PRINCIPAL ORIENTATION June 18, 2007
Feb 23, 2016
PRINCIPAL ORIENTATION
June 18, 2007
Accelerating Student Achievement Pilot
WHY?
Sector 1
Sector 2
Sector 3Sector 4
Building a plane while you’re flying it.
In a sense, this is what we do.
We build your digital business even while you’re
up and running.
EDS(Voice over: Managing the complexities
of a digital economy)
http://content.jengajam.com/eds_plane.mpg
AGENDA
June 18, 2007 8:30 Welcome and Overview Glenn Pelecky
Kristine Wolzen
9:00 Expectations Maggie Van Fossen
Edward Gronlund
Dave Quinn
10:45 ASAP Schools Dave Quinn
12:00 Lunch
12:30 Relationships Nancy McIntire
Georgie Koenig
1:30 Logistics Dave Quinn
2:00 Action Planning Nancy McIntire
Maggie Van Fossen
3:15 Evaluation Dave Quinn
3:30 Adjourn Dave Quinn
The Effective School
What does an effective school look like and sound like?
Instructional Decision Making (IDM)
Basic Premise
All students are part of the general education system
IDM in a nutshell… The Instructional Decision
Making (IDM) process focuses on instruction by using data regarding students’ responses to instruction to guide future educational decisions.
Three-Tiered Intervention Model
TIER I is comprised of three elements:
Core reading program
Benchmark testing of students to determine instructional needs at least three times a year
Ongoing professional development
TIER I: Core
Tier II is small-group supplemental instruction in addition to the time allotted for core reading instruction.
Tier II includes programs, strategies, and procedures designed and employed to supplement, enhance, and support Tier I.
TIER II: Supplemental
TIER III: IntensiveTIER III is intensive, strategic, supplemental instruction specifically designed and customized small-group or 1:1 reading instruction that is extended beyond the time allocated for Tier I and Tier II.
Behavior
PBIS structureAcademic Systems Behavioral Systems
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•High Intensity
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•Intense, durable procedures
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
Universal Interventions•All students•Preventive, proactive
Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive
Instructional Decision Making
ALL
SOME
FEW
BELL CURVE
Struggling students
Accelerated students
Grade level expectation
Side view of IDM
IDM Main Concepts
Curriculum
Instruction
Assessment
Systems
CoreCurriculum & Instruction
The district adopted comprehensive curriculum
Provided for all students
Screening and formative evaluations occur
Core cycle
Instruction that is available for students identified as exceeding or not meeting core- learning expectations
Provided to smaller groups of students with similar needs
Research based/evidence based strategies selected
Targeted instruction in identified area
SupplementalInstruction
Supplemental Cycle
Instruction that is available for students identified as significantly exceeding or not meeting core and/or supplemental learning expectations
Provided to individuals or small groups of students with similar need
Research based/evidence based strategies selected
Intensive cycle
Intensive
Questions answered through Screening
How is each student responding to instruction?
Is the instruction effective?
Which students may need additional assessments?
What is the data telling you?
4th Grade MathMultiplication 0-9
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Brea
ux A
isha
SC
hapd
elai
n Li
ly M
Rob
b Syd
ney
MM
angi
one
Nik
ole
MW
hite
Bai
ley
VR
amey
Sar
a B
Litts
en L
ucas
RFo
xhov
en S
hane
AG
onza
les
Audr
yana
Fo
ley
Thom
as J
Her
mes
Jay
MThu
eson
Lila
DSv
ob S
eth
HSal
sbur
y M
aria
h A
Wills
Don
na D
Blak
eley
Bra
ndee
EKel
logg
Ant
hony
SN
egre
te S
ara
MAsh
ton
Julia
ED
aile
y Br
ando
n L
Show
ers
Philli
p J
Cou
nes
Jam
es G
Hilk
emey
er A
ustin
RH
owe
Ash
ley
BSt
rider
Kat
ie N
Sant
a cr
uz D
anie
l RG
alle
go A
ngel
a M
Lew
ando
wsk
iSis
k C
ody
AFo
rsyt
h Ia
n E
Bla
ke N
icho
las
KH
atch
Van
essa
LM
acha
in A
ntho
ny F
Pete
rson
Tyl
er L
Whi
te A
lexa
LN
utbr
own
Jord
an C
Blu
emke
Meg
an J
Cas
amas
a G
rego
ry L
Roc
he A
lyss
a R
Elia
s El
izab
eth
LBe
esto
n Kris
tine
DLo
pez
Ther
esa
APi
erce
Sha
nnon
MLa
nier
Mat
thew
WN
anna
Cai
tlin N
Smith
She
lby
NItu
rral
de J
acqu
elin
e R
Mch
arg
Jord
an E
Brec
hbie
l Sha
ri L
Cot
a Ale
xia
KJa
ckso
n D
amio
n M
Lam
adrid
Leo
nard
o O
liver
Rile
y W
Layt
on M
aris
sa M
Mue
ller La
ne E
Turn
er A
lana
KR
owla
n Pai
ge E
Dum
es S
cott
MR
iord
an T
imot
hy D
Hic
ks C
oltin
CKe
nton
Che
lsee
MC
ornw
ell K
imbe
rly M
Cra
ter Sh
elbi
e M
Ryt
ting
Rya
n C
Fre
nch
Josh
ua M
Dav
ila A
riel N
Thom
pson
Tas
ha N
Ryc
kman
She
lby
LAye
rs M
egan
LD
unha
m C
layt
on J
Mau
sert
Jam
es R
Mor
ales
Eric
ABa
in B
ryce
GG
rycz
kow
ski s
amlu
kC
uff M
atth
ew J
Hac
kman
Lin
dsey
SW
hitlo
ck J
ohn
CBen
son
Bra
d J
Sta
nfie
ld B
enja
min
CM
artin
ez N
atha
niel
PC
arriz
osa
Rob
ert A
Web
b Bria
nna
JEva
ns J
osep
h B
Laye
Les
tot D
Bazz
anel
la S
teph
en L
Cro
wl R
ober
t STh
omps
on K
ryst
a E
Tip
ton
Em
ily N
Mey
er S
ean
MC
outu
re A
nne
SG
ibbo
ns C
ody
DFuh
rman
Aut
um C
Nol
en J
ayd
LD
rake
Jus
tin T
Nea
le S
hain
e R
Pur
cell J
ohn
ER
ugot
ska
Col
ton
JBo
ng S
aman
tha
LJo
hnso
n Am
anda
LR
odrig
uez
Rya
n T
Ber
gstrom
Mat
thew
APa
nnel
l Mar
ina
S
Dig
its C
orre
ct T
wo
Min
utes
Fourth Grade Math
What is the data telling you?
Fourth Grade Multiplication 0-9
020406080
100120140
Roc
he
Cha
pdelain
Lamb Nicole
Gav
ino
Tipton
Emily
Neg
rete
Layton
Foxh
oven
Man
gion
e
Gon
zales
Grycz
kowsk
i Rob
b
Hilk
emey
er
Nan
na
Cuff M
atthew
Williams
Bluem
ke
Wills Don
na
Cornw
ell
Oliv
er R
iley
San
ta cruz
Mey
er S
ean Hatch
Brech
biel
White A
lexa
Mau
sert
Ban
ken
Ken
ton
Mon
tano
Sm
ith
Aye
rs
Turner A
lana
Ryc
kman
Fran
klin
Fros
t Jos
hua Nea
le
Dig
its C
orre
ct T
wo
Min
utes
Fourth Grade Math
Questions answered through Diagnostic Assessment
What are the specific concerns?
What instruction does the student need?
Questions answered through Formative Assessment
Is the student making progress compared to self, peers and/or standard?
What instructional adjustments are needed?
IDM is a process to organize and align resources to improve achievement of all learners using…
• Assessing needs• Planning• Implementing• Evaluating
Improving StudentAchievement by Making
Connections
Activity
Use the IDM handout section about “Guiding Principles.”
Use your list of categories of effective schools.
Talk (as a table group) about ways the characteristics of an Effective School are reflected in IDM’s Guiding Principles.
Prepare to whole-group share.
Journaling
Journaling is a quick, but effective way to reflect on something wehave just thought about, seen for the first time or freshly learned.
Periodically, we will take a few moments to journal individually, then share as you wish with a partner.
Mississippi Bend Area Education AgencyAgency-Wide Goals
Increase the percentage of low socioeconomic, minority, and individualized plan students achieving reading proficiency in grades 4, 8, and 11.
Increase the percentage of low socioeconomic, minority, and individualized plan students achieving mathematics proficiency in grades 4, 8, and 11.
Increase the percentage of low socioeconomic, minority, and individualized plan students achieving science proficiency in grades 5, 8, and 11.
MBAEA Reading Goal
0
20
40
60
80
100
Baseline 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
Reporting Years
Prof
icienc
y Ra
tes
Low SES Minority IEP
MBAEA Math Goal
0
20
40
60
80
100
Baseline 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
Reporting Years
Prof
icienc
y Ra
tes
Low SES Minority IEP
MBAEA Science Goal
0
20
40
60
80
100
Baseline 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
Reporting Years
Prof
icienc
y Ra
te
Low SES Minority IEP
Accelerating Student Achievement Pilot“ASAP”
OUTCOMES
1. Improve Student Achievement
2. Implement an Instructional Decision-Making Process
3. Have an AEA Building Level Service Plan
Pilot Year One:
Improve Student Achievement
a) Select 30 students• At-risk students struggling to be successful
academically (may have an IEP and some will)• Students benefiting from changes in general
education classroom instruction• Students with an academic history within the
building (hopefully three years)b) Collect baseline datac) Identify interventionsd) Embed interventions in the general
education classroom and provide supplemental and/or intensive support
e) Ongoing formative assessment
The 30 student concept is intended to put-a-face to the overall school improvement intervention plan
Pilot Year One:
Implement an Instructional Decision-Making Process
a) Conduct an Instruction Decision-Making gap analysis • September 2007• Involve the building leadership team
b) Devise an implementation action plan• Engage faculty in a conversation to begin the process
of understanding IDM• Initiate beginning steps towards implementation
c) Develop an Instructional Decision-Making flow chart that begins with effective instruction in the general education classroom
A key assumption underlying the ASAP project is that core instruction in the general education classroom needs to improve to reduce the number of academically at-risk students; thus, we believe higher levels of student learning require changes in instructional methods and processes.
Pilot Year One:
Have an AEA Building Level Service Plan
a) Identify current AEA services b) Building level teaching and learning needs
assessmentc) Conduct an AEA service gap analysisd) Prioritize needse) Align AEA services to building needs for 2008-09f) Describe the AEA servicesg) State the 2008-09 outcomes h) State a feedback loop
It is anticipated that 2008-09 school year should produce positive outcomes for the 30 students and all students within the pilot buildings.
Pilot Year One:
ASAP 2007-2008 Outcome Timeline
I. By September, select the 30 at-risk students in partnership with the building principal
II. By the end of September, complete the building level Instructional Decision-Making gap analysis
III. By October 19, complete the following (30 students):• Interventions for the selected 30 students• Teacher training related to the interventions• Ongoing formative assessment collection & analysis
timeline• Involvement of teachers in the data feedback
IV. By April 2008, complete the following:• AEA Service Plan for 2008-2009• Embed the IDM action plan inside the AEA
Service Plan
Journaling
Journaling is a quick, but effective way to reflect on something wehave just thought about, seen for the first time or freshly learned.
Periodically, we will take a few moments to journal individually, then share as you wish with a partner.
Let’s Look at the Job Descriptions and Support
What will this partnership look like in your school?
Job descriptions for Service Facilitator and SectorCoordinator
Role of Principal
Supports that are available
AEA resourcesAEA directorsSchool and district resources
The Current State of our Schools
Principal and Service Facilitator describe:
A. Current state of the school?B. Why the principal applied?
Vision for the PilotA. Given expectations and school context, what is
the vision of the pilot?B. What will be necessary for this to happen?
Journaling
Relationships
Predictive Index - Sharing and Application of Knowledge
Profile (PRO) for Service Facilitator and Sector Coordinator Positions
Predictive Index (PI) for Each of Us
PI Related to Job ResponsibilitiesWhere are you the most confident?
Where might you want support?What kind of support works best for you?
Using PI Information to Work Well as a Team
Journaling
Logistics
Outlook Calendar – Please keep your calendar in Outlook for ease of scheduling meetings
Progress Review
Coordinators and Service Facilitators – Please meet at least monthly to review progress toward accomplishing the three outcomes for ASAP.
Coordinators, Service Facilitators and Service Providers – Please meet monthly at the school site to review relationships and progress toward accomplishing the three outcomes for ASAP. Include the building principal at least initially.
Coordinators and Director – Please meet at least monthly to also review how things are going toward accomplishing the three outcomes for ASAP
More Logistics
Service Facilitators as a Collaborative Team
Facilitated by a Professional Development Coach
September and October – Meet twice each month, then according to established schedule. May meet at school site or in AEA offices.
Focus on Blended Coaching and other knowledge/skills identified by the collaborative team
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8
Impossibilities are merely things which
we have not yet been learned.
-- Charles W. Chesnutt
Key Dates for Action Planning
July 30-August 15, service facilitator and sector coordinator engage in a complete overview of the evaluation process and project outcomes; plus,How to select the 30 at-risk studentsHow to identify interventionsHow to set-up formative assessmentHow to collect baseline building data
By September, select the 30 at-risk students in partnership with the building principal
By the end of September, complete the building level Instructional Decision-Making gap analysis
By October 19, complete the following (30 students):Interventions for the selected 30 studentsTeacher training related to the interventionsOngoing formative assessment collection & analysis timelineInvolvement of teachers in the data feedback
By April 2008, complete the following:AEA Service Plan for 2008-2009Embed the IDM action plan inside the AEA Service Plan
Action Planning – Creating a Draft
Communication of ASAP Vision, Expectations, OutcomesTo Whom?When?
Establishing RelationshipsWith Whom?How?
Selection of 30 StudentsWho will select?How?
Mapping IDMWho will map?How?
Creating 08-09 Service PlanWho will create the plan?How?
Set meeting Time for Later this Summer
Evaluation of the Day
Journaling
Likert Scale – Please do not hesitate to identify areas in which you would like assistance.
Agency Professional Development Form