Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 18, 2012
Mar 26, 2015
Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students
Willard R. Daggett, CEOJanuary 18, 2012
Point of Departure
•Common Core State Standards
Point of Departure
•Common Core State Standards
•Next Generation Assessments
Point of Departure
•Common Core State Standards
•Next Generation Assessments
•Teacher Evaluation
School Improvement
Schools are Improving
Schools are Improving
School Improvement
Changing World
Skills Gap
School Improvement
Changing World
Schools are Improving
School Improvement
Changing World
Schools are Improving
School
Impro
vement
Changing World
Schools are Improving
WHY – WHAT - HOW
What Works
RESEARCH
MODELSCHOOLS
ACTION PLAN
BEST PRACTICES
STRUCTURE
Focus
•What is effective?
Research on Effectiveness• Data-rich, analysis-poor
– 52,637
Research on Effectiveness• Data-rich, analysis-poor
– Meta-analysis
Research on Effectiveness• Data-rich, analysis-poor
– Meta-analysis
• Visible Learning by John Hattie– 52,637– 800 meta-analyses
Research on Effectiveness• Data-rich, analysis-poor
– Meta-analysis
• Visible Learning by John Hattie– 52,637– 800 meta-analyses
Focus
•What is effective?
Focus
•What is effective?•What is most efficient?
Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework
High
Cost
Low
Cost
Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework
High
Cost
Low
Cost
High Student Performance
Low Student Performance
EEffffeeccttiivveenneessss
Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework
High Cost
Low Cost
High Student Performance
Low Student Performance
CC DD
AA BB
EEffffeeccttiivveenneessss
Application of Knowledge
0.65
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.80
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Effective Efficient
Student Teacher Relationship
0.72
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.90
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Effective Efficient
Teacher Expectations and Clarity
0.75
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.90
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Effective Efficient
Literacy Strategies
0.61
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.65
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Effective Efficient
0.7
2
0.9
0
0.6
2
0.7
5
0.4
0
0.6
7
0.9
0
0.6
0
0.7
5
0.9
0
0.6
9
0.8
0
0.6
0 0.6
5
0.5
5
0.7
5
0.2
1
0.2
0
0.3
00
.55
0.2
2
0.9
0
0.2
3
0.2
0
Stu
den t
Teach
e r
PD
Pri
or
Ach
iev e
Form
.
Eva
l.
Teach
e r
Cla
rity
Meta
Str
ats
.
Lit
era
c y
Str
ats
.P
eer
Tu
tor
Cla
ss
Siz
e
Ab
ilit
y
Gro
up
Teach
Test
Su
mm
e r
Sch
ool
Greatest Impact
• Culture of High Expectations• Relevance of Instruction• Strong Relationships• System-wide Focus on Literacy• Focused and Sustained PD
What Works
RESEARCH
School
Impro
vement
Changing World
Schools are Improving
What Works
RESEARCHMODEL
SCHOOLS
What Works
RESEARCHMODEL
SCHOOLSSTRUCTURE
What Works
RESEARCHMODEL
SCHOOLS
BEST PRACTICES
STRUCTURE
What Works
RESEARCHMODEL
SCHOOLS
ACTION PLAN
BEST PRACTICES
STRUCTURE
WHY – WHAT - HOW
WHY
Teacher Expectations and Clarity
0.75
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.90
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Effective Efficient
Literacy Strategies
0.61
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.65
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Effective Efficient
Reading Study Summary
600
800
1000
1400
1600
1200
Tex
t L
exil
e M
easu
re (
L)
HighSchool
Literature
CollegeLiterature
HighSchool
Textbooks
CollegeTextbooks
Military PersonalUse
Entry-LevelOccupations
SAT 1,ACT,AP*
* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics
Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)
2005 Proficiency2005 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Mississippi 88 %
Georgia 87 %
Wisconsin 83 %
Texas 81 %
Ohio 77 %
Florida 71%
Arkansas 53 %
Massachusetts 48 %
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Georgia 87 %
Texas 84 %
Ohio 82 %
Wisconsin 82 %
Florida 74%
Arkansas 70 %
Massachusetts 54 %
Mississippi 52 %
2005 Proficiency2005 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Mississippi 88 % 161
Georgia 87 % 175
Wisconsin 83 % 189
Texas 81 % 190
Ohio 77 % 199
Florida 71% 202
Arkansas 53 % 217
Massachusetts 48 % 234
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Georgia 87 % 178
Texas 84 % 188
Ohio 82 % 192
Wisconsin 82 % 189
Florida 74% 206
Arkansas 70 % 200
Massachusetts 54 % 234
Mississippi 52 % 210
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Georgia 87 % (0) 178 (+3)
Texas 84 % (+3) 188 (-2)
Ohio 82 % (+5) 192 (-7)
Wisconsin 82 % (-1) 189 (0)
Florida 74% (+3) 206 (+4)
Arkansas 70 % (+17) 200 (-17)
Massachusetts 54 % (+6) 234 (0)
Mississippi 52 % (-36) 210 (+49)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 ReadingGrade 8 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 94 % (+11) 201 (-24)
Wisconsin 85 % (-1) 232 (+3)
Georgia 77 % (-6) 209 (-15)
Ohio 72 % (-8) 251 (+10)
Arkansas 71 % (+14) 241 (-13)
Florida 54 % (+10) 262 (-3)
Mississippi 48 % (-10) 254 (+7)
California 48 % (+9) 259 (-3)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 MathematicsGrade 4 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 85 % (+3) 214 (-5)
Wisconsin 81 % (+7) 219 (-6)
Mississippi 58 % (-21) 223 (+17)
Georgia 75 % (0) 218 (+3)
Ohio 78 % (+13) 219 (-14)
Florida 75 % (+12) 225 (-5)
Arkansas 78 % (+25) 216 (-20)
Massachusetts 48 % (+9) 255 (0)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 MathematicsGrade 8 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 83 % (+22) 254 (-19)
Georgia 81 % (+12) 247 (-8)
Wisconsin 79 % (+4) 262 (-1)
Florida 66 % (+8) 266 (-3)
Ohio 59 % (+8) 269 (-9)
Arkansas 61 % (+27) 267 (-21)
Mississippi 54 % (+1) 264 (+2)
Massachusetts 49 % (+7) 300 (-1)
Application of Knowledge
0.65
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.80
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Effective Efficient
Application Model1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world predictable
situations5. Application to real-world unpredictable
situations
The Changing Landscape
• Technology
Semantic Web
• Analyze Documents—Key words and headers (Google)
• Meaning / Concepts—Wolfram Alpha
• Complete Task
Implications Homework Term Paper
-Wolfram Alpha-
• Will search all language and give you response in your language
• Will respond in writing or verbally (in your language)
SPOTSPOT
• Integrated ProjectionIntegrated Projection• Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard
Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard
Projection Keyboard and ProjectorProjection Keyboard and Projector
Consumer Electronics Confernce
Contacts Chips in devices to external
to devices Medical examples
The Changing Landscape
• Technology• Financial
2011 US Federal Budget2011 US Federal Budget
-borrowing 41% of -borrowing 41% of every dollar it is every dollar it is
spending spending
The Changing Landscape
• Technology• Financial• Globalization
Equityand
Excellence
Wal Mart• Largest Corporation
• 8 times Size of Microsoft
• 2 % of GDP
• 1.4 Million Employees
• More Employees than:
— GM, Ford, G.E. and IBM Combined
“China today exports in a single day more than it exported in all of 1978.”
Source: The Rise of India and China . . .
U.S. – 2nd Half of 20th Century•Only Superpower•Highest per Capita Income•1st in Economic Growth•5% of Population > 24% of Consumption
Source: National Academy of Science
The Changing Landscape
• Technology• Financial• Globalization• Demographics
Population
FemaleMale
1950
2010
2050
Our Changing World
1970 - 60 %1980 - 50 %2010 - 43 %
College Degrees to Men
Our Changing World
Women = 44 %
Men = 6 %
Growth in Earnings in Real Dollars
(1970-2010)
Our Changing World
2010 - 40 %2011 - 43 %
Out of Wedlock Birthrate
Our Changing World
2010
Women - 47 %Men - 39 %
Attend Church Regularly
“Today, 18 to 34 year-old men spend more time
playing video games a day than do 12 to 17 year-old boys.”
“The End of Men”
-Hanna Rosin
The 20th Century American Education System was NOT
Designed to Prepare Students for the 21st Century
why – WHAT - how
Common Core State Standards
• Fewer• Clearer• Higher
Reading Study Summary
600
800
1000
1400
1600
1200
Tex
t L
exil
e M
easu
re (
L)
HighSchool
Literature
CollegeLiterature
HighSchool
Textbooks
CollegeTextbooks
Military PersonalUse
Entry-LevelOccupations
SAT 1,ACT,AP*
* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics
Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Georgia 87 % (0) 178 (+3)
Texas 84 % (+3) 188 (-2)
Ohio 82 % (+5) 192 (-7)
Wisconsin 82 % (-1) 189 (0)
Florida 74% (+3) 206 (+4)
Arkansas 70 % (+17) 200 (-17)
Massachusetts 54 % (+6) 234 (0)
Mississippi 52 % (-36) 210 (+49)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 ReadingGrade 8 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 94 % (+11) 201 (-24)
Wisconsin 85 % (-1) 232 (+3)
Georgia 77 % (-6) 209 (-15)
Ohio 72 % (-8) 251 (+10)
Arkansas 71 % (+14) 241 (-13)
Florida 54 % (+10) 262 (-3)
Mississippi 48 % (-10) 254 (+7)
California 48 % (+9) 259 (-3)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 MathematicsGrade 4 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 85 % (+3) 214 (-5)
Wisconsin 81 % (+7) 219 (-16)
Mississippi 58 % (-21) 223 (+17)
Georgia 75 % (0) 218 (+3)
Ohio 78 % (+13) 219 (-14)
Florida 75 % (+12) 225 (-5)
Arkansas 78 % (+25) 216 (-20)
Massachusetts 48 % (+9) 255 (0)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 MathematicsGrade 8 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 83 % (+22) 254 (-19)
Georgia 81 % (+12) 247 (-8)
Wisconsin 79 % (+4) 262 (-1)
Florida 66 % (+8) 266 (-3)
Ohio 59 % (+8) 269 (-9)
Arkansas 61 % (+27) 267 (-21)
Mississippi 54 % (+1) 264 (+2)
Massachusetts 49 % (+7) 300 (-1)
Common Core State Standards
• Fewer• Clearer• Higher• Different
Application Model1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world predictable
situations5. Application to real-world unpredictable
situations
Where are the JobsNon-Routine
Routine• Rules Driven• Problem Solving• Less Innovation/Creativity• Less People Intensive• Business Operations
• Results Driven• Decision Making• More Innovation / Creativity• More People Intensive• Business Development
1980 2011
Where are the Jobs
• Write an Algorithm• Can be Digitized• Can be Outsourced
• Cannot Write an Algorithm• Cannot be Digitized• Cannot be Outsourced
1980 2011
Non-Routine
Routine
Knowledge Taxonomy1. Awareness2. Comprehension 3. Application4. Analysis5. Synthesis 6. Evaluation
Application Model1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world predictable
situations5. Application to real-world unpredictable
situations
1 2 3 4 5
Bloom’sBloom’s
CC DD
AA BB
456
321
ApplicationApplication
Levels
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC
Rigor/Relevance Framework
• Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals.
• Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides.
• Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes.
• Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.
• Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.
• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.
• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.
• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.
• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.
• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.
• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.
• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.
• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.
• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.
• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram
• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC• Analyze the graphs of the
perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.
• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.
• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.
• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.
• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.
• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.
• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.
• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.
• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.
• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.
• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram
• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.
•Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals.
•Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides.
•Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes.
•Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.
Rigor/Relevance Framework
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC• Express probabilities as fractions,
percents, or decimals.• Classify triangles according to angle
size and/or length of sides.• Calculate volume of simple three-
dimensional shapes.• Given the coordinates of a
quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.
• Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.
• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.
• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.
• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.
• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.
• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.
• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.
• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.
• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.
• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.
• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram.
• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.
Rigor/Relevance Framework
1 2 3 4 5
Bloom’sBloom’s
CC DD
AA BB
456
321
ApplicationApplication
Levels
1
2
3
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC
• Calculate with numbers, including decimals, ratios, percents, and fractions.
• Understand two-dimensional motion and trajectories by separating the motion of an object into x and y components.
Rigor/Relevance Framework
1
2
3
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC
• Know the characteristics and phenomena of sound waves and light waves.
• Understand the effect of sounds, words, and imagery on a listening audience.
Rigor/Relevance Framework
Quad DSkills and Knowledge
• Decision Making• Innovation/Creativity • Goal Setting/Results Driven• Multi Tasking• Work with others
why – what - HOW
AA BB
DDCC
Next Navigator
1 2 3 4 5
Road Map
• State Standards to State Test
Wisconsin English LA Achievement Frameworks Subskills/Descriptors
Knowledge and Concepts Exam - CRT (WKCE) High Medium Low Grade 3 4 3 11 Grade 4 4 3 11 Grade 5 3 1 14 Grade 6 5 5 8 Grade 7 4 6 8 Grade 8 6 4 8 Grade 9 3 7 8
Grade 10 4 6 8 Grade 11 4 6 8 Grade 12 4 5 9
StateTests
StateStandards
AA
AA
Road Map
• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research
National Essential Skills Study (NESS)
NESS StudySubgroup Rankings
ELA Skill: Write clear and concise directions or procedures.
Group Rank
Overall 9
Business/Industry 2
Other Non-educators 10
English Language Arts Teachers 25
Other Educators 8
NESS StudySubgroup Rankings
ELA Skill: Give clear and concise oral directions.
Group Rank
Overall 7
Business/Industry 3
Other Non-educators 9
English Language Arts Teachers 28
Other Educators 7
NESS StudySubgroup Rankings
Math Skill: Apply the Pythagorean Theorem to right triangles.
Group Rank
Overall 20
Business/Industry 29
Other Non-educators 31
Mathematics Teachers 4
Other Educators 24
NESS StudySubgroup Rankings
Math Skill: Understand accuracy and precision of measurement, round off numbers according to the correct number of significant figures, and determine percent error.
Group Rank
Overall 12
Business/Industry 3
Other Non-educators 10
Mathematics Teachers 30
Other Educators 8
Proficiency
Reading Study Summary
600
800
1000
1400
1600
1200
Tex
t L
exil
e M
easu
re (
L)
HighSchool
Literature
CollegeLiterature
HighSchool
Textbooks
CollegeTextbooks
Military PersonalUse
Entry-LevelOccupations
SAT 1,ACT,AP*
* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics
Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)
NESS &
Lexile
StateTests
StateStandards
CC
AA CC
CommonCore
Standards
NESS&
Lexile
StateTests
StateStandards
CCAA
Wisconsin Standards CCSS
CCSS Wisconsin Standards
Road Map
• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research• State Standards to CCSS• CCSS to State Standard
Road Map
• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research• State Standards to CCSS• CCSS to State Standard• State Test to CCSS• Samples to NGA
Road Map
• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research• State Standards to CCSS• CCSS to State Standard• State Test to CCSS• Samples to NGA
State Test NGACreate a large spinner for a game that has at least eight sectors. Each sector should be assigned a different ‘prize’. Prizes should range in value from most appealing to least appealing.
Vary the sectors so that the probability to win a desired prize is much less that the probability to win a lesser desired prize. Calculate the theoretical probability of landing on each prize.
Conduct multiple trials with the spinner and determine the experimental probability of landing on each prize. Which price has the greatest probability and which prize has the least probability?
CommonCore
Standards
NESS&
Lexile
StateTests
StateStandards
ConsortiumAssessment
DDAA
Road Map
• State Standards to State Test• State Standards to Research• State Standards to CCSS• CCSS to State Standard• State Test to CCSS• Samples to NGA• NGA to CCSS
1 2 3 4 5
AA BB
DDCC
Gold Seal Lessons