RTPI-CIH Planning for Housing Network 12th February 2015 * Reflections on the Lyons Commission SHARP PLANNING PLUS Malcolm Sharp
Dec 17, 2015
RTPI-CIH Planning for Housing Network
12th February 2015
*Reflections on theLyons Commission
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Malcolm Sharp
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
THE REMIT
• Sponsored by Labour• Independent• Chair: Sir Michael Lyons
• Road map to secure 200,000 homes per year by the end of the next parliament
Personal reflection not speaking for the Commission
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
THE COMMISSIONERS:Chair: Sir Michael Lyons
• Tom Bloxham – Chairman Urban Splash• Mark Clare - C. Exec. Barratts• Julia Evans – C. Exec. N.F.B.• Kate Henderson – C. Exec. T.C.P.A.• Bill Hughes – M.D. Legal and General
Property• Grania Long – C. Exec. C.I.H.• Simon Marsh – Head of Planning Policy RSPB• David Orr – C. Exec. N.H.F.• Richard Parker – Partner & Head of Housing
PWC• Malcolm Sharp – Past Pres P.O.S.• Cllr Ed Turner – Dpty. Ldr. Oxford• Prof. Cecilia Wong – Spatial Plng Univ.
Manchester
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
The LyonsHousing Review Mobilising across thenation to build the homesOur children need
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
• A housing crisis of our own making• National focus on delivery• Land supply• Ensuring land is built out• Communities driving their own development• A new generation of Garden Cities and Garden
Suburbs• The house building industry• Quality, Design and Sustainability• Housing for all
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
THE CASE
• 2013 109,000 new build
• Last 10 years avearge p a 137,000 pa
• Need 243,000 pa
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
THE CASE
• Good homes underpin all our collective ambitions – stable communities, educational attainment; “quality of life”
• A major contribution to a stronger national economy, an important domestic industry, greater labour mobility, building on opportunity
• Critical to the control of inflation• Current system one cause of increasing
inequaliity
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Two background Issues:
Enough land (in the right place)(but its not all planning fault)
Capacity to build(both more ‘developers’ and
‘construction capability skills etc)
But more complex than this.
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
Net rent paid
Mortgage payments
Co
st o
f ho
usi
ng
(2
00
3=
10
0)
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
19711974
19771980
19831986
19891992
19951998
20012004
20072010
20132016
20192022
20252028
20312034
20370%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%Aged 85 & aboveAged 80-84Aged 75-79Aged 70-74
Pe
rce
nt o
f to
tal p
op
ula
tion
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
19
77
19
78
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000 2000+ units501-2000 units101-500 units
Ho
usi
ng
sta
rts
(GB
)
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
19771979
19811983
19851987
19891991
19931995
19971999
20012003
20052007
20092011
20130
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000SMEs (1-500 units)
Nu
mb
er
of h
ou
seb
uild
ers
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Q4 2007
Q2 2008
Q4 2008
Q2 2009
Q4 2009
Q2 2010
Q4 2010
Q2 2011
Q4 2011
Q2 2012
Q4 2012
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Current Land Bank (plots)
Current Land Bank (years of supply)
Cu
rre
nt L
an
d B
an
k (p
lots
)
Cu
rre
nt L
an
d B
an
k (y
ea
rs o
f su
pp
ly)
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
0
5
10
15
20
25Strategic Land - Years of Supply
Ye
ars
of s
up
ply
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
1919/20
1923/24
1927/28
1931/32
1935/36
1939/40
1943/441948
19521956
19601964
19681972
19761980
19841988
19921996
20002004
20082012
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000Local AuthoritiesHousing Associa-tionsPrivate Enterprise
Ho
usi
ng
co
mp
letio
ns
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
1980-81
1982-83
1984-85
1986-87
1988-89
1990-91
1992-93
1994-95
1996-97
1998-99
2000-01
2002-03
2004-05
2006-07
2008-09
2010-11
2012-13
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000Right to Buy
Dw
elli
ng
s
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
Be
lgiu
m
Ire
lan
d
Italy
Po
rtu
ga
l
Sp
ain
No
rwa
y
UK
Sw
ed
en
Ge
rma
ny
De
nm
ark
Fra
nce
Fin
lan
d
Au
stria
Sw
itze
rlan
d
Ne
the
rlan
ds
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Pe
rce
nt o
f re
al e
sta
te in
vest
me
nt p
ort
folio
in
resi
de
ntia
l pro
pe
rty
by
valu
e
SHARP PLANNING PLUSRECOMMENDATIONS:
• A NATIONAL PRIORITY• Cabinet post• Cross Dept Task Force• Re-tasked HCA• Consolidated & Devolved Funding• National Spatial dimension
• LOCAL LEAD • Strategic Housing Market Plans (right to
grow)• Local Plans but on both:
• Sec of State to intervene if necessary• New Homes Corporations• Housing Growth Areas
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• PLANNING• Simplify Plan making (POS proposals)• Use it or loose it (tax on unused
allocations, life of pp and substantial starts)
• ‘red line’ applications• 106 / CIL amendments including re
consideration of neighbourhood share & revert threshold for affordable
• NPPF – revert defn. of affordable - & brownfield first
• NPPG – viability & SHMAs• Annual Monitoring strengthened• Statistics strengthened• Greater emphasis on delivery• Plans - more detail on tenure / need
including PRS & local priority where public stake
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• LOCAL AUTHORITIES (Planning ++++++)• Play much more energetic role in land
assembly• Greater powers in HGAs• CPO reform and compensation
arrangements in HGAs & Garden Cities• Rolling funds / equity investment• Free up borrowing headroom• Local Planning fees
SHARP PLANNING PLUSRECOMMENDATIONS:
• OTHER• Loan guarantees to HAs• Institutional borrowing for PRS• Greater powers in HGAs• Transparency in land market• Revolving infrastructure funds• Garden Cities and suburbs• Support for SMEs• Skills• Quality – building for life, space
standards, new kite mark, zero carbon.• Housing for older people• Reform Right to Buy & New Homes
Bonus
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
SHARP PLANNING PLUS
REFLECTIONS:
• National scandal• Needs national leadership• Most comprehensive report for
years• Common cause and purpose• Complex – action on a variety of
fronts• Local Authority role - planning +
++++ crucial• Remarkable consensus• Politically difficult – limited votes?• Bold but could be bolder?