Report on Financial Stability May 2013 21 May 2013
Mar 29, 2015
Report on Financial Stability
May 2013
21 May 2013
2
Financial stability heat map
Source: MNB.
Procyclicality Shock-absorbing capacity
November 2012
November 2012
May 2013May 2013
• Credit conditions: The banking system is still barely supporting the economy.
Owing to the low willingness to lend, the banking system is strongly pro-cyclical in corporate lending, which impedes access to credit particularly for SMEs reliant on bank funding.
• Resilience to shocks: The increase in capital need under stress is manageable due to the proven commitment of parent banks.
LIQUIDITY: Liquidity risks remain low, based on stress test results as well. At the same time, most of the liquidity reserves denominated in HUF; therefore, in a protracted stress situation the smooth functioning of the FX swap market is indispensable.
CAPITAL: Capital position has improved on aggregate level. However, given the worse initial capital position at some banks, the solvency stress test indicates higher capital need. Taking into account the parent bank commitment this amount can be considered manageable.
Overall assessment I. – Banking sector remains strongly pro-cyclical
3
4
Overall assessment II. – Key risk and mitigation measures
Key risks: Risk mitigation measures:
1. Protracted euro-area sovereign debt crisis
1. Maintaining prudent fiscal policy and supporting sustainable economic growth in Hungary remain a priority to mitigate the impact of potential adverse shocks from the euro area.
2. Vulnerabilities of the domestic economy
2.1.Credit supply constraints on companies, particularly on SMEs
2.1. The first pillar of the Funding for Growth Scheme (FGS) may improve access to credit with favourable interest conditions for SMEs.
2.2.Exchange rate exposure of companies without natural hedging
2.2. The second pillar of the Funding for Growth Scheme is aimed at converting foreign currency loans of SMEs into forint loans.
2.3.Reliance on external funding, of which a high share is short-term financing
2.3. The third pillar of the Funding for Growth Scheme will reduce the country’s external debt and extend its maturity.
3. Deterioration in portfolio quality
3.1.High share of non-performing loans in the domestic banking sector
3.1. The planned introduction of the personal bankruptcy process could help the management of non-performing loans, while at the same time allowing over-indebted customers to start with a ‘clean sheet’.
3.2.Risk of surge in new defaults 3.2.1. Increasing participation in the exchange rate cap scheme could slow the deterioration in household portfolio quality.
3.2.2. The first and second pillars of the FGS may contribute to an improvement in SME loan portfolio quality.
4. Lack of competition among banks in mortgage lending
4.1. Expedient to cut the regulatory maximum of the early repayment fee to 1–1.5 per cent in the case of refinancing from another bank.
4.2. In agreement with the proposal of the Hungarian Competition Authority, the possibility of bank switching in the case of government subsidies should be examined.
4.3. It may be justified to reduce the maximum amount of notary fees, which are charged not by competing and not even by public bodies, as such fees represent a significant disincentive in the case of refinancing.
4.4. Most mortgage loans are tied to other products (predominantly current accounts); therefore, the switching of current accounts should be facilitated.
4.5. The entry of participants should be promoted which would help households to seek the most favourable offers.
Credit conditions
5
6
The banking sector does not support the real economy
Source: MNB.
Note: The annual growth in the FCI shows the contribution of the financial intermediary system (banking sector) to the annual growth rate of real GDP.
Financial Conditions Index (FCI) and real GDP growth
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2006
I. II. III.
IV.
2007
I. II. III.
IV.
2008
I. II. III.
IV.
2009
I. II. III.
IV.
2010
I. II. III.
IV.
2011
I. II. III.
IV.
2012
I. II. III.
IV.
per centper cent
FCI - banking system FCI - aggregate Real GDP
7
Domestic corporate lending has been steadily contracting since the onset of the crisis
Source: MNB.
Net quarterly change in domestic loans to corporate sector
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
50020
05 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
420
06 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
420
07 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
420
08 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
420
09 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
420
10 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
420
11 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
420
12 Q
1Q
2Q
3Q
4
per centHUF Bn
Long-term bank loans Short-term bank loansLong-term nonbank loans Short-term nonbank loansAnnual growth rate (right-hand scale)
8
Both demand and supply factors contributed to the contraction in corporate lending
Source: MNB.
Decomposition of the cumulative decline in corporate lending into supply and demand effects (relative to 2008 Q3)
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
520
08 Q
4
2009
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2010
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2011
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
percentage point
percentage point
Demand effect Supply effect
9
The monetary easing cycle has a positive impact on price conditions in corporate lending…
Source: MNB.
Interest rate of corporate loans and the MNB policy rate
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Jan-
08M
arM
ay Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan-
09M
arM
ay Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan-
10M
arM
ay Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan-
11M
arM
ay Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan-
12M
arM
ay Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan-
13
per centper cent
HUF - new lending HUF - outstanding MNB policy rate(monthly average)
EUR - new lending EUR - outstanding
10
…hence corporate credit forecast was modified upwards
Source: MNB estimation.
Credit forecast to NFCs along different scenarios
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
2010
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2011
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2013
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
per centper cent
ActualBaseline scenario (with FGS)Inflation Report - March 2013Baseline scenario excluding rate cuts (with FGS)
11
As opposed to corporate lending, demand factors remain the key driver in household
lending
Source: MNB.
Net quarterly change in domestic loans to household sector
-72-64-56-48-40-32-24-16-80816243240
-900-800-700-600-500-400-300-200-100
0100200300400500
2005
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2006
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2007
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2008
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2009
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2010
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2011
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
per centHUF Bn
Bank loans - HUF Bank loans - FXNonbank loans - HUF Nonbank loans - FXAnnual growth rate (right-hand scale)
12
The trend of plummeting new lending continued last year
Source: MNB.
New loan volumes of credit institutions to household sector
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
2005
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2006
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2007
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2008
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2009
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2010
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2011
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
HUF BnHUF Bn
Mortgage loans Other loans Refinancing for early repayments
Resilience to shocks
13
14
In the low level of the System-Wide Financial Stress Index (SWFSI), benign market
conditions are reflected
Source: MNB.
Note: Higher level denotes higher stress.
System-Wide Financial Stress Index (SWFSI)
-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0
-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0
Jan-
07M
ar-0
7Ju
n-07
Sep-
07Nov
-07
Feb-
08M
ay-0
8Ju
l-08
Oct
-08
Jan-
09Ap
r-09
Jun-
09Se
p-09
Dec
-09
Feb-
10M
ay-1
0Au
g-10
Oct
-10
Jan-
11Ap
r-11
Jun-
11Se
p-11
Dec
-11
Mar
-12
May
-12
Aug-
12Nov
-12
Jan-
13Ap
r-13
SWFSI Correlation contribution
15
The stress scenario of liquidity stress test
Source: MNB.
Note: The liquidity stress test is 30-day forward looking.
Assets Liabilities
ItemDegree (per
cent)
Currencies
affectedItem
Degree (per
cent)
Currencies
affected
Default on interbank
assets20 HUF
Withdrawals in
household deposits10 HUF/ FX
Exchange rate shock on
swaps15 FX
Withdrawals in
corporate deposits15 HUF/ FX
Depreciation of assets
eligible at the central
bank
10 HUF
16
The Liquidity Stress Index (LSI) indicates low level of liquidity risk
Source: MNB.
Note: The ratio is the liquidity need to 10 percent of balance sheet total weighted by balance sheet total. Higher ratio denotes higher liquidity risk along the stress scenario.
Liquidity Stess Index, liquidity surplus and need of banks relative to the regulatory minimum
-125
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
-2,500
-2,000
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
Jan-
09 Mar
May Ju
lSe
pNov
Jan-
10 Mar
May Ju
lSe
pNov
Jan-
11 Mar
May Ju
lSe
pNov
Jan-
12 Mar
May Ju
lSe
pNov
per centHUF Bn
Liquidity need to meet the regulatory requirementLiquidity buffer above the regulatory requirementLiquidity Stress Index (right-hand scale)
17
The scenarios of the solvency stress test
• Over the 8 quarter forecast horizon beginning end-2012, the shock hits in 2013 Q2.
• Our baseline scenario is the forecast of the Report on Inflation 2013 Q1.
• Our stress scenario relative to our baseline scenario:
4.3 percentage points lower GDP growth;
15 per cent deprecation of HUF;
300 basis points risk premium shock;
10 per cent drop in house prices.
• Along the stress scenario we accounted for additional loan loss provisioning on outstanding non-performing loans as in a markedly deteriorating economic environment their recovery rate falls.
• As regards the exchange rate cap scheme, we assumed 50 per cent participation ratio both along the baseline and the stress scenario.
• The postponement of halving the bank levy and the pass-through of the entire financial transaction tax are taken into account.
18
The impact of key risks on the banking sector profitability in the stress test on 2-year
forecast horizon
Source: MNB.
Baseline scenario Stress scenario
Loan losses on corporate and household
portfolio498 875
Loan losses on new non-performing corporate
loans264 382
Loan losses on new non-performing household
loans234 368
Additional loan losses on the already non-
performing loans125
Loan losses on local government portfolio 10 23
Exchange rate risk of open position -63
Interest rate risk 60
Bank levy 234 234
Interest cost of the exchange rate cap scheme 28 45
Main components of losses of banking
system in eight quarter horizon (HUF
Bn)
19
In the baseline scenario no additional capital is needed, however along the stress scenario
several banks need capital injection
Source: MNB.
Baseline scenario Stress scenario
End of
first year
End of
second year
End of
first year
End of
second year
Capital need of banks (HUF Bn) 0 0 6 62
Capital buffer of banks above
8 percent CAR (HUF Bn)1,331 1,518 969 889
Total capital buffer (HUF Bn) 1,331 1,518 963 827
20
The Solvency Stress Index (SSI) shows an increasing, but still manageable capital need
Source: MNB.
Note: The indicator is the sum of normalised capital shortages relative to the 8 per cent level, weighted by the capital requirement. The higher the value of the index, the higher the solvency risk in the stress scenario.
Stress test index, capital buffer and need in stress scenario at the end of 8 quarter horizon
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-300
0
300
600
900
1,200
2005
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2006
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2007
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2008
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2009
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2010
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2011
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
per centHUF Bn
Capital buffer above the regulatory requirementCapital need to meet regulatory requirementSolvency Stress Index (right-hand scale)
Key risks and mitigation measures
21
1. Protracted euro-area sovereign debt crisis.
2. Despite the recovery from the technical recession the vulnerabilities of the domestic economy are still present.
• Credit supply constraints on companies, particularly on SMEs
• Exchange rate exposure of companies without natural hedging
• Reliance on external funding, of which a high share is short-term financing
3. The banking sector is heavily burdened by the high share of non-performing, which will rise further based on our forecasts.
4. Lack of competition among banks is causing welfare losses and real economic costs.
22
Key risks
• Protracted euro-area sovereign debt crisis. Several „peripheral countries” are compelled to implement stricter fiscal
consolidation. In some of the core countries, meaningful austerity measures will be
implemented as well. Significant deterioration in the economic outlook of the euro area, while
investor sentiment might remain volatile.
• Owing to high funding costs and deteriorating portfolio quality the profitability outlook of European banks is weak.
• Worsening economic outlook weighs on banks’ balance-sheet.• In several peripheral countries banking systems need substantial capital
injections.
Risks in the external environment
23
24
Credit supply constraints hit the SME sector more severely
Change in new lending to corporations and its decomposition by corporate size
Source: CCIS, MNB estimation.
2007 2011 TotalDemand effect
Supply effect
Micro 1,730 828 - 52.2 - 61.7 9.5 Small 1,120 999 - 10.8 28.5 - 39.3
Medium 1,160 785 - 32.4 - 4.7 - 27.7 Large 1,460 1,250 - 14.4 - 49.3 34.9 Total corporate sector
5,740 3,862 - 29.5 - 14.3 - 15.2
Volume of new lendings (HUF Bn)
Change from 2007 to 2011 (per cent)
25
Exchange rate exposure of SMEs without natural hedge poses a significant risk
Source: CCIS, MNB estimation.
Distribution of exchange rate depreciation of individual contracts (by end-2012)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
-8 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72
per centper cent
Frequency of exchange rate depreciation
Exchange rate movement (%)
26
The first two pillars of the MNB Funding for Growth Scheme (FGS) are aimed at reversing contraction in lending and reducing exchange
rate exposure of SMEs
Source: MNB.
Growth rate of domestic loans to corporate sector
Corporate sector total SME segment
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2010
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2011
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2013
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2014
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2015
Q1
per centper cent
Actual Baseline scenario
March 2013 Optimistic scenario
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2010
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2011
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2013
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2014
Q1 Q2
Q3
Q4
2015
Q1
per centper cent
Actual Baseline scenario
March 2013 Optimistic scenario
27
The third pillar of the FGS accelerates the decrease in short-term external funds without
any deleveragingForeign funds of the banking system and the loan-to-deposit ratio
Source: MNB.
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40Ju
n-10
Aug
Oct
Dec
Feb-
11 Apr
Jun
Aug
Oct
Dec
Feb-
12 Apr
Jun
Aug
Oct
Dec
Feb-
13 Apr
Jun
Aug
Oct
Dec
Feb-
14 Apr
Jun
Aug
Oct
Dec
per centEUR Bn
Foreign fundsBaseline scenarioGross loan-to-deposit ratio (right-hand scale)Net loan-to-deposit ratio (right-hand scale)
28
The third pillar of the FGS is aimed at rationalising the debt structure and reducing
the costs of MNB• The reduction of short term external funds translates into lower level of
foreign exchange reserves and MNB bills outstanding
• Without higher vulnerability
• The effects of MNB swaps on the banking system balance sheet:
• Changes in the consolidated balance sheet of the general government, in case the reduction of short term external funds is achieved with the cooperation of the Debt Management Agency
Change in the banking system's stylized balance sheetLiquid HUF assets EquityExternal assets External debtLoans Deposits
Change in the consolidated stylized balance sheet of the general government
MNB FX reserves MNB securitiesOther assets Other central bank liabilities
FX securitiesHUF securities
29
Banks remain reliant on external funding even in the case of loan-to-deposit ratio decreasing
under 100 per cent
Source: MNB.
Schematic balance sheet of the banking sector at a 100 per cent loan-to-deposit ratio
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Assets Liabilities
EUR BnEUR Bn
Loans to private sector
Deposits and securities of the private
sector
External liabilities
External assets
MNB-bill
Government bonds
Equity
30
Managing deteriorating portfolio quaility remains a key challenge
Ratio of non-performing loans and cost of provisioning
Source: MNB.
Corporate sector Household sector
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
per centper cent
Loan loss provisioningLoan loss provisioning - forecastNon-performing loan ratio (right-hand scale)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
per centper cent
Loan loss provisioningLoan losses related to the early repayment schemeLoan loss provisioning - forecastNon-performing loan ratio (right-hand scale)
31
In the corporate segment the I. and II. pillars of the FGS, while in the household portfolio the planned introduction of personal bankruptcy
may improve portfolio quality
Source: MNB.
The planned personal bankruptcy procedure
Eligible
Permanent repayment
procedure
Fulfilment of the
agreement
The debtor fails to meet the
repayments
The debtor meets
the repayments
The
procedure
ceases
The debtor gets a "clean record"
Monitoring the eligibility
criteriaThe procedure
ceasesNot eligible
Strive to come to an
agreement with the creditors
No agreement, or the debtor
fails to meet the agreement Agreement
32
Increasing participation in the exchange rate cap scheme would have a benign effect on
household portfolio quaility
Source: MNB.
Participation in the exchange rate cap
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
150
300
450
600
750
900
1,050
1,200
1,350
Jan-
12 Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan-
13 Feb
per centHUF Bn
Outstanding amount
Percentage of eligible FX-denominated mortgage loans (right-hand scale)
33
Banks are striving for offsetting high costs through raising net interest income
Net interest income to interest bearing assets
Net interest income to total assets (June 2012 – consolidated data)
Source: ECB CBD, MNB.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Ger
man
y
Belg
ium
Ital
y
Aust
ria
Lith
uani
a
Latv
ia
Slov
enia
Pola
nd
Czec
h Re
publ
ic
Esto
nia
Slov
akia
Bulg
aria
Rom
ania
Hun
gary
per centper cent
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Jan
-09
Mar
May Ju
lSe
pNo
vJa
n-1
0M
arM
ay Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
-11
Mar
May Ju
lSe
pNo
vJa
n-1
2M
arM
ay Jul
Sep
Nov
per centBn HUF
12-month rolling net interest income
Net interest income as a propotion of the gross interest-bearing assets (right-hand scale)Net interest income as a propotion of the net interest-bearing assets (right-hand scale)
34
Market failures in pricing should be managed by enhancing competition
• Expedient to cut the regulatory maximum of the early repayment fee to 1–1.5 per cent in the case of refinancing from another bank.
• In agreement with the proposal of the Hungarian Competition Authority, the possibility of bank switching in the case of government subsidies should be examined.
• It may be justified to reduce the maximum amount of notary fees, which are charged not by competing and not even by public bodies, as such fees represent a significant disincentive in the case of refinancing.
• Most mortgage loans are tied to other products (predominantly current accounts); therefore, the switching of current accounts should be facilitated.
• The entry of participants should be promoted which would help households to seek the most favourable offers.
Thank you for the attention!
35