Depersonalization and OBEs: Relationships with Dream, Parapsychological, and Synesthesia Experiences, Life Satisfaction and Hallucinations Nancy L. Zingrone, Ph.D. Carlos S. Alvarado, Ph.D. Natasha Agee, B.A.
Jun 25, 2015
Depersonalization and OBEs: Relationships with Dream,
Parapsychological, and Synesthesia Experiences, Life
Satisfaction and Hallucinations
Nancy L. Zingrone, Ph.D.Carlos S. Alvarado, Ph.D.
Natasha Agee, B.A.
Two Studies
• Stratified Random Survey of Charlottesville, VA
• 2400 questionnaires mailed
• 19% returned undeliverable
• 256 usable datasets returned = 13% response rate
• Web-based survey, volunteers solicited from transpersonal psychology and parapsychology sites
• 667 datasets received
• 597 usable
Study 1: Postal Study 2: Web
Objectives: To compare OBErs to Non-OBErs
on the following• Scores on the Cambridge Depersonalisation
Scale (CDS)
• Scores on specific items
• Incidence of particular OBE Features in “high” and “low” scorers on the CDS
• Relationship between OBEs and depersonalization, hallucination experiences, dream variables, synesthesias and psi exeriences
• Scale scores and rates of endorsement by respondents to the Postal Survey and respondents to the Web-based survey
Demographics
• 62.5% Female• 37.5% Male
• Mean Age = 49.29 ± 18.70, Range = 17 to 95
• 90.5 % White• 5.1% Black• 2.0% Mixed• 1.6% Asian• .4% Hispanic• .4% Celtic
• 64.7% Female• 35.3% Male
• Mean Age = 45.27 ± 14.15, Range = 13 to 84
• 87.8% White• 3.7% Hispanic• 2.9% Mixed• 1.7% Asian• 1.4% Black• 1% Indian (South Asia)• .7% Native American• .4% Arabic• .2% Albanian• .2% Sri Lankan
Study 1: Postal
Sex & Age N = 256Ethnicity N = 253
Study 2: WebSex N = 589 / Age N = 587
Ethnicity N = 575
Demographics
• 51.8% Married• 25.1% Single• 11% Divorced• 6.7% Widowed• 5.1% Living together• .3% Separated
• 25.2% Masters• 24.8% Bachelors• 15.3% Some college• 7.9% High School• 6.6% Some grad
school• 6.2% Doctorates• 14% Other
• 43.6% Married• 27.5% Single• 14.4% Divorced• 10.3% Living together• 22.6% Widowed• 1.7% Separated
• 27.9% Some college• 24% Bachelors• 13% Masters• 8.8% Doctorates• 7.1% High School• 5.7% Some grad
school• 13.5% Other
Study 1: PostalMarital Status N = 255
Education N = 242
Study 2: WebMarital Status N = 585
Education N = 509
Demographics
• 68.4% Christian• 12.3% None• 5.7% Agnostic• 4.4% Mixed or
Miscellaneous• 3.5% Atheist• 3.1% Buddhist• 2.6% Jewish
• 37.4% Christian• 22% Agnostic• 17.1% None• 5% Miscellaneous• 4.3% Pagan• 4.1% Buddhist• 3.7% Mixed• 2.7% Jewish• 2.7% Hindu• 1% Atheist
Study 1: PostalN = 228
Study 2: WebN = 486
Religiousness
• 22.9% Not at all• 24.1% Slightly• 34.8% Moderately• 18.2 Very
• Range = 0 to 3• Mean =
1.48±1.04
• 28.8% Not at all• 29.3% Slightly• 29.2% Moderately• 12.7% Very
• Range = 0 to 3• Mean =
1.26±1.01
Study 1: PostalN = 253
Study 2: WebN = 583
Headaches & Head Injuries
• 18.4% never had a headache
• 44.5% rarely• 28% occasionally• 7.4% frequently• 1.2% most of the
time
• 13.7% had suffered a head injury
• 9% never had a headache
• 48.7% rarely• 18.6% occasionally• 20.2% frequency• 3.5% most of the time
• 19.5% had suffered a head injury
Study 1: PostalN = 256
Study 2: WebHeadache N= 560
Head Injury N = 565
Main Questionnaires• CDS Scale (Sierra & Berrios, 2000)• Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener et al, 1985)
Items we developed• Dream recall, Lucid dreams, Disturbing dreams,
Psi Experiences (adapted from Palmer, 1979)• Interference of depersonalization experiences with
work, relationships, sense of self• Depersonalization experiences and flourescent
lights• Synesthesia of color with sounds or music• Synesthesia of color with letters or numbers
Follow-up Questionnaires• Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale (Larøi & Vander
Linden, 2005)• Short Form OBE Questionnaire (Alvarado, 1997)
Representativeness of Postal Sample
Stratification held but …Study 1 Census
EthnicityWhites 90.5% 72.3%African Americans 5.1% 20.8%“Other” 4.4% 16.9%
AgeAge below 18 .4% 18.9%Ages between 18 and 65 76.6% 67.5%Ages above 65 22% 13.6%
SexMales 37.5% 46.9%Females 62.5% 53.1%
EducationHigh school degree or better 97.1% 80.8%Baccalaureat degree or better 68.6%
40.8%
Order Effects
OBE frequency– Form A (N = 125)
• Mean = .36– Form B (N = 127)
• Mean = .71• z = 2.38, p = .02
Lucid dreams– Form A (N = 126)
• Mean = 1.28– Form B (N = 127)
• Mean = .93• z = 2.12, p =.03
OBE frequency– Form A (N = 264)
• Mean = 1.10– Form B (N = 260)
• Mean = 1.28• z = 1.88, p = .06
Déjà Vu– Form A (N = 257)
• Mean = 1.94– Form B (N = 263)
• Mean = .86• z = 2.75, p = .006
Study 1: Postal Study 2: Web
Parapsychological Experiences & Dream Variables
Experience N Yes
OBEs 253 37.5%Waking ESP 253 50.2%Dream ESP 252 49.2%Apparitions 253 34%Aura 253 10.7%
Dream Recall 254 96.9%Disturbing Dreams 252 92.9%Lucid Dreams 254 70.9%
Experience N Yes
OBEs 524 67.2%Waking ESP 524 84.5%Dream ESP 528 82%Apparitions 528 80.3%Aura 527 54.1%
Dream Recall 532 99.4%Disturbing Dreams 531 98.1%Lucid Dreams 530 89.2%
Study 1: Postal Study 2: Web
Internet respondents reported significantly more of all the above atthe p < .0001 level, except dream recall which is p < .004.
Other Experiences, Headaches & Head Injuries
Experience N Yes
Déjà Vu 252 82.5%Sense of Oneness 253 58.9%
Seeing colors music/sound 254 22.4% letters/numbers 251 13.9%
Headache 256 81.6%Head Injury 35 13.7%
Experience N Yes
Déjà Vu 520 94.8%Sense of Oneness 527 90.3%
Seeing colors music/sound 522 45.8% letters/numbers 525 33.7%
Headache 565 91%Head Injury 109 19.5%
Study 1: Postal Study 2: Web
In all of the above except Head Injury, Web respondents reportedsignificantly more of the experiences at the p < .0001 level. Head Injury was significant at p = .044.
Scale Scores & Indexes
Study 1 : Postal Study 2: Web
N Mean Range N Mean Range
CDS* 256 20.13 0-93 591 37.18 0-279
SWLS* 256 25.17 0-35 597 20.39 0-34
LSHS* 43 16.63 0-48 76 35.11 3-63
Psi Index* 256 1.79 0-5 597 3.24 0-5
OBE Feature*** 11 6.91 0-18 61 4.46 0-28
OBE Transformation Score** 11 1.55 0-6 61 3.53 0-8
* p < .0001, ** p = .035, *** = n.s.
OBE Frequency & CDS Score
Study N rs p
Postal Respondents 253 .49<.0001
Web Respondents 524 .37<.0001
CDS Scores for OBErs vs Non-OBErs
Mean
Study N CDS Score z p
OBErs Postal 95 31.13Non-OBErs Postal 158 13.49 6.51
< .0001
OBErs Web 350 47.48Non-OBErs Web 168 26.49 6.83
< .0001
SWLS Scores for OBErs vs Non-OBErs
MeanSWLS
Study N Score z p
OBErs Postal 95 24.61Non-OBErs Postal 158 25.59 1.985 < .047
OBErs Web 350 21.32Non-OBErs Web 172 22.06 1.19 < .231
LSHS Scale Scores for OBErs vs Non-OBErs
MeanLSHS
Study N Score z p
OBErs Postal 14 20.14Non-OBErs Postal 29 14.93 1.09 < .276
OBErs Web 53 38.42Non-OBErs Web 23 27.48 3.02 < .003
Correlations between OBE Frequency and the Other Experiences
Study 1 : PostalStudy 2: Web
Variable N rs N rs
Age 251 .03 518 .04
Education 239 .08 466 -.06
Religiousness 250 .17 515 .12
Headaches 253 .23* 522 .23*
SWLS 253 .05 524 -.01
LSHS 43 .31 76 .62*
*p < .0001
Correlations between OBE Frequency and the Other Experiences continued
Study 1 : PostalStudy 2: Web
Variable N rs N rs
Waking ESP 252 .46* 520 .55*Dream ESP 251 .42* 521 .48*Apparitions 252 .52* 523 .53*Auras 252 .59* 520 .54*OBE Feature Index 253 .65* 61 .49*OBE Transformation Index 253 .64* 61 .54*Psi Experiences w/o OBE item 253 .61* 524 .52*
Correlations between OBE Frequency and the Other Experiences continued
Study 1 : Postal Study 2: Web
Variable N rs N rs
Sense of oneness 252 .36* 520 .48*Déjà Vu 251 .38* 510 .42*Dream recall 253 .28* 524 .29*Disturbing dreams 251 .27* 524 .24*Lucid dreams 253 .36* 523 .481*Seeing colors while hearing sounds, music, voices 253 .52* 520 .49*Seeing colors while seeing, hearing, or thinking about letters or numbers 250 .55* 521 .54*
* P < .0001
Significant Differences between Studies on Features of the OBE Experience
Study 1: Postal Study 2: Web Fisher
OBE Features N % N % Exact
Able to pass through matter 10 0 48 45.8 .005
Illumination while out not normal light 10 0 52 40.4 .01
Sensation of rising while going out 9 66.7 50 38 .08
Looking down while out 9 66.7 54 40.7 .10
OBE Transformation Items
Study 1: Postal Study 2 : Web(N = 11) (N = 61)
% Yes % YesYourself 27.3 56
Human Nature 9.1 48
Communication with others 18.2 43
Material Wealth 9.1 28
Society 0 36
Life 27.3 49
Death 27.3 53
God 27.3 41
Other 9.1 0
Study 1 OBE Transformation Score was 1.55, significantly lower than the Study 2 OBE Transformation Score of 3.53, p < .0001.
Relationship of CDS Score to OBE Feature Index
& OBE Transformation Score
Study 1: Postal Study 2: Web
N rs p N rs p
CDS Score to:
OBE Feature Index 11 -.15 ns 61 .32
.013
OBE Transformation Score 11 -.13 ns 61 .42
.001
Relationship of LSHS Score to OBE Feature Index
& OBE Transformation ScoreStudy 1: Postal Study 2:
WebN rs p N rs p
LSHS Score to:
OBE Feature Index 9 .52 ns 61 .46
.001
OBE Transformation Score 9 .05 ns 61 .47
.001
Logistic Regression: CDS Items as Predictorsof OBE Group Membership
Study 1: PostalN = 253
Standard TVariable Coefficient Error Ratio p
Item 6. Detached observer of self .391 .149 2.63 .009
Item 24. Feeling “robotic” .625 .241 2.59 .01
Item 15. Autoscopy 1.008 .404 2.50 .013
Item 17. Déjà Vu -.333 .142 -2.31 .019
Item 13. Detached from surroundings .450 .195 2.32 .021
Item 8. Body feels light .417 .182 2.29 .022
Constant -1.378 .282 -4.88 .000
2(27)=107.932, p < .0001, log of likelihood = -113.47379.1% of the cases were classified correctly
Logistic Regression: CDS Items as Predictors of OBE Group Membership
Study 2: WebN = 521
Standard TVariable Coefficient Error Ratio p
Item 8. Body feels light .301 .085 3.54 .000
Item 2. What is seen, flat, lifeless -.190 .057 -3.38 .001
Item 15. Autoscopy .378 .124 3.05 .002
Item 3. Parts of body don’t don’t seem to belong to me .342 .164 2.09 .037
Item 27. Have to touch myself to make sure my body is real -.403 .193 -2.09 .037
Constant -.261 .200 -1.30 .293
2(27)=132.751, p < .0001, log of likelihood = -260.009123, 87.3% of the cases correctly classified
Logistic Regression: Experiences, CDS w/o OBE, Psi Index w/o OBE as Predictors
of OBE Group MembershipStudy 1: Postal
N = 244
Standard T
Variable Coefficient Error Ratio p
CDS Score w/o OBE .047 .011 4.45 .000
Constant 51.982 2152.483 .02 .981
2(13)=63.39, p < .0001, log of likelihood = -129.469411, 73.4% of the cases correctly classified
Standard TVariable Coefficient Error Ratio pESP Dream .619 .141 4.38 .000Aura .406 .142 2.87 .004Synesthesias
Numbers .560 .208 2.69 .007Disturbing dreams -.423 .171 -2.48 .013CDS Score w/o OBE item .009 .005 2.09 .037Constant 35.11 1364.09 .03 .98
2(13)=197.174, p < .0001, log of likelihood = -221.00384, 76.4% of the cases correctly classified
Logistic Regression: Experiences, CDS w/o OBE, Psi Index w/o OBE as Predictors of OBE Group Membership
Study 2: WebN = 501
CDS Scores for Yes/No Responses on Dream, Psi and Synesthesia Experiences
Study 1: Postal Study 2: WebCDS Mean CDS Mean
ExperienceYes No z Yes No zWaking ESP 26.81 13.96 5.42*** 44.15 25.12 4.97***Dream ESP 27.52 13.46 5.47*** 43.18 30.33 3.61***Apparitions 29.61 15.17 4.98*** 45.48 22.39 6.68***Aura 30.19 18.87 2.37* 50.00 30.12 6.32***Sense of Oneness 23.64 15.64 3.61*** 42.32 25.96 3.46***Déjà Vu 22.05 11.66 3.98*** 41.82 23.96 4.03**Synesthesia Color with Sounds 37.74 15.22 7.05*** 53.32 30.71 6.73***Synesthesia Color with Numbers 38.03 17.19 5.25*** 57.38 32.86 7.33***
* p = .018, ** p = .001, *** = < .0001
LSHS Scores for Yes/No Responses on Dream, Psi and Synesthesia Experiences
Study 1: Postal Study 2: WebLSHS Mean LSHS Mean
Experience Yes No z Yes No zWaking ESP 18.04 15.44 .623 36.85 24.82 2.67**Dream ESP 20.35 12.59 1.90 36.29 23.88 2.67**Apparitions 24.00 13.73 2.34* 37.62 24.87 3.08**Aura 24.86 15.14 1.99* 40.26 28.25 3.77***Sense of Oneness 17.39 15.20 1.22 35.44 30.80 .66Déjà Vu 18.00 9.57 1.83 36.04 18.50 2.24*Synesthesia Color with Sounds 23.17 14.09 2.17* 39.95 30.26 3.21***Synesthesia Color with Numbers 24.80 14.15 2.63** 39.94 31.59 2.68**
*p <.05, ** p < .01, *** p < .0001
And now for something completely different …