Research Article Enhanced Structural Integrity and …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2014/359019.pdf · 2017. 12. 4. · Research Article Enhanced Structural Integrity and Electrochemical
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Research ArticleEnhanced Structural Integrity and ElectrochemicalPerformance of AlPO4-Coated MoO2 Anode Material forLithium-Ion Batteries
Joseacute I Loacutepez-Peacuterez123 Edwin O Ortiz-Quiles14 Khaled Habiba12
Mariel Jimeacutenez-Rodriacuteguez123 Brad R Weiner134 and Gerardo Morell123
1 Institute of Functional Nanomaterials University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras Campus San Juan PR 00931-3334 USA2Department of Physics University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras Campus San Juan PR 00936-8377 USA3 Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials University Research Center University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras Campus San JuanPR 00931-3346 USA
4Department of Chemistry University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras Campus San Juan PR 00931-3346 USA
Correspondence should be addressed to Jose I Lopez-Perez lopezjoseismaelgmailcom
Received 24 December 2013 Accepted 15 January 2014 Published 4 March 2014
Academic Editors S-M Lee and E Valles
Copyright copy 2014 Jose I Lopez-Perez et al This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properlycited
AlPO4nanoparticleswere synthesized via chemical depositionmethod andused for the surfacemodification ofMoO
2to improve its
structural stability and electrochemical performance Structure and surfacemorphology of pristine andAlPO4-coatedMoO
2anode
material were characterized by electron microscopy imaging (SEM and TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) AlPO4nanoparticles
were observed covering the surface of MoO2 Surface analyses show that the synthesized AlPO
4is amorphous and the surface
modification with AlPO4does not result in a distortion of the lattice structure of MoO
2 The electrochemical properties of pristine
and AlPO4-coated MoO
2were characterized in the voltage range of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ Cyclic voltammetry studies indicate
that the improvement in electrochemical performance of the AlPO4-coated anodematerial was attributed to the stabilization of the
lattice structure during lithiation Galvanostatic chargedischarge and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) studies revealthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating improves the rate capability and cycle stability and contributes toward decreasing surface layer
and charge-transfer resistancesThese results suggest that surfacemodificationwithAlPO4nanoparticles suppresses the elimination
of oxygen vacancies in the lattice structure during cycling leading to a better rate performance and cycle life
1 Introduction
Lithium ion batteries are extensively used in a variety ofportable electronic devices due to their high power densityand long cycle life [1] As reported they are criticallyimportant for electrichybrid vehicles as the power storage ofthe future [2] Therefore lithium ion batteries have attractedmuch interest in the field of fundamental study and appliedresearch Most commercialized lithium ion batteries usegraphite as an anode material due to its accessibility andlow cost but its theoretical capacity is only 372mAhsdotgminus1calculated by forming the compound of LiC
6and cannot
meet the ever-increasing demands for high capacity lithium
ion technology [3] By replacing graphite with transitionmetal oxides as anode materials the capacity is enhancedThis is due to their close packed oxygen array providing aframework structure and specific site for topotactic insertionand removal of lithium ions during chargedischarge processA number of transition metal oxides have been studied andreported so far including Mn
3O4 Co3O4 MnO TiO
2 NiO
MoO2
and SnO2 because of their possibility of various
oxidation states and the search of new materials for energystorage [3 4]
In order to improve structural stability and electrochem-ical behavior many groups have demonstrated that the addi-tion of a thin coating of metal phosphates fluorides oxides
Hindawi Publishing CorporationISRN ElectrochemistryVolume 2014 Article ID 359019 12 pageshttpdxdoiorg1011552014359019
2 ISRN Electrochemistry
or other analogous materials onto the cathode particle resultsin reduced irreversible capacity improved rate capabilityand cycle life [5] Surface modification of the electrodematerial by substitution is an effective method to improvethe electrochemical properties [6] Such substitutions areusually done for electrochemically active elements causinglower capacity and Li+ diffusion because the substitutionsare usually electrochemically inactive ingredients A coatingapproach is beneficial with respect to delivery of the initialcapacity because there is no reduction of the amount ofelectrochemically active element in the electrode materialTherefore a small amount of coating on the surface of elec-trode materials can improve the electrochemical properties[7ndash9]The improvements in performance of these lithium ioncathodes by surface modification via the addition of coatingshave been attributed to a diverse series of mechanismssuch as the coating promoting the retention of oxide ionvacancies in the crystal lattice after the first charge [10]suppression of the decomposition of the electrolyte [11] andthe maintenance of low microstrain for better structuralintegrity and crystallinity during cycling [12]
Aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) an environmentally fri-
endly lower cost and thermally stable material is of greatinterest in both environmental and technological fields [13]With regard to the application of AlPO
4for lithium ion
batteries other groups reported improvement concerningthe safety and the electrochemical properties of the cathodematerials by applying a direct coating of AlPO
4nanoparticles
from an aqueous solution [14ndash16] Jiao et al [17] successfullyprepared AlPO
4-coated LiV
3O8powders by mixing active
material LiV3O8
with AlPO4
nanoparticle suspensionfollowed by a low temperature heat treatment The AlPO
4-
coated material was found to reduce the capacity fadingsignificantly Manthiram and Wu [18] studied the effectsof surface modification of Li
2MnO3and LiMO
2(where M
= Mn Ni and Co) solid solutions modified with 3wtAl2O3 CeO
2 ZrO
2 SiO
2 ZnO AlPO
4and 005 atom
Fminus per formula unit and were characterized by XRD andchargedischarge measurements in lithium cells Among allcoating materials results showed that the AlPO
4modified
sample had the largest reduction in irreversible capacitycompared to the rest of the samples modified with differentcoatings Cho [19] reported that LiCoO
2cathodes coatedwith
AlPO4have improved their electrochemical performance
due to the formation of homogeneous surface layers incontrast with other coating materials (Al
2O3and ZrO
2)
Recently MoO2 with a theoretical reversible capacity
of sim838mAhsdotgminus1 has received much attention and hasbeen considered as a promising anode material in lithiumion batteries because of its low electrical resistivity highelectrochemical activity and high chemical stability [20]One of the intrinsic drawbacks of MoO
2for lithium ion
battery applications is its volume expansion during Li+insertionextraction process The irreversible volume changecauses MoO
2particles to pulverize and crack causing
the detachment of the active material from the currentcollector and consequently leading to a substantial loss incapacity [21] In this context we hereby present a study of
the effects of AlPO4nanoparticle coating on the structural
and electrochemical properties of MoO2anode material
2 Experimental
Commercially available high purity chemicals were directlyused without further purification Pristine MoO
2powder
(Molybdenum (IV) oxide Sigma Aldrich) was sintered at350∘C for 2 hours and ground thoroughly with an agatemortar and pestle until a fine and homogeneous powder wasobtained To prepare AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 stoichiometric
amounts of aluminum nitrate nonahydrate (Al(NO3)39H2O-
98 Alfa Aesar) and ammonium hydrogen phosphate((NH4)2HPO4 Alfa Aesar) were dissolved separately in
nanopure water Ammonium hydrogen phosphate solutionwas slowly added to the aluminum nitrate nonahydratesolution until a white AlPO
4nanoparticle suspension was
observed MoO2powder with an average particle size of
sim5 120583m was added to the coating solution and stirred thor-oughly for 2 hours The amount of AlPO
4in the solution was
sim3wt of the MoO2powder The solution was then filtered
dried at room temperature in air and sintered at 400∘C for 4hours in flowing argon
21 Electrode Preparation Electrodes were prepared by spraycoating Cu foil substrates with slurries of 90wt anodepowder 5 wt carbon black (100 compressed 995metalbasis Alfa Aesar) and 5wt PVDF binder (poly-vinylidenefluoride Alfa Aesar) in 1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (anhy-drous 995 SigmaAldrich)The pristine andAlPO
4-coated
MoO2electrode materials were used as working electrodes
Coin cells were assembled inside an argon-filled glove box(M Braun USA) using stainless steel CR2032 coin cellhardware Li metal foil was used as the counter and thereference electrode (075mm thick times 19mm wide 999metal basis Alfa Aesar) Electrodes inside the coin cell wereseparated using a Celgard 2400 membrane Lithium hexaflu-orophosphate (LiPF
6) dissolved in a 1 1 molar ratio solution
of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene carbonate (EC)was used as the electrolyteMultiple coin cells were assembledin order to validate the reproducibility of the surface analysisand electrochemical experiments
22 Imaging and Surface Analysis Characterization PowderX-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried outusing a Rigaku Ultima III X-ray diffractometer (Cu K120572radiation Rigaku Japan) at an accelerating potential of40 kV and a tube current of 20mA to identify the crystallinephase of the synthesized pristine powders and AlPO
4-coated
powders before and after lithiation XRD data were collectedat 3∘minminus1 in the 2-theta range of 20ndash80∘ Field emissionscanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM JSM-7500F JEOLJapan) was employed at working voltage of 15 kV to studythe surface morphology of the prepared powders and cycledelectrodes Transmission electron microscopy (TEM CarlZeiss-LEO 922 Germany) at a working voltage of 200 kV andequippedwithX-rays energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS)was used to determine the morphology and composition of
ISRN Electrochemistry 3
5120583m
(a)
Fractures
5120583m
(b)
5120583m
(c)
5120583m
(d)
Figure 1 Scanning electron microscopy of pristine MoO2electrodes (a) before and (b) after cycling and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes (c)
before and (d) after cycling
the pristine and AlPO4-coated samples The samples were
placed in a copper grid
23 Electrochemical Characterization Cyclic voltammetry(CV) tests were carried out at room temperature on a SeriesG-750 PotentiostatGalvanostatZRA Gamry workstation inthe potential window of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at a scan rateof 02mV sminus1 Galvanostatic charge and discharge capacitycycles were also carried out in this workstation at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 between 001ndash25 V ver-sus LiLi+ at room temperature Electrochemical impedancespectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on aPARSTAT 2273 PotentiostatGalvanostat (Advanced Mea-surement Tech Inc) with an applied AC signal amplitudeof 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to10mHz
3 Results and Discussion
31 Imaging and Surface Analysis Characterization
311 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) The morphologyof the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes before
and after cycling is shown in Figure 1 in the scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images Before cycling the two powderswere generally indistinguishable from one anotherThey havean average size of sim5 to 10 120583m indicating that the AlPO
4
coating did not lead to clumping or any other observablechange in the microstructure of the anode particles Incomparison cracks and crumbles are observed in the pristinematerial after cycling (Figure 1(c)) as a result of the largevolume expansion during lithium insertionextraction Thiscracking and crumbling during cycling keeps generating newactive surfaces that were previously passivated by the stablesurface films [22] Such cracks and crumbles are not observed(Figure 1(d)) in the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2after cycling It is
quite likely that the AlPO4nanoparticle coating significantly
reduces the formation of surface cracks induced by thevolume expansion of the electrode material and thereforediminishes the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyteinterfaces affecting the capacity fading [22]
312 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and X-RayEnergy Dispersive Spectroscopy (XEDS) TEM images of pris-tine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode material were collected
in order to determine the nature of the AlPO4coating
nanoparticles Figure 2(b) shows the coreMoO2anodemate-
rial uniformly covered by the AlPO4nanoparticles Study
4 ISRN Electrochemistry
MoO2
1120583m
(a)
500nm
MoO2
AlPO4
coating
(b)
200nm
MoO2
AlPO4
coating
(c)
Figure 2 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) pristine MoO2 (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 and (c) AlPO
4nanoparticle
coating
at higher magnification (Figure 2(c)) further reveals that theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating consists of uniformparticleswith
an average diameter of sim80 nm The distribution of Al andP was examined by X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy(XEDS) characterization technique and the results are dis-played in Figure 3 EDS data confirm the presence of Al andP in the coating layer and the absence of Al or P componentsin the pristine sampleThe presence of the Cu signal is due tothe copper grid used in TEM analysis
313 X-Ray Diffraction Analysis The XRD patterns of pris-tine MoO
2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2powders are shown in
Figure 4 Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the XRD patterns ofthe pristine andAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2powders before cycling
respectively Both powders were confirmed to bewell-defined
monoclinic structure with the space group of P21119899
withno additional diffraction patterns related to AlPO
4coating
layer Pristine and AlPO4-coated powders showed the same
lattice parameter values of 119886 = 5606 A 119887 = 4859 Aand 119888 = 5537 A (JCPDS card 32-0671) revealing thatthe AlPO
4coating was not incorporated into the anode
material as no changes were perceived in the structure [23]Furthermore the two diffraction patterns overlap nearlyidentically indicating that the sintering treatment or otherprocedures involved with the AlPO
4coating did not result
in distortion of the crystal lattice [5] This result showsthat the AlPO
4is just coated on the surface of the MoO
2
powders [24] Peaks between sim40ndash45∘ are characteristic ofgraphite [25] while the peaks at sim50∘ and sim74∘ correspondto the Cu-foil substrate (JCPDS card number 04-0836) [26]As we want to evaluate if there are significant changes in
ISRN Electrochemistry 5
Cou
nts (
k)56
49
42
35
28
21
14
OCMo
Mo
Mo
310 610 910 1210 1510 1810 2110 2410
Cu
Energy (keV)
(a)
Cou
nts (
k)
P
C
Mo
Mo
Energy (keV)
Cu
CuAl
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
7
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
(b)
Figure 3 X-ray Electron Dispersion Spectroscopy (XEDS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials
the lattice structure after cycling lithium cells were openedinside and argon-filled glove box to recover the electrodesThese electrodes were rinsed in EC dried under vacuumand studied exposed by XRD Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show theXRD data of the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2samples
after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge In thepristine sample (Figure 4(c)) a careful inspection revealsthat diffraction peaks evolved in the 25∘ndash35∘ 2theta rangeThis peak evolution corresponding to Li
2O formation during
lithiation process [27] may indicate a partial interchange ofoccupancy of Li+ and transition metal ions giving rise todisordering in the lattice structure due to an irreversible lossof oxygen during cycling [28]This interchange of occupancyis known to deteriorate the electrochemical performance ofthe layered material [29 30] Such peaks are not observedin the AlPO
4-coated sample (Figure 4(d)) This probably
suggests that the evenly dispersed AlPO4coating suppresses
microstructural defects and structural degradation acting asa protective coating layer and therefore enhancing structuralstability of MoO
2electrode material
32 Electrochemical Characterization
321 Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) Studies Cyclic voltammetry(CV) of pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2between 001ndash
25 V at a scan rate of 02mV sminus1 was performed at roomtemperature to understand the effect of AlPO
4coating on the
Li+ insertionextraction behavior of MoO2 Figure 5 shows
two pairs of redox peaks at sim123157V versus LiLi+ andsim150180V versus LiLi+ corresponding to the reversiblephase transition of Li
119909MoO2and MoO
2caused by the
insertion and extraction of lithium ions [3 31] According toprevious research [32 33] the two reactions correspondingto the two redox processes observed in the cyclic voltammo-grams in Figure 5 are as follows
MoO2+ 4Li+ + 4eminus 997888rarr Mo + 2Li
2O (1)
Mo + 119909Li+ + 119909eminus larrrarr Li119909MoO2
(2)
During discharge the lithium bonds to the oxygenin MoO
2 forming Mo metal and Li
2O Then the Mo
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2120579 (deg)
Inte
nsity
(au
)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(111
)
(211
)
(222
)
(031
)
(402
)(204
)(411
)(413
)
(132
)
Figure 4 X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) pristineMoO2and
(b) AlPO4-coated MoO
2before cycling and (c) pristine MoO
2and
(d) AlPO4-coatedMoO
2 Note the additional peaks of Li
2O (marked
by asterisk) after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge
partially alloysdealloys up to the theoretical limit ofLi119909MoO2(sim838mAhsdotgminus1) For pristine MoO
2(Figure 5(a))
oxidation peaks slightly shift to higher potentials while thereduction peaks slightly shift to lower potentials (indicatedwith arrows) In addition as cycling proceeds oxidationand reduction peak intensities decrease rapidly This elec-trochemical behavior indicates the structural degradationof MoO
2anode material and an increase in the internal
resistance during cycling leading to the fast capacity lossof the pristine MoO
2anode material [24 34] Electrodes
suffer from capacity loss and poor rate capability becausethere are incomplete reversible phase transition and localstructural damages during lithiation On the other handit is observed that the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2(Figure 5(b))
shows better cycling stability compared to pristine MoO2
During cycling almost no oxidation and reduction peakshifts are observed suggesting a more stable lattice structureFurthermore the peak intensity declines much slower thanthat of the pristine MoO
2 indicating that capacity retention
is noticeably enhanced after the AlPO4nanoparticle coating
2anode material at a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1
in the voltage range of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+
322 Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge Capacity StudiesTo study the electrochemical performance of pristine andAlPO
4-coated MoO
2 charge and discharge capacities were
measured at a potential window of 001ndash25 V at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 at room temperatureThe first charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO
4-
coated MoO2electrodes at a constant current density of
50mAsdotgminus1 are represented in Figure 6 The first cycle chargecapacity has been observed to be higher in the case of
the AlPO4-coated anode material (sim1008mAhsdotgminus1) com-
pared to the pristine anode material (sim625mAhsdotgminus1) Onthe other hand a higher first cycle discharge capacity isobserved in the case of AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2(sim1015mAhsdotgminus1)
compared to the pristine MoO2(sim650mAhsdotgminus1) These
enhanced first cycle charge and discharge capacities can beattributed to the effective removal of lithium and oxygenfrom the host structure [35] In both samples there are twoconstant potential plateaus at sim140 and 170V on the first
Figure 7 Initial charge and discharge curves of (a) pristineMoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2at current densities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1
between 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at room temperature
charge cycles as well as two potential plateaus at sim157 and13 V on the first discharge cycles These results are consistentwith those reported by Liang et al [33] since the inflectionpoints between these potential plateaus represent a transitionbetween monoclinic phase and orthogonal phase in thepartially Li
119909MoO2 It is clearly observed that surface modi-
fication with AlPO4nanoparticles can significantly improve
the electrochemical performance of MoO2anode material
PristineMoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity (IRC)
of 25mAhsdotgminus1 during the first cycle while the AlPO4-coated
MoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity of 7mAhsdotgminus1
during the first cycle The observed IRC and initial dischargecapacity values confirm that oxide ion vacancies are partiallyretained in the lattice during the initial charge In otherwords we can imply that surface modification suppresses theelimination of oxide ion vacanciesThis could be attributed tothe mechanism proposed by Armstrong et al [36] suggest-ing that surface modification suppresses the elimination ofoxygen vacancies during the initial charge and consequentlyallows a reversible insertionextraction of higher amountsof lithium in the subsequent discharge cycles [36] Figure 7shows the initial charge and discharge profiles of the pristineandAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2anodematerials at current densities
of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 As shown in Figure 7(a) theinitial discharge capacity of the pristineMoO
2is 434mAhsdotgminus1
at a current density of 100mAsdotgminus1 When the current densityis increased to 200mAsdotgminus1 pristineMoO
2only undergoes an
initial discharge capacity of 219mAhsdotgminus1 The pristine MoO2
exhibits a relatively poor rate capability Comparatively theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2exhibits an enhanced rate capability
as illustrated in Figure 7(b) The discharge capacities ofthe AlPO
4-coated MoO
2at current densities of 100 and
200mAsdotgminus1 are 647 and 341mAhsdotgminus1 respectively indicatingthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating significantly improves
rate capability The electrochemical data collected from thepristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes are denoted in
Table 1Now let us compare the cycle performance of pristine and
AlPO4-coated MoO
2electrodes considering the discharge
capacity as a function of cycle number for the first 50 cyclesas presented in Figure 8 At a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1pristine MoO
2exhibits an initial discharge capacity of
650mAhsdotgminus1 as discussed above It declines to 297mAhsdotgminus1after 50 cycles with a capacity loss of 54 By contrast theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrode delivers an initial discharge
capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 It declines to 787mAhsdotgminus1 after50 cycles with a capacity loss of 22 Rate capabilitycycling stability and discharge capacities of the AlPO
4-
coated samples are improved after 50 cycles compared to thepristine samplesHowever with ongoing cycling lithium ionscan eventually penetrate the coating protective layer thusbecoming incorporated into the lattice of MoO
2 This can be
ascribed to the gradual elimination of oxygen vacancies inthe anode material which can be part of the reason for thecapacity fading during cycling Generally this improvementin the discharge capacity rate capability and cycling stabilitycan be explained due to the obstruction of the transitionmetal ions by theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating tomigrate from
the surface to the bulk in the vacant sites for the lithiuminsertion thereforemaintaining the high concentration of theavailable sites for lithium insertion [10] The AlPO
4coating
is an electronic insulator as reported by Kim et al [22]indicating that most of the oxidation and reduction reactionswith lithium ions and electrons occur mainly at the interfacebetween the anode material and AlPO
4coating and not at
the interface of AlPO4coating and electrolyte From these
results we conclude that AlPO4-coated anode material holds
better cycling performance compared to the pristine anodematerial
8 ISRN Electrochemistry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
50mAmiddotgminus1
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
100mAmiddotgminus1
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
100
200
300
400
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
200mAmiddotgminus1
(c)
Figure 8 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number of pristine MoO2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
Table 1 Electrochemical data of galvanostatic charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO4-coated MoO2
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
or other analogous materials onto the cathode particle resultsin reduced irreversible capacity improved rate capabilityand cycle life [5] Surface modification of the electrodematerial by substitution is an effective method to improvethe electrochemical properties [6] Such substitutions areusually done for electrochemically active elements causinglower capacity and Li+ diffusion because the substitutionsare usually electrochemically inactive ingredients A coatingapproach is beneficial with respect to delivery of the initialcapacity because there is no reduction of the amount ofelectrochemically active element in the electrode materialTherefore a small amount of coating on the surface of elec-trode materials can improve the electrochemical properties[7ndash9]The improvements in performance of these lithium ioncathodes by surface modification via the addition of coatingshave been attributed to a diverse series of mechanismssuch as the coating promoting the retention of oxide ionvacancies in the crystal lattice after the first charge [10]suppression of the decomposition of the electrolyte [11] andthe maintenance of low microstrain for better structuralintegrity and crystallinity during cycling [12]
Aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) an environmentally fri-
endly lower cost and thermally stable material is of greatinterest in both environmental and technological fields [13]With regard to the application of AlPO
4for lithium ion
batteries other groups reported improvement concerningthe safety and the electrochemical properties of the cathodematerials by applying a direct coating of AlPO
4nanoparticles
from an aqueous solution [14ndash16] Jiao et al [17] successfullyprepared AlPO
4-coated LiV
3O8powders by mixing active
material LiV3O8
with AlPO4
nanoparticle suspensionfollowed by a low temperature heat treatment The AlPO
4-
coated material was found to reduce the capacity fadingsignificantly Manthiram and Wu [18] studied the effectsof surface modification of Li
2MnO3and LiMO
2(where M
= Mn Ni and Co) solid solutions modified with 3wtAl2O3 CeO
2 ZrO
2 SiO
2 ZnO AlPO
4and 005 atom
Fminus per formula unit and were characterized by XRD andchargedischarge measurements in lithium cells Among allcoating materials results showed that the AlPO
4modified
sample had the largest reduction in irreversible capacitycompared to the rest of the samples modified with differentcoatings Cho [19] reported that LiCoO
2cathodes coatedwith
AlPO4have improved their electrochemical performance
due to the formation of homogeneous surface layers incontrast with other coating materials (Al
2O3and ZrO
2)
Recently MoO2 with a theoretical reversible capacity
of sim838mAhsdotgminus1 has received much attention and hasbeen considered as a promising anode material in lithiumion batteries because of its low electrical resistivity highelectrochemical activity and high chemical stability [20]One of the intrinsic drawbacks of MoO
2for lithium ion
battery applications is its volume expansion during Li+insertionextraction process The irreversible volume changecauses MoO
2particles to pulverize and crack causing
the detachment of the active material from the currentcollector and consequently leading to a substantial loss incapacity [21] In this context we hereby present a study of
the effects of AlPO4nanoparticle coating on the structural
and electrochemical properties of MoO2anode material
2 Experimental
Commercially available high purity chemicals were directlyused without further purification Pristine MoO
2powder
(Molybdenum (IV) oxide Sigma Aldrich) was sintered at350∘C for 2 hours and ground thoroughly with an agatemortar and pestle until a fine and homogeneous powder wasobtained To prepare AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 stoichiometric
amounts of aluminum nitrate nonahydrate (Al(NO3)39H2O-
98 Alfa Aesar) and ammonium hydrogen phosphate((NH4)2HPO4 Alfa Aesar) were dissolved separately in
nanopure water Ammonium hydrogen phosphate solutionwas slowly added to the aluminum nitrate nonahydratesolution until a white AlPO
4nanoparticle suspension was
observed MoO2powder with an average particle size of
sim5 120583m was added to the coating solution and stirred thor-oughly for 2 hours The amount of AlPO
4in the solution was
sim3wt of the MoO2powder The solution was then filtered
dried at room temperature in air and sintered at 400∘C for 4hours in flowing argon
21 Electrode Preparation Electrodes were prepared by spraycoating Cu foil substrates with slurries of 90wt anodepowder 5 wt carbon black (100 compressed 995metalbasis Alfa Aesar) and 5wt PVDF binder (poly-vinylidenefluoride Alfa Aesar) in 1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (anhy-drous 995 SigmaAldrich)The pristine andAlPO
4-coated
MoO2electrode materials were used as working electrodes
Coin cells were assembled inside an argon-filled glove box(M Braun USA) using stainless steel CR2032 coin cellhardware Li metal foil was used as the counter and thereference electrode (075mm thick times 19mm wide 999metal basis Alfa Aesar) Electrodes inside the coin cell wereseparated using a Celgard 2400 membrane Lithium hexaflu-orophosphate (LiPF
6) dissolved in a 1 1 molar ratio solution
of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethylene carbonate (EC)was used as the electrolyteMultiple coin cells were assembledin order to validate the reproducibility of the surface analysisand electrochemical experiments
22 Imaging and Surface Analysis Characterization PowderX-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried outusing a Rigaku Ultima III X-ray diffractometer (Cu K120572radiation Rigaku Japan) at an accelerating potential of40 kV and a tube current of 20mA to identify the crystallinephase of the synthesized pristine powders and AlPO
4-coated
powders before and after lithiation XRD data were collectedat 3∘minminus1 in the 2-theta range of 20ndash80∘ Field emissionscanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM JSM-7500F JEOLJapan) was employed at working voltage of 15 kV to studythe surface morphology of the prepared powders and cycledelectrodes Transmission electron microscopy (TEM CarlZeiss-LEO 922 Germany) at a working voltage of 200 kV andequippedwithX-rays energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS)was used to determine the morphology and composition of
ISRN Electrochemistry 3
5120583m
(a)
Fractures
5120583m
(b)
5120583m
(c)
5120583m
(d)
Figure 1 Scanning electron microscopy of pristine MoO2electrodes (a) before and (b) after cycling and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes (c)
before and (d) after cycling
the pristine and AlPO4-coated samples The samples were
placed in a copper grid
23 Electrochemical Characterization Cyclic voltammetry(CV) tests were carried out at room temperature on a SeriesG-750 PotentiostatGalvanostatZRA Gamry workstation inthe potential window of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at a scan rateof 02mV sminus1 Galvanostatic charge and discharge capacitycycles were also carried out in this workstation at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 between 001ndash25 V ver-sus LiLi+ at room temperature Electrochemical impedancespectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on aPARSTAT 2273 PotentiostatGalvanostat (Advanced Mea-surement Tech Inc) with an applied AC signal amplitudeof 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to10mHz
3 Results and Discussion
31 Imaging and Surface Analysis Characterization
311 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) The morphologyof the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes before
and after cycling is shown in Figure 1 in the scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images Before cycling the two powderswere generally indistinguishable from one anotherThey havean average size of sim5 to 10 120583m indicating that the AlPO
4
coating did not lead to clumping or any other observablechange in the microstructure of the anode particles Incomparison cracks and crumbles are observed in the pristinematerial after cycling (Figure 1(c)) as a result of the largevolume expansion during lithium insertionextraction Thiscracking and crumbling during cycling keeps generating newactive surfaces that were previously passivated by the stablesurface films [22] Such cracks and crumbles are not observed(Figure 1(d)) in the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2after cycling It is
quite likely that the AlPO4nanoparticle coating significantly
reduces the formation of surface cracks induced by thevolume expansion of the electrode material and thereforediminishes the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyteinterfaces affecting the capacity fading [22]
312 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and X-RayEnergy Dispersive Spectroscopy (XEDS) TEM images of pris-tine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode material were collected
in order to determine the nature of the AlPO4coating
nanoparticles Figure 2(b) shows the coreMoO2anodemate-
rial uniformly covered by the AlPO4nanoparticles Study
4 ISRN Electrochemistry
MoO2
1120583m
(a)
500nm
MoO2
AlPO4
coating
(b)
200nm
MoO2
AlPO4
coating
(c)
Figure 2 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) pristine MoO2 (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 and (c) AlPO
4nanoparticle
coating
at higher magnification (Figure 2(c)) further reveals that theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating consists of uniformparticleswith
an average diameter of sim80 nm The distribution of Al andP was examined by X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy(XEDS) characterization technique and the results are dis-played in Figure 3 EDS data confirm the presence of Al andP in the coating layer and the absence of Al or P componentsin the pristine sampleThe presence of the Cu signal is due tothe copper grid used in TEM analysis
313 X-Ray Diffraction Analysis The XRD patterns of pris-tine MoO
2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2powders are shown in
Figure 4 Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the XRD patterns ofthe pristine andAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2powders before cycling
respectively Both powders were confirmed to bewell-defined
monoclinic structure with the space group of P21119899
withno additional diffraction patterns related to AlPO
4coating
layer Pristine and AlPO4-coated powders showed the same
lattice parameter values of 119886 = 5606 A 119887 = 4859 Aand 119888 = 5537 A (JCPDS card 32-0671) revealing thatthe AlPO
4coating was not incorporated into the anode
material as no changes were perceived in the structure [23]Furthermore the two diffraction patterns overlap nearlyidentically indicating that the sintering treatment or otherprocedures involved with the AlPO
4coating did not result
in distortion of the crystal lattice [5] This result showsthat the AlPO
4is just coated on the surface of the MoO
2
powders [24] Peaks between sim40ndash45∘ are characteristic ofgraphite [25] while the peaks at sim50∘ and sim74∘ correspondto the Cu-foil substrate (JCPDS card number 04-0836) [26]As we want to evaluate if there are significant changes in
ISRN Electrochemistry 5
Cou
nts (
k)56
49
42
35
28
21
14
OCMo
Mo
Mo
310 610 910 1210 1510 1810 2110 2410
Cu
Energy (keV)
(a)
Cou
nts (
k)
P
C
Mo
Mo
Energy (keV)
Cu
CuAl
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
7
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
(b)
Figure 3 X-ray Electron Dispersion Spectroscopy (XEDS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials
the lattice structure after cycling lithium cells were openedinside and argon-filled glove box to recover the electrodesThese electrodes were rinsed in EC dried under vacuumand studied exposed by XRD Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show theXRD data of the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2samples
after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge In thepristine sample (Figure 4(c)) a careful inspection revealsthat diffraction peaks evolved in the 25∘ndash35∘ 2theta rangeThis peak evolution corresponding to Li
2O formation during
lithiation process [27] may indicate a partial interchange ofoccupancy of Li+ and transition metal ions giving rise todisordering in the lattice structure due to an irreversible lossof oxygen during cycling [28]This interchange of occupancyis known to deteriorate the electrochemical performance ofthe layered material [29 30] Such peaks are not observedin the AlPO
4-coated sample (Figure 4(d)) This probably
suggests that the evenly dispersed AlPO4coating suppresses
microstructural defects and structural degradation acting asa protective coating layer and therefore enhancing structuralstability of MoO
2electrode material
32 Electrochemical Characterization
321 Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) Studies Cyclic voltammetry(CV) of pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2between 001ndash
25 V at a scan rate of 02mV sminus1 was performed at roomtemperature to understand the effect of AlPO
4coating on the
Li+ insertionextraction behavior of MoO2 Figure 5 shows
two pairs of redox peaks at sim123157V versus LiLi+ andsim150180V versus LiLi+ corresponding to the reversiblephase transition of Li
119909MoO2and MoO
2caused by the
insertion and extraction of lithium ions [3 31] According toprevious research [32 33] the two reactions correspondingto the two redox processes observed in the cyclic voltammo-grams in Figure 5 are as follows
MoO2+ 4Li+ + 4eminus 997888rarr Mo + 2Li
2O (1)
Mo + 119909Li+ + 119909eminus larrrarr Li119909MoO2
(2)
During discharge the lithium bonds to the oxygenin MoO
2 forming Mo metal and Li
2O Then the Mo
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2120579 (deg)
Inte
nsity
(au
)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(111
)
(211
)
(222
)
(031
)
(402
)(204
)(411
)(413
)
(132
)
Figure 4 X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) pristineMoO2and
(b) AlPO4-coated MoO
2before cycling and (c) pristine MoO
2and
(d) AlPO4-coatedMoO
2 Note the additional peaks of Li
2O (marked
by asterisk) after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge
partially alloysdealloys up to the theoretical limit ofLi119909MoO2(sim838mAhsdotgminus1) For pristine MoO
2(Figure 5(a))
oxidation peaks slightly shift to higher potentials while thereduction peaks slightly shift to lower potentials (indicatedwith arrows) In addition as cycling proceeds oxidationand reduction peak intensities decrease rapidly This elec-trochemical behavior indicates the structural degradationof MoO
2anode material and an increase in the internal
resistance during cycling leading to the fast capacity lossof the pristine MoO
2anode material [24 34] Electrodes
suffer from capacity loss and poor rate capability becausethere are incomplete reversible phase transition and localstructural damages during lithiation On the other handit is observed that the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2(Figure 5(b))
shows better cycling stability compared to pristine MoO2
During cycling almost no oxidation and reduction peakshifts are observed suggesting a more stable lattice structureFurthermore the peak intensity declines much slower thanthat of the pristine MoO
2 indicating that capacity retention
is noticeably enhanced after the AlPO4nanoparticle coating
2anode material at a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1
in the voltage range of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+
322 Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge Capacity StudiesTo study the electrochemical performance of pristine andAlPO
4-coated MoO
2 charge and discharge capacities were
measured at a potential window of 001ndash25 V at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 at room temperatureThe first charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO
4-
coated MoO2electrodes at a constant current density of
50mAsdotgminus1 are represented in Figure 6 The first cycle chargecapacity has been observed to be higher in the case of
the AlPO4-coated anode material (sim1008mAhsdotgminus1) com-
pared to the pristine anode material (sim625mAhsdotgminus1) Onthe other hand a higher first cycle discharge capacity isobserved in the case of AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2(sim1015mAhsdotgminus1)
compared to the pristine MoO2(sim650mAhsdotgminus1) These
enhanced first cycle charge and discharge capacities can beattributed to the effective removal of lithium and oxygenfrom the host structure [35] In both samples there are twoconstant potential plateaus at sim140 and 170V on the first
Figure 7 Initial charge and discharge curves of (a) pristineMoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2at current densities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1
between 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at room temperature
charge cycles as well as two potential plateaus at sim157 and13 V on the first discharge cycles These results are consistentwith those reported by Liang et al [33] since the inflectionpoints between these potential plateaus represent a transitionbetween monoclinic phase and orthogonal phase in thepartially Li
119909MoO2 It is clearly observed that surface modi-
fication with AlPO4nanoparticles can significantly improve
the electrochemical performance of MoO2anode material
PristineMoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity (IRC)
of 25mAhsdotgminus1 during the first cycle while the AlPO4-coated
MoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity of 7mAhsdotgminus1
during the first cycle The observed IRC and initial dischargecapacity values confirm that oxide ion vacancies are partiallyretained in the lattice during the initial charge In otherwords we can imply that surface modification suppresses theelimination of oxide ion vacanciesThis could be attributed tothe mechanism proposed by Armstrong et al [36] suggest-ing that surface modification suppresses the elimination ofoxygen vacancies during the initial charge and consequentlyallows a reversible insertionextraction of higher amountsof lithium in the subsequent discharge cycles [36] Figure 7shows the initial charge and discharge profiles of the pristineandAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2anodematerials at current densities
of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 As shown in Figure 7(a) theinitial discharge capacity of the pristineMoO
2is 434mAhsdotgminus1
at a current density of 100mAsdotgminus1 When the current densityis increased to 200mAsdotgminus1 pristineMoO
2only undergoes an
initial discharge capacity of 219mAhsdotgminus1 The pristine MoO2
exhibits a relatively poor rate capability Comparatively theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2exhibits an enhanced rate capability
as illustrated in Figure 7(b) The discharge capacities ofthe AlPO
4-coated MoO
2at current densities of 100 and
200mAsdotgminus1 are 647 and 341mAhsdotgminus1 respectively indicatingthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating significantly improves
rate capability The electrochemical data collected from thepristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes are denoted in
Table 1Now let us compare the cycle performance of pristine and
AlPO4-coated MoO
2electrodes considering the discharge
capacity as a function of cycle number for the first 50 cyclesas presented in Figure 8 At a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1pristine MoO
2exhibits an initial discharge capacity of
650mAhsdotgminus1 as discussed above It declines to 297mAhsdotgminus1after 50 cycles with a capacity loss of 54 By contrast theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrode delivers an initial discharge
capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 It declines to 787mAhsdotgminus1 after50 cycles with a capacity loss of 22 Rate capabilitycycling stability and discharge capacities of the AlPO
4-
coated samples are improved after 50 cycles compared to thepristine samplesHowever with ongoing cycling lithium ionscan eventually penetrate the coating protective layer thusbecoming incorporated into the lattice of MoO
2 This can be
ascribed to the gradual elimination of oxygen vacancies inthe anode material which can be part of the reason for thecapacity fading during cycling Generally this improvementin the discharge capacity rate capability and cycling stabilitycan be explained due to the obstruction of the transitionmetal ions by theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating tomigrate from
the surface to the bulk in the vacant sites for the lithiuminsertion thereforemaintaining the high concentration of theavailable sites for lithium insertion [10] The AlPO
4coating
is an electronic insulator as reported by Kim et al [22]indicating that most of the oxidation and reduction reactionswith lithium ions and electrons occur mainly at the interfacebetween the anode material and AlPO
4coating and not at
the interface of AlPO4coating and electrolyte From these
results we conclude that AlPO4-coated anode material holds
better cycling performance compared to the pristine anodematerial
8 ISRN Electrochemistry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
50mAmiddotgminus1
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
100mAmiddotgminus1
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
100
200
300
400
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
200mAmiddotgminus1
(c)
Figure 8 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number of pristine MoO2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
Table 1 Electrochemical data of galvanostatic charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO4-coated MoO2
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
Figure 1 Scanning electron microscopy of pristine MoO2electrodes (a) before and (b) after cycling and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes (c)
before and (d) after cycling
the pristine and AlPO4-coated samples The samples were
placed in a copper grid
23 Electrochemical Characterization Cyclic voltammetry(CV) tests were carried out at room temperature on a SeriesG-750 PotentiostatGalvanostatZRA Gamry workstation inthe potential window of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at a scan rateof 02mV sminus1 Galvanostatic charge and discharge capacitycycles were also carried out in this workstation at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 between 001ndash25 V ver-sus LiLi+ at room temperature Electrochemical impedancespectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on aPARSTAT 2273 PotentiostatGalvanostat (Advanced Mea-surement Tech Inc) with an applied AC signal amplitudeof 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to10mHz
3 Results and Discussion
31 Imaging and Surface Analysis Characterization
311 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) The morphologyof the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes before
and after cycling is shown in Figure 1 in the scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images Before cycling the two powderswere generally indistinguishable from one anotherThey havean average size of sim5 to 10 120583m indicating that the AlPO
4
coating did not lead to clumping or any other observablechange in the microstructure of the anode particles Incomparison cracks and crumbles are observed in the pristinematerial after cycling (Figure 1(c)) as a result of the largevolume expansion during lithium insertionextraction Thiscracking and crumbling during cycling keeps generating newactive surfaces that were previously passivated by the stablesurface films [22] Such cracks and crumbles are not observed(Figure 1(d)) in the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2after cycling It is
quite likely that the AlPO4nanoparticle coating significantly
reduces the formation of surface cracks induced by thevolume expansion of the electrode material and thereforediminishes the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyteinterfaces affecting the capacity fading [22]
312 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and X-RayEnergy Dispersive Spectroscopy (XEDS) TEM images of pris-tine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode material were collected
in order to determine the nature of the AlPO4coating
nanoparticles Figure 2(b) shows the coreMoO2anodemate-
rial uniformly covered by the AlPO4nanoparticles Study
4 ISRN Electrochemistry
MoO2
1120583m
(a)
500nm
MoO2
AlPO4
coating
(b)
200nm
MoO2
AlPO4
coating
(c)
Figure 2 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) pristine MoO2 (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 and (c) AlPO
4nanoparticle
coating
at higher magnification (Figure 2(c)) further reveals that theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating consists of uniformparticleswith
an average diameter of sim80 nm The distribution of Al andP was examined by X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy(XEDS) characterization technique and the results are dis-played in Figure 3 EDS data confirm the presence of Al andP in the coating layer and the absence of Al or P componentsin the pristine sampleThe presence of the Cu signal is due tothe copper grid used in TEM analysis
313 X-Ray Diffraction Analysis The XRD patterns of pris-tine MoO
2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2powders are shown in
Figure 4 Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the XRD patterns ofthe pristine andAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2powders before cycling
respectively Both powders were confirmed to bewell-defined
monoclinic structure with the space group of P21119899
withno additional diffraction patterns related to AlPO
4coating
layer Pristine and AlPO4-coated powders showed the same
lattice parameter values of 119886 = 5606 A 119887 = 4859 Aand 119888 = 5537 A (JCPDS card 32-0671) revealing thatthe AlPO
4coating was not incorporated into the anode
material as no changes were perceived in the structure [23]Furthermore the two diffraction patterns overlap nearlyidentically indicating that the sintering treatment or otherprocedures involved with the AlPO
4coating did not result
in distortion of the crystal lattice [5] This result showsthat the AlPO
4is just coated on the surface of the MoO
2
powders [24] Peaks between sim40ndash45∘ are characteristic ofgraphite [25] while the peaks at sim50∘ and sim74∘ correspondto the Cu-foil substrate (JCPDS card number 04-0836) [26]As we want to evaluate if there are significant changes in
ISRN Electrochemistry 5
Cou
nts (
k)56
49
42
35
28
21
14
OCMo
Mo
Mo
310 610 910 1210 1510 1810 2110 2410
Cu
Energy (keV)
(a)
Cou
nts (
k)
P
C
Mo
Mo
Energy (keV)
Cu
CuAl
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
7
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
(b)
Figure 3 X-ray Electron Dispersion Spectroscopy (XEDS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials
the lattice structure after cycling lithium cells were openedinside and argon-filled glove box to recover the electrodesThese electrodes were rinsed in EC dried under vacuumand studied exposed by XRD Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show theXRD data of the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2samples
after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge In thepristine sample (Figure 4(c)) a careful inspection revealsthat diffraction peaks evolved in the 25∘ndash35∘ 2theta rangeThis peak evolution corresponding to Li
2O formation during
lithiation process [27] may indicate a partial interchange ofoccupancy of Li+ and transition metal ions giving rise todisordering in the lattice structure due to an irreversible lossof oxygen during cycling [28]This interchange of occupancyis known to deteriorate the electrochemical performance ofthe layered material [29 30] Such peaks are not observedin the AlPO
4-coated sample (Figure 4(d)) This probably
suggests that the evenly dispersed AlPO4coating suppresses
microstructural defects and structural degradation acting asa protective coating layer and therefore enhancing structuralstability of MoO
2electrode material
32 Electrochemical Characterization
321 Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) Studies Cyclic voltammetry(CV) of pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2between 001ndash
25 V at a scan rate of 02mV sminus1 was performed at roomtemperature to understand the effect of AlPO
4coating on the
Li+ insertionextraction behavior of MoO2 Figure 5 shows
two pairs of redox peaks at sim123157V versus LiLi+ andsim150180V versus LiLi+ corresponding to the reversiblephase transition of Li
119909MoO2and MoO
2caused by the
insertion and extraction of lithium ions [3 31] According toprevious research [32 33] the two reactions correspondingto the two redox processes observed in the cyclic voltammo-grams in Figure 5 are as follows
MoO2+ 4Li+ + 4eminus 997888rarr Mo + 2Li
2O (1)
Mo + 119909Li+ + 119909eminus larrrarr Li119909MoO2
(2)
During discharge the lithium bonds to the oxygenin MoO
2 forming Mo metal and Li
2O Then the Mo
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2120579 (deg)
Inte
nsity
(au
)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(111
)
(211
)
(222
)
(031
)
(402
)(204
)(411
)(413
)
(132
)
Figure 4 X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) pristineMoO2and
(b) AlPO4-coated MoO
2before cycling and (c) pristine MoO
2and
(d) AlPO4-coatedMoO
2 Note the additional peaks of Li
2O (marked
by asterisk) after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge
partially alloysdealloys up to the theoretical limit ofLi119909MoO2(sim838mAhsdotgminus1) For pristine MoO
2(Figure 5(a))
oxidation peaks slightly shift to higher potentials while thereduction peaks slightly shift to lower potentials (indicatedwith arrows) In addition as cycling proceeds oxidationand reduction peak intensities decrease rapidly This elec-trochemical behavior indicates the structural degradationof MoO
2anode material and an increase in the internal
resistance during cycling leading to the fast capacity lossof the pristine MoO
2anode material [24 34] Electrodes
suffer from capacity loss and poor rate capability becausethere are incomplete reversible phase transition and localstructural damages during lithiation On the other handit is observed that the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2(Figure 5(b))
shows better cycling stability compared to pristine MoO2
During cycling almost no oxidation and reduction peakshifts are observed suggesting a more stable lattice structureFurthermore the peak intensity declines much slower thanthat of the pristine MoO
2 indicating that capacity retention
is noticeably enhanced after the AlPO4nanoparticle coating
2anode material at a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1
in the voltage range of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+
322 Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge Capacity StudiesTo study the electrochemical performance of pristine andAlPO
4-coated MoO
2 charge and discharge capacities were
measured at a potential window of 001ndash25 V at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 at room temperatureThe first charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO
4-
coated MoO2electrodes at a constant current density of
50mAsdotgminus1 are represented in Figure 6 The first cycle chargecapacity has been observed to be higher in the case of
the AlPO4-coated anode material (sim1008mAhsdotgminus1) com-
pared to the pristine anode material (sim625mAhsdotgminus1) Onthe other hand a higher first cycle discharge capacity isobserved in the case of AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2(sim1015mAhsdotgminus1)
compared to the pristine MoO2(sim650mAhsdotgminus1) These
enhanced first cycle charge and discharge capacities can beattributed to the effective removal of lithium and oxygenfrom the host structure [35] In both samples there are twoconstant potential plateaus at sim140 and 170V on the first
Figure 7 Initial charge and discharge curves of (a) pristineMoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2at current densities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1
between 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at room temperature
charge cycles as well as two potential plateaus at sim157 and13 V on the first discharge cycles These results are consistentwith those reported by Liang et al [33] since the inflectionpoints between these potential plateaus represent a transitionbetween monoclinic phase and orthogonal phase in thepartially Li
119909MoO2 It is clearly observed that surface modi-
fication with AlPO4nanoparticles can significantly improve
the electrochemical performance of MoO2anode material
PristineMoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity (IRC)
of 25mAhsdotgminus1 during the first cycle while the AlPO4-coated
MoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity of 7mAhsdotgminus1
during the first cycle The observed IRC and initial dischargecapacity values confirm that oxide ion vacancies are partiallyretained in the lattice during the initial charge In otherwords we can imply that surface modification suppresses theelimination of oxide ion vacanciesThis could be attributed tothe mechanism proposed by Armstrong et al [36] suggest-ing that surface modification suppresses the elimination ofoxygen vacancies during the initial charge and consequentlyallows a reversible insertionextraction of higher amountsof lithium in the subsequent discharge cycles [36] Figure 7shows the initial charge and discharge profiles of the pristineandAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2anodematerials at current densities
of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 As shown in Figure 7(a) theinitial discharge capacity of the pristineMoO
2is 434mAhsdotgminus1
at a current density of 100mAsdotgminus1 When the current densityis increased to 200mAsdotgminus1 pristineMoO
2only undergoes an
initial discharge capacity of 219mAhsdotgminus1 The pristine MoO2
exhibits a relatively poor rate capability Comparatively theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2exhibits an enhanced rate capability
as illustrated in Figure 7(b) The discharge capacities ofthe AlPO
4-coated MoO
2at current densities of 100 and
200mAsdotgminus1 are 647 and 341mAhsdotgminus1 respectively indicatingthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating significantly improves
rate capability The electrochemical data collected from thepristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes are denoted in
Table 1Now let us compare the cycle performance of pristine and
AlPO4-coated MoO
2electrodes considering the discharge
capacity as a function of cycle number for the first 50 cyclesas presented in Figure 8 At a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1pristine MoO
2exhibits an initial discharge capacity of
650mAhsdotgminus1 as discussed above It declines to 297mAhsdotgminus1after 50 cycles with a capacity loss of 54 By contrast theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrode delivers an initial discharge
capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 It declines to 787mAhsdotgminus1 after50 cycles with a capacity loss of 22 Rate capabilitycycling stability and discharge capacities of the AlPO
4-
coated samples are improved after 50 cycles compared to thepristine samplesHowever with ongoing cycling lithium ionscan eventually penetrate the coating protective layer thusbecoming incorporated into the lattice of MoO
2 This can be
ascribed to the gradual elimination of oxygen vacancies inthe anode material which can be part of the reason for thecapacity fading during cycling Generally this improvementin the discharge capacity rate capability and cycling stabilitycan be explained due to the obstruction of the transitionmetal ions by theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating tomigrate from
the surface to the bulk in the vacant sites for the lithiuminsertion thereforemaintaining the high concentration of theavailable sites for lithium insertion [10] The AlPO
4coating
is an electronic insulator as reported by Kim et al [22]indicating that most of the oxidation and reduction reactionswith lithium ions and electrons occur mainly at the interfacebetween the anode material and AlPO
4coating and not at
the interface of AlPO4coating and electrolyte From these
results we conclude that AlPO4-coated anode material holds
better cycling performance compared to the pristine anodematerial
8 ISRN Electrochemistry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
50mAmiddotgminus1
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
100mAmiddotgminus1
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
100
200
300
400
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
200mAmiddotgminus1
(c)
Figure 8 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number of pristine MoO2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
Table 1 Electrochemical data of galvanostatic charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO4-coated MoO2
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
Figure 2 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) pristine MoO2 (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 and (c) AlPO
4nanoparticle
coating
at higher magnification (Figure 2(c)) further reveals that theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating consists of uniformparticleswith
an average diameter of sim80 nm The distribution of Al andP was examined by X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy(XEDS) characterization technique and the results are dis-played in Figure 3 EDS data confirm the presence of Al andP in the coating layer and the absence of Al or P componentsin the pristine sampleThe presence of the Cu signal is due tothe copper grid used in TEM analysis
313 X-Ray Diffraction Analysis The XRD patterns of pris-tine MoO
2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2powders are shown in
Figure 4 Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the XRD patterns ofthe pristine andAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2powders before cycling
respectively Both powders were confirmed to bewell-defined
monoclinic structure with the space group of P21119899
withno additional diffraction patterns related to AlPO
4coating
layer Pristine and AlPO4-coated powders showed the same
lattice parameter values of 119886 = 5606 A 119887 = 4859 Aand 119888 = 5537 A (JCPDS card 32-0671) revealing thatthe AlPO
4coating was not incorporated into the anode
material as no changes were perceived in the structure [23]Furthermore the two diffraction patterns overlap nearlyidentically indicating that the sintering treatment or otherprocedures involved with the AlPO
4coating did not result
in distortion of the crystal lattice [5] This result showsthat the AlPO
4is just coated on the surface of the MoO
2
powders [24] Peaks between sim40ndash45∘ are characteristic ofgraphite [25] while the peaks at sim50∘ and sim74∘ correspondto the Cu-foil substrate (JCPDS card number 04-0836) [26]As we want to evaluate if there are significant changes in
ISRN Electrochemistry 5
Cou
nts (
k)56
49
42
35
28
21
14
OCMo
Mo
Mo
310 610 910 1210 1510 1810 2110 2410
Cu
Energy (keV)
(a)
Cou
nts (
k)
P
C
Mo
Mo
Energy (keV)
Cu
CuAl
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
7
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
(b)
Figure 3 X-ray Electron Dispersion Spectroscopy (XEDS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials
the lattice structure after cycling lithium cells were openedinside and argon-filled glove box to recover the electrodesThese electrodes were rinsed in EC dried under vacuumand studied exposed by XRD Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show theXRD data of the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2samples
after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge In thepristine sample (Figure 4(c)) a careful inspection revealsthat diffraction peaks evolved in the 25∘ndash35∘ 2theta rangeThis peak evolution corresponding to Li
2O formation during
lithiation process [27] may indicate a partial interchange ofoccupancy of Li+ and transition metal ions giving rise todisordering in the lattice structure due to an irreversible lossof oxygen during cycling [28]This interchange of occupancyis known to deteriorate the electrochemical performance ofthe layered material [29 30] Such peaks are not observedin the AlPO
4-coated sample (Figure 4(d)) This probably
suggests that the evenly dispersed AlPO4coating suppresses
microstructural defects and structural degradation acting asa protective coating layer and therefore enhancing structuralstability of MoO
2electrode material
32 Electrochemical Characterization
321 Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) Studies Cyclic voltammetry(CV) of pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2between 001ndash
25 V at a scan rate of 02mV sminus1 was performed at roomtemperature to understand the effect of AlPO
4coating on the
Li+ insertionextraction behavior of MoO2 Figure 5 shows
two pairs of redox peaks at sim123157V versus LiLi+ andsim150180V versus LiLi+ corresponding to the reversiblephase transition of Li
119909MoO2and MoO
2caused by the
insertion and extraction of lithium ions [3 31] According toprevious research [32 33] the two reactions correspondingto the two redox processes observed in the cyclic voltammo-grams in Figure 5 are as follows
MoO2+ 4Li+ + 4eminus 997888rarr Mo + 2Li
2O (1)
Mo + 119909Li+ + 119909eminus larrrarr Li119909MoO2
(2)
During discharge the lithium bonds to the oxygenin MoO
2 forming Mo metal and Li
2O Then the Mo
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2120579 (deg)
Inte
nsity
(au
)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(111
)
(211
)
(222
)
(031
)
(402
)(204
)(411
)(413
)
(132
)
Figure 4 X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) pristineMoO2and
(b) AlPO4-coated MoO
2before cycling and (c) pristine MoO
2and
(d) AlPO4-coatedMoO
2 Note the additional peaks of Li
2O (marked
by asterisk) after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge
partially alloysdealloys up to the theoretical limit ofLi119909MoO2(sim838mAhsdotgminus1) For pristine MoO
2(Figure 5(a))
oxidation peaks slightly shift to higher potentials while thereduction peaks slightly shift to lower potentials (indicatedwith arrows) In addition as cycling proceeds oxidationand reduction peak intensities decrease rapidly This elec-trochemical behavior indicates the structural degradationof MoO
2anode material and an increase in the internal
resistance during cycling leading to the fast capacity lossof the pristine MoO
2anode material [24 34] Electrodes
suffer from capacity loss and poor rate capability becausethere are incomplete reversible phase transition and localstructural damages during lithiation On the other handit is observed that the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2(Figure 5(b))
shows better cycling stability compared to pristine MoO2
During cycling almost no oxidation and reduction peakshifts are observed suggesting a more stable lattice structureFurthermore the peak intensity declines much slower thanthat of the pristine MoO
2 indicating that capacity retention
is noticeably enhanced after the AlPO4nanoparticle coating
2anode material at a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1
in the voltage range of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+
322 Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge Capacity StudiesTo study the electrochemical performance of pristine andAlPO
4-coated MoO
2 charge and discharge capacities were
measured at a potential window of 001ndash25 V at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 at room temperatureThe first charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO
4-
coated MoO2electrodes at a constant current density of
50mAsdotgminus1 are represented in Figure 6 The first cycle chargecapacity has been observed to be higher in the case of
the AlPO4-coated anode material (sim1008mAhsdotgminus1) com-
pared to the pristine anode material (sim625mAhsdotgminus1) Onthe other hand a higher first cycle discharge capacity isobserved in the case of AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2(sim1015mAhsdotgminus1)
compared to the pristine MoO2(sim650mAhsdotgminus1) These
enhanced first cycle charge and discharge capacities can beattributed to the effective removal of lithium and oxygenfrom the host structure [35] In both samples there are twoconstant potential plateaus at sim140 and 170V on the first
Figure 7 Initial charge and discharge curves of (a) pristineMoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2at current densities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1
between 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at room temperature
charge cycles as well as two potential plateaus at sim157 and13 V on the first discharge cycles These results are consistentwith those reported by Liang et al [33] since the inflectionpoints between these potential plateaus represent a transitionbetween monoclinic phase and orthogonal phase in thepartially Li
119909MoO2 It is clearly observed that surface modi-
fication with AlPO4nanoparticles can significantly improve
the electrochemical performance of MoO2anode material
PristineMoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity (IRC)
of 25mAhsdotgminus1 during the first cycle while the AlPO4-coated
MoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity of 7mAhsdotgminus1
during the first cycle The observed IRC and initial dischargecapacity values confirm that oxide ion vacancies are partiallyretained in the lattice during the initial charge In otherwords we can imply that surface modification suppresses theelimination of oxide ion vacanciesThis could be attributed tothe mechanism proposed by Armstrong et al [36] suggest-ing that surface modification suppresses the elimination ofoxygen vacancies during the initial charge and consequentlyallows a reversible insertionextraction of higher amountsof lithium in the subsequent discharge cycles [36] Figure 7shows the initial charge and discharge profiles of the pristineandAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2anodematerials at current densities
of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 As shown in Figure 7(a) theinitial discharge capacity of the pristineMoO
2is 434mAhsdotgminus1
at a current density of 100mAsdotgminus1 When the current densityis increased to 200mAsdotgminus1 pristineMoO
2only undergoes an
initial discharge capacity of 219mAhsdotgminus1 The pristine MoO2
exhibits a relatively poor rate capability Comparatively theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2exhibits an enhanced rate capability
as illustrated in Figure 7(b) The discharge capacities ofthe AlPO
4-coated MoO
2at current densities of 100 and
200mAsdotgminus1 are 647 and 341mAhsdotgminus1 respectively indicatingthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating significantly improves
rate capability The electrochemical data collected from thepristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes are denoted in
Table 1Now let us compare the cycle performance of pristine and
AlPO4-coated MoO
2electrodes considering the discharge
capacity as a function of cycle number for the first 50 cyclesas presented in Figure 8 At a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1pristine MoO
2exhibits an initial discharge capacity of
650mAhsdotgminus1 as discussed above It declines to 297mAhsdotgminus1after 50 cycles with a capacity loss of 54 By contrast theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrode delivers an initial discharge
capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 It declines to 787mAhsdotgminus1 after50 cycles with a capacity loss of 22 Rate capabilitycycling stability and discharge capacities of the AlPO
4-
coated samples are improved after 50 cycles compared to thepristine samplesHowever with ongoing cycling lithium ionscan eventually penetrate the coating protective layer thusbecoming incorporated into the lattice of MoO
2 This can be
ascribed to the gradual elimination of oxygen vacancies inthe anode material which can be part of the reason for thecapacity fading during cycling Generally this improvementin the discharge capacity rate capability and cycling stabilitycan be explained due to the obstruction of the transitionmetal ions by theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating tomigrate from
the surface to the bulk in the vacant sites for the lithiuminsertion thereforemaintaining the high concentration of theavailable sites for lithium insertion [10] The AlPO
4coating
is an electronic insulator as reported by Kim et al [22]indicating that most of the oxidation and reduction reactionswith lithium ions and electrons occur mainly at the interfacebetween the anode material and AlPO
4coating and not at
the interface of AlPO4coating and electrolyte From these
results we conclude that AlPO4-coated anode material holds
better cycling performance compared to the pristine anodematerial
8 ISRN Electrochemistry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
50mAmiddotgminus1
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
100mAmiddotgminus1
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
100
200
300
400
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
200mAmiddotgminus1
(c)
Figure 8 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number of pristine MoO2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
Table 1 Electrochemical data of galvanostatic charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO4-coated MoO2
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
Figure 3 X-ray Electron Dispersion Spectroscopy (XEDS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials
the lattice structure after cycling lithium cells were openedinside and argon-filled glove box to recover the electrodesThese electrodes were rinsed in EC dried under vacuumand studied exposed by XRD Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show theXRD data of the pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2samples
after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge In thepristine sample (Figure 4(c)) a careful inspection revealsthat diffraction peaks evolved in the 25∘ndash35∘ 2theta rangeThis peak evolution corresponding to Li
2O formation during
lithiation process [27] may indicate a partial interchange ofoccupancy of Li+ and transition metal ions giving rise todisordering in the lattice structure due to an irreversible lossof oxygen during cycling [28]This interchange of occupancyis known to deteriorate the electrochemical performance ofthe layered material [29 30] Such peaks are not observedin the AlPO
4-coated sample (Figure 4(d)) This probably
suggests that the evenly dispersed AlPO4coating suppresses
microstructural defects and structural degradation acting asa protective coating layer and therefore enhancing structuralstability of MoO
2electrode material
32 Electrochemical Characterization
321 Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) Studies Cyclic voltammetry(CV) of pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2between 001ndash
25 V at a scan rate of 02mV sminus1 was performed at roomtemperature to understand the effect of AlPO
4coating on the
Li+ insertionextraction behavior of MoO2 Figure 5 shows
two pairs of redox peaks at sim123157V versus LiLi+ andsim150180V versus LiLi+ corresponding to the reversiblephase transition of Li
119909MoO2and MoO
2caused by the
insertion and extraction of lithium ions [3 31] According toprevious research [32 33] the two reactions correspondingto the two redox processes observed in the cyclic voltammo-grams in Figure 5 are as follows
MoO2+ 4Li+ + 4eminus 997888rarr Mo + 2Li
2O (1)
Mo + 119909Li+ + 119909eminus larrrarr Li119909MoO2
(2)
During discharge the lithium bonds to the oxygenin MoO
2 forming Mo metal and Li
2O Then the Mo
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2120579 (deg)
Inte
nsity
(au
)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(111
)
(211
)
(222
)
(031
)
(402
)(204
)(411
)(413
)
(132
)
Figure 4 X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) pristineMoO2and
(b) AlPO4-coated MoO
2before cycling and (c) pristine MoO
2and
(d) AlPO4-coatedMoO
2 Note the additional peaks of Li
2O (marked
by asterisk) after 50 cycles of galvanostatic charge and discharge
partially alloysdealloys up to the theoretical limit ofLi119909MoO2(sim838mAhsdotgminus1) For pristine MoO
2(Figure 5(a))
oxidation peaks slightly shift to higher potentials while thereduction peaks slightly shift to lower potentials (indicatedwith arrows) In addition as cycling proceeds oxidationand reduction peak intensities decrease rapidly This elec-trochemical behavior indicates the structural degradationof MoO
2anode material and an increase in the internal
resistance during cycling leading to the fast capacity lossof the pristine MoO
2anode material [24 34] Electrodes
suffer from capacity loss and poor rate capability becausethere are incomplete reversible phase transition and localstructural damages during lithiation On the other handit is observed that the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2(Figure 5(b))
shows better cycling stability compared to pristine MoO2
During cycling almost no oxidation and reduction peakshifts are observed suggesting a more stable lattice structureFurthermore the peak intensity declines much slower thanthat of the pristine MoO
2 indicating that capacity retention
is noticeably enhanced after the AlPO4nanoparticle coating
2anode material at a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1
in the voltage range of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+
322 Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge Capacity StudiesTo study the electrochemical performance of pristine andAlPO
4-coated MoO
2 charge and discharge capacities were
measured at a potential window of 001ndash25 V at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 at room temperatureThe first charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO
4-
coated MoO2electrodes at a constant current density of
50mAsdotgminus1 are represented in Figure 6 The first cycle chargecapacity has been observed to be higher in the case of
the AlPO4-coated anode material (sim1008mAhsdotgminus1) com-
pared to the pristine anode material (sim625mAhsdotgminus1) Onthe other hand a higher first cycle discharge capacity isobserved in the case of AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2(sim1015mAhsdotgminus1)
compared to the pristine MoO2(sim650mAhsdotgminus1) These
enhanced first cycle charge and discharge capacities can beattributed to the effective removal of lithium and oxygenfrom the host structure [35] In both samples there are twoconstant potential plateaus at sim140 and 170V on the first
Figure 7 Initial charge and discharge curves of (a) pristineMoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2at current densities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1
between 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at room temperature
charge cycles as well as two potential plateaus at sim157 and13 V on the first discharge cycles These results are consistentwith those reported by Liang et al [33] since the inflectionpoints between these potential plateaus represent a transitionbetween monoclinic phase and orthogonal phase in thepartially Li
119909MoO2 It is clearly observed that surface modi-
fication with AlPO4nanoparticles can significantly improve
the electrochemical performance of MoO2anode material
PristineMoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity (IRC)
of 25mAhsdotgminus1 during the first cycle while the AlPO4-coated
MoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity of 7mAhsdotgminus1
during the first cycle The observed IRC and initial dischargecapacity values confirm that oxide ion vacancies are partiallyretained in the lattice during the initial charge In otherwords we can imply that surface modification suppresses theelimination of oxide ion vacanciesThis could be attributed tothe mechanism proposed by Armstrong et al [36] suggest-ing that surface modification suppresses the elimination ofoxygen vacancies during the initial charge and consequentlyallows a reversible insertionextraction of higher amountsof lithium in the subsequent discharge cycles [36] Figure 7shows the initial charge and discharge profiles of the pristineandAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2anodematerials at current densities
of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 As shown in Figure 7(a) theinitial discharge capacity of the pristineMoO
2is 434mAhsdotgminus1
at a current density of 100mAsdotgminus1 When the current densityis increased to 200mAsdotgminus1 pristineMoO
2only undergoes an
initial discharge capacity of 219mAhsdotgminus1 The pristine MoO2
exhibits a relatively poor rate capability Comparatively theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2exhibits an enhanced rate capability
as illustrated in Figure 7(b) The discharge capacities ofthe AlPO
4-coated MoO
2at current densities of 100 and
200mAsdotgminus1 are 647 and 341mAhsdotgminus1 respectively indicatingthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating significantly improves
rate capability The electrochemical data collected from thepristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes are denoted in
Table 1Now let us compare the cycle performance of pristine and
AlPO4-coated MoO
2electrodes considering the discharge
capacity as a function of cycle number for the first 50 cyclesas presented in Figure 8 At a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1pristine MoO
2exhibits an initial discharge capacity of
650mAhsdotgminus1 as discussed above It declines to 297mAhsdotgminus1after 50 cycles with a capacity loss of 54 By contrast theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrode delivers an initial discharge
capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 It declines to 787mAhsdotgminus1 after50 cycles with a capacity loss of 22 Rate capabilitycycling stability and discharge capacities of the AlPO
4-
coated samples are improved after 50 cycles compared to thepristine samplesHowever with ongoing cycling lithium ionscan eventually penetrate the coating protective layer thusbecoming incorporated into the lattice of MoO
2 This can be
ascribed to the gradual elimination of oxygen vacancies inthe anode material which can be part of the reason for thecapacity fading during cycling Generally this improvementin the discharge capacity rate capability and cycling stabilitycan be explained due to the obstruction of the transitionmetal ions by theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating tomigrate from
the surface to the bulk in the vacant sites for the lithiuminsertion thereforemaintaining the high concentration of theavailable sites for lithium insertion [10] The AlPO
4coating
is an electronic insulator as reported by Kim et al [22]indicating that most of the oxidation and reduction reactionswith lithium ions and electrons occur mainly at the interfacebetween the anode material and AlPO
4coating and not at
the interface of AlPO4coating and electrolyte From these
results we conclude that AlPO4-coated anode material holds
better cycling performance compared to the pristine anodematerial
8 ISRN Electrochemistry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
50mAmiddotgminus1
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
100mAmiddotgminus1
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
100
200
300
400
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
200mAmiddotgminus1
(c)
Figure 8 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number of pristine MoO2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
Table 1 Electrochemical data of galvanostatic charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO4-coated MoO2
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
2anode material at a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1
in the voltage range of 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+
322 Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge Capacity StudiesTo study the electrochemical performance of pristine andAlPO
4-coated MoO
2 charge and discharge capacities were
measured at a potential window of 001ndash25 V at currentdensities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 at room temperatureThe first charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO
4-
coated MoO2electrodes at a constant current density of
50mAsdotgminus1 are represented in Figure 6 The first cycle chargecapacity has been observed to be higher in the case of
the AlPO4-coated anode material (sim1008mAhsdotgminus1) com-
pared to the pristine anode material (sim625mAhsdotgminus1) Onthe other hand a higher first cycle discharge capacity isobserved in the case of AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2(sim1015mAhsdotgminus1)
compared to the pristine MoO2(sim650mAhsdotgminus1) These
enhanced first cycle charge and discharge capacities can beattributed to the effective removal of lithium and oxygenfrom the host structure [35] In both samples there are twoconstant potential plateaus at sim140 and 170V on the first
Figure 7 Initial charge and discharge curves of (a) pristineMoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2at current densities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1
between 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at room temperature
charge cycles as well as two potential plateaus at sim157 and13 V on the first discharge cycles These results are consistentwith those reported by Liang et al [33] since the inflectionpoints between these potential plateaus represent a transitionbetween monoclinic phase and orthogonal phase in thepartially Li
119909MoO2 It is clearly observed that surface modi-
fication with AlPO4nanoparticles can significantly improve
the electrochemical performance of MoO2anode material
PristineMoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity (IRC)
of 25mAhsdotgminus1 during the first cycle while the AlPO4-coated
MoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity of 7mAhsdotgminus1
during the first cycle The observed IRC and initial dischargecapacity values confirm that oxide ion vacancies are partiallyretained in the lattice during the initial charge In otherwords we can imply that surface modification suppresses theelimination of oxide ion vacanciesThis could be attributed tothe mechanism proposed by Armstrong et al [36] suggest-ing that surface modification suppresses the elimination ofoxygen vacancies during the initial charge and consequentlyallows a reversible insertionextraction of higher amountsof lithium in the subsequent discharge cycles [36] Figure 7shows the initial charge and discharge profiles of the pristineandAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2anodematerials at current densities
of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 As shown in Figure 7(a) theinitial discharge capacity of the pristineMoO
2is 434mAhsdotgminus1
at a current density of 100mAsdotgminus1 When the current densityis increased to 200mAsdotgminus1 pristineMoO
2only undergoes an
initial discharge capacity of 219mAhsdotgminus1 The pristine MoO2
exhibits a relatively poor rate capability Comparatively theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2exhibits an enhanced rate capability
as illustrated in Figure 7(b) The discharge capacities ofthe AlPO
4-coated MoO
2at current densities of 100 and
200mAsdotgminus1 are 647 and 341mAhsdotgminus1 respectively indicatingthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating significantly improves
rate capability The electrochemical data collected from thepristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes are denoted in
Table 1Now let us compare the cycle performance of pristine and
AlPO4-coated MoO
2electrodes considering the discharge
capacity as a function of cycle number for the first 50 cyclesas presented in Figure 8 At a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1pristine MoO
2exhibits an initial discharge capacity of
650mAhsdotgminus1 as discussed above It declines to 297mAhsdotgminus1after 50 cycles with a capacity loss of 54 By contrast theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrode delivers an initial discharge
capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 It declines to 787mAhsdotgminus1 after50 cycles with a capacity loss of 22 Rate capabilitycycling stability and discharge capacities of the AlPO
4-
coated samples are improved after 50 cycles compared to thepristine samplesHowever with ongoing cycling lithium ionscan eventually penetrate the coating protective layer thusbecoming incorporated into the lattice of MoO
2 This can be
ascribed to the gradual elimination of oxygen vacancies inthe anode material which can be part of the reason for thecapacity fading during cycling Generally this improvementin the discharge capacity rate capability and cycling stabilitycan be explained due to the obstruction of the transitionmetal ions by theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating tomigrate from
the surface to the bulk in the vacant sites for the lithiuminsertion thereforemaintaining the high concentration of theavailable sites for lithium insertion [10] The AlPO
4coating
is an electronic insulator as reported by Kim et al [22]indicating that most of the oxidation and reduction reactionswith lithium ions and electrons occur mainly at the interfacebetween the anode material and AlPO
4coating and not at
the interface of AlPO4coating and electrolyte From these
results we conclude that AlPO4-coated anode material holds
better cycling performance compared to the pristine anodematerial
8 ISRN Electrochemistry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
50mAmiddotgminus1
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
100mAmiddotgminus1
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
100
200
300
400
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
200mAmiddotgminus1
(c)
Figure 8 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number of pristine MoO2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
Table 1 Electrochemical data of galvanostatic charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO4-coated MoO2
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
Figure 7 Initial charge and discharge curves of (a) pristineMoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coatedMoO
2at current densities of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1
between 001ndash25 V versus LiLi+ at room temperature
charge cycles as well as two potential plateaus at sim157 and13 V on the first discharge cycles These results are consistentwith those reported by Liang et al [33] since the inflectionpoints between these potential plateaus represent a transitionbetween monoclinic phase and orthogonal phase in thepartially Li
119909MoO2 It is clearly observed that surface modi-
fication with AlPO4nanoparticles can significantly improve
the electrochemical performance of MoO2anode material
PristineMoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity (IRC)
of 25mAhsdotgminus1 during the first cycle while the AlPO4-coated
MoO2electrode shows an irreversible capacity of 7mAhsdotgminus1
during the first cycle The observed IRC and initial dischargecapacity values confirm that oxide ion vacancies are partiallyretained in the lattice during the initial charge In otherwords we can imply that surface modification suppresses theelimination of oxide ion vacanciesThis could be attributed tothe mechanism proposed by Armstrong et al [36] suggest-ing that surface modification suppresses the elimination ofoxygen vacancies during the initial charge and consequentlyallows a reversible insertionextraction of higher amountsof lithium in the subsequent discharge cycles [36] Figure 7shows the initial charge and discharge profiles of the pristineandAlPO
4-coatedMoO
2anodematerials at current densities
of 50 100 and 200mAsdotgminus1 As shown in Figure 7(a) theinitial discharge capacity of the pristineMoO
2is 434mAhsdotgminus1
at a current density of 100mAsdotgminus1 When the current densityis increased to 200mAsdotgminus1 pristineMoO
2only undergoes an
initial discharge capacity of 219mAhsdotgminus1 The pristine MoO2
exhibits a relatively poor rate capability Comparatively theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2exhibits an enhanced rate capability
as illustrated in Figure 7(b) The discharge capacities ofthe AlPO
4-coated MoO
2at current densities of 100 and
200mAsdotgminus1 are 647 and 341mAhsdotgminus1 respectively indicatingthat the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating significantly improves
rate capability The electrochemical data collected from thepristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrodes are denoted in
Table 1Now let us compare the cycle performance of pristine and
AlPO4-coated MoO
2electrodes considering the discharge
capacity as a function of cycle number for the first 50 cyclesas presented in Figure 8 At a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1pristine MoO
2exhibits an initial discharge capacity of
650mAhsdotgminus1 as discussed above It declines to 297mAhsdotgminus1after 50 cycles with a capacity loss of 54 By contrast theAlPO
4-coated MoO
2electrode delivers an initial discharge
capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 It declines to 787mAhsdotgminus1 after50 cycles with a capacity loss of 22 Rate capabilitycycling stability and discharge capacities of the AlPO
4-
coated samples are improved after 50 cycles compared to thepristine samplesHowever with ongoing cycling lithium ionscan eventually penetrate the coating protective layer thusbecoming incorporated into the lattice of MoO
2 This can be
ascribed to the gradual elimination of oxygen vacancies inthe anode material which can be part of the reason for thecapacity fading during cycling Generally this improvementin the discharge capacity rate capability and cycling stabilitycan be explained due to the obstruction of the transitionmetal ions by theAlPO
4nanoparticle coating tomigrate from
the surface to the bulk in the vacant sites for the lithiuminsertion thereforemaintaining the high concentration of theavailable sites for lithium insertion [10] The AlPO
4coating
is an electronic insulator as reported by Kim et al [22]indicating that most of the oxidation and reduction reactionswith lithium ions and electrons occur mainly at the interfacebetween the anode material and AlPO
4coating and not at
the interface of AlPO4coating and electrolyte From these
results we conclude that AlPO4-coated anode material holds
better cycling performance compared to the pristine anodematerial
8 ISRN Electrochemistry
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
50mAmiddotgminus1
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
100mAmiddotgminus1
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
100
200
300
400
Cycle number
Disc
harg
e cap
acity
(mA
hmiddotgminus
1)
AlPO4-coated MoO2
Pristine MoO2
200mAmiddotgminus1
(c)
Figure 8 Discharge capacity as a function of cycle number of pristine MoO2and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
Table 1 Electrochemical data of galvanostatic charge and discharge cycles for pristine and AlPO4-coated MoO2
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
Figure 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a) pristine MoO2and (b) AlPO
4-coated MoO
2with an applied AC signal
amplitude of 5mV peak-to-peak over a frequency range of 1MHz to 10mHz EIS data were obtained after 3 cycles of galvanostatic charge anddischarge at room temperature
323 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) To bet-ter understand the reason for the enhanced electrochemi-cal properties of the AlPO
4nanoparticle coating electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out forthe pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2anode materials The
electrochemical impedance data were obtained after 3 cyclesof galvanostatic charge and discharge at room temperaturesince the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film is formed dur-ing the first few cycles and changes very little during ongoingcycling [37] EIS is an effective nondestructive technique tounderstand the various phenomena occurring at the interfacebetween the electrode and electrolyte It is used to determineelectrochemical cell impedance in response to a small ACsignal at constant DC voltage over a broad frequency rangefromMHz to mHz [38] Impedance spectroscopy is a crucialparameter to determine the electrochemical performance oflithium ion batteries With this characterization techniquedifferent electrochemical processes occurring inside lithiumion batteries such as charge transfer double layer capaci-tance and diffusion of ions in the electrode can be studiedby calculating the real and imaginary parts of the impedanceEIS measurements have been carried out on the lithium ionbatteries to examine the electrochemical systems involvinginterfacial processes and kinetics of electrode reactions forthe pristine MoO
2and the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2 The results
are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b) respectively in the formofNyquist plots Determining the possible equivalent circuit inorder to interpret the data is crucial in this electrochemicalcharacterization technique [39] The equivalent circuit usedfor fitting the impedance data is shown in Figure 10 From
Re
RctZw
Rsl
CPECPE
Figure 10 Equivalent circuit model for the EIS where CPE arethe constant phase elements119877emdashelectrolyte resistance119877slmdashsurfacelayer resistance 119877ctmdashcharge transfer resistance and 119885wmdashWarburgimpedance
the Nyquist plots it can be perceived that they are composedof two parts The first one is a suppressed semicircle inthe high-middle frequency region related to charge-transferprocess and the second one is an oblique straight linein the low frequency region representing typical Warburgimpedance
The suppression of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots isdue to the overlap of two different semicircles The appear-ance of two suppressed semicircles indicates the contributionof two different resistive elements to the total impedanceof the electrochemical cell This is observed generally inthe impedance plot due to the combination of a capacitorelement and a resistor element in parallel The semicircle inthe high frequency region corresponds to the resistance (119877sl)due to the surface layer or solid electrolyte interface (SEI)formation [40] Capacity fading of the anode material duringcycling is associated with the thickness of such layer on theanode particles During cycling the SEI layer grows thick due
10 ISRN Electrochemistry
Table 2 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data parameters obtained after fitting based on the model shown in Figure 10
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
to the electrodeelectrolyte reaction thus deteriorating theelectrochemical performance of the cell Middle frequencysemicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (119877ct)across the interface and the low frequency oblique straightline arises due to the lithium ion diffusion in the bulk ofthe anode material [41] The intercept value on the 119909-axisin the high frequency region corresponds to the resistance(119877e) due to the lithium ion conduction in the electrolyte[41] Depression in the semicircle has been calculated byplacing constant phase elements (CPEs) instead of purecapacitance as shown in the equivalent circuit Impedanceparameters obtained after fitting the EIS experimental dataare summarized in Table 2
By analyzing the datawe observed that themain influenceto the impedance is from the charge transfer resistance(119877ct) and surface layer resistance (119877sl) 119877e behavior has beenobserved to be similar in both samples In the charged stateit is observed that the 119877ct value for the AlPO4-coated MoO
2
is lower compared to that of the pristine MoO2 and an
increase in 119877sl is observed respectively This increase in thevalue of 119877sl is expected due to the growth of the SEI layer atthe electrodeelectrolyte interface In the case of the AlPO
4-
coated sample the decrease in the 119877ct value can be explaineddue to the fact that during cycling irreversible extractionof the oxygen and lithium occurs creating vacancies inthe crystal structure of the anode material and thereforeleading to the decrease in the charge transfer resistance [42]The decrease in 119877ct is helpful for improving the electronkinetics of the anode material and hence enhancing theelectrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode material
for lithium ion batteries [43] On the other hand in thedischarged state we observed that both 119877ct and 119877sl fromthe AlPO
4-coated sample are relatively low compared to the
pristine sample Charge transfer process is considered to bea rate determining process and the rate performance of theanode material particularly depends on the 119877ct [40] AlPO4nanoparticle coating can support reducing the increase incharge transfer resistance and therefore implying a betterrate performance compared to the pristine sample Theseresults are consistent with previous studies indicating thatcharge transfer resistance decreases significantly with theincorporation of coatings [41 44]
4 Conclusions
MoO2anode material has been successfully coated by AlPO
4
nanoparticles and the AlPO4-coated electrode displays an
enhancement in cycle-life performance The AlPO4coating
significantly reduces the formation of surface cracks induced
by the volume expansion of MoO2anode material diminish-
ing the repetitive formation of electrodeelectrolyte interfacesthat affects the capacity fading Electrochemical performanceof pristine and AlPO
4-coated MoO
2has been studied by
galvanostatic charge and discharge cyclic voltammetry (CV)and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in thevoltage range of 001ndash25 V indicating that the AlPO
4-coated
MoO2exhibits enhanced rate capability and excellent cycle
stability Galvanostatic charge and discharge measurementsat a current density of 50mAsdotgminus1 reveal that pristine MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 650mAhsdotgminus1 and 54capacity loss in 50 cycles while the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2
exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 1015mAhsdotgminus1 andonly 22 capacity loss at 50 cycles Cyclic voltammetrystudies indicate that the improvement in cycling performanceof the AlPO
4-coated MoO
2that is attributed to the stabi-
lization of the lattice structure due to the suppression of theelimination of oxygen vacancies from the anode materialElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows thatthe AlPO
4nanoparticle coating reduces the surface layer and
charge transfer resistance Surface modification with AlPO4
nanoparticles is an effective way to improve the structuralstability and electrochemical performance of MoO
2as anode
material for lithium ion batteries
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
This research project was carried out under the auspicesof the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grantno 1002410) This research was also supported in part byNSF GK-12 (NSF Grant no 0841338) PR NASA EPSCoR(NNX13AB22A) PR NASA Space Grant (NNX10AM80H)and NASA Center for Advanced Nanoscale Materials(NNX08BA48A) The authors gratefully acknowledge theinstrumentation and technical support of the NanoscopyFacility (Dr M Guinel) the XRD and Glovebox Facilities(Dr R S Katiyar) and helpful discussions with Dr VladimirMakarov
References
[1] B Scrosati ldquoRecent advances in lithium ion battery materialsrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 45 no 15-16 pp 2461ndash2466 2000
ISRN Electrochemistry 11
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
[2] B Kang and G Ceder ldquoBattery materials for ultrafast chargingand dischargingrdquo Nature vol 458 no 7235 pp 190ndash193 2009
[3] Q Tang Z Shan L Wang and X Qin ldquoMoO2-graphene
nanocomposite as anode material for lithium-ion batteriesrdquoElectrochimica Acta vol 79 pp 148ndash153 2012
[4] V Pralong ldquoLithium intercalation into transition metal oxidesa route to generate new ordered rock salt type structurerdquoProgress in Solid State Chemistry vol 37 no 4 pp 262ndash2772009
[5] W C West J Soler M C Smart et al ldquoElectrochemicalbehavior of layered solid solution Li
2MnO
3-LiMO
2(MNi Mn
Co) li-ion cathodes with andwithout alumina coatingsrdquo Journalof the Electrochemical Society vol 158 no 8 pp A883ndashA8892011
[6] J Sun X Ma C Wang and X Han ldquoEffect of AlPO4coating
on the electrochemical properties of LiNi08Co02O2cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Alloys and Compounds vol 453 no 1-2 pp352ndash355 2008
[7] S T Myung and K Izumi ldquoRole of alumina coating onLiminusNiminusCominusMnminusO particles as positive electrode material forlithium-ion batteriesrdquo Chemistry of Materials vol 17 pp 3695ndash3704 2005
[8] A M Kannan L Rabenberg and A Manthiram ldquoHigh capa-city surface-modified LiCoO
2cathodes for lithium-ion batter-
iesrdquoElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters vol 6 no 1 ppA16ndashA18 2003
[9] H Cao B J Xia Y Zhang and N X Xu ldquoLiAlO2-coated
LiCoO2as cathodematerial for lithium ion batteriesrdquo Solid State
Ionics vol 176 no 9-10 pp 911ndash914 2005[10] Y Wu and A Manthiram ldquoEffect of surface modifications on
the layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li13Mn23]O2minus (z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[11] J Ying C Wan and C Jiang ldquoSurface treatment of LiNi
08
Co02O2cathodematerial for lithium secondary batteriesrdquo Jour-
nal of Power Sources vol 102 no 1-2 pp 162ndash166 2001[12] A M Kannan and A Manthiram ldquoSurfacechemically modi-
fied LiMn2O4cathodes for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Electrochem-
ical and Solid-State Letters vol 5 no 7 pp A167ndashA169 2002[13] B Hu X Wang Y Wang et al ldquoEffects of amorphous AlPO
4
coating on the electrochemical performance of BiF3cathode
materials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Power Sources vol 218 pp204ndash211 2012
[14] J Cho Y-W Kim B Kim J-G Lee and B Park ldquoA break-through in the safety of lithium secondary batteries by coatingthe cathode material with AIPO4 nanoparticlesrdquo AngewandteChemie (International Edition) vol 42 no 14 pp 1618ndash16212003
[15] K S Tan M V Reddy G V S Rao and B V R Cho-wardi ldquoEffect of AlPO
4-coating on cathodic behaviour of
Li(Ni08Co02)O2rdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 141 pp 129ndash142
2005[16] J Y Shi C-W Yi and K Kim ldquoImproved electrochemical
performance of AlPO4-coated LiMn
15Ni05O4electrode for
lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 195 no 19pp 6860ndash6866 2010
[17] L F Jiao L Liu J L Sun et al ldquoEffect of AlPO4nanowire
coating on the electrochemical properties of LiV3O8cathode
materialrdquo Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol 112 no 46 pp18249ndash18254 2008
[18] A Manthiram and Y Wu ldquoEffect of surface modifications onthe layered solid solution cathodes (1-z) Li[Li
13Mn23]O2-(z)
Li[Mn05minus119910
Ni05minus119910
Co2119910]O2rdquo Solid State Ion vol 180 pp 50ndash56
2009[19] J Cho ldquoCorrelation between AlPO
4nanoparticle coating thick-
ness on LiCoO2cathode and thermal stabilityrdquo Electrochimica
Acta vol 48 no 19 pp 2807ndash2811 2003[20] Y M Sun X L Hu W Luo and Y H Huang ldquoSelf-assembled
hierarchicalMoO2graphene nanoarchitectures and their appli-
cation as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ionbatteriesrdquo ACS Nano vol 5 no 9 pp 7100ndash7107 2011
[21] P Poizot S Laruelle S Grugeon L Dupont and J-M Taras-con ldquoNano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrodematerials for lithium-ion batteriesrdquo Nature vol 407 no 6803pp 496ndash499 2000
[22] T-J Kim D Son J Cho B Park and H Yang ldquoEnhancedelectrochemical properties of SnO
2anode by AlPO
4coatingrdquo
Electrochimica Acta vol 49 no 25 pp 4405ndash4410 2004[23] Y-K Sun S-W Cho S-W Lee C S Yoon and K Amine
ldquoAlF3-coating to improve high voltage cycling performanceof Li[Ni
13Co13Mn13]O2cathode materials for lithium sec-
ondary batteriesrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 154no 3 pp A168ndashA172 2007
[24] D Liu Z He and X Liu ldquoIncreased cycling stability of AlPO4-
coated LiMn2O4for lithium ion batteriesrdquoMaterials Letters vol
61 no 25 pp 4703ndash4706 2007[25] H Shi J Barker M Y Saıdi and R Koksbang ldquoStructure
and lithium intercalation properties of synthetic and naturalgraphiterdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 143 no 11pp 3466ndash3472 1996
[26] T Theivasanthi and M Alagar ldquoX-ray diffraction studies ofcopper nanopowderrdquoArchives of Physics Research vol 1 pp 112ndash117 2010
[27] C-H Doh H-M Shin D-H Kim et al ldquoImproved anodeperformance of thermally treated SiOC composite with anorganic solution mixturerdquo Electrochemistry Communicationsvol 10 no 2 pp 233ndash237 2008
[28] Z H Lu and J R Dahn ldquoUnderstanding the anomalouscapacity of Li Li [ Ni
119909Li(1 3 minus 2119909 3)
Mn(2 3 minus 119909 3)
] O2cells using
in situ x-ray diffraction and electrochemical studiesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 149 pp A815ndashA822 2002
[29] C P Grey W-S Yoon J Reed and G Ceder ldquoElectrochemi-cal activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O
3
Li[Li(1minus2119909)3
Mn(2minus119909)3
Ni119909]O2rdquo Electrochemical and Solid-State
Letters vol 7 no 9 pp A290ndashA293 2004[30] J R Mueller-Neuhaus R A Dunlap and J R Dahn ldquoUnder-
standing irreversible capacity in Li119909Ni1minus120574
Fe1minus120574
O2cathodemate-
rialsrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 147 no 10 pp3598ndash3605 2000
[31] W Luo X Hu Y Sun and Y Huang ldquoElectrospinningof carbon-coated MoO
2nanofibers with enhanced lithium-
storage propertiesrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 13pp 16735ndash16740 2011
[32] J R Dahn and W R McKinnon ldquoStructure and electrochem-istry of LixMoO
2rdquo Solid State Ionics vol 23 no 1-2 pp 1ndash7 1987
[33] Y Liang J Sun S Yang Z Yi and Y Zhou ldquoPreparation char-acterization and lithium-intercalation performance of differentmorphological molybdenum dioxiderdquoMaterials Chemistry andPhysics vol 93 pp 395ndash398 2005
[34] B-C Park H-B Kim S-T Myung et al ldquoImprovementof structural and electrochemical properties of AlF
3-coated
12 ISRN Electrochemistry
Li[Ni13Co13Mn13]O2
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008
cathode materials on high voltageregionrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 178 no 2 pp 826ndash8312008
[35] G Singh R Thomas A Kumar R S Katiyar and A Mani-vannan ldquoElectrochemical and structural investigations onZnO treated 05 Li
2MnO
3-05LiMn
05Ni05O2layered composite
cathode material for lithium ion batteryrdquo Journal of the Electro-chemical Society vol 159 no 4 pp A470ndashA478 2012
[36] A R Armstrong M Holzapfel P Novak M Thackerayand P Bruce ldquoDemonstrating oxygen loss and associatedstructural reorganization in the lithium battery cathodeLi[Ni
02Li02Mn06]O6rdquo Journal of the American Chemical Soci-
ety vol 128 pp 8694ndash88698 2006[37] G Li Z Yang and W Yang ldquoEffect of FePO
4coating on
electrochemical and safety performance of LiCoCO2as cathode
material for Li-ion batteriesrdquo Journal of Power Sources vol 183no 2 pp 741ndash748 2008
[38] B V Ratnakumar M C Smart and S Surampudi ldquoElec-trochemical impedance spectroscopy and its applications tolithium ion cellsrdquo ChemInform vol 33 p 229 2009
[39] M D Levi D Aurbach G Salitra et al ldquoSolid-state elec-trochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li
1minus119909CoO2
simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCVPITT and EISrdquo Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol 146no 4 pp 1279ndash1289 1999
[40] G Ning B Haran and B N Popov ldquoCapacity fade study oflithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge ratesrdquo Journal ofPower Sources vol 117 no 1-2 pp 160ndash169 2003
[41] J Liu and A Manthiram ldquoUnderstanding the improvementin the electrochemical properties of surface modified 5 VLiMn
142Ni042
Co016
O4spinel cathodes in lithium-ion cellsrdquo
Chemistry of Materials vol 21 pp 1695ndash1707 2009[42] S Sivaprakash and S B Majumder ldquoSpectroscopic analy-
ses of 05Li[Ni08Co015
Zr005
]O2-05Li[Li
13Mn23]O2compos-
ite cathodes for lithium rechargeable batteriesrdquo Solid StateIonics vol 181 no 15-16 pp 730ndash739 2010
[43] A Chen C Li R Tang L Yin and Y Qi ldquoMoO2-ordered
mesoporous carbon hybrids as anode materials with highlyimproved rate capability and reversible capacity for lithium-ionbatteryrdquo Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol 15 pp 13601ndash13610 2013
[44] M C Smart B L Lucht and B V Ratnakumar ldquoElec-trochemical characteristics of MCMB and LiNix Co
1minus119909O2
electrodes in electrolytes with stabilizing additivesrdquo Journal ofthe Electrochemical Society vol 155 no 8 pp A557ndashA568 2008