Reducing carbon Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands Interim Report of a Multi-Disciplinary Study Presented at Wetlands International Side Event 11 December 2009 COP 15, Copenhagen, Denmark BAPPENAS REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
14
Embed
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsInterim Report of a Multi-Disciplinary Study
Presented at Wetlands International Side Event11 December 2009COP 15, Copenhagen, Denmark
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsInterim Report of a Multi-Disciplinary Study
Presented at Wetlands International Side Event11 December 2009COP 15, Copenhagen, Denmark
BAPPENASREPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
• The objective of this analysis is to assess the potential for reducing emissions from the country’s peat lands.
• The analysis assesses – the present extent, land use and land cover of Indonesia’s peat lands, – the magnitude of current peat land emissions, – the possible carbon abatement potentials under the three different
policy scenarios, – the economic costs and benefits of specific policy options and actions
to reduce emissions, and – the potential application of national and international policy
instruments to achieve GHG emission reductions in Indonesia’s peat land.
THETHE STUDY STUDY
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
INDONESIA’S PEAT INDONESIA’S PEAT LANDSLANDSIndonesia has around 21 million hectares of peat. Peat more than 3m thick (around 8million hectares) is protected by law.
In 2006, more than 55% of peat land was forested. Other peat land covers include cropland (14%) and shrub/grassland (20%)
Almost ¼ of Indonesia’s peatland is protected/conserved. About 3.3 million of this is still forested. As of 2006, forestry & plantation licences on peat = 5.6 million hectares.
Agriculture, plantation timber & plantation crops cover more than 3 million hectares of land for development. Although protected by law, more than 2.5million hectares of peat land over 3m deep is allocated for development.
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
THE THE EMISSIONS OF PEAT EMISSIONS OF PEAT LANDSLANDSIndonesia has an average annual net emission of 903 Mt CO2 yr-1 between 2000 and 2006
This estimate is based on:•Estimates of emissions from oxidation of 220 Mt CO2/yr using land use and land cover data from 2000-2006 and previously published emissions factors.•Loss of Above-Ground Biomass of 210 Mt CO2/yr based on past rates of deforestation and carbon stock in peat swamp forests.•Fire emissions estimate of 470 Mt CO2/y, based on published data and the Second National Communication.
The majority of the peat emissions result from uncontrolled burning (contributing 46% of total emissions), peat oxidation (25%) and biomass removal (24%) with the main source regions being Sumatra (44%) and Kalimantan (40%).
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Peat land areas contribute to the national economy principally through the forestry, plantations and agriculture sectors:•Plantations & forestry sectors contributed 3% (USD12.6 billion) [2007]•Oil palm plantation sector contributed 0.85% of GDP & 3 million jobs.But highly carbon intensive:•Peat land contributes approx USD1.06billion (or 0.26%) of Indonesia’s total GDP yet accounts for almost 50% of emissions.•Carbon intensity of the 7 “peat provinces” (90% of Indonesia’s peat) is 22.1 kg of CO2 / US dollar of GRDP.
THE ECONOMICS of PEAT THE ECONOMICS of PEAT LANDLAND
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
MITIGATION POTENTIALMITIGATION POTENTIAL
The BAU scenario assumes all peat areas currently allocated to companies are developed with fire emissions continuing based on historical emissions, which provides an estimated increase in emissions to 1,387 Mt CO2 yr-1 by 2025. The potential emissions under each of three main policy measures are estimated and compared to the BAU scenario Up to 92 % reduction on BAU is possible by 2025 through: 1. Legal compliance and best management practices in existing land under production - 338 Mt CO2 or 24 % reduction2. Peat land rehabilitation and prevention of uncontrolled fires - 430 Mt CO2 or 31 % reduction3. Revision of land allocation, forest conservation and land swaps that direct future development away from peat land - 513 Mt CO2 or 37 % reduction
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Miti-7Miti-6Miti-5Miti-4Miti-3Miti-2Miti-1BAU
Em
iss
ion
s (
Gt
CO
2)
Uncontrolled fire emissions
Development zone (forest land for conversion)
Development zone (production forest and timber plantation)
Protection and conservation zone
Development zone (non-forestry use)
19.5% 24.4%
55.1%
73.2%
87.4%92.4%
MITIGATION POTENTIALMITIGATION POTENTIAL
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Preliminary analysis of the opportunity costs of protecting unlicensed peat, and shifting future development onto mineral soil:•There is a net positive benefit on GDP, and to a lesser extent on tax revenues and local revenues • In terms of macro impact, unlikely to involve opportunity cost due to availability of land at national level. •But an opportunity cost still exists at the local level, especially in districts with little alternative land available. Here, the cost will need to be borne by carbon revenue
THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOKTHE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
Baseline Action 5 =Conserve forest
+ Action 6 = Protectunlicensed peat
land
+ Action 7 = Landswap existing new
licenses
Emission Scenario
US
$ m
illi
on
GDP
Tax reveue
Local revenue
NET POSITIVE BENEFIT OF REVISING NET POSITIVE BENEFIT OF REVISING LAND ALLOCATION, PERMITSLAND ALLOCATION, PERMITS
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
THE BUSINESS OUTLOOKTHE BUSINESS OUTLOOK(1) Implementing Best Practices in Oil Palm on Peat
Comparison of a standard ‘business as usual’ model with a ‘best practice’ model:
• Improving yields and financial performance reduces pressure to open up new peat land.
• The average regional GDP (GRDP) produced by a best practice plantation is more than double that produced on a BAU plantation.
• If 500,000 hectares of peat land plantations are upgraded to best practice management, a further 500,000 hectares would not need to be converted.
• The costs of “best practice” are $1,405 per hectare (discounted at 15%). But the benefit is worth $4,626 – a return on investment of over 22%.
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
THE BUSINESS OUTLOOKTHE BUSINESS OUTLOOK(2) Land Swaps from Peat Land to Mineral Soils
Assessment of the economic viability of shifting planned plantations to degraded mineral soils:
• Net land available for oil palm expansion on degraded mineral soils is 8 million ha. Sufficient to cover planned increase in palm oil production up to 2020.
• Assuming a best practice management, degraded land offers superior rates of return (18.6%) than either unforested (11.3%) or forested peat land (12.9%).
A strong case to review and consider revised business models such as enhanced community-business partnership models or innovative community-based plantation models.
A key success factor for working on degraded mineral land will be Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for the participation of local communities and farmers as business partners.
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
ENABLING LAWS AND ENABLING LAWS AND INSITUTIONSINSITUTIONSThe current policy, institutional and legal environment regarding peat land
management in Indonesia is currently under reviewPolicies are already in place to regulate peat-land management including
limits on developing peat > 3 metres deep, zero burning, and water management
But to reduce emissions at scale, there is still a need for:• A more effective institutional framework for peat and lowland, e.g. to
address overlapping mandates• A performance-based framework to promote best practice• A national strategy, plan and finance for peat land rehabilitation and
fire prevention in degraded peat lands• A comprehensive review of spatial planning e.g. to assess scope for
shifting future development onto mineral soil• A review of experience on land swaps and the potential to scale up
experience from pilots to a national scale policy and program• The development of peat land carbon policies and their articulation at
the international level
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
This study is commissioned and led by the Indonesian National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS), with the support of experts from the Ministry of Forestry, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Bogor Agricultural Institute (IPB), and the Indonesian Centre for Environmental Law (ICEL). The UK Department for International Development and the Netherlands Ministry for Development Cooperation have provided co-funding.
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat landsReducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009COP15 December 2009