Benchmark Works E-mail 2007
Sep 16, 2014
Benchmark Works E-mail 2007
BenchmarkingThe definition
Benchmarking is the search and implementation of best practices
Benchmarking is systematic research into the performance and the underlying processes and methods of one or more leading reference organizations in a certain field, and the comparison of one’s own performance and operating methods with these ‘‘best practices’’, with the goal of locating and improving one’s own performance.
Benchmark worksOur interpretation
1. Results Comparison
Campaign by Campaign & Client by Client
2. Analysis of differences &
Interpretation3. Integration of the
Learnings within future Campaigns
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing
Status
1780 actions from 2007 analysed More then 13 million individual
E-mails Results of 1st half of 2008 are also
available
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing
Glossary
Unsubscribe rate. Is an indicator if the product/brand still fits the expectations & the values of the customer. Formula = Unsubscribers / (Sent – bounces).
Bounce rate. Indicates the % of e-mails that did not reach the customers. Hard Bounces includes for example wrong e-mail addresses. Soft bounces mainly concerns Out of Office replies.
Open rate. The ratio between the total number of opened e-mails and the the total number of delivered e-mails (sent-bounces)
Click-through rate (CTR). The ratio between the number of unique ‘clicks’ and the total number of delivered e-mails.
Click-to-Open rate (CTO). The ratio between the number of unique ‘clicks’ and the total number of opened e-mails
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
BtoB vs BtoC
2007 BtoB BtoCUnsubsribe Rate 0,1 0,1Bounce Rate 10,5 9,3Open rate 26,1 34,9CTR 6,9 13,4CTO 26,4 38,4
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Day in the week
B2B e-mails are best sent on Friday. Open Rate & CTR are the highest (36 and 12%, instead of 25 and 6,5% on Tuesday). Also the Unsubscribe rate is lower. Although the Bounce rate is higher on Friday (14% vs. 6% on Tuesday).
B2B-emails are better not sent on a Wednesday. Open rate and CTR are clearly lower & Bounce and Unsubscribe rate higher
+
_
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Day in the week
For B2C-e-mail conclusions are less obvious. Open rate is the highest on Thursday and the lowest on Tuesday.
CTR on the contrary is the highest on Tuesday and lower at the end of the week. But then Bounce rate and Unsubscribe rate are lower. In addition differences are not that significant as they are in B2B.
Monday seems to be not really the moment to sent out. Open rate and CTR is lower, while Bounce rate and Unsubscribe rate are higher.
_
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Type of action
Most common type of actions in B2B are product launches, e-newsletters en e-promotions (in each case 30% of the volume).
B2B e-mails are the most successful for product launches. Open rate (40%) and CTR (13%) are the highest.
E-promotions shows results that are clearly less good. (Open rate of 26%, CTR of only 2 %)
+
_
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Type of action
In B2C 55% of the sent volume are promo newsletters, 20% info newsletters and 15% contests.
The info newsletters are the most successful with an Open Rate of 48% and a CTR of 25%.
Promo newsletters are less successful (Open rate of 32% and a CTR of 13%). Also the Unsubscribe rate is clearly higher (0,2 in stead of 0,1%).
_
+
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Call to Action
In B2B 65% of the volume is realized in campaigns where customers could participate a contest. In 30% of the volume ‘subscription for an event’ was the CTA.
For E-mails with a CTA ‘Subscription’ Open Rates were clearly higher (48%) , as were CTR (30%). Unsubscribe rates were lower.
E-mails asking consumers for information and campaigns without a clear CTA had lower Open rates (24%).
+
_
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Call to Action
Most common used CTA in B2C was a mix of ‘Request for information’ and ‘subscription’
This CTA is also the most successful with an Open rate’ of 49% and a CTR of 22%..
E-mails asking Consumers for data have a less good Open rate (29%), as are e-mails with a e-commerce offer (32% Open rate). Also CTR is clearly lower in these cases and Unsubscribe rate higher.
_
+
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Language
Dutch B2B e-mails have a higher Open rate then the French (30% vs. 27%) and a higher CTR (8% vs. 7%). English e-mails have rates that are even lower.
In B2C French e-mails have a higher Open rate then the Dutch (44 vs. 40%) and a higher CTR (20% vs. 15%). English e-mails have a Open rate & CTR that is far lower.
_
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Sector
In B2B campaigns conclusions are not easy to make because of the differences between Open Rates and CTR by sector.
For B2C e-mail campaigns are more successful in sectors as Laundry & Household products, ICT, Telco, Finance and HR.
Lower rates we see in Office, Cars, Food, Consumer Electronics & Beverages.
_
+
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Contact Step
In B2B 27 % of the volume is in programs with a regular frequency, 40% in ‘First contacts’ and 27% in reminders.
Teasers have an open rate of 33%, First contacts 30% & reminders 26%. Confirmation e-mails & ‘follow-up’ mails are very successful. ‘Last calls’ are clearly less successful.
The regular frequency programs have an average Open rate and a CTR 10 % above average.
+
_
+
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Contact Step
In B2C 80% of the volume concerns programs with a regular frequency.As in B2B teasers, first contacts & reminders have a slowly decreasing rates. ‘Last calls’ are less successful.
The regular frequency programs have an average open rate but a lower CTR (10% in stead of 13,4%).
An in depth analysis learns that in these programs open rates are slowing down in the time, but that specific offering can break this evolution
_+
_
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2007
Personalization
In B2B 56% of the e-mails were not personalized, in B2C only 14%.
Both in B2B and in B2C personalized e-mails were more successful. Open rate is 7 to 8 % higher. De impact on CTR is negligible in B2B but double as high in B2C with personalization.
Remarkable is the fact that the Unsubscribe rate is higher in B2B in the case of personalization.
_
+
Benchmark worksCase in the picture
Personalization
Doubling the Open Rate in a monthly e-news program
The importance of an offer that creates expectations
Company BCCJ ob name Pushmail 200712 - NL V1
moment in week MondayBounce% 1,17
unsubcribe % 0
Open% 70,72
CTR % 17,71
Type action Info news
Type call to action Information request
Target Group B2C
Language NL
Contact Step Regular
Personalization Personalized
Benchmark worksCase in the picture
Personalization
The need for quality control in address gathering process
The importance of the right proposition for the right target group at the right moment
Company Adecco
J ob name Studenten 2007 alg - NL
moment in week Friday
Bounce% 44,89
unsubcribe % 0,0
Open% 59,6
CTR % 29,1
Type action Productlaunch
Type call to action Subscription
Target Group B2C
Language NL
Contact Step First contact
Personalization Personalized
Benchmark worksCase in the picture
Personalization
The need for quality control in address gathering process
The importance of the right proposition for the right target group at the right moment
Company Lifescan
J ob name Bloedsuiker
moment in week Thursday
Bounce% 24,2
unsubcribe % 0
Open% 61,73
CTR % 25,46
Type action I nfo news
Type call to action I nformation request
Target Group B2C
Language NL
Contact Step Regular
Personalization Non personalized
Benchmark worksCase in the picture
Personalization
Lack of Brand Awareness, image? No relevancy for the Target Group? No real proposition?
Company KBC
J ob name Newsletter pour La France
moment in week Friday
Bounce% 0
unsubcribe % 0,0
Open% 18,61
CTR % 2,36
Type action Productlaunch
Type call to action Info News
Target Group Diverse
Language FR
Contact Step Regular
Personalization Non Personalized
Benchmark worksCase in the picture
Personalization
Impact of editorial (with photo) on Open rate
No Impact of the editorial on CTR Importance of relevant content to
enhance CTR
Company Siemens
J ob nameIndustry Newsletter #19 - Mixed - NL with Edito
moment in week Friday
Bounce% 7,06
unsubcribe %
Open% 31,41 (vs 24,52)
CTR % 7,68 (vs 7,58)
Type action Info news
Type call to action Information request
Target Group B2B
Language NL
Contact Step Regular
Personalization Non personalized
Benchmark worksCase in the picture
Personalization
No relevant proposition? No relevant offer? No relevant message?
Company Walibi
J ob name Held van het J aar - November NL
moment in week Dinsdag
Bounce% 0,26
unsubcribe %
Open% 18,49
CTR % 5,97
Type action Wedstrijd
Type call to action Informatie zoeken/vragen
Target Group B2C
Language NL
Contact Step First contact
Personalization Non personalized
Benchmark worksE-mail marketing 2008
January > June
2008 Comp. 2007BtoB BtoC BtoB BtoC
Unsubsribe Rate 0,2 0,1 200 100Bounce Rate 13,3 9,0 127 97Open rate 23,2 30,5 89 87CTR 4,8 12,6 70 94CTO 20,6 41,4 78 108
Benchmark worksThe Use of it within Proximity BBDO
Clients & Agency
0
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
300.000
350.000
400.000
450.000
Month
££
Benchmark worksProximity BBDO Objectives
1. A Yardstick for internal evaluation
2. A Catalyst for KPI & dashboard standardisation
3. A support Tool for campaign learnings
Result Works & Benchmark worksHow it works
1. Distinction of Operational & Tactical Reporting
2. Use of all common campaign tools in the market for Operational Reporting
3. Creation of a Campaign Warehouse by Client to deliver the tactical reporting
4. The common structure of this WH enables powerfull benchmarking
Benchmark WorksAs A consequence
Best Practices
Limit your objectives Do not ask to much info at once Activate the subject line. Be aware of
spam. Rotate in high frequency e-mails. Be compatible with the preview panes Put the single most important message and
the CTA left on top
Benchmark WorksAs A consequence
Best Practices
Limit the number of fonts and colors used
Pay attention to the medium concerning copy. Short and above the fold
Use a clear CTA (max of 2). Repeat Bring relevant & credible contentTest
Benchmark WorksAs A consequence
Checklist
CHECKLIST EFFECTIEF COMMUNICEREN VIA EMAIL
JANEEN
Doelgroep/Doelstelling
Weet ik precies naar welke doelgroep de email wordt gestuurd?
Is er één duidelijke doelstelling bepaald?
Kan ik via email deze doelstelling bij de doelgroep bereiken?
OptinIs de copy van de optin voldoende activerend geschreven?
Is er gebruik gemaakt van een JA/NEE optin?
OptoutIs er een optoutmogelijkheid voorzien?
Wordt de optout gevolgd door een vragenlijst?
Is er een tell a friend optie voorzien?
Is er een privacystatement voorzien?
Subjectline en afzender
Is de subjectline voldoende activerend?
Is de subjectline beperkt tot 45 karakters?
Is de subjectline spam proof?
Wordt in subjectline of afzender het merk duidelijk vernoemd?
Is de subjectline gepersonaliseerd (naam/gedrag)?
Is de afzender van de mail een naam, en geen emailadres?
Technische specificaties
Is de lettergrootte 11 of meer?
Is de maximumbreedte 600 pixels?
Is de mail outlook 2007 compliant?
Is de mail, inclusief call to action, leesbaar zonder beelden?
Is de tekst donker, en de achtergrond licht?
Is er een ‘niet leesbaar, klik hier’ knop voorzien?
CreatieIs alle belangrijke informatie terug te vinden in de linkerbovenhoek?
Heeft de mail niet meer dan 3 verschillende letterypes?
Heeft de mail niet meer dan 3 verschillende kleuren?
Heb je nagedacht over de mogelijkheid van bewegende beelden?
CopyIs de copy kort en interessant gehouden?
Is de mail scanbaar via titels en subtitels?
Is er een duidelijke call to action in het preview vak?
Komt deze call to action terug doorheen de mail in tekstlinks (6)?
Is de mail gepersonaliseerd indien mogelijk?
VersturenHeb je nagedacht over het beste moment van versturen?
Benchmark WorksAs A consequence
19,4% Open rate & 23,2% CTO 20,0% Open rate & 27,5% CTO
Benchmark WorksAs A consequence
Detailed results available for clients
Benchmark WorksAs A consequence
Results integrated within Clients Campaign Dashboards