Summary Review by Peter Antal, Ph.D. Institute on Disability, UNH
Jan 13, 2016
Summary Review by Peter Antal, Ph.D.Institute on Disability, UNH
RCs Infrastructure, Care Process,
Publications, Innovative projects, EP, LTFU, Training, Data Collection, Improved Care, Sustainability
NCC Infrastructure, Evaluation,
Collaboration
RCs: Strengthening core approach,
dissemination efforts, providing support for participation, sustainable practice
NCC Sustainable practices and dissemination
efforts
Multiple Challenges for RCs Individual, state, regional, national
NCC Clarification of roles, communication
challenges, nationalization processes, improving collaboration
RCs National, regional, and state level
NCC National and regional
RCs Research to practice, shaping
infrastructure of health care, creation of systems of care
NCC Organizational infrastructure, general
education, focus on financing and workforce, systems change
Improved Infrastructure Communication, coordination, and
collaboration General Improvements
Supporting core projects, new research, public education, standardization of services, disparities in health, process of health care, workforce improvement
Targeted Improvements Documentation, point of care support tools,
telemedicine, linking EMR and NBS, financing
Range of Considerations Clarification, needs assessment,
implication assessment Range of Possibilities
General By Theme Area (life course, public
literacy, provider literacy, public health engagement)
General Support for Staffing and Cross RC
Expansion Review Priority Funding Process Review Supplemental Funding
Process Align Funding and Reporting
Guidelines
Clarify Roles and Priorities Focus on appropriate funding levels
for administration, provision of technical assistance, activity coordination with RCs, and support HRSA focus areas
Unity in HRSA Approach RCC and NCC Collaboration Resource Support for Targeted Areas Address RC and NCC Concerns
Overall Outcomes and Methods for the HRSA, NCC, RC Partnership
Improving the NCC and RC Partnership
System Adaptation Enhanced Expert Use Review of “At Risk” Programs