie stillness. 19 Ditto. 20 Eric Lester. Resident Reports Numerous Incidents in his Neighbourhood outside Allen, near Borders of Indiana, Michigan, and
Ohio. Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=15187. 13 July 2006. Web.
Accessed 30 October 2014. Movement in the brush is a common feature of EC encounters. 21 This is an entirely subjective statement, which cannot be quantified. Nonetheless, this was my impression at the time.
The first photograph presents a view of the thick, heavy brush flanking the vehicle-access road, where we heard
the sounds of movement; they remained in this location throughout our visit. The second photograph presents a
view of the swamp forest as we passed along the game trail; at this point in the investigation I began to realise
that we were not alone. I felt, and maintained a strong impression of being watched.22
“Why,” I asked, “Would an animal not scurry away and hide, but remain within range, jumping about?”
“It could be a nesting female,” someone said, “Trying to protect her young.”
We continued to listen for a few moments, then someone gestured to the right.
“Look over here,” they said, “There’s a game trail, leading into the swamp forest.”
“Should we follow it for a bit, to see where it goes?” I asked.
“Sure, let’s go.”
The game trail led west/southwest, deeper into the swamp forest, picking its way through tall, lush grasses and
heavy brush. There were a great many branches leaning over the trail, rendering visibility quite difficult. We
had not gone far when someone stopped, and said, “Do you have a big stick?”
“No,” I answered. “What do I need a big stick for?”
“Rattlesnakes.” 23 24
“Oh, my god!”
22 Ibid, Meldrum. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. 23 Central Florida Zoo Author(s). Florida’s Venomous Snakes. Central Florida Zoo.
http://www.centralfloridazoo.org/floridasvenomoussnakes. 2016. Web. Accessed 11 October 2016. There are four venomous snakes
found in central Florida, including the dusky pygmy rattlesnake and the eastern diamondback rattlesnake. Oh, yay. 24 Florida Museum of Natural History Author(s). List of Florida Venomous Snakes. Florida Museum of Natural History.
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/herpetology/fl-snakes/venomous-snakes. Web. Date Unknown. Accessed 16 July 2016. Of the
approximately fifty known snake species known in Florida, at least six are considered poisonous. Of these, at least three are
rattlesnakes, including the Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus), Timber Rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus), and
“They like to hide under the leaves,” someone said, “If you find one, let me know, so I can wrestle with it.” 25
I was wearing only deck shoes, and shorts; I was hardly dressed for an excursion through snake-infested woods.
“Maybe there aren’t any,” I countered.
“Oh, they’re here, all right.” 26
I continued, at a slower pace, watching my step carefully; I did not want to step on anything…alive. I began to
look around the area; everything was eerily, remarkably quiet.27
“I hate to say this,” I spoke, sounding almost too loud, “But have you noticed how quiet it is?”
I took several photographs, turning around and scanning the woods. There was almost no sound of movement
or even a breath of wind; everything was strangely, almost unnaturally still.28
“I hate to say this,” I said, “But, I feel like we’re being watched.” 29
We then returned to the main road, continuing east for a bit, and then turning south again. The weather,
although increasingly hot and humid, was absolutely gorgeous.30 Some clouds were coming up from the west,
and I thought it might rain. To the southeast, an abandoned, heavily overgrown vehicle-access road led into the
heavy woods; we elected to follow this for some distance. Again, I maintained an impression we were not
alone, and said so.31
“I don’t think we’re alone out here,” I said.
“I don’t think you’re wrong,” someone answered.
I observed a large, arched branch configuration, positioned directly over the road; it was perfectly formed, and
still attached to an upright, living tree.
“Look at the orientation,” I said, “It is to the southwest, through the brush, and across the road.”
“What are you saying, Sanjay?” someone asked me.
“I think that arched branches are directional,” I said, “And, I think that they are telling us that something has to
be crossed, or stepped over. A road, or a stream; railroad tracks, and so on.” 32
25 He wasn’t kidding, either. 26 As one may imagine, this was hardly a comforting statement. 27 BFRO Authors. Silent Woods. The Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.
http://s2.excoboard.com/exco/archive.php?ac=t&forumid=125336&date=02-24-2010&t=2120282-1. 24 February 2010. Web.
Accessed 5 August 2014. The utter stillness and quiet of the woods has been observed, and commented upon, several times, by
several persons; it is not uncommon in conjunction with reported sightings and/or encounters. 28 Ibid. 29 Ibid, Meldrum. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. 30 One may consider the weather in northern Illinois in March, as a comparison. 31 Ibid, Schnabel. Possible Vocalisations Heard by Deer Hunter in the Chequamegon National Forest. 32 This is my own interpretation; others may present a different perspective.
The first photograph presents a view of the large, arched branch, observed along the abandoned vehicle-access
road; notice its overall size compared to the tall man standing beneath. The second photograph presents a view
of the clearing, where I observed the small, beautifully constructed glyph assemblies.
These photographs present the small, beautifully constructed glyph assemblies observed in the clearing,
immediately adjacent to each other; it is reasonable to suggest artificial construction. The triple-branch type of
glyph, sometimes observed upright, is most usually constructed similar to the first photograph; ie a ‘star’ or
‘asterisk’ formation, and with all components joined at their centres. The ‘A’ formation, also sometimes
observed upright, is presented in the second photograph. Notice, in both images, the use of multiple branch
components, sizes, thicknesses, colours, and bark textures. 33 34 35
33 As defined by Sanjay R Singhal, the four (4) features which define a branch assembly are as follows: clear, present interweaving of
components; multiplicity of component species; multiplicity of component sizes; and visually contrasting component species colours,
bark, and textures. To this may be added the application of long, slender components supporting large, heavier ones, and/or the
stripping of leaves and twigs from the components, although these are not always observed. 34 The use of the word ‘glyph’ in EC-related context, must be considered carefully; it is not archaeological, specifically referring to a
carved or inscribed symbol, whether in wood, leather or other materials. It may, nonetheless, be considered somewhat grammatical,
representing an object (ie, a pictogram) or an idea or concept (ie, an ideogram). Further elaboration of this theory may be found in my
analyses of the Chisholm Assembly. 35 In EC-related context, the use of the word ‘glyph’ may be defined as any type of branch assembly based on the ground, ie lying flat
or horizontally, usually without any vertically positioned or aligned components, and usually bearing a strong resemblance to certain
http://bigfootsightings.org/modoc-national-forest-bigfoot-sighting-1980s-northern-california/. Date Unknown. Web. Accessed 7
August 2015. Although somewhat subjective, the feeling of trespassing or intruding in the forest, has been reported elsewhere. 38 Please refer to the previous page for a more detailled description of same. 39 Joshua Paul ‘JP’ Smith (1975-2015) was a prominent researcher and investigator in central Florida. He was my closest friend, and
partner in all things EC-related. I miss him, terribly. 40 Ibid, Singhal. Field Report 08.16.2015: Illinois Beach State Park. Beyond The Forest.
https://beyondtheforestblog.wordpress.com/2015/10/20/field-report-08-16-2015-illinois-beach-state-park/. 20 October 2015. Web.
Accessed 16 July 2016. 41 Jim Sloan. The Average Inches per Stride in Running. LiveHealthy.Chron. http://livehealthy.chron.com/average-inches-per-stride-
running-8064.html. 2015. Web. Accessed 19 October 2015. The average running stride length of an adult human male ranges from
seventy-four inches for distance runners (74in, or 187.96cm) to ninety-three inches for sprinters (93in, or 236.22cm).
We returned to the meadow, but turned too far west, and came up to the main road instead. Again, I maintained
a strong impression we were not alone, that we were being carefully observed, from a distance.42 43 We walked
back through the meadow to access the carpark; beneath a solitary tree, we observed a gleaming, white piece of
bone.
“Look,” someone said, “It’s a remnant spinal column, from a White-Tailed Deer.” 44
I could not help but have the impression of a gift;45 it seemed strange to find it so prominently placed, on a bed
of soft, brown moss. There were no other bones nearby.
We returned to the carpark, and left the area shortly thereafter.
Respectfully submitted,
Sanjay R Singhal, RA
*Name(s) changed for publication
42 Ibid, Schnabel. Possible Vocalisations Heard by Deer Hunter in the Chequamegon National Forest. 43 Ibid, Meldrum. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. 44 Ibid, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Author(s). Deer: Odocoileus virginianus. Florida Fish & Wildlife
Conservation Commission. http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/profiles/mammals/land/deer/. Web. 2016. Accessed 16 July 2016. 45 Kim Fleming. Strange Findings along a Trail near a Home outside Lake City. Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.
http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?id=42351. 27 October 2013. Web. Accessed 9 December 2014. Accounts of gifts being
left in visible, noticeable places, although not common, are reported across the country; I myself have witnessed this behaviour in
Substantiation of this Report may be provided, in part, by the BFRO (Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation),
which lists three reports for Seminole County, Florida;46 additionally, the GCBRO (Gulf Coast Bigfoot
Research Organisation) has published a sighting report from 1983.47 Further investigation and discussion of the
Skunk Ape48 phenomenon may be found on the Smithsonian website as well.49 Other researchers and/or
investigators may offer additional evidence and documentation.
The combination of physical, visual, audible and/or olfactory events described in this Report are as follows:
1. The pair of curiously twisted saplings, both oriented to the woods on the east side of the meadow;
2. The long, heavy branch positioned atop the wire fencing;
3. The sudden, loud noise of movement in the brush;
4. The eerie stillness and quiet all around us, as we entered the swamp forest;
5. The large, arched branch on the abandoned vehicle-access road;
6. The pair of beautifully constructed, ground-based glyphs observed in the clearing;
7. The large, wide, deeply impressed toes observed on the vehicle-access road;
8. The remarkable stride length of same;
9. The remnant spinal column of a White-tailed Deer, observed on a bed of brown moss.
These behaviours, and the history of my own experience(s), may be considered sufficient to suggest the
presence of EC50 in Seminole County, Florida, in the late spring of 2016.
A number of subjective events also occurred. While these cannot be considered conclusive evidence, neither
should they be discounted. Although it is reasonable to review the impact of non-objective stimuli in this
Report, such effects, while personally quite vivid and at times overwhelming, are nonetheless nearly impossible
to substantiate with any measure of certainty.
46 BFRO Author(s). Seminole County, Florida. Bigfoot Field Researchers’ Organisation.
http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_county_reports.asp?state=fl&county=Seminole. 2016. Web. Accessed 16 July 2016. 47 GCBRO Author(s). Seminole County, Florida. Gulf Coast Bigfoot Researchers’ Organisation.
http://www.gcbro.com/FLsemin0001.html. Date Unknown. Web. Accessed 16 July 2016. 48 Joe Nickell. Tracking Florida’s Skunk Ape. Committee for Skeptical Enquiry.
http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/tracking_floridas_skunk_ape. 2013. Web. Accessed 16 July 2016. 49 Joseph Stromberg. On the Trail of Florida’s Bigfoot – the Skunk Ape. Smithsonian. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-
nature/trail-floridas-bigfoot-skunk-ape-180949981/. 6 March 2014. Web. Accessed 16 July 2016. 50 EC, in this context, stands for “Elder Children”, as usual.