RECOMMEND Part II Presentation of the RIP Roadmap by Partners: EE, IT, UK & BG 25th Oct. 2013, 4th WS in Poland 25th Oct 2013.

RECOMMEND

Part II

Presentation of the RIP Roadmap

by Partners: EE, IT, UK & BG

25th Oct. 2013, 4th WS in Poland

25th Oct 2013

THE RIP Road Map

• General information about the RIP: Each partner will create an individual RIP for his region The RIP will consist of 2 independent parts

• Roadmap for the RIP- • Regional Implementation Plan -

The Roadmap focuses on the WHY a special good practice or new idea was chosen and WHO and HOW it will be implemented within the partner region

Target of the Road Map presentation at the WS 4:

informing the partners about• your selected action for the RIP

• the reasons / back ground info for your selection

• Which stakeholders will implement your RIP

25th Oct 2013 2

RECOMMEND RIP Road Map

Tartu Regional Energy AgencyMartin Kikas

24th Oct 2013

Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013

Overview: now - then

4

Short description about your challanges which hinder respectively make the implementation of eco friendly actions difficult:

*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx

our solution

Acknowledgement of the businesses to rise motivation

and awareness about the eco-management and eco-

innovation

Please state only key words which describes your best practice example:e.g. establishing a new funding system; establishing a new cluster etc…

Our current situationPlease state key words describing the kind of situation you have to face in your region which hinders eco friendly actions and which will be addressed by your RIP. E.g.lack of funding systems, lack of networking…

Our proposal

Different stakeholders (public and private) have low awareness of eco-innovation and eco-management. Insufficient motivation to implement eco-management systems and eco-innovation tools as it is not seen as a profitable for business.

25th Oct 2013

More info about your planned action

5

Name / Key Words of your selected action you want to implement

Key words as answers are enough….

What is it about To encourage private and public organsations to develop and implement environmental and climate friendly measures

What do you expect to achieve? We expect to see the public and private sectors awareness and motivation to rise and increase the implementation of environmental management systems

Indicators you expect to achieve? Number of participants, complete evaluation procedure

Has someone already tested the practice / idea? If yes, who & where & when?

It was tested at Lower-Austria region

Is it easy to implement? Please explain why or why not

We believe it is achievable because there is a recognition events in Tartu but not about eco-management or eco-innovation

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

6

Stakeholder A

Raimond Tamm, City of Tartu, Deputy Mayor

Main fields of activities of stakeholder organisation

Governance City of Tartu

Priorities and interests of stakeholder in relation to the selected good practice/idea.

Tartu City development plan 2014-2020

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP

60:40

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

7

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B

Toomas Noorem, Tartu Science Park, Managing Director, Memeber of the Board


Tartu Science Park is the oldest science park in the Baltics. For almost 20 years, they have supported business innovation activities in the region by networking with universities, public and private sector.


The vision of Tartu Science Park is to be a originator of new things, to bring different parts together and create synergy


60:40

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

8

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C

Karin Kilk, Estonian Association for Environmental Management, Coordinating Secretary


The main objective of the Association is to bring together enterprises, organisations and individuals, who need help, support and information related to corporate environmental management for solving environmental problems, reducing impact to the environment and ensuring sustainable development of the society


Estonian Association for Environmental Management is eco-management promoter and distributor


70:30

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

9

Yellow circles: supportRed circles: obstacles

Please state in key words which main support and main obstacles /threats/ difficulties you are expecting to face when establishing the RIP in your region.

25th Oct 2013

Promotion possibilities for RIP

10

HOW the RIP & his supporters can be promoted

On regional level Conference, meeting with stakeholders, press releases

On national level

Conference, Articles, press releases

On international level Conference (Field Mission)

Any idea how you resp. the RECOMMEND team can promote the Final RIP on regional / national and / or international level?e.g. signing the RIP at press conference, round table with stakeholders, press release, promoting at international events suchas Open Days…)

25th Oct 2013

TO DO List for the next months

11

MONTH 2013 TO DOs WhoOctober WS in Poland

Martin, Neeme, Tanel

November Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


December Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


MONTH 2014

January Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


February Pilot Acton seminar nr.2


March Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


April Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


May Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


June Finalising RIP and identification of sources of financing


September - Oktober

Field Mission, Workshop, Conference Martin, Neeme, Tanel

25th Oct 2013


Province of Ascoli Piceno (IT)Claudio Carducci

24th Oct 2013

Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013


13



our solution

• To improve an already existing funding system;

• To uniform system for public funds to eco-innovation;

• To raise the awareness of SMEs in using eco-innovation (in term of benefits):

• To inform people about eco-innovation benefits and opportunities in their territory

Our current situation

• Low investment in innovation;• Public funds related to eco-

innovation fragmented;• Current know-how comes from

traditional sectors;• Difficulties for SMEs to clearly

identify eco-innovation improvement measures;

• Still relatively low consciousness of the potential importance of investing in eco-innovation;

• Low level of communication/dissemination of innovative activities.

Our proposal

25th Oct 2013

More info about your planned action (1/2)

14

ITACA PROTOCOL Key words as answers are enough….What is it about System for the evaluation of environmental sustainability

of buildings to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and energy consumption. Each building evaluated receive a score able to identify its eco-energy efficiency.

What do you expect to achieve? To create a regional system for the evaluation and certification of environmental sustainability of buildings in the territory.

Indicators you expect to achieve? n/a


The ITACA protocol is in force in Italy since 2004 although the process to uniform the evaluation system has been started in 2012. Only 11 of the 21 Italian Regional Authorities ratified the protocol.


Yes it is easy because the evaluation system already exist.

25th Oct 2013

More info about your planned action (2/2)

15

Eco-Management Vouchers


What is it about Funding scheme to develop and implement environmental and climate friendly measures among private and public organisations.

What do you expect to achieve? To foster the implementation of environmental and eco-friendly measures in the sector of energy efficient buildings

Indicators you expect to achieve? n/a


The Eco-Management Vouchers have been already experimented in the Lower Austrian Region.


Yes it is, because the idea is adaptable to different sectors and territories. The strength points are: the possibility to apply for small funding; the fluent administration management; the progressive funding system.

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

16

Stakeholder AMr. Minetti Antonio

Head of the “Environment and Territory Department” of the Marche Regional Authority


•Territorial and economic development;•Management of relevant policies/initiatives at local level


• To include good practices in the “Energetic and Environmental Regional Plan”

• To foster eco-innovation in order to improve territorial development

• To communicate to citizens and local SME’s and to other relevant actors (as researchers, entrepreneurs, etc.) eco-innovation benefits.

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP • Low political priority;

• Capacity to adopt Eco- innovation policies and initiatives at local level;

• Ability to communicate to local citizens and SME’s and other relevant actors-researchers, entrepreneurs, etc.

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

17

STAKEHOLDER BStakeholder B

Mr. Michele Santucci

Referent for “TecnoMarche” Science and Technology Park of Marche Region


• Development of strategies and projects to promote innovation in the territory;

• Dissemination of innovation, providing enterprises with information, services and grants (e.g. environmental and quality certification).

• Technical Assistance and technology transfer, advanced services.


•To cooperate with local SMEs to implement the good practice;•To provide training in eco-innovation and management;•To explore future business opportunities.

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP • Lack of interest in the priority;

• Extensive networks of partners and local actors;• Extensive knowledge of the territorial productive

system and sector analysis;• Dissemination of project results.

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

18

STAKEHOLDER CStakeholder C

Mr. Fabio Polonara

Ordinary Professor at the “Energetic Department” of the University of Ancona

Mr. Marco SotteProfessor Assistant


•Higher education Institute focused on research in technologies and Innovation.


• To use eco-innovation in term of knowledge exchange, new researches, etc.

• To influence students and young researchers – future generation of innovators

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP • Lack of interest in the priority;

• Experience in relevant R&D sector;• Ensure on-going dialogue between academic research

and the productive system. • Capacity to disseminate project results and influence

students and young researchers

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

19

Using of already

existing public funds

RIP promoted by a Public Authority

Enhanced relationship with

local stakeholdersLow level of participation

Economic benefits not

identified



Low participation private sector

25th Oct 2013


20


On regional level•Press conferences for the approval of RIP;•Round tables with local stakeholders;•Info days for public awareness;

On national level

•n/a

On international level•Participating in international events shared among RECOMMEND project partners (e.g. Open Days)


25th Oct 2013


21

MONTH 2013 TO DOs Who

October Updating of the „Energetic and Environmental Provincial Plan“ version 2013 (the RIP is included in this documents)

Province of Ascoli Piceno

November Concertation among political authorities Province of Ascoli Piceno

December Final adaptation of the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document) with administrative formal act

Province of Ascoli Piceno

MONTH 2014 January EEPP presentation to the territorial public and stakeholders

Province of Ascoli Piceno and stakeholders interested in EEPP activities

February Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)

Province of Ascoli Piceno and SMEs/organisations involved in activities

March Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


April Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


May Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


June Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


July Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


August Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


25th Oct 2013

RECOMMEND RIP Road MapOpportunity Peterborough

Gareth Jones and Rod Gilchrist

24th October 2013Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013


23



Lack of networking

Low take up of EMS

Little training available to help companies reduce

environment footprint and gain economic benefits

our solution

EMS cluster Club

Improved networking, advice, support and training for key sectors and Fengate

geographical cluster

Reduced environment footprint

Improved EMS take up

Our current situation Our proposal

25th Oct 2013


24



What is it about Grow economy and reduce environmental footprintWhat do you expect to achieve? Growth,companies more efficient, increased EMS

use. Contribute to Environment capital goalIndicators you expect to achieve? Increase in number of companies using EMS,

reduction in environment footprint and sustainable cluster club with increased membershipo


Idea new, builds on Cluster and Investors in Environment programme and Recommend activity


Realistic challenge Peterborough aim to be Home of Environmental Capital

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

25

Stakeholder AKim ColeyBusiness and Environment OfficerPeterborough Environment City Trust


Help create cleaner, greener and healthier Peterborough


Environment Management systems and Greener City


Low risk to hinder . Strong support

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

26

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B Antony GoughRenewables EastDirector Projects and Business Development


Resource Efficiency and Renewable Energy


Resource efficiency EMS


Low risk to hinderStrong support as activity fits organisation priorities

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

27

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C Charlotte PalmerPeterborough City CouncilEnvironment and Community partnerships Officer


Public Authority


Improved local environment and economy


Low risk to hinderStrong support as project fits with Peterborough City Council priorities

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

28

Good capacity and project

management

Strong key partners

Realistic objectives and good fit with local strategies

Business has no

time to implement

Business resistance to

change



Poor company engagement

25th Oct 2013


29


On regional level Launch with key large local company to champion activity Press release Stakeholder event

On national level

Share activity on a regular basis with Department for Business via local representative and Local Enterprise Partnership

On international level Brussels Open Days. Field mission for partners


25th Oct 2013


30


October Finalsie RIP

Rod and Gareth

November Create and develop clusters

Rod, Gareth and external experts

December Data gathering


MONTH 2014

January Launch event


February Training


March Training


April Training


May Training


June Complete training


July Evaluation and report


August Evaluation and report


25th Oct 2013

THE RIP Road Map

• General information about the RIP: Each partner will create an individual RIP for his region The RIP will consist of 2 independent parts

• Roadmap for the RIP- • Regional Implementation Plan -

The Roadmap focuses on the WHY a special good practice or new idea was chosen and WHO and HOW it will be implemented within the partner region

Target of your Road Map presentation: informing the partners about• your selected action for the RIP

• the reasons / back ground info for your selection

• Which stakeholders will implement your RIP

3125th Oct 2013


UBBSLAMariana Ivanova

24th Oct 2013

Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013


33



our solution

- Establishing a new finding system ( Energy efficiency vouchers)- Secure fresh funds for energy

efficiency in households- Expected results with very high

efficiency- Potential to attract and involve high

number of citizens- Potential to replicate in any other

region, town, etc.- Attract and involve local authorities- Opportunity for the owner to take

decision by his own- Opportunity to involve local utility

companies

Our current situation

- Low standartd of living- High energy intesity of households( old fashiopn panel concrete buidlings

without insolation, hing energy consumption, high bills, low living comfort )

- Many owners in one building, actually each apartment have one or more owners

- Difficulties to take a comon decision for any solution, incl. retrofitting of the building

- Low trust in EU programs

Our proposal

25th Oct 2013


34



What is it about Promoting Energy Efficiency Voucher scheme in Varna

What do you expect to achieve? Testing a model with high social impactIndicators you expect to achieve? ...... tonns saved CO2 (carbon emmisions)Has someone already tested the practice / idea? If yes, who & where & when?

No, it will be the pilot test of a very promising idea


It is a pilot model and our hope is to get the support of every important stakeholder, so that to avoid any potential difficulties

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

35

Stakeholder A please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function *) The Mayor of Varna*) District Mayors of Varna*) City councillors of Varna


*) Secure finding of 80 000 EUR for 20 vouchers, each of 4000 EUR*) Implementation of Information campaign*) Promotion of sustainable energy solutions


*) Reduce energy bills*) Increase living comfort


*) Lack of funding recourses*) Lack of understanding of such priority from the desicion makers

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

36

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function *) Local utility companies


*) Providing electricity, heat, gas, water supply


*) To implement the energy efficiency goals, according to the 20-20-20


*) The correlation CO2 emissions/penalties to be paid to the Government in case of no investment in energy efficiency measures*) The Government to not verify the saved CO2 emissions

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

37

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function / *) Local building companies


*) Retrofitting and reconstruction of buildings


*) Interrelation with the main business


*) Lack of resources and lack of capacity to implement the measures in high quality according to the applicable standards

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

38

Secured funds from the city

budget dedicated to the action

Good understanding from the local

decision makers

Expected high support from the

society

Low interest and lack of trust from the beneficieries

Lack of financial sources from the

city budget



Lack of understanding of

the entire idea

25th Oct 2013


39


Presentation during the final project Conference, Presentation in any other event with similar topic

On regional level Presentation and pressconference

On national level

Presentation and pressconference

On international level Presentation and pressconference


25th Oct 2013


40


October worikng meeting with Varna Mayor

UBBSLA team

November working meeting with Varna district Mayors

UBBSLA team

December pressconference to announce the pilot action

UBBSLA team

MONTH 2014

January secure funding of 80 000 euro in Varna city budget

City councillors

February preparation of the action and promotion

UBBSLA team

March promoton of the pilot action and announce

UBBSLA team, city administration

April promotion of the pilot action and announce


May selection of 20 proposal for actions


June Implementing of actions

Building companies

July Implementing of action

Building companies

August announcing the results, pressconference


25th Oct 2013

4125th Oct 2013

RECOMMEND Part II Presentation of the RIP Roadmap by Partners: EE, IT, UK & BG 25th Oct. 2013, 4th WS in Poland 25th Oct 2013.

Documents

ecomanagement systems

rip roadmap

stakeholder a25th

interests of stakeholder

stakeholder b25th

regionthe rip

individual rip

ecoinnovationmy stakeholders