8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
1/44
BS Information Technology
Angelica M. Aquino
School of Computer Studies and Technology
Research Ethics
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
2/44
DO
YOU
VALUE
Things?
Research Ethics
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
3/44
TOPIC OUTLINE:
Definition of Research Ethics
Why study research ethics
Research Participants
Ethical Principles
Cases involving ethical rules
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
4/44
Researchis defined as any form of disciplinedinquiry that aims to contribute to
a body of knowledge or theory.
Research is a social activity.
Research ethics refers to the moral principles
guiding research from its inception through to itscompletion and publication of results andbeyond.
Research and Research Ethics
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
5/44
Research design
It is an ethical behaviourfor aresearcher
to use resources efficiently andeffectively
to work hard to ensure the well-being of all
colleagues and participants
5
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
6/44
Individualsfrom whom the researcher may
obtain data.
Through interaction (e.g., surveys)
Identifiable private information (e.g.,student records)
Effective and ethical relationships
will aid to make more rapid progress
on the project
Research Participants
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
7/44
Ethics is defined as the norms for conductthat
distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable
behavior.
Ethics in research is actually the application of
ethical principles to a variety of topics involving
research.
These include the design and implementation of research
Ethics in Research
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
8/44
Is the application of fundamental principlestoa variety of topics involving research.
provides guidelinesfor the responsible conductof research.
Educates and monitors the conduct of
researchto ensure high ethical standard.
Definition of Research Ethics
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
9/44
Why have ethical standards?
Protect rights and welfare of participants
Ensure accuracy of scientific knowledge
Protect intellectual rights
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
10/44
Where do standards come from?
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects
Professional organization
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
11/44
Knowing what constitutes ethical research is
important for all people who conduct research
projects.
All researchers should be familiar with the basicethical principles and have up-to-date knowledge
about policies and procedures designed. WHY?..
to ensu re the safety o f research subjects
and to p revent sloppy o r ir responsible research
Why study research ethics
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
12/44
public trust and upright
Research is a public trustthat must be
ethically conducted, trustworthy, and socially
responsible if the results are to be valuable.
All parts of a research projectfrom the
project design to submission of the results for
peer reviewhave to be upright (respectable)
in order to be considered ethical.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
13/44
Reasons why to adhere to ethical
norms in research
Norms promote the aims of research, such as
knowledge, truth, and avoidance of error.
For example, prohibitions against fabricating,
falsifying, or misrepresenting research data
promote the truth and avoidance error.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
14/44
Reasons why to adhere to ethical
norms in research
promote thevaluesthat are essential to collaborativeworksince research often involves a great deal ofcooperation and coordination among many differentpeople in different disciplines and institutions
For example, many ethical norms in research, such asguidelines for authorship, copyright policies, andconfidentiality rules in peer review, are designed to protectintellectual property interests while encouragingcollaboration.
Most researchers want to receive credit for theircontributions and do not want to have their ideas stolen.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
15/44
Authorship
Authorship credit should the individualscontribution to the study.
Author is anyone involved in the research studywith: Initial research design
Data collection and analysis
Manuscript drafting
Final approval
However, the following do not qualify: Providing funds or resources
Mentorship
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
16/44
Research Ethics PRINCIPLES
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
17/44
CONSENTPermission/ approval
HARMMisbehaviour/safety
DECEPTIONdishonesty
PRIVACYSecrecy/confidentiality
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
18/44
There are ethical principles that should be taken into
account when performing research.
PRINCIPLE ONE: Minimize the risk of harm
PRINCIPLE TWO: Obtain informed consent
PRINCIPLE THREE: Protect confidentiality or privacy
PRINCIPLE FOUR: Avoid deceptivepractices
Principles of Research Ethics
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
19/44
ObtainInformedconsent from potential research participants. means that participants should understand that they are taking part
in research and what the research requires of them.
When in doubt, ask for permission
Consent should always be obtained in writing Elements:
Capacity Ability: individual is competent enough to understand, evaluate, and make a
decision of whether to participate or not
Age
Information Is it complete/comprehensive and fully understood?
Voluntariness Subjects have the choice to participate or withdraw and are aware of this choice
CONSENT
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
20/44
Informed Consent
TO OBTAIN INFORMED CONSENT YOU NEED TOPROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TO THE PARTICIPANTS:
Discuss to them thepurpose of research
What they will be doing and for how long Offer to withdraw at any time for any reason
Potential benefits to participants
Harm or risk of discomfort How privacy will be protected
Instructions on how to get copy of results
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
21/44
The process of obtaining consent
1. Identify participant population
2. Produce information sheet and consent document
3. Obtain permission
4. Present research information to participant and discussits contentsindicating that withdrawal at any time is
possible
5. Answer participants questions
6. Give a copy of the consent document
7. Allow the participant time to consider
8. Meet participant and discuss documents, to answer any
more questions and assess participants understanding
9. Obtain appropriate signed consent
10. Start research
21
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
22/44
I have read the Information Sheet and have had the
details of the study explained to me. My questions
have been answered to my satisfaction, and I may
ask further questions at any time.
I understand I have the right to withdraw from the
study at any time and decline to answer any
particular questions.
I agree to provide information to the researcher(s)
on the understanding that my name will not be used
without my permission.
I agree/do not agree to the interview being recorded
electronically.
I understand that I have the right to ask for the tape
to be turned off at any time during the interview
I agree to participate in this study under the
conditions set out in the information sheet
SignatureName - Date
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
23/44
Minimize the risk of harm.
Any research should not harm participants.
Subjects must be protected from harm, or at the least fully
informed about the potential costs and benefits resulting
from.
Research that is physicallyor psychologicallydangerous is
generally considered unethical
It is not harm that you need to think about since a researcher
does not intentionally go out to cause harm. Rather, it is
the risk of harm that you should try to minimise. HOW?
HARM
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
24/44
A researcher must be responsible holding theinformation.
Sensitivity of topic &/or data
Can responses/results affect the subjects life ifknown by others
How public/private is the setting?
Public display of the data Personally identifiable information should be
removed or changed
PRIVACY
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
25/44
Confidentiality and Anonymity
Confidentiality is a basic requirement in all
studies (sagepub.com)
The researcher agrees not to reveal the identity of the
participants to anyone other than the researcher. A stronger condition if it can be met is that of anonymity.
This means the identity of the participant is not known by anyone including the researcher.
EXAMPLE: Conducting survey to a large group of people
Fill-out the instrument but not include the names on the surveyform.
The researcher will have the data but no names.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
26/44
Often tied to the informed part of consent
how can participants know (a) that they are takingpart in research and (b) what the research
requires of them if they are being deceived? Omission: withhold information (the information
was refused to give)
Commission: provide false information
i.e., lying Establishing false intimacy
DECEPTION
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
27/44
Falsifying, modifying, or omitting data
Reporting errors
Keep data and materials for 5 years Data and materials available to others
Duplicate publication/presentation
Accuracy of scientific knowledge
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
28/44
Intellectual property rights
Authorship
Order of authorship
Formulating hyphothesis
Creating experimental design Organizing and conducting stattistical analysis
Interpreting results
Writing a major position of the paper
Reviewers cant steal
Plagiarism
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
29/44
Plagiarism
What is plagiarism?
What are the types?
Intentional stealing
Inadequate citation
Common knowledge v. Opinion
Secondary source
Failure to indicate quotation
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
30/44
Paraphrasing
Take notes and include citations
Dont read and write
Break it down
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
31/44
Falsification
Manipulating research materials, equipment, orprocesses, or changing or omitting data or resultssuch that the researcher is not accuratelyrepresented in the research record.
Publishing or reporting misleading factsassociated with a study, research orexperimentation.
Falsifying data/ evidence Fabricating data/ evidence
Plagiarism
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
32/44
Effects of falsification
Research participants are greatly dependent
upon the experimentation made by the
researcher to provide direction.
Society depends on a valid research to
determine best plan.
Thus, falsification act can be extremely
dangerous.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
33/44
What causes?
Pride is the motivator.
Researcher has this pride of they have to be right.
It may be that they believe in the hypothesis and believethat it should be an accepted theory that they are willing to
risk their career on it.
Money is another motivator.
Funding is normally based on results.
If there is a feeling that funding may be cut if theresults cannot be proven in the favor of the financierof the project this may promote dishonesty inreporting.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
34/44
Mr. A has just discovered an error in a paper that has
been accepted for publication in a journal.
The error does not affect the overall results of his
research, but it is potentially misleading.
The journal has just gone to press, so it is too late to
catch the error before it appears in print. In order to
avoid embarrassment, Mr. A decides to ignore the
error.
Cases involving ethical rules
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
35/44
Q:
What is the unethical actionof Mr. A?
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
36/44
A:
Mr. A's error is not misconduct nor it is his
decision to take no action to correct the error.
Most researchers, as well as many different
policies and codes, would say that Mr. A shouldtell about the error and consider publishing an
errata. Failing to publish a correction would be
unethical becauseit would violate norms relatingto honesty and objectivity in research.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
37/44
You are interested in understanding the organisational
culture of a firm. You feel that observation would be an
appropriate research method in a naturalistic setting.
However, you feel that if employees knew that youwere monitoring them, they may behave in a different
way.
Therefore, you may have received permission to go
undercover or provide an explanation why you are
there, which is not the truth
Cases involving ethical rules
Other acti ities that does not define as
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
38/44
Other activities that does not define as
misconduct but which are still regarded as
unethical
These are
called "other
deviations"
from
acceptableresearch
practices.
Unethical actions:
Including a colleague as an author on a paper in return
for a favor even though the colleague did not make a
serious contribution to the paper
Discussing with your colleagues confidential data from apaper that you are reviewing for a journal
Bypassing the peer review process and announcing your
results through a press conference without giving peers
adequate information to review your work
Conducting a review of the literature that fails toacknowledge the contributions of other people in the
field or relevant prior work
Rejecting a manuscript for publication without even
reading it
Stealing supplies, books, or data
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
39/44
Most of these would also violate different
professional ethics codes or institutional
policies.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
40/44
Summary
Researchers must fully understand the policies and theories designed inresearch ethics to guarantee upstanding research practices.
Now that you have read these basic principles of research ethics, you maywant to understand how the research strategy you have chosen affectsyour approach to research ethics
Researchers must, where feasible, also provide research participants withan appropriate summary of the research results.
Researchers must take all reasonable steps to ensure that their findingsare accurate and properly reported.
If they become aware of misleading or inaccurate statements about theirwork, they must correct the record as soon as possible.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
41/44
Good practice in Research
Confidentiality of information
Voluntary participation
Reducing risks to participants
Informed consent
Protection of data
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
42/44
What is publication?
It is the dissemination of your findings to the
scientific community
Scientific publications are subject to peer
review
Publication of research findings: Researchers have a responsibility to their colleagues and the wider
community to disseminate a full account of their research as broadlyas possible.
The account should be complete, and, where applicable, include
negative findings and results contrary to their hypotheses.
8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
43/44
References
Dr. M. Macdonald, Ethical Issues in Research
into Applied Linguistics and Language
Education
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources
/bioethics/whatis/
http://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-
research-ethics.php
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/http://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://dissertation.laerd.com/principles-of-research-ethics.phphttp://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/8/11/2019 Research Ethics AQUINO
44/44