Director Social Dimensions of Health Institute (SDHI) Universities of St Andrews & Dundee Co-founder Research Unit for Research Utilisation (RURU) Universities of Edinburgh & St Andrews What do we know about research use? Professor Huw Davies
DirectorSocial Dimensions of Health Institute (SDHI)
Universities of St Andrews & DundeeCo-founder
Research Unit for Research Utilisation (RURU)Universities of Edinburgh & St Andrews
What do we know about research use?
Professor Huw Davies
Yes, it’s quite a noise – but are we having any impact?
The challenge for all of us in the knowledge business…
“Social science should be at the heart of policy making… we need social scientists to help determine what works and why, and what types of policy initiatives are likely to be most effective.”
David Blunkett, Secretary of State for Education
“What matters is What Works”
AND: “No one with the slightest common-sense could take seriously suggestions by University researchers that homework is bad for you.”
the very same, David Blunkett, Secretary of State for Education
But policy & evidence sometimes collide…
“There is nothing a politician likes so little as to be well-informed.
It makes decision making so complex and so difficult…”
John Maynard Keynes
(and maybe “using evidence” isn’t so straightforward after all…)
Health care, social care, education and criminal justice
Research Unit for Research Utilisation
- RURU –Sandra Nutley, Isabel Walter, Huw DaviesUniversities of Edinburgh & St Andrews
Peter Smith, University of York
www.ruru.ac.uk
A resource on literatures related to research use
What do we mean by research and
evidence?
Understanding the complexitiesof using research for knowledge.
Implications for facilitating more
research use?
CEO
Modelling knowledge production and useTraditional linear model – assumes rather
uncomplicated relationships between research/knowledge and knowledge/action
Knowledge Creation
Knowledge validation
Knowledge Dissemination
Knowledge adoption
Researchers Users
KT
Too - simple, rational, linear, uni-directional, individualised, unproblematised, asocial, and acontextual (otherwise, OK…)
Research - Evidence - Knowledge
* very uncertain process, combining –- other systematic sources of knowledge, - experience and/or expert advice,- existing (tacit) knowledge, and - values…
* knowledge is socially and contextually situated…
* often end up with contested or even conflictingknowledge, with power entering the mix…
Gaining knowledge from social research
The complexities of policy actionSOMETIMES:• clearly defined event• explicit decisions • conscious deliberation • defined policies • policy fixed at
implementation
OFTENTIMES:• ongoing process• piecemeal: no single decision• muddling through• policies emerge and accrete• shaped through
implementation
Role of research evidence contingent:Engineered vs Shapingsolutions debates
Key message for Social Research:
Recognising instead:• The importance of context;• Interaction with other types of
knowledge (tacit; experiential);• Multi-voiced iterative dialogue;• ‘Use’ as a process not an event.
…moving us away from ideas of “packaging” knowledge and doing “knowledge transfer”.
Interactive, social and interpretive models of “research use” better reflect what actually happens…
Improving research use: addressing supply, demand, and that in between
Improving stocks or reservoirs of research-informed knowledge
- academic and other -
Increasing demand in policy, service and professional worlds, and wider society
intermediationIncreasingResearch translation, knowledge management and knowledge pools, research brokering and boundary spanning, co-location, secondments and role cycling, partnerships of all kinds,
sustained interactivity…
Challenges of sustained interactivity:• Maintaining dialogue across divergent cultures…
…lack of incentives,uncertain rewards