-
10001886:1999-12-20
12nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Quantifying Fretting Damage Using a Contact-Evolution Based
Modelling Approach
Jian (Kenny) Ding, Sean Leen, Phil Shipway, Tom Hyde
School of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering,
University Technology Centre in Gas Turbine Transmission
Systems
University of Nottingham, UK
-
10001886:1999-12-20
22nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Nottingham UTC in Gas Turbine Transmission Systems
Study of Spline Couplings
• Experimentally characterise the fretting behaviour of
splines using scaled-down spline and/or representative
specimens
• Develop lifing methodologies for spline against fretting
Spline Joints
• Improved lifing methods
• Fretting fatigue & wear modelling
• Assessment of coatings & alternative materials
Support structures
• Super plastic forming
• Robotic plasma arc welding
• Weld distortion
RFW Process Modelling
• Dual-alloy shafts
• Other components
Shaft Plain Section
• Buckling
• Damage tolerant design
• TiMMC technology
Spline Joints
• Improved lifing methods
• Fretting fatigue & wear modelling
• Assessment of coatings & alternative materials
Support structures
• Super plastic forming
• Robotic plasma arc welding
• Weld distortion
RFW Process Modelling
• Dual-alloy shafts
• Other components
Shaft Plain Section
• Buckling
• Damage tolerant design
• TiMMC technology
Spline fretting failure
-
10001886:1999-12-20
32nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Contact-evolution based lifing methodology
• An approach that considers transient interaction between wear
and fatigue under fretting, especially the effect of wear on
fatigue life.
• Contact-evolution based lifing approach comprises: o A finite
element wear simulation tool to determine the evolution of
contact geometry. o Damage Accumulation approach for crack
nucleation.
• Ongoing EPSEC project in collaboration with Oxford (total
grant ~0.6 Millions)
cracking
(partial slip)
Displacement amplitude, μm
wear
(gross sliding)
cracking+ wear
Norm
al forc
e, N
(mixed regime)
Fretting Map *
cracking
(partial slip)
Displacement amplitude, μm
wear
(gross sliding)
cracking+ wear
Norm
al forc
e, N
(mixed regime)
Fretting Map *
Displacement amplitude, μm
wear
(gross sliding)
cracking+ wear
Norm
al forc
e, N
(mixed regime)
Fretting Map *
wear
(gross sliding)
cracking+ wear
Norm
al forc
e, N
(mixed regime)
Fretting Map *
Gross slidingPartial SlipStick Reciproc.sliding
Slip amplitude ( m)�
We
ar
rate
(m/N
m)
3
Fa
tig
ue
life
(cy
cle
s)
107
106
105
10-16
10-15
10-14
1 3 10 30 100 300 1000
Fatigue
life
(cyc
les)
Wea
r ra
te (
m3/N
m)
Gross slidingPartial SlipStick Reciproc.sliding
Slip amplitude ( m)�
We
ar
rate
(m/N
m)
3
Fa
tig
ue
life
(cy
cle
s)
107
106
105
10-16
10-15
10-14
1 3 10 30 100 300 1000
Fatigue
life
(cyc
les)
Wea
r ra
te (
m3/N
m)
-
10001886:1999-12-20
42nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Modelling Framework
The approach integrates a number of ‘tools’.
o Fretting wear tool is central, which predicts the extent of
wear damage and the concomitant change of contact geometry
o For each wear step n, accumulated fatigue damage is calculated
by fatigue parameter Smith-Woston-Topper; thus, total accumulated
damage is given by
All cycles completed ?
Calculate wear depth increment by modified Archard’s
equation
NO
Yes
Output results
FE analysis of fretting contact
Calculate cumulative fatigue damage of the load step
Update contact geometry
Initial parameters• Contact geometry• Applied loads• Wear
coefficient & friction coefficient
∑Δ
=
=
Δ=
NN
n
n fnc
T
NND
1∑Δ
=
=
=NN
n
n ni
T
N1 ,
1ϖ
Archard’s Wear equation:
),(),(),( txdstxpktxdh ii ××=
-
10001886:1999-12-20
52nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Normal load -120 N/mm Stoke - 20 μm
Gross slip case
Worn surface profile (after 5000 cycles)
Original surface profile
Partial slip case
Normal load -120 N/mm Stoke - 5 μm
Contact width increase markedly from Hertz
prediction
Fretting Wear Modelling
(Ding et al, Int J of Fatigue, 2004)
Little change of contact size, wear occurring at slip zone
-
10001886:1999-12-20
62nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
0200400600800
100012001400
-0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15
Hoizontal position (mm)C
onta
ct p
ress
ure
(MPa
)
0 cycle
1000 cycles
5000 cycles
0100200300400500600700800900
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4
Hoizontal position (mm)
Con
tact
pre
ssur
e (M
Pa)
0 cycle
1000 cycle
5000 cycle
Normal load -120 N/mm Stoke - 20 μm
Partial slip case
Normal load -120 N/mmStoke - 5 μm
Fretting Wear Modelling
Evolution of contact pressure
Gross slip case
-
10001886:1999-12-20
72nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Contact-evolution based prediction of crack nucleation (I) gross
sliding
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800
surface height (μm)
Horizontal position (μm)
Predicted profileMeasured profile
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6x/a
SWT (MPa)0 cycle
10000 cycle20000 cycle80000 cycle
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 20000 40000 60000 80000Number of fretting cycles
SWT (MPa)
x/a=0.90
x/a=1.24
x/a=1.75
SWT snapshots
Sample SWT evolutions
Ti-6Al-4V
-
10001886:1999-12-20
82nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Contact-evolution based prediction of crack nucleation (II)
partial slip
-0.005-0.004-0.003
-0.002-0.001
0-2 -1 0 1 2
x/a
Wear depth (mm)
25, 000 cycle150,000 cycle300,000 cycle
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 100000 200000 300000Number of cycles
SWT (MPa)x/a = 1x/a = 0.7 x/a = 0.8 x/a = 0.4
Sample SWT evolutionsWear scar evolution
50μm
Slip Stick Slip
Slip Stick Slip
Ti-6Al-4V
-
10001886:1999-12-20
92nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Contact-evolution based prediction of crack nucleation (II)
partial slip
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Horizontal position (mm)
Contact pressure (MPa)
50 μm50 μm50 μm50 μm
300000th cycle150000th cycle75000th cycle30000th cycle0th
cycle
Complex pressure evolution predicted due to plasticity
effects
Multiple cracking locationso x ≈ ± 0.11 mm (light blue)o x ≈ ±
0.04 mm (red)o x ≈ ± 0.13 mm (yellow)
x ≈ ± 0.13 mmo Initial Hertzian contact edgeo early cycles, low
COF: gross sliding (N < 3k)
x ≈ ± 0.04 mmo ~ initial stick-slip boundarieso late cycles (N ≈
150k-300k)
x ≈ ± 0.11 mmo intermediate cycles (3k < N < 150k)o due to
flat indenter type pressure peaks
-
10001886:1999-12-20
102nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Prediction vs. tests (Madge et al, 2007)
Effect of slip amplitude on fretting fatigue is captured by
taking into account how wear affects fatigue damage parameter.
Effect of slip amplitude on fretting fatigue
-
10001886:1999-12-20
112nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Cyclic Plasticity in Fretting
Prager linear kinematic hardeningMaterial: Ti-6Al-4V (α +
β)Coefficient of friction – 0.9
EE
σ
ε
EE
σ
ε
EE
σ
EE
σ
εε
EE
σratchetting strain,
rεΔ
σ2
σ1
EE
σ2
ε2|x|
Initial yield locus Subsequent
translated yield locus
σ2
σ1
EE
σ2
ε2|x|
Initial yield locus Subsequent
translated yield locus
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018
Strain
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
E = 115 GPa
c = 7317 MPa
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018
Strain
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018
Strain
Stre
ss (M
Pa)
E = 115 GPa
c = 7317 MPa
Plastic shakedownsteady reversed cyclic
plastic strains
Ratchettingplastic strain magnitude
increases continually with load cycling
-
10001886:1999-12-20
122nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Fretting cycles
Plas
tic s
trai
n
p22ε
p11ε
p12ε
p
c
N
ir
r
εε∑ =Δ
Cyclic Plasticity in Partial Slip
Nominal Hertzian geometry elastic Wear simulation with
plasticity ratchetting phenomenon Possibility of damage/cracking
due to ductility exhaustion
rij
rijr εεε ΔΔ=Δ 3
2
Predicted wear-induced evolution of plastic strains at final
stick-slip interface
-
10001886:1999-12-20
132nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x (mm)
p
3000th cycle75000th cycle150000th cycle300000th cycle
• Gross sliding: shear-dominant plasticity
• g.s. plasticity take a W-shape
• Wearing away of plasticity reduction in equivalent plastic
strain
FE-predicted plastic strain in surface layer
Cyclic Plasticity in Gross Sliding
-
10001886:1999-12-20
142nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Conclusions and Future Challenges
• Contact-evolution based fretting lifing methodology
provides
o an integrated solution for fretting wear and fatigue
prediction.
o a convincing explanation about the effects of slip amplitude
on fretting fatigue
• Future challenges:o Incorporate near-surface effects into
fretting fatigue
prediction, such as asperity, oxidation, plasticity and debris
accumulation. How important are they for fretting crack
nucleation?
o Fretting contact mechanics under micro or nano scales.
-
10001886:1999-12-20
152nd Workshop on Joints Modelling, Dartington Hall,
Totnes, Devon, UK 26-29 April 2009
Contact-evolution based prediction of crack nucleation (I) gross
sliding
∑==
=
NNn
n ni
T
NNΔ Δϖ
1 ,
cbniff
bni
fnia )N'('εσ)N(E
')(σεσ ++= ,
2,
2
,max 22)( Δ
Crack nucleation defined to occur at material point i when
accumulated damage ω reaches value of 1, where ω is defined as
:
Each Ni,n is calculated based on a critical-plane fatigue damage
parameter Smith-Watson-Topper (SWT). -25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800
surface height (μm)
Horizontal position (μm)
Predicted profileMeasured profile
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6x/a
SWT (MPa)0 cycle
10000 cycle20000 cycle80000 cycle
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 20000 40000 60000 80000Number of fretting cycles
SWT (MPa)
x/a=0.90
x/a=1.24
x/a=1.75
SWT snapshots
Sample SWT evolutions
Ti-6Al-4V
Quantifying Fretting Damage Using a Contact-Evolution Based
Modelling ApproachNottingham UTC in Gas Turbine Transmission
SystemsContact-evolution based lifing methodologyModelling
FrameworkContact-evolution based prediction of crack nucleation
�(I) gross slidingContact-evolution based prediction of crack
nucleation �(II) partial slipContact-evolution based prediction of
crack nucleation �(II) partial slipConclusions and Future
ChallengesContact-evolution based prediction of crack nucleation
�(I) gross sliding