REINVIGORATING OLEORESIN COLLECTION IN THE SOUTHEAST USA: EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL INDUCERS, STAND MANAGEMENT, TREE CHARACTERISTICS, AND GENETICS By MARIE JENNIFER LAUTURE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017
275
Embed
REINVIGORATING OLEORESIN COLLECTION IN THE SOUTHEAST … · reinvigorating oleoresin collection in the southeast usa: evaluation of chemical inducers, stand management, tree characteristics,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
REINVIGORATING OLEORESIN COLLECTION IN THE SOUTHEAST USA: EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL INDUCERS, STAND MANAGEMENT, TREE
CHARACTERISTICS, AND GENETICS
By
MARIE JENNIFER LAUTURE
A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
Problem .................................................................................................................. 22 Research Objectives ............................................................................................... 24
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE .................................................................................... 25
Introduction to Oleoresin ......................................................................................... 25
Historical Production of Oleoresin .................................................................... 25 Species Used Worldwide of Oleoresin Production ........................................... 26
Oleoresin Composition ..................................................................................... 28 Oleoresin and Insect Pests ..................................................................................... 30
Coevolution of Oleoresin and Insect Pests ....................................................... 30 Host Selection and Colonization Behavior of Insect Pests ............................... 31
Conifer Defenses Against Insect Pests ............................................................ 34 Climate Change and Pine Beetles .................................................................... 35
Genetic Variation in Oleoresin ................................................................................ 37 Variation of Oleoresin Composition Among Species ........................................ 37
Variation of Oleoresin Canal Occurrence, Size and Density ............................ 41 Variation of Oleoresin Yield and Flow Rate Among Species ............................ 45
Oleoresin Viscosity and Crystallization Rate Among Species .......................... 49 Oleoresin Production in Planted Versus Natural Forests.................................. 51
Inducing Oleoresin Flow and Yield ......................................................................... 52 Chemical Inducers ............................................................................................ 52
Climate and seasons ................................................................................. 61 Water availability ........................................................................................ 64
7
Stand density management ....................................................................... 67
Fertilization................................................................................................. 68 Fire ............................................................................................................. 70
Genetic Control and Breeding for Increased Terpene Production .................... 77 Global Uses for Oleoresin ................................................................................ 80
Pine terpenes for commercial products ...................................................... 80 Pine terpenes for biofuels .......................................................................... 81
Distillation ......................................................................................................... 84 Economics of Oleoresin Production ........................................................................ 84
Non-Timber Forest Products ............................................................................ 84 Oleoresin Tapping and Timber Production ....................................................... 86
Global Supply and Demand .............................................................................. 87 Market requirements .................................................................................. 87
Global production ....................................................................................... 87 What Drives the Production Cost? ................................................................... 89
Cost Compared to other Biofuels ............................................................... 91
3 ASSESSING EFFECTS OF STAND MANAGEMENT, TREE
CHARACTERISTICS, AND CHEMICAL STIMULANT ON OLEORESIN PRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 99
Study Areas .................................................................................................... 101 Borehole Tapping and In-Tree Injection ......................................................... 103
Chemical Stimulants ....................................................................................... 105 Data Collection ............................................................................................... 105
Tapping Area .................................................................................................. 106 Statistical Analysis .......................................................................................... 108
Results .................................................................................................................. 110 General Summary of Oleoresin Yield ............................................................. 110
Stand Age ....................................................................................................... 112 Collection Days .............................................................................................. 113
Chemical Stimulants ....................................................................................... 113 Tree Size ........................................................................................................ 115
Stand Management ........................................................................................ 115 Tapping Area .................................................................................................. 116
Discussion ............................................................................................................ 117 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................... 121
4 CHEMICAL STIMULANT DOSAGE AND CARRIER SOLVENTS IN THE BOREHOLE METHOD TO INCREASE OLEORESIN YIELD IN SLASH PINE .... 144
Methods ................................................................................................................ 146 Study Areas .................................................................................................... 146
Borehole Tapping ........................................................................................... 147 Chemical Stimulants ....................................................................................... 147
Data Collection ............................................................................................... 148 Statistical Analysis .......................................................................................... 148
Study Area ...................................................................................................... 167 Study Design and Genetic Material ................................................................ 168
A COMPARING OLEORESIN YIELD BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR
INDIVIDUAL SITES DURING THE 2013 TO 2015 TAPPING SEASONS ............ 195
B COMPARING OLEORESIN YIELD BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT AND IN TREE INJECTION FOR INDIVIDUAL SITES DURING THE 2014 AND 2015 TAPPING SEASONS ............................................................................................ 198
C SLASH PINE OLEORESIN TAPPING OPTIMIZATION TRIALS .......................... 202
Study Areas .................................................................................................... 202 Borehole Tapping ........................................................................................... 203
Chemical Stimulants ....................................................................................... 204 Data Collection ............................................................................................... 206
High Gum Yielding Slash Pine ....................................................................... 210 Big-Small ........................................................................................................ 211
Triple Borehole Test ....................................................................................... 212 Opposing Side ................................................................................................ 212
Study Area ...................................................................................................... 242 Study Design and Genetic Material ................................................................ 244
Table page 2-1 Average annual oleoresin yield in different regions from various pine species
using different tapping methods. A minimum of 2 kg per tree annually is necessary to be economically viable for commercial production. Data retrieved from Hodges 1995, Tadesse et al. 2001, Rodrigues et al. 2011, Cunningham 2012, and Rodríguez-García et al. 2014, Hadiyane et al. 2015..... 94
2-2 Average cost of oleoresin tapping operation in various countries based on hourly wage and quantity of oleoresin collected per resin tapper. Cost is based on United States dollar. Data retrieved from Cunningham 2014. ............. 95
3-1 Summary of treatments for oleoresin tapping during the 2013 to 2015 field study. ................................................................................................................ 122
3-2 Summary of sites selected for oleoresin tapping during the 2013 to 2015 field study. ................................................................................................................ 123
3-3 Summary of main and interactive effects on oleoresin yield in sites using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model with covariates. ............................................................... 124
3-4 Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yield by site using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates. ....................................................... 125
3-5 Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yield by stand using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates. ....................................................... 126
3-6 Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yield by chemical treatment using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates. .................. 127
3-7 Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yields by collection days drilled using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates. .................. 128
3-8 Summary of oleoresin yields by stand age from tapping slash pine using the borehole tapping method. ................................................................................. 129
3-9 Summary of oleoresin yields per collection day by age from tapping slash pine trees using the borehole tapping method. ................................................. 130
11
3-10 Summary of oleoresin yields per collection day by age from tapping slash pine trees using the borehole tapping method. The trees were tapped between summer and early fall 2013-2015. ...................................................... 131
3-11 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment from tapping slash pine using the borehole tapping method. ................................................................. 132
4-1 Summary of oleoresin tapping dosage and carrier solvent experiments in 2014-2016. ....................................................................................................... 156
4-2 Effects of methyl jasmonate carrier solvent, DBH, height and crown volume on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard borehole tapping method. .................................................................. 157
4-3 Estimated cost per tree of borehole tapping method to collect oleoresin. Calculated costs are based on productivity rates of tapping 26.7 trees per hour and applying 400 mM of methyl jasmonate diluted in 90% ethanol. ......... 158
5-1 Summary of genotypes selected in each replicate of the CCLONES 2 study. .. 177
5-2 Least square means with standard errors for phenotypic traits measured at the CCLONES 2 study. ..................................................................................... 178
5-3 Tukey significance group letters of the least square means for phenotypic traits measured at the CCLONES 2 study (alpha < 0.05) recorded in Table 5-2. ...................................................................................................................... 179
5-4 Broad sense heritability estimates calculated for phenotypic traits measured at the CCLONES 2 study. ................................................................................. 180
5-5 Summary of main and interactive effects on long-term oleoresin yields at the CCLONES 2 site using the borehole tapping method in 2016 based on a general linear clonal model. .............................................................................. 181
5-6 Summary of variance components of genetic correlation between short-term and long-term oleoresin yield in the CCLONES 2 site. ..................................... 182
A-1 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 1 site during the 2013 tapping season. Stand age is 14 years old. ............................................. 195
A-2 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 1 site during the 2013 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. ....................................... 195
A-3 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 2 site during the 2013 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old. ....................................... 195
A-4 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Bradford 1 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 11 years old. ....................................... 195
12
A-5 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 3 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. ....................................... 195
A-6 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 1 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. ............................................. 196
A-7 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 2 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking. ........................................................................................ 196
A-8 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 4 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old. ....................................... 196
A-9 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 5 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old. ....................................... 196
A-10 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Bradford 1 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 12 years old. ....................................... 196
A-11 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 3 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. ....................................... 197
A-12 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 1 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. ............................................. 197
A-13 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 2 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking. ........................................................................................ 197
A-14 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 4 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old. ....................................... 197
A-15 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 5 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old. ....................................... 197
B-1 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Bradford 1 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 11 years old. .... 198
B-2 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Alachua 3 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. ..... 198
B-3 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Union 1 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. ........ 198
B-4 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Union 2 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking. ....................................................... 199
13
B-5 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Alachua 4 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old. ..... 199
B-6 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Alachua 5 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old. ..... 199
B-7 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Bradford 1 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 12 years old. .... 200
B-8 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Alachua 3 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. ..... 200
B-9 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Union 1 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. ........ 200
B-10 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Union 2 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking. ....................................................... 201
B-11 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Alachua 4 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old. ..... 201
B-12 Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Alachua 5 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old. ..... 201
C-1 Summary of oleoresin tapping optimization experiments for slash pine in 2014-2016. ....................................................................................................... 221
C-2 Chemical treatment and improved genetic effects on average oleoresin yield per tree (kg) from slash pine trees using the standard borehole tapping method in 2014. ................................................................................................ 222
C-3 Summary of main and interactive effect on oleoresin yields in high gum and non-high gum site based on a general linear model. ........................................ 223
C-4 DBH, height, crown volume, and effect of chemical stimulant on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the big-small borehole tapping method. ................................................................................................ 224
C-5 Summary of main and interactive effect on oleoresin yields in site drilled using the big-small borehole tapping method based on a general linear model. ............................................................................................................... 225
C-6 Effects of tapping treatment, DBH, height and crown volume on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the triple borehole (two inner holes) tapping method and stimulated by methyl jasmonate. .......... 226
14
C-7 Effects of chemical stimulant and DBH on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the opposing side borehole tapping method. .... 227
C-8 Effects of chemical stimulant and number of boreholes on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the automated borehole tapping method. ............................................................................................................ 228
C-9 Effects of chemical stimulant and DBH on total oleoresin yield (kg) and oleoresin yield per borehole (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the 6 borehole and standard borehole tapping method. ................................... 229
C-10 Effects of chemical stimulant on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the 8-borehole tapping method. ......................................... 230
C-11 Effects of chemical stimulant, DBH, height and crown volume on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the 8-borehole tapping method. ............................................................................................................ 231
C-12 Effects of number of boreholes on tapping intensity and oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees using the 6 and 8 borehole taping method. ...... 232
C-13 Summary of optimization treatments, number of boreholes, collection days, chemical inducers and oleoresin yields. ........................................................... 233
C-14 Estimated cost per tree of borehole tapping method to collect oleoresin. Calculated costs are based on productivity rates of tapping 26.7 trees per hour for the manual drilling and 61 trees per hour for the automated drilling. ... 234
D-1 Summary of genotypes planted in each replicate of the CFGRP pseudo backcross hybrid study. .................................................................................... 250
D-2. Least square means with standard errors for phenotypic traits measured at the pseudo-backcross hybrid study.. ................................................................ 251
D-3 Tukey significance group letters of the least square means for phenotypic traits (alpha < 0.05) recorded in Table D-2. ...................................................... 252
D-4 Disease and mortality observed at the end of the 3rd growing season in the two replicate treatments of the pseudo-backcross hybrid. ................................ 253
D-5 Percentage of trees with stem form issues at the end of the 3rd growing season in the pseudo-backcross hybrid study. ................................................. 254
D-6 Narrow sense heritability estimates calculated for phenotypic traits measured at the end of the 3rd growing season in the pseudo-backcross hybrid study.... 255
15
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page 2-1 Processes of that lead to successful beetle colonization and conifer defenses
with interfering processes used by each organism to prevent the other’s success. Adapted from Wood 1982, Raffa et al. 1993, Phillips and Croteau 1999, Raffa et al. 2005, Faccoli and Schlyter 2007. ........................................... 96
2-2 Diagrams of borehole tapping designs. .............................................................. 97
2-3 Oleoresin distillation process adapted from Coppen 1995. ................................ 98
3-1 Calculations for the cross-sectional tapping area and individual hole area model for the trees with DBH greater than 10.16 cm. ....................................... 133
3-2 Calculations for the cross-sectional tapping area and individual hole area model for the trees with DBH less than 10.16 cm. ............................................ 134
3-3 Age effect on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons. ................... 135
3-4 Chemical effect on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons .......... 136
3-5 Chemical effects of oleoresin yield (g) per day with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons. ........................................................................................................... 137
3-6 Nonlinear regression displaying the actual relationship between average oleoresin yield (kg) in slash pine and DBH in cm for all trees tapped in the 2013 to 2015 tapping season. .......................................................................... 138
3-7 Effect of pine straw management and thinning on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons. .............................................................................. 139
3-8 Chemical effect on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons under different management scenarios. ................................................................................... 140
3-9 Bivariate fit of total tree yield of oleoresin (kg) in slash pine by tapping intensity. ........................................................................................................... 141
3-10 Bivariate fit of sector area yield of oleoresin in slash pine by tapping intensity. 142
3-11 Bivariate fit of hole area yield of oleoresin in slash pine by tapping intensity. ... 143
16
4-1 Chemical dose effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard tapping method. The different doses are methyl jasmonate concentrations (50 mM, 100 mM, and 400 mM) and ethephon percentages (1%, 5%, and 10%) ................................ 160
4-2 Chemical dose effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard tapping method. .............. 161
4-3 Cumulative flow rate of oleoresin (g) since day of tapping treatment by chemical treatment at the 2015 dose response test. ........................................ 162
4-4 Cumulative flow of oleoresin (g) and resin flow rate over time since day of tapping treatment in Gainesville at the 2015 methyl jasmonate dose response test. ................................................................................................... 163
4-5 Effect of carrier solvent on oleoresin yield (kg) for 100 Mm methyl jasmonate when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida using the standard borehole drilling method. ................................................................................................. 163
4-6 Chemical dose effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in 2016 using the standard tapping method.. ............. 165
5-1 Layout of the University of Florida’s CCLONES 2. ........................................... 183
5-2 Least square means with standard errors for oleoresin traits measured at the CCLONES 2 study.. .......................................................................................... 184
5-3 Bivariate fit of total long-term tree yield of oleoresin (g) in slash pine by DBH (cm).. ................................................................................................................ 185
5-4 Bivariate fit of total long-term clonal mean oleoresin yield (g) in slash pine by DBH (cm) .......................................................................................................... 186
5-5 Bivariate fit of short-term tree yield of oleoresin (g) in slash pine by DBH (cm). ................................................................................................................. 187
5-6 Bivariate fit of short-term and long-term oleoresin yield (g).. ............................ 188
C-1 Diagrams of borehole tapping designs.. ........................................................... 236
C-2 Calculations for the cross-sectional tapping area and individual hole area model for the trees tapped using the 8-borehole method.. ............................... 237
C-3 Chemical effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard method and the big-small tapping method.. ........................................................................................................... 238
17
C-4 Chemical effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida in 2014 using the automated drilling technique.. ........................................................................................................ 239
C-5 Predicted cumulative flow of oleoresin (g) by chemical treatment since day of tapping treatment at the 2014 8 borehole test. ................................................. 240
C-6 Bivariate fit of total tree oleoresin yield (kg) in slash pine by tapping intensity using the 6 and 8 borehole methods. ............................................................... 241
D-1 Pedigree of the genotypes planted in the pseudo backcross hybrid study using a Latinized row-column design. ............................................................... 256
D-2 Layout of the pseudo backcross hybrid study using a Latinized row-column design. .............................................................................................................. 257
D-3 Codes used for the pseudo backcross hybrid study. ........................................ 258
18
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CCLONES
CFGRP
Comparing Clonal Lines on Experimental Sites
Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program at the University of Florida
DAP Diammonium phosphate {(NH4)2HPO4}; with the following formulation: 18-46-0 (N-P-K)
DBH
DI
FBRC
FS
H2
h2
OP
Diameter at breast height (1.4 meters)
Deionized
Forest Biology Research Cooperative
Full-Sib
Broad-sense heritability
Narrow sense heritability
Open pollinated
19
Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
REINVIGORATING OLEORESIN COLLECTION IN THE SOUTHEAST USA: EVALUATION OF CHEMICAL INDUCERS, STAND MANAGEMENT, TREE
CHARACTERISTICS, AND GENETICS
By
Marie Jennifer Lauture
December 2017
Chair: Gary Frank Peter Major: Forest Resources and Conservation
In conifers, oleoresin evolved as a defense mechanism against insects and
microbes. Upon wounding, oleoresin flows to the wound site. Because oleoresin is pure
terpene it has been collected as a non-timber forest product primarily from Pinus
species and is used globally for various products. This research evaluated the potential
of reinvigorating the oleoresin tapping industry in the southeastern United States to be
competitive in the global market. This dissertation analyzed the effects of chemical
inducers, stand management, tree characteristics, and genetics on oleoresin flow and
yield in slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) trees in North Florida, with the goal of
determining the optimal and most sustainable oleoresin collection method for stands
managed for timber production.
The borehole tapping method, which involves drilling a hole into the stem, was
used to collect oleoresin from live trees because of its labor efficiency, oleoresin quality,
and no impact of merchantable timber. In trees between 11 and 22 years, oleoresin
yields averaged 1 to 1.5 kg per tree. Oleoresin yields were positively correlated to DBH
and negatively correlated to tapping intensity; larger diameter trees are preferred.
20
Methyl jasmonate was the best chemical stimulant tested and was most effective
diluted in 90% ethanol at a concentration of 400 mM. When 400 mM of methyl
jasmonate was used we recovered an average of 3.0 kg of oleoresin per tree with a 95-
day collection season. Based on this average yield of oleoresin per tree and automation
we conclude that it is possible to have a sustainable and profitable commercial
operation for oleoresin tapping in the southeastern U.S.
The potential of increasing oleoresin productivity in pines through breeding
programs is high and imperative to meet global demands. The broad-sense heritability
estimates of short-term and long-term oleoresin yield in a 15-year-old slash pine clonal
test were moderate (H2 = 0.22 and H2 = 0.19, respectively) and showed potential for
selecting families with higher oleoresin productivity. Although short-term and long-term
yield were uncorrelated phenotypically, the Type A genetic correlation between them
was strong (r2=0.78), supporting the use of short-term yield to accelerate breeding for
improved oleoresin yields.
21
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Background
In the southern United States, native loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine
(Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) are planted on about 120,000 km2 and 55,000 km2 of land,
respectively (Xiao et al., 2003). These two species are also planted outside of their
native range in various countries primarily for timber harvest. Slash pine is planted in
South Africa, China, Brazil, and various Central American countries for the harvest of
both timber and non-timber forest products (Aguiar et al., 2012; Burns et al., 1990).
Forestland in the southern U.S. is economically valuable and vital to meeting consumer
demands for timber and non-timber forest products both globally and nationally.
Historically, oleoresin was collected for the naval stores industry in the U.S. to
maintain and repair the hulls and rigging of wooden sailing ships (Harrington, 1969).
Pine oleoresin is a key non-timber forest product collected and used globally for various
renewable chemical products and biofuels. Oleoresin evolved in conifers as a
physiochemical defense mechanism against stem boring insects. Oleoresin is found in
several genera of the Pinaceae family, but is collected commercially from thirteen Pinus
species. Within the Pinus genus, the quality and quantity of oleoresin produced varies
by species; however, various external factors, such as climate, water availability, stand
density, fertilization, and tree morphology. can affect the yield potential of a tree. In the
U.S., slash pine is the best candidate species for collection of oleoresin. Furthermore,
the potential for inducing the higher yields of oleoresin within a tree through chemical
and physical treatments is considerable.
22
The objectives of Chapter 2 are to address the role and importance of oleoresin
in conifers, outlines the genetic variation in oleoresin yield and composition, describes
and analyzes the current and potential methods of inducing oleoresin in conifers, and
finally outlines the applicability and economics of oleoresin production.
Problem
Since the 1950s, the widespread use of silvicultural technologies and planting of
improved genotypes of Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) and Pinus elliottii var. elliottii (slash
pine) has increased growth and wood yields by more than four-fold (Fox, 2007).
Continued increases in yield for renewable and sustainable materials, chemicals and
energy source are needed to meet the growing demand from an increasing human
population (Omer, 2008). As climate change is increasing pressure on forest trees to
resist water stress, pests and disease outbreaks, the importance to increase
productivity and resilience of forest stands becomes evident. In conifers, a primary
defense against insect pests like the boring beetles and their associated fungi is the
terpene based oleoresin. Oleoresin is synthesized and stored within primary and
secondary resin canal networks, and is composed of a mixture of monoterpenes and
diterpenoids (da Silva Rodrigues-Corrêa et al., 2013). Wounded pine stems exude
oleoresin, which has been collected from live trees for millennia. The importance of pine
oleoresin in defense against pests and its use as a renewable chemical and potential
biofuel have generated strong interest in better understanding what limits production. It
is known that both pine wood growth, and oleoresin yield and composition, are under
genetic and environmental control (Squillace and Bengtson, 1961; Squillace, 1971;
23
USDA Forest Service 1971a; Hodges, 1995; Jokela, 2004; Zhang et al., 2006;
Westbrook et al., 2013; Rodriguez-Garcia, 2014).
While oleoresin yield is affected by genetic and environmental components, there
is limited knowledge about how they interact to affect yield. Furthermore, the biological,
environmental, or silvicultural factors causing the variability observed in the flow rate
and yield of oleoresin among trees from operational stands is not well understood. We
know there may be some morphological, anatomical and physiochemical characteristics
of trees that affect oleoresin production, but we are lacking knowledge of which primary
factors are limiting in conifers. The heritability of different traits, such as stem diameter
(DBH), tree height, crown size, and oleoresin yield, can help quantify the importance of
genetics and the environment. Additionally, while there is an established market for
these forest products, the potential for maximizing production of oleoresin within a stand
has yet to be met.
The long-term goal of this research is to understand the factors that affect growth
and yield of forest trees, focusing on loblolly and slash pine, and to maximize the
potential production of timber and non-timber resources, specifically oleoresin. This
project has the potential of reviving the once thriving industry of oleoresin collection in
the U.S. While oil prices in the U.S. have decreased significantly over the past couple of
years, it is still crucial to find alternatives that are more sustainable. This study will
provide an assessment of the feasibility for private landowners to produce oleoresin for
renewable chemicals and biofuels. If economically viable, application of this research
will provide a way for landowners to increase their annual income from slash pine
plantations. By analyzing the genetic influence on oleoresin properties, we gain insight
24
on how to manipulate tree breeding and selection to increase resin flow and decrease
variability within individual trees.
Research Objectives
Several study sites were selected for this research in North Florida, primarily in
Alachua, Union, and Bradford Counties. The main objectives of this research are:
1. Maximize collection and recovery of oleoresin and increase terpene synthesis in slash pine for renewable chemicals and biofuel production by testing different chemical stimulants, stand ages, and stand management practices (Chapter 3);
2. Determine the optimal methyl jasmonate dosage and carrier solvent for oleoresin collection in the southeast United States (Chapter 4);
3. Determine the genotypic and phenotypic correlations between 24-hour resin flow with multi-month resin collection (Chapter 5); and
Application of this research will provide a way for landowners to increase their
annual income from slash pine plantations by creating a cost-effective system for tree
induction and collection to supply large quantities of oleoresin from existing plantations
to the pine chemical industry and advancing the biofuels industry in Florida. Analyzing
the phenotypic growth traits and oleoresin production of loblolly and slash pine
backcross hybrids will provide insight on the potential to increase oleoresin yield and
timber production from southern pines, as well as improving genomic selection
techniques that would benefit tree breeding projects.
25
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Introduction to Oleoresin
All conifers naturally produce oleoresin as a defense mechanism to protect trees
against insect pests, microbes, and physical damage. Oleoresin is extracted from a
variety of plant species, however, commercially it is primarily collected from Pinus
species. All Pinus species naturally produce oleoresin, though some species produce
better quality and higher quantities of oleoresin. While oleoresin is collected from live
pine trees in the forest for commercial purposes worldwide, the market is currently
dominated by China, which accounts for 74% of global production, while the second
largest producers are Brazil and Indonesia, each with about 9% of world production
(Aguiar et al., 2012).
Historical Production of Oleoresin
While no longer as relevant in the market, the southern U.S., especially Georgia
and North Florida, historically collected and processed pine terpenes from live trees and
harvested wood in chemical pulp mills. The U.S. naval stores industry began in the mid-
19th century in the Southeast, where pine oleoresin was extracted from live longleaf
(Pinus palustris Mill.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. Var. elliottii) trees by
streaking the bark along the stem and attaching a collection cup (Harrington, 1969;
Sullivan, 2014). Historically, gum oleoresin was collected for use on ships for repairs, to
caulk seams, and protect ropes (Harrington, 1969).
From the early 1900s to around 1970s, the annual production of pine gum
turpentine in the U.S. was about 30 million gallons and the production of gum rosin
averaged about 1 billion gallons (Harrington, 1969). However, according to Harrington
26
(1969), production from pine gum began to decrease in the 1950s and by 1967 it
dropped to 10 percent of total gum production. In 1910, steam distillation led to
increases in turpentine recovery from pine stumps and in 1928 the advent of sulfate
pulping also led to a decrease in turpentine and rosin collected from living trees
(Harrington, 1969).
In the mid-1930s, the industry began to reform the resin tapping technique by
using chemical stimulants to increase production, and modernizing the collection
equipment to be more easily removed and reduce negative effects on tree vigor
(Harrington, 1969). Oleoresin tapping stopped in the southeastern U.S. late last century
due to high labor costs, reductions in older slash pine stands, rising competition from
chemical substitutes, as well as the negative effects of over tapping (Sullivan, 2014).
Furthermore, after World War II, tall oil rosin became more prevalent and collection from
live trees decreased (Harrington, 1969). However, similar techniques are currently being
used around the world to collect pine resin. Currently, timber harvesting in the southeast
U.S. is highly efficient, productive and sustainable (Eisenbies et al., 2009). Additionally,
current research shows that timber harvested for biofuel will not have negative long-
term effects on forest growth (Eisenbies et al., 2009). Reinvigorating the oleoresin
tapping industry in the southern U.S. has the potential to be profitable due to the
increase in productivity of pine plantations, the modernized tapping techniques, as well
as the need to find alternative renewable sources of chemicals and fuels.
Species Used Worldwide of Oleoresin Production
The species used for tapping depends on the geographic region in which
collection takes place, and the availability of high yielding species currently in the
27
region, or capable of being grown in the region. In some countries, China in particular,
the industry relies mostly on natural stands of Pinus massoniana trees for tapping, while
others, such as Brazil, use non-native planted pines like P. elliottii for tapping. According
to Aguiar et al. (2012), the Pinus species and varieties that have high resin yielding
capabilities include: P. elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii, P. elliottii Engelm. var. densa, P.
massoniana Lamb., P. caribaea Morelet var. bahamensis Griseb., P. caribaea Morelet
var. hondurensis Sénécl., P. caribaea Morelet var. caribaea, P. yunnanensis Franch., P.
merkusii Jungh. Et De Vriese, P. oocarpa Schiede ex Schltdl., P. kesiya Royle ex
Gordon, P. pinaster Aiton, P. sylvestris L., P. palustris Mill., P. nigra J. F. Arnold, P.
taeda L., P. roxburghii Sarg., P. wallichiana A. B. Jacks., P. nigra J. F. Arnold
subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe, P. sibirica Du Tour, P. pinea L., P. tropicalis
Morelet, and P. halepensis Mill. While all those species can produce large amounts of
oleoresin, they may not be ideal candidates for tapping because they may lack some
important characteristics to increase the flow of oleoresin, such as low crystallization
rate.
The primary species used today for commercial oleoresin production is P.
massoniana, which is native to south, central and east China as well as other southeast
Asian countries and grows at elevations ranging from a few meters to 2000 meters
(Farjon, 2013a). Though it is a productive species, P. massoniana is not usually planted
outside its native range (Farjon, 2013a); therefore, it would not be suitable for the
oleoresin industry in the United States. The other leading species used for commercial
tapping outside of China include P. elliottii var. elliottii, P. caribaea, P. pinaster, and P.
sylvestris (Aguiar et al., 2012). The overall highest yielding oleoresin species is P.
28
elliottii var. elliottii which is native to the southeastern U.S., primarily Florida and
Georgia, and is planted outside of its native range in South Africa, China, Brazil, and
Central America, for the harvest of both timber and non-timber forest products (Aguiar
et al., 2012; Burns et al., 1990). P. caribaea is a species native to Central America and
the Caribbean and is also planted for oleoresin and timber production in South America
(Aguiar et al., 2012; Farjon, 2013b). P. caribaea includes three major varieties
(bahamensis, hondurensis, and caribaea), some of which are more exploited than
others (Farjon, 2013b). To build an oleoresin industry P. elliottii var. elliottii is the ideal
candidate species because of its ability to be planted in a variety of geographic
locations, improved genetics, and high overall productivity. Among the biggest threats to
P. elliottii var. elliottii are bark boring beetles, however, this threat exists only in its
native range (Roberds et al. 2003; Strom et al. 2002).
Oleoresin Composition
The turpentine in oleoresin consists of monoterpene, which includes α and β-
pinene (Rodrigues et al., 2011; da Silva Rodrigues-Corrêa et al., 2013; Rodrigues and
Fett-Neto, 2009). The rosin in oleoresin consists of diterpenoids, which seal wounds
made by boring bark beetles or other predators (Rodrigues and Fett-Neto, 2009;
Rodrigues et al., 2011; da Silva Rodrigues-Corrêa et al., 2013). Oleoresins produced in
traumatic resin ducts tend to include other substances such as phenolics (Nagy et al.,
2000). The oleoresin in conifers is synthesized in resin canals, a specialized tissue that
forms an interconnected network in needles and wood. In resin canals, live epithelial
cells constitutively synthesize oleoresin and secrete it into the luminal space of the
canal (Steele et al., 1995).
29
Normal resin canals occur naturally in conifers; however, when the tree
undergoes significant stress, like wounding or an attack from pests, they develop
traumatic resin canals (Nagy et al., 2000; Lin et al., 2002). Both types of resin canals
are surrounded by epithelial and parenchyma cells (Nagy et al., 2000; Lin et al., 2002).
The structure of normal resin canals is typically a single layer of cells and tubular, while
traumatic resin canals are round and come in one or two rows of cells (Nagy et al. 2000;
Lin et al. 2002). These canals, depending on species and genera, may be found in the
xylem, phloem, roots, stem, leaves, and seeds (Lin et al., 2002). Within the xylem and
phloem of most conifer species, normal resin canals are divided into the vertical (axial)
and horizontal (radial) canals (Lin et al., 2002). Generally, axial resin canals are found in
the secondary xylem of conifers often formed as traumatic ducts (Nagy et al., 2000).
The axial resin canals in the xylem can be divided into canals with thin walls
surrounding the epithelial cells, which only occur in Pinus species, or canals with thick
walls surrounding the epithelial cells, which are found in almost all other genera (Lin et
al., 2002). Resin canal length can vary greatly between and within species and
individual trees (Lapasha and Wheeler, 1990). In Pinus taeda, longitudinal resin canal
lengths ranged from an average of 57 mm to 122 mm for 10-year-old trees, and 74 mm
to 167 mm for 20-year-old trees (Lapasha and Wheeler, 1990). LaPasha and Wheeler
(1990) also reported resin canal lengths of other conifer species of varying ages and
found an average length of 75 mm for 15-year-old P. contorta, 185 mm for 16-year old
P. monticola, 59 mm for 20-year-old P. ponderosa, and 207 mm and 498 mm for 10 and
20-year-old P. elliottii trees, respectively. These differences in lengths of resin canals
have a significant impact on the yield and ability to extract oleoresin from the tree. Thus,
30
noting these differences gives insight on which species is a better candidate for
commercial oleoresin production.
Oleoresin and Insect Pests
Coevolution of Oleoresin and Insect Pests
Forest trees are long lived species and coevolved with their pests and
pathogens. Bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) including mountain pine beetle
(Dendroctonus ponderosae) and southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis) are
responsible for the death of billions of conifer trees worldwide (Ferrenberg et al., 2014).
To defend against insect pests, conifers evolved chemical defenses in oleoresin and
resin canals. Oleoresin is released upon wounding and the sticky monoterpene and
diterpenoid resin repels, weakens and can kill insects and their associated fungi (Raffa
et al., 2005; Ferrenberg et al., 2014). Terpenes are polymers of the five carbon (C)
isopentenyl pyrophosphate, and are the largest and most diverse group of secondary
products and have important roles in chemical defenses of plants (Rodrigues-Corrêa et
al., 2012).
While many insect pests have the ability to kill off entire forest stands, conifers
have successfully persisted in part due to their highly evolved chemical defense
mechanism (Phillips and Croteau, 1999). Oleoresin is composed of C10 monoterpenes
and C15 sesquiterpenes which constitute the turpentine fraction that also contains
toxins, like limonene and 3-carene responsible for fighting off insects and other pests,
and C20 diterpenoids (Phillips and Croteau, 1999; Bohlmann and Keeling, 2008;
Rodrigues-Corrêa, 2012). Understanding the relationship between oleoresin production
in trees for defense and insect infestation is crucial to determine how yield and flow of
31
oleoresin can be increased. These relationships can give insight as to what factors are
most important to control oleoresin flow and what can be manipulated to increase
overall production. Furthermore, if changes in global climate change increases or
worsens bark beetle infestations, it is important to recognize how to increase terpene
production to mitigate the potential negative impacts.
Host Selection and Colonization Behavior of Insect Pests
Conifers have adapted to bark beetle attacks; similarly bark beetles have
adapted their strategies for successfully locating, colonizing, and killing host trees
(Wood, 1982). There are many ecological factors that play a role in determining which
insect pests colonize living or recently dead trees, what parts of the trees get attacked,
as well as physiological characteristics of the host trees that make it easier or more
difficult for colonization, such as oleoresin characteristics. According to Wood (1982),
certain insect pests strictly colonize healthy trees, while others prey on trees in poorer
health due to environmental stressors. Smaller and lateral buds are preferable for
selection by bark beetles because they do not produce enough oleoresin to kill the
larvae (Harris, 1960).
In turn, bark beetles have adapted to tree defenses, enabling colonization. First,
bark beetles work in large numbers, making their joint attacks more exhaustive to the
tree (Raffa et al., 2005). Furthermore, bark beetles use pheromones from oxygenated
terpenes, which are synthesized from metabolized host compounds to increase their
aggression (Raffa et al., 2005). Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) larvae remove small
amounts of resin from their bodies with their mouths and their vomitus (Harris, 1960).
On the other hand, when flooded with larger amounts of resin the R. buoliana larvae
32
either abandon the tree or are drowned in the resin, and thus are incapable of doing too
much damage (Harris, 1960).
Pest species have been successful at colonizing conifer host trees by evolving to
produce aggregation pheromones, which allow pests to communicate with one another
and facilitates mating, host finding and resource utilization (Raffa et al., 1993). Some
species also use aggregation pheromones to attract other beetles from the same
species to their host tree, which allow the group of beetles to kill the host tree by virtue
of strength in numbers (Raffa et al., 1993). Bark beetles may synthesize their
aggregation pheromones from compounds taken from the host tree; for example,
ipsedienol is synthesized from myrcene and verbenone is derived from α-pinene (Raffa
et al., 1993).
Wood (1982) described in detail the process of colonizing a host tree by beetles.
This process begins with dispersal when young beetles emerge from a host tree and
either fly out (long or short distance) or stay in the vicinity of the host tree due to
attractive pheromones (Wood, 1982). This phase is followed by selection of a new host
tree by the pests. Certain beetles may be attracted to volatile compounds that are
released by a tree that is stressed, while others are incapable of detecting prime host
trees prior to landing (Wood, 1982). The time it takes for the tree to be colonized after
this phase depends on how quickly pheromones are produced and how weakened the
host tree is already (Wood, 1982) . Once a beetle selects and establishes itself in the
host tree they begin feeding and release pheromones in order to attract more beetles,
both male and female, which marks the initiation of the concentration phase (Wood,
1982). There is a negative correlation between the time between selection and
33
pheromone release and the survival and success of the bark beetle population; with
shorter elapsed time giving greater success (Wood, 1982). The final phase of colonizing
a tree is termination (Wood, 1982). Proper termination is crucial for the survival of the
bark beetle population because if not executed properly, the population runs the risk of
exceeding its carrying capacity and deteriorating its resources (Wood, 1982). In some
cases, the presence of both male and female beetles decreases the attraction of new
beetles to come to the host tree, because certain males release chemicals that alters
the responses to pheromones, which limits reproduction and keeps the population at a
sustainable level (Wood, 1982). Furthermore, during this phase, some beetles may
jump to adjacent trees and begin establishing themselves and releasing pheromones
(Wood, 1982).
Once dispersal and selection have occurred, and the concentration phase has
begun, the beetles on the host tree begin to bore through the cambial tissue and create
galleries within the tree for reproduction (Phillips and Croteau, 1999). Once the adults
have laid their eggs, they bore through the tree creating exit holes and disperse
elsewhere beginning a new colonization process (Phillips and Croteau, 1999). When
bark beetles attack conifers, their associated fungi are also inoculated, providing access
to host tree carbohydrates (Phillips and Croteau, 1999). Furthermore, these fungi
produce toxins that play a large role in killing the host tree (Phillips and Croteau, 1999).
After the oleoresin reaches the site of wounding, the exposure to the atmosphere
causes it to crystallize and harden, which seals the wound (Phillips and Croteau, 1999).
Most destructive conifer pests, such as bark beetles, only attack live trees and work in
34
groups in order to kill their host tree to successfully reproduce (Phillips and Croteau,
1999).
Conifer Defenses Against Insect Pests
Southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis) is a destructive native pest that
attacks and kills pine stands in the southeastern U.S. during major outbreaks, especially
P. taeda L. stands (Roberds et al., 2003; Strom et al., 2002). These pine forests use
oleoresin to defend themselves against southern pine beetles as it entraps the attacking
beetles, which prevent them from establishing galleries, and it delivers toxic compounds
to the insect (Roberds et al., 2003). The most important toxic chemicals in oleoresin for
pine tree resistance to insect pests, such as bark beetles, are α-pinene, which works
against the pheromones of D. frontalis, and limonene, which helps increase the tree’s
resistance (Hodges et al., 1979; Strom et al., 2002). The abundance of these two
chemicals, however, are not correlated to tree size including crown dimensions, DBH
and height (Strom et al., 2002).
Individual trees and species differ in their reactions to a pest attack, such as bark
beetles; however, in most cases the concentration of monoterpenes in the tissue
surrounding the entry site increases by a few hundred-fold within a couple weeks (Raffa
et al., 2005; Figure 2-1). Similarly, the percent mortality of pests increases in a
logarithmic fashion because of synthesis of terpenes by the tree (Raffa et al., 2005).
Diterpenoids, on the other hand, do not play a significant role in fighting against boring
bark beetles, but they do fight against fungi (Raffa et al., 2005). Many factors help
increase resistance to insect attacks on conifers; some of which are only successful in
certain species. For example, bark beetle resistance in lodgepole and limber pine,
35
Ferrenberg et al. (2014) found that resistant trees, compared to susceptible trees, had
more resin ducts within the recent 5 to 10 years of tissue growth. This likely increased
resin production and flow, which helped fight against an attack (Ferrenberg et al., 2014).
The density and size of resin ducts was significantly greater in resistant P. flexilis
compared with susceptible trees. In contrast, no significant difference was observed in
P. contorta, between resistant and non-resistant trees (Ferrenberg et al., 2014). In both
P. contorta and P. flexilis, radial tree growth was positively correlated with the quantity
of resin ducts (Ferrenberg et al., 2014). Oleoresin flow has identified trees that are
resistant to southern pine beetle in P. taeda and P. echinata (Hodges et al., 1979).
Phenolics also play a role in bark beetle resistance in certain conifers, such as,
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) (Faccoli and
Schlyter, 2007). Phenolic compounds increase tree resistance to bark beetles by
reducing the host acceptance and feeding of insects (Faccoli and Schylter, 2007; Figure
2-1). Parenchyma cells in the secondary phloem play a vital role in the constitutive and
inducible defense responses against invasive insects in Norway spruce (Franceschi et
al., 1998; Franceschi et al., 2000). However, due to the coevolution of trees and insects
with their associated fungi, some tree phenolic compounds are not as successful as
non-host compounds to deter insect tunneling of Ips typographus on P. abies Karst.
(Faccoli and Schylter, 2007).
Climate Change and Pine Beetles
It is evident that climate change is occurring, and increases in the amounts of
greenhouse gas emissions by humans are directly and indirectly causing a variety of
issues - including sea level rise, increases in atmospheric temperature, and extreme
36
weather events (IPCC, 2014). These issues can in turn cause a shift in vegetation type,
land use changes, and increase in insect infestations (USGCRP, 2009 and USGCRP,
2014). Climate change can impact conifer forests and bark beetle population dynamics
both directly and indirectly. Climate change can alter tree defense and tolerance of
insect pests, insect physiology, distribution, and abundance, as well as interactions
between abiotic and biotic disturbance agents (Weed et al., 2013).
Pine beetle outbreaks are heavily influenced by climate (Gan, 2004; Bentz et al.,
2010; McNulty et al., 2013). Temperature has a strong influence on population
dynamics and developmental processes of bark beetles (Bentz et al., 2010). Beetles
have become more tolerant to colder temperatures, but there is still significant mortality
due to cold (Bentz et al., 2010). However, with climate change, cold-induced mortality
would be reduced. Temperature increases during the spring and winter are predicted to
promote pine beetle outbreaks, while warmer fall temperatures would reduce beetle
outbreaks (Gan, 2004). Furthermore, warmer winters may promote the overwintering of
beetles which could lead to more severe outbreaks and infestations the following spring
(Gan, 2004). During the 21st century, average global temperatures are predicted to
increase 1.8 to 4.0 degrees Celsius because of an increase in atmospheric CO2 levels
(Bentz et al., 2010). If atmospheric CO2 levels double to about 750 parts per million,
southern pine beetle infestation risks in the U.S. is predicted to increase by 2.5 to 5
times (Gan, 2004).
Climate change is a concern, especially to forest landowners, because as the
global temperatures continue to increase, there is a high risk that conifer forests,
especially planted forest with faster growth rates, will be damaged by increases in pine
37
beetle outbreaks. In the southern U.S. about $1.5 billion worth of timber from 1970 to
1996 were lost as a result of southern pine beetle infestations (Gan, 2004; USGCRP,
2009). With climate change, beetles in the southern U.S. and Central America will have
the potential to move north following increasing temperatures (Bentz et al., 2010; Gillis,
2013). This could be quite detrimental, as the beetles with current ranges limited to the
south could infest northern forests and increase the risks of damage. For example, in
New Jersey, the southern pine beetle has already infested and killed thousands of acres
of pineland due to the warmer winters (Gillis, 2013). While the case in New Jersey was
confined to a small area, and in the northwest U.S. and Canada, tens of millions of
acres of forests have already been destroyed by mountain pine beetle outbreaks made
possible by the warming of those areas, highlighting the severity of the threat (Bentz et
al., 2010; Gillis, 2013). Furthermore, elevated CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere will
indirectly affect the interactions of bark beetles and conifers (Bentz et al., 2010).
Increasing CO2 concentrations increases the ratio between carbon and nitrogen, which
would decrease the number of nutrients available for bark beetle, causing insects to
feed more heavily on conifers (Bentz et al., 2010).
Genetic Variation in Oleoresin
Variation of Oleoresin Composition Among Species
The chemical composition of oleoresin differs among pine species and
geographical ranges (Rezzi et al., 2005). The main constituents found in the oleoresin
of Pinus nigra at various concentrations include abietic acid, dehydroabietic acid,
distillation process used to obtain gum turpentine and gum rosin. Rosin and turpentine
are further processed into a variety of different chemical products (Rezzi, 2005). After
the distillation process, 1000 tonnes of raw resin collected in one year will yield about
650 to 700 tonnes of rosin and 150 tonnes of turpentine (Coppen, 1995).
Economics of Oleoresin Production
Non-Timber Forest Products
Non-timber forest products (NTFP) are harvested around the world in both
natural and plantation forests, and are an important income source for millions of
people, especially indigenous populations (Ticktin, 2004; Stanley et al., 2012). NTFP
range from medicinal products to aromatic resins, oleoresin, pine straw, fruit, rubber,
etc. The main advantage of NTFP is that if the demand for these products is high, the
deforestation and land use changes will decrease. However, in developing countries
people may become dependent on forest resources for economic security, which may
be problematic in the long run (Stanley et al., 2012). Though presently, out of 71 NTFP
studies sampled, over two-thirds of NTFP researched met the threshold for economic
sustainability (Stanley et al., 2012). In tropical rainforests, for example the Brazilian
Amazon, Brazil nut and natural rubber were NTFP historically important to people living
85
in the forest and were promoted as an incentive to protect the native ecosystem
(Belcher and Schreckenberg, 2007).
In industrialized countries, like the U.S., NTFP are collected primarily in
plantations. Landowners in the Southeast U.S. actively manage their pine plantations
(loblolly, P. palustris, and slash) for pine straw as well as timber production (Dickens et
al., 2011). In intensively managed plantations, landowners can make an income, even if
they are absent, for about 5 to 10 years prior to final timber harvest and increase their
total net revenue from the stand (Dickens et al., 2011). In Georgia, the economic benefit
of pine straw raking was close to $81 million in 2009 (Dickens et al., 2011). Pine straw
collection is a wonderful NTFP for both small and large landowners. Management
strategies that benefit pine straw collection, such as fertilization and weed control, is
also beneficial to timber harvest, as it increases the overall production of the stand,
making it more economically profitable (Duryea, 1989; Dickens et al., 2011).
Oleoresin is one of the oldest NTFP, is renewable, and has undergone significant
improvement in collection methods (Tadesse et al., 2001). Economically, re-adding
NTFP to the forest management portfolio in the U.S. would be very beneficial and
oleoresin production can easily be included. However, excessive resin tapping,
especially using the traditional method of streaking or chipping the bark, may cause tree
mortality (Stanley et al., 2012; Susaeta et al., 2014). Formerly, the U.S. was the world’s
leading producer of oleoresin, with 50% of production, though that title now belongs to
China (Tadesse et al., 2001). With modern techniques of tapping that are less
damaging to trees, combined with the increase in tree productivity for resin and timber
86
due to breeding, selection, and intensive management, the U.S. can get back into the
market and potentially return to being the leading producer of oleoresin.
Oleoresin Tapping and Timber Production
Pine oleoresin is an important NTFP collected and used around the world to
increase the economic value of the forest. To be more economically viable, it is
important to be able to collect oleoresin from live pine trees while still being able to
harvest the timber from that same stand. Wang et al. (2006) reported an increase in the
optimal rotation age of their Simao pine plantation in China from oleoresin tapping. This
occurs because trees produce more oleoresin as they increase in age (Wang et al.,
2006). However, in the U.S., with slash pine, the optimal rotation age did not increase
due to tapping (Susaeta et al., 2014).
With all else equal, a plantation that includes resin tapping and timber production
in the management portfolio is more profitable than one with only timber production, as
long as the site index is greater than 12 (Wang et al., 2006). The net present value of a
resin and timber plantation is higher compared to timber plantations, and is also
profitable in cases when only timber is not, such as interest rates of 12% (Wang et al.,
2006). Furthermore, adding oleoresin tapping to a timber stand is most beneficial when
the discount rate is low (Wang et al., 2006). Including oleoresin with timber production
was found to increase the land expectation value (LEV) by 20.5-42.7% (Susaeta et al.,
2014). The intensity of resin tapping must also be considered. If stands are tapped at
higher intensity rates there is the potential of negatively affecting growth of trees, which
would diminish the profits from timber harvest while increasing those from resin
87
collection (Wang et al., 2006). However, with management and control of tapping, this
added commodity can be lucrative without damaging forest ecosystems.
Global Supply and Demand
Market requirements
A small processing plant that produces 1,000 tonnes annually would need resin
tapped from about 330,000 mature pines if annual production is 3 kg per tree (Coppen
and Hone, 1995). Oleoresin quality is important when selling in the international market
(Coppen, 1995). In general, higher levels of beta-pinene, at least 30%, are preferable,
and total pinene content above 90% is considered good quality (Coppen, 1995). The
presence of certain compounds like 3-carene would lower the quality of resin (Coppen,
1995).
Global production
Production of oleoresin globally averages at about 1,100,000 metric tonnes
annually, and in 2008 China produced 849,205 tonnes (Rodrigues-Corrêa et al., 2012;
Susaeta et al., 2014; FAO, 2014). Between 2006 and 2007, Brazil produced about
106,000 tonnes of oleoresin primarily from P. elliottii (Rodrigues et al., 2008). Since
2000, Chinese exports of rosin, resin acids and resin derivatives have steadily
increased from about 181.68 million U.S. Dollars (USD) in 2000 to about 551.85 million
USD in 2014 (World Trade Atlas, 2016). The quantity of rosin and resin acids and
derivatives exported by China has fluctuated from around 335,642 metric tons in 2000,
to around 503,273 metric tons in 2007, and then steadily decreased to about 208,744
metric tons in 2014 (World Trade Atlas, 2016). While the quantity of resin being
exported by China has decreased over the years, the value of resin has increased. The
88
average price of rosin and resin in 2000 was about 0.54 USD per kilogram compared to
the current average price of 2.64 USD per kg (World Trade Atlas, 2016). Since China
uses the bark streak method of tapping with an open collection system, the resin
collected by China is of lower quality to the oleoresin that could be produced in the U.S.
through the closed system of the borehole tapping method proposed. Therefore, the
value of U.S. oleoresin would potentially be higher and thus could be sold at a higher
price compared to China.
Over the past 1.5 decades, the U.S. has steadily imported about 30 million USD
to 83 million USD, with a peak of 119 million USD, worth of rosin and resin acids and
derivatives annually (United States Census Bureau, 2016). This equates to about
30,000 to 57,000 metric tons of rosin and resin acids and derivatives annually (United
States Census Bureau, 2016). Furthermore, the U.S. has also imported between 5 to 11
million USD worth of turpentine and pine oil annually, while importing 21.85 and 20.78
million USD of this commodity in 2011 and 2012, respectively (United States Census
Bureau, 2016). The U.S. imported between 6.5 to 14.5 metric tons annually of
turpentine and pine oil between 2000 and 2014; with the recent few years seeing a
reduction in imports from over 12 metric tons in 2012 to 6.5 and 8.6 metric tons in 2013
and 2014, respectively (United States Census Bureau, 2016). The average price of
turpentine oil has increased over the years from 0.29 USD/kg in 2000 to 1.14 USD/kg in
2014; pine oil prices have also increased from 1.04 USD/kg in 2000 to 1.54 USD/kg in
2006 (United States Census Bureau, 2016). The U.S. spends a significant amount of
money on importing these commodities which could be sourced domestically.
Reinvigorating the oleoresin industry in this country to supply the pine chemical
89
companies, would allow the U.S. to reduce their imports, and also potentially increase
their exports, while supplying jobs to many Americans.
What Drives the Production Cost?
Labor
The different methods of oleoresin tapping require different organization and
labor (Coppen and Hone, 1995). When using the bark streaking methods such as the
Chinese, American and French, the resin tapper must visit the tree more frequently
throughout the season. Under the Chinese method, because no chemical stimulant is
used, the resin tapper must visit the tree approximately every one to three days
(Coppen and Hone, 1995). This would mean more working hours and thus more pay for
the worker per season. However, the countries that typically use this method have lower
labor costs, like China compared to the U.S. The American and French methods require
a visit to the tree every 1 to 2 weeks, which lowers the number of total working hours
per laborer but can still be costly depending on minimum wage levels (Coppen and
Hone, 1995). The borehole method is the most cost-effective method in terms of labor
because the resin tapper only needs to revisit the tree twice in one season, though
tapping takes more time per tree (Hodges, 1995). Cunningham presented the average
wage per hour for resin tappers in Brazil, Argentina, Spain and China as well as the
labor cost per ton based on the quantity of oleoresin collected by each worker
(Cunningham, 2014; Table 2-2). Developing countries have much cheaper labor
compared to developed countries, and thus are able to produce more (Cunningham,
2014; Table 2-2). However, the average resin produced per laborer in China compared
90
to Brazil and Argentina show the importance of investing in better, more sustainable
tapping techniques regardless of cost of labor (Cunningham, 2014; Table 2-2).
When using the bark streaking methods, prior to the beginning of the tapping
season, additional labor is required to prepare the stand by shaving the trees and
installing collection vessels (Coppen and Hone, 1995). Furthermore, at the end of the
season, labor is required to clean-up and collect all the vessels (Coppen and Hone,
1995). As an incentive to be more productive and work more efficiently, some
companies pay their laborers based on how much resin they collect, or establish
systems in order to reward people who collect more with bonuses, and penalize those
that do not produce as much (Coppen and Hone, 1995). In some countries, laborers do
not work with a company and are allocated a certain number of trees, and can then
decide whether or not they want to hire help using their own finances (Coppen and
Hone, 1995). In the U.S., both small landowners and large companies could enter the
resin collection business. Since the minimum wage in the U.S. is higher than in many
developing countries, resin tappers would have more of an incentive to work even if it
requires hard labor. A tapping method requiring an individual to re-visit the tree multiple
times within one season would not be cost effective in this country, because of the
higher labor cost, which is why borehole tapping appears to be the best method for this
country.
Equipment
The following is a list of equipment that is required to complete resin tapping
following the bark streaking methods (Coppen and Hone, 1995).
• Tool to shave off the bark
• Bark hack to remove bark
91
• Collection vessel
• Material to make gutters
• Support nail for the gutters
• Hammer or mallet
• Sharpening tool for bark hack
• Chemical stimulant
• Bottle or container to hold and apply stimulant
• Bucket to empty resin from collection vessel
• Barrel or drum to collect and transport resin
• Protective equipment for resin tappers
Similarly, the following is a list required to collect oleoresin using the manual borehole
tapping method.
• Boring auger drill bit (2.54 cm or bigger)
• Gasoline powered drill
• Sharpening tool for drill bit
• Gasoline tank
• Gasoline and 2-cycle engine oil
• PVC pipe fitting
• Mallet
• Polyethylene collection bags
• Cable ties to attach bags to fittings
• Spray bottle to hold and apply stimulant
• Chemical stimulant
• Wire hooks to drain oleoresin from bags to barrels
• Barrel or drum to collect and transport resin
• Protective equipment for resin tappers Cost Compared to other Biofuels
Feedstock costs of pine terpenes for biofuels compared to other sources
including sugarcane, soybeans, and corn, is much lower at around $25 versus around
$200 per barrel of oil equivalent (Peter, 2013). Also, this cost has remained fairly stable
over the past 10 years, whereas other feedstock costs have fluctuated tremendously
(Peter, 2013). The lower feedstock costs are advantageous because it increases the
profitability of the biofuel. However, the cost of establishing agricultural plantations is
92
much lower than that of establishing pine plantations. Frederick et al. (2008a) reported
that ethanol from lignocellulosic loblolly pine can be produced at about $1.53 per gallon
if 75% of the carbohydrates in the wood can be converted to sugars for ethanol. This
cost can be reduced if conversion technology is improved and 95% of carbohydrates
can be converted (Frederick et al. 2008a). In addition to this, other co-products, such as
tall oil and acetic acid can be recovered for additional profits while processing loblolly
carbohydrates for ethanol (Frederick et al. 2008b). This particular cost analysis is based
on pine terpene collected from dead trees and not the oleoresin collected from live
trees.
Another advantage to using pine terpenes as feedstock for biofuels is that
production is scalable due to the large available land area and stable $3-billion-dollar
market that is already established (Peter, 2013). Pine terpenes consist of many different
compounds that can be used to replace or add into petroleum products (Peter, 2013).
However, the ethanol cost of sugarcane feedstock produced in Brazil is about $0.81
versus, $2.89 for European sugar beet, $1.03 for U.S. corn, and $2.12 for U.S. slash
pine terpenes (Goldemberg, 2007; Nesbit, 2008). While pine terpenes are more
expensive, they are still competitive and with improvements in genetics and technology,
they have the potential to become more cost effective. The market for pine terpenes is
already established; in 2010 the U.S. spent $940.8 million buying this product
internationally and produced $1.92 billion (Peter, 2013). This means using southern
pine plantations in the U.S. for pine terpene production could provide products not only
for biofuels but also for the pine chemicals industry.
93
Besides the economic costs of agricultural crops as biofuels, there can be a
detrimental environmental cost. While biofuels can work to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions by sequestering carbon through growth, it can also increase emissions from
land use changes (Searchinger et al., 2008). Increasing biofuel production from
agricultural crops such as corn, switchgrass, or sugarcane could promote the
conversion of forestland to cropland by farmers (Searchinger et al., 2008). Depending
on the types of land-use changes, biofuels from corn can double emissions while
biofuels from switchgrass has the potential to increase emissions by 50% (Searchinger
et al., 2008). In Brazil, the expansion of agricultural land was reported to lead to
deforestation in the amazon and averaged about two times the size of land cleared
cattle production (Morton et al., 2006). While the production of agricultural crops for
biofuel, animal feed, and human consumption can be improved through more intensive
and efficient agricultural practices, as the demand increases, more forestland will be
cleared to meet consumption needs. On the other hand, if pine terpenes are used for
biofuel production, there will not be as much of a need for land-use changes because of
the already established productive pine plantations, but if there are changing land-use
from cropland or pastureland to forests would reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
94
Table 2-1. Average annual oleoresin yield in different regions from various pine species using different tapping methods. A minimum of 2 kg per tree annually is necessary to be economically viable for commercial production. Data retrieved from Hodges 1995, Tadesse et al. 2001, Rodrigues et al. 2011, Cunningham 2012, and Rodríguez-García et al. 2014, Hadiyane et al. 2015.
Country Tree Species Tapping Technique Average Oleoresin Yield (kg/tree/yr)
Spain P. pinaster American 2.39-3.8 United States P. elliottii Borehole 1.8
Brazil P. elliottii American 2.1-6.0 China P. massoniana Chinese 2.0
Indonesia P. merskusii French 2.32
95
Table 2-2. Average cost of oleoresin tapping operation in various countries based on hourly wage and quantity of oleoresin collected per resin tapper. Cost is based on United States dollar. Data retrieved from Cunningham 2014.
Country Average Wage (USD/Hour)
Average Resin per Worker (ton)
Average Labor Cost (USD/ton)
Spain 10.34 18.2 1170 Argentina 3.34 14.4 477
Brazil 4.52 32.3 288 China 3.70 3.5 2060
96
Figure 2-1. Processes of that lead to successful beetle colonization and conifer
defenses with interfering processes used by each organism to prevent the other’s success. Adapted from Wood 1982, Raffa et al. 1993, Phillips and Croteau 1999, Raffa et al. 2005, Faccoli and Schlyter 2007.
97
Figure 2-2. Diagrams of borehole tapping designs. A) Standard boreholes drilled
manually with a gas-powered drill. B) Standard boreholes drilled manually on opposite sides of the tree. C) Boreholes drilled using a tractor mounted automated system, (d) borehole drilled manually with two shallower wide holes and two longer holes drilled with a 0.9525 cm drill bit. E) Six boreholes drilled manually in two levels, the black-marked holes drilled at the base and the grey-marked holes drilled 10.16 cm higher. F) Eight boreholes drilled manually in two levels, the black-marked holes drilled at the base and the grey-marked holes drilled 10.16 cm higher. G) Three borehole system drilled manually with one central borehole and two interior boreholes. All boreholes were drilled using a 2.54 cm drill bit; apart from the longer borehole in D which was drilled using a 0.9525 cm drill bit, the central borehole in the automated system (B) which was drilled with a 3.175 cm bit and the boreholes in the triple borehole experiment (G) which had a counterbore drilled with a 3.175 cm bit and a 2.54 cm drill bit.
98
Figure 2-3. Oleoresin distillation process adapted from Coppen 1995.
99
CHAPTER 3 ASSESSING EFFECTS OF STAND MANAGEMENT, TREE CHARACTERISTICS,
AND CHEMICAL STIMULANT ON OLEORESIN PRODUCTION
Introduction
In the United States, the naval stores industry began in the mid-19th century with
the extraction of pine oleoresin from longleaf (Pinus palustris Mill.) and slash pine
(Pinus elliottii Engelm. Var. elliottii) trees (Harrington, 1969; Sullivan, 2014). In the U.S.,
oleoresin collection from live trees, stopped in the 1980’s and is principally recovered in
chemical pulp mills processing pine pulpwood (Harrington, 1969; American Chemistry
Council, 2011). Today, oleoresin is harvested from live pine trees in countries like China
and Brazil to supply the pine chemical industry. Natural stands of Pinus massoniana
Lamb. and planted stands of slash pine are primarily used for tapping (Aguiar et al.,
2012). Raw oleoresin is an important pine product as it is processed into various
commercial products such as medicine, paint, fragrances, flavoring, and cleaning
agents (Coppen, 1995; Coppen and Hone, 1995). In addition, pine terpenes can be
used for biofuel, providing an alternative to petroleum (Barranx et al., 2002).
Oleoresin is a naturally produced by all conifers as a defense against pests and
any physical damage. Oleoresin production can be induced in various ways; by using
chemical inducers, by physical tapping, and by many environmental factors, such as
fire, fertilization, water availability, and climate (see Chapter 2). While there are several
tapping techniques used to collect oleoresin from live pine trees (see Chapter 2), for a
commercial operation, the primary method for increasing the production of and
collecting oleoresin from live pine trees is by wounding and applying a chemical
stimulant (Hodges, 1995; Martin et al., 2003; Rodrigues et al., 2008). The primary
100
method of wounding used globally involves streaking the bark several times during a
tapping season, as frequent as every day to every two weeks. This method, however, is
not suitable for the U.S. because of higher labor costs. This study used the borehole
tapping method, which involves drilling holes into the base of the tree (Hodges, 1995;
Hodges, 2000; Hadiyane et al., 2015).
With multiple tapping techniques, chemical inducers are applied to increase
yields (Hodges, 1995; Martin et al., 2003; Hudgins et al., 2004; Hudgins and
Franceschi, 2004, Huber et al., 2005; Rodrigues et al., 2008). As discussed in Chapter
2, methyl jasmonate and ethylene releasing compounds are the two most used
stimulants for oleoresin production. Here, we compare the oleoresin yield of trees
treated with these two chemical stimulants as well as a combination of inducers. The
working hypothesis is that when applied to a wound site on the slash pine stem,
chemical stimulants promote the flow of oleoresin towards the wound, stimulate the
formation of new resin canals, and increase overall capacity of tree to synthesize and
release oleoresin.
Tree diameter at breast height (DBH), height and crown size were reported to
have a significant positive effect on oleoresin yield in certain studies (Tadesse et al.,
200; Novick et al., 2012), but not all of these factors had significant effects in other
studies (Gansel, 1965; Lekha, 2002). The hypothesis is that trees with larger DBH more
leaf area have greater xylem tissue growth, which allows for formation of new resin
canals and terpene synthesis. In the southeastern U.S., the best way to accelerate
planted pine tree growth is to use various silvicultural practices, including thinning,
fertilization, and weed control. All the stands sampled in this study were managed using
101
conventional silvicultural practices, including fertilization and herbicide application. Here,
we compare the oleoresin yields of stands of differing ages and thinning regimes, while
also comparing yields of individual trees based on tree size. We hypothesize that slash
pine trees grown in more intensely managed stands will produce more oleoresin when
tapped then those with less management, because more photosynthate can be
allocated to growth and oleoresin production. Since oleoresin production is maximized
when trees are tapped during the summer months (Lorio, 1986; Gaylord et al., 2007;
Davis et al., 2011), oleoresin tapping for this study occurred in the summer, except for
the 2013 tapping season which began in early fall.
The objectives of this study were 1) to compare oleoresin yield in slash pine
under different silvicultural management scenarios and with various chemical
stimulants, and 2) to determine the influence of tree characteristics, including age, DBH,
height, and crown volume on the yield of oleoresin.
Methods
Study Areas
Planted slash pine (P. elliottii) trees between the ages of 11 and 23 years were
selected from privately owned and managed stands in Alachua, Bradford, and Union
counties in Florida, U.S. The forestry companies that provided land for this study
included: Rayonier, Roberts Land & Timber Investment Corp., and Weyerhaeuser
(formerly Plum Creek Timber Company). Throughout the study, 10 stands were
selected, some of which were used for consecutive years. All stands were managed
using similar conventional silvicultural practices such as bedding, fertilization, weed
control and contained open pollinated seedlings from genetically improved slash pine
102
seed orchards. The criteria used to select stands for tapping included: not easily
accessed by the public, sufficient number of live trees available to tap, appropriate age,
and thinned/unthinned management. Within a stand, trees with prominent physical signs
and symptoms of diseases such as fusiform rust (Cronartium fusiforme Hedgcock &
glabra (L.)), and greenbriers (Smilax L. spp.), among others.
Borehole Tapping and In-Tree Injection
The borehole tapping method was used to collect oleoresin from living slash pine
trees (Hodges; 1995). This method involves drilling a hole into the xylem of a tree and
attaching a bag for long-term collection. In the standard tapping method, two boreholes
are drilled parallel to one another at the base of the tree using a Stihl BT45 gasoline
powered drill at about 1000 rpm. The boreholes were drilled to a depth of 10 cm, 2.54
cm in diameter, and approximately 10 cm apart from one another (Figure 2-2). The
holes were drilled at a slight upward angle to facilitate the oleoresin flow downward into
104
the collection bag. An Irwin auger bit 2.54 cm diameter, 15 cm twist, and 20 cm overall
length was used. The drill bit was sharpened using a triangular file sharpener two to
three times a day to ensure effective drilling and cutting of the oleoresin canals.
Immediately after the boreholes were drilled, a chemical stimulant was applied to
the hole using a handheld pump compression sprayer. Several chemical stimulants
were tested in this study. The compression sprayer was equipped with a cone shaped
nozzle that allowed for the application of the chemical solution on the entire surface
inside the hole. Approximately 2 ml of the chemical solution was sprayed into each
borehole. The chemical treatments were assigned randomly to the trees in the
experiment prior to visiting the field site. Each treatment had a sample size of 40 trees
and 320 trees per site were tapped. These treatments were replicated across three
different age groups and across three tapping seasons between 2013 and 2015 (Table
3-1).
Following the chemical application, a 1.905 cm PVC Lasco male adapter fitting
was inserted into the borehole using a mallet to seal it securely. A 3-ply
polyethylene/nylon laminate bag with a 2-liter capacity was attached to the fitting and
secured using a cable tie. The collection bags were left in the field for 60 to 120 days
until weighed and collected once.
During the 2014 tapping season, tapped trees were also injected about 30 days
after tapping with an additional chemical stimulant above and in between the two
boreholes using an Arbojet Quikjet in-tree injector. During the 2015 tapping season,
trees were injected two weeks prior to drilling the boreholes at select sites. These
treatments were replicated across 6 sites and across all chemical treatments.
105
Chemical Stimulants
Several chemical solutions were tested to stimulate the production of oleoresin in
slash pine. At each site, 320 trees were selected and four chemical inducers were
tested. Each chemical stimulant treatment had 80 replicates per site. In the 2013 field
season, a combination of deionized water, sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and Tween 20
(surfactant) was applied as the control treatment. In addition to this solution, methyl
jasmonate with a concentration of 100 mM, 10% ethephon (2-chloroethyl-phosphonic
acid, an ethylene precursor), and a combination of the two were added as a stimulant
treatment.
During the 2014 to 2015 field seasons, sulfuric acid was no longer used in the
chemical solutions. The control treatment consisted of deionized water and Tween 20.
For the stimulant treatments, 100 mM methyl jasmonate, 10% ethephon, and a
combination of methyl jasmonate and ethephon were used. During the 2014 field
season, a stimulant treatment of iron sulfate with methyl jasmonate was used instead of
the methyl jasmonate and ethephon combination treatment. These same stimulants
were also injected into the appropriate tapped trees using an in-tree injector after
borehole drilling in 2014 and prior to borehole drilling in 2015. Each chemical treatment
with and without an in-tree injection had 40 replicate trees, conforming a total of eight
treatment combinations.
Data Collection
DBH, tree height, crown height, and crown width was measured for each tree
selected for tapping within two weeks of tapping. Table 3-2 summarizes the statistics for
all sites tapped from 2013 through 2015. The DBH was measured using a standard
106
fabric diameter tape. The tree and crown heights were measured using a Haglöf Vertex
IV Hypsometer (Sweden), which was recalibrated daily. Crown width was measured
both along and across the bed using a measuring tape and two field assistants. To
measure crown, the longest branch on each side of the tree that was part of the crown
was selected. If the longest branch was isolated and not part of the main tree crown it
was not selected. Crown volume was then calculated based on the crown height, tree
height, and crown width measurement using the standard formula for the volume of a
cone:
Volume = π * r2 * (h/3); where r is the radius based on the arithmetic average radius of the crown width measurements, and h is the height of the live crown calculated by subtracting lower crown height from total tree height.
Two to three months after tapping the trees, the bags containing oleoresin were
collected from the field and weighed. Net oleoresin yield for each borehole was
measured using a digital scale with a hook, a 50 kg capacity, and a 5 g or 10 g accuracy
at the end of the tapping season. Once all the measurements were taken, the bags
were then drained into plastic barrels for collection.
Tapping Area
The oleoresin yields per unit area tapped were calculated from the cross-
sectional area of the individual borehole as well as the estimated sector-shaped tapping
area of the tree stem. The cross-sectional area of the borehole was estimated as a
polygon with sides a-b-c-d (Figure 3-1). The tapping area was considered as the area in
which there is access to resin canals from the borehole tapped. The projected area was
estimated from the extremities of the borehole and the center of the tapped tree (Figure
3-1; Figure 3-2). The areas were estimated using trigonometric formulas for the area of
107
a triangle. The predicted stump diameter was calculated using the taper equation
developed by Bailey (1994) for slash pine trees. To estimate the outer bark stump
diameter in cm for slash pine trees the equation used was: Db = D (137.16
hb)β
, where Db is
the stump diameter, D is the DBH calculated at breast height (1.37 m), hb is the height
of the stump which is equal to the height of borehole (assumed to be 15.24 cm for all
tapped trees), and β is the constant parameter for slash pine trees (0.094138) based on
a fitted equation (Bailey, 1994).
The following are the formulas used to calculate the angles to determine the area
in cm2 of the projected triangle (c-x-y) or shaded tapping area in cases where the
borehole depth (10.16 cm) was less than the stump radius (Figure 3-1):
<β = sin-1 [
3.81
r]
<λ = tan-1 [
6.35
r-bd]
<α = <λ -<β
Tapped Sector Area (cm2) =
α
360 × r2× π
Where r is the radius in cm calculated from the estimated stump diameter (Db/2),
bd is the depth of the borehole (10.16 cm for all tapped trees).
The following formulas were used to calculate the angles to determine the
tapping area in cm2 in cases where the borehole depth (10.16 cm) was greater than the
stump radius (Figure 3-2):
<β = sin-1 [
3.81
r]
108
<λ = tan-1 [
bd-r
3.81]
<α = (<λ +<90) − <β
Tapped Sector Area (cm2) =
α
360 × r2× π
Where r is the radius calculated from the estimated stump diameter (d), bd is the
depth of the borehole (10.16 cm for all tapped trees).
The following are the formulas used to calculate the tapping intensity (Figure 3-1;
Figure 3-2):
Tree Basal Area (cm2) = (0.00007854 × d2) × 10000
Tree Tapping Intensity (%) = Tapped Sector Area
Tree Basal Area× 10000
Statistical Analysis
To assess the main effects of chemical treatment, DBH, number of collection
days, site, age, and crown volume on oleoresin yield, a general linear model was fitted
using R 3.1.1 and ASReml-R v.3 (R Development Core Team, 2016; Gilmour et al.,
2015). The data were analyzed by site, by stand, by chemical treatment, and by number
of collection days. The following example model, with covariates, was used:
Y = µ + T + Co + D + A + CV + S + St + e
where, µ is the overall mean; T is the fixed effect of chemical treatment; Co is the fixed
effect of number of collection days; D is the fixed effect of DBH (cm); A is the fixed
effect of age (years); CV is the fixed effect of crown volume (m3); S is the fixed effect of
site; St is the fixed effect of stand; and e is the random error.
To assess the individual and interactive effects of treatment, number of collection
days, DBH, age, and crown volume on oleoresin yield, a general linear model was fitted
oleoresin yield per borehole area and per sector area is inversely related to tapping
intensities.
117
Discussion
Assessing the effects of chemical inducers, tree morphology and site
characteristics on the yield of oleoresin in slash pine is important to evaluate the
potential for the reinvigoration of the oleoresin tapping industry in the southern U.S. The
borehole tapping method used in this study has been used in other studies within the
U.S. (Hodges, 1995; Hodges, 2000), and has also been used in India (Lekha, 2002).
Compared with previous reports, this study collected oleoresin from younger trees (from
11 to 23 years), which would allow oleoresin to be collected prior to typical final stand
harvest for timber products in North Florida.
Oleoresin yield using the short-term tapping method (Knebel et al., 2008) and the
Chinese tapping method, described in Chapter 2 (Wang et al., 2006) was positively
correlated with stand age. In this study although we observed a general increase in
oleoresin yield with tree age, when accounting for the number of collection days, stand
age was not a significant variable with oleoresin yield (Table 3-3). One explanation for
age not being significant is that the tapped trees were in a narrow age range (15-23
years) and based on cambial age changes in chemical and mechanical wood properties
of loblolly pine all trees are making mature wood. Thus, tree size rather than age is
correlated with yield.
Tree size, more specifically DBH was positively correlated with oleoresin yield,
where the overall trend was increased oleoresin yield in larger diameter trees. The trees
in the larger diameter classes yielded about twice the quantity of oleoresin compared to
trees in smaller diameter classes. These results are similar to those reported for older
trees by Hodges (1995), Tadesse et al. (2001), and Hadiyane et al. (2015).
118
In North Florida with the borehole tapping system, chemical stimulants were the
most effective method for increasing oleoresin yields in slash pine trees. Across all
sites, all ages, and all tapping years, methyl jasmonate was consistently the most
effective chemical stimulant, increasing yields on average by 0.3 kg per tree. It has
been reported that methyl jasmonate induces new traumatic resin canal formation and
increases wood terpene content (Franceschi et al., 2002; Hudgins et al., 2003; Martin et
al., 2003; Hudgins et al., 2004). Methyl jasmonate has also been found to increase
monoterpene levels in the stem (Huber et al., 2005) which, in turn, reduces viscosity
and crystallization rate allowing oleoresin to continue flowing (Hodges, 1995). The
yields at all other sites during the three tapping years showed that methyl jasmonate
increased oleoresin yields greater than the other chemical stimulants tested; therefore,
we believe that the lack of effect at the 2014 Union 1 and Alachua 3 sites and 2015
Alachua 4 and Bradford 1 sites (Table 3-2), is likely due to human error in the
application of the chemical. The results show that to sustainably collect oleoresin from
pine trees in a commercial operation, it is crucial to apply stimulant to the trees after
wounding.
The additional in-tree injection treatment was done to provide more chemical
stimulant, both before or after tapping, with the hypothesis that this would promote
oleoresin yields. In-tree injection did not significantly affect yield of oleoresin. In some
cases, this added treatment was detrimental to yields. The in-tree injection may have a
negative effect on oleoresin yields because creating an extra wound site, no matter how
small, may draw oleoresin production away from the collection site. To stimulate an
119
increase of oleoresin flow from an already tapped collection site, it may be more useful
to either increase the size of the wounding site by re-drilling a slightly larger hole or re-
applying the chemical stimulant as tested by Lekha (2002). This, however, would be
very time-consuming and may not be cost-effective in the long run, especially in the
U.S. where the cost of labor is high.
Stands managed for pine straw raking had significantly greater oleoresin yields
compared to stands managed solely for timber. We also found that the stands managed
for pine straw raking showed a significant positive effect of ethephon as a stimulant.
These greater yields may be a result of the more intensive management of understory
competition and/or the more intensive fertilizer application. Knebel et al. (2008)
observed two to four times greater oleoresin flow of young Pinus taeda in North
Carolina, U.S. from trees that were fertilized compared to unfertilized. However, other
studies did not find a positive impact on oleoresin yields due to fertilization (Lombardero
et al., 2000; Wei et al., 2004; Klepzig et al., 2005). Moreover, the lack of nutrient
availability due to overcrowding in a stand can negatively impact the yield of oleoresin
(Lorio, 1986). Thus, the higher yields of oleoresin observed in the pine straw raking site
may be due to the decrease in understory competition from more active management.
This also supports the idea that managing stands in the Southern U.S. for both timber
and non-timber products by collecting pine straw and oleoresin in live trees prior to
harvesting timber could lead to greater value for landowners (Susaeta et al., 2014). The
soil nutrient levels were not tested at any of our sites, so we cannot determine whether
soil nutrient deficiencies had a negative impact on oleoresin yields.
120
With the bark streak method, Mason (1971) found a negative effect of stand
density on the yield of oleoresin. Overall stand productivity is improved by managing the
stand density using various silvicultural techniques such as thinning (Reineke, 1933;
Mason, 1971; Jokela, 2004; Wallin et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2006). We hypothesized
that trees with larger crown volume should produce more oleoresin. Decreasing stand
density reduces competition among trees and promotes growth by increasing tree
crown size and leaf area. We measured crown volume and found that in the overall
analysis it was significantly correlated with oleoresin yield (Table 3-3). However, crown
volume was only significant at three of the 15 stands and only in one year at two of the
sites which were tapped for multiple years (Table 3-5). Our results did not show a
positive effect of thinning on the overall yield of oleoresin. One explanation for no effect
is that thinned and unthinned stands at different locations we compared and the DBH of
the trees tapped within each stand were similar. We did not calculate the stand density
at each site; future studies evaluating the impacts of stand density on oleoresin yield
would be valuable.
Total tree oleoresin yield in a collection season was higher for trees tapped at
lower intensities. Furthermore, sector area and hole area yields decreased as the
tapping intensity increased. Hodges (1995) also reported similar results with the
negative impact of increased tapping intensities on oleoresin yields per unit tree basal
area. This suggests that it would be more beneficial to select larger diameter trees for
tapping slash pine for oleoresin.
While oleoresin yields from trees using the borehole tapping method vary
considerably, it is possible to predict potential yields from a stand. DBH was the
121
strongest predictor variable for oleoresin yields across all sites, stands, chemical
inducers, and number of collection days. Chemical treatment also had a significant
impact on yields and was the most effective method of increasing production within a
stand. In the full general linear model analysis, a positive significant effect of chemical
treatment, collection days, DBH, and crown volume on oleoresin yields were observed.
This shows that to increase production in slash pine trees chemical stimulants should
be applied to the wounding site, the collection season should last for as long as
possible, and trees with larger stem diameters and crowns are favorable.
Summary and Conclusions
The objectives of this study were to test the effects of chemical stimulants, tree
size, stand age, and stand management on the yield of oleoresin in slash pine trees.
Our results suggest a general positive effect of DBH on the yield of oleoresin. Methyl
jasmonate, whether alone or applied with another stimulant, was the most effective at
stimulating and increasing the yields of oleoresin within a tree. Our results showed that
yields averaged 1.0 to 1.5 kg of oleoresin per tree from young slash pine stands aged
between 11 and 22 years using the standard borehole tapping method and applying
methyl jasmonate as a stimulant. The number of days between oleoresin tapping and
final collection has a significant effect on the final season yields and thus it is
recommended to allow oleoresin flow for at least 120 days. Future studies could
evaluate the impact of soil nutrient availability on oleoresin yields in North Florida. The
soils in southern U.S. tend to be nutrient poor and thus require fertilization, so there may
be some inherent limitations to oleoresin production due to lack of site resources.
122
Table 3-1. Summary of treatments for oleoresin tapping during the 2013 to 2015 field study.
Age Pine Straw Thinning Inducers Inducer Application Total #
11 N N Control MeJ Eth M+E Whole Tree Base 320 15 Y N Control MeJ Eth M+E Whole Tree Base 320 15 N Y Control MeJ Eth M+E Whole Tree Base 320 15 N N Control MeJ Eth M+E Whole Tree Base 320 22 N Y Control MeJ Eth M+E Whole Tree Base 320 22 N N Control MeJ Eth M+E Whole Tree Base 320
123
Table 3-2. Summary of sites selected for oleoresin tapping during the 2013 to 2015 field study.
Fall 2013
Stand Age Thinning Management Site
Site Index Soil Series
Mean DBH (cm)
Mean Height (m)
14 Not Thinned No Pine Straw Union 1 76 Mascotte Sand 18.6 17.2
16 Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 1 76 Newnan/Wauchula/Ponoma Sand 19.9 17.8
22 Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 2 63 Newnan Sand 21.6 18.1
Summer 2014
Stand Age Thinning Management Site
Site Index Soil Series
Mean DBH (cm)
Mean Height (m)
11 Not Thinned No Pine Straw Bradford 1 70 Sapello Sand 17.3 12.2
15 Not Thinned No Pine Straw Union 1 76 Mascotte Sand 19.2 16.3
15 Not Thinned Pine Straw Union 2 NA Mascotte Sand 19.6 17.0
15 Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 3 84 Ponoma Sand 21.3 17.7
22 Not Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 4 90 Newnan Sand 20.6 17.0
22 Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 5 64 Ponoma Sand 22.1 18.7
Summer 2015
Stand Age Thinning Management Site
Site Index Soil Series
Mean DBH (cm)
Mean Height (m)
12 Not Thinned No Pine Straw Bradford 1 70 Sapello Sand 17.4 12.9
16 Not Thinned No Pine Straw Union 1 76 Mascotte Sand 18.0 18.0
16 Not Thinned Pine Straw Union 2 NA Mascotte Sand 19.5 18.0
16 Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 3 84 Ponoma Sand 21.9 18.1
23 Not Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 4 90 Newnan Sand 22.1 18.8
23 Thinned No Pine Straw Alachua 5 64 Ponoma Sand 20.1 17.8
124
Table 3-3. Summary of main and interactive effects on oleoresin yield in sites using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model with covariates.
Effect DF Den DF p-value
Treatment 9 32.8 <0.001**
Collection 1 236.9 <0.001**
DBH 1 4232.3 <0.001**
Age 1 10.0 0.850
Crown 1 3791.9 0.020*
Treatment:Collection 9 156.1 <0.001**
Treatment:DBH 9 4136.3 0.049*
Treatment:Age 9 39.8 0.100
Treatment:Crown 9 3664.7 0.009**
Collection:DBH 1 3854.5 0.940
Collection:Age 1 2139.9 0.320
Collection:Crown 1 3792.3 0.140
DBH:Age 1 3061.1 0.800
DBH:Crown 1 2410.6 <0.001**
Age:Crown 1 2960.9 0.420
Treatment:Collection:DBH 9 3425.0 <0.001**
Treatment:DBH:Crown 9 3384.4 0.020*
Note: P-values with * superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.05, while p-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01.
125
Table 3-4. Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yield by site using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates.
Site Chemical Treatment DBH Age Collection Days Crown Volume
Note: P-values with * superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.05, while p-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01.
126
Table 3-5. Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yield by stand using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates.
Stand Chemical Treatment DBH Collection Days Crown Volume
2013 Union 1 122.70 (<0.001**) 31.40 (0.040*) NA 6.72 (0.010*)
2014 Alachua 3 16.72 (<0.001**) 47.52 (<0.001**) NA 0.08 (0.780)
2014 Alachua 4 4.26 (<0.001**) 58.39 (<0.001**) NA 0.66 (0.420)
2014 Alachua 5 14.35 (<0.001**) 76.19 (<0.001**) NA 3.40 (0.070)
2014 Union 1 5.38 (<0.001**) 23.76 (0.030*) NA 2.46 (0.120)
2014 Union 2 18.25 (<0.001**) 38.42 (0.007**) NA 11.18 (<0.001**)
2014 Bradford 1 38.79 (<0.001**) 2.95 (0.100) NA 0.17 (0.680)
2015 Alachua 3 28.24 (<0.001**) 51.33 (<0.001**) NA 0.02 (0.890)
2015 Alachua 4 11.78 (<0.001**) 104.90 (<0.001**) NA 0.61 (0.440)
2015 Alachua 5 50.63 (<0.001**) 67.93 (<0.001**) NA 3.29 (0.070)
2015 Union 1 8.22 (<0.001**) 102.20 (<0.001**) NA 1.25 (0.260)
2015 Union 2 15.86 (<0.001**) 25.35 (0.001**) NA 2.26 (0.130)
2015 Bradford 1 33.48 (<0.001**) 28.50 (<0.001**) NA 6.08 (0.010*)
Note: P-values with * superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.05, while p-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01.
127
Table 3-6. Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yield by chemical treatment using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates.
Treatment Site DBH Collection Days Crown Volume
Control 11.22 (<0.001**) 102.40 (<0.001**) 88.10 (<0.001**) 10.19 (0.001**)
MeJaEthephon/Whole 4.03 (<0.001**) 44.10 (<0.001**) NA 1.49 (0.220)
FeSMeJa 10.60 (0.002**) 26.66 (<0.001**) NA 0.05 (0.830)
FeSMeJa/Whole 3.32 (0.110) 30.03 (<0.001**) NA 1.06 (0.300)
Note: P-values with * superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.05, while p-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01.
128
Table 3-7. Summary of main effects F-statistic and p-values on oleoresin yields by collection days drilled using the standard borehole tapping method between 2013 to 2015 based on a general linear model without covariates.
Collection Days Treatment DBH Stand Crown Volume
57 8.22 (<0.001**) 102.20 (<0.001**) NA 1.25 (0.260)
63 15.86 (<0.001**) 25.35 (0.001**) NA 2.26 (0.130)
68 50.63 (<0.001**) 67.93 (<0.001**) NA 3.29 (0.070)
69 33.48 (<0.001**) 28.50 (<0.001**) NA 6.08 (0.010*)
71 28.24 (<0.001**) 51.33 (<0.001**) NA 0.02 (0.890)
73 215.40 (<0.001**) 15.74 (0.690) NA 8.22 (0.004**)
76 11.78 (<0.001**) 104.90 (<0.001**) NA 0.61 (0.440)
85 31.52 (<0.001**) 27.98 (<0.001**) NA 0.01 (0.920)
86 3.73 (<0.008**) 23.39 (<0.001**) NA 1.81 (0.180)
88 0.00 (0.440) 0.85 (0.630) NA 3.47 (0.080)
90 1.12 (0.350) 3.03 (0.050) NA 0.97 (0.330)
128 5.38 (<0.001**) 23.76 (0.030*) NA 2.46 (0.120)
130 18.25 (<0.001**) 38.42 (0.007**) NA 11.18 (<0.001**)
133 16.72 (<0.001**) 47.52 (<0.001**) NA 0.08 (0.780)
140 4.26 (<0.001**) 58.39 (<0.001**) NA 0.66 (0.420)
147 38.79 (<0.001**) 2.95 (0.100) NA 0.17 (0.680)
Note: P-values with * superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.05, while p-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01.
129
Table 3-8. Summary of oleoresin yields by stand age from tapping slash pine using the borehole tapping method. Trees were tapped between summer and early fall of 2013-2015.
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
Stand Age (years)
Number of Trees Tapped
Mean Collection Days
Mean DBH (cm)
Mean Tree Yield (kg)
SE Tree Yield (kg)
CV (%)
11 320 147 17.26 0.691b 0.021 55.03
12 304 69 17.40 0.528c 0.023 76.96
14 318 73 18.63 0.660b 0.018 47.54
15 949 130 20.02 0.792a 0.014 54.63
16 1247 69 20.02 0.647b 0.011 59.62
22 909 113 21.49 0.811a 0.015 55.80
23 624 72 21.13 0.699b 0.019 69.30
130
Table 3-9. Summary of oleoresin yields per collection day by age from tapping slash pine trees using the borehole tapping method. The trees were tapped between summer and early fall 2013-2015.
Age (years) Mean Yield Per Day (g/day) SE (g/day) CV (%)
11 4.699d 0.14 55.03
12 7.657b 0.34 76.96
14 9.108a 0.24 47.48
15 6.084c 0.11 54.80
16 9.509a 0.16 59.63
22 7.492b 0.15 61.35
23 9.863a 0.29 72.70
Note: The ages with different letter superscripts were significantly different from Tukey’s HSD test (p-value < 0.05)
131
Table 3-10. Summary of oleoresin yields per collection day by age from tapping slash pine trees using the borehole tapping method. The trees were tapped between summer and early fall 2013-2015.
Tapping Year Age (years) Mean Yield (g) SE (g) CV (%)
Note: The ages with different significance level letters within a tapping season were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value < 0.05)
132
Table 3-11. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment from tapping slash pine using the borehole tapping method. Trees were tapped between summer and early fall of 2013-2015. Chemical stimulants tested include ethephon, Methyl jasmonate (MeJa), iron sulfate mixed with methyl jasmonate (FeSMeJa), and Methyl jasmonate mixed with ethephon (MeJaEthephon).
Chemical Treatment Number of Trees Tapped Mean Yield (kg) SE (kg) CV (%)
Control (no chemical) 1153 0.493d 0.0083 56.86
Ethephon 1173 0.611c 0.0099 55.46
FeSMeJa 467 0.860ab 0.0188 47.30
MeJa 1182 0.896a 0.0148 56.66
MejaEthephon 697 0.830b 0.0158 50.19
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
133
Figure 3-1. Calculations for the cross-sectional tapping area and individual hole area
model for the trees with DBH greater than 10.16 cm. c is the center of the tree, r is the radius calculated using the predicted stump diameter, bd represents the borehole depth, and bw represents the borehole width. The tapping area is the triangle c-y-x
134
Figure 3-2. Calculations for the cross-sectional tapping area and individual hole area model for the trees with DBH less than 10.16 cm. c is the center of the tree, r is the radius calculated using the predicted stump diameter, bd represents the borehole depth, bw represents the borehole width, and the shaded area is the tapping area.
135
Figure 3-3. Age effect on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping slash
pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
2013 2014 2015
To
tal Y
ield
(kg
)
Tapping Year
11/12 Years 14/15 Years 16 Years 22/23 Years
a
a
aaab
b
c
c
136
Figure 3-4. Chemical effect on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping
slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
137
Figure 3-5. Chemical effects of oleoresin yield (g) per day with standard errors when
tapping slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
138
Figure 3-6. Nonlinear regression displaying the actual relationship between average
oleoresin yield (kg) in slash pine and DBH in cm for all trees tapped in the 2013 to 2015 tapping season.
139
Figure 3-7. Effect of pine straw management and thinning on oleoresin yield (kg) with
standard errors when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
140
A
B
Figure 3-8. Chemical effect on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in
North Florida during the 2013 to 2015 field seasons under different management scenarios. A) Effect of managing stands for pine straw raking, B) Effect of thinning.
141
Figure 3-9. Bivariate fit of total tree yield of oleoresin (kg) in slash pine by tapping
intensity. The r2 for the linear relationship between tapping intensity and average total tree yield is 0.388 (p-value <0.0001).
142
Figure 3-10. Bivariate fit of sector area yield of oleoresin in slash pine by tapping
intensity. The r2 for the linear relationship between tapping intensity and average yield per sector area is 0.22 (p-value <0.0001).
143
Figure 3-11. Bivariate fit of hole area yield of oleoresin in slash pine by tapping
intensity. The r2 for the linear relationship between tapping intensity and average yield per hole area is 0.39 (p-value <0.0001).
144
CHAPTER 4 CHEMICAL STIMULANT DOSAGE AND CARRIER SOLVENTS IN THE BOREHOLE
METHOD TO INCREASE OLEORESIN YIELD IN SLASH PINE
Introduction
With the desire for increased energy security and to mitigate global warming, the
U.S. demand for alternatives to petroleum based fuel is high. Using woody biomass as
biofuel feedstocks can help increase the value of timber land in the southern U.S.
Chapter 2 reviewed global and U.S. demand for pine terpenes and the established
market for pine chemicals. Terpene extraction from slash pine trees can help meet the
market demands for biofuel, jet fuel, and strengthen energy security, providing an
alternative to petroleum (Barranx et al., 2002). Currently, in the U.S. the pulping
processes extract hemicelluloses from conifers which can be fermented to produce
cellulosic ethanol (Nesbit et al., 2011). In their study, Nesbit et al. (2011) concluded that
the most profitable scenario for non-industrial forest landowners in the southern U.S.
was the production of traditional timber products with the collection of harvest residues
to produce biofuels. While this form of ethanol production is not yet cost-competitive
with traditional corn-based ethanol, it will become more competitive as the technology
develops and improves (Nesbit et al. 2011). However, the technique of removing
biomass residues on site can lead to diminishing growth yields overtime due to the
removal of soil nutrients (Eisenbies et al., 2009; Nesbit et al. 2011). The nutrients in the
soil can be replaced by increasing fertilization rates from 45% to 60% in certain sites
(Eisenbies et al., 2009). On the other hand, with the oleoresin tapping technique
considered in this study, pine terpenes can be extracted directly from live trees without
the removal of residual biomass. This technique also allows for traditional timber
harvest in conjunction with oleoresin collection.
145
Oleoresin is currently collected from live trees in various countries using primarily
a method of tapping involving the removal of streak of bark. Most resin is collected in
countries with low cost labor and use methods where laborers visit the tree multiple
times during a tapping season. These methods are not economically feasible in the U.S.
due to high labor cost, even though the southern U.S. has extensive planted and natural
slash pine forests available. The borehole tapping method is the most attractive
oleoresin production method for use in the U.S. (Hodges, 1995; Hodges 2000).
However, to commercialize production of oleoresin in the U.S. and be competitive global
producers, it is crucial to increase the yield of oleoresin per individual tree.
Terpene production in conifers has been found to increase significantly with the
application of chemical stimulants. Martin et al. (2003) studied the effects of spraying
methyl jasmonate on the terpene formation in needles of Norway spruce (Picea abies
Karst.) saplings. Without wounding the saplings, Martin et al. (2003) observed a 2-fold
increase in terpene accumulation and a 5-fold increase in terpene emission from the
foliage. Past studies have determined that the increase in terpene production in the
stem after the application of methyl jasmonate was due to the formation of new
traumatic axial resin canals (Franceschi et al., 2002; Martin et al., 2003; Hudgins et al.,
2004). However, limited research has explored the dynamic between chemical dosage
of methyl jasmonate and oleoresin yields in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. Var.
elliottii) trees.
The primary goal of this research is to develop optimal and sustainable methods
for increasing oleoresin yields from live slash pine trees in the southern U.S. In Chapter
3 the yield of oleoresin was compared with various chemical stimulants, stand
146
management techniques, and stand age, and assessed relationships between yield and
various tree phenotypic characteristics. Here, chemical concentrations and stimulant
solvents were investigated to identify methods to improve oleoresin yield per individual
tree. Because methyl jasmonate was the most effective chemical at stimulating
oleoresin yield and production in slash pine (Chapter 3), we focused on this chemical.
Therefore, the objectives of this study are: 1) to determine which concentration of
methyl jasmonate and, 2) to identify which carrier solvent is most effective to increase
oleoresin yield.
Methods
Study Areas
The same thinned slash pine stand in Alachua county described in Chapter 3
(Alachua 3) was used for the dosage carrier solvent experiments. This site was 15
years old in 2014 and 17 years old in 2016, is located just outside of Gainesville, Florida
(29°46’N latitude and 82°18’W longitude) at an elevation 51 meters from average sea
level. This stand was managed using conventional silvicultural practices including
bedding, weed control, and fertilizer treatments. Trees with prominent physical signs
and symptoms of diseases such as fusiform rust (Cronartium fusiforme Hedgcock &
Table 4-2. Effects of methyl jasmonate carrier solvent, DBH, height and crown volume on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard borehole tapping method.
Chemical Treatment DBH(cm) Tree Height (m) Crown Volume (m3) Oleoresin Yield (kg)
Average SE Average SE Average SE Average SE Alcohol 22.845a 0.54 20.115a 0.22 47.891a 4.17 1.507a 0.12 Tween 21.873a 0.52 19.594a 0.24 44.064a 3.66 0.936b 0.11
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
158
Table 4-3. Estimated cost per tree of borehole tapping method to collect oleoresin. Calculated costs are based on productivity rates of tapping 26.7 trees per hour and applying 400 mM of methyl jasmonate diluted in 90% ethanol. Adapted from Hodges and Ferguson (2011).
Cost Category / Item Quantity per tree
Units Unit Price Cost per
Tree
Supplies
Spouts: 2.54 x 12.7 cm PVC pipe, or custom molded PE 2 Ea. $0.150 $0.300 Collection bags, Nylon/PE laminate, 6x20 in. 2 Ea. $0.090 $0.180 Cable ties for bag closure 2 Ea. $0.010 $0.020 Methyl jasmonate – 400 mM 2 Dose $0.553 $1.105 Distilled water 2 Dose $0.001 $0.002 Ethanol 2 Dose $0.141 $0.281 Diesel fuel for drill machine and utility vehicle 0.050 Gal. $3.00 $0.150 Gasoline and oil for power drill 0.004 Gal. $4.50 $0.019
Subtotal supplies $2.205
Labor
Borehole Treatment/Installation (3-man crew, average productivity rate)
Power drill (Sthil BT45) 2 $450 $900 $0.004 Drill bits: 2.54 cm 3 $25 $75 $0.000 Chemical sprayer 2 $100 $200 $0.001 Small tools: mallet, machete, pliers, measuring cup 4 $50 $200 $0.001
Rubber gloves (for chemical mixing and resin handling) 100 $3 $300 $0.001
Note: Equipment costs depreciated over useful life of 250,000 trees; does not include transportation equipment. The cost of 1 kg of methyl jasmonate from Bedoukian Research is $3080. The cost per tree of 100 mM methyl jasmonate is $0.276; the cost per tree of 600 mM methyl jasmonate is $1.658
Predicted average yield per tree at 100 days (Kg) 3.000 Total Cost Per Kg Resin $1.214
Note: Equipment costs depreciated over useful life of 250,000 trees; does not include highway transportation equipment. The cost of 1 kg of methyl jasmonate from Bedoukian Research is $3080. The cost per tree of 100 mM methyl jasmonate is $0.276; the cost per tree of 600 mM methyl jasmonate is $1.658
160
Figure 4-1. Chemical dose effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when
tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard tapping method. The different doses are methyl jasmonate concentrations (50 mM, 100 mM, and 400 mM) and ethephon percentages (1%, 5%, and 10%). The means within a methyl jasmonate concentration with a different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
50 mM 100 mM 400 mM
Ole
ore
sin
Yie
ld (
kg
)
Methyl Jasmonate Concentration
1% 5% 10%
ab
c
bc
a
ab
abab
ab
a
Ethephon Concentration
161
Figure 4-2. Chemical dose effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when
tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard tapping method. The different doses are methyl jasmonate concentrations in DI water and Tween 20. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
162
Figure 4-3. Cumulative flow rate of oleoresin (g) since day of tapping treatment by
chemical treatment at the 2015 dose response test. The following equations correspond to the oleoresin flow rate when trees are stimulated by the different methyl jasmonate doses: control: y = 652.107 * (1 – 0.891 e-0.027D ); 25 mM: y = 1004.612 * (1 – 0.928 e-0.019D ); 50 mM: y = 1097.538 * (1 – 0.991 e-0.023D ); 100 mM: y = 1502.460 * (1 – 0.913 e-0.019D ); 200 mM: y = 2509.604 * (1 – 0.944 e-0.012D ); 400 mM: y = 2723.893 * (1 – 0.948 e-0.012D ); 600 mM: y = 5508.152 * (1 – 0.961 e-0.005D ). Where y corresponds to oleoresin yield (g) and D corresponds to number of days since treatment.
163
Figure 4-4. Cumulative flow of oleoresin (g) and resin flow rate over time since day of
tapping treatment in Gainesville at the 2015 methyl jasmonate dose response test.
164
Figure 4-5. Effect of carrier solvent on oleoresin yield (kg) for 100 mM methyl
jasmonate when tapping slash pine trees in North Florida using the standard borehole drilling method. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
165
Figure 4-6. Chemical dose effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when
tapping slash pine trees in 2016 using the standard tapping method. The different doses are methyl jasmonate concentrations diluted in 90% ethanol. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
166
CHAPTER 5 GENETIC EFFECTS ON OLEORESIN FLOW OF SLASH PINE CLONES
Introduction
The individual tree variation in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. Var. elliottii)
oleoresin composition is high and suggests that many components are under genetic
control (Squillace and Fisher, 1966). In Chapter 2, the variation of oleoresin flow and
yield among conifer species were discussed. The flow rate of oleoresin is influenced by
environmental and biological factors. Resin duct size, number, and length, oleoresin
viscosity, crystallization rate, and exudation pressure can all affect the rate of flow of
resin and potential yield (USDA Forest Service, 1971a; Hodges, 1995). These resin and
tree properties are not only different among conifer species, but can be controlled by
genetics within species (Schopmeyer et al., 1954; USDA Forest Service, 1971a; USDA
Forest Service, 1971b; Hodges, 1995; Sukarno et al., 2015). The duration of oleoresin
flow also varies within and among species and in the southeast U.S.; oleoresin in slash
pine trees flows for months, while oleoresin flow in loblolly pine tends to slow
dramatically after 2 days (Hodges et al., 1977).
There is a great potential of increasing productivity in an oleoresin tapping
operation through breeding programs due to the high broad-sense heritability of growth
traits that have a direct influence on yield as well as the heritability of oleoresin flow and
yield (Schopmeyer et al., 1954; Franklin et al., 1970; USDA Forest Service, 1971a;
USDA Forest Service, 1971b; Westbrook et al., 2013; Sukarno et al., 2015). Increasing
the productivity of southeastern pine species through intensive forest management and
selective breeding is crucial to ensure global timber and non-timber forest products
demands are met.
167
The first objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between short
term with long term oleoresin yield of slash pine trees by using the CCLONES 2 site
established by the University of Florida’s FBRC. A strong genetic correlation between
short term and long-term oleoresin yields would allow us to screen trees more cost
effectively for making selections. The second objective of this study was to estimate
heritability of the oleoresin flow traits among various families to determine the level of
genetic control of this trait.
Methods
Study Area
The slash pine CCLONES 2 (Comparing Clonal Lines On Experimental Sites)
stand used for this study was established by the University of Florida’s FBRC in
December 2002 (FBRC, 2002). This study was located in a low rust hazard property
owned and managed by Rayonier Inc. in northeast Gainesville, Florida (29°43’45.7” N,
82°17’46.0” W). The study was established by the FBRC, Rayonier Inc., and Boise
Corp. to better understand clonal biology and to “characterize elite genotypes of slash
pine and to understand their growth dynamics, ecophysiology, nutrition, pest resistance
and wood quality across a range of planting sites and management intensities as both
cuttings (clones from FS families) and seedlings (FS families)” (FBRC, 2002).
The study area was prepared with chopping, raking and bedding between April
and May 2002. In September 2002, the site was treated with 48 ounces Chopper and
five quarts Conquer and in November 2002, a second bed was established in the study
area. The site was then planted with test, border and filler trees in December 2002. The
study area was divided into eight replicate plots; four intensively managed plots
168
(replicates 5, 6, 7, and 8) and four non-intensively managed plots (replicates 1, 2, 3, 4).
In November 2002, the intensive treatments received an additional herbicide treatment
of 20% Garlon with 80% JLB Oil applied by hand on palmetto stems. In April 2003, the
whole study area was treated with three ounces Oust per acre in 20 gallons of water via
broadcast application using a tractor to control herbaceous weeds. Between September
and October 2003, the whole study area received 200 lbs per acre of diammonium
phosphate (DAP) via helicopter and 50 per acre DAP via four-wheeler.
The study area has a humid subtropical climate with hot wet summers and mild
dry winters, and the topography was flat with a slope between 0 and 2%. The study was
established on a poorly drained site and the dominant soil series was Wauchula. The
Wauchula series is a Spodosol and is classified as a sandy over loamy, siliceous,
active, hyperthermic Ultic Alaquods (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
1993b). The understory vegetation included saw palmetto (Serenoa repens (B.) Small.),
Note: short-term oleoresin was collected in a 24-hour period and long-term oleoresin was collected over four months.
179
Table 5-3. Tukey significance group letters of the least square means for phenotypic traits measured at the CCLONES 2 study (alpha < 0.05) recorded in Table 5-2.
Family ID DBH (cm) Short-Term Oleoresin Yield (g)
Long-Term Oleoresin Yield (g)
501 ABC ABCD AB 502 ABCD D AB 504 A CD AB 505 DEF ABCD AB 521 BCDEF BCD A 529 AB ABCD AB 530 BCDEF ABC AB 531 BCDEF BCD AB 532 FG D AB 533 AB ABCD AB 534 G BCD B 535 CDEF BCD AB 537 ABCDE BCD AB 538 CDEF AB AB 539 AB A AB 540 EF ABCD AB
Note: The different Tukey group letters were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05). Short-term oleoresin was collected in a 24-hour period and long-term oleoresin was collected over four months.
180
Table 5-4. Broad sense heritability estimates calculated for phenotypic traits measured at the CCLONES 2 study.
Phenotypic Trait Broad Sense Heritability Standard Error
DBH 0.321 0.064
Short Term Oleoresin Yield 0.161 0.050
Long Term Oleoresin Yield 0.190 0.048
Long Term Oleoresin Yield with Covariates 0.194 0.049
Note: short-term oleoresin was collected in a 24-hour period and long-term oleoresin was collected over four months.
181
Table 5-5. Summary of main and interactive effects on long-term oleoresin yields at the CCLONES 2 site using the borehole tapping method in 2016 based on a general linear clonal model.
Effect DF Den DF F-statistic p-value
Replicate 3 175.7 5.45 0.002**
Tube Mass 1 832.8 0.04 0.619
DBH 1 698.9 125.40 <0.000**
DBH:Tube Mass 1 820.6 4.17 0.041
Note: P-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01. Tube mass represents short-term 24-hour oleoresin yield.
182
Table 5-6. Summary of variance components of genetic correlation between short-term and long-term oleoresin yield in the CCLONES 2 site.
Trait Variance Component Standard Error
Short-Term Oleoresin Yield 0.053 0.03
Long-Term Oleoresin Yield 1413.780 1068.89
Short- and Long-Term Oleoresin Yield 6.227 4.04
Note: short-term oleoresin was collected in a 24-hour period and long-term oleoresin was collected over four months.
183
Figure 5-1. Layout of the University of Florida’s CCLONES 2.
184
A
B Figure 5-2. Least square means with standard errors for oleoresin traits measured at
the CCLONES 2 study. A) Average short-term oleoresin yield. B) Average long-term oleoresin yield.
185
Figure 5-3. Bivariate fit of total long-term tree yield of oleoresin (g) in slash pine by DBH
(cm). The r2 for the linear relationship between DBH and average total tree yield is 0.785 (p-value <0.0001).
186
Figure 5-4. Bivariate fit of total long-term clonal mean oleoresin yield (g) in slash pine
by DBH (cm). The r2 for the linear relationship between DBH and average total tree yield is 0.378 (p-value 0.0147).
187
Figure 5-5. Bivariate fit of short-term tree yield of oleoresin (g) in slash pine by DBH
(cm). The r2 for the linear relationship between DBH and average short-term tree yield is 0.002 (p-value 0.7503).
188
Figure 5-6. Bivariate fit of short-term and long-term oleoresin yield (g). The r2 for the linear relationship between short-term tree yield and average long-term yield is 0.001 (p-value 0.4177).
189
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION
To maximize the value of forest plantations in the southeast U.S., the primary
focus of this research was to understand the effects of chemical and physical inducers,
and environmental and genetic effects on the flow and yield of oleoresin from slash pine
trees. The specific objectives of this research were: (1) to maximize collection and
recovery of oleoresin and increase terpene synthesis in slash pine for renewable
chemicals and biofuel production by testing different chemical stimulants, tapping
intensity, stand ages, and stand management practices, (2) to determine the optimal
methyl jasmonate dosage and carrier solvent that gives the greatest oleoresin yields in
the southeast U.S., and (3) to determine the genotypic and phenotypic correlations
between 24-hour resin flow with multi-month resin collection for genetic improvement in
oleoresin yields.
The borehole tapping method to collect oleoresin has numerous benefits
compared to other methods used around the world. This method only requires laborers
to visit the tree two times during a collection season, it yields better quality oleoresin
with less impurities and greater amounts of monoterpenes, reducing crystallization, and
this method allows landowners to maintain their stands for timber production without
damage to merchantable wood (Hodges, 1995).
In Chapter 3, the effects of stand management, tree characteristics, age, and
chemical stimulants on the yield of oleoresin in slash pine trees in North Florida were
examined. Overall, oleoresin yields increased with tree age; however, this increase was
positively correlated with tree size because age was not significant. Larger trees are
more productive and thus have a greater potential for producing oleoresin. Tapping
190
intensity was negatively correlated to oleoresin yield, which further supports tapping of
larger trees is preferred. Crown volume was not nearly as strong a predictor of oleoresin
yield compared to DBH. Hodges (1995) also concluded that canopy was not as good of
a predictor and inferred that oleoresin flow capacity from the borehole tapping method is
fixed.
Pine straw management had a significantly positive impact on oleoresin yields.
Active management, increased fertilization treatments, and reduced understory
competition all potentially play a role in increasing oleoresin yields observed in trees
tapped on a site managed for pine straw raking. Numerous questions on the effects of
soil nutrient availability on oleoresin productivity remain unanswered. Knebel et al.
(2008) observed an increase in oleoresin production in loblolly pines with fertilization.
Understanding how the soil nutrient limitations impact production in slash pine trees will
help frame silvicultural management regimes for plantations established to collect
oleoresin.
Across all sites and all ages, chemical stimulant was the most significant
predictor of oleoresin yields. Methyl jasmonate was the best inducer of oleoresin yields
tested in slash pine trees. The optimal tapping season length with the borehole tapping
method is a minimum of 120 days, with tapping occurring in the late spring/early
summer. In summary, when tapping young slash pine trees, aged 15 to 22, in the
southeastern U.S. using the borehole method, it is possible to collect on average 1 to
1.5 kg of oleoresin per tree.
In Chapter 4, the optimal and most sustainable treatment for increasing oleoresin
yields in slash pine trees was examined. As observed in Chapter 3, the application of
191
chemical stimulants was the most effective inducer of oleoresin yields. The dilution of
chemical inducers in ethanol as opposed to DI water and Tween 20 was beneficial. The
alcohol may allow methyl jasmonate to better penetrate the xylem, reduce the
crystallization rate within the borehole and help maintain the flow of the oleoresin. The
dose response experiments showed the benefit of increasing methyl jasmonate
concentration on oleoresin yield. The optimal concentration of methyl jasmonate to
induce oleoresin flow was 400 mM. With this increase in concentration it is possible to
collect close to 3.0 kg of oleoresin in 15-year-old slash pine trees, which would make
the operation economically viable.
Several variations of the borehole tapping method were tested, including six and
eight boreholes and smaller boreholes within larger ones (Appendix C). However, it was
found that the best tapping method is an automated system with three boreholes drilled
at the base of the tree all connecting to one collection borehole.
The automated method is less labor intensive and allows for a much larger
oleoresin collection operation. The average productivity for the manual drilling method
using the gas-powered drill to drill two boreholes was 26.7 trees per hour. On the other
hand, average productivity using the automated tapping method, which drills three
connected boreholes was significantly higher at 61 trees per hour. Further, the
estimated total cost per kg of oleoresin using the automated drilling technique is $1.29,
compared to $3.00 for the manual drilling method. Further, the most cost-effective
chemical stimulant treatment was the 400 mM methyl jasmonate diluted in 90% ethanol
which costs an estimated $1.21 per kg of oleoresin using the manual drilling technique.
These costs could be further reduced by tapping trees using the automated drilling
192
technique as opposed to manually. For commercial production, the most cost-effective
treatment in the southern U.S. is tapping slash pine stands using an automated drilling
machine and applying 400 mM of methyl jasmonate diluted in 90% ethanol.
Chapter 5 also examined the correlations between DBH and short-term oleoresin
yield on long-term production as well as the effects of genetics on short- and long-term
oleoresin flow. To do this, a slash pine clonal site (CCLONES 2) was tapped for short-
term flow and long-term yield using the borehole tapping method. DBH was found to
have a very strong positive correlation to long-term yield but was not correlated to short-
term yield. There was no significant bivariate phenotypic correlation between short-term
yield and long-term oleoresin yield; however, there was a strong positive genetic
correlation between the two phenotypic traits. The interaction between DBH and short-
term yield was a significant predictor of long-term yield. Comparing the average long-
term oleoresin yield between different slash pine families allows us to make selections
for higher gum oleoresin yielding families. In this study one family (521) had significantly
higher yields. Unlike other studies that found broad-sense heritability estimates of
oleoresin between 67 and 90%, this study calculated moderate to low broad-sense
heritabilities of 0.16 for short-term yield, 0.19 for long-term yield, and 0.194 of long-term
yield with covariates (Mergen et al., 1955; Squillace and Doman, 1959; Squillace and
Bengtson, 1961; Squillace, 1965). Nevertheless, it is still possible to make important
genetic gains from selections.
In conclusion, there is potential to reinvigorate oleoresin tapping and collection in
the U.S. Increasing overall productivity of southern pine stands, primarily slash pine,
through intensive management and selective breeding programs, will allow forest
193
landowners to increase their stand’s potential oleoresin productivity. Larger diameters
have a positive correlation to oleoresin yields. Slash pine trees should be stimulated
with a chemical inducer, preferably methyl jasmonate diluted in ethanol, to maximize
oleoresin yields.
The effect of soil nutrient availability on oleoresin yield in the southeast U.S.
remain unanswered. Understanding these impacts is important to maximize the
potential oleoresin productivity of a stand to reinvigorate the industry in the U.S. To
establish a commercial operation, it is imperative to identify areas for improvement in
the collection and processing method. Establishing a system to more efficiently collect,
process, and sort through the collection bags will allow for more trees to be sampled
and will decrease cost of labor.
Future studies should investigate the short- and long-term oleoresin flow and
yield in pseudo backcross loblolly and slash pine hybrids. Loblolly pines tend to be more
productive in terms of growth while slash pine is more productive in terms of oleoresin
flow. Since the pseudo backcross hybrids were found to be more growth efficient, they
may also have more productive oleoresin yields. Unfortunately, in this study the pseudo
backcross hybrid site sampled in Appendix 5 fell victim to a wildfire and we were unable
to sample short-term oleoresin flow.
While Squillace and Gansel (1974) found it possible to make growth and
productivity predictions for 25-year-old trees using 10-year-old progeny tests, questions
remain on the age-to-age correlation of oleoresin yield. Understanding age-age
correlations for short-term oleoresin yield in 5-year-old progeny tests to long-term yield
in 15 to 20-year-old stands will be important when making selections. Since the rotation
194
age for slash pine in the southeast U.S. is 20 to 25 years, finding a strong positive age
to age correlation for these oleoresin traits will allow tree breeders to make selections
for high yielding trees at a younger age, accelerating the rates of genetic gain. This will
then allow breeders to make second a third cycle selections to further improve the
oleoresin production in slash pine trees and establish plantations for collection and
timber.
195
APPENDIX A COMPARING OLEORESIN YIELD BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR INDIVIDUAL
SITES DURING THE 2013 TO 2015 TAPPING SEASONS
Table A-1. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 1 site during the 2013 tapping season. Stand age is 14 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 447.25 B
Ethephon 431.25 B
MeJa 844.49 A
MejaEthephon 923.50 A
Table A-2. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 1 site during
the 2013 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 392.47 B Ethephon 484.69 B
MeJa 903.46 A
MejaEthephon 954.87 A
Table A-3. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 2 site during
the 2013 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 394.01 C
Ethephon 507.53 C
MeJa 1059.01 A
MejaEthephon 762.05 B
Table A-4. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Bradford 1 site during
the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 11 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 431.77 C
Ethephon 522.35 C
MeJa 1104.25 A
MejaFeS 703.25 B
Table A-5. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 3 site during
the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 495.70 C
Ethephon 757.70 B
MeJa 641.77 B
MejaFeS 902.25 A
196
Table A-6. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 1 site during
the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 755.44 AB
Ethephon 843.25 A
MeJa 643.25 B
MejaFeS 779.62 AB
Table A-7. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 2 site during
the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 605.44 C
Ethephon 919.25 B
MeJa 1347.25 A
MejaFeS 805.44 B
Table A-8. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 4 site during
the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 772.06 C
Ethephon 1020.58 AB
MeJa 1089.45 A
MejaFeS 890.42 BC
Table A-9. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 5 site during
the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 598.48 B
Ethephon 679.62 B
MeJa 915.50 A
MejaFeS 1079.75 A
Table A-10. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Bradford 1 site
during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 12 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 289.13 C
Ethephon 411.04 BC
MeJa 490.07 B
MejaEthephon 959.31 A
197
Table A-11. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 3 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 481.71 C
Ethephon 377.89 C
MeJa 1029.74 A
MejaEthephon 773.73 B
Table A-12. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 1 site during
the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 460.00 B
Ethephon 468.08 B
MeJa 668.61 A
MejaEthephon 670.26 A
Table A-13. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Union 2 site during
the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 363.08 C
Ethephon 671.75 B
MeJa 852.00 A
MejaEthephon 788.13 AB
Table A-14. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 4 site
during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 513.56 B
Ethephon 563.92 AB
MeJa 383.09 C
MejaEthephon 662.41 A
Table A-15. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment in Alachua 5 site
during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 451.92 C
Ethephon 548.70 C
MeJa 1471.77 A
MejaEthephon 984.10 B
198
APPENDIX B
COMPARING OLEORESIN YIELD BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT AND IN TREE INJECTION FOR INDIVIDUAL SITES DURING THE 2014 AND 2015 TAPPING
SEASONS
Table B-1. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Bradford 1 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 11 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 452.00 D
Control/Injection 411.03 D
Ethephon 517.75 CD
Ethephon/Injection 526.83 BCD
MeJa 1075.25 A
Meja/Injection 1133.25 A
MejaFeS 717.50 B
MejaFeS/Injection 689.00 BC
Table B-2. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in
Alachua 3 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 500.75 D
Control/Injection 490.51 D
Ethephon 771.88 B
Ethephon/Injection 741.94 BC
MeJa 716.41 BC
Meja/Injection 569.00 CD
MejaFeS 1026.92 A
MejaFeS/Injection 783.66 B
Table B-3. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in
Union 1 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 841.03 ABC
Control/Injection 672.00 BC
Ethephon 721.75 BC
Ethephon/Injection 964.75 A
MeJa 623.25 C
Meja/Injection 663.25 BC
MejaFeS 673.85 BC
MejaFeS/Injection 885.38 ABC
199
Table B-4. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Union 2 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 15 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 646.75 C
Control/Injection 563.08 C
Ethephon 845.75 BC
Ethephon/Injection 992.75 B
MeJa 1338.75 A
Meja/Injection 1355.75 A
MejaFeS 839.52 BC
MejaFeS/Injection 766.76 BC
Table B-5. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in
Alachua 4 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 775.94 B
Control/Injection 768.06 B
Ethephon 1064.71 AB
Ethephon/Injection 977.71 AB
MeJa 1143.61 A
Meja/Injection 1036.76 AB
MejaFeS 941.94 AB
MejaFeS/Injection 837.43 AB
Table B-6. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in
Alachua 5 site during the 2014 tapping season. Stand age is 22 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 657.44 DE
Control/Injection 541.00 E
Ethephon 648.25 DE
Ethephon/Injection 711.79 CDE
MeJa 977.25 ABC
Meja/Injection 853.75 BCD
MejaFeS 1169.74 A
MejaFeS/Injection 992.00 AB
200
Table B-7. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Bradford 1 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 12 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 282.50 D
Control/Injection 295.75 D
Ethephon 415.13 CD
Ethephon/Injection 406.84 CD
MeJa 541.62 C
Meja/Injection 439.87 CD
MejaEthephon 1093.59 A
MejaEthephon/Injection 800.61 B
Table B-8. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Alachua 3 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 474.36 CD
Control/Injection 489.46 CD
Ethephon 378.16 D
Ethephon/Injection 377.63 D
MeJa 1075.90 A
Meja/Injection 983.59 A
MejaEthephon 860.26 AB
MejaEthephon/Injection 680.00 BC
Table B-9. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in
Union 1 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 484.05 BCD
Control/Injection 437.75 D
Ethephon 456.92 D
Ethephon/Injection 479.23 CD
MeJa 704.75 A
Meja/Injection 631.54 ABCD
MejaEthephon 675.75 AB
MejaEthephon/Injection 664.47 ABC
201
Table B-10. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in Union 2 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 16 years old. This stand was managed for pine straw raking.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 355.79 C
Control/Injection 370.00 C
Ethephon 699.50 AB
Ethephon/Injection 644.00 B
MeJa 842.75 AB
Meja/Injection 861.25 AB
MejaEthephon 878.25 A
MejaEthephon/Injection 698.00 AB
Table B-11. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in
Alachua 4 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 489.44 BCD
Control/Injection 537.03 ABC
Ethephon 612.31 AB
Ethephon/Injection 516.75 BCD
MeJa 355.37 D
Meja/Injection 411.50 CD
MejaEthephon 691.75 A
MejaEthephon/Injection 632.31 AB
Table B-12. Summary of oleoresin yields by chemical treatment and in tree injection in
Alachua 5 site during the 2015 tapping season. Stand age is 23 years old.
Chemical Treatment Mean Yield (g) Tukey Group
Control 462.75 C
Control/Injection 440.53 C
Ethephon 518.42 C
Ethephon/Injection 578.21 C
MeJa 1564.75 A
Meja/Injection 1376.41 A
MejaEthephon 1021.05 B
MejaEthephon/Injection 949.00 B
202
APPENDIX C SLASH PINE OLEORESIN TAPPING OPTIMIZATION TRIALS
Methods
Study Areas
Planted slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. Var. elliottii) stands between the ages
of 15 and 26 were selected from privately owned and managed companies in Alachua
and Union counties. Rayonier and Roberts Land & Timber Investment Corp. provided
the stands selected for this research. Throughout these experimental studies, four
stands were selected. All stands were managed using similar conventional silvicultural
practices including bedding, weed control, and fertilizer treatments. The criteria used to
select stands for tapping included: not easily accessed by the public, sufficient number
of trees available to tap, appropriate age, and appropriate thinning regime. Trees with
signs and symptoms of diseases such as fusiform rust (Cronartium fusiforme), pitch
canker (Fusarium circinatum), bark beetles, and pitch moth were not selected. Trees
with a diameter less than 12.7 cm, dead trees, and those damaged were not selected
for tapping.
Trees in these experimental studies were tapped from 2014 to 2015. The same
thinned 15-year-old slash pine stand in Alachua county was used for most of the
optimization experiments. This slash pine experimental site is located just outside of
Gainesville, Florida (29°46’N latitude and 82°18’W longitude) at an elevation 51 meters
from average sea level. An additional thinned 15-year-old slash pine stand in Alachua
County was selected for the 2014 six boreholes and six borehole match experimental
study. This site is also located just outside of Gainesville, Florida (29°43’N latitude and
82°17’W longitude) at an elevation 48 meters from average sea level.
203
We compared the yield of oleoresin from a site identified as planted with high
gum trees to a non-high gum stand. These two 26-year-old stands were in Union
county. The 26-year-old non-high gum experimental site is in Lake Butler, Florida
(30°03’N latitude and 82°22’W longitude) at an elevation 41 meters from average sea
level. The stand that did not have the high gum selection was also managed for cattle
grazing, was planted at a lower density, and contained very little understory competition.
The stand with the high gum selection contained more woody and non-woody
understory vegetation.
The climate at all study sites was humid subtropical with hot wet summers and
mild dry winters, and the topography was primarily flat with a 1-2% slope. The soils in
the study sites ranged from poorly drained to moderately well drained. The understory
vegetation varied throughout the different sites. The 26-year-old high gum stand had a
thick understory, while the 26-year-old non-high gum stand had a clear understory. The
two sites in Gainesville, Florida had a mild understory. Understory vegetation included
Table C-2. Chemical treatment and improved genetic effects on average oleoresin yield per tree (kg) from slash pine trees using the standard borehole tapping method in 2014.
Chemical Treatment Genetically Improved Not Genetically Improved (High Gum)
Control (no chemical) 1.258b 1.027b
Ethephon 1.262b 1.188b
Methyl Jasmonate 2.087a 2.405a
Methyl Jasmonate/Ethephon 1.847a 2.124a
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
223
Table C-3. Summary of main and interactive effect on oleoresin yields in high gum and non-high gum site based on a general linear model.
Effect DF Den DF F-statistic p-value
Chemical 3 296 41.87 <0.000**
DBH 1 296 6.43 0.003*
Site 1 296 3.61 0.051
Site:Treatment 3 296 2.35 0.025*
Site:DBH 1 296 0.62 0.346
Treatment:DBH 3 296 1.18 0.319
Site:Treatment:DBH 3 296 0.34 0.795
Note: P-values with * superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.05, while p-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01.
224
Table C-4. DBH, height, crown volume, and effect of chemical stimulant on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the big-small borehole tapping method.
Chemical Treatment DBH(cm) Tree Height (m) Crown Volume (m3) Oleoresin Yield (kg)
Average SE Average SE Average SE Average SE Control (no chemcial) 22.66a 0.26 20.32a 0.21 47.77a 3.60 0.530b 0.05
Ethephon 22.44 a 0.21 20.02a 0.20 47.48a 3.40 0.550b 0.04 MeJa 22.52 a 0.23 19.99a 0.22 49.12a 4.06 1.303a 0.08
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05). The notations MeJa and MeJaE, respectively represent the chemical treatments methyl jasmonate and methyl jasmonate combined with ethephon.
225
Table C-5. Summary of main and interactive effect on oleoresin yields in site drilled using the big-small borehole tapping method based on a general linear model.
Effect DF Den DF F-statistic p-value
Treatment 1 285 18.94 <0.000**
Chemical 3 285 82.56 <0.000**
DBH 1 285 30.59 <0.000**
Height 1 285 4.83 0.041*
Crown Volume 1 285 13.67 0.65
Treatment:DBH 1 285 7.90 0.07
Treatment:Chemical 3 285 1.54 0.15
Treatment:Crown Volume 1 285 0.37 0.36
Treatment:Height 1 285 0.23 0.84
Chemical:DBH 3 285 1.96 0.11
Chemical:Crown Volume 3 285 0.41 0.58
Chemical:Height 3 285 1.57 0.18
DBH:Crown Volume 1 285 0.01 0.59
DBH:Height 1 285 0.39 0.89
Height:Crown Volume 1 285 0.80 0.37
Note: P-values with * superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.05, while p-values with ** superscripts are significant based on a test with p-value <0.01.
226
Table C-6. Effects of tapping treatment, DBH, height and crown volume on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the triple borehole (two inner holes) tapping method and stimulated by methyl jasmonate.
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
227
Table C-7. Effects of chemical stimulant and DBH on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the opposing side borehole tapping method. The following were the chemical stimulants: control, methyl jasmonate (MeJa). methyl jasmonate and paraquat (MeJaP), methyl jasmonate and paraquat paste (MeJaPPs), methyl jasmonate paste (MeJaPs), and paraquat.
Chemical Treatment DBH(cm) Oleoresin Yield (kg)
Average SE Average SE Control (no chemical) 21.667a 0.56 0.527b 0.04
MeJa 21.642a 0.61 0.757a 0.06 MeJaP 21.156a 0.51 0.641ab 0.05
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
228
Table C-8. Effects of chemical stimulant and number of boreholes on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the automated borehole tapping method.
Holes
2 3
Chemical Treatment Average SE Average SE MeJa NA NA 1.061b 0.03
MeJaE 1.475a 0.05 1.493a 0.04
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05). The notations MeJa and MeJaE, respectively represent the chemical treatments methyl jasmonate and methyl jasmonate combined with ethephon.
229
Table C-9. Effects of chemical stimulant and DBH on total oleoresin yield (kg) and oleoresin yield per borehole (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the 6 borehole and standard borehole tapping method.
Treatment DBH(cm) Oleoresin Yield (kg) Oleoresin Yield per Borehole (kg)
Average SE Average SE Average SE Two Boreholes 20.619a 0.36 0.946b 0.10 0.473a 0.02 Six Boreholes 19.958a 0.25 1.526a 0.07 0.254b 0.02
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
230
Table C-10. Effects of chemical stimulant on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2014 using the 8-borehole tapping method.
Chemical Treatment Oleoresin Yield (kg)
Average SE Control (no chemical) 0.770b 0.06
Ethephon 0.808b 0.06 Methyl Jasmonate 1.071a 0.06
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
231
Table C-11. Effects of chemical stimulant, DBH, height and crown volume on oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees in 2015 using the 8-borehole tapping method.
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05). The notations MeJa and MeJaE, respectively represent the chemical treatments methyl jasmonate and methyl jasmonate combined with ethephon.
232
Table C-12. Effects of number of boreholes on tapping intensity and oleoresin yield (kg) when tapping slash pine trees using the 6 and 8 borehole taping method.
Number of Boreholes Tapping Intensity Oleoresin Yield (kg)
Average SE Average SE
Two 11.066c 0.32 0.945b 0.07
Six 35.052b 0.72 1.526a 0.08
Eight 40.152a 1.26 1.708a 0.13
Note: The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05). Tapping intensity is calculated based on the cross-sectional area tapped at the base of the tree. The model for the 6-borehole method is shown in Figure C-2 and the model for the 2-borehole method is shown in Figure 3-1.
233
Table C-13. Summary of optimization treatments, number of boreholes, collection days, chemical inducers and oleoresin yields.
Experiment Stand Age
Number of Boreholes
Collection Days
Chemical Mean Oleoresin
Yield (kg)
Automated Drilling
15 3 155 MeJa 1.061
15 3 155 MeJaE 1.493
15 2 155 MeJaE 1.475
High Gum
26 2 176 Control 1.258
26 2 176 Ethephon 1.262
26 2 176 MeJa 2.087
26 2 176 MeJaE 1.847
Non-High Gum
26 2 176 Control 1.027
26 2 176 Ethephon 1.188
26 2 176 MeJa 2.405
26 2 176 MeJaE 2.124
Opposing Side
15 2 96 Control 0.527
15 2 96 MeJa 0.757
15 2 96 MeJaP 0.641
15 2 96 MeJaPPs 0.621
15 2 96 MeJaPs 0.754
15 2 96 Paraquat 0.519
2014 8 Borehole
15 8 99 Control 0.77
15 8 99 Ethephon 0.808
15 8 99 MeJa 1.071
2014 6 Borehole
15 6 167 MeJa 1.129
15 6 169 MeJa 1.944
15 6 172 MeJa 1.723
15 6 174 MeJa 1.848
2014 6 Boreholes Match
15 2 178 MeJa 0.946
3 Hole Test 16 1 120 MeJa 0.758
16 3 120 MeJa 1.341
Big-Small
16 2 94 Control 0.529
16 2 94 Ethephon 0.55
16 2 94 MeJa 1.303
16 2 94 MeJaE 1.084
2015 8 Borehole
16 8 103 Control 0.906
16 8 103 Ethephon 0.848
16 8 103 MeJa 1.708
16 8 103 MeJaE 1.005
Alcohol 16 2 97 Alcohol 1.507
16 2 97 Tween 0.936
234
Table C-14. Estimated cost per tree of borehole tapping method to collect oleoresin. Calculated costs are based on
productivity rates of tapping 26.7 trees per hour for the manual drilling and 61 trees per hour for the automated drilling. Adapted from Hodges and Ferguson (2011).
Manual Drilling Automated Drilling
Cost Category / Item Quantity per tree
Units Unit Price
Cost per Tree
Quantity per tree
Units Unit Price Cost per
Tree
Supplies
Spouts: 1 x 5 in. PVC pipe, or custom molded PE
2 Ea. $0.150 $0.300 1 Ea. $0.150 $0.150
Collection bags, Nylon/PE laminate, 6x20 in.
2 Ea. $0.090 $0.180 1 Ea. $0.090 $0.090
Cable ties for bag closure 2 Ea. $0.010 $0.020 1 Ea. $0.010 $0.010 Plugs for machine-drilled boreholes 2 Ea. $0.037 $0.073 Ethephon, 55% active ingredient 2 Dose $0.026 $0.052 3 Dose $0.026 $0.079 Methyl jasmonate – 100 mM 2 Dose $0.138 $0.276 3 Dose $0.138 $0.414 Distilled water 2 Dose $0.001 $0.002 3 Dose $0.001 $0.002 Diesel fuel for drill machine and utility vehicle
0.050 Gal. $3.00 $0.150 0.075 Gal. $3.50 $0.263
Gasoline and oil for power drill 0.004 Gal. $4.50 $0.019
Subtotal supplies $1.00 $1.081
Labor
Borehole Treatment/Installation (3-man crew, average productivity rate)
0.163 Hr. $8.50 $1.388 0.050 Hr. $8.50 $0.422
Oleoresin harvesting (3-man crew, average productivity)
0.017 Hr. $8.50 $0.143 0.017 Hr. $8.50 $0.143
Subtotal labor $1.530 $0.565
Note: Equipment costs depreciated over useful life of 250,000 trees; does not include highway transportation equipment. The cost of 1 kg of methyl jasmonate from Bedoukian Research is $3080.
Note: Equipment costs depreciated over useful life of 250,000 trees; does not include transportation equipment. The cost of 1 kg of methyl jasmonate from Bedoukian Research is $3080.
236
Figure C-1. Diagrams of borehole tapping designs. A) Standard boreholes drilled
manually with a gas-powered drill. B) Standard boreholes drilled manually on opposite sides of the tree. C) Boreholes drilled using a tractor mounted automated system, (d) borehole drilled manually with two shallower wide holes and two longer holes drilled with a 0.9525 cm drill bit. E) Six boreholes drilled manually in two levels, the black-marked holes drilled at the base and the grey-marked holes drilled 10.16 cm higher. F) Eight boreholes drilled manually in two levels, the black-marked holes drilled at the base and the grey-marked holes drilled 10.16 cm higher. G) Three borehole system drilled manually with one central borehole and two interior boreholes. All boreholes were drilled using a 2.54 cm drill bit; apart from the longer borehole in D which was drilled using a 0.9525 cm drill bit, the central borehole in the automated system (B) which was drilled with a 3.175 cm bit and the boreholes in the triple borehole experiment (G) which had a counterbore drilled with a 3.175 cm bit and a 2.54 cm drill bit.
237
Figure C-2. Calculations for the cross-sectional tapping area and individual hole area
model for the trees tapped using the 8-borehole method. c is the center of the tree, r is the radius calculated using the predicted stump diameter, bd represents the borehole depth, and bw represents the borehole width. The tapping area is the triangle c-y-x. This diagram is also used to calculate tapping area intensity using the 6-borehole method.
238
Figure C-3. Chemical effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping
slash pine trees in 2015 using the standard method and the big-small tapping method. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
239
Figure C-4. Chemical effects on oleoresin yield (kg) with standard errors when tapping
slash pine trees in North Florida in 2014 using the automated drilling technique. The means with different letter superscripts were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
240
Figure C-5. Predicted cumulative flow of oleoresin (g) by chemical treatment since day
of tapping treatment at the 2014 8 borehole test. The following equations correspond to the oleoresin flow when trees are stimulated by the different treatments: control: y = 802.529 * (1 – 0.911 e-0.032D; r2 = 0.98); ethephon: y = 836.953 * (1 – 0.922 e-0.033D; r2 = 0.98); methyl jasmonate: y = 1108.968 * (1 – 0.991 e-0.035D; r2 = 0.99). Where y corresponds to oleoresin yield (g) and D corresponds to number of days since treatment.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Ole
ore
sin
Yie
ld (
g)
Day Since Treatment
Control Ethephon Methyl Jasmonate
241
Figure C-6. Bivariate fit of total tree oleoresin yield (kg) in slash pine by tapping
intensity using the 6 and 8 borehole methods. The r2 for the linear relationship between tapping intensity and average total tree yield is 0.148 (p-value 0.0022).
242
APPENDIX D PSEUDO BACKCROSS HYBRID STUDY
Introduction
The two primary conifer species planted in the southeast United States for timber
production and pulpwood are slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. Var. elliottii) and loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda L.). The two species have some distinct phenotypic and growth
differences. Forestry companies tend to prefer planting loblolly pine, which accounts for
120,000 km2 of land, as it usually responds better to nutrition management and
intensive silvicultural treatments yielding greater total volume at earlier ages (Xiao et al.,
2003). During early developmental stages, loblolly pine is more productive compared to
slash pine (Xiao et al., 2003). While loblolly pine outperforms slash pine, slash pine
grows better on very poorly drained sites (Borders and Harrison, 1989). Compared to
slash pine, loblolly allocates more biomass to crown production, and thus tends to have
more primary and secondary branching and larger crown widths (Xiao et al., 2003). As a
result, compared to slash pine, loblolly pine tends to have a higher leaf area and poorer
stem form caused by the higher number of branches (Xiao et al., 2003; Muñoz Del Valle
et al., 2011). The allocation of biomass to crown development in loblolly pine promotes
increased tree size (Xiao et al., 2003). Furthermore, slash pine is less resistant to
fusiform rust (Cronartium quercuum), a fungal disease that can be fatal to pine trees,
but is more resistant to wind damage (Muñoz Del Valle et al., 2011).
Methods
Study Area
In January 2013, the CFGRP and FBRC established the pseudo backcross
hybrid study. This study is located at the Murphree Well Field protection area in
243
northeast Gainesville, Florida (29°44’50.0” N, 82°19’44.5”W). The study area is owned
and managed by the Weyerhaeuser Company (formerly Plum Creek Timber Company),
and was established to evaluate the performance of progeny and identify beneficial
backcross hybrids for tree improvement programs.
In September 2012, the site was raked and double bedded, and prior to planting
the site received a broadcast application of 48 ounces of Chopper. The site was then
planted in January 2013, and following a 6-week survival check, dead trees were
replaced with replants in March 2013. Following planting, release herbicide treatment of
13 ounces of Oustar were applied using broadcast application in May 2013 and hand
application of 100 gallons of roundup with 6 ounces per gallon in June 2014. The site
was fertilized using a hand broadcast at five feet around each tree between late May
and early June 2014. Replicate 1 received a low treatment of 200# per acre DAP and
replicate 2 received a high treatment of 500# per acre 10-10-10 with micronutrients.
Finally, the site received a herbicide treatment of 48 ounces garlon and 64 ounces
glyphosate per acre.
The study location has a humid subtropical climate with hot wet summers and
mild dry winters, and the topography was flat with a slope between 0 and 2%. The study
was established on a somewhat poorly drained site and the dominant soil series was
Newnan. The Newnan series is a Spodosol and is classified as a sandy, siliceous,
hyperthermic Oxyaquic (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1993a). The
understory vegetation included saw palmetto (Serenoa repens (B.) Small.), blackberries
At the FBRC and CFGRP’s backcross hybrid stand, several full-sib families were
compared for various growth traits. The pure slash pine trees in this study had wider
stem diameters. Compared to loblolly pine trees, slash pine allocates more dry matter to
stem wood and stem bark (Colbert et al. 1990). Surprisingly, the average crown size in
the pure slash pine trees was significantly larger than all the other families. Although it is
well documented that loblolly pine tends to have larger crowns than slash pine (Xiao et
al., 2003), it may not be the case for very young trees. Loblolly and pseudo backcross
loblolly trees were found to have on average more primary and secondary branches. In
their study, Colbert et al. (1990) reported a greater dry matter partitioning to crown
foliage and branches in loblolly pine compared to slash pine. These inter-whorl
branches allow loblolly pine to more efficiently intercept light and reduces self-shading
at higher leaf areas, which would make them more productive at higher densities
(Colbert et al. 1990). However, at lower planting densities with lower leaf areas, slash
pine is more productive than loblolly pine (Colbert et al. 1990). The loblolly pine pseudo
249
backcross showed signs of hybrid vigor as it had more primary branches and was taller
than all other families, including the pure slash and pure loblolly.
Muñoz Del Valle et al. (2011) and Lopez-Upton et al. (1999), reported that
loblolly pine tends to be less susceptible to fusiform rust compared to slash pine,
although certain families in both species are more resistant. However, in our study,
overall rust occurrence was low, but the pseudo backcross loblolly family had 9.0% of
trees infected with a branch or stem rust gall. This may be due to the higher rate of
these seedlings having nurse rust prior to planting. The narrow-sense heritability
estimates for most of the growth traits at age 3 were relatively low as reported in many
other studies (Lopez-Upton et al., 1999; Li et al., 2007). The heritability estimates for the
number of primary branches and the number of secondary branches at node 5 were the
highest.
250
Table D-1. Summary of genotypes planted in each replicate of the CFGRP pseudo backcross hybrid study.
Family # Individuals Replicate 1 # Individuals Replicate 2 Total # Individuals
2904 x 22056 615 604 1219
2904 x OP 99 99 198
Filler 135 150 285
2904 x E63 407 381 788
E63 x Mix 246 254 500
Lob x OP 208 222 430
Grand Total 1710 1710 3420
251
Table D-2. Least square means with standard errors for phenotypic traits measured at the pseudo-backcross hybrid study. Pure slash and loblolly pine families are SSSS and LLLL, respectively, and backcross hybrids with slash and loblolly are (SSSL 1 and 2, and SLLL, respectively.
Table D-3. Tukey significance group letters of the least square means for phenotypic traits (alpha < 0.05) recorded in Table D-2. Pure slash and loblolly pine families were measured (SSSS and LLLL, respectively), as well as backcross hybrids with slash and loblolly (SSSL and SLLL, respectively).
Year 3 Measurements
SSSS SSSL 1 SSSL 2 SLLL LLLL
Height (m) BC C B A BC
DBH (cm) A B A A AB
Crown (m) A C B B BC
Primary Branch C B B A B
Primary Branch Node 3 C A BC AB AB
Secondary Branch Node 3 D B C A AB
Primary Branch Node 5 C BC AB AB A Secondary Branch Node 5 D B C A A
Note: The different Tukey group letters were significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test (p-value <0.05).
253
Table D-4. Disease and mortality observed at the end of the 3rd growing season in the two replicate treatments of the pseudo-backcross hybrid. Pure slash and loblolly pine families were measured (SSSS and LLLL, respectively), as well as backcross hybrids with slash and loblolly (SSSL and SLLL, respectively). Replicate 1 represents the operational fertilization treatment, while replicate 2 represents the higher intensity fertilization. The top line in each family represents disease at mortality in both replicate plots.
Disease and Mortality Status by Environment
Family Rust Rust Mortality Pitch Moth Mortality
SLLL 8.97% 0.06% 1.73% 0.47%
Replicate 1 4.06% 0.06% 0.94% 0.18%
Replicate 2 4.91% 0% 0.79% 0.29%
SSSL1 1.17% 0% 0.32% 0.21%
Replicate 1 0.56% 0% 0.12% 0.12%
Replicate 2 0.61% 0% 0.20% 0.09%
SSSL2 2.96% 0.03% 1.72% 2.08%
Replicate 1 1.67% 0.03% 0.73% 0.99%
Replicate 2 1.29% 0% 0.99% 1.08%
SSSS 2.46% 0.18% 1.17% 0.44%
Replicate 1 1.11% 0.12% 0.56% 0.18%
Replicate 2 1.35% 0.06% 0.61% 0.26%
LLLL 0.56% 0% 0.42% 0.20%
Replicate 1 0.15% 0% 0.23% 0.00%
Replicate 2 0.41% 0% 0.18% 0.20%
Study Means 16.12% 0.27% 5.36% 3.39%
254
Table D-5. Percentage of trees with stem form issues at the end of the 3rd growing season in the pseudo-backcross hybrid study. Pure slash and loblolly pine families were measured (SSSS and LLLL, respectively), as well as backcross hybrids with slash and loblolly (SSSL and SLLL, respectively). Replicate 1 represents the operational fertilization treatment, while replicate 2 represents the higher intensity fertilization. The top line in each family represents stem form in both replicate plots.
Stem Form by Environment
Family None Forking Ramicorn Branching Both
SLLL 11.38% 5.55% 15.69% 5.74%
Replicate 1 6.12% 2.81% 7.97% 2.52%
Replicate 2 5.26% 2.74% 7.72% 3.22%
SSSL1 2.63% 0.84% 2.30% 0.42%
Replicate 1 1.44% 0.48% 1.02% 0.16%
Replicate 2 1.18% 0.35% 1.28% 0.26%
SSSL2 13.01% 3.12% 5.96% 0.86%
Replicate 1 6.12% 1.53% 3.70% 0.57%
Replicate 2 6.89% 1.59% 2.26% 0.29%
SSSS 9.57% 1.44% 4.08% 0.26%
Replicate 1 4.88% 0.67% 1.88% 0.13%
Replicate 2 4.69% 0.77% 2.20% 0.13%
LLLL 5.59% 1.59% 5.45% 0.86%
Replicate 1 2.78% 0.89% 2.55% 0.41%
Replicate 2 2.81% 0.70% 2.90% 0.45%
Study Means 42.18% 12.54% 33.48% 8.14%
255
Table D-6. Narrow sense heritability estimates calculated for phenotypic traits measured at the end of the 3rd growing season in the pseudo-backcross hybrid study.
Year 3 Measurements
Phenotypic Trait Narrow Sense Heritability Standard Error
Height 0.094 0.058
DBH 0.046 0.043
Crown 0.102 0.065
Primary Branch 0.194 0.071
Primary Branch Node 3 0.059 0.055
Secondary Branch Node 3 0.133 0.050
Primary Branch Node 5 0.100 0.063
Secondary Branch Node 5 0.195 0.070
256
Figure D-1. Pedigree of the genotypes planted in the pseudo backcross hybrid study using a Latinized row-column design.
257
Figure D-2. Layout of the pseudo backcross hybrid study using a Latinized row-column design.
258
Figure D-3. Codes used for the pseudo backcross hybrid study. Part A shows the tree status codes and part B shows the stem form codes.
259
LIST OF REFERENCES
Aguiar, A.V.D., Shimizu, J.Y., Sousa, V.A.D., Resende, M.D.V.D., Freitas, M.L.M., Moraes, M.L.T.D., Sebbenn, A.M., 2012. Genetics of oleoresin production with focus on Brazilian planted forests. Fett-Neto, A.G., Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C.S. (Eds.), Pine Resin: Biology, Chemistry and Applications, pp. 87-106.
Allen, C.D., Macalady, A.K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D.D., Hogg, E.H., Gonzalez, P., Fensham, R., Zhang, Z., Castro, J., Demidova, N., Lim, J-H., Allard, G., Running, S.W., Semerci, A., Cobb, N., 2010. A global view of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 660-684.
American Chemistry Council, 2011. The economic benefits of the pine chemical industry. Economic and Statistics Department. URL https://pinechemistry.americanchemistry.com/Pine-Chemistry-Basics/Learn-about-the-Economic-Benefits-of-Pine-Chemistry.pdf.
Bailey, R.L., 1994. A compatible volume-taper model based on the Schumacher and Hall generalized constant form factor volume equation. Forest Science 40, 303-313.
Barranx, A., de Laporterie, V., de la Sauzay, B., Lauilhe, J.P., Vidal, A., 2002. Method for collecting products secreted by trees, collecting bag and activating product for implementing said method, US Patent 6,453,604 B1.
Belcher, B., and Schreckenberg, K., 2007. Commercialization of non-timber forest products: a reality check. Development Policy Review 25, 355-377.
Bentz, B.J., Régnière, J., Fettig, C.J., Hansen, M., Hayes, J.L., Hicke, J.A., Kelsey, R.G., Negrón, Seybold, S.J., 2010. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience 60, 602-613.
Bhat, S.S., 2015. Genetic analysis for growth and oleoresin traits of chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent). Doctoral Dissertation. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry.
Bleecker, A.B., and Kende, H., 2000. Ethylene: a gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 16, 1-18.
Bohlmann, J., and Keeling, C.I., 2008. Terpenoid biomaterials. The Plant Journal 54, 656-669.
Borak, B., Ort, D.R., and Burbaum, J.J., 2013. Energy and carbon accounting to compare bioenergy crops. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 24, 369-375.
Borders, B.E., and Harrison, W.M., 1989. Comparison of slash pine and loblolly pine performance on cutover site-prepared sites in the coastal plain of Georgia and Florida. South. J. Appl. For. 13, 204-207.
Burns, R.M., Honkala, B.H., 1990. Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. vol.2, 877 p. URL https://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual/volume_1/silvics_vol1.pdf.
Cannac, M., Barboni, T., Ferrat, L., Bighelli, A., Castola, V., Costa, J., Trecul, D., Morandini, F., Pasqualini, V., 2009. Oleoresin flow and chemical composition of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra subsp. laricio) in response to prescribed burnings. Forest Ecology and Management 257, 1247-1254.
Cheong, J.J., Choi, Y.D., 2003. Methyl jasmonate as a vital substance in plants. Trends in Genetics 19, 409-413.
Christiansen, E., Krokene, P., Berrymand, A.A., Franceschi, V.R., Krekling, T., Lieutier, F., Lönneborg, A., Solheim, H., 1999. Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 19, 399-403.
Clements, R.W., 1970. Front and back face gum yields from 2,4-D and H2SO4 treatments on slash pine. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Note 132, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina.
Colbert, S.R., Jokela, E.J., and Neary, DG. 1990. Effects of annual fertilization and sustained weed control on dry matter partitioning, leaf area, and growth efficiency of juvenile loblolly and slash pine. Forest Science 36, 995-1014.
Conners, T.E., Ingram, L.L., Su, W., Banerjee, S., Dalton, A.T., Templeton, M.C., Diehl, S.V., 1999. Seasonal variation in southern pine terpenes. IPST Technical Paper Series Number 828. pp. 1-11.
Coppen, J.J.W., 1995. Turpentine from Pine Resin. In C. Chandrasekharan, Flavours and fragrances of plant origin (pp. 65-80). Rome, Italy. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Coppen, J.J.W., Hone, G.A., 1995. Gum naval stores: turpentine and rosin from pine resin. Natural Resources Institute. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Cunningham, A., 2012. Pine resin tapping techniques used around the world. Fett-Neto, A.G., Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C.S. (Eds.), Pine Resin: Biology, Chemistry and Applications, pp. 1-8.
Cunningham, A. 2014. Advocating for a sustainable pine tapping practice. 2014 PCA International Conference. Seattle, WA. URL http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.pinechemicals.org/resource/collection/C9836B4C-DDF1-4725-82D5-AAA0E89C2311/Alex_Cunningham_-_Advocating_for_a_sustainable_pibe_tapping_practice.pdf.
da Silva Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C., de Lima, J.C., Fett-Neto, A.G., 2013. Oleoresins from Pine: Production and Industrial Uses. In: Ramawat, K.G., Mérillon, J.-M. (Eds.), Natural Products: Phytochemistry, Botany and Metabolism of Alkaloids, Phenolics and Terpenes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 4037-4060.
Davis, T.S. Jarvis, K., Hofstetter, R.W., 2011. Oleoresin exudation quantity increases and viscosity declines following a fire event in a Ponderosa pine ecosystem. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 43, 6-11.
De Lima, J.C., de Costa, F., Füller, T.N., Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C.S., Kerber, M.R., Lima, M.S., Fett, J.P., Fett-Neto, A.G., 2016. Reference genes for qPCR analysis in resin-tapped adult slash pine as a tool to address the molecular basis of commercial resinosis. Frontiers Plant Science 7, 1-13.
Dickens, D.E., Moorhead, D.J., Bargeron, C.T., McElvany, B.C., 2011. Pine straw yields and economic benefits when added to traditional wood products in loblolly, longleaf, and slash pine stands. University of Georgia Warnell Outreach Publications. General Forestry. PDF. URL https://www.warnell.uga.edu/outreach/pubs/forestry.php#gf.
Duryea, M.L., 1989. Pine straw management in Florida’s forests. University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension. PDF. CIR831. URL http://www.ntfpinfo.us/docs/other/Duryea2000-PineStrawManagementFloridaForests.pdf.
Eisenbies, M.H., E.D. Vance, W.M. Aust, J.R. Seiler., 2009. Intensive utilization of harvest residues in southern pine plantations: quantities available and implications for nutrient budgets and sustainable site productivity. Bioenergy. Res. 2, 90-98.
Endara, M. J., Coley, P. D., 2011. The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta-analysis. Functional Ecology 25, 389-398.
Faccoli, M. Schlyter, F., 2007. Conifer phenolic resistance markers are bark beetle antifeedant semiochemicals. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 9, 237-245.
Fahn, A., 1988. Secretory tissues in vascular plants. New Phytologist 108, 229-257.
Fahn, A., Werker, E., Ben-Tzur, P., 1979. Seasonal effects of wounding and growth substances on development of traumatic resin ducts in Cedrus libani. New Phytologist 82, 537-544.
FAO Non Wood Forest Products Database. Rome, Italy: Forest Economics, Policy, and Products Division. Non wood forest products [updated January 24 2014, cited July 14 2016]. URL http://www.fao.org/forestry/nwfp/78836/en/chn/.
Farjon, A., 2013a. Pinus massoniana. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013 :eT42379A2976356. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T42379A2976356.en.
Farjon, A., 2013b. Pinus caribaea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: eT42348A2974430. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T42348A2974430.en.
Ferrenberg, S. Kane, J. M., Mitton, J. B., 2014. Resin duct characteristics associated with tree resistance to bark beetles across lodgepole and limber pines. Oecologia 174, 1283-1292.
FBRC (Forest Biology Research Cooperative)., 2002. "Study Plan: Slash Pine CCLONES (Comparing Clonal Lines On Experimental Sites)" FBRC Report #18 (FBRC, 2002).
Fox, T.R., Jokela, E.J., Allen, H.L., 2007. The Development of Pine Plantation
Silviculture in the Southern United States. Journal of Forestry 105, 337-347.
Franceschi, V.R., Krekling, T., Berryman, A.A., Christiansen, E., 1998. Specialized phloem parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Pinaceae) bark are an important sit of defense reactions. American Journal of Botany 85, 601-615.
Franceschi, V.R., Krekling, T., Christiansen, E., 2002. Application of methyl jasmonate on Picea abies (Pinaceae) stems induces defense-related responses in phloem and xylem. American Journal of Botany 89, 578-586.
Franceschi, V.R., Krokene, P., Krekling, T., Christiansen, E., 2000. Phloem Parenchyma cells are involved in local and distant defense responses to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 87, 314-326.
Franklin, E. C., Taras, M. A., Volkman, D. A., 1970. Genetic gains in yields of oleoresin: wood extractive and tall oil. Tappi 53, 2302-2304.
Frederick, Jr. W.J., Lien, S.J., Courchene, C.E., DeMartini, N.A., Ragauskas, A.J., Lisa, K., 2008a. Co-production of ethanol and cellulose fiber from southern pine: a technical and economic assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy 32, 1293-1302.
Frederick, Jr. W.J., Lien, S.J., Courchene, C.E., DeMartini, N.A., Ragauskas, A.J., Lisa, K., 2008b. Production of ethanol from carbohydrates from loblolly pine: A technical and economic assessment. Bioresoucre Technology 99, 5051-5057.
Gan, J., 2004. Risk and damage of southern pine beetle outbreaks under global climate change. Forest Ecology and Management 191, 61-71.
Gansel, C.R., 1965. Inheritance of stem and branch characters in slash pine in relation to gum yield. Proc. 8th South. Conf. Forest Tree Improvement. pp. 63-67.
Gaylord, M.L., Kolb, T.E., Wallin, K.F., Wagner, M.R., 2007. Seasonal dynamics of tree growth, physiology, and resin defenses in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37, 1173-1183.
Gillis, J., 2013, December 1. In New Jersey Pines, Trouble Arrives on Six Legs. The New York Times. URL http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/02/science/earth/in-new-jersey-pines-trouble-arrives-on-six-legs.html.
Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B., Cullis, B., Thompson, R., 2009. ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
Goldemberg, J., 2007. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 315, 808-810.
Goldemberg, J., 2008. The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnology for Biofuels 1, 1-7.
Hadiyane, A., Sulistyawati, E., Asharina, W.P., Dungani, R., 2015. A study on production of resin from Pinus merkusii Jungh. Et De Vriese in the Bosscha observatory area, west Java-Indonesia. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 14, 89-93.
Häggman, H., Raybould, A., Borem, A., Fox, T., Handley, L., Hertzberg, M., Lu, M., Macdonald, P., Oguchi, T., Pasquali, G., Pearson, L., Peter, G.F., Quemada, H., Séguin, A., Tattersall, K., Ulian, E., Walter, C., McLean, M., 2013. Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment. Plant Biotechnology Journal 11, 785-798.
Harper, V.L., 1944. Effects of fire on gum yields of longleaf and slash pines. USDA Circular No. 710, Washington, D.C.
Harrington, T.A., 1969. Production of oleoresin from southern pine trees. Forest Products Journal 19, 31-36.
Harris, P., 1960. Production of pine resin and its effect on survival of Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 38, 121-130.
Harvey BG, Wright ME, Quintana RL., 2010. High-density renewable fuels based on the selective dimerization of pinenes. Energy & Fuels 24, 267–273.
Helseth, F.A., Brown, C.L., 1970. A system for continuously monitoring oleoresin exudation pressure in slash pine. Forest Science 16, 346-349.
Herms, D. A., Mattson, W. J., 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67, 283-335.
Hinchee, M., Rottman, W., Mullinax, L., Zhang, C., Chang, S., Cunningham, M., Pearson, L., Nehra, N., 2011. Chapter 8 Short-rotation woody crops for bioenergy and biofuels applications. Biofuels: global impact on renewable energy, production agriculture, and technological advancements. Tomes, D., Songstad, D., Lakshmanan, P. (Eds.). New York, NY: Springer Science.
Hodges, A.W., 1995. Management strategies for a borehole resin production system in slash pine. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florida. Retrieved from UMI Dissertations Publishing.
Hodges, A.W., 2000. Continued research and development of pine oleoresin production from Pinus elliottii by borehole tapping, 1998-1999. Forest Chemicals Review. Sept-Oct, 1-11.
Hodges, J.D., Elam, W.W., Watson, W.F., 1977. Physical properties of the oleoresin system of the four major southern pines. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7, 520-525.
Hodges, J.D., Elam, W.W., Watson, W.F., Nebeker, T.E., 1979. Oleoresin characteristic and susceptibility of four southern pines to southern pine beetle attack. Canadian Entomologist 111, 889-896.
Hodges, J.D., Elam, W.W., Bluhm, D.R., 1981. Influence of resin duct size and number on oleoresin flow in the southern pines. Southern Forest Experiment Station SO-266, 1-3.
Hodges, A.W., Ferguson, R., 2011. Pine oleoresin production by borehole tapping: technical and economic feasibility assessment. Final Project Report to Industrias AIEn S.A. de C.V.
Hodges, A.W., Johnson, J.D., 1997. Borehole oleoresin production from slash pine. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 21, 108-115
265
Hood, S., Sala, A., 2015. Ponderosa pine resin defenses and growth: metrics matter. Tree Physiology 35, 1223-1235.
Hood, S., Sala, A., Heyerdahl, E. K., Boutin, M., 2015. Low-severity fire increases tree defense against bark beetle attacks. Ecology 96, 1846-1855.
Huber, D.W., Philippe, R.N., Madilao, L.L., Sturrock, R.N., Bohlmann, J., 2005. Changes in anatomy and terpene chemistry in roots of Douglas-fir seedlings following treatment with methyl jasmonate. Tree Physiology 25, 1075-1083.
Hudgins, J.W., Christiansen, E., Franceschi, V.R., 2003. Methyl jasmonate induces changes mimicking anatomical defenses in diverse members of the Pinaceae. Tree Physiology 23, 361-371.
Hudgins, J.W., Christiansen, E., Franceschi, V.R., 2004. Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective. Tree Physiology 24, 251-264.
Hudgins, J.W., Franceschi, V.R., 2004. Methyl jasmonate-induced ethylene production is responsible for conifer phloem defense responses and reprogramming of stem cambial zone for traumatic resin duct formation. Plant Physiology 135, 2134-2149
IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A. (Eds.). Geneva, Switzerland.
Jessup, R.W., 2011. Chapter 6 development and status of dedicated energy crops in the United States. Biofuels: global impact on renewable energy, production agriculture, and technological advancements. Tomes, D., Songstad, D., Lakshmanan, P. (Eds.). New York, NY: Springer Science.
Jokela, E.J., 2004. Nutrient management of southern pines. pp. 27-35. In Dickens, E.D., Barnett, J.P., Hubbard, W.G., Jokela, E.J. (Eds.). Slash Pine: still growing and growing! Proc. of the slash pine symposium. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Report SRS-76
Klug, W.S., Cummings, M.R., Spencer, C.A., Palladino, M.A., 2011. Quantitative Genetics and Multifactorial Traits. Concepts of Genetics. 10th ed. San Francisco, CA. Benjamin Cummings. Print.
Klepzig, K.D., Robison, D.J., Fowler, G., Minchin, P.R., Hain, F.P., Allen, H.L., 2005. Effects of mass inoculation on induced oleoresin response in intensively managed loblolly pine. Tree Physiology 25, 681-688.
266
Knebel, L., Robison, D.J., Wentworth, T.R., Klepzig, K.D., 2008. Resin flow responses to fertilization, wounding and fungal inoculation in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) in North Carolina. Tree Physiology 28, 847-853.
Kovarik, B., 2013. Biofuels in history. In: Biofuel crops: production, physiology and genetics. Singh, B.P. (Ed.).
LaPasha, C.A., Wheeler, E.A., 1990. Resin canals in Pinus taeda longitudinal canal lengths and interconnections between longitudinal and radial canals. IAWA Bulletin 11, 227-238.
Larsson, S., Oren, R., Waring, R.H., Barrett, J.W., 1983. Attack of mountain pine beetle as related to tree vigor of ponderosa pine. Forest Science 29, 395-402.
Lekha, C., 2002. Standardization of borehole method of oleoresin tapping in chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent). (Doctoral Dissertation). Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry.
Li, X., Huber, D.A., Powell, G.L., White, T.L., Peter, G.F., 2007. Breeding for improved growth and juvenile corewood stiffness in slash pine. Can. J. For. Res. 37, 1886-1893.
Lin, J., Hu, Y., He, X., Ceulemans, R., 2002. Systematic survey of resin canals in Pinaceae. American Journal of Botany 135, 3-14.
Lin, J., Sampson, D. A., Ceulemans, R., 2002. The effect of crown position and tree age on resin-canal density in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. Canadian Journal of Botany 79, 1257-1261.
Lombardero, M.J., Ayres, M.P., Ayres, B.D., 2006. Effects of fire and mechanical wounding on Pinus resinosa resin defenses, beetle attacks, and pathogens. Forest Ecology and Management 225, 349-358.
Lombardero, M.J., Ayres, M.P., Lorio, P.L., Ruel, J.J., 2000. Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defenses of Pinus taeda. Ecology Letters 3, 329-339.
Lopez-Upton, J., White, T.L., Huber, D.A., 1999. Taxon and family differences in survival, cold hardiness, early growth, and rust incidence of loblolly pine slash pine and some pine hybrids. Silvae Genetica 48, 303-313.
Lorio Jr., P.L., 1986. Growth-differentiation balance: a basis for understanding southern pine beetle-tree interactions. Forest Ecology and Management 14, 259-273.
Lorio Jr., P.L., Hodges, J.D., 1968. Microsite effects on oleoresin exudation pressure of large loblolly pines. Ecology 49, 1207-1210.
267
Martin, D.M., Gershenzon, J., Bohlmann, J., 2003. Induction of volatile terpene biosynthesis and diurnal emission by methyl jasmonate in foliage of Norway spruce. Plant Physiology 132, 1586–1599.
Mason, R.R., 1971. Soil moisture and stand density affect oleoresin exudation flow in a loblolly pine plantation. Forest Science 17, 170-177.
McNulty, S., Caldwell, P., Doyle, T.W., Johnsen, K., Liu, Y., Mohan, J., Prestemon, J., Sun, G., 2013. Forests and Climate Change in the southeast USA. Ingram, K., Dow, K., Carter, L., Anderson, J. (Eds.). Climate of the southeast United States: variability, change, impacts, and vulnerability. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp. 165-189.
McReynolds, R.D. Gansel C.R., 1985. High-gum-yielding slash pine: performance to age 30. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 9, 29-32.
Mergen, F., Hoekstra, P., Echols, R.M., 1955. Genetic control of oleoresin yield and viscosity in slash pine. Forest Science 1, 19-30.
Meylemans, H.A., Baldwin, L.C., Harvey, B.G., 2013. Low-temperature properties of renewable high-density fuel blends. Energy & Fuels 27, 883-888.
Meylemans, H.A., Quintana, R.L., Harvey, B.G., 2012. Efficient conversion of pure and mixed terpene feedstocks to high density fuels. Fuel 97, 560-568.
Mizukami, H., Tabira, Y., and Ellis, B.E. 1993. Methyl jasmonate-induced rosmarinic acid biosynthesis in Lithospermum erythrorhizon cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Reports 12, 706-709.
Morris, C., 2015. Pine chemicals as an engine for economic growth and sustainability. chem info [updated January 29 2015, cited July 14 2016]. URL https://www.chem.info/blog/2015/01/pine-chemicals-engine-economic-growth-and-sustainability.
Morton, D.C., DeFries, R.S., Shimabukuro, Y.E., Anderson, L.O., Arai, E., del Bon Espirito-Santo F., Freitas, R., Morisette, J., 2006. Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 14637-14641.
Muñoz Del Valle, P.R., Huber, D.A., Butnor, J.R., 2011. Phenotypic analysis of first-year traits in a pseudo-backcross {(slash x loblolly) x slash} and the open-pollinated families of the pure-species progenitors. Tree Genetics & Genomes 7, 183-192.
Nagy, N.E., Franceschi, V.R., Solheim, H., Krekling, T., Christiansen, E., 2000. Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits. American Journal of Botany 87, 302-313.
Nesbit, T.S., 2008. Economic and environmental impacts of ethanol production from southern United States slash pine (Pinus elliottii) plantations. (Masters Dissertation) University of Florida.
Nestbit, T.S., Alavalapati, J.R.R., Dwivedi, P., Marinescu, M.V. 2011. Economics of ethanol production using feedstock from slash pine (Pinus elliottii) plantations in the Southern United States. South. J. Appl. For. 35, 61-66.
Novick, K.A., Katul, G.G., McCarthy, H.R., Oren, R., 2012. Increased resin flow in mature pine trees growing under elevated CO2 and moderate soil fertility. Tree Physiology 32, 752-763.
Olsen, W.K., Schmid, J.M., Mata, S.A., 1996. Stand characteristics associated with mountain pine beetle infestations in ponderosa pine. Forest Science 42, 310-327.
Omer, A.M., 2008. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12, 2265-2300.
Peter, G.F., 2013. Southern pines: the bioenergy & renewable chemicals star of the southeastern US [PowerPoint slides]. URL http://www.secsymposium.com/present+ations/powerpoints/peter-gary.pptx.
Phillips, M. A., Croteau, R. B., 1999. Resin-based defenses in conifers. Trends in Plant Science 4, 184-190.
Popp, M.P., Johnson, J.D., Lesney, M.S., 1995a. Characterization of the induced response of slash pine to inoculation with bark beetle vectored fungi. Tree Physiology 15, 619-623.
Popp, M.P., Johnson, J.D., Lesney, M.S., 1995b. Changes in ethylene production and monoterpene concentration in slash pine and loblolly pine following inoculation with bark beetle vectored fungi. Tree Physiology 15, 807-812.
Raffa, K. F., Aukema, B. H., Erbilgin, N., Klepzig, K. D., Wallin, K. F., 2005. Interactions among conifer terpenoids and bark beetles across multiple levels of scale: an attempt to understand links between population patterns and physiological processes. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 39, 79-118.
Raffa, K.F., Phillips, T.W., Salom, S.M., 1993. Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. In Beetle-pathogen interactions in conifer forests. Schowaller, T.D., Filip, G.M. (Eds). Academic Press, San Diego, California. pp. 103-128.
R Development Core Team, 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. URL http://www.R-project.org.
Reeve, J.D., Ayres, M.P., Lorio, P.L., 1995. Host suitability, predation, and bark beetle population dynamics. Population dynamics: new approaches and synthesis. Cappuccino, N., Price, P.W. (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California. pp. 339-357.
Reineke, L.H., 1933. Perfecting a stand density index for even-aged forests. Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 627-638.
Rezzi, S., Bighelli, A., Castola, V., Casanova, J., 2005. Composition and chemical variability of the oleoresin of Pinus nigra ssp. laricio from Corsica. Industrial Crops and Products 21, 71-79.
Rigling, A., Brühlhart, H., Bräker, O.U., Forster, T., Schweingruber, F.H., 2003. Effects of irrigation on diameter growth and vertical resin duct production in Pinus sylvestris L. on dry sites in the central Alps, Switzerland. Forest Ecology and Management 175, 285-296.
Rissanen, K., Hölttä, T., Vanhatalo, A., Aalto, J., Nikinmaa, E., Rite, H., Bäck, J., 2016. Diurnal patterns in scots pine stem oleoresin pressure in a boreal forest. Plant, Cell and Environment 39, 527-538.
Roberds, J.H., Strom, B.L., 2006. Repeatability estimates for oleoresin yield measurements in three species of the southern pines. Forest Ecology and Management 228, 215-224.
Roberds, J. H., Strom, B.L., Hain, F.P., Gwaze, D. P., McKeand, S. E., Lott, L. H., 2003. Estimates of genetic parmeters for oleoresin and growth traits in juvenile loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33, 2469-2476.
Rodrigues, K.C.S., Apel, M.A., Henriques, A.T. Fett-Neto, A.G., 2011. Efficient oleoresin biomass production in pines using low cost metal containing stimulant paste. Biomass and Bioenergy 35, 4442-4448.
Rodrigues, K.C.S., Azevedo, P.C.N., Sobreiro, L.E., Pelissari, P., Fett-Neto, A.G., 2008. Oleoresin yield of Pinus elliottii plantations in a subtropical climate: effect of tree diameter, wound shape and concentration of active adjuvants in resin stimulating paste. Industrial Crops and Products 27, 322-327.
Rodrigues, K.C.S. Fett-Neto, A.G., 2009. Oleoresin yield of Pinus elliottii in a subtropical climate: seasonal variation and effect of auxin and salicylic acid-based stimulant paste. Industrial Crops and Products 30, 316-320.
Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C.S., Lima, J.C., Fett-Neto, A.G., 2012. Pine oleoresin: tapping green chemicals, biofuels, food protection, and carbon sequestration from multipurpose trees. Food and Energy Security 1, 81-93.
Rodríguez-García, A., López, R., Martín, J.A., Pinillos, F., Gil, L., 2014. Resin yield in Pinus pinaster is related to tree dendrometry, stand density and tapping-induced
270
systemic changes in xylem anatomy. Forest Ecology and Management 313, 47-54.
Santoro, A.E., Lombardero, M.J., Ayres, M.P., Ruel, J.J., 2000. Interactions between fire and bark beetles in an old growth pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 144, 245-254.
SAS Institute Inc. 2016. Discovering JMP 13®. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Schopmeyer, C.S., Mergen, F., Evans, T.C., 1954. Applicability of Poiseuille’s law to exudation of oleoresin from wounds on slash pine. Plant Physiology 29, 82-87.
Seager, R., Ting, M., Held, I., Kushnir, Y., Lu, J., Vecchi, G., Huang, H-P., Harnik, N., Leetmaa, A., Lau, N-C., Li, C., Velez, Naik, N., 2007. Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316, 1181-1184.
Seager, R., Tzanova, A., Nakamura, J., 2009. Drought in the southeastern United States: Causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimate change. Journal of Climate 22, 5021-5045.
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., Yu, T.H., 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319, 1238-1240.
Sharma, K.R., Lekha, C., 2013. Tapping of Pinus roxburghii (chir pine) for oleoresin in Himachal Pradesh, India. Advances in Forestry Letters (AFL) 2, 51-55.
Silverman, F.P., Petracek, P.D., Fledderman, C.M., Ju, Z., Heiman, D.F., Warrior, P., 2005. Salicylate activity. 1. Protection of plants from paraquat injury. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 9764-9768.
Singh, B.P., 2013. Physiology and genetics of biofuel crop yield. Biofuel crops: production, physiology and genetics. Singh, B.P. (Eds.).
Smith, A.L., Klenk, N., Wood, S., Hewitt, N., Henriques, I., Yan, N., Bazely, D.R., 2013. Second generation biofuels and bioinvasions: an evaluation of invasive risks and policy responses in the United States and Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27, 30-42.
Song, Z., Liang, Z., Liu, X., 1995. Chemical characteristics of oleoresin from Chinese pine species. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 23, 517-522.
Squillace, A.E., 1965. Combining superior growth and timber quality with high gum yield in slash pine. In: 8th southern forest tree improvement conference Savannah, Georgia. June 17-18. pp. 73-76.
Squillace, A.E., 1971. Inheritance of monoterpene composition in cortical oleoresin of slash pine. Forest Science 17, 381-387.
Squillace, A.E., Bengtson, G.W., 1961. Inheritance of gum yields and other characteristics of slash pine. Proc. 6th South. Conf. Forest Tree Improvement. pp. 85-96.
Squillace, A.E., Dorman, K.W., 1961. Selective breeding of slash pine for high-oleoresin yield and other characters. Recent Advances in Botany, University of Toronto Press. pp. 1616-1621.
Squillace, A.E., Fisher, G.S., 1966. Evidences of the inheritance of turpentine composition in slash pine. In Joint Proceeding of the Second Genetics Workshop of the American Foresters and the Seventh Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Research Paper. NcC-6. St. Paul, Minnesota United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station pp. 53-60.
Srivastava, L. M., 1963. Secondary phloem in the Pinaceae. University of California Publications. Botany. 36, 1-142.
Stanley, D., Voeks, R., Short, L., 2012. Is non-timber forest product harvest sustainable in the less developed world? A systematic review of the recent economic and ecological literature. Ethnobiology and Conservation 1, 1-39.
Stark, R.W., 1965. Recent trends in forest entomology. Annual Review of Entomology 10, 303-324.
Steele, C. L., Lewinsohn, E., Croteau, R., 1995. Induced oleoresin biosynthesis in grand fir as a defense against bark beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92, 4164-4168.
Strauss, S. Y., Rudgers, J. A., Lau, J. A., Irwin, R. E., 2002. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 278-285.
Strom, B.L., Goyer, R.A., Ingram Jr., L.L., Boyd, G.D.L., Lott, L.H., 2002. Oleoresin characteristics of progeny of loblolly pines that escaped attack by the southern pine beetle. Forest Ecology and Management 158, 169-178.
272
Stubbs, J., Roberts, D.R., Outcalt, K.W., 1984. Chemical stimulation of lightwood in southern pines. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. General Technical Report SE-25.
Sturgeon, K.B., 1979. Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation. Evolution 33, 803-814.
Sukarno, A. Hardiyanto, E. B., Marsoem S. N., and Na’iem, M., 2015. Oleoresin production, turpentine yield and components of Pinus merkusii from various Indonesian provenances. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 27, 136-141.
Sullivan, B., 2014. Naval Stores Industry. New Georgia Encyclopedia. 16 September 2014. Web. 28 April 2015.
Susaeta, A., Peter, G.F., Hodges, A.W., Carter, D.R., 2014. Oleoresin tapping of planted slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii) adds value and management flexibility to landowners in the southern United States. Biomass and Bioenergy 68, 55-61.
Tadesse, W., Nanos, N., Auñon, F.J., Alía, R., Gil, L., 2001. Evaluation of high resin yielders of Pinus pinaster Ait. Forest Genetics 8, 271-278.
Thaler, J.S., Stout, M.J., Karban, R., Duffey, S.S., 2001. Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a community of herbivores. Ecological Entomology 26, 312-324.
Thompson, A., Cooper, J., Ingram, Jr. L.L., 2006. Distribution of terpenes in heartwood and sapwood of loblolly pine. Forest Products Journal 56, 46-48.
Ticktin. T., 2004. The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 11-21.
Tisdale, R.A., Nebeker, T.E., 1992. Resin flow as a function of height along the bole of loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Botany 70, 2509-2511.
Trenberth, K.E., Dai, A., van der Schrier, G., Jones, P.D., Barichivich, J., Briffa, K.R., Sheffield, J., 2013. Global warming and changes in drought. Nature Climate Change 4, 17-22.
United States Census Bureau, 2016. Economic Indicators Division USA Trade Online. United States Department of Commerce. Source: U.S. Import and Export Merchandise trade statistics. products [updated 2016, cited July 30 2016]. URL https://usatrade.census.gov/data/.
USGCRP, 2009. Global climate change impacts in the United States. Melillo, J.M., Richmond, T. (T.C.)., Yohe, G.W. (Eds.). United States Global Change Research Program. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
USGCRP, 2014. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. Karl, T.R., Melillo, J.M., Peterson, T.C. (Eds.). United States Global Change Research Program. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
USDA Forest Service, 1971a. Heritability and seasonal changes in viscosity of slash pine oleoresin. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Note SE-155.
USDA Forest Service, 1971b. Adapting the bubble-time method for measuring viscosity of slash pine oleoresin. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Note SE-147.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1993a. Official soil series descriptions (OSD) Newnan series. URL https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/N/NEWNAN.html.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1993b. Official soil series descriptions (OSD) Wauchula series. URL https://soilseries.sc.egov.usda.gov/OSD_Docs/W/WAUCHULA.html
Vité, J., 1961. The influence of water supply on oleoresin exudation pressure and resistant to bark beetle attack in Pinus ponderosa. Contributions of Boyce Thompson Institute 21, 31-66.
Wallin, K.F., Kolb, T.E., Skov, K.R., Wagner, M.R., 2003. Effects of crown scorch of ponderosa pine resistance to bark beetles in Northern Arizona. Environmental Entomology 32, 652-661.
Wallin, K.F., Kolb, T.E., Skov, K.R., Wagner, M.R., 2004. Seven-year results of thinning and burning restoration treatments on old ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Restoration Ecology 12, 239-247.
Wang, Z., Calderon, M.M., Carandang, M.G., 2006. Effects of resin tapping on optimal rotation age of pine plantation. Journal of Forest Economics 11, 245-260.
Weed, A.S., Ayres, M.P., Hicke, J.A., 2013. Consequences of climate change for biotic disturbances in North American forests. Ecological Monographs 83, 441-470.
Wei, R.P., Yang, R., Wei, Q., 2014. Effect of lime application to acidic soils on oleoresin yield tapped from pine plantations in south China. Open Journal of Forestry 4, 390-397.
Westbrook, J.W., Resende Jr, M.F.R., Muñoz Del Valle, P.R., Walker, A.R., Wegrzyn, J.L., Nelson, C.D., Neale, D.B., Kirst, M., Huber, D.A., Gezan, S.A., Peter, G.F., Davis, J.M., 2013. Association genetics of oleoresin flow in loblolly pine: discovering genes and predicting phenotypes for improved resistance to bark beetles and bioenergy potential. New Phytologist 199, 89-100.
Wilhite, L.P., Jones, E.P., 1981. Bedding effects in maturing slash pine stands. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 5, 24-27.
Wood, D. L., 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annual Review of Entomology 27, 411-446.
World Trade Atlas. 2016. Global Trade Information Services, Inc. Internet version 4.7e. Data on China exports. Retrieved Jan. 4, 2016.
Wu, H., Hu, Z., 1997. Comparative anatomy of resin ducts of the Pinaceae. Trees 11, 135-143.
Xiao, Y., Jokela, E.J., White, T.L., 2003. Growth and leaf nutrient responses of loblolly and slash pine families to intensive silvicultural management. Forest Ecology and Management 183, 281-295.
Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H., Hozumi, K., 1963. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Journal of Biology 14, 107-129
Zerbe, P., Bohlmann, J., 2014. Bioproducts, biofuels, and perfumes: conifer terpene synthases and their potential for metabolic engineering. In: Phytochemicals- biosynthesis, function, and application. Jetter, R. (Eds.). pp. 85-107.
Zhang, S. Y., Chauret, G., Swift, D.E., Duchesne, I., 2006. Effects of precommercial thinning on tree growth and lumber quality in a jack pine stand in New Brunswick, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36, 945-952.
275
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Marie Jennifer Lauture was born in Port-au-Prince, Haiti in 1992, and moved to
Miami, Florida at age 5. In 2009, after graduating high school, she moved to Gainesville,
Florida to pursue an undergraduate degree at the University of Florida. As an
undergraduate student, Jennifer began working with Dr. Gary Peter and his graduate
students as a field and laboratory technician. In 2013, Jennifer received her Bachelor of
Science degree in Wildlife Ecology and Conservation. In 2013, she joined the School of
Forest Resources and Conservation at the University of Florida to pursue her graduate
study under the supervision of Dr. Gary Peter. She received her PhD from the