Top Banner
Radio Propagation CSCI 694 24 September 1999 Lewis Girod
80

Radio propagation

Dec 07, 2014

Download

Engineering

Nguyen Minh Thu

radio propagation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Radio propagation

Radio Propagation

CSCI 694

24 September 1999

Lewis Girod

Page 2: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 2

Outline

• Introduction and terminology

• Propagation mechanisms

• Propagation models

Page 3: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 3

What is Radio?

• Radio Xmitter induces E&M fields– Electrostatic field components 1/d3

– Induction field components 1/d2

– Radiation field components 1/d

• Radiation field has E and B component– Field strength at distance d = EB 1/d2

– Surface area of sphere centered at transmitter

Page 4: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 4

General Intuition

• Two main factors affecting signal at receiver– Distance (or delay) Path attenuation – Multipath Phase differences

Green signal travels 1/2 farther than Yellow to reach receiver, who sees Red. For 2.4 GHz, (wavelength) =12.5cm.

Page 5: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 5

Objective

• Invent models to predict what the field looks like at the receiver. – Attenuation, absorption, reflection, diffraction...– Motion of receiver and environment…– Natural and man-made radio interference...– What does the field look like at the receiver?

Page 6: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 6

Models are Specialized

• Different scales– Large scale (averaged over meters)– Small scale (order of wavelength)

• Different environmental characteristics– Outdoor, indoor, land, sea, space, etc.

• Different application areas– macrocell (2km), microcell(500m), picocell

Page 7: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 7

Outline

• Introduction and some terminology

• Propagation Mechanisms

• Propagation models

Page 8: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 8

Radio Propagation Mechanisms

• Free Space propagation

• Refraction– Conductors & Dielectric materials (refraction)

• Diffraction– Fresnel zones

• Scattering– “Clutter” is small relative to wavelength

Page 9: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 9

Free Space

• Assumes far-field (Fraunhofer region) – d >> D and d >> , where

• D is the largest linear dimension of antenna is the carrier wavelength

• No interference, no obstructions

Page 10: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 10

Free Space Propagation Model

• Received power at distance d is

– where Pt is the transmitter power in Watts

– a constant factor K depends on antenna gain, a system loss factor, and the carrier wavelength

Watts)(2d

PKdP t

r

Page 11: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 11

Refraction

• Perfect conductors reflect with no attenuation

• Dielectrics reflect a fraction of incident energy– “Grazing angles” reflect max*– Steep angles transmit max*

r

t

• Reflection induces 180 phase shift

*The exact fraction depends on the materials and frequencies involved

Page 12: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 12

Diffraction

• Diffraction occurs when waves hit the edge of an obstacle– “Secondary” waves propagated

into the shadowed region– Excess path length results in

a phase shift– Fresnel zones relate phase shifts

to the positions of obstacles

TR

1st Fresnel zone

Obstruction

Page 13: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 13

Fresnel Zones

• Bounded by elliptical loci of constant delay

• Alternate zones differ in phase by 180– Line of sight (LOS) corresponds to 1st zone– If LOS is partially blocked, 2nd zone can

destructively interfere (diffraction loss)

Fresnel zones are ellipses with the T&R at the foci; L1 = L2+

Path 1

Path 2

Page 14: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 14

Power Propagated into Shadow

• How much power is propagated this way?– 1st FZ: 5 to 25 dB below free space prop.

Obstruction of Fresnel Zones 1st 2nd

0-10-20-30-40-50-60

0o

90

180o

dB

Tip of Shadow

Obstruction

LOS

Rappaport, pp. 97

Page 15: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 15

Scattering

• Rough surfaces– critical height for bumps is f(,incident angle) – scattering loss factor modeled with Gaussian

distribution.

• Nearby metal objects (street signs, etc.)– Usually modelled statistically

• Large distant objects– Analytical model: Radar Cross Section (RCS)

Page 16: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 16

Outline

• Introduction and some terminology

• Propagation Mechanisms

• Propagation models– Large scale propagation models– Small scale propagation (fading) models

Page 17: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 17

Propagation Models: Large

• Large scale models predict behavior averaged over distances >> – Function of distance & significant environmental

features, roughly frequency independent– Breaks down as distance decreases– Useful for modeling the range of a radio system

and rough capacity planning

Page 18: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 18

Propagation Models: Small

• Small scale (fading) models describe signal variability on a scale of – Multipath effects (phase cancellation)

dominate, path attenuation considered constant– Frequency and bandwidth dependent – Focus is on modeling “Fading”: rapid change in

signal over a short distance or length of time.

Page 19: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 19

Large Scale Models

• Path loss models

• Outdoor models

• Indoor models

Page 20: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 20

Free Space Path Loss

• Path Loss is a measure of attenuation based only on the distance to the transmitter

• Free space model only valid in far-field; – Path loss models typically define a “close-in”

point d0 and reference other points from there:

2

00 )()(

d

ddPdP rr

dB

dBr d

ddPLdPdPL

00 2)()]([)(

What is dB?

Page 21: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 21

Log-Distance Path Loss Model

• Log-distance generalizes path loss to account for other environmental factors

• Choose a d0 in the far field.

• Measure PL(d0) or calculate Free Space Path Loss.

• Take measurements and derive empirically.

dBd

ddPLdPL

00 )()(

Page 22: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 22

Log-Distance 2

• Value of characterizes different environments

Environment Exponent

Free Space 2Urban area 2.7-3.5Shadowed urban area 3-5Indoor LOS 1.6-1.8Indoor no LOS 4-6

Rappaport, Table 3.2, pp. 104

Page 23: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 23

Log-Normal Shadowing Model

• Shadowing occurs when objects block LOS between transmitter and receiver

• A simple statistical model can account for unpredictable “shadowing” – Add a 0-mean Gaussian RV to Log-Distance PL– Markov model can be used for spatial correlation

Page 24: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 24

Outdoor Models

• “2-Ray” Ground Reflection model

• Diffraction model for hilly terrain

Page 25: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 25

2-Ray Ground Reflection

• For d >> hrht,

– low angle of incidence allows the earth to act as a reflector

– the reflected signal is 180 out of phase

– Pr 1/d4 (=4)

RT

ht hr

Phase shift!

Page 26: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 26

Ground Reflection 2

• Intuition: ground blocks 1st Fresnel zone– Reflection causes an instantaneous 180 phase shift– Additional phase offset due to excess path length– If the resulting phase is still close to 180, the gound ray will

destructively interfere with the LOS ray.

RT

ht hrp1

p0

180

Page 27: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 27

Hilly Terrain

• Propagation can be LOS or result of diffraction over one or more ridges

• LOS propagation modelled with ground reflection: diffraction loss

• But if there is no LOS, diffraction can actually help!

Page 28: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 28

Indoor Path Loss Models

• Indoor models are less generalized– Environment comparatively more dynamic

• Significant features are physically smaller

– Shorter distances are closer to near-field– More clutter, scattering, less LOS

Page 29: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 29

Indoor Modeling Techniques

• Modeling techniques and approaches:– Log-Normal, <2 for LOS down corridor– Log-Normal shadowing model if no LOS– Partition and floor attenuation factors– Computationally intensive “ray-tracing” based

on 3-D model of building and attenuation factors for materials

Page 30: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 30

Outline

• Introduction and some terminology

• Propagation Mechanisms

• Propagation models– Large scale propagation models– Small scale propagation (fading) models

Page 31: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 31

Recall: Fading Models

• Small scale (fading) models describe signal variability on a scale of – Multipath effects (phase cancellation)

dominate, path attenuation considered constant– Frequency and bandwidth dependent – Focus is on modeling “Fading”: rapid change in

signal over a short distance or length of time.

Page 32: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 32

Factors Influencing Fading

• Motion of the receiver: Doppler shift

• Transmission bandwidth of signal– Compare to BW of channel

• Multipath propagation– Receiver sees multiple instances of signal when

waves follow different paths– Very sensitive to configuration of environment

Page 33: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 33

Effects of Multipath Signals

• Rapid change in signal strength due to phase cancellation

• Frequency modulation due to Doppler shifts from movement of receiver/environment

• Echoes caused by multipath propagation delay

Page 34: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 34

The Multipath Channel

• One approach to small-scale models is to model the “Multipath Channel” – Linear time-varying function h(t,)

• Basic idea: define a filter that encapsulates the effects of multipath interference– Measure or calculate the channel impulse response

(response to a short pulse at fc):

h(t,) t

Page 35: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 35

Channel Sounding

• “Channel sounding” is a way to measure the channel response– transmit impulse, and measure the response to find

h(). – h() can then be used to model the channel response to

an arbitrary signal: y(t) = x(t)h().– Problem: models the channel at single point in time;

can’t account for mobility or environmental changes

h(t,)

SKIP

Page 36: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 36

Characterizing Fading*

• From the impulse response we can characterize the channel:

• Characterizing distortion– Delay spread (d): how long does the channel

ring from an impulse?

– Coherence bandwidth (Bc): over what frequency range is the channel gain flat?

d1/Bc

*Adapted from EE535 Slides, Chugg ‘99

In time domain, roughly corresponds to the “fidelity” of the response; sharper pulse requires wider band

Page 37: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 37

Effect of Delay Spread*

• Does the channel distort the signal?– if W << Bc: “Flat Fading”

• Amplitude and phase distortion only

– if W > Bc: “Frequency Selective Fading”

• If T < d, inter-symbol interference (ISI) occurs

• For narrowband systems (W 1/T), FSF ISI.

• Not so for wideband systems (W >> 1/T)

For a system with bw W and symbol time T...

Page 38: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 38

Qualitative Delay Spread

RMS Delay spread ()

Mean excess delay

Noise threshold

Delay

Pow

er(d

B)

Typical values for :Indoor: 10-100 nsOutdoor: 0.1-10 s

Page 39: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 39

Characterizing Fading 2*

• Characterizing Time-variation: How does the impulse response change with time?– Coherence time (tc): for what value of are

responses at t and t+ uncorrelated? (How quickly is the channel changing)

– Doppler Spread (fd): How much will the spectrum of the input be spread in frequency?

– fd1/tc

Page 40: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 40

Effect of Coherence Time*

• Is the channel constant over many uses?– if T << tc: “Slow fading”

• Slow adaptation required

– if T > tc: “Fast fading”• Frequent adaptation required

• For typical systems, symbol rate is high compared to channel evolution

For a system with bw W and symbol time T...

Page 41: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 41

Statistical Fading Models

• Fading models model the probability of a fade occurring at a particular location– Used to generate an impulse response

– In fixed receivers, channel is slowly time-varying; the fading model is reevaluated at a rate related to motion

• Simplest models are based on the WSSUS principle

Page 42: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 42

WSSUS*

• Wide Sense Stationary (WSS)– Statistics are independent of small perturbations in time

and position

– I.e. fixed statistical parameters for stationary nodes

• Uncorrelated Scatter (US)– Separate paths are not correlated in phase or attenuation

– I.e. multipath components can be independent RVs

• Statistics modeled as Gaussian RVs

Page 43: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 43

Common Distributions

• Rayleigh fading distribution– Models a flat fading signal– Used for individual multipath components

• Ricean fading distribution– Used when there is a dominant signal

component, e.g. LOS + weaker multipaths– parameter K (dB) defines strength of dominant

component; for K=-, equivalent to Rayleigh

Page 44: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 44

Application of WSSUS

• Multi-ray Rayleigh fading:– The Rayleigh distribution does not model

multipath time delay (frequency selective)– Multi-ray model is the sum of two or more

independent time-delayed Rayleigh variables

s(t)

R1

R2 r(t)

Rappaport, Fig. 4.24, pp. 185.

Page 45: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 45

Saleh & Valenzuela (1987)

• Measured same-floor indoor characteristics– Found that, with a fixed receiver, indoor

channel is very slowly time-varying– RMS delay spread: mean 25ns, max 50ns– With no LOS, path loss varied over 60dB range

and obeyed log distance power law, 3 > n > 4

• Model assumes a structure and models correlated multipath components.

Rappaport, pp. 188

Page 46: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 46

Saleh & Valenzuela 2

• Multipath model– Multipath components arrive in clusters, follow Poisson

distribution. Clusters relate to building structures.

– Within cluster, individual components also follow Poisson distribution. Cluster components relate to reflecting objects near the TX or RX.

– Amplitudes of components are independent Rayleigh variables, decay exponentially with cluster delay and with intra-cluster delay

Page 47: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 47

References

• Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Chapters 3 and 4, T. Rappaport, Prentice Hall, 1996.

• Principles of Mobile Communication, Chapter 2, G. Stüber, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.

• Slides for EE535, K. Chugg, 1999.

• Spread Spectrum Systems, Chapter 7, R. Dixon, Wiley, 1985 (there is a newer edition).

• Wideband CDMA for Third Generation Mobile Communications, Chapter 4, T. Ojanpera, R. Prasad, Artech, House 1998.

• Propagation Measurements and Models for Wireless Communications Channels, Andersen, Rappaport, Yoshida, IEEE Communications, January 1995.

Page 48: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 48

The End

Page 49: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 49

Scattering 2

• hc is the critical height of a protrusion to result in scattering.

• RCS: ratio of power density scattered to receiver to power density incident on the scattering object– Wave radiated through free space to scatterer and reradiated:

)sin(θ 8

λ

i

ch

)log(20)log(20)π4log(30

]dB[)λlog(20)dBi()dBm()dBm( 2

RT

TTR

dd

mRCSGPP

Page 50: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 50

Free Space 2a

• Free space power flux density (W/m2)– power radiated over surface area of sphere

– where Gt is transmitter antenna gain

• By covering some of this area, receiver’s antenna “catches” some of this flux

2π4 d

GPP tt

d

Page 51: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 51

Free Space 2b

• Fraunhofer distance: d > 2D2/

• Antenna gain and antenna aperture– Ae is the antenna aperture, intuitively the area

of the antenna perpendicular to the flux– Gr is the antenna gain for a receiver. It is related to Ae.

– Received power (Pr) = Power flux density (Pd) * Ae

π4 eAG

π4

λ 2GAe

Page 52: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 52

Free Space 2c

– where L is a system loss factor

– Pt is the transmitter power

– Gt and Gr are antenna gains

is the carrier wavelength

Watts)π(4

λ 1)(

2

2

2 L

GGP

ddP rtt

r

Page 53: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 53

LNSM 2

• PL(d)[dB] = PL(d0) +10nlog(d/d0)+ X

– where X is a zero-mean Gaussian RV (dB)

and n computed from measured data, based on linear regression

Page 54: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 54

Ground Reflection 1.5

• The power at the receiver in this model is– derivation calculates E field;

– Pr = |E|2Ae; Ae is ant. aperture

• The “breakpoint” at which the model changes from 1/d2 to 1/d4 is 2hthr/– where hr and ht are the receiver and transmitter

antenna heights

4

22

d

hhGGPP rt

rttr

Page 55: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 55

Convolution Integral

• Convolution is defined by this integral:

τ)τ()τ()(

)()()(

dthxty

thtxty

Indexes relevant portion of impulse response

Scales past input signal

Page 56: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 56

Partition Losses

• Partition losses: same floor– Walls, furniture, equipment– Highly dependent on type of material, frequency

• Hard partitions vs soft partitions– hard partitions are structural– soft partitions do not reach ceiling

• “open plan” buildings

Page 57: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 57

Partition Losses 2

• Partition losses: between floors– Depends on building construction, frequency– “Floor attenuation factor” diminishes with

successive floors– typical values:

• 15 dB for 1st floor

• 6-10 dB per floor for floors 2-5

• 1-2 dB per floor beyond 5 floors

Page 58: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 58

Materials

• Attenuation values for different materialsMaterial Loss (dB) Frequency

Concrete block 13-20 1.3 GHz

Plywood (3/4”) 2 9.6 GHz

Plywood (2 sheets) 4 9.6 GHz

Plywood (2 sheets) 6 28.8 GHz

Aluminum siding 20.4 815 MHz

Sheetrock (3/4”) 2 9.6 GHz

Sheetrock (3/4”) 5 57.6 GHz

Turn corner in corridor 10-15 1.3 GHz

Page 59: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 59

What does “dB” mean?

• dB stands for deciBel or 1/10 of a Bel

• The Bel is a dimensionless unit for expressing ratios and gains on a log scale

• Gains add rather than multiply

• Easier to handle large dynamic ranges

))log()(log(10log10P

P12

1

210

dB1

2 PPP

P

Page 60: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 60

dB 2

• Ex: Attenuation from transmitter to receiver.– PT=100, PR=10

– attenuation is ratio of PT to PR

– [PT/PR]dB = 10 log(PT/PR) = 10 log(10) = 10 dB

• Useful numbers:

– [1/2]dB -3 dB

– [1/1000]dB = -30 dB

Page 61: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 61

dB 3

• dB can express ratios, but what about absolute quantities?

• Similar units reference an absolute quantity against a defined reference.– [n mW]dBm = [n/mW]dB

– [n W]dBW = [n/W]dB

• Ex: [1 mW]dBW = -30 dBW

Page 62: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 62

Channel Sounding 2

• Several “Channel Sounding” techniques can measure the channel response directly:– Direct RF pulse (we hinted at this approach)– Sliding correlator– Frequency domain sounding

Page 63: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 63

Channel Sounding 3

• Direct RF Pulse– Xmit pulse, scope displays response at receiver– Can be done with off-the-shelf hardware– Problems: hard to reject noise in the channel – If no LOS

• must trigger scope on weaker multipath component

• may fail to trigger

• lose delay and phase information

Page 64: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 64

Channel Sounding 4

• Sliding correlator– Xmit PseudoNoise sequence– Rcvr correlates signal with its PN generator– Rcvr clock slightly slower; PN sequences slide – Delayed components cause delayed correlations– Good resolution, good noise rejection

Page 65: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 65

Channel Sounding 5

• Frequency domain sounding– Sweep frequency range– Compute inverse Fourier transform of response– Problems

• not instantaneous measurement

• Tradeoff between resolution (number of frequency steps) and real-time measurement (i.e. duration as short as possible)

Page 66: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 66

Digression: Convolutions

• The impulse response “box” notation implies the convolution operator, – Convolution operates on a signal and an

impulse response to produce a new signal. – The new signal is the superposition of the

response to past values of the signal.– Commutative, associative

Page 67: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 67

y(t)

y(t)

Convolutions 2

• y(t) is the sum of scaled, time-delayed responses

x(t) h(t) =

+

h(t)

Each component of the sum is scaled by the x(t)dt at that point; in this example, the response is scaled to 0 where x(t) = 0.

Page 68: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 68

Flip & Slide: h(t-)h(t-) Flip & Slide: h(t-)h(t-) Flip & Slide: h(t-)h(t-)

Convolutions 3

• Graphical method: “Flip & Slide”

x(t)

x()

h(t) =

Pairwise multiply x*hand integrate over

and Store y(t)

y(t)

y(t)

Flip & Slide: h(t-)h(t-) Flip & Slide: h(t-)h(t-)

Page 69: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 69

Frequency and Time Domains

• The channel impulse response is f(time)– It describes the channel in the “time domain”

• Functions of frequency are often very useful;– Space of such functions is “frequency domain”

• Often a particular characteristic is easier to handle in one domain or the other.

Page 70: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 70

Frequency Domain

• Functions of frequency– usually capitalized and take the parameter “f”– where f is the frequency in radians/sec– and the value of the function is the amplitude of

the component of frequency f.

• Convolution in time domain translates into multiplication in the frequency domain: – y(t) = x(t)h(t) Y(f) = X(f)H(f)

Page 71: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 71

Frequency Domain 2

• Based on Fourier theorem: – any periodic signal can be decomposed into a

sum of (possibly infinite number of) cosines

• The Fourier Transform and inverse FT– Convert between time and frequency domains.– The frequency and time representations of the

same signal are “duals”

Page 72: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 72

Flat Fading

• T >> d and W << BC minimal ISI

0 Ts 0 0 Ts+

fc fcfc

t t t

f f f

s(t) r(t)h(t,)

Time domain(convolve)

Freq domain(filter)

=

=

Delay spread

Coherence BW

Page 73: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 73

Frequency Selective Fading

• T << d and W >> BC ISI

0 Ts 0 0 Ts+

fc fcfc

t t

f f f

s(t) r(t)h(t,)

Time domain(convolve)

Freq domain(filter)

=

=

Delay spread

Coherence BW

Ts

Page 74: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 74

Review

• Object of radio propagation models:– predict signal quality at receiver

• Radio propagation mechanisms– Free space (1/d2)– Diffraction– Refraction– Scattering

Page 75: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 75

Review 2

• Factors influencing received signal– Path loss: distance, obstructions– Multipath interference: phase cancellation due

to excess path length and other sources of phase distortion

– Doppler shift– Other radio interference

Page 76: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 76

Review 3

• Approaches to Modelling– Models valid for far-field, apply to a range of

distances– large scale models: concerned with gross

behavior as a function of distance– small scale (fading) models: concerned with

behavior during perturbations around a particular distance

Page 77: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 77

Relevance to Micronets

• Micronets may require different models than most of the work featured here– Smaller transmit range– Likely to be near reflectors: on desk or floor.

• On the other hand, at smaller scales things are less smooth: “ground reflection” may turn into scattering

– Outdoors, throwing sensors on ground may not work. Deployable tripods?

Page 78: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 78

Relevance 2

• Consequences of “Fading”– You can be in a place that has no signal, but

where a signal can be picked up a short distance away in any direction

• Ability to move? Switch frequencies/antennas? Call for help moving or for more nodes to be added?

• If stuck, may not be worth transmitting at all

– Reachability topology may be completely irrelevant to location relationships

Page 79: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 79

Relevance 3

• Relevant modelling tools:– Statistical models (Rice/Rayleigh/Log Normal)

• Statistical fading assumes particular dynamics, this depends on mobility of receivers and environment

– CAD modelling of physical environment and ray tracing approaches.

• For nodes in fixed positions this is only done once.

Page 80: Radio propagation

17 March 1999 Radio Propagation 80

Relevance 4

• An approach to modelling? – Characterize wireless system interactions with

different materials, compare to published data

– Assess the effect of mobility in environment on fixed topologies, relate to statistical models

– Try to determine what environmental structures and parameters are most important:

• Scattering vs. ground reflection?

• can a simple CAD model help?