Project Goals and Schedule

BLENDING THE NEW SCIENCE AND THE LITERACY PRACTICES AS PART OF MIDDLE SCHOOL TEACHING AND

LEARNING

Investigating the Framework for K-12 Science Education and the ELA/Literacy Framework of the Common Core of State Standards

A Partnership between Meriden Public School and Central Connecticut State University

2014 CSDE Education Reform District K-8 Science Improvement Grant

PROJECT GOALS AND SCHEDULEActivity 1: Lecture and Q&A (20 minutes)

Overarching Project Goal

Deepen one’s content knowledge and competency of the science (K-12 Framework) and ELA/Literacy (CCSS).

Project Outcomes• Understand the science (K-12 Framework) and the

ELA/Literacy (CCSS). • Align classroom pedagogy to science (K-12 Framework)

and to the ELA/Literacy (CCSS). • Increase higher-order questioning strategies to promoting

student collaboration and depth of thinking.• Create 1-2 interdisciplinary science units that embed

science K-12 Framework and ELA Literacy CCSS teaching strategies.

• Create a mini-action research project to assess changes of student understanding of the concepts from the science K-12 Framework and the ELA/Literacy CCSS.

Project Team

Lincoln Middle School Washington Middle School

Central Connecticut State University—PD Team• Marsha Bednarski—science education• Sally Drew—teacher education—literacy specialist • Jeff Thomas—secondary science education

Lois Lehman—Director of Curriculum and PD Project Director

Generalized Project Timeline

FEB-JUN 2014

• Developing a Common Language of Science and Literacy Practices• Framework for K-12 Science Education, NGSS, ELA/Literacy CCSS• Instruction and Assessment-Understanding the Best Practices as it relates to the New

Science Framework and ELA/Literacy CCSS

Summer: JUN 23-27

• Unit Development• Climate Change Unit—An example of a unit that integrates science and ELA/Literacy

practices• Individual/Team development of 1-2 units that integrates the science and ELA Literacy

practices

2014-15

Academic Year

• Action Research• Implement teacher-developed unit plan• Assess student understanding of science and ELA/Literacy practices and science

content.

PD ScheduleAcademic Year Schedule 2013-2014 • Friday, February 7: Lincoln MS

• 8am to 12pm (teachers report at individual schools at 1pm)

• Thursday, March 20: Washington MS• 8am to 12pm (teachers report at individual schools at 1pm)

• Friday, April 11: Lincoln MS• 8am to 2:30pm

• Friday, May 2: Washington MS• 8am to 2:30pm

• Friday, June 6: Lincoln MS• 8am to 2:30pm

Summer Schedule—CCSU, Copernicus Hall Room 501Monday, June 23 to Friday, June 27

8am to 1pm

Benefits of this PD ProjectProfessional • Collaboration with peers/colleagues • Improved content and pedagogical knowledge

• Science & Engineering Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, Disciplinary Core Ideas

• ELA/Literacy Practices• Best practices for instruction and assessment

• Higher-order thinking, student-centered approaches

• Development of teacher-generated units

Financial• Summer Session Stipend: June 23-27

• $125 per day for five days ($625)• Food

Questions thus far???

NAMES AND FACES Activity 2: Project Team Introductions (20 minutes)

Names and Faces Activity

1. I was born more than 300 miles from

here.

2. I can speak 3 languages.

3. I have more than 1 tattoo.

4. I eat raw oysters.

5. I can write my name upside down

6. I have a hole in my socks.

7. I have never changed a diaper.

8. I have attended 3 Shakespeare plays.

9. I play a musical instrument.

10. I do not have my own credit card.

11. I can wiggle my ears.

12. I can name the seven dwarfs.

13. I have never gotten a speeding

ticket.

14. I like jazz music.

15. I can name 10 movies I have seen

in the last year.

16. I have scuba dived.

17. I have never flown in an airplane.

18. I eat anchovies on my pizza.

19. I am the baby in my family.

20. I am engaged to be married.

21. I am a parent.

22. I drive a red car.

23. I own three (or more) pets.

24. I read the newspaper every day.

25. I have never been to New York City.

26. I take public transportation to work.

DIRECTIONS: Learn more about your peers and the project team. Collect signatures of those who can honestly state these items are true for them. Do NOT have your peers sign more than one blank.

TEACHER NEEDS ASSESSMENT Activity 3: Group Activity (50 minutes)

Brainstorming-Needs AssessmentIn groups to 2-3 members, obtain a post-it poster paper. Create quadrant similar to the graphic organizer below. Then, respond to the questions that are inside each section. You will share your results.

What do you want to get out of this PD project?

What are you excited about?

What might be some of your fears?

What questions do you have?

STEM-Literacy Pedagogical Practices Survey

Please think about the class you teach most often. Please rate how often students use these STEM-Literacy practices during your class. If students do not use the practice at all, please circle never. A completed item is shown below. This item shows that students highlight text daily.

Example: Students highlight text:

Never Several times(x)/

Year

Monthly Several X/Month

Weekly Several X/Week

Daily Several X/Day

Break—15 minutes

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ELA/LITERACY COMMON CORE OF STATE STANDARDS

Activity 4: Scavenger Hunt (60 minutes)

Common Core State Standards

• K-12 student expectations in English Language Arts, Literacy in History (SST) and Science and Technical Subjects & Math to prepare for “college and career”

• Fewer, clearer, higher order

• Internationally Benchmarked

• “of the States, by the States;” states adopt by choice (46states)

• $700 million Race to the Top funds tied to adoption (22states)

• Corporate money behind the organizations (ACT, College Board, ETS, Pearson Education, Scholastic, etc.)

CCSS Mission

“The Common Core State Standards provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them. The standards are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in college and careers. With American students fully prepared for the future, our communities will be best positioned to compete successfully in the global economy.”www.corestandards.org

What do Educators need to Know

• CT has adopted the Standards

• They are not the curriculum

• SMARTER Balanced tests are on the way

• Specific ELA and Math standards for each grade span with spiral effect; Literacy Standards for SST/History, Science & Technical Subjects at each grade span

Literacy Organization

Standards Documents• K−5 (cross-disciplinary)• 6−12 English Language Arts• 6−12 Literacy in History/Social Studies,

Science & Technical Subjects

All map onto College & Career Readiness StandardsShared responsibility for students’ literacy

development

Literacy Organization

• CCR: College and Career Readiness Standards (AS)

• Reading: Science and Technical Subjects (10 standards)• Grade Band 6-8• Grade Band 9-10• Grade Band 11-12

• Writing: Science and Technical Subjects (10 standards)• Grade Band 6-8• Grade Band 9-10• Grade Band 11-12

SHIFTS in Literacy

•Disciplinary Literacy

•Close Reading of Complex Texts (staircase of complexity)

•Writing about Text, using Evidence from Text

•Academic Vocabulary

Common Core Expectations

Text Complexity•Consideration of

Reader needs and Task

•Quantitative: readability formulas

•Qualitative: purpose, structure, knowledge demands, levels of meaning

www.corestandards.org

Higher Expectations:Readability

What is Close Reading?

• Analyzing text at the whole text, sentence, and word level for particular purpose

• Examples:• Content vocabulary—consistent across

text?• Structure of scientific/technical texts• Language choice within

scientific/technical text• Author’s purpose• Author’s use of data, evidence, reasoning

Necessary, but insufficient

The Standards do not define:

• Pedagogy— “the how”

• The entire curriculum

• Enrichment beyond the core

• Interventions for students not at grade level

• Support for English language learners and students with special needs

• Everything needed to be college and career ready(including digital literacy)

Where to find the common core standards

Website: www.corestandards.org

Where to find the common core standards

Apps:

Where to find the common core standards

Hard Copy:

2014 CSDE Education Reform District K-8 Science Improvement Grant

Scavenger Hunt

1. What is the relationship between the Literacy College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards (CCR) and the grade band literacy standards?

2. Find a literacy standard that doesn’t make sense to you after the first reading.

3. Find a literacy standard that in a CMT world would be a huge stretch for your students.

4. Find a literacy standard that you could easily integrate into your existing curriculum.

5. What Literacy Standard(s) would students be using if they created a powerpoint? Wrote a lab report?

Challenge:

Where do you see the shifts we discussed reflected in the Standards?

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE FRAMEWORK FOR K12 SCIENCE EDUCATION AND THE NGSS

Activity 5: Lecture with Q&A (60 minutes)

32

Next Generation Science Framework, Standards and

Assessment:Fall 2013 Update

Liz Buttner, Science Education ConsultantCT State Department of Education

[email protected]/4/2013

NRC Framework and the NGSS

Framework describes a reformed “vision” of what it means to be proficient in science:• “knowing science” means applying the Practices to

demonstrate understanding of Core Ideas and Crosscutting Concepts;

• Details the Practices, Core Disciplinary Ideas, and Crosscutting Concepts

NGSS adds assessable Performance Expectations:• Adds performances students should be able to

achieve at the conclusion of instruction (end of year; end of grade band; or on a large-scale assessment).

• Assigns Performance Expectations to each grade (K-5) and to 6-8 and 9-12 grade bands.

11/4/2013 33

Will NGSS adoption improve science teaching and learning in Connecticut?

11/4/2013 34

Can teaching new standards using current approaches yield improved results?

NGSS Adoption Reflections

NGSS present an opportunity to improve curriculum, instruction, teacher development, assessment,

accountability, and ultimately student interest and achievement in science.

NGSS ADOPTION MEANS…Much more than teaching new topics

11/4/2013 35

A Reformed Vision of Science Proficiency

Are educators and parents ready to embrace a new vision of what it means to be “proficient” in science?• “ Focus on understanding and application as opposed to

memorization of facts devoid of context.” (NGSS Appendix A)

• “The integration of content and application reflects how science is practiced and experienced in the real world.” (NGSS Appendix A)

• “Most state standards and assessments express these dimensions as separate entities, leading to their separation in both instruction and assessment.” (NGSS Appendix A)

11/4/2013 36

New Ways of Assessing for Accountability

Are educators ready to prepare students to succeed on state assessment questions like this?“Analyze and interpret data to determine scale properties of objects in the solar system.” (MS-ESS1-3)

11/4/2013 37

Inclusion of Engineering Design in K-12 Science Curriculum

• ETS1.A: Defining and Delimiting Engineering Problems– A situation that people want to change or create can be approached

as a problem to be solved through engineering (K-2)

• ETS1.B: Developing Possible Solutions– Tests are often designed to identify failure points or difficulties, which

suggest the elements of the design that need to be improved (Gr. 3-5)

• ETS1.C: Optimizing the Design Solution– The iterative process of testing the most promising solutions and

modifying what is proposed on the basis of the test results leads to greater refinement and ultimately to an optimal solution (Gr. 6-8)

Design, build, and refine a device that works within given constraints to convert one form of energy into another form of energy* (HS-PS3-3)11/4/2013 38

Coordinating Science with CCSS-ELA and Math

An opportunity for science to be an integral part of students’ comprehensive education by supporting student learning of ELA/literacy and math expectations within the context of science instruction.

11/4/2013 39

TURN AND TALK:• What are the

benefits?• What are the

potential pitfalls

How do NGSS Assessment Expectations Compare to CT Assessment Expectations?

CT Science FrameworkGr. 5 Earth/Space

CMT Expected Performances• B22. Explain the cause of

day and night based on the rotation of Earth on its axis.

• B23. Describe the monthly changes in the appearance of the moon, based on the moon’s orbit around the earth.

NGSS – Gr. 5 Earth/Space

5-ESS1-2: Represent data in graphical displays to reveal patterns of daily changes in length and direction of shadows, day and night, and the seasonal appearance of some stars in the night sky.

11/4/2013 40

Comparing CT to NGSS Assessables: Elementary

11/4/2013 41

CONNECTICUT

EXPECTED PERFORMANCE B.8

Describe the effects of the strengths of pushes and pulls

on the motion of objects.

.

NGSS

EXPECTATION 3-PS2-1

Plan and conduct an investigation to provide

evidence of the effects of balanced and unbalanced forces on the motion of an

object.

Comparing CT to NGSS Assessables: Middle School

11/4/2013 42

CONNECTICUT

EXPECTED PERFORMANCE C15.

Describe the basic structures of an animal cell, including the

nucleus, cytoplasm, mitochondria and cell

membrane, and how they function to support life.

NGSS PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION

MS-LS1-2

Develop and use a model to describe the function of a cell as a whole and ways

parts of cells contribute to the function.

Comparing CT to NGSS Assessables: High School

11/4/2013 43

CONNECTICUT EXPECTED PERFORMANCE D28

Describe the general role of DNA and RNA in protein

synthesis.

NGSS PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION HS-LS1-1

Construct an explanation based on evidence for how the

structure of DNA determines the structure of proteins which carry out the essential functions of life

through systems of specialized cells.

Key Implications of NGSS AdoptionWill require:• Preparing students for new, more rigorous, assessments (not just

remembering facts). NGSS Performance Expectations ARE assessment outcomes.

• 3 years of high school science for all students;• All students to learn biology, physics, chemistry and Earth/Space science in a

progression laid out for K-2, 3-5, 6-8 and 9-12 grade bands;• Inclusion of Engineering Design concepts, practices and outcomes at all

grade bands;• Standards to be translated into coherent curriculum learning units;• Curriculum performance expectations be developed;• Modifications to existing teaching approaches and materials;• Substantial professional learning opportunities (see MSP 2013-2015 project

categories);May require more teachers certified to teach high school Earth Science and Physics.

11/4/2013 44

PHASE 1: REFLECTION (2011-2013)– NGSS Draft feedback to Achieve– Collaborate with other states (BCSSE)– Progress reports to State Board of Education– Content Crosswalk– District Survey– Policy implications– Adoption DecisionPHASE 2: PREPARATION (2012-2013)– Policy decisions (MS/HS courses; cumulative or end-of year tests, certification)– Stakeholder awarenessPHASE 3: TRANSITION (2014-2018)– Professional development system ; new teaching approaches (MSP)– Teacher preparation program upgrades– Curriculum transition timeline– Curriculum and materials modifications– Teaching and learningPHASE 4: FULL IMPLEMENTATION (2017-18 school year)– New assessments introduced

11/4/2013 45

Moving Toward Next Generation Science in CT

STANDARDS:• 2013-14 school yr: 2004 Science Framework, GLCs, GLEs in

effect• Early 2014: CT adoption decision anticipated

POSSIBLE CURRICULUM TRANSITION:• 2014-17: Districts develop and transition to new science

curriculum and instructional approaches• 2014 and beyond: Professional development

POSSIBLE ASSESSMENT TRANSITION:• March 2014-16: CMT and CAPT Science assessments administered

(tentative)• Spring 2017: New or hybrid science assessments? Uncertain

whether end-of-grade, end-of-course or cumulative11/4/2013 46

Possible Connecticut Transition Timeline

Connecti cut ’s NGSS Decision-Making Process

11/4/2013 47

Taking Time to Make Informed Decisions

Standards: Only the Beginning…

NRC Framework:Vision and Broad Goals

NGSS Standards:Assessment

Expectations by Grade and Grade

Band

Assessments:How will

attainment of goals be

measured?

* Curriculum* Teaching Materials* PD System* Teacher Prep courses* Assessments

11/4/2013 48

To be

developedTo be

developedCompleted

2013Completed

2011

Sti ll Many “Unknowns”

• How will large scale assessments measure Practices integrated with Core Ideas? For example: “Develop and use a model to describe how the total number of atoms does not change in a chemical reaction and thus mass is conserved.” (MS-PS1-5)

• Who will pay for innovative, new tests?• How long will it take to develop such tests?• Will new science tests be cumulative or administered at every

grade?• How many states will adopt NGSS? How will publishers address

NGSS?AND…

11/4/2013 49

Context Considerati ons

• Districts are currently tackling much change: - Common Core implementation

- Teacher evaluation SLOs and IAGDs- Personalized learning- Competency-based report cards

• NGSS assessment consortia have not been formed or funded. New ways of testing “practices” not determined yet.

• Publishers have not yet developed new instructional materials to illustrate the NGSS vision.

11/4/2013 50

Sample Adopti on Opti ons

Embrace the vision defined in the “Framework for K-12 Science Education” (National Research Council, 2012) and…• Adopt all NGSS Assessment Expectations (Performance

Expectations) only;• Adopt some NGSS Assessment Expectations;• Adopt NGSS Assessment Expectations and develop Curriculum

Expectations similar to CT K-8 Grade-Level Concepts (GLCs) and Grade-Level Expectations (GLEs);

• Revise current CT Framework and Standards to reflect NRC Framework Core Ideas, Practices and Crosscutting Concepts;

• Collaborate with other states to develop curriculum standards.• Other possibilities…

11/4/2013 51

52

Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS):Connecticut’s Adoption Implications Study

ACTIVITY PURPOSE COMPLETIONDATE

Content CrosswalkIdentify which NGSS concepts are in CT standards at the same grade; at a different grade; or not in CT standards at all. Findings available October 2013.

April 2013

District Implications SurveyElicit district input related to capacity and challenges associated with adoption and transition to NGSS. September 2013

Instructional Shifts ReportCompare vision for science teaching and learning in NRC Framework to current CT standards; highlight key shifts. Fall 2013

Middle/High School Course-Mapping Study Groups

Elicit district input related to challenges and opportunities for organizing NGSS standards into course sequences for all students. January 2014

Higher Education Focus Groups

Elicit input on NRC Framework/NGSS adoption from higher education science/engineering & teacher prep faculty. What are potential impacts on students’ success in college STEM courses or majors, and on teaching approaches used in undergraduate science courses.

January 2014

Adoption Options Focus GroupConvene state NGSS Content Review Committee to compare final NGSS publication to January 2013 feedback to Achieve. What concerns persist? What adoption options address the concerns.

February 2014

Recommendations to State Board of Education

Present adoption recommendations, including systemic improvements and a phased-in transition timeline if adoption is recommended. Early 2014

11/4/2013

CSDE Adoption Implications Study: What Are We Learning So Far?

11/4/2013 53

54

NGSS-CT Content Crosswalk• CSDE committee compared curriculum concepts in NGSS to those in

current state standards. DID NOT COMPARE PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS. Crosswalk answers the following questions:– Which NGSS concepts have a match in Connecticut standards at the same

grade (or grade band);

– Which NGSS concepts have a match in Connecticut standards at a different grade (or grade band);

– Which NGSS concepts have no match in Connecticut standards and would be new for teachers and students;

– Which Connecticut standards have no match in NGSS and could potentially be removed from science curriculum and assessment if NGSS were adopted?

– Which grades or grade bands would have the greatest proportion of curricular change if NGSS were adopted?

11/4/2013

55

NGSS-CT Content Crosswalk Highlights

Complete report to be posted soon. Highlights include:– About two-thirds of the concepts in the NGSS have a match in

Connecticut’s current state standards; – Most new content would be in Gr. 9-12: engineering design; wave

properties; electromagnetic radiation; evidence of common ancestry and diversity; the universe and its stars and history of planet Earth

– More physical science in Gr. K-5.– Current state science standards apply only to Grades 9 and 10, in

keeping with the state requirement for two years of high school science and the state CAPT Science assessment administered at Grade 10.

– NGSS are intended to apply to Grades 9 through 12, and would require at least three years of high school science coursework.

– Implications?

11/4/2013

56

Content Crosswalk HeadlinesGreatest change would be felt in Grades 9-12*:– only 51% of NGSS concepts are required of all students in

current state standards. – 61% of NGSS Physical Science Gr. 9-12 concepts would be new

requirements for all Connecticut high school students; – 58% of the NGSS Earth/Space Science Gr. 9-12 concepts would

be newly required of all Connecticut high school students. * Disparity partly because current state science standards apply only to Grades 9 and 10, in keeping with the state requirement for 2 years of high school science and the state CAPT Science assessment administered at Grade 10. NGSS, by contrast, are intended to apply to Grades 9 through 12, and would require at least 3 years of high school science coursework.

11/4/2013

57

Content Crosswalk Headlines

Concepts in current Connecticut standards that do not have a match in NGSS include: – Bacteria, viruses, infectious disease; optical

technologies; food preservation technologies; biotechnology; nutrition; and the physics of bridges

– Could be addressed in curriculum designed to teach ETS2: Links Among Engineering, Technology, Science and Society

11/4/2013

2013-2014 School Year:What Can Districts Focus On Now?

11/4/2013 58

61

District Implications Survey• Circulated from mid-August through late September 2013.

• Solicits collective and individual feedback about district “capacity” for science program reform: curriculum, science leadership, teaching materials, professional development.

• Over 550 responses from assistant superintendents, district science coordinators, teachers, coaches and other district-level personnel.

• Will inform a set of adoption recommendation to be brought to State Board of Education.

• Will be used to Identify and plan for resources, supports and costs associated with NGSS adoption, transition and implementation.

11/4/2013

62

STAYING INFORMED

• NGSS newsletters– Are you on the CSDE science mailing list?– Contact Liz Buttner at [email protected] to

subscribe• RESC Science Council presentations• CSTA and CSSA events• SDE science web page: www.sde.ct.gov

11/4/2013

WRAP-UPActivity 6: Assessment Activity (15 minutes)

Reviewing the Needs Assessment

• Revise your needs assessment poster. Add ideas and revise others.

• Then, we will do a quick debriefing.

Next Time

• Our next meeting will be Thursday, March 20th We will meet for a half day from 8am to 12pm at Washington Middle School. We will mostly focus on the ELA CCSS for Science.

• If you have any questions, please contact Lois Lehman or any of the CCSU staff:– Marsha Bednarski: [email protected]– Sally Drew: [email protected] – Jeff Thomas: [email protected]