Top Banner
LPC Loads & Results LPC Loads & Results Production Improvements of ALD Vacuum Carburizing vs Conventional Atmosphere Carburizing (with various Load Examples and Results)
18

Production Improvements of ALD Vacuum Carburizing vs Conventional Atmosphere Carburizing

Jul 15, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Production Improvements of ALD Vacuum Carburizing

vs Conventional Atmosphere Carburizing

(with various Load Examples and Results)

Page 2: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Sprocket Sample

Material: Powdered Metal0.4%C, 0.5%Cr, 0.5%Mn, 0.5%Mo (AISI 4142 Equivalent)

Number of parts: 288Total Weight: 440kg (970 lbs)Quench media: HeliumQuench pressure: 20 BarCase Depth: 0.35 mm (min)Surface Carbon: 1.0%(wt)Surface Hardness: 700 HV1 (min)

Page 3: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Sprocket Sample

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2

distance from surface [ mm ]

carb

on

co

nte

nt

[ w

eig

ht

- %

]

sprocket 3609

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0

distance from surface [ mm ]

hard

nes

s [

HV

0.1

]

1: journal

2: tooth

pretrialsprocket 11

2Carbon Profile

Hardness Profile

Page 4: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Bevel Gear Sample

Material: 16MnCr5Number of Parts: 198Weight per part: 1.39 kgTotal Weight: 410 kg (900 lbs)Quench Media: HeliumQuench Pressure: 20 BarCase Depth: 0.40mm (min)Core Hardness: 311 HV1Surface Hardness: 700 HV1 (min)

Page 5: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Bevel Gear Sample

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4distance from surface [ mm ]

carb

on

co

nte

nt

[ w

eig

ht

- %

]

1: cd = 0,4 - 0,6 mm

2: cd = 0,6 - 0,8 mm

C2H2

T = 930 °C16MnCr51

2

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1,20 1,40

distance from surface [ mm ]

har

dn

ess

[ H

V 1

]

1: root

2: flank

3: tip

1

23

T = 930 °Ct = 98 min20 bar He16MnCr5

Carbon Profile

Hardness Profile

Page 6: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Hardness ProfileDiesel Nozzle Sample

Material: 16MnCr5Number of Parts: 4000

Total Weight 480kg (1060 lbs)Quench Medium: NitrogenQuench Pressure: 20 BarCase Depth: .060mm (min)Core Hardness: 450 HV1Surface Hardness: 770 HV1 (min)

Injector Detailed Presentation

Page 7: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Hardness profiles of a nozzle

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1

distance from the surface [ mm ]

hard

ness

[ H

V 1

]

1: seat inside

2: shaft inside

3: shaft outside

1

2

3

Hardness Profile - Diesel Nozzle Sample

Page 8: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Blind Hole PerformanceBlind Hole Performance

Page 9: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Material: 25MoCr4Largest Size: 16“Dia x6“ HWeight: ~90 lb/ea. (maximum)Heat Treating Process: LPC with 20-Bar Helium Quench

Mixed Load Sample

Page 10: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5depth in mm

Har

dnes

s in

HV

10

sample #1(top) flank

sample #1 root

sample #2 (bottom) flank

sample #2 root

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2

depth in mm

carb

on c

onte

nt in

%

C-Profile

Case Hardness: 60-63 HRC

Core Hardness: 34-38 HRC

Case Depth: 1.40 mm (flank)

Mixed Load Sample

Hardness Profile

Page 11: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & ResultsLPC Loads & Results

Hardness Comparison ofOil-quenched vs. Helium-quenched Samples

Mixed Load Sample

Hardness in HRC Oil QuenchBefore tempering

Oil QuenchAfter Tempering

Helium QuenchedAfter Tempering

Core hardness 33.2 - 34.0 29.5 - 33.2 34.0 – 35.0

Hardness at root 35.4 – 37.1 34.5 – 37.7 35.0 – 38.3

Page 12: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & Results

• Effective Case Depth: 0.045/0.065"• 25 to 35 per load (4/tray conventional)

• 7.6 hrs LPC vs. 9.75 hrs conventional

• To get acceptable distortion Modified loading pattern

Modified quench parameters Changed part temperature before quench

010203040506070

0 50 100 150 200 250Depth (0.001")

HR

C

Pitch (LPC) Root (LPC)Pitch (conventional) root (conventional)

Hub Gears

Page 13: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & Results

• Effective Case: 0.045/0.065"• 55 to 84 per load (20/tray conventional)• 5.25 hrs LPC vs. 9.75 hrs conventional carburizing

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 50 100 150 200

Depth (0.001")

HR

C

Pitch Root

Helical Side Gears

Page 14: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & Results

• Effective Case Depth: 0.045/0.065"• 128 pieces per load (25/tray conventional

carburizing)• 5.25 hrs LPC vs. 9.75 hrs conventional carburizing

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 50 100 150

Depth (0.001")

HR

C

Pitch Root

Drive Pinions

Page 15: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & Results

• Effective Case Depth: 0.045/0.065"• 365 / load (80/tray conventional)• 5.0 hrs LPC vs. 9.75 hrs conventional carburizing• To get acceptable spider arm distortion

loading pattern had to be modified

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 50 100 150Depth (0.001")

HR

C

Pitch Root

Differential Spiders

Page 16: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & Results

Product

#of parts / fixture Carburizing time (hours)

ALD Vacuum Carburizing

Conventional atmosphere Carburizing

ALD Vacuum Carburizing

Conventional Atmosphere Carburizing

Hub Gears 25 to 35 4 7.6 9.75

Diff Spiders 365 80 5.0 9.75

Drive Pinion

128 25 5.25 9.75

Helical Gears

55 to 84 20 5.25 9.75

Production Improvement

Page 17: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & Results

Parts: Chain for Conveyors

Material: 21Mn5 (carburizing)

15CrNi6 (case hardening)

Spec.: ECD (550 HV) / CD (0,35%C) =

1,0 to 3,0 mm

Surface-C: 0,75-0,80 %C (21Mn5)

Surface Hardness: min. 800 HV (15CrNi6)

Process: HT-Vacuum Carburizing: 1050°C

Gas quenching: 20 bar He

Load: 600x750x1000 (WxHxL in mm)

600 - 1000 kg gross

System: ModulTherm 3 + 2(2008)

Capacity: 7.000 kg per day in average

SOP: October 2007

High-Temp LPC of Chains

Page 18: Production Improvements of  ALD Vacuum Carburizing  vs Conventional  Atmosphere Carburizing

LPC Loads & Results

0

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3

EHT (550HV) in mm

Be

ha

nd

lun

gs

da

ue

r in

h

950°C - Direkthärtung

1050°C - Einfachhärtung

1050°C - Direkthärtung

Tot

al t

rea

tmen

t tim

e in

hr

Effective case depth (550HV) in mm

1740F direct hardening

1920F single hardening

1920F direct hardening

High-Temp LPC of Chains