Page 1
1
References
Abdul Rahim Hamdan., Mohd Najib Ghafar., & Lily Ting Hwa Li. (2010).
Teaching Competency Testing among Malaysian School Teachers, European
Journal of Social Sciences , 12, (4).
Abdullah Topcu., & Ubuz, B. (2008). The Effects of Metacognitive Knowledge on
the B.Ed trainees’ Participation in the Asynchronous Online Forum. Educational
Technology & Society, 11 (3), 1-12.
Adrienne Kozan Naumescu. (2008). Science teacher competencies in a knowledge
based society. Acta Didactica Napochnsia, 1(1).
Agiuseppe Chiazzese., Simona Ottaviano., Gianluca Merlo., Antonella Chifari.,
Mario Allegra., Luciano Seta., & Giovanni Todaro.(2006). Metacognition in Web-
Based Learning Activities, Springer, 290 – 298.
Altunoglu, B. D., & Atav, E. (2005). Teacher expectations for more efficient
biology instruction. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28, 19-28.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993).Benchmark for
Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Amutha, S., & Ramganesh, E. (2010). Application of Metacognition in the
Instructional Design and e-content development, e-Resources in Higher education
, International Conference Proceedings, Department of Educational Technology,
Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli. 121-124.
Anderson, J. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2000). Implications of the ACT-R learning
theory: No magic bullets. In R. Glaser (Ed), Advances in instructional
Page 2
2
psychology: Educational design and cognitive science, 5. 1-33. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anne Graham., & Renata Phelps (2003). ‘Being a teacher’: developing teacher
identity and enhancing practice through Metacognitive and Reflective learning
processes, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27( 2).1-14.
Anne Graham., Renata Phelps., Berenice Kerr., & Andrew Burgess. (2003).
Investigation of the effect of a Metacognitive and Reflective approach to the
Professional development of teachers in information and communication
technology (ICT). School of Education, Southern Cross University. Unpublished
Report.
Anne K. Morris. (2006). Assessing B.Ed trainees’ skills for analyzing teaching,
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9,471–505.
Arzu Tasdelen Karçkay., & Seyda Sanha. (2009). The effect of micro teaching
application on the pre-service teachers’teacher competency levels. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Sciences ,1 ,844–847.
Ashburn, E.A. (1987). Three crucial issues concerning the preparation of teachers
for our classrooms : Definition, development, and determination of competence .
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, D.C.
Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated
pedagogical Hillsdale, agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 416–427.
Australian National Science Standard Committee (2002) National professional
standards for highly accomplished teachers of science. Canberra, Australia:
ASTA.
Page 3
3
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York:
Holt, Rinehard & Winston.
Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional
issues in research on Metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion.
Metacognition and Learning, 4 (1), 87–95.
Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A.F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and
metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds.
Instructional Science (Special Issue on Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning and
Metacognition: Implications for the Design of Computer-Based Scaffolds), 33,
367-379.
Baird, J.R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A
classroom study. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 263-282.
Baird, J.R., & White, R.T. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in the classroom. In
D.F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B.J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in
science and mathematics (pp. 190- 200). New York: Teachers College Press.
Baker,E.L.(1973). The Technology of Instructional development. In
R.M.W.Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching, Chicago, Rand
McNally.
Balakrishnan Muniandy, B., Fong, S.F., & Mohamad, R. (2008). Pre Service
Teachers Authoring Multimedia: A Project-Based Learning Approach. In J. Luca
& E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational
Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 3853-3857,Chesapeake, VA:
AACE.
Page 4
4
Balakrishnan Muniandy.,Tan Poay Phing., & Rasslene Rass Rasalingam. (2009).
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Training Curriculum for Pre
Service Teachers in Malaysian Public Universities: Challenges in Preparing Next
Generation of Teachers. CITM Research Monograph, University of Sains,
Malaysia.
Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry
understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science
Education, 89(1), 117-139.
Barak Miri., & Ben-Chaim David., & Zoller Uri. (2007). Purposely Teaching for
the Promotion of Higher-order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking,
Research in science Education, 37(4), 353–369.
Beeth, M.E.(1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a
metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82, 343-356.
Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors ,Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Black, P.,& Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in
Education, 5 (1), 7-74.
Blank, L.M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student
understanding? Science Education, 84(4), 486-516.
Bliss, J. Monk, M., & Ogborn, J. (1983). Qualitative Data Analysis for
Educational Research Groom Helm, London.
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge, Journal of
Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878.
Page 5
5
Borkowski, J., Carr, M., & Pressely, M. (1987). Spontaneous strategy use:
Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11, 61-75.
Bowsher, J.E. (1989). Educating America: Lessons learned in the nation’s
corporations. New York: Wiley.
Bracha Kramarski., & Tova Michalsky. (2007). Preparing B.Ed trainees for
Professional Education Within a Metacognitive Computer-Based Learning
environment. Springer. 93-100.
Brenda Capobianco., & James Lehman.( 2004). Using Technology to Promote
Inquiry in Elementary Science Teacher Education: A Case Study of One Teacher
Educator's Initiatives. In R. Ferdig et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for
Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 4625-
4630. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other
more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.),
Metacognition, motivation, and understanding 65-116. Hillsdale, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, P. L., & Abell, S. K. (2007). Cultural diversity in the science classroom.
Science and Children, 44 (9), 60-61.
Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual
knowledge acquisition. In Resnick, L., ed., Knowing, learning, and instruction:
Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
393– 451.
Brown, N. (1980). Meta-cognitive development and reading., In: Theoretical
issues in reading comprehension: perspectives from cognitive psychology,
Page 6
6
linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education, edited by Rand J. Spiro, Bertram
C. Bruce, & William F. Brewer. 453-481, Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates,
1980.
Bruce Weil. (1978), Information Processing Models of Teaching, Prentice Hall,
Inc, Engle woods Cliffs, New Jersey.
Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge Mass: Harvard
University Press.
Bruner, J. (1973). Going Beyond the Information Given, New York: Norton.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). 'Feedback and self-regulated learning: A
theoretical synthesis.' Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
Campbell, D.,& Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs
for research. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
Carin, A.A., Sund, R.B. (1989). How can you improve your questioning and
answering skills? In Teaching Science Through Discovery. pp 152-173 ,6th ed.
Columbus (OH): Merrill Publishing Company.
Carr, A.A., Jonassen, D.H., Litzinger, M.E., & Marra, R. M. (1998). Good Ideas
to Foment Educational Revolution: The Role of Systemic Change in Advancing
Situated Learning, Constructivism and Feminist Pedagogy . Educational
Technology, 5-15.
Page 7
7
Carroll, J.M., & Olson, J.R. (1988). Mental models in human-computer
interaction. In M.Helander (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Catherine McLoughlin., & Rowan W. Hollingworth.,(2001).Developing science
students' metacognitive problem solving skills online, Australian Journal of
Educational Technology , 17(1), 50-63.
Charalambos Vrasidas., Marina S. McIsaac. (2001). Integrating Technology in
Teaching and Teacher Education: Implications for Policy and Curriculum Reform
paper presented in the ICEM-CIME Geneva Conference Technology in Teacher
Education, Education Media International, 127-13.
Charlene D'Avanzo (2003).Application of research on learning to college teaching:
Ecological examples, Bioscience. Washington. 53(11), 1121.
Chi, Hyun Jung, (2010). Development and examination of a model of Science
Teacher Identity, Doctoral Thesis submitted to The Ohio State University.
Clark, D., Smith, R., Newby, T., & Cook, V. (1985). ‘Origins of teacher
behaviours’. Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (6), 49-54.
Coburn, A. (2000). Constructivism: Science education’s grand unifying theory.
The Clearing House 74 , 9–12.
Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and
practices. In B J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning
and performance (pp. 229-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coutinho Clara, P. (2007). Infusing technology in pre service teacher education
programs in Portugal: an experience with weblogs. In R. Craslen et al
Page 8
8
(Eds.).Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the Society for
Information Technology & Teacher Education, SITE 2007.
Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science
education, Assessment in Education, 6, 101-116.
Curtis L. Broderick. (2001).What is Instructional Design?. Retrieved from
http://www.oocities.com/ok_bcurt/whatisID.htm.
Dachao Li., & Ping Li, (2003) A Maximized Hypothesis in the Framework of Scientific
Cognition as Model-Based Reasoning. Retrieved from
http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2005/docs/p2513.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L.(1996). Teaching for High Standards: What Policymakers Need
to Know and Be Able to Do. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in
Education, University of Pennsylvania, co-published with the National
Commission on Teaching and America's Future, 1998.
David Devraj Kumar., & Robert D. Sherwood. (2007). Effect of a Problem Based
Simulation on the Conceptual Understanding of Undergraduate Science Education
Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, (3).
David A. Huffaker., & Sandra l. Calvert. (2003). The New Science of Learning:
Active learning, Metacognition, and Transfer of knowledge in E-learning
applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 325-334.
Demetriou, A., & Panaoura, A.(2006). Mathematics in the Mind: Architecture,
Development and Educational Implication, in F. Dochy, L. Vershcaffel, M.
Boekaerts & S. Vosniadou (eds.), Instructional Psychology: Past, Present and
Future Trends: Sixteen Essays in Honor of Erik De Corte, Elsevier, pp.19-37.
Page 9
9
Denis Goodrum., & Leonie J. Rennie.(2007). Australian School Science Education
National Action Plan, Volume 2.
Dennis J. Rose., & John Church R. (1998) Learning to Teach: The Acquisition and
Maintenance of Teaching Skills, Journal of Behavioral Education, 8(1), 5-35.
Dhindsa H. S., & O. R. Anderson. (2004). Using a Conceptual-Change Approach
to Help Pre-service Science Teachers Reorganize Their Knowledge Structures for
Constructivist Teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1).
Di Sessa, A. A. (1986). Models of Computation. User Centered System Design. D.
A. Norman and S. W. Draper. Hillsdale NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dick, W. (1987). A history of instructional design and its impact on educational
psychology. In J. Glover & R. Roning (Eds.), Historical foundations of
educational psychology. New York: Plenum.
Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking. Roeper
Review, 8(2), 96-100.
Donald Norman, A. (1988). How goes cognitive science? Journal of Artificial
Intelligence (Japan). 3(2).
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (1999). How people
learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academy: Washington DC.
Donovan, S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How Students Learn: History,
Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom: National Academies Press.
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to
recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
12(3), 83-87.
Page 10
10
Dunslosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An
evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37-56.
Duschl, R.A., Schweingruber H.A., & Shouse. A.W. (2007). Taking science to
school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press.
Earle, R. S. (2002). The Integration of Instructional Technology into public
education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42 (1), 5-13.
Edmund Short, C. (1985). The Concept of competence: Its use and misuse in
education . Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 2-6.
Edmundson, P. (1990). ‘A normative look at the curriculum in teacher education’.
Phi del. Kap, 71 (9), 717-22.
Elizabeth Murphy, (2008). A framework for identifying and promoting
metacognitive knowledge and control in online discussants, Canadian Journal of
Learning and Technology, 34(2), printemps.
Emily Hixon., & So, Hyo.Jeong. (2009). Technology's Role in Field Experiences
for Pre-service Teacher Training. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 294–
304.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated
and reflective, Instructional Science, 24, 1-24.
Esen Uzuntiryaki., Yezdan Boz., Demet Kirbulut., & Oktay Bektas. (2010). Do
Pre-service Chemistry Teachers Reflect their Beliefs about Constructivism in their
Teaching Practices? Research Science Education. 40,403–424.
Page 11
11
Esin Atav., & Bahattin Deniz Altunoglu. (2009). Perception of pre-service
teachers about their competence in biology Applications, Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1278–1284.
Eunjoo Oh., & Russell French.(2002).Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions of an
Introductory Instructional Technology Course, Electronic Journal for the
Integration of Technology in education. Retrieved from
http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume3No1/Oh.htm.
Eunjoo Oh., & Russell French. (2004).Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions of an
Introductory Instructional Technology Course, Electronic journal for the
Integration of Technology in Education. Retrieved from
http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume3No1/Oh.htm.
Fei Yin Lo., & Benny Hin Wai Yung. (2010). Teachers’ affective learning in
teacher development activities using classroom videos as the mediating artifact. In
M. F. Tasar & G. Cakmakci (Ed.) Contemporary Science Education Research :
Pre-service and In-service Teacher Education, 341, 350, Ankara, Turkey.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). ‘Pitfalls of experience in teacher
preparation’. Teachers College Record, 87, 53-65.
Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick
(Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of
metacognition. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation,
and understanding (pp. 21-29). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Page 12
12
Gagne, R. M. (1962). Military training and principles of learning. American
Psychologist, 69 (4), 355–365.
Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston.
Gagne, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning, 3rd edition. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston.
Gagne, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston.
Gagne, R., Briggs, L. & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th
Ed.). Fort Worth, TX: HBJ College Publishers.
Gagne, R., Wager, W, Golas, K., & Keller, J. (2005). Principles of Instructional
Design (5th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Garner, R., & Alexander, P. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered
questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143-158.
Gay, G. R. (1999). Learning to Learn: Thinking and Learning Skills. Retrieved
from http://snow.utoronto.ca/Learn2/introll.html.
Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of
Metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 365–383.
Gertrude Hennessey, M.G. (2003). Metacognitive aspects of students' reflective
discourse: Implications for intentional conceptual change teaching and learning. In
G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 103-
132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Page 13
13
Gibbons, P. (2008). It was taught good and I learned a lot intellectual practices
and ESL learners in the middle years. Australian Journal of Language and
Literacy, 31 (2), 155-173.
Giere, R. (1991). Understanding Scientific Reasoning ,Orlando, FL: Holt,
Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Gilbert, J. (1993). The role of models and modelling in science education.
Presented at the 1993 Annual Conference of the National Association for Research
in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gilbert, J. (1995). The role of models and modeling in some narratives in science
learning. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, April 18-22. San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gilbert, J., & Boulter, C. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling.
In B. Fraser and K. Tobin (eds), International Handbook of Science Education
(Netherlands: Kluwer), 52-66.
Gilbert, S. (1991).Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79.
Gilbert. N.(2000). Models, Processes and Algorithms: Towards a Simulation
Toolkit. In Suleiman R, Troitzsch KG and Gilbert N (Eds.), Tools and Techniques
for Social Science Simulation. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Goodrum, D., Hackling, M. & Rennie, L. (2000). Science teaching and learning in
Australian schools. Paper Presented at the Australasian Science Education
Research Association Conference, June 29-1 July, Perth WA.
Page 14
14
Grabowski, B. J. (2004). Generative learning contributions to the design of
instruction and learning. In D. J. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Educational
Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 719–743). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D.S., & Van Lehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep
comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor and iSTART.
Educational Psychologist. 40 (4). 225-234.
Graham, B. (2006). Conditions for successful field experiences: perceptions of
cooperating teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22 (8), 1118-1129.
Gray, D. S., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2006). Socio-scientific issues in science education:
Implications for the professional development of teachers. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 36, 171–192.
Gregory Schraw. (2008). A conceptual analysis of five measures of Metacognitive
monitoring. Springer Science. 4, 33–45.
Gregory Schraw., Kent J. Crippen., & Kendall Hartley. (2006). Promoting Self-
Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective
on Learning, Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
Gunstone, R. F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the
enhancement of metacognition. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.),
The content of science,131–146. London: Falmer.
Gunstone, R. F. (1999). Content knowledge, reflection and their intertwining: A
response to the paper set. Science Education, 83 (3), 393-396.
Page 15
15
Hacker, J.D., Bol, L., Horgan, D.D., & Rakow, E.A. (2000). Test prediction and
performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (1),
160- 170.
Hacker,D.J.,Dunlosky,J.,& Graesser,A.C.(1998).Metacognition in Educational
theory and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hairul Nizam Ismail .,Suhail Mahmoud Al-Zoubi., Majdoleen Bani Abdel
Rahman., & Ahmad Mohammad Al-Shabatat. (2009). Competence Based Teacher
Education (CBTE): A Training Module for Improving Knowledge Competencies
for Resource Room Teachers in Jordan. European Journal of Social Sciences,
(10), 166-178.
Handal, G.A., Leiner, M.A., González, C. & Rogel, E. (1999). Animation and
storytelling as means to enhance and stimulate the learning of Chemistry in the
classroom environment. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of World
Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications,
1656. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Harpaz, Y. (2003). Approaches to Teaching Thinking: Towards a Conceptual
Mapping of the Field. Mandel Leadership Institute Retrieved from
http://www.learningtolearn.sa.edu.au/Colleagues/pages/default/harpaz/. Last.
Hartman, H. J. (2001). Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory,
research, and practice. Neuropsychology and Cognition, Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. (2002). Instructional
media and technologies for learning, 7th ed. Columbus: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Page 16
16
Helen Ngozi ibe. (2009). Metacognitive Strategies on Classroom Participation and
Student Achievement in Senior Secondary School Science Classrooms. Science
Education International, 20 (1), 25-31.
Hennessey, M.G. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications
for conceptual change teaching-learning. Paper presented at annual meeting of
Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
Hewson, P. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. Abell & N.
Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179–1203).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hillway, T.(1964). Introduction to Research. Second Edition. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Understanding complex systems:
Some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 53-61.
Hodgson, T. (1995). Secondary mathematics modeling: Issues and challenges.
School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 351–358.
Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D.C. (1998). Teaching and learning online: Tools,
templates, and training. In: J. Willis, D. Willis, & J. Price (Eds.), Technology and
teacher education annual. Charlottesville, VA: Association for Advancement of
Computing in Education.
Hollingworth, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Developing science students’
metacognitive problem-solving skills online. Australian Journal of Educational
Technology, 17(1), 50-63.
Page 17
17
Horwitz, P., & Barowy, W. (1994). Designing and Using Open- Ended Software
to Promote Conceptual Change, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3,
3.
Huann-shyang Lin., & Houn-Lin Chiu. (2000). Using Computers to Support a
Beginning Teacher’s Professional Development, Journal of Science Education
and Technology, 9,(4),367-373.
Hurd, P. D. (1986). Perspectives for the reform of science education. Phi Delta
Kappan , 67, 353-358.
Jacobs, J.E., & Paris, S.G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues
in definition, measurement and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-
278.
James Bower.(1994). Scientists and science education reform: myths, methods,
and madness. National Academy of Science's Resources for Involving Scientists in
Education. Retrieved from http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg2a.htm.
Jane Howland., & Judy Wedman.(2004). A Process Model for Faculty
Development: Individualizing Technology Learning, Journal of Technology and
Teacher Education, 12, Retrieved from http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.
Johannes Cronje.(2006). Educational Technology Research and Development.
Washington: 54(4), 387-417.
John K. Gilbert. (2004).Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science
education, Institute of Education, The University of Reading, UK.
Page 18
18
Jonathan Singer A., & Michelle A. Maher. (2007). B.Ed trainees and Technology
Integration: Rethinking Traditional Roles. Journal of Science Teacher Education,
18,955-984.
Josefina Santana.(2005). Moving towards Metacognition. Retrieved from
http://www.readingmatrix.com/conference/pp/proceedings2005/santana.pdf.
Judy Somers, L. (2009). Using concept maps to explore pre-service teachers'
perceptions of science content knowledge, teaching practices, and reflective
processes, Doctoral Thesis submitted to Florida Atlantic University.
Jurich, S. (2008). Video Technology for Teacher Training: Micro-Teaching and
other adventures. At http://www.techknowlogia.org/tkl_active_pages2.
Kasinath. H.M. (2008). The Information processing approach to knowledge,
Experiments in Education, 36 (11), 239-244.
Keogh, B., & Naylor, S. (1999). Science on the Underground: an initial
evaluation. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 1-18.
King, A. & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative-questioning on
children's knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 6, 127-
148.
Koehler, V. (1988). Barriers to effective supervision of student teaching: A field
study. Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (2), 28-34.
Korthagen, E., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). ‘Developing fundamental
principles for teacher education programs and practices’. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 22, 1020–1041.
Page 19
19
Koseoglu & Soran. (2004). Views on the competence of biology teachers in using
material and tool, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 27 ,189–195.
Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations
and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning.
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-143.
Kpanja, E. (2001). A study of the effects of video tape recording in microteaching
training. Journal of Educational Technology. 32(4), 483-486.
Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be
supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 22, 24-33.
Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated
learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of
Educational Research, 99(4), 218-230.
Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of
metacognitive training on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 49, 225–250.
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in
the classroom: Effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training.
American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310.
Krathwohl,D.(2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy : An overview. Theory into
Practice,41(4),212-218.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How differences in
recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology,.77(6), 1121-1134.
Page 20
20
Kuhn, D. (1999). A Developmental model of critical thinking. Educational
Research, 28, 16–26.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.
Kulik, J. A. (2002). School mathematics and science programs benefit from
instructional Technology. Washington DC: National Science Foundation
Directorate of Social Behavior and Economic Science.
Lambert, L. & Walker, D., (1995). Learning and leading theory: A century in the
making. In L Lambert, D. Walker, D. P. Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D.
Lambert, M. E. Gardner, & P. J. Ford Slack, The constructivist leader , 1-27. New
York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Land, S. & Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web:
A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research
Development, 48(3), 61–78.
Larkin, S. (2006). Collaborative group work and individual development of
metacognition in the early years. Research in Science Education, 36, 7-27.
Lemma, P. (1993). ‘The cooperating teacher as supervisor: a case study’. Journal
of curriculum and supervision, 8, 329-342.
Leou,M., Abder Pamela., Megan Riordan., & Uri Zoller (2006) Using ‘HOCS-
Centered Learning’ as a Pathway to Promote Science Teachers’ Metacognitive
Development, Research in Science Education, 36, 69–84.
Page 21
21
Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology
Research and Development, 49(2), 23-40.
Lindsey Corner. (2004). Assessing learning about social and ethical issues in a
biology class, School Science Review, 86 (315).
Ling L. Liang., & Greer M. Richardson. (2009). Enhancing prospective teachers'
science teaching efficacy beliefs through scaffolded, student-directed inquiry,
Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21( 1) , 51-66.
Linn, M. C. (1992). Science education reform: Building on the research base.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 821–840.
Linn, M. C., & Muilenberg, L. (1996). Creating Lifelong Science Learners: What
Models Form a Firm Foundation? Educational Researcher, 25(5), 18-24.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K.E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P.W. (2003).
Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics
education (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Corwin.
Lynch, M. (1985). Discipline and the material form of images. An analysis of
scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science, 15, 37-66.
Maor. (2000). A Teacher Professional development program on using a
constructivist multimedia learning environment, 307–330, Kluwer Academic
Publishers. Netherlands.
Maricar S. Prudente., & Socorro E. Aguja. (2002). Science Teaching/Learning
Processes in Pre-service Teacher Education: The De La Salle University-Manila
Experience. Retrived from
http://www.hiceducation.org/edu_proceedings/Maricar%20S.%20Prudente.pdf
Page 22
22
Markus Wilhelm.,Dorothee Brovelli.,Markus Rehm., & Alexander
Kauertz.(2010). Professional identity and competence in science teaching among
student teachers, In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science
education research: pre-service and in-service teacher education (pp. 9-15).
Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Mason, R. (2002). Rethinking assessment in the online environment , in Vrasidas,
C. and Glass, G. (Eds), Current Perspectives in Applied Information
Technologies: Distance Education and Distributed Learning, Information Age
Publishing, Inc., Greenwich, CT, 57-74.
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research,
59(1), 43–64.
McKinnon, G. R. (2000). The dilemma of evaluating electronic discussion groups.
Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 33(2), 125–132.
McKinnon, G. R. (2000). The dilemma of evaluating electronic discussion groups.
Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 33(2), 125–132.
Mechling, K.R. and Oliver, D.L. (1983). Handbook I: Science teaches basic skills.
Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.
Merrill, M. D. (1991). Constructivism and Instructional design. Educational
Technology, 45-53.
Michalski, T., Zion, M., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2007). Developing students’
Metacognitive awareness in asynchronous learning networks in comparison to
face-to-face discussion groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36,
421–450.
Page 23
23
Miller, A. I. (1986). Imagery and scientific thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Mintzes, J.J., & Wandersee, J.H. (1998). Reform and innovation in science
teaching: A human constructivist view. In J.L. Mintzes, J.H. Wandersee & J.D.
Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view
(pp. 29-58). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2007). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
(TPCK): Confronting the Wicked Problems of Teaching with Technology. In C.
Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and
Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2214-2226). Chesapeake,
VA: AACE.
Miyoung Lee., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). Designing Metacognitive Maps for Web-
Based Learning. Educational Technology and Society, 9 (1), 344-348.
Morgan, R. M. (1989). Instructional systems development in third world countries.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 47-56.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. K. (2007). Designing
effective instruction. (5th Ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Moshe Barak., & Larisa Shakhman. (2007). Based Science Teaching: Teachers’
Instructional Practices and Conceptions, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science
& Technology Education, 4(1), 11-20.
Mukerji,S.N.(1958).An Introduction to Indian Education, Acharya Book Depot,
Baroda.
Page 24
24
Myers, M. (2000). Qualitative research and the generalizability question: Standing
firm with Proteus. The Qualitative Report, 4(3/4). Retrieved from
http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/myers.html.
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with
technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
Nemirovsky, R., Kaput J. and Roschelle, J. (1998). Enlarging mathematical
activity from modeling phenomena to generating phenomena. Proceedings of the
22nd International Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education,
Stellenbosch.
Nersessian, N. J. (2007). Mental Modeling in Conceptual Change, International
Handbook of Conceptual Change, S. Vosniadou, ed. London: Routledge, 2008,
391-416.
New house. (2002). Instructional Design Australia. Retrieved from
http://instructionaldesign.com.au/.
Nichols, S. E., Tippins, D., & Wieseman, K. (1997). A toolkit for developing
critically reflective science teachers. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 175–
194.
Nicol, D, J., & Macfarlane-Dick. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated
learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in
Higher Education, 31(2), 199-216.
Novak J.D. (1963). A preliminary statement on research in science education,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 3–9.
Page 25
25
Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2005). A concept map-centered learning
environment. Paper presented at the Symposium at the 11th Biennial Conference
of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI),
Cyprus.
Nurrullah,S., & Naik,J.P.(1949). A students’ History of Education in India (1800-
1947). McMillan & Co.Ltd., Bombay.
Olagunju,M., & Abiona O. F. (2008). Production and Utilization of Resources in
Biology Education. A Case Study Of South West Nigerian Secondary
Schools,International Journal of African & African American Studies 7, (2).
Omwenga, E.I., Waema, T.M., Eisendrath, G.P.C., and Libotton. ( 2005). African
Journal of Science and Technology (AJST), Science and Engineering Series, 6 (1),
45 – 50.
Park, J.H., Faulkner J., & Schaller, M. (2003). Evolved disease-avoidance
processes and contemporary anti-social behavior: prejudicial attitudes and
avoidance of people with physical disabilities. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27,
65–87.
Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as Design (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates).
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In
M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation
(pp.451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching,
and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
Page 26
26
Preston Prather., Robert L. Hartshorn.,& Nancy J.Walters. (2009).A survey
instrument for qualitative and quantitative examination of hands-on-science
instruction using videotape-jury review techniques, Journal of Elementary Science
Education, 2 (1) 16-29.
Puntambekar, D., & DuBoulay, B. (1997). Design and development of MIST: A
system to help students develop metacognition. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 16 (1), 1-35.
Puntambekar, S. (1995). Helping students learn ‘how to learn’ from texts:
Towards and ITS for developing metacognition. Instructional Science, 23 (3),
163–182.
Qiyun Wang. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into
teaching and learning, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45,
(4), 411-419.
Rajput,J.S.(2000). Science Education in schools. Journal of Indian Education, (4),
1-11.
Ramganesh,E.(2003). Effect of Metacognitive orientation on enhancing Problem
Solving Competency in mathematics among the B.Ed trainees. Doctoral Thesis
submitted to Alagappa University, Karaikudi.
Ramganesh.E.(2009). An Objective Measurement of Self-monitoring strategy on
Problem solving in Mathematics, The Indian Educational Researcher, 3(1),39-50.
Raphael, J. S., Tobias., & Greenberg. R. (1999). Research experience as a
component of science and mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of. Science
Teacher Education ,10 (2),147-158.
Page 27
27
Reiser, R. A., & W. Dick (1996). Instructional Planning: A guide for teachers.
Boston, Allyn and Bacon.
Renata Phelps., & Anne Graham. (2007). An investigation of the Metacognitive
influences on teachers’ use of information and communication technology (ICT)
and the implications for teacher professional development. Developing
Technology together, together consolidated report, 1-20.
Rickards, J. P. (1979). Adjunct Post questions in Text: A Critical Review of
Methods and Processes. Review of Educational Research , 49, 181-196.
Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning
chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915–919.
Robert B.Miller. (1953). A method for man-machine task analysis (Tech. Rep.
No. 53-137). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Wright Air Development
Center.
Robert B.Miller. (1962). Analysis and specification of behavior for training. In R.
Glaser (Ed.), Training Research and Education. Pittsburgh: University of
Pittsburgh Press.
Roberts,M.J., & Erdos,G.(1993). Strategy selection and Metacognition.
Educational Psychology, 13, 259-266.
Ronald D. Anderson. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says
about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
Page 28
28
Rosemary C. Reilly., & Gillian Bramwell. (2007).The use of public reflection
circles and the promotion of Metacognition: Teaching for autonomy and good
practice. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 7 (1), 44-63.
Rowe, M. B. (1987). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up.
American Educator 11, 38–47.
Sabar, N. (2004). From heaven to reality through crisis: Novice teachers as
migrants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 145–161.
Sabelli, N. H. (2006). Complexity, Technology, Science, and Education. The
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 5-9.
Sadiah Baharom. (2009). Enhancing self-regulatory motivational strategies
through e-Portfolios, Retrieved from
http://www.unescobkk.org/fileadmin/user_upload/apeid/Conference/13th_Confere
nce/Papers/5.C.1.Enhancing_Self- Regulatory_ motivational_ Strategies
_through_e- portfolios__Sadiah_Baharom.pdf
Saettler, P.(1990). The evolution of American Educational Technology.
Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Sam Carlson., Gadio, C. T., Haddad, W. D., & Draxler, A. (2002). Teacher
professional development in the use of technology. UNESCO and AED. Retrieved
from
http://www.schoolnetafrica.net/fileadmin/resources/Teacher_Professional_Develo
pment_In_the_use_of_Technology.pdf
Sami Sahin. (2006).Computer simulations in Science Education: Implications for
Distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, TOJDE
Ankara, Turkey. 12, 7(4), 132-146.
Page 29
29
Sara McNeil. (2009). Visualizing Mental Models: Understanding Cognitive
Change to Support Teaching and Learning of Multimedia Design and
Development, Retrieved from
http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper111/McNeil.pdf.
Sara wolf.,Thomas Brush., & John Saye.(2003). The Big Six Information Skills as
a Metacognitive Scaffold: A Case Study. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/aaslpubsandjournals/slmrb/slmrcontents/vo
lume62003/bigsixinformation.cfm.
Saravanakumar., & Mohan. (2007). Enhancing Student’s Achievement in Science
through Metacognitive orientation and Attention Activation-An Experimental
Study. Experiments in Education, 35(8).
Savia A. Coutinho. (2006). The Relationship between the Need for Cognition,
Metacognition, and Intellectual Task Performance. Educational Research and
Reviews, 1 (5), 162-164.
Savittree Rochanasmita Arnold., Michael J.Padilla., & Bupphachart Tunhikorn.
(2008). The development of Pre-service science Teachers’ Professional knowledge
in utilizing ICT to support Professional lives, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science & Technology Education, 5(2),91-101.
Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by Doing.
In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models (pp. 160-
181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum.
Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: Structures and processes. In P., Alexander, P., &
Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 245–263). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Page 30
30
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H.
Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: Structures and processes. In P., Alexander, P., &
Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 245–263). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive awareness.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Schraw, G., Crippen. K.J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in
science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning.
Research in Science Education, 36(1–2),111–139.
Schunk, D. H., Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of
self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation
and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research and Applications (pp. 1-30).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schunk, D.H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B.J.
Zimmerman & D.H Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic
achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2, pp125-152). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwartz, B. L., & Perfect, T. J. (2002). Introduction: Toward an applied
metacognition. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition
(pp. 1–11).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Page 31
31
Selva Ranee Subramaniam. (2009). Metacognition in Teaching, Proceedings of
14th International Conference on Thinking, University of Malaya, Malaysia,
Retrieved from
http://www.furnware.co.nz/Portals/0/Documents/51%20Selva%20Ranee.pdf
Sevgi Turani, O Zean Demirel., & Iskender Sayek. (2009).Metacognitive
awareness and self regulated learning skills of Medical students in different
medical curricula. Medical Teacher, 30(9), 149-158.
Shamsha Emanuel.(2010). Integration of Information Technology in Teaching
Learning Process. Retrieved from
http://www.educationinindia.net/download/Shamsha-emanuel.pdf
Shashi Shukla. (2009). Teaching competency, professional commitment and job
satisfaction, New Delhi. Retrieved from
http://illusion.instablogs.com/entry/teaching-competency-professional-
commitment-and-job-satisfaction.
Shelly, G., Cashman, T. J., Gunter, G. A., & Gunter, R. E. (2006). Teachers
discovering computers: Integrating technology and digital media in the classroom
(4th ed.). Boston: Thomson Course Technology.
Short,E.C.(1985). The concept of competence: Its use and misuse in education.
Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 2-6.
Snir, J., & Smith, C. (1995).Constructing Understanding in the Science
Classroom: Integrating Labaroatory Experiments, Student and Computer Models,
and Class Discussion in Learning Scientific Concepts. In Perkins, D., Schwartz, J.,
West, M., and Wiske, S. (Eds.), Software Goes to School, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 233-254.
Page 32
32
Sperandeo-Mineo, R.M., Fazio, C. & Tarantino, G. (2005). Pedagogical Content
Knowledge Development and Pre-Service Physics Teacher Education: A Case
Study, Research in Science Education. 36(3), 235-268.
Sperling, R., Howard, L., Miller., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s
knowledge and regulation of cognition, Contemporary Educational Psychology,
27, 51-79.
Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Case Studies in Science Education. Urbana,
IL: Center for Institutional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of
Illinois.
Stephen Thomas Garrett. (2009). Professional Development for the Integration of
Biotechnology Education, Dissertation submitted to the Queensland University of
Technology,
Sternberg, R. J. (1984). What should intelligence tests test? Implications of a
triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13,
5–15.
Sternberg,R.J.(1986). Intelligence applied.N.Y.:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,
Publishers. Students with learning disabilities. In: Learning Disability Quarterly.
Retrieved from
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-5060528_ITM
Sternberg, R. (1998).Metacognition, Abilities, and Developing Expertise: What
Makes an Expert Student? Instructional Science, 26, (1), 127-140.
Susan Sunny Cooper., & Penee W. Stewart. (2006). Metacognitive Development
in Professional Educators, Presented at annual convention of the American
Educational Research Association in San Francisco.
Page 33
33
Tang, S. (2003). Challenge and support: the dynamics of student teachers’
professional learning in the field experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19,
483–498.
Taylor, V., Middleton III, R., & Napier, L. (1990). A comparison of perceptions of
the importance of MTh: Competencies between in-service and pre-service
teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Education
Research Association, 19th, New Orleans, LA, 14-16.
Thanu Padmanaban.(2010, October 6). Quality Science teachers, The need of the
hour, Education Plus, The Hindu, pp2.
Thomas, G., & McRobbie, C. (2001). Using metaphor for learning to improve
students’ metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 38(2), 222-259.
Thomas J. Dormody., & Robert M. Torres. (2001). Teaching Competencies of
Agricultural Education Program Graduates. New Mexico University. Retrieved
from
http://aaae.okstate.edu/proceedings/2002/NAERC/Teaching%20Comp%20Dormo
dy-Torres.pdf.
Thomas, G. P. (1999). Student restraints to reform: Conceptual change issues in
enhancing students learning processes. Research in Science Education, 19(1), 89–
109.
Thornton, R. K. (1987). Tools for scientific thinking: Microcomputer- based
laboratories for physics teaching. Physics Education, 22(4), 230–238.
Page 34
34
Tickle, L. (2000). Teacher induction: The way ahead, Buckingham: Open
University Press.
Tisher,R.P.(1987). A decade of research on teacher education in Australia, Paper
presented in a symposium at the annual meeting of the American Educational
Association, Washington.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary science
teacher?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 3–25.
Topcu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2008). The Effects of Metacognitive Knowledge on the
B.Ed trainees’ Participation in the Asynchronous Online Forum. Educational
Technology & Society, 11 (3), 1-12.
Trainin, G., & Swanson, H. L. (2005). Cognition, metacognition, and achievement
of college Students with learning disabilities. In: Learning Disability Quarterly.
Retrieved from
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-5060528_ITM
Trowbridge, L.W., & Bybee, R.W. (1986). Becoming a Secondary School Science
Teacher. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.Tsui, A.B.M. (2003). Understanding expertise
in teaching: Case studies of EFL teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Tsui, L. (2003). Reproducing social inequalities through higher education: Critical
thinking as valued capital. The Journal of Negro Education, 72(3), 318‐332.
Tzenz,J.Y., & Schwen,T.(2003). Mental representation-based task analysis for
analyzing value-laden performance. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 51(3),5-23.
Page 35
35
Ugo Besson., Lidia Borghi., Anna De Ambrosis., & Paolo Mascheretti. (2010). A
model of teacher preparation aimed at favouring the diffusion of research-based
teaching practice, In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary Science
Education research: pre-service and in-service Teacher Education (pp. 101-110).
Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Umadevi.M.R. (2008). Effectiveness of Biological Science Inquiry model on
achievement in biology of secondary school students. Experiments in Education,
36 (7) 233-238.
Vaidya,N.(1999). Science Teaching for the 21st Century, Deep and Deep
publications. New Delhi.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006).
Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.
Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
Virgil E. Varvel,. (2006). Online Instructor Competencies, Pointers and Clickers,
7(6).Retrieved from
http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/pointersclickers/2006_11/CompPointer.pdf
Wang, Q.Y., & Woo, H.L. (2007). Systematic planning for ICT integration in
topic learning. Educational Technology and Society, 10 (1), 148-156.
Weinstein, C. E., & Meyer, D. K. (1991). Cognitive learning strategies and college
teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 45, 15-26.
White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning.
Studies in Science Education, 23(1), 21–37.
Page 36
36
White, S.(1993). The relationship between psychological Skills, experience, and
practice commitment among collegiate male and female skiers. Sport Psychology.
7, 49-57.
White, R. T. (1998). Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In B. J.
Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp.
1207–1213). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
White, B., Shimoda, T., & Frederiksen, J.(1999). Enabling Students to Construct
Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for
Metacognitive Development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in
Education, 10(2), 151-182.
William Anthony Sandera. (2001). Conceptual change-based instruction and pre-
service teacher technology preparation: A collective case study, Doctoral
dissertation submitted to Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Wilson, E. (2006). ‘The impact of an alternative model of student teacher
supervision: Views of the participants’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 22–
31.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can
investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom
practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.
Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D.H.
Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for research for Educational Communications and
Technology, 112-142. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Page 37
37
Winograd, P.& Paris, S. G. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic
learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking
and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hilldale, HJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational
Psychology. 11, 87-95
Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational
Psychology. 24, 345-376.
Wittrock M. C. (1991). Generative teaching of comprehension. The Elementary
School Journal, 92(2), 169-184.
Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational
Psychology. 27, 531-541.
Yager, R. E. (1993).Science-technology-society as reform. School Science and
Mathematics, 93(3), 145-151.
Yasemin Godek Altuk. (2010). The role of teacher education courses in
developing teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content
knowledge, In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakc (Eds.), Contemporary science education
research: pre-service and in-service teacher education (pp. 7-21). Ankara,
Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Yehezkel, C., Ben-Ari, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2005). Computer architecture and
mental models. Proceedings of the SIGCSE,St. Louis, MI,101-105.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An
overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.
Page 38
38
Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsants, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting
from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 91(2), 241–250.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension
of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation
and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 1-30).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Commissions / Committees
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993).Benchmark for
Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Australian National Science Standard Committee (2002) National professional
standards for highly accomplished teachers of science. Canberra, Australia:
ASTA.
Education Commission, (1966) Retrieved from
http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/q/3B/7C/3B7C0701.htm.
Kothari Commission. (1960,1966) retrieved from
http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/g/t/HB/0THB0J01.htm.
Mudaliar Commission. (1952). Retrieved from
http://www.education.nic.in/cd50years/q/34/3S/343S0201.htm.
National action plan 2008-2012, Retrieved from
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+impact+of+AuSSI-
WA+at+a+primary+school-a0219003766.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). retrieved from
http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/appenda.html.
Page 39
39
National Science Standard Committee/Australian Science Teachers' Association
(ASTA).(2002). National professional standards for highly accomplished teachers
of science. Canberra, Australia.
National Curriculum Framework. (2005). Publication Department, National
Council of Educational Research and Training ,New Delhi.
National Educational Policy. (1992). retrieved from
http://www.education.nic.in/natpol.asp.
National Science Board Commission. (1983). Pre-college Education in
Mathematics, Science and Technology. Educating Americans for the 2lst century.
A report to the American people and the National Science Board. Washington,
D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office.
NCERT.(2000). National Curriculum Framework for school education, NCERT,
New Delhi.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards,
Washington,D.C.: National Academy Press.
Secondary Education, 1952. J C Aggarwal, (2007). Landmarks In The History Of
Modern Indian Education,Vikas Publication House Pvt Ltd.
UNESCO. (1993).Final Report: International Forum on Scientific and
Technological literacy for all. Paris.
US National Research Council, (2003). Committee to Review the Scientific
Evidence on the Polygraph Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences
and Committee on National Statistics , Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences
and Education, National Research Council of the National Academies, The
National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Woods Education Dispatch, (1854). Retrieved from
http://www.mapsofindia.com/india-education.html.