l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 52L10NW0003 2 .11369 EAGLE LAKE 010 REPORT ON THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS. BEE LAKE PROPERTY, KENORA DISTRICT. ONTARIO NTS 52L/10.11 PREPARED FOR GANDY RESOURCES CORP. DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH * WAHL R. W. Toronto, Ontario June 17, 1988 Ref.: 88-62 This report may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the written permission of Derry, Michener, Booth 6c Wahl. DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH a WAHL
47
Embed
RPT ON GEOPH SUR BEE L PROP€¦ · south of Bee Lake. It connects Gordon Lake, Ontario, site of the old nickel-copper mine of Consolidated Canadian Faraday Ltd., with Lac du Bonnet,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
l lll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
52L10NW0003 2 .11369 EAGLE LAKE010
REPORT ON
THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS.
BEE LAKE PROPERTY,
KENORA DISTRICT. ONTARIO
NTS 52L/10.11
PREPARED FOR
GANDY RESOURCES CORP.
DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH * WAHL
R. W.
Toronto, Ontario June 17, 1988
Ref.: 88-62
This report may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the written permission of Derry, Michener, Booth 6c Wahl.
DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH a WAHL
11 '11111111111111111
111 lllllllll^ 52L10NW0803 2.11369 EAGLE LAKE 010C
INTRODUCTION
PROPERTY LOCATION, DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS
PROPERTY GEOLOGY
SURVEY PARAMETERS AND PRESENTATION
Magnetic SurveyElectromagnetic Survey
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Magnetic SurveyElectromagnetic Survey
RECOMMENDATIONS
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONR. W. Woolham, P.Eng.
APPENDIX I: INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONSAPPENDIX II: TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Location MapFigure 2: Claim Map
LIST OF DRAWINGSOn Map Pocket)
Fluxgate Magnetic Survey, Scale 1:5,000
88-62-01: West Sheet, Values88-62-02: East Sheet, Values88-62-03: West Sheet, Contours 88-62-04: East Sheet, Contours
Geophysical surveys, utilizing the magnetic and electromagnetic methods,
have been completed on the Bee Lake claim group of Gandy Resources Corp. The surveys were performed by the staff of Derry, Michener, Booth to. Wahl (DMBW)
under the direct supervision of the author. The surveys were conducted during the periods June 22 to July 22, 1987 and February l to March 15, 1988. This report
describes the results of the geophysical surveys.
In the 1987 summer field season, DMBW staff carried out a geological
mapping program designed to evaluate the potential of the property for hosting
auriferous iron formation (ref. 87-95). At that time a magnetic survey was
completed over most of the land portions of the claim block. Final evaluation and
interpretation was deferred until all of the geophysical work was completed on
the water portions of the claim block.
PROPERTY LOCATION. DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS
The Bee Lake property is located 10 km east of the Manitoba-Ontario
border, approximately 110 km northwest of Kenora, Ontario and 80 km northeast
of Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba (Figure 1). The property consists of 109 contiguous staked claims covering approximately 1,744 hectares (Figure 2). The claims are as follows:
The property straddles the southeast half of Bee Lake and continues
eastward to cover much of Eden Lake. The property is accessible with float- or
ski-equipped aircraft which can land on either Eden Lake or Rickaby Lake which
lies immediately south of Bee Lake. The nearest road is approximately 25 km
DERRY. MICHENER. BOOTH ft WAHL
l ONTARIO J BEE LAKE Jdr PROPERTY
BEE LAKE PROPERTY
Snowshoe Lake
Trapline Lake
ERNER LAKE
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
l95*00'w
WINGISKUS
LAKE
RICKABY LAKE AREA
G-2638
9S2OS4
991400
l mile
l kilometre
952O33
*. 395I4SI
95131
EAGLE LAKE AREA
G-2615
952OS2
951398
952051
951453
951 SOI
^51492*
952050
951454
951500
931458
95M55
951499
951457 -
951496
951498
9514*5
50*40*11 -
EDEN
•\ LAKE
FIGURE 2
BEE LAKE PROPERTY
CLAIM MAP95*00' W
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
-2-
south of Bee Lake. It connects Gordon Lake, Ontario, site of the old nickel-copper mine of Consolidated Canadian Faraday Ltd., with Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba. Gordon Lake could be used as a staging point for helicopter airlift of a diamond drill to Bee Lake.
PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The property is underlain by acid metavolcanic and clastic
metasedimentary rocks with lesser interbedded acid tuff and quartzite, iron formation and basic metavolcanic rocks. A small body of hornblende-biotite quartz monzonite intrudes the rocks at the east end of Rickaby Lake.
The main acid metavolcanic unit, composed of tuffs, flows and agglomerates, is central to the property. It reaches a maximum thickness between Bee and Anderson lakes but decreases in thickness southeastward as it interdigitates with metasedimentary rocks. The rocks are fine-grained, poorly foliated and weather light grey. The matrix of the agglomerates is dark grey to green.
Metasedimentary rocks comprising predominantly arkose, arkose conglomerate and phyllite are also abundant in the central part of the property. Minor biotite-feldspar quartzite occurs immediately north and south of Rickaby Lake. Interbedded acid tuff and biotite-feldspar quartzite occurs along the northern property boundary.
Iron formation extends southeastward across the property in two discontinuous bands. The thicknesses of the bands range from a few centimeters to approximately 23 m but they are usually about 9 m to 12 m across. Well- bedded magnetite with accessory quartz forms 596 to 1596 of the total volume of the iron formation unit. Magnetite beds are usually 5 cm to 8 cm thick but may vary from less than 2.5 mm to 61 cm. The remainder of the iron formation is phyllite with local lenses of black chert or thin beds of jasper, arkose or dacitic tuff.
DERRY. MICHENER. BOOTH ft WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
-3-
Basic metavolcanic rocks, namely dark grey to black, fine-grained,
foliated amphibolites and epidote amphibolites are present along the southern
property boundary.
Several small faults crosscut the stratigraphy. The faults generally trend
north-northeast but a few also trend east-southeast.
Geochemically anomalous gold values up to 3,465 ppb were obtained from grab and chip samples in the vicinity of line 1,100 west and 200 north. This
mineralization occurs within a sulphide replacement zone in magnetite iron formation.
SURVEY PARAMETERS AND PRESENTATION
Magnetometer Survey
A Scintrex MF-1 Fluxgate magnetometer was used to measure the vertical magnetic field (see instrument specifications Appendix I). Readings were
taken every 25 m along the grid lines on lake portions of the property and at
12.5 m intervals on land portions. The main target definition on the property was
iron formation, therefore, diurnal correction control was not required for this
property. Base stations were monitored three times a day, however, in the event
a major magnetic storm developed. Survey line separation was 100 m. A total of
approximately 170 line km of magnetic data were collected and plotted in the
field for preliminary evaluation. Subsequently, office compilation consisted of
entry of the data values on the field maps into the DMBW computer system. These values were then machine plotted using a plotting facility at Markham Data
Ltd. Survey maps were generated at a scale of 1:5,000 with appropriate title and
legend. The values were plotted on separate maps from the contours (Drawings
88-62-01 to 88-62-04).
DERRY, MICHENER. BOOTH ft WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
-4-
Electromagnetic Survey
The electromagnetic instrument was an Apex Parametrics Ltd. Max-Min II unit. Instrument specifications are contained in Appendix I. A coil spacing of
150 m was used for the survey with a station reading interval of 25 m. Survey lines were 100 m apart. Accurate leveling of the coils was monitored at each
station and correct coil distance was maintained using the picket line chainages. The in-phase and quadrature readings at frequencies of 444 Hz and 1,777 Hz were
measured at each station. A total of about 170 line km of two frequency data or
about 27,000 readings were collected on the property.
The values were plotted in the field for preliminary evaluation at a scale of 1:2,500. Subsequently, office compilation consisted of entry of the data values
on the field maps into the DMBW computer system. These values were then
machine-plotted using a plotting facility at Markham Data Ltd. Survey maps were generated at a scale of 1:5,000 with appropriate title and legend. The
in-phase and quadrature values are represented as solid and dashed profile lines,
respectively (Drawings 88-62-05 to 88-62-08 inclusive).
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Magnetic Survey
Within the main iron formation units that occur on the property, the magnetic amplitudes exceeded 5,000 nanotesla (nT). Lower values of 1,000 nT to
5,000 nT were recorded over narrow iron formation units. Other magnetically
anomalous trends, probably related to mafic flows and tuffs, having amplitudes of
250 nT to 1,000 nT are present throughout the claim block. The trend patterns
formed by these lower amplitude anomalies assist in identifying more subtle
structures related to folding and faulting.
Map 88-62-09 is an interpretive compilation of the magnetic trends and
shows what are thought to be the main iron formation horizons as well as the
lower amplitude magnetic trends. The major iron formation horizon starts at the
DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH ft WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
-5-
northwest corner of the claims and strikes east-southeast through Eden Lake. At
the east end of Eden Lake the formation forms an "S" fold with the top of the "S" showing a pronounced westerly plunge anomaly pattern. The bottom of the "S"
trends east-west but terminates at line 2,000 east. A possible sheared and/or
faulted portion of the horizon resumes a few hundred meters to the west. About
400 m to the south a second sub-parallel horizon is present. This horizon
terminates abruptly to the east, possibly fault bounded, and trends off the
property to the west. Examination of airborne magnetic data available from
assessment file information suggests that this southern unit folds back on itself to
join with the northern unit. The exact structural continuity of the iron formation
horizon is difficult to determine further to the west. Strike and cross faults have
produced a complex pattern. It is suggested, however, that the major high
amplitude magnetic horizons represent a single horizon folded on itself to form a
major synclinal structure with a plunge to the west. Within this syncline minor
parasitic "S" and "Z" folding is locally present.
Major cross-faulting patterns are apparent in the western part of the
north limb of the iron formation between lines 2,000 west and 3,500 west. Here
the flanks of the magnetic anomaly broaden abruptly suggesting a combination of increasing width and depth of burial. In this area iron formation outcrops on
islands in the lake. This suggests that a change in width and dip are producing the
broader anomalies rather than relative depth of burial.
The gold mineralization in iron formation, reported in the geology section
of this report, is coincident with an extensive high amplitude magnetic horizon
stretching from line 400 east to about line 1,500 west. A portion of this horizon is
conductive, to be discussed in the next section and probably represents the extent
of the sulphide alteration and potential gold mineralization in this area.
DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH ft WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
-6-
Eleetromagnetie Survey
The electromagnetic response is dominated by two types of conductive sources. The first is related to conductive lake bottom sediments which produce
edge effect anomalies along the shore of Eby Lake, especially at the east end of
the lake and in the middle of the lake. The second source is related to the iron
formation. Within the iron formation horizons there are conductive sulphide
and/or magnetic oxide phases. As just mentioned, if sulphides are present they
may be related to alteration processes and can be a harbinger of gold
mineralization.
The flat sheet-like conductive lake bottom sediments generally have a
specific electromagnetic signature having poor conductivity and anomaly profiles
very different from the typical near vertical bedrock conductor. In this situation
such conductors can be easily recognized by their in-phase and quadrature
response signatures. With the iron formation horizons, however, the
electromagnetic response can be complex as two opposite electromagnetic fields are operating. High concentrations of magnetite produce a susceptibility effect
that produces a positive in-phase response. On the other hand, a conductive
source such as massive sulphides or graphite, produce a typical negative in-phase
response with flanking positive shoulders. When an iron formation contains both sulphide and magnetite phases because of either natural facies changes or
alteration processes, the electromagnetic profile is distorted. Where the iron formation is in proximity to areas where conductive overburden effects are
present further anomaly distortion occurs making it difficult to correctly interpret conductive effects due to possible sulphides and other effects of no
interest. Collection of electromagnetic data at two different frequencies sometimes helps to resolve these difficulties.
There are several locations along the iron formation horizons where a
conductive response occurs coincident or nearly coincident with the magnetic response, indicating the possible presence of sulphides. Unfortunately, graphite,
which is often common in a sedimentary environment can also produce similar conductive effects if it occurs in close proximity to the iron formation.
DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH ft WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
-7-
Nevertheless, those portions of the interpreted iron formation that are conductive
are prime exploration targets.
The interpretive geophysical compilation map designates the conductive portions of the magnetic horizons as sulphide iron formation. As mentioned
previously, the gold mineralization already discovered on the property is associated with the iron formation horizon between lines 400 east and 1,500 west
just north of the baseline. The compilation map indicates that only the east part of this magnetic horizon is conductive. The gold mineralization occurs at the
west end of the conductive portion of the iron formation near an interpreted crosscutting fold/fault structure. Thus a major strike length of favourable iron
formation exists in this area.
Portions of several other iron formation horizons are also conductive. Of
most interest is an area between line 2,400 west and 3,400 west. Here, the highest conductivity response of the whole survey was recorded. Reconnaissance mapping and sampling discovered the presence of a highly altered pyrite iron
formation unit. No significant gold values were obtained from grab samples in
this area, however, only a very small portion of the horizon was sampled. Many of
the other favourable horizons on the property that occur in suboutcrop areas were not sampled because of time and budget limitations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The geophysical surveys have delineated several conductive and magnetic
iron formation horizons. Gold mineralization is known to be associated with one
of these horizons. Sampling of other portions of the iron formation has been very
limited to date. Therefore, it is recommended that a comprehensive and detailed mapping, sampling and stripping program, designed to explore the most favourable
iron formation horizons, be planned for the Bee Lake property. This work will
direct a follow-up drill program designed to test, at depth, targets defined by the
surface exploration work.
DERRY, MICHENER, BOOTH ft WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
-8-
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION
I, Roderick W. Woolham of the town of Pickering, Province of Ontario, do hereby certify that:-
1. I am a geophysicist and reside at 1463 Fieldlight Blvd., Pickering, Ontario, L1V 2S3.
2. I graduated from the University of Toronto in 1961 with a degree of Bachelor of Applied Science, Engineering Physics, Geophysics Option.
3. I am a member in good standing of the following organizations: The Association of Professional Engineers of the Province of Ontario (Mining Branch); Society of Exploration Geophysicists; South African Geophysical Association.
4. I have been practising my profession for a period of more than 25 years.
5. I am an Associate with Derry, Michener, Booth fc Wahl, Consulting Geologists and Engineers.
6. I have not received, nor do I expect to receive, any interest, directly or indirectly, in the properties or securities of Gandy Resources Corp. or any affiliate.
7. I personally was involved with the technical supervision of the survey and wrote the report.
8. I consent to the use of this report in submissions for assessment credits and for similar regulatory requirements.
Toronto, Ontario June 17, 1988
DERRY, MICHENER. BOOTH ft WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
APPENDIX I
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
DERRY, MICHENER. BOOTH a WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
i,.
i.
1. Range Switch
2. Meter3. Main Switch
4. Level
5. Battery Pack
6. Battery Connector
7. Silica Gel
8. Protection Cap
9. Latitude Adjustment Control Fine
10. Latitude Adjustment Control Coarse
11. Carrying Strap
MODEL MF-1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER
SHARPE INSTRUMENTS
a division of .
G l N T R E X L T M l T E D
7* MARTIN ft O * b AVI., DOWNIVICW. ONTARIO
Ii
*:
l
l
i
i
.ifi^'-."."-'
y.' i r
i ii i i i
i|
i
-l
l * J^* f * " '.i^jf^iy'* *W- #* M"
MODEL MF-1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETEROperation of the M*t*r1.) Remove all magnetic objects from operator's person, e.g. keys, coins, buttons, etc.
Zippers should be non-magnetic.2.) C onnect Battery Cable, Figure 6, to magnetometer receptacle on bottom of main hous
ing. This connection must be secured by lock-ring.3.) Attach battery pack (Fig.S) either in back pocket or on belt behind operator.4.) Switch on Main Switch (Fig. 3) to iirst position, which is the battery check. Indicating
meter needle should rest within red arc. Replace batteries if reading below red arc.5.)LatitudeA3justnent -To adjust the latitude setting to read O gammas is a simple operation.
a. After indicating meter needle (f ig.2) shows voltage okay, switch Main Switch (Fig.3) to next position which is the positive reading with the Range Switch (Fig. 1) set at the 100K step. (100,000 gamma range)
b.If needle goes full arc to left past O, switch main switch (Fig. 3) to last position which is the negative reading range.
c. Figures 10 am! 9 indicate the latitude adjustment controls - Coarse control is Fig. 10 and Fine control is Fig. 9. If scale reading is mote than 17,000 gammas rotate coarse control (Fig. 10) in steps of 7,000 and switch range down to more sensitive range until scale is reading less than * 7,000 gammas. Remove protection cap on fine control (Fig. 8) by pulling straight off. Then rotate fine control switch (Fig. 9) until scale reading Is O gammas. Check reading by switching main switch from positive to negative (or vice versa) to ensure O reading both polarities. Replace fine control protection cap.
6.) Calibration -This meter is calibrated at the factory prior to delivery. Field tests show that only by severe misuse (i.e. constant dropping, rough handling, improper shipping)
can the calibration of this instrument be effected. It is therefore not necessary to re calibrate in the field and if through Misuse calibration becomes necessary, the meter should be returned to the factory. 'All parts are guaranteed against defect for a period of one year and will be replaced free of charge.
This guarantee does not apply to batteries or the connecting cable.7.) Trouble Shooting - Under normal conditions the only field problem will be batteries or
the connecting cable. 11 alter completion of step (4) under "Operation of the Meter" the meter still does not indicate voltage, check cable for faulty connection or broken cable. If after this procedure, meter still does not indicate current, teturn unit immedi ately to your supplier or directly to the factory.
Regional Latitude SettingsNormally each unit is pre-set at the factoiy for the Northern Hemisphere. However, if the unit is required for Equatorial or Southern Hemispheric regions, the unit will be pre-set at the factory for these areas. If a unit is going from one of the above regions to another, reset instructions will be supplied on request.Field Procedure1.) Select Base Control station. This station should be selected in relation to one or
both of two things.1. General magnetic background (i.e. not anomalous) if possible. l. Accessibility-in relation to area being surveyed.
2.) Set magnetometer to read between O and 200 gammas.(For contouring and to avoid small negative readings, an arbitrary value of 1000-800 gammas should be added to allreadings.
3.) For effective diurnal control, control stations should be permanently marked and read ings should be taken at the same height and location each time; a simple method is to have the control stations' pickets hammered into the ground with the top about waist height. Rest the probe end of the magnetometer on the top of the picket. In barren country,a mound or large piece of rock or some other material should be used.
4.) Continue survey the same as any other method of magnetic surveying.5.) Remove and replace Silica-Gel (Fig.7) when deteriorated. The silica gel is located
in the removable probe housing. The Silica bag should not be placed on the bottom of the probe housing.
6.) Do not pass powerful magnet closer than l foot to instrument.7.) During winter operation, batteries should be kept in pocket or under parka. Warning: - Do not leave batteries in battery case when unit is being stored. Always be
be sure meter is turned elf after use. Disconnect battery cable when meter not in use.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
MAXMIN II
SPECIFICATIONS :
Frequencies: 222, 444, BBS, 1777 and 3555 Hz. Repeatability:
Modes of Operation: MAX: Transmitter coil plane and re ceiver coil plane horizontal C Max-coupled; Horizontal-loop mode). Used with refer.cable.
M l N: Transmitter coil plane horizon tal and receiver coil plane ver tical CMin-coupled mode). Used with reference cable.
V. L. : Transmitter coil plane verti cal and receiver coil plane hori zontal (Vertical-loop mode). Used without reference cable , in parallel lines.
25,50,100,150,200 a25Om CMMB) or 1OO, 2OO, 3OO, 4OO.6OO end BOO ft. C MM H F ) . Coil separations in VL.mode not re stricted to fixed velues.
Vo to f\'/, normally, depending on conditions, frequencies and coil separation used.
Transmitter Output i - 222Hz : 175A6ma- 444HZ : 16OAtma- aSS Hz : 1COAtnn2- 1777 Hz : SOAtma-3555 Hz: 3OAtma
Coll Separations:
Parameters Read: -
Readouts:
Scale Ranges :
Readability:
In-Phase and Quadrature compo nents of the secondary field i n MAX and M IN modes.
Tilt-angle of the totel field in V.L. mode .
- Automatic, direct readout on 9Omm C3.5") edgewise meters in MAX and MIN modes. No null ing or compensation necessary.
- Tilt angle end null in 9Omm edge wise meters in VL.mode .
In-Phase: 2Oy., 1OOV. by push button switch .
Quadrature: S2O'/., 1OO V. by push button switch .
9V trans, radio type batteries (4). Life: approx. 35hrs. continuous du ty (alkaline, O.5 Ah), less in cold weather.
12V7.5Ah Gel-Cell rechargeable batteries C S x 6V in series).
Lightweight 2-conductor teflon cable for minimum friction. Unshield ed. All reference cables optional at extra cost. Please specify.
Built-in intercom system for voice communication between re ceiver and transmitter operators in MAX and MIN modes, vis re ference cable .
Built-in signal and reference warn ing lights to indicate erroneous readings .
-4O"C to+SO'C C-4O"Fto*14O'F).
6kg C13lbs.)
13kg (29lbs.)
Typically SOkg C135lbs.), depend ing on quantities of reference cable and batteries included. Shipped in two field/shipping cases.
Specifications subject to change without notification.
l A
l
PAHAMETP3CS LIMITED2OO STEELCASE RD. E.. MARKHAM, ONT. CANADA, L3R 1G2
Phone: C 416) 495-1612 Cables: APEXPARA TORONTO Telex : OS-966773 NORDVIK TOR
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
APPENDIX H
TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
DERRY. MICHENER. BOOTH St WAHL
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
l l
rOntario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s)
Tonrnchip or A*-~-
Claim HnlHer(s)
g.cf
V? g S e S.
fi i' (Qg. U
Author of Report
Address
. UJ oouMAM
Covering Dates of Survey 3u*faVJt*l*y S7. Fe^(linecutting to office)
Total Mitoe-of Line Hut l
g 8
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
Electromagnetic.
DAYS per claim
1.0
-Other-
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne lurveyi)
Magnetometer -Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter dayt per claim)
; Ju^e 17 /g g SIGNATURE:ior of Report or Agent
Res. Geol.. . Qualificationsfa*
Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(number) l \
i
TOTAL CLAIMS.
LxL
ftt1^-C
rB__
i1ii
i
i i i
l \
K-....S S i..!LTo . .. .-...X-*:VS\33.1...__^
l( ^Siooo
Tt
....3^lS20^..
If
t,_____ l-J3SZQ.(o.(.
IND
UC
ED
PO
LA
RIZ
AT
IOE
LE
CT
RO
MA
GN
ET
ICJK
.JC.O
lO 1
i V
1 1
I
— —
—
——
— " —
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
—
——
——
——
——
——
(-1
*T
J tt
) "7
^
E
\ l
2- 1
rt n M o s
tt.
" rt
(K3 E r r
f ^ C
1. C
( fi ! ' l.
-*
} 3
[1 L. t 3 1 [ l
d ! i
1 5s o
c*
f
-*U*
i™*-
iS'
3"
D
rtr* 3"
n
H E D M r r e * b
D C
5
5r.
i
Method
D
Time
Domain D55
^J
^3
g S
S,jg
,o
,rs
n
C
Crt
rt 3
3O
0
x:
^ 0
o 2.
r i
I S i j i i *^2 r 5 * 5' 19 ] •i ^ 1 ^
Base station value and
location
.
i r r r C 1 c 1M l i
5 :
2 1
3 J
a. T
W
t II ID *
•*
r0 3 •*
-4
^
3 S
l l
3 J
l l f ' i 1 i i?
r M J v
3 o 1 5 t X
M S. •5" r w s* 1r ! i
5 S
" S
: o
"5
S- f
5 v
V
a x' ft a. ^ 3 nsmitter D o o cr
p S- D 3* 5" rt D ? 2L ?r 5"
n li ** f t r i?. S
-j
*- i l l J r j ii i H 5 j -* 5" 1 i > t (V E L ^ H
•M*
A -* | 3 T i ^ —— Z
Accuracy — Scale
constant ——
Diurnal
correction
method
——— Base
Station
check-in
interval
(h
Base
Station
location
and
value
.
o c wJV 6 S K* 1 it ri
(•^
k
r i
1 i
•* * i
[y
L
^y\ 1* t x *. 1\ — Tl A > C A
S S
2 5 i S. i ^ ' o jr -}
M q .
r i
I 5' r* 5 i/ 0
[j t -c k fj ^\ •p ^ f *\
5 -** a -f 3 n * A 0 O x s . OR o 0 •7.
r l ut cr
•0
rtCt
) *^
t
Q.
o^OQ
5g
— 9-
0 J'
0 "
i,
,f JO 0 0 T: 5 -
N M
-N
—
0 0
O ROUND
SURVEYS - If
more th p s S o
n pj
1 S
* S
^
^*
^5
Vi
tn
A•O
O
B. r
^
Ha.
PJ
R Q
p X
o1
j-"^
Oo
r1 ^
o•5
^H3
*"
^rs
J^O vt C i 4 \
jMinistryof Natyra! Resources
Ontvio52L10NWe803 2.t 1369 EAGLE LAKE
Report of Work i DOCUMENTN
(Geophysical, Geological, J W8801' l VO Geochemical and Expenditures)
900
Type of S urveyd)
Mqg-vY-H&'VicTownship or Area t-.f)fZ
ProspectoriiUlcence No.
rClaim HotdJr(s)
T^H-5toO-
Address
rincon ADate of Survey (from ft to)
VVSHSurvey Company
Name and Aidress of Author (of GeO-Technical report)ts.2.2- . Ot. tt .Day | Mo. | Yr. \ Day | Mo. | Yr.
Total-WTTW of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total (d^iet* f* r
JUl
MIKING Ul
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
I v^1Wagnetlc- Magnetometer
7 I98^mstric- Other
U&JiEGTION
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Oayt per Claim
40
2X3
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type, of Work Performed
Performed on Clalm(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Oayt Credit!
Total Expenditures
S 4-15
Total Days Credit!
"d
Instructions Total Deyi Credit! may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credit! per claim selected in columns at right.
E N O R AMINING DIV.
3 9? Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
Oat Recorded t (Signature)
rtification Verifying Repcffof Workl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the fact* let forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work Of w itnessed same during and/or after in completion and the annexed report li true.
Nema and Poitel Addreu of Penon Certifying
h 4to Si, E^ USC.tlf led (Signature)
Ministry ofNorthern Development
Ontario"W Technical Assessment
Work CreditsDate
August 15. 1988
File 2.11369
Mining Recorder'1 Report of Work W W880 1-168
Recorded Holder
Gandy Resources CorporationXJWWOXKXr Area
Rickaby and Eagle Lake
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical 40
Electromagnetic Ha ys
Magnetometer days
Induced polarization days
Other day*
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
Geological rfays
Geofihpmir.fll Hays
Man days | | Airborne [~l
Special provision [x] Ground 0
l | Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
f"! Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
K 951398 to 400 inclusive 951451 to 58 inclusive 951476 to 81 inclusive 951492 to 95 inclusive 951498 to 501 inclusive 951972 to 85 inclusive 951987 to 99 inclusive 952000 to 006 inclusive 952011 to 15 inclusive 952017 to 27 inclusive 952029 to 33 inclusive 952050 to 67 inclusive 952069
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining ci aim t
10 days 20 days
K 951986 K 951496952007952016
30 days
K 951497952010952028952068
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
not sufficiently covered by the survey
K-951970-71
insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
Ministry ofNorthern Development
Technical Assessment Work Credits
OntarioDate
August 15. 1988
File
2.11369Mining Recorder's Report of Work No.
W8801-168
Recorded Holder
TWWOMWXvt Area
Gandy Resources Corporation
Rickaby and Eagle Lake
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Pleetromagnetir
Magnetometer
RfldjOTV?trir
Induced polarization
Othpr
Section 77 (19) See"
Geological
Geocheminal
Man days j |
Special provision Q{j
ria y s
20days
rlaye
day?
days
Mining Claims Assessed" column
Hays
riays
Airborne (~1
Ground [jfj
1 l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
}O 38 days
K 951496 952016
days
K 951497 951986 952010 952028 952068
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
l l not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
828 (85/12)
C l
^o^U. UL* CLr^ 0^s
DOCUMENT No.
W8801- /^^
Kqs\
452
^80
^51 4:80
HSiooo
'^ AS2.0 M
•' ^5202.1
* ^52022.
OS2
August 31, 1988 Your Filei Our File i
W8801-168 2.11369
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines808 Robertson StreetBox 5200Kenora, OntarioP9N 3X9
Dear Sirt
ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEYASSESSMENT FILES
l OFFICE
;,' SFP T 3 1988
RE c e iv E DRE: Notice of Intent dated August 15, 1988
Electromagnetic and Magnetometer Survey submitted on Mining Claims K 951398 et al in the Areas of Eagle and Rickaby Lake.
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
NOTE: M INING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY 6. 1913, VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. H.S.O. 197O. CHAP 380. S EC. 63, S UBSEC 1.
REFE R ENCESAREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
M.R.O. -MINING RIGHTS ONLY
S.R.O. -SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
M.-f S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS
Description Order No. Date Disposition File•"~"~~~V; -NORA: ! . rs,;J3 D IV.
SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS
O l DOG 2OCX) 4OOO 6OOO SOOO
O 2OOMETRES
1OOQi KM;
2000(2 KM
AREA
EAGLE LAKEM.N.R. ADMINISTRATE DISTRICT
KENORAMINING DIVISION
KENORA/RED LAKELAND T ITLES/ R EGISTRY DIVISION
KENORA ( PATRICIA PORTION)
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Land
Management
Branch
Ontario
Diti FEBRUARY t 1984 Numbtr
G-2615
.r ri-aar nrm-" j
- l 7 f O i f c- v
l /"v-
IZ457 , 10(2458
012443 101248^ ' | 01246I
'lOIZ459 '?OI2476 1*1012477 | K) 12365
!OI2475 ' IOI2478 1012366
_ J_I \ K ^' \ 1012379
l 1012474 l 1012479 [10123*7 1012377 , IOI2MO
K f "s " ~*~~ u lit r—
,iK ' , K v l K,'- l
1 1012394 t 10(2400 ^ Ml240fi
, r\. j^e^-rfv i
y
i ioi2453 Vc.2462 ^ 71 [ ^^ - r^^**^ , * lr-^~, i;' F
j K IK ' x* ~, 1 012445 f 1012452 ^12382^012392
f- ^
ICHZ482 110(2370 1(X2374 1012383 i 1012391 | 1012397K K