(' SDMS Document 105769 a FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY REPORT TEST PIT PROGRAM CORTESE LANDFILL SULLIVAN COUNTY, NEW YORK RI/FS COMPLIANCE OVERSIGHT Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract No.: 68-W9-0003 Work Assignment No.: C02067 . TES-6 X K ALLIANCE M^^^L TechnologiesCorporation 302383
141
Embed
Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
( ' SDMS Document
105769
a
FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY REPORT
TEST PIT PROGRAM
CORTESE LANDFILL
SULLIVAN COUNTY, NEW YORK
RI/FS COMPLIANCE OVERSIGHT
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Contract No.: 68-W9-0003
Work Assignment No.: C02067 .
TES-6
XK ALLIANCE M ^ ^ ^ L TechnologiesCorporation
302383
FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY REPORT TEST PIT PROGRAM CORTESE LANDFILL
SULLIVAN COUNTY, NEW YORK RI/FS COMPLL^NCE OVERSIGHT
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Emergency and Remedial Response Division
26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278
Work Assignment No.:
EPA Region:
EPA Site/Facility LD. No.:
Contract No.:
Alliance Document No.:
Alliance Project No.:
Alliance Project Manager:
Telephone No.:
Subcontract No.:
Subcontractor Project Manager:
Telephone No.:
EPA Work Assignment Manager:
EPA Telephone No.:
Date Prepared:
C02067
n NYD980528475
68-W9-0003 (TES 6)
A92-470
l-635-200-0-2PX9-()
Jeffrey Healey
(508) 970-5600
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mark Granger
(212) 264-9588
April 23, 1992
ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 291 Broadway, Suite 1206
New York, New York 10007 (212) 349-4616
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL />4 ALLIANCE
^ 4 J P J | j | ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion
3023S4
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
A92-470.txt
RECYCLED PAPER
11
ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / K ALLIANCE J f J M K | f l ^ Tecnnoiogies CorDoraiion
I 302385
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Site History 1 1.2 Oversight Project Objectives 1 1.3 Organization 2 1.4 Project Schedule 3
2.0 FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY 3 2.1 Test Pit Excavation Methodology 4 2.2 Soil Sampling 7 2.3 Drum Sampling 8 2.4 QA/QC Sampling 9 2.5 Health and Safety 9
3.0 SUMMARY OF DEVIATIONS 10 3.1 General Overview 10 3.2 Deviations from Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan 11 3.3 Modification to Alliance's Field Oversight Work Plan 11
4.0 COMPARISON OF EPA/ALLIANCE AND GOLDER SPLIT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA 12 4.1 Introduction 12 4.2 Quality Control Review of EPA/Alliance Data 12 4.3 Split Sample Comparison 17
5.0 CONCLUSIONS 19 5.1 Effectiveness of Test Pit Program 19 5.2 Nature and Extent of Contamination 19 5.3 Split Sample Data Comparison 20
A Photographs A-1 B Validated Analytical Data, Alliance Technologies, Inc B-1 C Field Logbook Pages C-1 D Personnel on Site D-1 E Test Pit Logs E-1 F Golder's Data Tables F-1
TABLES
Number Page
2-1 SoU Sample Locations 8 2-2 Drum Sampling Locations 9 3-1 Air Sampling Locations 10 4-1 Comparison of Golder and Alliance/EPA Split Samples Organics in Soil
(|Lig/Kg) . . . . . . . . . ; 13 4-2 Comparison of Golder and Alliance/EPA Split Samples Inorganics in Soil
(mg/Kg) 15
HGURES
Number Page
2-1 Sampling Location Map 5
A92-470.txt iv
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL #4 . . . . « . . « _ M k ALLIANCE
^ k W i ^ i L Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion
302387
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authorized Alliance Technologies Corporation (Alliance), under EPA Contract No. 68-W9-0003, Work Assignment No. C02067, to provide RI/FS Compliance Oversight for the Cortese Landfill Site located in Sullivan County, New York. In accordance with the scope of this Work Assignment, EPA requested that Alliance provide oversight of the Test Pit Program conducted February 28, 1991 through March 8, 1991, at the Cortese Landfill by Golder Associates, Inc. (Golder) of Atlanta, Georgia.
1.1 Site History
The Cortese Landfill Site (the Site) is located in Sullivan county within the hamlet of Narrowsburg, New York. The property and landfill area encompass approximately 3.75 acres owned by Mr. John Cortese and a 1.53-acre parcel located along the northern margin of the Cortese property that was purchased by the Town of Tusten in 1973. The Site lies approximately 70 feet south of the Narrowsburg wastewater treatment plant and is bordered to the northeast by a very steep bedrock escarpment and to the southwest by the Conrail railroad track embankment. The Delaware River is approximately 400 feet southwest of the Site.
According to Mr. John Cortese, the Site was in operation from approximately July 1970 to July 1, 1981. The EPA Hazardous Ranking System reports that the landfill received municipal waste from Tusten and neighboring villages and townships at an estimated rate of 3,000 ydVyear. Disposal practices are poorly documented but are alleged to have ranged from burial in trenches to disposal over the landfill surface. According to deposition testimony, industrial wastes were accepted and disposed of at the landfill during 1973. The EPA Hazardous Waste Ranking System reports that these wastes included solvents, paint thinners, paint sludge and waste oils. Disposal is alleged to have included the placement of drums in trenches.
In September 1990, Golder submitted the "Test Pit/Spill Containment Work Plan" describing the proposed method of investigation for three areas at the Site identified to potentially contain buried drums.
1.2 Oversight Project Objectives
The objectives of this report are to summarize information collected during the field oversight activities, and provide summary data that will assist EPA in reviewing the "Test Pit Report" produced by Golder, including:
• Documentation of field observations; • Deviations from the EPA-approved "Test Pit/Spill Containment Work Plan";
Geological data and interpretation; and Conclusions from field activity.
Alliance also acquired representative split samples and monitored the air quality for Health and Safety purposes. Alliance's responsibilities are detailed in the EPA-approved "Final Oversight Work Plan, Test Pit Program for the Cortese Landfill Site" (Alliance, January 29, 1991).
Due to the low frequency of sampling conducted by Golder, Alliance obtained split samples at a rate of greater than 50 percent. Split samples were analyzed through EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).
1.3 Organization
This report is organized into five sections and six appendixes.
Section 1, "Introduction," contains general information about the scope of the project and the objectives for this oversight report.
Section 2, "Field Oversight Summary," contains a summary of the field activities and observations that took place during oversight.
Section 3, "Summary of Deviations," contains a summary of deviations from the Golder Work Plan and modifications to Alliance's Work Plan to accommodate field conditions.
Section 4, "Comparison of EPA/Alliance and Golder Split Sample Analytical Data," summarizes findings concluded from the comparison of split sample data presented in this report.
Section 5.0, "Conclusions," contains an analysis of the effectiveness of the field program, and an interpretation of site conditions.
Section 6.0, "Recommendations," contains Alliance's recommendations for possible future investigations and/or remedial actions that may be considered by EPA.
Appendix A, "Photographs," presents a photographic log of the program and includes photos of the drums found in the field and test pits.
Appendix D, "Personnel on Site," contains a list of personnel on site each day of activity.
Appendix E, "Test Pit Logs," contains copies of the test pit logs.
Appendix F, "Golder's Data Tables," contains a copy of Golder's data as presented in their report.
1.4 Project Schedule
Three weeks were allotted to complete the test pit program. Work was completed in seven business days. The following table lists the test pit excavations performed by Golder on each working day.
Date
February 28 - March 1, 1991
March 4-5, 1991
March 6, 1991
March 7, 1991
March 8, 1991
Test Pit Excavated
TPl-1
TP2-2
TP3-1
TP3-2
TPl-2
2.0 FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY
As directed by EPA, an Alliance representative was present at the Site to observe test pit excavations and related activities performed by Golder and their subcontractor. Chemical Waste Management (ChemWaste) and to collect representative split samples.
EPA/Alliance took photographs, drew sketches of the excavation areas and described field activities in the logbook. The photographs are located in Appendix A; copies of the logbook pages are located in Appendix C. A table of personnel onsite and activities conducted each day is presented in Appendix D.
The following sections describe the test pit excavation methodology and discuss the field oversight activities and observations.
A92-470.txt
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / K ALLIANCE
M ^ M ^ ^ Tecnnoiogtes Gorooraiiori,
3 0 2 3 9 0
2.1 Test Pit Excavation Methodology
Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan, Section 3.0, stated a minimum of three test pits and a maximum of six test pits were to be excavated in three proposed test pit investigation areas. These investigation areas, as shown in Figure 2-1, correspond to areas previously identified which contain anomalous geophysical zones and/or disposal trenches observed from historical photographs of landfiUing operations. If drums were encountered in the first test pit excavated in each zone, further excavation was considered unnecessary, as stated in Section 3.1 of Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan.
ChemWaste excavated the test pits utilizing a top-down approach with a Midiyutani track machine. Excavations were terminated when drums were encountered or the extent of refuse was found. Excavated material was placed at a temporary spoils stockpile located far enough from the test pit so as to not impede slope stability of the test pit walls. An earthen berm was constructed around the stockpiled area. Test pit side walls were sloped 1.5:1. Native soil was confirmed by carefully scraping the pit bottom with the backhoe bucket.
Test pits were backfilled with the excavated material upon completion of sampling. Clean fill was used to cover trash and other debris that was visible at the surface after the test pit program was completed. The excavator and payloader used to move the excavated material were steam cleaned when the program was completed. Although Alliance was not onsite to observe the decontamination operations, Golder assured Alliance they had complied with Section 3.7, Heavy Equipment Decontamination, of their work plan.
2.7.7 Program Implementation
Alliance observed the excavations of five test pits at the Site from February 28 through March 8, 1991. Golder collected seven soil and two drum samples for laboratory analysis. Alliance split six of these samples for analysis through the CLP (five soil and one drum).
Two test pits (TPl-1 and TPl-2) were excavated in Test Pit Investigation Area 1 (TPl), and no drums were encountered in either test pit. In Test Pit Investigation Area 2 (TP2), crushed drums were encountered in the first test pit excavated (TP2-2), therefore, a second test pit was not excavated in this area. In Test Pit Investigation Area 3 (TP3), two test pits were excavated (TP3-1 and TP3-2) and one drum was found in TP3-2.
The following subsection describes observations noted during oversight activities involving test pit excavations. Refer to the photographs presented in Appendix A, the
field logbook notes in Appendix C, and the test pit logs in Appendix E for further information and documentation regarding the nature of the test pit excavations.
2.7.2 Test Pit Excavation Observations
Test Pit 1-1
Test Pit 1-1 (TPl-l) contained miscellaneous debris such as tires, metals, wood, asphalt, glass and trash. Excavated material was stored on a stockpile located 50 yards southeast of the test pit.
The excavation continued until a side slope of 1:1.5 was created. Three (3) feet of water accumulated in the test pit prohibiting Golder personnel from entering the test pit to perform magnetometry as specified in Golder's "Test Pit Program Work Plan," Section 3.3. The magnetometer was to be used to determine the presence of buried metallic objects within the side walls of the test pit, and/or beneath the test pit. ChemWaste continued the excavation to verify that native soil had been encountered. Native soil was encountered approximately 10 feet below ground surface (bgs). Alliance photographed and sketched the excavation area..
The total depth of excavation was approximately 11 feet and the top dimensions of the test pit were 54 feet x 42 feet. Soil samples were collected from the bottom of the pit
Test Pit 2-2
Miscellaneous debris including white goods, car parts and refuse were found in Test Pit 2-2 (TP2-2). A single crushed drum was discovered soon after the excavation was initiated. Alliance took a photograph of the crushed drum and the trench the drum had been discovered in. Golder obtained an OVA reading of 135 ppm within the crushed drum.
As the excavation continued, additional crushed drums were encountered by Golder. One drum was found leaking a thick black material. Also found was a spent IV medical waste pack. Alliance took additional photographs of the drums and materials encountered in the test pit. An OVA reading of 1,100 ppm was obtained by Golder in one of the drums.
The test pit was terminated at approximately 14 feet bgs. During the excavation, PID readings were recorded as high as 565 ppm by Golder. Golder measured the oxygen content to be 20.4% on the perimeter of the pit with an LEL meter. Water accumulated at the bottom of the pit from seepage occurring at 6 feet below ground. Native soil was encountered at approximately 10 feet bgs. Golder had an OVA reading of 163 ppm of the native soil.
A92-470.txt 6
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 « B B I ^ I B . « 1 ! -
#4% ALLIANCE M W 0 ^ ^ Jecnnoiog.esCo(poraiion__
' 302393
The backhoe excavated a bucket full of native soil and deposited it on some polyethylene laid out next to the pit in order to collect samples. Alliance recorded 30 ppm on the HNu on this soil.
Soil samples were collected from the bottom of the test pit and the spoils pile. ChemWaste also collected a drum sample which contained all soil.
Test Pit 3-1
Refuse including glass botties, tin cans, plastics, wood, cloth, tires and metal debris was observed between 1 foot and 9 feet bgs in TP3-1. The test pit was terminated at 13 feet bgs. The final dimensions of the test pit were 50' x 42'.
Test Pit 3-2
Test Pit 3-2 (TP3-2) was excavated near the pond, in swampy ground. The test pit filled up with water during the excavation. Refuse was found approximately 6" bgs. At 2 feet bgs, a crushed drum was encountered and removed from the pit Solid resinlike, reddish material remained in the drum. Golder broke the material into pieces with a hammer. Golder and Alliance took pieces of the material for laboratory sampling. The drum was placed back into the test pit at 6.5 feet bgs.
Golder constructed an earthen berm between the pond and the test pit to prevent debris from entering the pond. The test pit was terminated at 13 feet below ground. Soil . samples were collected of the native soil.
Test Pit 1-2
Refuse including glass bottles, wood, tires, and metal debris was encountered at 1 to 5 feet bgs in TPl-2. However, this test pit contained less refuse than that observed in other pits. Soil samples were collected from the bottom of the test pit and from the spoils stockpile. Final dimensions of the test pit were 45.2 x 39 feet.
2.2 Soil Sampling
Golder collected a total of seven soil samples during the test pit program. Five samples were collected from the backhoe bucket of native soil fi"om the bottom of the pit, and two samples were obtained from the spoils stockpile. Samples were analyzed for volatile and semi-volatile organics, pesticides/PCBs, and metals and cyanide.
As directed by EPA, Alliance obtained split samples of five of the seven Golder samples. From TPl-1, Alliance obtained a split sample at 11 feet (TPl 1-Sl). From TP2-2, Alliance obtained two split samples, including TP22-S1 obtained from the bottom of the test pit at 12 feet, and TP22-S2 collected from the spoils pile. From
A92-470.txt 7
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL m . „ „ A » „ „ „ „ =
M ^ ' ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporauon
302394
TP3-1, Alliance obtained a split sample for the bottom of the test pit at 13 feet (TP31-S1). From TPl-2, Alliance obtained one split sample from the bottom of the test pit at 8 feet.
The Golder field team used one disposable sampling utensil per sampling location and discarded the utensil into the test pit during backfilling. When a split was required, Golder and Alliance sample containers were alternately filled beginning with the volatile organic fraction until aU sample jars were filled. All samples were obtained as grabs.
Table 2-1 summarizes Golder's and Alliance's soil sample locations, identification numbers (ID nos.) and the dates samples were collected.
2.3 Drum Sampling
Golder collected two drum samples during the test pit program. One drum was sampled in TP2-2 and one in TP3-2. Alliance split one drum sample from TP3-2.
The ChemWaste crew entered TP2-2 and found one drum that contained a thick, black, oil-like substance (See photo. Appendix A). It was determined in the field that sufficient volume of this substance was not available to sample. However, ChemWaste collected a sample for Golder from another drum containing soil. All other drums in TP2-2 were crushed, relatively unweathered and appeared to be empty.
TABLE 2-1. SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Test Pit
TPl-1
TPl-1
TP2-2
TP2-2
TP3-1
TP3-2
TPl-2
TPl-2
Sample Location
TPll-Sl (11 ft)
TPl 1-SI (Dup)
TP22-S2 (spoils)
TP22-S1 (12 ft)
TP31-S1 (13 ft)
TP32-S2
TP12-S2 (8 ft)
TP12-S1 (spoils)
Alliance ID (organics/inorganics)
BGH41/MBEZ43
BGH42MBEZ44 (Dup)
BGH43/MBEZ45
BGH44/MBEZ46
BGH45/MBEZ47
N/A
BGH47/MBEZ49
N/A
Golder ID
GB9190
N/A
GB9188
GB9187
GB9191
GB9446
GB9.450
GB9449
Date Collected
3/1/91
3/1/91
3/5/91
3/5/91
3/5/91
3/7/91
3/8/91
3/8/91
A92-470.txt
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XI4 ALLIANCE
M^^i^^^ecr]no\ogiesCoijiO[ahor\
302395
A rusted drum found in TP3-2 did not have a lid and contained a reddish, resin-like material (see photo. Appendix B). The material was solid and had to be broken into pieces with a hammer to collect samples. Therefore, no sample for volatile organic analysis was collected.
Table 2-2 summarizes the drum sample locations and ID nos.:
TABLE 2-2. DRUM SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Test Pit
TP2-2
TP3-2
Sample Location
TP22-S3
TP32-S1
Alliance ID (organics/inorganics)
N/A
BGH46/MBEZ48
Golder ID
GB9189
GB9447
Date Collected
3/6/91
3/7/91
2.4 QA/QC Sampling
Golder was not required by the Test Pit Program Work Plan to collect any QA/C^C samples. Alliance, however, collected a duplicate and MS/MSD sample from TPl-1.
2.5 Health and Safety
ChemWaste conducted daily safety meetings regarding the potential hazards associated with heavy equipment and excavations. Personnel were instructed to make eye contact with the operators before moving near the backhoe or into the pit. Also, ChemWaste personnel were equipped with walkie talkies. The exclusion zone was defined by a snow fence and staked out with caution tape.
Golder personnel and the Alliance representative donned level C protective equipment. The ChemWaste crew donned level B personal protective gear since they were physically excavating and/or entering the test pits.
Air quality was monitored by both Golder and ChemWaste with PID instruments in the breathing zone during excavation activities. In addition, ChemWaste used an LEL/O2 meter.
Golder collected three eight hour continuous air samples each day during excavations except on March 6, 1991 (refer to Section 3.2) as specified in Section 3.8 of Golder's Work Plan. Samples were collected with SUMMA canisters.
A92-470.txt
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XK ALLIANCE
M ^ l ^ 4 ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corcoraiion
302396
According to Section 3.8 of Golder's Work Plan, one sample was to be in an upwind location and two downwind. However, the wind changed directions many times during the day, therefore, Golder generally placed one canister on each side of the landfill except by the steep bedrock escarpment. Golder felt it was not necessary to place one here because the escarpment provided a shield from the wind. Figure 2-1 depicts the relative Summa canister locations by number.
Table 3-1 summarizes the air sampling program.
TABLE 3-1. AIR SAMPLE«^G LOCATIONS
Golder ID
Air #2 Air #3 Air #4 Air #5 Air #6 Air #7 Air #8 Air #9 Air #10 Ai r# l l Air #12 Air #13 Air #14 Air #15 Air #16 Air #17 Air #18 Air #19 Air #20 Air #21 Air #22
Overall, tasks performed by Golder and observed by Alliance at the site were conducted in a professional manner. The Golder field team conducted the test pit
A92-470.txt
RECYCLED PAPER
10
ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XK ALLIANCE
M ^ 4 i r ^ Tecnnoiogies Co^Doraiion_
;' 302397
program with a clear understanding of the tasks to be completed. The Alliance representative communicated daily with Golder field team.
Deviations noted by Alliance during oversight of the test pitting activities are discussed in the following section.
3.2 Deviations from Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan
• Due to the presence of water in most of the test pits, Golder personnel did not utilize a magnetometer to determine the presence of buried metal at the bottom of the test pits as specified in Section 3.3 of Golder's Test Pit Work Plan. It is noted that water was not encountered in TPl-2, and magnetometry could have been performed. However, the magnetometer was not on site during excavation of TPl-2.
® On March 6, 1991, one of the SUMMA canisters did not have a vacuum. As a result, only two air samples were collected as opposed to three specified in the Test Pit Work Plan, Section 1.2. The laboratory sub-contracted by Golder to supply the canisters did not provide Golder with a spare canister.
» Test pits TPl-1 and TP2-2 were left open overnight A temporary fence was constructed around the pits and a tarpaulin was placed over the spoils pile. The area was patrolled by a night watchman. The Golder Work Plan stated in Section 3.3 that test pits would be backfilled at the end of each day.
• The drums found and sampled in TP3-2 and TP2-2 were not labelled with paint as described in Section 3.3 of the Test Pit Work Plan.
3.3 Modification to Alliance's Field Oversight Work Plan
Two modifications to the procedures outiined in the Alliance Work Plan were necessary to accommodate the conditions encountered in the field.
<» The EPA/Alliance split sample obtained from the drum in TP3-2 was not a representative split. The sample was obtained by hammering the material in the drum and breaking pieces of the material off and placing them in sample containers.
® Golder utilized "disposable" sampling tools during sampling activities, therefore, rinses were not collected. Consequentiy, Alliance did not obtain split rinsate samples as described in Section 7.5 of Alliance's Brossman Short Form found in Appendix A of the Oversight Work Plan.
A92-470.txt 11
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XK ALLIANCE
£ ^ ^ $ M ^ S L _TecnnoiogiesCo_rpofaion
3 0 2 3 9 8
4.0 COMPARISON OF EPA/ALLIANCE AND GOLDER SPLIT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA
4.1 Introduction
Alliance was directed by EPA to collect six soil/drum split samples at the Cortese Landfill site. These samples are listed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. The split samples were obtained in accordance with Alliance's EPA-approved "Final Oversight Work Plan, Test Pit Program, Cortese Landfill Site", dated January 29, 1991.
The EPA/Alliance samples were analyzed through the EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) for TCL volatiles, TCL semivolatiles, TCL pesticides/PCBs, TAL metals and total cyanide. It can not be confirmed that Golder's split samples were analyzed by similar methods, since only summary tables and no raw data were received for review by Alliance.
The objective for split sample collection during this effort was to quantitatively compare analytical results obtained by Golder to those from the EPA/Alliance samples.
4.2 Quality Control Review of EPA/Alliance Data
Tables 4-1 and 4-2 provide summary tables comparing positive analytical results from the Golder split samples with the validated results of the EPA/Alliance split samples. Validation of the EPA/Alliance data was performed in accordance with Region II guidance by Weston/ESAT and Alliance's subcontractor, ChemTech and approved by the EPA Region n Monitoring Measurements Branch (MMB).
A review of the EPA/AUiance data validation reports indicates that although most of the data were acceptable, several data points were estimated due to laboratory quality control problems.
The following analytes were detected in both the Golder and EPA/Alliance data:
® Volatiles Organics (VOCs): acetone, chloroform, 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylene.
" Semivolatiles Organics (SVOCs): phenol, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, benzoic acid and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene.
U " Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J =: Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Non-detected value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results exceed acceptance criteria for field duplicates -- RPD > 50% ND = Analyte was not detected and the detection limit is unknown " = Analyte was not reported NA = Not Applicable
A92-456.WK1
Table 4-2. COMPARISON OF GOLDER AND EPA/ALLIANCE SPLIT SAMPLES INORGANICS IN SOIL (mg/Kg)
U l
Analyte
Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
CRDL
40 12 2
40 1
1000 2
10 5
20 0.6
1000 3 8
1000 1000
10 4
iii*iisitiiiiiB ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ EPA/Alliance MBEZ43
10200 4.00 UJ
6.9 53.1 0.51 468 10.1 J 8.8 J
15.0 J 18700
12.3 2680 1180 13.8 J 701
42.8 6.3 U
47.4
Golder GB9190
13200 ~
4.3 71.0 0.51 480 11.0 9.8
12.0 22300
11.0 2740 1650 15.0
1100 ND
15.0 54.0
RPD
26 NA
46 29
0 3 9
11 22 18 11 2
33 8
44 NA NA
13
wmm^^^^^m^m EPA/Alliance MBEZ49
8860 5.50 J 6.1
42.2 0.25 448 8.5 8.5 J
26.1 J 17200
27.3 2920 709 16.0 J 801 31.9 5.4
64.5
Golder GB9450
7900 —
4.5 44.0 0.29 490 7.0 5.8
12.0 13900
11.0 1800 513 11.0 830 ND 8.5
46.0
RPD
11 NA
30 4
15 9
19 • 38 74* 21 85* 47 32 37
4 NA
45 33
mmm^mii^m^m EPA/Alliance MBEZ46
9980 4.3 J 6.3
55.4 0.52 382 9.1 J 9.3 J
11.3 J 17800
12.6 2730
556 16.3 J 904 52.4 6.5
47.5
Golder GB9187
10500 ~
4.4 58.0 0.40 320 8.7 8.0
19.0 18600
11.0 2390
621 15.0 920 ND
11.0 49.0
RPD
5 NA
36 5
26 18 4
15 51
4 14 13 11 8 2
NA 51
3
O i ^ I O I
N> ;
A92-457.WK1
Table 4-2.
ON
w o to
o
COMPARISON OF GOLDER AND EPA/ALLIANCE SPLIT SAMPLES (continued) INORGANICS IN SOIL (mg/Kg)
Analyte
Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc
CRDL
40 12 2
40 1
1000 2
10 5
20 0.6
1000 3 8
1000 1000
10 4
'mmm^^mmmmmmmi EPA/Alliance MBEZ45
7790 3.40 UJ
5.9 27.8 0.21 217 7.5 8.0 J
11.5 J 14900
9.4 2760
752 14.4 J 749 71.8 4.7
37.6
Golder GB9188
8530 —
5.3 27.0 0.33 220 7.9 7.4
12.0 16700
8.2 2540
795 13.0 760 63.0 9.9
38.0
RPD
9 NA
11 3
44 1 5 8 4
11 14 8 6
10 1
13 71
1
m m m ^ ^ m ^ ^ ^ EP/VAIIiance MBEZ47
4860 3.80 UJ 4.5
18.2 0.22 U 361 5.4 5.1 J 8.1 J
10200 14.1
1870 193
10.4 J 526 18.2 2.5 37
Golder GB9191
5890 -
2.4 17.0 0.25 440 5.0 4.8
11.0 10500
6.9 1770 210 9.7
520 ND 6.0 38
RPD
19 NA
61 7
NA 20
8 &
30 3
69* 5 8 7 1
NA 82
3
TP32-S1 (drum) EPA/Alliance MBEZ48
22.8 3.80 UJ 0.45 U
13700 0.22 U 27.6
1.1 9.0 J
0.22 U 46.6
1.9 13.2 1.5 1.7
22.6 U 71.9 0.67 U 6.4
Golder GB9447
700 -
ND 11400
ND 100 ND ND 1.9
1300 0.83 210
34 ND 71
75.0 ND
16.0
RPD
187* NA NA
18 NA
113 NA NA NA
186* 78
176 183*
NA NA
4 NA
86
U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration indicated. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Non-detected value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. NA = Not applicable. ND = Analyte was not detected. - = Analyte was not reported * = Results exceed acceptance criteria for field duplicates ~ one value is > 5 x CRDL and RPD > 50% ** = Results exceed acceptance criteria for field duplicates - both values are < 5 x CRDL and absolute difference > 4 x CRDL.
A92-457.WK1
4.3 Split Sample Comparison
4.3.1 Comparison Acceptance Criteria
Currently, EPA has not published guidance pertaining to the quantitative comparison of split samples which are analyzed by two different laboratories. Consequently, Alliance has developed a comparison procedure that calculates the relative percent difference (RPD) of detected compounds in each data set. An acceptance criteria is then applied to the calculated RPD to evaluate the comparability of the split samples. The acceptance criteria for organics and inorganic results above five times the contract required detection limit (CRDL) is a RPD of 50%. For inorganic results that are below five times the CRDL, the acceptance criteria is an absolute difference of less than four times the CRDL.
Accordingly, Alliance compared the Golder and EPA/Alliance data by leniently applying the above acceptance criteria to RPD calculations. Results below the acceptance criteria were considered adequate comparability.
4.3.2 Comparison Results
A quantitative comparison of the EPA/Alliance and Golder data, utilizing the above comparison procedure, is presented in tables 4.1 and 4.2. A summary of the comparison is given below. Where chemical results were not available from both EPA/Alliance and the Golder, no data comparison is provided.
Sample location TPll -Sl
Volatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.
Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.
Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable.
Sample location TP12.S2
Volatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.
Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.
Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for copper and lead. The Golder results appeared to be slightly biased towards lower concentrations.
Volatile Organics - Five of the seven compared compounds had comparabilities outside the acceptance criteria. Of these compounds, the EPA/Alliance results for trichloroethene and toluene were more than twice the Golder reported results.
Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable for the majority of analytes, however, 1,2-dichlorobenzene had a RPD that was just outside the acceptance criteria. In addition, EPA/Alliance reported below CRQL concentrations for 1,4-dichloro-benzene, 4-methylphenol, di-n-butylphthalate and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate that were either not detected or not reported by Golder.
Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable.
Sample location TP22-S2 (spois)
Volatile Organics - All three compared analytes, acetone, 2-butanone and 4-raethyl-2-pentanone, had RPDs that were significantly outside the acceptance criteria. The Golder VOC results appeared to be biased towards higher concentrations.
Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable for the majority of analytes, however, benzoic acid had a RPD that was significantly outside the acceptance criteria. In addition, EPA/Alliance reported below CRQL concentrations for phenol, 1,4-dichlorobenzene and 1,2-dichlorobenzene that were not detected by Golder.
Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable.
Sample location TP31-S1
Volatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.
Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable, however, EPA reported below CRQL concentrations for 2-chlorophenol, 1,4-dichlorobenzene and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate that were not detected by Golder.
Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for lead.
Sample location TP32-S1 (Drum)
Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for, phenol which had a RPD that was significantly outside the acceptance criteria.
Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for aluminum, iron and manganese. Additionally, the Golder positive results appeared to be biased towards higher concentrations.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based upon observations made by Alliance from February 28, 1991 through March 8, 1991, and from the information and data obtained by Alliance subsequent to the field program, the following conclusions are made with regard to the Test Pit Program.
5.1 Effectiveness of Test Pit Program
The test program was effectively implemented and completed by Golder and ChemWaste. In most cases, Golder and ChemWaste followed the procedures specified in Golder's EPA-approved "Test Pit/Spill Containment Work Plan." A number of deviations were noted, however, it is not likely that these deviations diminish the effectiveness of the program. Although the elimination of the magnetometer survey does lessen the amount of information obtained during the program, the test pit excavations allowed Golder and Alliance to gain an effective understanding of the nature of the waste materials deposited in the three investigation areas.
5.2 Nature and Extent of Contamination
The field observations and results of the field screening and laboratory analysis completed by Golder and Alliance provide useful information and data to evaluate the nature and extent of contamination at the Cortese landfill. Based on this information. Alliance concludes that significant levels of contamination do not appear to exist in the three areas investigated during the test pit program. Note, however, that a risk assessment is required prior to determining the true nature of the hazards posed by the site.
The highest levels of VOCs and SVOCs were noted in Investigation Area 2 (TP2-2) in the vicinity of Zones A and B which were previously noted as having anomalous geophysical results. VOCs detected by Golder at low levels included methylene chloride, acetone, 2-butanone, trichloroethane, chloroform, MIBK, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. A number of these compounds (i.e., 2-butanone) are typical by-products generated during biodegradation of industrial wastes. A number of SVOCs were also detected at slightiy higher levels than the VOCs, however, considering the higher quantitation limits (QLs) established for SVOCs, these levels do not appear significant. With minor exception, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in Investigation Areas 1 and 3.
In most cases, inorganics were detected at similar concentrations in all three investigation areas. Inorganics detected at the highest concentrations were those
typically identified at elevated levels in municipal landfills including iron, magnesium and manganese. Heavy metals (i.e., lead, chromium, arsenic) were not found at significant levels.
One unusual result was noted. The TP32-S1 drum sample from TP-3 showed relatively high levels of phenol (4630 pg/kg detected by Golder) and barium (13,700 and 11,400 pg/kg detected by Golder and Alliance, respectively). These levels may warrant concern.
5.3 Split Sample Data Comparison
Overall, the qualitative comparability for the two data sets was acceptable, although the quantitative comparabilities for the volatile, semivolatile and inorganics data varied. The following samples were noted as having poor quantitative comparability.
• Sample TP22-S1 - Five of the seven compared volatile organic compounds were not comparable and the EPA/Alliance results for trichloroethene and toluene were more than twice the Golder reported results.
• Sample TP22-S2 - The results for the three compared volatile organics; acetone, 2-butanone and 4-methyl-2-pentanone, were signiflcantiy different.
Because the above samples were soil, the poor comparabilities could be attributed to sample heterogeneity. However, Golder should confirm their results for these samples if the concentrations approach action levels.
No pesticide/PCB results were reported by Golder. It is not clear if the samples were analyzed for pesticide/PCBs or if no pesticide/PCB s were detected. However, since EPA/Alliance did not detect any pesticide/PCBs in their split samples, no further action is required.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Removal versus Remedial Response
At the request of EPA, Alliance evaluated whether or not a removal action is warranted at the Cortese Landfill site, or whether it would be more appropriate to address potential site hazards during the remedial action phase of the program. Based on the results of the test pit program. Alliance does not believe a removal action is warranted at this time for the following reasons.
A significant number of drums was encountered in Investigation Area 2 only. The majority of the drums were crushed, empty and contained primarily solid materials. It does not appear that significant releases of liquids and/or chemicals are continuing to
A92-470.txt 20
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 Ar4 ALLIANCE g^r -^^
I 302407
occur under these conditions. Further, given the fact that significant levels of contamination were not identified in most samples collected, an imminent human health and/or ecological hazard does not appear to be posed by the materials encountered in the test pits.
There are, however, concerns worth noting. The fairly significant infiltration of water into the excavation areas, whether indicative of "perched" or "shallow" water table conditions, suggests ongoing interaction of landfill wastes with ground water is occurring, and continuing low level releases of contaminants to ground water is likely. Given this scenario, and the fact that the test pit program did not collect and analyze a large number of samples, the extent of the continued leaching of contaminants to ground water and the adjacent waterways is unknown. Therefore, continued investigation of leachate generation and hydrogeologic conditions under the Phase HI remedial investigation is warranted. Further, the "development of alternatives" process should proceed to investigate engineering methods for minimizing leachate generation and the resultant impacts on ground water.
In the event that further sampling of leachate and/or landfiU waste materials reveals significant levels of contamination, alternatives which include excavation and treatment/disposal of "hot spots" encountered within the landfill should be formulated in the feasibility study.
6.2 Recommended Investigations
Further investigative work under the RI/FS program is recommended to evaluate the potential threat that the landfills, drums, and waste material pose to the environment and to human health. Much of the landfill waste is located within the ground water table and the close proximity to adjacent water bodies poses some concern.
Additional sampling of the ground water, surface water, sediments and soil should be conducted to evaluate the extent of contamination associated with the site. The geology and hydrogeology of the site also requires further investigation to ensure that migration pathways can be determined with accuracy.
A baseline risk assessment is recommended to provide an evaluation of the potential threat to human health and the environment in the absence of remedial action. Possible human and environmental receptors should be defined and evaluated in the assessment The FS should then be developed to address all contaminants and migration pathways that pose risk to all environmental and/or human receptors.
-Chloromethane -Bromomethane -Vinyl Chloride, -Chi oroethane • -Methylene Chloride. -Acetone Carbon Disulfide -1,1-Dichloroethene -1, 1 -D i c h 1 or oet h an e -1, 2-Dichlciroethene (total). -Ch 1 or o for m ' -1.2-Dichl oroethane, -2-Butanone -1. 1, 1-Tr ichloroethane. -Carbon Tetrachlor ide_ -Vinyl Acetate -Br omod i c h1 or omet h ane. •1,2-Dichloropropane -c is-1, 3-Dichl oropropene_ -Tr ichloroethene Dibromochloromethane •1,1, 2-Tr ichl oroethane. -Benzene T r a n s - 1 . 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o o e n e B r o m o f o r m 4 - M e t h y l - 2 - P e n t a n o n e 2 - H e x a n o n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 . 1 . 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z s n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e Total Xylenes.
FORM I VOA
12 12 12 12
, - ;3 -14
6 6 . 6
• 6 6 6
. 12 6 6
12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
12 12
6 . . 6
6 6 2 5 4
r. \ I4t j
r ' ' -
1 1
!U !U !U !U I ' J & J J T
!B - j r ' !U !U :u !U !U !U lU !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U tu !U !U !U !U !U !U !U ! U ! J !U ! J t
1 / 8 7 Rev " \
i 3 0 2 4 2 6
IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ,
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5.0 Cg/mL) G.
Level: Qow/med) LOUJ
"A Moisture: not dec. 17
Column (pack/cap) PACK
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BGH<i 1 Contract: 68D900.56
SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID: 910120-01
Lab File ID: E3240
Date Received: 03/02/91
Date Analyzed: 03/06/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: <uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG
CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. G!
r . i l 4 7
FORM I VOA-T IC 1/87 Rev.
302427
lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO,
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No. : 15939
Matrix: Csoi1/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (q/mL) G.
Level: (low/med) LOU
y. Moisture: not dec.
BGH42 Contract: 68D90056
SAS No.: . SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID: 910120-02
Lab File ID: E3241
17
Column: Cpack/cap) PACK
Date Received: 03/02/91
Date Analyzed: 03/06/91
Dilution Factor: 1. 0
CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q
74-87-3 Ch 1 or omet hane 74-83-9—• Bromomethane 75-01-4 Vinvl Chloride 75-00-3 Chi oroethane T ^ riCl O — Mi-1-fTk...lmnn r^U '\ ^ ^ ^ r \ r - \
/--i '•.'•s z — nethvlene Chloride 67-64-1 • Acetone 75-15-0 Carbon Disul fide 75-35-4 1, 1 -D i c h 1 or oet hen e 75-34-3 1, 1-D ichl oroethane 540-59-0 1.2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3 Ch 1 or o f or m 107-06-2 1.2-D ichl or oet hane 78-93-3 2-Butanone 71-55-6 1. 1. 1-Tr ichl oroethane 56-23-5 Car bon Tet r ac h 1 or i de 108-05-4 Vinvl Acetate 75-27-4 Br omod i c h 1 or omet hane 78-87-5 1.2-DichloroDroRane 10061-01-5 c is-1,3-Dich1 or opr opene 79-01 -6 Tr i c h 1 or oet hene 124-48-1 D i br omoch 1 or omet hane 79-00-5 ~ 1 . 1, 2-Tr ichl oroethane 71-43-2 Benzene 10061-02-6 Trans-1, 3-Dichloroprc.pene ! 75-25-2 Bromoform 108-10-1 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone ! 591-78-6 2-Hexanone 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene ! 79-34-5 1. 1.2. 2-Tetrachloroethane 108-88-3 Toluene ! 108-90-7 Chi or obenz ene ! 100-41-4 Ethvl benzene 100-42-5 Stvrene ! 1330-20-7 Total Xvlenes !
! 12 ! 12 ! 12 1 12 ! - 4 I 22 ! 6 ! 6 ! 6
6 ! 6 ! 6 I 12
6 ! 6
12 I ' 6
6 ! 6
6 6 6 6 6
. 6 12 12 6 6 6 6 ••
6 : 6 6
1 t
lU !U !U !U IBJ'LiO' IB 'U^T !U !U !U !U !U !U lU !U !U !U !U !U !U lU !U lU ! !U !U I !U I .'U ! !U ! !U ! !U ! ! U • i !U ! !U ! !U ! !U I f • f 1 1
FORM I VOA f, I 155/87 RE
302428
IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NC
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (q/mL) G.
Level: (low/med) LOU
y. Moisture: not dec. 17
Column (pack/cap) PACK
Contract: 63D90056
SAS No.:
BGH42
SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID: 910120-02
Lab File ID: E32.il
Date Received: 03/02/91
Date Analyzed: 03/06/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Number TICs found: 0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: ^ (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG •'
-Chi o r omet h an e _ -Bromomethane -Viny l C h l o r i d e . -Chi o r o e t h a n e - M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e . -Acetone -Carbon Disulfide •1, 1-Dichloroethene. •1, 1-Dichl oroethane. -1,2-Dichloroethene (total). -Ch 1 or o f or m -1,2-Dichloroethane. -2-Butanone •1, 1, 1-Tr ichl oroethane. -Carbon Tetrachloride -Vinyl Acetate. -Br omod i c h 1 or omet hane. •1, 2-Dichloropropane. -c is-1,3-Dichloropropene. -Tr ichloroethene. -D i br omoc h 1 or omet hane. -1, 1, 2-Tr ichloroethant -Benzene -Trans-1, 3-D ichl or opr op ene. -Bromoform -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone. -2-Hexanone •Tetrac hi .1 t r. '?-
•Toluene •Chlorobe •Ethylben •Styrene
oroeth Tetrac
nzene_ zene
ene h 1 or o eth ane
-Total Xvlenes
FORM I VOA
C>\
11 11 11 11
> A 92 6 6 6 6 6 6
110 6 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
a
!U r-
lU \ lU \ B J J IB - • lU lU !U !U !U !U I I
lU lU !U !U iU !U !U !U IU IU IU !U IJ !U IU IU IU IU IU IU IU
\>
ur!.. 1/87 Re^
302430
IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5.
Level: (low/med) LOW
y. Moisture: not dec.- 13,
Column (pack/cap) PACK
0 (q/mL) G
EPA SAMPLE ND
BGH43 Contract: 68D90056
SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID: 910120-03
Lab File ID: E3402
Date Received: 03/06/91
Date Analyzed: 03/25/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Number TICs found: O CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG
CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC.
r .K 1 6 3
FORM I VOA-TIC 1 /87 Rev
3 0 2 4 3 1
lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
•' BGH44 Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 68D90056 I
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939 SAS No.: _ ^ _ _ _ _ SDG No.: BGH41
Matr i x: (soi I / w a t e r) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5^
Level: (low/med) LOUJ
y. Moisture: not dec. 16
Column: (pack/cap) PACK
<2 ( q / m L ) G_
Lab Sample ID: 910120-04
Lab F i l e ID: E3272
Date Rece ived : 0 3 / 0 6 / 9 1
Date Analyzed: 0 3 / 1 1 / 9 1
D i l u t i o n F a c t o r : 1.0
CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: ( u g / L or ug /Kq) UG/KG .- G! ?
-
! 74-87-3 Chloromethane ! 74-33-9 Bromomethane I 75-01-4 r Vinvl Chloride ' 7 ^ r ' \ t ' \ ^ ^ — . l^i^ 1 -». . ^ *- t-» T r. n
! 75-09-2 Methvlene Chloride ! 67-64-1 Acetone ! 75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide ! 75-35-4 1. 1-Dichloroethene ! 75-34-3—• 1. 1-Dichl oroethane 1 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) I 67-66-3 Ch 1 or o f or m ! 107-06-2 1, 2-Dichl or oet hane ! 78-93-3 2-Butanone I 71-55-6 1, 1, 1-Tr ichloroethane 1 56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride I 108-05-4 Vinvl Acetate 1 75—27-4 Br omod ichl or omet han e ! 73-87-5 • — 1 , 2-Dichl or oqropane I 10061-01-5 cis-1, 3-Dichl oropropene 1 79-01-6 Trichloroethene I 124-48-1 Dibromochl oromethane ; 79-00-5 1. 1. 2-Tr ichl oroethane I 71-43-2 Benzene 1 10061-02-6 Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene I I 75-25-2 Bromoform I 108-10-1— 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone 1 ! 591-78-6 2-Hexanone 1 1 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene I I 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-TetrachIoroethane I I 108-88-3 Toluene I I 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 1 ; 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene I 100-42-5— Styrene 1 I 1330-20-7 Total Xvlenes I
FORM I VOA
I 12 ! 12 I 12 I 12 I 28 I 63 • 1 6 ! 6 ! 6 I 5 I 17 I 6 1 55
6 1 6
12 I 6
6 6
29 6 6 3 6 ! 6 ' 9 ! 12 1 5 ! 6 I
120 1 6 1
35 ! 6 !
180 1
" • 171 3024
1
!U IU IU !U •yB:/
IU IU IU IJ I 1
!U 1
1
!U IU U IU u u u u J U T I u U 1 J 1
U I
U 1
U I
1/87
32
Rev
IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5. 0
Level: (low/med) LOW
y. Moisture: not dec. 16
Column (pack/cap) PACK
(q/mL) G
BGH44 Contract: S8D90056
SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID: 910120-04
Lab File ID: E3272
Date Received: 03/06/91
Date Analyzed: 03/11/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Number TICs found; CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG' /
CAS NUMBER =======:====:=====
1. 000000 2. 000000
COMPOUND NAME
Unknown C3-benzene isomer
RT ========:
25.02 32.06
EST. CONC. =============
21 17
Q
J J
FORM I VOA-TIC - » 1 7 2 302433
1/87 Rev
lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name:'CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5.,
Level: (low/med) LOW
Con tract: 68D90056
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BGH4 =
SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41
0 (q/mL) G
Lab Sample ID: 910120-0^
Lab File ID: E32S1
Date Received: 03/07/91
12 •/. Moisture: not dec.
Column: (pack/cap) PACK
Date Analyzed: 03/11/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
'0"-'
CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION (uq/L or uq/Kq)
UNITS: / UG/KG y - 0
• 7 .
I 7 4 - 3 7 - 3 Chloromethane I 11 1 7 4 - 3 3 - 9 Bromomethane I 11 I 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 Vinvl C h l o r i d e I 11 I 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 Chi o r o e t h a n e I 11
I 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 Acetone I " ^ 3 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 Carbon D i s u l f i d e I 6 ! 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 1, l - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e I 6 ! 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 • — - — 1 . 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 1 6 ! 5 4 0 - 5 9 - 0 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e ( t o t a l ) 1 6 I 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 Chloroform 1 6 I 107 -06 -2 1. 2 -Dich l o r o e t h a n e 1 6
1 / a 3^ J — .£. f u t a n w n e i 11 1 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 1. 1 . 1-Tr i c h l o r o e t h a n e I 6 1 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 - Carbon T e t r a c h l o r i d e I 6 1 108-05-4 Vinvl A c e t a t e I 11 1 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 Br omod i c h l or omet hane 1 6 I 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1, 2 - D i c h l o r o q r o p a n e I 6 I 10061-01-5 c i s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e 1 6
1 /:} y 1 o — — 1 r 1'_ n 1 or we u nene i o I 124-48-1 Dibr omoc hi or omet hane I 6 I 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 1, 1, 2-Tr i c h l o r o e t h a n e f 6 1 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 Benzene 1 6 1 10061-02-6 T r a n s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e I 6 I 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 Bromoform 1 6 1 103-10-1 4 - M e t h v l - 2 - P B n t a n o n e I 11 I 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 2-Hexanone 1 11 I 127 -18-4 T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e f • 6 1 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1, 1 , 2 . 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e I 6 1 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 —Toluene • 6 1 108 -90 -7 Ch lo robenzene 1 6 I 100-41-4 Ethvl benzene I 6 I 100 -42 -5 S t v r e n e I 6 1 1330-20-7 Tota l Xvlenes 1 6
!U IU IU IU !,BJ L \B^\y IU IU IU IU IU !U IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU lUJ" IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU
FORM I VOA t 190
1/87 Rev
302434
IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: , 5.0 (q/mL) G_
Lev/el: (low/med) LOW
y. Moisture: not dec. 12
Column (pack/cap) PACK
imtract: 68D9005S
SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NC
BGH4 =
SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID: 910120-05
Lab File ID: E32S1
Date Received: 03/07/91
Date Analvzed: 03/11/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q
IS
191
FORM I VOA-TIC 1 /87 Re^
302435
lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO,
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code; CEIMIC Case No
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/v/ol:
Lev/el: (low/med) LOW
y. Moisture: not dec. 15
Column: (pack/cap) PACK
1 5939
BGH47 Contract: 63090056
SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH-^l
0 (q/mL) G
Lab Sample ID: 910120-07
Lab File ID: E3270
Date Received: 03/09/91
Date Analyzed: 03/11/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG
Ch1 or omet hane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride. Chioroethane Methylene Chloride. Acetone Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichloroethane . 1, 2-Dichl or oet hene (total). Ch 1 or o f or m 1, 2-Dichl or oet hane • 2-Butanone 1 , 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e .
-Carbon T e t r a c h l o r i d e Vinyl A c e t a t e
—Bromodich lo rome thane . 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e c i s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e . Tr i c h l o r o e t h e n e D i br omoc h1 or omet hane 1, 1 ,2-Tr i c h l o r o e t h a n e . Benzene
- T r a n s - 1 , 3 -Dich l o r o p r o p e n e . Br omo for m 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone. 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane. Toluene Ch1 or obenz ene. Ethylbenzene Styrene Total Xylenes.
alpha-BHC b e t a - B H C d e l t a - B H C qamma-BHC H e p t a c h l o r A l d r i n H e p t a c h l o r E n d o s u l f a n D i e l d r i n
( L i n d a n e )
e p o x i d e I
4 . 4 ' - D D E E n d r i n E n d o s u l f a n 4 . 4 ' - D D D E n d o s u l f a n 4 , 4 ' - D D T M e t h o x y c h l E n d r i n k e t
I I
SLil f a t e
o r o n e
a l o h a - C h l o r d a n e q a m m a - C h l o r d a n e •Toxaphene A r o c l o r - 1 0 1 6 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2
-alpha-BHC. -beta-BHC_ delta-BHC -gamma-BHC (Lindane) -Hep t ac h 1 or -Aldrin -Heptachlor epoxide. -Endosulfan I -Dieldr in -4,4'-DDE -Endrin -Endosulfan II -4,4' -DDD - E n d o s u l f a n s u l f a t e - 4 , 4 ' - D D T . M e t h o x y c h l o r E n d r i n k e t o n e
- a l p h a - C h l o r d a n e . - g a m m a - C h l o r d a n e _ - T o x a p h e n e -Ar oc 1 or - 1 0 1 6 - A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 -Ar oc 1 or - 1 2 3 2 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 4 2 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 4 8 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 5 4 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 6 0
alpha-BH beta-BHC delta-BHC qamma-BHC Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Endosulfan Dieldr in
(Lindane)
epoxide I
4.4'-DDE Endr in Endosulfan 4,4'-DDD
II
-Endosul fan sulfate. -4,4' -DDT .' -Met hex yc h 1 or -Endrin ketone -alpha-Chlordane. -gamma-Chl or dane. -Toxaphene -Aroclor-1016_ - A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 l " -Aroc l o r - 1 2 3 2 . -Ar o d o r - 1 2 4 2 . -Aroc l o r - 1 2 4 8 . - A r o c l o r - 1 2 5 4 . -Aroc l o r - 1 2 6 0
a l p h a - B H C b e t a - B H C I d e l t a - B H C 1 qamma-BHC ( L i n d a n e ) I H e o t a c h l o r 1 A l d r i n H e p t a c h l o r e p o x i d e E n d o s u l f a n I D i e l d r i n 4 . 4 ' - D D E E n d r i n E n d o s u l f a n I I 4 . 4 ' - D D D E n d o s u l f a n s u l f a t e 4 . 4 ' - D D T • M e t h o x v c h l o r • E n d r i n k e t o n e • a l o h a - C h l o r d a n e •qamma-Chl o r d a n e •Toxaphene • A r o c l o r - 1 0 1 6 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 •Aroc l o r - 1 2 3 2 •Aroc l o r - 1 2 4 2 •Aroc l o r - 1 2 4 8 - A r o c l o r - 1 2 5 4 -Ar oc 1 o r - 1 2 6 0
IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU . IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU !U ( 1
FORM I PEST r . 1 6/^^ Rev
302443
ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 63D90056
EPA SAMPLE NG.
BGH47
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case N.p.: 15939 SAS No.
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30•5 (g/mL) G
Level; (low/med) LOW
y. Moisture: not dec. 15 dec.
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.1
SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID; 910120-07
Lab File ID:
Date Received: 03/09/91
Date Extracted: 03/15/91
Date Analyzed: 03/27/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS; (uq/L or ug/Kq) UG/KG Q
I 319-34-6 alDha-BHC 1 I 319-85-7 beta-BHC I I 319-86-3 delta-BHC I I 58-39-9 qamma-BHC (Lindane) I ! 76-44-8 Heptachlor 1 I 309-00-2 Aldrin I 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 1 I 959-98-8 Endosul fan I 1 60-57-1 Dieldr in I 72-55-9 4. 4' -DDE I 72-20-8 Endrin 1 33213-65-9 Endosul fan II 1 72-54-8 4. 4'-DDD I 1031-07-8 Endosul fan sulfate I 50-29-3 4. 4' -DDT I 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 1 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 1 5103-71-9 aloha-Chlordane I 5103-74-2 qamma-Chl ordane 1 8001-35-2 Toxaphene I 12674-11 -2 Ar oc 1 or -1016 I 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 I 11141-16-5 Aroc lor-1232 1 53469-21 -9 Ar oc 1 or -1242 1 12672-29-6 Aroc lor-1248 I 11097-69-1 Ar oc 1 or -1254 I 11096-82-5 Ar oc 1 or -1260
-alpha-BHC. -beta-BHC_I -delta-BHC. -qamma-BHC (Lindane) - H e p t a c h l o r . - A l d r i n - H e p t a c h l o r e p o x i d e . - E n d o s u l f a n I -Die l dr i n - 4 , 4 ' -DDE -Endr i n - E n d o s u l f a n I I - 4 , 4 ' -DDD -Endosul fan sulfate. -4,4' -DDT Methoxychlor Endrin ketone -al pha-Chl or dane. -gamma-Chl ordane. -Toxaphene -Aroclor-1016. -Aroclor-122l' -Aroc lor-1232. -Ar oc 1 or -1242. -Aroc lor-1248. -Aroclor-1254. -Aroc lor-1260
Q
f)79
FORM I PEST
302445
JIZS7 Rev,
ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 63D90056
EPA SAMPLE NG,
PBLK02
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G_
Level: (low/med) LOW
y. Moisture: not dec.
SDG No.: BGH41
Lab Sample ID: POO 15-B3
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
dec .
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:
Date Extracted: 03/15/91
Date Analyzed: 03/27/91
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q
319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 b et a-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 53-89-9 gamma-BHC (Lindane). 76-44-8 Hep t ac h 1 or \ 309-00-2 Al dr in 1024-57-3 Heptachl or epox ide 959-98-8 Endosul fan I 60-57-1 Dieldr in 72-55-9 4, 4' -DDE 72-20-8 Endr in 33213-65-9 Endosul fan II 72-54-8 4, 4' -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosul fan sul fate_ 50-29-3 4, 4' -DDT 72-43-5 Met h oxyc h 1 or 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 5103-71-9 al pha-Chl ordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Ch 1 or dane 8001-35-2 toxaphene 12674-11 -2 Ar oc 1 or -1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Ar oc 1 or -1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Ar oc 1 or -1248 11097-69-1 A r o c l o r - 1 2 5 4 11096-82-5 Ar oc 1 or -1260
-Phenol • ' -b i 5(2-Ch1 or oet hy1)Et her. -2-Ch 1 or op h en o 1 -1, 3-Dichl or obenz ene. -1,4-Dichlorobenzene. -Benzvl Alcohol -1, 2-Dichl or obenz ene. -2-Methvl phenol -b i s (2-Ch 1 or o i sop r op y 1) Et her. -4-Methylphenol -N-N i t r oso-D i-n-Pr opy1 am i ne. -He X ac h 1 or oet h an e -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol -2, 4-Dimethylphenol. -Benzolc Ac id -b i s(2-Ch1 oroethoxy)Methane. -2, 4-Dichlorophenol -1,2, 4-Tr ichl or obenz ene. -Naphthalene 4-Ch1 or oan iii ne Hexac h1 or obut ad i ene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -He X ac h 1 or ocy c 1 open t ad i ene. - 2 , 4 , 6-Tr i c h l o r o p h e n o l - 2 , 4 , 5 - T r i c h l o r o p h e n o l - 2 -Ch lo ronaph tha l ene -2-N i t r oan i 1 i ne -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthyl ene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene.
-3-Nitroanil ine. -Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene. Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. Fluor ene 4-Nitroanil ine 4,5-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1). 4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether_ He X ac h1 or ob en z ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate. Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzylphthalate 3,3'-Diehi orobenz idine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene b i s ( 2 - E t h y l h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e . D i -n -Oc ty l F^hthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Benz o(k)Fluor ant hene Benzo (a) Pyrene . Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
~ b i 5 ( 2 - C h l o r o e t h y l ) E t h e r . —2-Chl o rophenol
- 1 , 3 -Dichl or obenzene . • 1 , 4-D i ch l or obenzene . -Benzyl Alcohol •1 ,2 -Dich l o r o b e n z e n e . -2-MethvlPhenol - b i s ( 2 - C h l o r o i s o p r o p y l ) E t h e r -4-Met hy loheno l - N - N i t r o s o - D i - n - P r o p y l a m i n e . -Hexac hi o r o e t h a n e -N i t r ob en z ene -Isophorone
-2,4-Dimethylphenol -Benzoic Acid -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane. -2, 4-Dichlorophenol -1,2, 4-Tr ichl orobenzene. -Naphthalene 4-Ch1 or oan iii ne Hexac h1 or obut ad i ene -4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol. -2-Methyl naphthalene____ -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene. -2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol - 2 , 4 , 5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Nitroanil ine -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthyl ene 2.6-Dinitrotoluene
^-4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1). 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hexachl or obenzene -Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e
~F1 uor a n t h e n e . Pyrene Butyl b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e 3 , 3 ' - D i e h i orobenz i d i n e . Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
—--Benzo(k)Fluoranthene —-^-Ben z o (a) Pyr ene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene
—Benzo(g ,h , D P e r y l e n e
(1) - Cannot be s e p a r a t e d from Diphenylamine
1,3-Dichlorobenzene. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene. Benzyl Alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene. 2-Methylphenol -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether. -4-Methylphenol. ^ -N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine. -Hexachl or oethane ' -N i t r obenzene -Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol. -2, 4-Dimethylphenol, -Benzoic Acid -bis (2-Ch 1 or oet hoxy) Methane. -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. -Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexac h1 or oc yc1opent ad i ene. -2,4,5-Tr ichlorophenol -2, 4, 5-Tr ichlorophenol - 2 - C h l o r o n a p h t h a l e n e - 2 - N i t r o a n i l i n e - D i m e t h y l P h t h a l a t e . - A c e n a p h t h y l e n e . 2 , 6 - D i n i t r o t o l u e n e .
3-Nitroaniline. Ac enaphthen e 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene -Diethyl phthal ate. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroanil ine ' 4,5-D i n i t r o-2-Met hylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ HeX ac h 1 or obenz ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . F l u o r a n t h e n e Pyr ene Butyl benzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenz idine. Ben z o (a) An t h r ac en e Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluor ant hen e Benz o(k)Fluor anthene
—Ben z o(a)Pyr ene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene_ Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Phenol -b i s (2 -Ch1 or oe t h y l ) E t he r . - 2 - C h l o r o p h e n o l ' 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e . 1 ,4 -D ich lo robenzBne_ Benzy l A l c o h o l 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e . 2 - M e t h y l p h e n o l
-b i s (2-Ch 1 or o i sopr op y 1 ) Et her. -4 -Me thy l pheno l -N-N i t r oso-D i - n -Pr op y 1 am i ne. -Hexac h1 oroet hane -N i t r ob en z en e -1sop hor on e 2-N i t r ophenol. -2, 4-Dimethyl phenol. -Benzoic Acid -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane. -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2, 4-Tr ichl orobenzene. -Naphthalene -4-Chloroaniline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chl or o-3-Met hyl phenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexach1 or ocyc1opent ad i ene. -2,4, 5-Tr ichlorophenol -2,4, 5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Nitroaniline -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthyl ene^ 2,6-Dinitrotoluene.
3-N i t r oan i l.i ne. Acenaphthene 2,4-Din itrophenol 4-Nitrophenol D i b en z o f ur an 2,4-Dinitrotoluene. -Diethyl phthal ate. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hex ac h1 or ob enz ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene An t h r ac en e D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . Fluoranthene Pyrene^ Butyl benzylphthalate 3,3'-Diehi orobenz idine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chr ysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benz o(b)Fluor anthene Benz o(k)Fluor ant hene_ Benz o(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h, DPerylene
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
355 i/a-7,Rev
302459
IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G_
Lev/el: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 16
EPA SAMPLE NO,
BGH44 Con tract: 63D90056
SAS No,: SDG No.: BGH41
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONi:
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6,
Lab Sample ID: 910120-04
Lab File ID: D5364
Date Received: 03/06/91
Date Extracted: 03/15/91
Date Analvzed: 04/05/91
Dilution Factor: 1. 0
Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG
CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG
/
-: •' ' Q
108-95-2 Phenol 111-44-4 bis (2-Chl or oet hyl) Ether ____ 95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol 541 -73-1 1, 3-D ichl or ob enz ene 106-46-7 1, 4-Dichl or obenzene 100-51-6 Benzyl Alcohol 95-50-1—• 1, 2-Dichlorobenzene 95-48-7 2-Methyl phenol 108-50-1 b i s (2-Ch 1 or o i sop r opy 1 ) Ether. 106-44-5 4-Methylphenol ' ^ _ \ 621 -64-7 —N-N itr oso-D i -n -Pr op y 1 am i ne_ 67-72-1 Hexac hi or oet hane 98-95-3 Nitrobenzene 78—59-1 1 sop hor one 88-75-5— 2-Nitrophenol 105-67-9 2, 4-Dimethyl phenol 55-85-0 Benzoic Ac id 111-91-1 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane_ 120-83-2 2, 4-D ichl or ophenol 120-82-1 1,2, 4-Tr ichl or obenz ene 91-20-3 Naphthalene 106-47-8 4-Ch 1 or oan i 1 ine 87-68-3 Hexachl orobutadiene ' 59-50-7 4-Chl or o-3-Methyl phenol 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 77-47-4 Hexac h 1 or oc yc 1 opent ad i ene 88-05-2 2, 4, 6-Tr ichlorophenol 95-95-4 2,4, 5-Tr ichl or ophenol 91-58-7 2-Chl oronaphthal ene 88-74-4 2-Nitroanil ine 131-11-3 Dimethyl Phthalate 208-96-8 Acenaphthyl ene 606-20-2 2,5-Dinitrotoluene
-3-Nitroanil ine_ -Acenaphthene. 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene. -Diethylphthal ate. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether Fluor ene 4-Nitroaniline. 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hexachlorobenzene Pen t ac h1 or ophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene. D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . -Fl uor anthene . Pyrene. Butyl benzylphthalate. 3,3'-Dichlorobenz idine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene. bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n -Oc ty l P h t h a l a t e Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Benz o (k) Fl uor anthene. Benzo(a)Pyrene. Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
IU i I IU \ IU ! I IU ; I IU : I IU . I IU ; I IU • 1 lU i I IU '• 1 IU j 1 IU j I IU I I U ! I l u ; 1 IU 1 IU 1 luj 1 IU i I IU I lU 1 IU i 1 IJ IU IU IU IU IU . IU ^ IU ; 1 1
1
J I
302462
1/87 Rev.
IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP
Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30.3 (q/mL) 6
Level: (low/med) LOW
y. Moisture: not de
Extract ion:
13 dec
EPA SAMPLE NC.
BGH4 = Contract: 63D90056
SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH4 1
SONC (Sep F/Con t/Son c)
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH; 6.0
Lab Sample ID: 910120-05
Lab File ID: D5312
Date Received: 03/07/91
Date Extracted: 03/15/91
Date Analyzed: 04/02/91
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Number TICs found: 20 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG
bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether. 2-Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl Alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene. '2-Met hy 1 phenol -b i s(2-Ch1 or o i sopr opy1)Ether. -4-Methylphenol -N-N i t r oso-D i-n-Propy1 am ine. -Hexachloroethane -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone
-2,4-Dimethylphenol -Benzoic Acid -b i s (2-Chl or oet hoxy) Methane. -2, 4-Dichlorophenol -1, 2, 4-Tr ichl orobenzene. -Naphthalene 4-Ch1 or oan i1ine Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene. -2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol -2,4,5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthaiene -2-Nitroaniline -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthylene_ 2,5-Dinitrotoluene.
—Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4, 6-Din itro-'2-Methyl phenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4 - B r o m o p h e n y l - p h e n y l e t h e r _ Hexach lo robenzene P e n t a c h l o r o p h e n o l P h e n a n t h r e n e ; Anthracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e .
—Fluoranthene Pyrene. -Butyl benzyl phthal ate. 3,3'-Dichlorobenz idine, Benzo(a)Anthracene Chr ysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n -Oc ty l P h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e
—'•—Benzo (k) Fl uor a n t h e n e Ben z o ( a ) P y r e n e ' I n d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) P y r e n e . Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene
Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether. -2-Chlorophenol -1, 3-Dichl orobenzene. -1, 4-D ichl or obenz ene. -Benzyl Alcohol -1, 2-Dichl orobenzene. -2-Met hyl phenol -bis (2-Chloroisopropyl )Ether. -4-Methylphenol -N-N itr oso-D i-n-Pr opy1 am i n e. -Hexachloroethane -N i t r ob en z en e -1sophor one
2-N itr ophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -Benzoic Acid - b i s (2-Chl o r o e t h o x y ) M e t h a n e . -2, 4 - D i c h l o r o p h e n o l - 1 , 2 , 4-Tr i c h l o r o b e n z e n e . -Naphtha lene 4-Ch1 or oan i 1 i n e Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene. -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene_ -2-Nitroanil ine ^___ -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthylene 2,5-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroanil ine. —Acenaphthene — 1 , 4-Dinitrophenol, 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2 , 4 - D i n i t r o t o l u e n e . Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. F1uor en e 4-Nitroanil ine ' 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine C1). 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hex ac h 1 or ob enz ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene An-thracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . Fluoranthene Pyrene Butv/1 benzyl phthal ate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Benz o(k)Fluor anthene Ben z o(a)Pyr ene Indenod , 2, 3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h, DPerylene
I Aluminum ' I Antimony 1 Arsenic I Barium I Beryllium 1 Cadmium 1 Calcium 1 Chromium 1 Cobalt 1 CoDoer 1 Iron 1 Lead IMaqnesium 1 Manqanese I Mercury I Nickel I Potassium
I Silver I Sodium 1 Thallium I Vanadium I Zinc .ICvanide
1 )
Concentration 1C1 t
8360.00 1 1 5.50 IB 6.101 . '
42.201B' 0.251B' 0.231U
448.00 IB 8. 50 1 8.50IB
26.10 1 17200.00!
27.30! 2920.00! 709.00 1
0.10IU 16.00 1
801.00!B
0.46IU I 31.90 IB : 0.67IU I 5.40 IB • 64.50 I I 5.70IU 1 1
1 1 1 (
Q IM I 1 1
IP I
N c r '^ '• •F I ' == 1 1 P I IP 1 IP I IP 1
^ IP I E J IP 1
:P I IF 1 IP 1 IP 1
N ^ lev I ^ IP I
. IP I
IP I 1 IP I
U IF I I IP I
IP ; I I A S I
1 1
Color Before: BROUN
Color A^j^^r: BROUN
C.imments:
GLASS, ROOTS. STONES
Clarity Before:
Clarity After:
Texture: - MEDIUM
Artifacts:.YES
•'•^
^i0Q»0S
•ORM I - IN 3/J50. 302476
#
APPENDIX C
FIELD LOGBOOK PAGES
A92-470.txt C-1
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / r 4 ALLIANCE
M ^ ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Cofporaiion
302477
•fp h z . p 5 9 • ' ( ^ ^
"ENFORCEIIiENTCOIiFiBE™!-'
- ' ' i ^w ^ftttriift::.ii, 'iViA»« i,s if^i. .'ii.%t-' t ui4 ..-;
/ j i i r ^ ^
?^ '5
ise
U O c ^ i L Cjv .<^^
i I 3 5 j 5
om\s
P\«fX
/4<te±
4£A
c^
K J ^ Q u :..^.
v.e
Fre-nV- '^!)OQ^h
IL i i r t 5 . .
^>£i2
(X7f
^ i / ^ e .
-fe
UJlh^iLUL^
cLkz n. X
-B
2r Skfltlrct-
j ^ 2
^ ^
XjuL^'ionJn
ICOSL. V^a-^U
i:
/111
Jcx r ^ i ^ ^ ^ i ••
^ M - ^ i j Q ^ ^ - C ^ d d d .
R
hsc
.11 C
^
Ct .
^ h r j <' -
^ ^
izd
- « j
C./LitiAAiM.i
z^. sS-Cft^ l
v^^ > t
kaicuz
:ni
^ g e W F | e J G
Grl^irf<
Lizu
uk<\^
•3'?-P"G • o n
3t
M MTCJ
p^JL^l
f^
j lc t ru
-^^
i:- ( jn€
V : -
a
£:UZid
i«^ r-€r
fici-
Bi <rr(u(
"rv **-
!Z2^bz/
S c i
a)
^ oH slu/l'/9//[f.$lsd^-/|i//4L
.s_ .
SnulUtiA
dl lA. f
ScJ^a^i
S
/vjAi-e<
^ -4=^ -
zLuMi u. Ul
^
a i
hj
CO
< * OJ o n
S"
ifJyyV^XCu C. Ofjuy^yr- 23 ^<fg ' i /
rU I ,: ; 2 - ? , f [ - { ) • ' ) I
O l • ' C 1
\ \ ' \ ..cc\ .A .kc__^C. ^J:LC_^.i ^r*JC^.h-£<^t
^ . I 'nck.
„_O:>JL>.
^<l!i>i .„ ._N
_t{)u„o.. M
<[5o Ui p r
Tl
C ' * l l l -Otboui_..rVh
7 ^^•c-
''JL-.a_l+.!i-for GoUg^ •
• j:V ^ . t r - .o k. „3 :^JJ :^VU_ r f f j.|4 t
faJQC<\?J vin b_VAkL
L_j£jC^"l 1L.t|i_t^.(L
V.Cl 5 ^ : i : t c j . „ - . . . S ^ k ^5 - _A,^__Ed.lf^
.^.__Ui
C.i\-fc-
•pCciA 4:\.Qi\'>-
cJL Asj<;'A.<^_^.i_..^tk<L
iC. ^V/"i T '
^ ...o.a V o.c.c\-±[ o f!C„
i I y T
rA spec I i/r^cl. /
4 j : i < j—:
T ( R ' i i - ) 2 3 r t (b '^ i l " 1 ^ ' •'• ,
Pe t i L v
^
' Oo'HA ?_
IL :LS;
\v o^b
c «
:V . J A :
^ t '
Oi >\F' '.
H
V.t
H sj-
•th\
i Z r t d s
^ S l
V€
O. A
a'lLCViS^?
lAJ
i •Al
tUZ.1
lAitds
-F
% } 2 C J
i W i i ^ l l r j .
kx
itm^A
pfi j ioi
1 1 . ^
L L ^
3 ^ .
(>
u.<i
:±
AJ.\
\c}L^i^
^
)ldl\
J l QJUL
• ^ ' i . C ' ^
• ^
|t DC?*'
'lxi'.U.
m ( S - i
^ t n
U t'vyi.7
m v / s < :
. ^ J L
DQ^k^
i-n L ^
' :L j . in
±o__it.
\ j r~
^
^ . S
y c«?
V-oi'
^ : / n
.4/< vc?Ls
.rp_ -7-
.A»'
s [-4
0>(1
~CLB
i grv :
i:
^a,
kL
:a./:
n f - U' 0
^^
•-KgiiM
^
z/: l /L^^l,
- W ^
/,^y.
/ I j j i
1 a l /
\ €
£ :iiL}
Jc
1
aa
-f,U
u.^^
I SI.
xCLjx
oA
C U
iM-a UU
M -{U
f-
a£L<ULIajn.
Ox JO
<xc
A.,
UM
i-AL_€,
LJL -C I
ii^£-V
a j n 3 ^
1-5
CA
(L
dc xM-e.
W' <L!^r\oi\
l i J
K£
a
'iig-
.0
e n <* CM O
n
c i ^
S I •t
c U
^ 3
' ^ t U i l t r j J
Oi)'-
Q ^
' ^ y y i o A A ^ ^ C OCLMA^ ' ^ / 2 S / 9 /
<1
»030
l l h v ' S ' / U ^ . > < c ^
— ' T - ' -r-
I , i • I ' 1
/o<is
-Tv^-/ L j p ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 /•A / I . . .
O-J -z l>chn^\ -h/^^s r^ti^^l u . ^
- -3
U':1
Ui/zM „_../^^4^_f^ ^„5t?d-k ! i | ^
_ 1 . Q t d ly i:_.-,.. J/rj \:.C.. -_^L>^<:LA<^ ! I - Jy^i-)! .1 ^^.fU^,,^X i- A'LOih.y..^^jXnctr-r^k-
i \
U b± £ \0-ix
Zci-
A-L t^kJL
±c L e~ f ' l ^ (x i S -
iJ^Tiki'L
m
I z -
l U L i L
^'nuia
L
^^fx
^ .
d o
JLL
/ C L - T
AdUi-± k i
M ^
j o A l
4 ^
U ^ ^'-^-U
w
B
, z5 pee, " \ ^ ^
f cL'Jifn
ri^li^jL
JHfLtl
i j n
I 6)tZ/dL_
.ilLx »2ii
Mc/5-- '-
J! j2L i i__! i f^L i2 ]
20
P
f ' - ^ ^ ^ s . .
/c
'J-
k.U
tJd.
A
/7. M/^ t^//
o , "
L!y_
^ i?»2i
^ ' • ^
/ / t ie .i/'^^oi'
k
^? p^o/n
/ ^
/A_
C/oJicl^sL
^^4p
IdirhtC. L\A.
U ' i
m
i .± IscetlAkLi
fac/lje^^
i j l h
U^
(^ fp/K
O CO
o n
r
£^iL^-
h-£^
I.
'T^'Tayu^ C.J2cc.r^yi^ ^/Zfi/^,
?w»^'A"?5i*y^f
•^''••!i' '^Stf^1'<>i*S%
G
115.1
- • 5 ' .
/ / 3 S
..' ^ . . . ' <-- 5 . ? i.j .. , .
..Cl?.n._..-:^t5....l57'=?.
//.4-4-
h '^o
l^r..
.Ui.^A
^Lfl h. m ^ ^ \ (^_^ T / ' - / . jbf nt _:^..'5
5 ^ />
/ P / 5
. ; 7 L _ _ - _ ^ - /
5 ' C
C3f-<?o^ ? hr^a^4^ : / o r }^/^'^cl-^
jV.f: li !_-<. ^c< J t^.nvL /'<-f _ ^
J ^ ! / / / j ^ z - j J / i / i e ^
0>
-^5d& /2(f r:_
^ m U L . 6-J2uynX V?8 /9 /
£2£;:^4U9: iJ i : ; ; i i^ !*S^;^£; i t ;^^
Lk^.^dA-^r^r^'-^tja^sAi^^^ ^mii ' '» 'p^^^ C . AJcc^f^y?x. Z - Z ^ s j / ? /
M) \ - j i'-
2?) RV,-)\ y i^'^'j': ^ ^ ) r | f ( ^ ^ ^
" T ? ^
r.-i.r<- .,
) . ' -Of 5'..i.>„0.O
S:TI
' ^ ^ c / ^
V-___^u:n-
a
A A A A
/ ^
'M^ 7fM '•UZ/-7 ^ j i l y J j J ^ '
Tci /WK.--77/-/
c:2»
mm
, . t&'
i v-t-c. ^ / w 4 f e ^ > c p / ' ^ ^ k f / k ^
^ n f ^ U \ A > ' < ^ l/c^J^s
; | /^M rija^^^^*/^ W 3 c^ -
'.•.i mmmi msirmmiii &imML
^ , i^^__ „i:^J«!_^^^-^^rl^)^)/y_
i A(i:
3:^Ve&SA
Ik^lfmiMi
y M ^ ^ ^ r ^ ^ 4
i ' k t . : * / ? a ± ^ U ^ > i l * ^ ' ^ y ) i i S i h i ^
..^A:^A....&.j./i...L„...:r' i^.^-lt^p. - I (ly-i • l -j "-v r ^
' / ' ' l a i d r y. \ . . 7 — ,, ,j ; i , , ;4A. 'o / /^^
AS
Ail^
i "^ i:
y!^hMj^
%c^\\\ Il^ra
i A P l ^ l = . /\ii akci^xje^ 'A
j j ^ ^ .
rLA
ILll ^^k ..A' SdS i t t ^X... |_Xi-nr i-£. -5>J. iYX • >
.i^/7-
\ ' ; ;
i 5 3a
:x^iii-
f.A
-?
4 ^
LL y
^-
x -» i /
F.
^ ^
C5;0
yJic.
' ^ U J
^ ^ :
:i^M ^ ^
-z
Z yAtO''
r_UL.i_|_<:di
.p
/ •
^ ' = i _ I S i
— ' - I
-7-
. . ^
i rulpA
:d^
V ^ i / -
00
o
o n
r ± < ^ ^
.L]3±m
..ciA.L:ji^-_lrve_'^
'A-/
. 5 : _ - / : i M , ^
-S/ ^ x
^Wbf\ \£,^
.S^':42:)p£!l4-
iri3d
Liuy^J .t>
i d
{:>cc'Z^£4
2- ixi
i i - / : ^
^A.iL ~Li'^.
' / - :
C^-^o £
iOi^
:S d^
jaLoJ^^itL MikW
" • ' ^^ca^os ' ^^
•••••^^»v;af»-ri-f-'*-;
^"-'' o 6 M(Nt-A\ ' I ^ I L j ( ^
(5W oe:
7 ('"O'j ^ »iy(lV\fi>vl./\
, .......siy: . .
......I.. VJ t l ,.^, A 0 5 ' ^ i ; D t :
^ i ? i ' ' • ^ -
- ,J3^ lo1,(>
: ! . : -
?56
) --AS.fL'
A>;r>\ J- \oC
/ S s s . I >S^>e Ct// /v-i^Mu/, 3, d o f .^ . .
r\ ,
.-AyhAi/ti^e.S... 'r}<i:<-/.aAe.L I^^&JLOJ^^.
_ /27.<kcA,ixA^rw..\<y-... p.lctCJL.. C ^ ^ k j i s ^ l L \ o i y L y : / j ' I I • i
. : e j c C j i J y ^ i M - ^ . \CLyuLy?U.i... ± . . . p l d l r ^
^ r ^ d j t - f ^ r -W. . . ^ r ^ n . L . l ^ ^ ±..Zi.\i
.... C (^..^^.U.>ll\....deJo..<^U.^...\^ J ij-
W/T^WUX^ C J2cXn.A^ oQ/^/f/2.cji
V
• 'A '
V: .'
• -J
•*-»
k
V .'
Q>
iC IT C\
)
k
APPENDIX D
PERSONNEL ON SITE
3 0 2 5 1 0 A92-470.txt D-1 I
RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 #4^4 ALLIANCE
M 4 ^ ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion
PERSONNEL ON SITE
THURS 28 FEB91
Don Miller Frank Booth Bill Bingham Carl Dannenberger Jeff Gage Frank Buchalski Jerry Bertulis George Renfer Morris Waters Maria Dunn Steve Joyce John Monaco, Jr.
FRI 01 MAR91
Don Miller Frank Booth Bill Bingham Carl Dannenberger Jeff Gage Frank Buchalski Jerry Bertulis George Renfer Morris Waters Maria Dunn
MON 04 MAR91
Carl Dannenburger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Morris Waters Frank Buchalski Frank Booth Bill Bingham Maria Dunn
COMPANY
Golder Associates Golder Associates Golder Associates Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Alliance, Waste Management Waste Management
Golder Associates Golder Associates Golder Associates Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Alliance
Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance
Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Morris Waters Frank Buchalski Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn
TUES 05 MAR91
Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Frank Buchalski Morris Waters Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn
WED 06 MAR91
Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Frank Buchalski Morris Waters Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn Steve Joyce Pat Spooner Jeff Jeep Debra Rothberg
Frank Queris Barbara Yeoman
COMPANY
Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance
-
Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance
Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance Waste Management Waste Management Waste Management Attorney for Waste Management Waste Management "River Reporter" (newspaper)