Safety and performance of the resorbable magnesium scaffold, Magmaris in a real world setting - First cohort subjects at 12-month follow-up of the BIOSOLVE-IV registry Michael Lee, MD Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hong Kong SAR On behalf of the BIOSOLVE-IV investigators
10
Embed
Safety and performance of the resorbable magnesium ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Safety and performance of the resorbable magnesium scaffold,
Magmaris in a real world setting - First cohort subjects at 12-month follow-up
of the BIOSOLVE-IV registry
Michael Lee, MDQueen Elizabeth Hospital
Hong Kong SAROn behalf of the BIOSOLVE-IV investigators
Potential conflicts of interest
Michael Lee
Speaker's name : Michael Lee
☑ I do not have the potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Magmaris (DREAMS 2G)
Michael Lee
• 6-crown 2-link design
• 150 µm strut thickness
• 150 µm strut width
• Optimized scaffold design for
Higher bending flexibility
Higher acute radial force
Slower resorption rate: 95% at 12 months
• Sirolimus drug elution & PLLA (ORSIRO BIOlute coating)
• Tantalum radiopaque markers
• Gained CE mark in June 2016
Sirolimus + PLLA (BIOlute)
90-Day Faxitron, porcine explant
150 µm
150 µm
Registry Design
Design
• Prospective, multi-center (up to 120 sites in up to 30
countries), real world setting registry
Primary Endpoint
• Target Lesion Failure (TLF) at 12 months
Secondary Endpoints (at 6 months, 1-5 years)
• TLF*
• Clinically Driven TLR and TVR
• Cardiac Death
• Target Vessel MI
• Procedure and Device Success
• Scaffold thrombosis at 12 months (powered for
superiority of Magmaris compared to Absorb)
Coordinating Clinical Investigators
• S. Verheye, MD, Belgium – Europe
• M. Lee, MD, Hong Kong – Asia Pacific
2054 patients with
de novo coronary artery stenosis
6-month Clinical FUP
12-month Clinical FUP
24-month Clinical FUP
60-month Clinical FUP
36-month Clinical FUP
48-month Clinical FUP
*TLF: composite of target vessel myocardial
infarction, clinically driven TLR, cardiac death
and emergent CABG
Michael Lee
Enrollment & Registry Organization
• Data being presented for Cohort 1 (1075 subjects)
• Subjects were enrolled according to the consensus letter1, 4Ps and Instruction for Use (IFU)
• NSTEMI subjects included in BIOSOLVE-IV
• 4P Strategy
• Independent Clinical Events Committee: Adjudication of all ADE, SADE, USADE and endpoint related SAE
• Independent Core laboratory imaging analysis of endpoint related events
• 25 % source data verification
Patient & lesion selection
Proper scaffold sizing
Pre-dilatation for lesion
preparation
Post-dilatation
Michael Lee
1. Fajadet et al., EuroIntervention 2016; 12:828-833
Baseline Patient & Lesion Characteristics
Baseline Characteristics N (%)
Age (mean ± SD) 61.3 ± 10.5
Male 806 (75.0)
Hypertension 724 (67.3)
Hyperlipidemia 713 (66.3)
Smoking history 654 (61.1)
Diabetes mellitus 228 (21.2)
Insulin dependent 45 (19.7)
Non-Insulin dependent 183 (80.3)
History of MI 219 (20.4)
Previous percutaneous Intervention
287 (26.7)
NSTEMI 206 (19.2)
Lesion Location N (%)
LAD 561 (50.0)
LCX 213 (19.0)
RCA 333 (29.7)
Ramus intermedius 14 (1.2)
Lesion Characteristics* N (%)
Lesion length (mm ± SD) 14.9 ± 4.2
RVD (mm ± SD) 3.2 ± 0.3
AHA / ACC Lesion Class B2 / C 170 (15.2)
Calcification moderate / severe 82 (7.3)
Bifurcation lesions 57 (5.1)
Michael Lee
*Lesion characteristics are estimated by investigator
Target Lesion Failure out to 12 Months
Device success: 97.3% & Procedure success: 98.9%
• 1 Composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and emergent CABG. Peri-procedural MI according to SCAI definition and spontaneous MI according to the Extended Historical definition.
• All events have been adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee
0 30 180 365
Time to Event [days]
0
5
10
15
20
25
100
4.3% [95% CI: 3.2;5.7]
TLF
[%]1
Michael Lee
0.5% [95% CI: 0.2;1.1]
Secondary endpoints out to 12 Months
Michael Lee
0 30 180 365Time to Event [days]
0
5
10
15
20
25
100
Targ
et v
esse
l MI[
%]
0 30 180 365
Time to Event [days]
0
5
10
15
20
25
100
Car
dia
cD
eath
[%
]
0 30 180 365Time to Event [days]
0
5
10
15
20
25
100
Clin
ical
ly d
rive
n T
LR [
%]
1.1% [95% CI: 0.6;2.0]
3.9% [95% CI: 2.9;5.3]
0.2% [95% CI: 0.0;0.7]
4 out of 5 scaffold thrombosis cases had early
antiplatelet or anticoagulant interruption
after procedure
0 30 180 365
Time to Event [days]
0
5
10
15
20
25
100
Scaf
fold
th
rom
bo
sis
[%]
(def
init
e/p
rob
able
)1
Conclusions
BIOSOLVE-IV confirms low TLF rates (4.3% at 12-month) from
previous trials also in a real world setting with 115 centers in 25 countries
Excellent device success (97.3%) and procedure success (98.9%)
Very good safety profile of the scaffold up to 12-month
• 0.2% cardiac death
• 0.5% scaffold thrombosis
• 0.1% scaffold thrombosis rate excluding cases with early antiplatelet or anticoagulant interruption