PRICE f,2.00 NUMBER 3Ibufora.org.uk/documents/UFOTimesNo.31Nodate1994.pdf · 2017. 8. 3. · AGAIhI! THE CORDONFAULKNER INTERYIEW: 26TH AFRIL 1994 BYJOHNSPENCER In 1965 Cordon Faulkner

PRICE f,2.00 NUMBER 3I ISSN 09584846

EditorialDoing Ufology

BUFORA has reached a ctossroads.Decisions have to be made as to whichdirection this Association should go.For some time the cracks have beenshowing, that v/e as a UFO research

organisation have been somewhat lack-ing in adhering to our very importantaims and objectives.

The BUFORA Council has been le-thargic in realising that we are simplenot 'Doing Ufology'. There are manyreasons for this. But to be frank andhonest, we have been too busy arguingamongst ouselves to find time for theAssociation.

But times are a changing.

Over the summer there has been aCouncil reshufile where I have beengiven the job to overhaul BUFORA.From top to bottom if necessary; drag-ging it into the nineties.

I am determined to see that we will 'doufology' first and foremost and give themembership extra Yalue for money.

Thc most urgent rcquircment is to revi-talise the research department.

Admittedly, BUFORA has and contin-ues to develop important researchprojects but has failed to deliver the

'bread and butter' aspects of research;

such as regular case evaluations,processing and analysing photographicevidence and acting as a vital support toinvestigalions.

We must review and expand our lectureprogramme so we not only luve a Lon-don Lecture programme but also a Man-chester programme, a Birminghamprogramme or where ever the demand

will be. This is a challenging commit-ment but I want to see this one throughas it benefits you the member.

Ufo Times

I would also like to encourage better co-operalion with other liFO groups withinthe UK, where we can help and behelped by. local UFO investigation or-ganisations. Fostering better links andsharing information with other groups

is a vital component in undentandingthe UFO phenomenon. The failure toembrace the importance of greater

intergroup co-operation is. in my view,the reason why we, as ufologists, are nonearer the answers we strive to obtaintoday, than our predecessors were in1947 .

And finally, BUFORA is viewed as a

bureaucratic organisation, slow to reactand not really on the pulse of things.Throughout this reorganisation, I amdetermin€d not to add to the bureauc-racy but to cut it and reduce the costs ofadministration and channel it to directresearch.

I have only shared some of my ideas

with you, but it must be rememberedthat BUFORA is not my Association,its not the Council's Association, itsyour Association. To make this reor-ganisation work I need to know whatyou want; what you expect to get fort20.00 and what you expect us to dowith regard to UFO research. Please

\,!rite to me via the BUFORA officeaddress and air your views and get ac-tive!

A Bigger ReadIn our first move to give you value formoney, we have decided to increasethenumber ofpages in UT from 20 to 24.

Producing the magazine is the largest

single expenditure the association has

to bear . However, after careful negotia-tions with our new pdnter, InformationManagement. we have been able toclinch a more favourable deal and we

have passed on the savings made, di-rectly on to you in the form ofa largermagazine.

We will also strive to improve the con-tent and aim to broaden the ufologicaltopics covered over the coming year bysupporting Ken with a dedicated edito-rial team where articles will be carefullychosen and commissioned to reflect ouraims and objectives.

Mike Wootten

CONTENTS

Issue Number Thirty-one

Pages Three, Four and FiveThe Gordon Feulkner IntervierYPage FiveAllergies and Aliens - The Visitr-tion ExperiencePages Six and Seven

The Final secret of Free EnergyPages Eight, Nine, Ten, Elevenarul TwelyeInvestigations DieryPages Twelve and ThirteenNewsfilePages Fourteen and FifteenInside The See ShadowPages Sixteen and Seventeen

IJF0 SnapshotsPages Eighteen, Nineteen andTwentyRerders WritePages Twenty-one and TwenQ-tw^o

The Xenobiotic PresencePage TwentylhreeBUFORA Information

(C)Bufo.a Lid 1994

AGAIhI!THE CORDONFAULKNER

INTERYIEW: 26TH AFRIL 1994

BYJOHNSPENCER

In 1965 Cordon Faulkner made thefront pages - and a double spread in thecentre pages - ofthe national newspaperT he D ai h M i rro r. He had photographeda UFO - nicknamed 'The Thing' inWarminsterand local reporterand UFOenthusiast Athur Shuttlewood had takenthe report, and the photo, to the DailyMirror. It was not a particularly impres-sive photo, and offered little in the wayof substantial evidence for UFO re-searcheru; nonethcless it was an impr-rr-tant item. The photo became a symbolof Warminster and focused Britain onthat area as a UFo-centre. In the yearsthat followed - with ArthurShuttlewood's local enthusiasm -Warminster became one of the world'simpo rta nt UFO concentrations.Faulkner's photograph was therefore ofenormous social significance. giving a

visual imageto those who craved it ofaphenomenon.

Then, in early 1992, a man called RogerHooton sought me out to tell me that hehad t'aked the photo with GordonFaulkner. He presented a good case,plenty ofevidence that he was the localWarminster resident of the time that hesaid he was, and that he worked for the\l'arminster Joumal for a short time(which I confirmed through their em-ployment records). The case seemedcutand dried - indeed it still may be so andthe photo may well be a fake -but twoquestions remained open in my mindwhich I hoped to pursue. Fintly, I wantedArthur Shuttlewood's comnents on thematter and I wrote to him twice. I nevergot a reply other than a comment fiom

Ufo Times

his wife that he was not in the best ofhealth and not involved in the subjectany more. I did not trouble the familyfurther, and I understand from a localreporter who more recently spoke to thefamily that the situation is still un-changed other than possibly further de-terioration in Arthur Shuttlev/ood'shealth. The second important factor !t'asthat I wanted to speak to GordonFaulkner but I could not locate him. Iunderstood he was in Australia. Enquir-ies through several contacts there provedftuitless and I lei the matter rest whilekeeping one eye on locating him oneday.

When Faulkner did tum up it was. infact, just a few miles up the Ml fromwhere I live. and on the 26th April 1994I drove to Staffordshire to meet withhim. He runs a microlight flying schoolthere. And Gordon had a quite differenttale to tell. He maintained that thephotogreph wes genuine; further,that he did not know of Hooton andcertainly had notconspired with him.

There could be no misunderstanding;one ofthetwo has tobe lying. Both wereclearly talking about the same photo-graph.

Firstly I had the cheek to ask Gordonhou' he could prove he was who he saidhe was; he showed me his pilot's iden-tifications and his credit and cashpointcards. Mostly they are in the name ofL.G.G. Faulkner, which is conect (as

per the initial letter to the Warminster.lournal in 1965).

We spent some time chatting generallyabout Gordon's life since i965, aboutUFOs generally - in which Gordon haslittle interest, incidentally - and aboutTHAT photogmph and RogerHooton'sclaims. Then I went through a list ofspecific questions for the record, not€dbelow:

J: Canyou give meyour birthdayand lull name.

3G: 19.8.1942. Les lie GordonGilrov Faulknet.

J: Can you leII me where you havebe m c h ro n o I ogic al Iy for t he p as t n e arly30 yean since the picTure was lakcn?

G: As best I can remember. After tak-ing lhepiclute I wenl l.r Auslrulia. Thutwas early in 1966. I came back Ibelieve in 1 969, three years later. Stayedin England for three vears, and lhenworked in Hollandfor awhile. Correc-tion, I wenl backto lustralia in betw,een

tines. Then I worked back here inEnglawl, I wttrked in Holland, cameback to England, did someflving workin Sweden. I've been involved inflyingnow for, I suppose, fourteen to ffteen.veurs, und professionally - as un in-slruclor-for the last nine to kn years inthis country. Based in Herefordshireand in Staffordshire.

J: Let'sget it inyourword,s, oncemore

for the record. Just descfibe it to meagain how the photo cameto be taken.

G: I jusl came out and there it was.

The camera was in my hand, I saw it,and I thought, I must get lhis. It wasmoring hut it v'osn t moking ony noise.It v'as moving rea$,fast.

J: And,forthe record: RogerHootortsals that yoa tnd hefaked the piaure.Did youT

G: No, and I repedt, I don't knowRoger Hoolon, Aslurus I umconcernedhe is u liar.Regarding this question of 'Is it afakeor isn't it a.fake?' I'm repeating whatI've always said. No, it isn't afake.There are people over lhe years whohave gone to quite a lot of trouble todiscredit the picture. Thefrst one wusa Getman chap whose name I forget.He wrote to me and I replied quiteopenlv and the leuer I got in responsev)as lo sdy that the pictufe, was a fakebecause of the image size on the nega-

4tive. That it couldn't have been in lheposition that I guessed it was. I think Iguessed it must have been somewherebaween half a mile and a mile away.But it was only a guess. He is ralherconvinced that the picture was a fake.But I don't really want to get into thistechnical drea: I l(now what happened.

I: How did. you hear sboul RogetHooton?

G: On the W. On Frtda1, just afterreturningfrom Portugal, it would havebeen about tu,o weeks ago now. It v,asan eeening news iten, probably HW orBBC Bristol, I don't loow v,hich. We

only caught the last 2 or so minutes ofil.

J: What was your feeling when youheard what was being said?

G: Astonishment. I don't know RogerHooton. I've never met him which I 've

said to the Wiltshire Times und vour-self. He litted in the same toa)n at thesame time so our paths might havecrossed, but to the best of my recollec-tion I ve never met the man. I've cer-tainly never co-operated with him onany hoax.

,I: Roger Hooton suggested that ac-cording to lhe time given fut the paperyou had taken the piaure in almostdarkness and yet thal doesn't seem lobewhal's come out on the frhn. Howdo you account lot that point that hehas raised?

G: It wasn't dark, it was ddylight. Idon't btow where he gets his iffirmu-tion from.

J: Do you know what time il was?

G: I can't remember now.

(Note: The newspaper account has thephoto taken at 8.2Opm. t}etimegiven inFaulkner's original letter to the

afo Times

Warminster Joumal. That would be af-ter sundown in that area according totimes given in the newspaper; whatlight would have been available is some-thing to be re-tested by experiment witha matching camera. - JS)

J: Can yoa tell me where the nega-tives arc at the moment?

G: I'm sorry. I believe they are lost.Many, manl,moves, many, many upsand dov'w, a fev, divorces and a fanrelationships since then. And I havetravelled a lot. Soms*'here olong theline there they got lost.

J: Can I just conftrm thst you have

had them : lhE) weren't given to ArthurS huttlewood ? I got th e im pression fiomhis book, Waminslct Mistery, thatyou'd given lhem lo him. In facl Ithought the book said that you'dhandcd overthe copyrightta rirn. (Note:

I checked afterwards, the books statesthat Faulkner said to Shuttlewood "Theprint and negative are yours, fiee, iftheyare any use to you. " - JS)

G: No, thev weren't given to ArthurShuttlan'ood. And there u,as onlv onenegative, only one picture.

,I: Have you ever made any mone!oul ofthe picTure, or your uperiences,or whatever?

G: Yes, I think I got ablut t50 when itappeared in the Dail.v l,linor.

J: Areyou making any money out ofit now?

G: No.

J: Have you *er seen another UFOapart from thal onc?

G: No.

J: lYould you like to hazard a guessas to what you beliew your UFO was?

G: No. I don'tfeel qualifed to gtess.But it was delinilelv something I haven'tseen before or since. I fuaught it h;as

hig. I thinkit was perhapsfurther awaltthan I thought it v,as.

J: Do youwanlto give meyoar guessas lo whal aFOs generally are?

G: In the meanwhile I have retd toomany booksfor them not to have influ-enced my opinion. I lhink they can

Probab\, be grouPed into all the con-glomerate 0f phenomenu. I wouldn'tliketo commentfurther on that. I don'tbelieve in little green men -from Marsand I havereatl a bit ohout lheintefftel-lar distances involved and itjust seems

a bit unlikely.

J. ll/ould you like lo do a talk toBAFORA to put your side of it?

G: I think I would probablv not. Iprefer to keep the thing at a distance.

(Note: Gordontold me that he had littleinterest in UFOs, and that he had been

somewhat troubled by the type ofpeo-ple that had pestered him in 1965; he

didn't want a repeat of that - JS).And so the debate goes on. It will

only be resolved ifthe photo can besubjectedto analysis - and that wouldprobably require the negatives - or ifthe person lying admits so. I havepublished this interviewto give bothsides of the debate. and to giveGordon his chance to rectifon'hat hesees as lying by Roger Hooton.ln the meantime I am writing againto Rogerwherehe now lives (backtoAustralia again!) and ifanything nev,'breaks readers of UFO Times wlllbethe first to know.

AD}TRTISING INUFO TIMES - RATES

The UFO Times is a bi-monthly,illustrated magazine and in ,44 format,normally of28/32 pages. It is read by UFOresearchers and in\,€stigators worldwideald has a circulation ofapproximately 500,nearly a quarter of which is scnt overseas.

The UFO Times is available by sub.scription, or by exchange with similar pub.lications; lt is sent liee to Association mem-bers.

Advertising is accepted at the fol-lowing rates:-

DISPLAY ADS.

Full page........... #50-00

Halfpage........... #30-00 (\€rticalor horizontal)

Quaner page........ # 1 8-00

Eighth page......... #10-00

I camera-ready artwork please )

PMMIUM - inside back cover 250lo

outside back cover 50% (only available byarrangement with the editor).

CLASSIFIED

Column inch.......... f3-00 (boxed !2-00 extra).Ads. nlust beingood taste and subjectto cditor's disctction in accordancc withBIIFORA policy. Small ads. (30 words or so)are fre€ to members ilnoncommercial.

Ufo Times

Budden A,, Discovery Times Press.

I shall not say much about the con-tents of this booklet - which is aprecursor to a more comprehensivehardback by the author and which isdue to be published next year - as Ihave featured an article by him cov-ering the subject of allergies else-where inthisissue. However, I tvouldlike to be allowed to make a fewobservations of my own here.

Firstly, and in the book's favour, thehypothesis developed by Budden isboth testable and universal in scope(a rare thing in ufology!) since allone has to do when investigatingclose encounters isto get the witnessto answer a 25-page questionnairebased on personal health and envi-ronmental factors: i.e. check for theproximity of electromagneticallyenritting installations and associated'hot spots', etc. After all, such aprlcedure does not required techni-cal knowledge or expertise; just thepowers of observation on behalf ofinvestigators.

Once this check is done, researchwill then determine whether or notBudden andhis colleagues are on theright track. Moreover, such a surveyshould overcome the main weaknessin Budden's hypothesis: the ex-tremely small number of his sample(n = 19, as opposed to many thou-sands of existing reports). If thenumber of subjects could be raisedto, say, >100, then this would havethe effect of erecting a powerfulsignpost as to where UFO researchshould be going in the future.

Another powerful factor in Budden'sfavour is that the hallucinationscaused by allergies couldexplain theabsurdities met in the close encoun-ter experiences; something whichhas always worried me as an inves-tigator of25 years standing. Havingsaidthis, however, there remains thehard-core ofCEIs and CEIIs as wellas those radar-visuals ard photoswhich so puzzled the Condon Com-mittee. Try as one might, it is verydifficult to conceive of electromag-netically-induced hallucinations pro-ducing synmetrical ground traoes,genuine photos and films as well asimages in the gun-sights of fighterinterceptors, etc.

f)espite these misgivings, one has toremain objective in the field ofufology and be willing to consideralternative hypotheses. And, ofcourse, electromagnetic pollution isbecoming a terrible threat to the en-vironment and its inhabitants. How-ever, even ifBudden fails to providea universal hypothesis for UFOs, hemight go a long way in explainingmuch in this field, including thoseintractable abductions.

For an investment ofa couple ofbob,the book is good value, well *dtten,non-jargonistic and informative - buyit!

Ken.

(To be reviewed in the next edition:Steuart Campbell's The UFO Mys-tery Sohted, and Ken Llewelyt'sFlight into the Ages - Ed.)

Ufo Times

THE FINAL SECRET OF FREEENERGY

By T. E. Beardon

PARTvI

THE FREEENERGYPRINCIPLE

A[ potential gradient (trappsd excess en-ergy deruity) is ftee for the taking a. Thepotential is due to the violent \?F ex-change between the vacurmr and the sepa-

rated biJnlar charges fumishingthe s<urcepcential gradiem. The energy ofthe entire

universe is flowing through that source

pot€Iltial. You can have as much of thisinternalVPF fluxenergy (potential) as youwisll as often as yor wish, so long as you

don't dernand current (which is power, orthe rate at which th€ energy is being freed

ard dissipated.). It's really simple. Youcan have all the trapped energy you wislr.from any source. You carulot conn€ct tothe source and start to dissipale the energy

as power, however, withorl starting toclose the 'gate' from which your free,

trapped energy is coming.

In other wdds, here's the iron nrle: ifyoudraw current, you kill the bipolarity gate

fumishing the potential gmdient(source ofenergy density). In that case you kill the

source, Ifyou do not draw ctrrent, you donot kill tle bipolarity gpte and you do notshut down the source. ln that case, you can

continue to 'use' it and extract aapped EMenergy fiom it fuever.

DEFINITIONS AGAIN

I'll put down some sifiDle equations that

miy help to explain it mce exactly, but

ftrst we repeat some definitions.

Erergy is any ordering imposed upon the

virnral particle fluxofvacuun. EM energyis any ordering imposed upon tb€ virtu4l

photonflu:qofthe racunn. Static energy is

an ordering (a tenplate) which is sratidl-ary with respect to the extemal obsen'er.Dynamic energy is an ordering (a tem-plate) which is stationary with respect tothe extemal obs€rver.

Potential: Any ordering imposed upon the

virtual particle flux of vacuum. Scalarpotential is an ordering (t€mplate) dnt isnot moving with resp€ct to the externalobserver. Vector potential is an ordering(t€mplate) that is moving with respect tothe external observer.

The scalar EM potential is any satrc (wrrh

respect to tle extemal observer) orderingimposed upcn the virtul photon flux ofvacuu& etc.

Note again that energy and potential have

exacdy the same definition. Potential is infact trapped energy. Scalar EM potential is

static EM energy(totheextemal observer)

or napped (collected) EM energy. In other

words, if one takes off a differential ofpotential onto a fixed number of Cou-lombs, (){re takes offa certainmaefitude oftrapped EM energy; i.e. one takes out ashovelful ot coal liom lhe coal car.

IMPORTANCE OF SEPARATIONOFCHARGES

W€ must not dispel the separation ofcharges in ow source : the difference in ourcoal-fued train analogy and oru electricalcircuit is that, in the coal train the coal inthe coal car is nc'l automatically ard con-tinually replenished. Also, the coal in the

coal car has already been collecred by the

mass ofthe coal car, so it is not infinite. Inthe electrical c ircuit, the pot€ntial gradient

in the primary source is continually replen-

ished, automatically, and it is infinite(lhough it has a finite energy density). Thereason is simple. EM potential (in'thenormal sense) is actually a virtual photon

flux exchange between the vacuurn (the

entire vacuurn, all overthe universe) urd a

charged particle or collection of chargedparticlesr. Thus the potential (gridient) isa powerfirl energy flu:q purnped by the

vacuum and the entire universe, drat con-tinws autonatically, so l(xrg as we do notallow the collected charges in or bipolar-ity source to be dissipared. In tenns of ebattery, *'e achieved sepamtionof charges

inside the battery by chemical action, and

we pid for that initially. Once separated,

the charges essentiallystay separated (be-

cause of the chemistry), unless we fool-ishly do sornething to dissipate them, such

as upsetting tlle chemistry, so they are nolonger separated positive fforn negative.

So if we don't do an''thmg to these sepa-

raled charges, they continue to be drivenby their fierce exchange of virtual photon

flux with the vacuuniuniverse. Ifwe tlren

simply exnact some ofthat flux exchange,

wilhout moving the charges, we are di-rectly 'gating' trapped EM energy fromthe vacuum/charged particle VPF ex-change2s.

TIIE POTTNTIAL IS INFINITf,ANDSO

IS ITS ENf,RGY CONTENT

You can't dip the ocean dry with a spoon:

Let's say that another *'ay. The chargedparticles lrr our potential source are in aconstant, scething, cquilibnium exchange

ofrapped EM energy with the ennre uni-verse. Thal energy exchange is so enor-mous that, if we gate sorne of it out tocollect on some other'temporarily fiozen'charges and potentialiseiactivate then-r, the

vacuum flux doesn't evenmiss it.lt's like

dipping a spoonful of wat€r out of theresdess ocean. The hole is instantly filled,andthewater replenished. We candipwiththat spoon as much as u'e rvisb and lheoceur will never run dry, but wil simplycontinue to filrrish us water, spoonfirl byspoonful.

Tlre same istrue inour electric circuits. Wecan have all the potential (napped EMenergy density) we wi$q for free, from asingle sor:rce, so long as we do not allowwork o be done inside the source to closeoffor.n 'gate' and kill our primary sorrce.

TIIT TWISTEI} CONCEPTOFVOLTAGE

Before we develop some ps€ldo-equa-tions: Inthe equations we wishtodevelop,we have one poblem dw to the lack ofinsight of conventional, electrical physi-cists. Thatis, trcyhave insistedrpon 'meas-uring' and expressing bdh the infinitepotential (nondissipared) and a certainquantity ofpotential (dissigated) in volts.Solhey say "a potential ofsomany volts".That's nonsense, and totally erroneous.fugorously. a voltage isa dropor adissipa-tion of so much (a finite amount o0 col-lectedexcess potentiaven€rgy. You'meas-ure' the voltage in a voltmeta by irnpress-ng a pOential gradiant r4nn the electrongas in the circuin-y, wherein you collect, orget in your voltrneter, so much ((Joules/

Coulomb) x Coulunbs). A tiny curent(Coulombs/secord) ftom this intemal col-lection then flows for a finite time throughthe resisgnce of the volfineter. So youdissipate (JouleVCoulomb) x (CoulombVsecond) x (seconds). which gives a cenainamount of energy dissipated as s'ork inmoving the needle of the voltmeter. Thevoltneter is calibrated so that it effectivelyindicates the collected energy per Cou-lomb that was dissipated, and it calls thatentity voltags. It involves a fmite amormtofenergy that has already been dissipatedas work, and it's a measure of the localerrrgy density ofthe potential in terms ofJouleVCoulomb; it is not a measure ofthepotential proper. It's after the facl: theextracted (collected) potential gradient itactually refers to existed in th€ past, b€fo{ethe work (dissipation of the collected,trapped energy) was done. To refer to thepotential before its dissipation as 'voltage'

Ufo Times

is precisely the same as confirsing theftrtrre with the past. A 'potential (differ-ence) of so many volts' is ach:ally a state-

ment that 'a poertial diference of somuch energy per Coulomb' could be dis-sipated in a loa( ifitwere cormectedtotheload so thar a finib amount ofenergy wascollected, and this finite load-collectionwas allowed to dissipate as power (volts/Coulomb x Coulomtr/sec) for a finite time,yieldingwut. It'sevenwuse, butit wouldtake a textbook to straighten out thrs meenoinEMtheory.

Sowe'llleave it at that, ardwe'll adapt dre

ndion of potential the way it is comptedin electrical circuit theory. There it's usednct really as energy, bls rather as excess

energy per Coulomb of potentialisedcharge. I apologisefothatdifficulty, whichis not ofmy ownmrking, btlt I mu$ use theconventional notion if we are to greadyclari! the pseudo-equatioru.

THE EQUATIONS OFTREEENERGY

The pseudo-equations: Let us use the fol-lorlurg subscrips and lett€r convention,and develop the nomenclatue needed:-

T =trapped d = dissipated or dis-sipating

n = narslated (moving) K=en-ergy

y = yel15 = potential drop (potentialdissipated) = previously collected poten-tial

radiated away as heat in aload, doing work onthe load inthe process

(Unfortunately we shall alsohave to speakof a potential gradient that is not beingdissipated, so we shall have to speak of'tapped volts', which is erroneous, butcomplies with the common usage.)

> = electrostatic s€alar pot€ntialCoul = Coulombs

i: amperes : dissipatingpc*entialised Coulunbs per second flow-ing, so amps are

somerhing tanslating, al-ways.

7

(Amps are excited Coulombs per secondthat are dissiparing their excitation. Withsuperconductivityexcfuded yon onlyhaveamps *ten you have a potential dropacross aload. So we will speak ofamps as

'dissiparing', meaning thar pcentialisedelectrons are tavelling through a load,

dissipating their activatim (gradients) inthe load by radiating scattered photurs(hea$.

n = nmber of electons in a Cou-lomb = 6.3 x 1018 electqdCoulomb.

Here are the pseudo+quations (supercur-ductivity is excluded):-

ampm = could/sec = n electonsrn/sec = n electonsd/sec (l)

b> = VT (As conventionally re-ferred o. It would be volts ifall of it were(2)

dissipated. but it is notyet dissipated, so it is sort of

'tapped vols'. Eno-neous, but the common use. So we shall

speak (smrcwbat dis-tast€firly) of'tapped volts' and

'dissipated volts'.

Vd x ampd x sec : wafis x sec :power x tirne = wor* = Kd (3)

Vd x could/sec xsec = (work) =Kd(4)

In the switching, we switch to KT to Kd,so:-

Kr_Kd (5)

ButVTxcoulT=KT (6)

Or:-

(VT = (KT/(conlT) = tapped en-ergyltap,pedcoulomb (7)

(KT) = (VT) x (coulT) = amoun oftramed en€rgy, each cycle (8)

So tlEt's what we were getting at: theamountof trappedenergy you cantransfer

Continued on page fourleen

THE WALES AIIDWEST COUNTRYSIGHTINGS OF

30th/3lst MARCHt993

PART II

by Doug Cooper

Despite the fact that our Devon Co-ordinator is still smarting over thewdyhis reports and photographs were con-

fiscated, Doug has vem kindly allowedU.T. to print his report summaries ofthefascinating events of the above date

- Ed.

At sometime between 01.10 and 01.17.two very bright, white objects with some

sort of vaDour trails, were observedflying N.W. to S.E. at high altitude andparallel to each other and appeared tohave been on a pre-determined course.

These were, I believe, the remnants ofaRussian space rocket that had earlierdepositedaCosmos Radio Satellite intoorbit. However, at the same time, i.e.

01.10, two brightly lit objects, ora verylarge one with two lights attached,

crossed the Bristol Channel, flew lowover Lynton, and somewhere between

there and Liskeard, came to a halt and

hovered for a few seconds. Theyiit thenascended at great speed to about 10,000'

and then altered coune, taking a south-erly bearing over the English Channel.

If the information contained in the

letter from the MOD is conect, then the

object, or objectsn were later seen over

Ufo Tbnes

or near Bristol, Avon, at approximately01.15, heading south-easterlyl Also, iftheMOD information is conect, similarobjects were seen between 2 I . l0 on the30th March 1993, and 02.40 on the

3lst., covering an area flom Comwallto South Yorkshirel The implication ofthis being that some 4 hours before there-entry, an 'unknown' object, or ob-jects were flying across the Westcountry,up into Avon and on to S. Yorks., withthe last lorownsighting over Shropshireat 02.40. It also indicates that the ob-jects appeared to becriss<rossing these

areas during this period.

EVENT .C': BRIDGEWATER,SOMERSET

On Wednesday 31st. March 1993, agroup of fishermen (known as Elvers)were fishing in the River Parrett, nearBridgewater. Somerset. At approx i-mately 01.30 they noticed 3 ntilitary-fype helicopters flying in a radius fromBridgewater to Hinkley Point. This ac-tivity was observed for some 30 min-utes or so and, at a little before 02.00,the 'Elvers' saw 2 bright, orange<ol-oured lights approaching from the north.

As they drew closer, the 'Elvers', whohad previously thought that the lightswere the retuming helicopters, realisedtliat they were not. Firstly, there was the

absence of any engine or rotor-bladenoise and navigation lights. Secondly,

the objects approachedthe Elvers' posi-tion at a steady paoe, not over fast, and

appeared to be at the height of about

800'. On their final approach, and inaddition to the orange lights seen, 2

very bright, white lights seemed to be

glowing fiom the rearofthe objects. Asthey passed overhead, One ofthe Elvers(Vemon Rolles) thoughtthe obj ects werejoined by some sort of structure and

likened this to a " large catamaran". As

the objects cleared their position,2 verybright light sources were seen at the rearof the'craft ', throwing lightbeams back-wards. These were described as like carheadlights, and what amazed the sightersmost (Vemon Rolles and MervynKelly)was lhe complete absence or noisel infact quitethe opposite - deathlysilence!The objects proceeded on a south-east-erly course to\.\'ards Dorset and uere in

view for 2 to 3 minutes before disap-pearing.

I have penonally spoken to both oithese gentlemen and received a writtenreport fiom one (Mr. Rolles). Mr. Kellyhas not retumed his report form, and

this I believe isbecause he has difftcultyin writing (don't wealll?), and thereforefeel it best not to pursue the matter anyfurther.

One other interesting point that I noted

during the convenation with VemonRolles, wasthis: during the early hous,somewhere between midnight and01.00, the cows occupying an adjacentfield appeared to be very restless which,I am told, is very unusual. Just aftertheirsighting, Vemon, Menyn and theirwives, were astonished to see all the

cows had congregated in the middle ofthe field and were all facing each other

in a circular formation and had gone

very quiet! This is I'm told also veryunusual.

EVENT'D'- N. DEVONAND SOMERSET.

During the evening of Tuesday 30th

March 1993, 6 independent witnesses

reported an object, or objects, flyingover and/or hovering over Somerset

and N. Devon.

The first sighting occurred at 21.00,

when Mrs. Susan Wyatt observed 2glowing, white/orange objects hover-ing north-west of her position. At thetime, she was travelling from her homeat Kingstone-SlMary, Somerset, to-wards Bishop Lydeard and thought theobjects were somewhere above, orjustbeyond, the tourn. They remained sta-tionary for some 2 or 3 minutes, werevery silent and Mrs. Wyatt got the feel-ing that "something was going to hap-pen, as everything seemed to have gonevery quiet! She evenhrally lost sight ofthe objects behind some clouds.

Meanwhile, Ceofty Thomas, a localbusiness man who lives at CrowcombeHeathfi el4 near Lydeard-SFLawrence,Somerset -just nofth of Bishops Lydeard- had gone out into his gardento feed hisfish. It was about 20.00, and on lookingup, observed a triangulax formation of 3objects approximately 5 miles north-west of his home. They were brightly lit(self luminous) and each object waslarger than a star. He likened them togolf balls, 2 at the top with the otherimmediately below. From the lowestobject, a light beam seemed to be shin-ing down at an angle of about 45 de-grees. Mr. Thomas kept the objects inview for a little over 3 hours. Duringthis time. his daughter (Jane) had alsobeen out to see the objects and hasconfirmed the sighting.

Atthis point, I think it is worth pointingout that, from the evidence, theobject(s)seen by M$. Wyatt and Mr. Thomas areprobably one and the same. The direc-tion is right (i.e. north-west), and al-though Mrs. Wyatt feels the object(s)rvere over Bishops Lydeard, I think inthis she could be mistaken and and thatthey were a bit further away towards theN.W.

The third report came fiom P.C. Filerwho is stationed at Bishops Lydeard.His report (byphone) was as follows: atapproximately 21.00, he was up on the

Quantock Hills, N. Somerset, with agroup ofscouts carrying out some fieldexercises, when his attention was drawnto a series ofbright lights approaching

Ufo Times

from the north-west. They appeared tobe at a height of3,000' and travelling ata constant speed, but not over fast! Asthe lights got closer, he made out theoutline of a large craft which, he said,"looked like two Concordes flying side-by-side andjoined together". The lightshe had seen appeared to be around theobject(s) and were similarto cabin lightson an aircraft, only much brighter. Theobject passed to his left, and after 2 or 3minutes, was lost to sight as it pro-ceeded on a south-easterly couse.

Strangely, as with the other P.Cs., de-spite a$eeing to complete a report form,this has never been retumed - I wonderwhy?

At approximately 22.30, Mr. IanWanick, a traffic warden, was standingoutside his home on the Sandhill ParkEstate at Bishops Lydeard when he no-ticed a brightly lit object approachingfrom the south. At arm's length, hedescribes the object as about the size ofa'Zippo' lighter, and had 6 rows oflights numbering 30 in all. They were in2 srrtions of 15 which were spaced in 3rou's of 5 lights each.

The object's speed was similar to ajetaircraft and appeared to be at a highaltitude. Because of this, Mr. Warrickhad the object in sight for nearly 15

minutes before it disappeared to thenorth. Some 5 minutes after the event,Mr. Warrick observed a civil airliner onthe same course at approximately thesame altitude and he was able to iden-tiry this without any problem.

The sth report came from Mr. peterHeal who lives in Tar.rnton, Somerset.At approximately 22.20 (maybe a bitlater) he observed 2 white lights, appar-ently connected, flying parallel to eachother in an easterly direction. Again,there was no noise fiom the objects andthey appeared to be moving very fast.He gave the length ofhis sighting as 2minutes and is convinced itlthey wasnot an aircraft.

The 6th and last repot for this evening

9came from Mr Vaughn Vdall, who livesat Milverton, Devon. At sometime be-fore midnight - about 23.30 - he saw 2groups of lights flying alongside ofeach other. He describes them as 2objects with 3 lights in a triangularformation. He says that they were mov-ing very fast and watched them for 2minutes before they disappeared in asouth-westerly direction.

NOTES

From these reports it is obvious rhat

during the evening (20.00 to 23.00) anobject(s) was clearly visible and seenhovering over N. Devon. This is sub-stantiated by Mrs. Wyatt and Mr.Thomas in their reports. In addition,other objects ofa similart)?e were seentraversing the sky from north to southand sowh to north. Although the reportsare not identical - i.e. they are differentin their description - they do indicatethat a fairly large, twin-hulled craft wasairbome that evening and flying lowoversome areas. What this object was isofcou$e unknown and must, therefore,temporarily at least, be classed as aUFO.

+++++++

THE DOI's COUPLE OFBOBSWORTH:-

93J13

Date: 16-1 1-93, Cockbumspath, Ber-wickshire. Inv.: G. Dixon.

Tracey F. and two ofherfriends were inher bedroom at around 7.30 pm whenherbrotherdownstairs observed abrightlight through the living room windows.Tracey's brother alerted her and herfriends and they all observed an oval-shaped object which hovered directlyoverthe house. They all ran outside and*atched the object move out ofsight inthe distance.

EVALUATION : aircraft /helicopter.

++++++

l0

93-218.

Date: 7 -12-9f , Edgware, Middx. Inv.:M. Lewis.

At around 19.15/25, JohnL. was stood

at the bus stop when he observed abright, orange, starlike object fly oversome nearby railway lines. There wereseveral lights around the object. Thelights were green, red and blue. At one

point,.John even claimed he was tel-epathically contacted by the object. Hisbus anived, he got on it and lost sight ofthe object.

'EVALUATION: helicopter (in tel-epathic contact!? Ed).

++++++

93-l l9A.

Date: l0-12-93, Chateridge, Bucks. Inv.:M. Lewis.

Onthe date in questior, at 21.00, Ms. H.was driving though darh country lanes

in Bucks. Ms. H's sister was in the carwith her and it was she who first ob-served two large balls of light (station-

ary) in the sky. They observed these fora few minutes whilst driving down theroad. Suddenly, the lights moved offvery quickln so Ms. H. stopped the carand tumed off the lights and engine tosee if anlhing else could be observed.Looking overhead, they then observed atriangle with lights all around it. Theobject also had beams of light comingdown from it. Moving slowlyaway, theobject then stopped and remained sta-

tionary for around half an hour.

EVALUATION: helicopter (a helicop'ter lhe shape ofa "triangle " hovering

for half an hour!? Ed).

++++++

93-221.

Date: 17 -12-93 ,Chester, Cheshhe. Inv. :

P. Noden.

Ufo Times

It was around 18.55 when Deborah J.

was waiting fora bus. She noticed whatseemed to be a series of white lightswhich appeared to be going round incircles. The lights moved fairly quicklygver the area without making any unu-sual manoeuvres.

EVALUATION: possible aircraft .

++++++

93-222.

Date: December '93, Chester. Inv.: P.

Noden.

Andrew K. was driving home from workat around 22. I 5 when he observed somelights in a field. He looked back but the

lights were gone. This same thing hap-pened two days later. In the 9 years thatAndrew has been driving along thisroad, he has never seen these lightsbefore or since the two nights in ques-

tion.

EVALUATION: open.

++++++

In January 1994, a spate of sightingswere reported in and around the city ofChester- So many reports were made

that BUFORA investigator. P. Noden,is still working onthem. Here follows a

briefselection of some ofthe sightingsreported investigared by P. Noden:-

93-223.

Date: January '94, Churton, Chester.Inv.: P. Noden.

Whilst out walking his dogs, Mr. G.observed a singular, bright light in the

sky for 4 - 5 minutes. The light re-

mained in view until he went into hishouse.

94-200.

Date: January '94, Plasneuton, Ches-

ter. Inv.: P. Noden.

It was 21.30 when Louise H. was sittingin her living room and her mum drewher attention to a bright 'thing' in the

sky outside. Louise went outside to get

a better look and observed a cigar-shapedobject displaying white, red and bluelights. The object then moved off intothe distance.

94-202.

Date: 3-l-94, Tarporley, Cheshire. Inv.:P. Noden.

At around 23.15, Mr. and Mrs. T. ob-served ayellow oval-shaped obj ect dis-appear behind some nearby houses.

94-204.

Date: l7-l-94, Sealand, Chester. Inv.:P. Noden.

At 08.20, Andrew J. was being driven towork by a friend when they both ob-

served a grey "line" in the sky somedistance away. The grey line started togetbigger, then went backto its originalsize. lt was eventually lost from vieubehind buildings. Retuming fiom workon the same day, at eround 17.10, bothwitnesses observeda bright, white lightwhich hovered fora while before shoot-

ing off.

94-206.

Date: 2l-l-94, Sealand, Chester. Inv.:P. Noden.

At 17.34,AndrewH. was walkingto the

bus stop when a bright light seen out ofthe comer ofhis eye attracted his atten-

tion. Looking up, he noticed a white"egg-shaped" object which had a glow-ing, red square across the middle. The

object was lost from view behind some

tall buildings.

(Although it might not explain all ofthese sightings. it would not surprise

me in the least ifan airship of some sort

was the culprit - P. Mantle).

++++++

94-210.

Date: 5-2-94, Peterborough. Inv.: R.Bull.

Mr. Alan G. was driving home fromwork at around 18.20, and had justjoinedthe by-pass, when he noticedtwoorange light in the sky. They were mov-ing fairly quickly so Alan gave chase.

Cat€hing them up, they were now twowhite lights with a duller "sparkling"light in between them. After approxi-mately l0 seconds, the lights movedoverhead and now looked like 4 lightsin a diamond formation. A dull sound,rather like a tmnsformer, was heard.

Alan contacted the neafty RA.F bases tocheck for aircraft activity, but the bases

could not offer any assistance.

EVALUATION: possible aircraft,/heli-copter.

++++++

94-2tt.

Date: 7-2-94, Kings Lynn, Norfolk. Inv. :

J. Copsey.

Mrs. H. was walking home at around23 . I 0 when she spotted a white light inthe sky, stationary at first before mov-ing off over a nearby bridge. The lightdescended and Mrs. H. could now makeout an object shrped like a policeman'shelmet with a white light in the middleof it. The object remained motionlessfor about a minute before drifting offtowards the by-pass and out ofsight.

EVALUATION: possible helicopter.

++++++

94-212.

Date: 7 -2-94, Southampton. Inv.: A.Woodward.

Ufo Times

At around 21.15, Anne H. had juststopped her car on St. Deny's Road inSouthampton when she looked up andsaw a bright light which seemed to bejust falling from the sky. It was a singlewhite light which was lost from viewbehind some buildings.

EVALUATION: shooting star.

++++++

94-213.

Dare'. 22-2-94, Menstone, Leeds. Inv.:D. Sigsworth.

Apparently, at around 19.45, Mr. and

Mrs. G. observed a strange light overReva Hill. The light was described as

descending slowly and looking like abig headlight. It was very bright, andboth these n itnesses and other car driv-ers pulled over to watch it before thelight simply blinked out.

EVALUATION: possible flare.

++++++

94-214.

Date: 22-2-94, between Linwood andLissington, Lincs. Inv.: R. Millen.

At 19.30, Mr. S. was driving betweenthe villages ofLinwood and Lissington,when high in the sky in ftont of him, he

observed a triangular arrangement oflights flying in an easterly direction. Hepulled the car over and watched thelights until they were lost from vicw inthe distance. There were 9 lights in totalufiich seemed to form an equilateraltriangle.

EVALUATION: aircraft.

++++++

94-215.

Date: l0-3-94, Brinkloq W. Midlands.Inv. D. Bames.

u

Marion was in bed at around 02.30when she was startled by a tremendous

sound like "a hundred lorries" alongwith a "whooshing" noise and a beep-ing sound. Car alarms went offoutsideand Marion got out ofbed to take a lookat what was happ€ning. As she lookedout ofher window, she observed a mass

of lights (coloured) in a huge circularformation. Moving away from the win-dow to obtain her spectacles, the noise

ceased and the object was no longer inview. The next day, her neighbours toldher they also had heard the noise.Brinklow is located near Bagirgton air-port and David Barnes telephoned therethe next day (Marion is his mother-in-law) and was told that the object was acargo plane.

EVALUATION: aircraft. (Some cargoplane that can set olf car alarms andmalre beeping sounds! I don't think Iwould lilce to live in BrinHow! - Ed).

++++++

94:216.

Date: l8-3-94, Cropwell Bishop, Notts.Inv.: R. Millen.

On the night in questioq Mrs. O. wasunable to sleep so she got up to look or.tt

of the window. Upon doing this, she

observed a number of large, grey/whitediscs, all ofwhich were stationary in thesky. The discs did not move nor did theydisplay any other lights and were vis-ible until Mrs. O. had viewed them longenough.

EVALUATION: astronomical objects.(such as? - Ed).

++++++

94-217.

Date: indeterminate'94, Nordelph,Norfolk. Inv.: J. Copsey.

At around 06.00, Sharron W. had justbeen to the toilet and was getting back

12into bed when she noticed a red andwhite lights in the sky. The lightsdropped out ofthe sky before coming toa halt. Shanon went and got her l0-year-old daughter to view the lightswith her. which seemed to be moving inhalf a circle and they just went out.

EVALUATION: insuficient data.

++++++

N.I.C. MEETING

The next meeting ofthe National Inves-tigalions Commiftee (NIC) is due toake place in London on November 6thI 994. However, I have had a number ofrequests to move the venue, at leilstonce a year, to a location in NorthernEngland, thus enabling our northeminvestigalors a better chance ofattend-ing. With this in mind, I would appreci-ate any ideas on where such a meetingcould be held (Iow about The SeftonHotel, Sefton Park Liverpool? - Ed).lfyou would like to help organise andNIC meeting near you, then please con-tact me at my home address.

Allergics and AlicnsThe Wsitatio n Exp e rie nc e :A n E nviro nme ntal H e alt h

Issueby Albert Budden

This work presents for the first time,b completely novel approach to theunderstanding of alien contacVab-duction experiences.

Budden's investigations showd howall abductees develop electricalhypersensitivity after a major elec-trical event, and undergo the CE4experience as a response to electri-callelectrronic pollution.

AUergies and Aliens is availablefrom: Discovery Times Press, 270Sandycombe Road, Kew, Surrey.TWg 3NP. Price f5.50 tnc p&p.

MAGONIA EDITORIALTEAM DIVERSIF'Y BY

INVENTING AWALKING FRAME FOR

DRUNKS.

It would seem that our team fromMagonia saw the market potential forsuch a device after their last drinkingsession at their unoffrcial meeting placeat a pub in Dreary Lane. Apparently,Big, Bad John Rimmer did not arrivehome thal night and woke up in a localpark covered in mud, causing theAetherius Society to speculate that hehad been abducted by aliens! However,Rimmer and his colleagues struck upona solution to inebriation after seeingmany ofBUFORA's Council having torely upon zimmer fiames to get them tothe last ACM. "Why not," said Big,Bad John, "adapt these zimmer framesso that casters are mounted at the end ofeach leg and a cloth seat fixed abouthalfivay up. All the drunk has to do isstep inside the fiame to steady himself,so that in the event ofhis lmching, th€frame will keep him upright yet con-tinue in motion because ofthe casters.

Furthermore, ifthe drunk falls over, he

will land up on the cloth seat, wlth hisfe€t trailing behind him, with motionyet again ensured due to the casten. Onthese principles, the drunk is ensured ofa safe arrival at his destination."

It is rumoured that Magonia teammember, Des O'Connor, has patented

this device and expects to derive a great

deal of money by selling them outsid€pubs at closing time. Rimmer, to hiscredit, has even decreed that BUFORA'sCouncil will receive l0% ofthetakingsin order to finance its operations flow-chart.

Sowce: Judith Jaaftr (my minder).

++++++

.ALIEN ACKNOWLEDGE-MENTCAMPAIGN' ATTEMPTS TORAISE AWARENESS OF THE UFOPRESENCE.

The organisers ofthis campaign.OPERATION RIGHT TO KNOW(ORTK), mounted an 'Are You Aware'lobbying of the MOD and House ofCommons on 23rd May this year.

2l peopletook part on the day andeveryone had a thoroughly good time (lbet the police had their work cut out forthem in controlling the crowd! - Ed.),with considerable public interest, bothat the MOD Building and the Com-mons. Media attention. especially at theCommons, exceeded expectations,u,here inten iews were conducted.

Radio coverage was especiallygood, including Radio 5 (live), Radio 4(You and Youn - recorded) and RadioI (live). BBC local radio covered itquite well (8 regional stations broadcastinterviews onthe day - confirmed); also3 commercial radio stations covered it.including Capital. In Yorkshirethe ven-ture was covered in the opening it€mson the 7.00 am radio news. with theheadline 'UFOs, no laughing mafter!'Karen Douglas conducted an interviewfortheBBC World Serv'ice (Radio Rus-

sia), which was translated and broad-

cast to Russia!

Illuslrutiqn 0n next puge.

Ufo Times

ufo Times l3

" nfiffitr,ri;'"T,?i,1.;;il:

WHATYOUCAIYDO-OPERATIONLETTER

SWAMP

This project was introduced to askas many people as possible to *rite totheirownMP (l{ofio' Pip Squeuk' JohnMajor? God save us all! - Ed.) ukingfor comments about the 6 points in the'Are You Aware' document and try andpin them down on the issues; particu-larly the Belgian point. We have tomake them understaod that the UFOissue is for real, to try to make theminterested enough to begin asking ques-tions and to get overto them thar THEIRright of accsss to information is beingimpeded. Ifyou want to move the sub-ject on, please inform everybody of'Letter Swamp'.

More infbmation about AAC canbe obained by writing or phoning thefollowing address:-

THE AAC, 20NEWTONGDNS.,RTPON, N. YORKS. HG4_lQF, Tet:0765{02898.

+++++++

BUFORA's 1995 INTERNA-TIONAL UFO CONGRESS, entitled:'UFOs - EXAMINING THE EVI-DENCE', will take place over the week-end ofAugust 26 & 27 1995. A fiill listofspeakers and prices will be includedin a future issue of UFO TIMES. Any-one requiring furtherdetails before then,or aryone (especially from overseas)wishing to present a paper should write(enclosing a SAE) to: Philip Manrle, l,Woodhall Drive, Batley, W. yorks.,wFlT-7SW.

WITNESS SUPPORT GROUP COORDINATOR RESIGNS.

Ken Phillips, coordinator ofthe WSG forthe last 3A years, has resigned toallow him to devote more time to editing the U.T. The new coordinator i, b"o.g"Spurgeon, a member of the WSG, rvho has volunteered to run the group 6nBUFORA's behalf. Anyone wishing to know further derails about the WSG'sactivities must now contact :

From the Morylebone Mercury,2nd June, 1994.

George Spurgeon,lE, Marie Lloyd House,Wenlock Barn Estate,Murray Grove,London, N1-7PU.Tel: 071-251-1690.

l4

II{SIDETHESEA

SHADOWDr. HarleyA. Byrd

For the past half<entury, the U. S.

Govemrnent has developed many se-

cretive projects like the Polaris andBullpup missiles, the Stealth Fighter(F111-F) and the Aumr4 known toinsiders as 'Black Projects'. Only theMilitary Appropriations C ommittee and

other select personnel are priry to thebillions of dollars that have gone intothese ultra-secret projects, and the Sea

Shadow is no exception.

The first public knqwledge ofthisstealth on stilts came to light in the San

FranciscoNews onNovember4th 1982.

A briefitem onthe impending departurefrom the Todd Shipyiuds of a large,

black barge-ship known at that time as

the 'Hughes Mining Barge'. This tre-mendous, floating dry-dock was the

4,700-ton vessel was originally built bythe U.S. Government under the aus-pices ofthe CIA. This proj€ct is the Sea

Shadow and was originally built in theearly 1970s and has been in mothballsfor sometime until recently. This CIAproj€ct has since come out of mothballsin an attempt to recover a Soviet nuclearsubmarine, and at the time we contactednavy officials, they statedthat it was notgoing to be used to go after the sub.

Our interest was now piqued inthat we now had to mission of findingout the real purpose of'Sea Shadow' , orAKA Mining Barge; sometimes referred

to as the 'Stealth on Stilts'.

Ufo Times

Much has been revealed on thesuper-secret stealth but very little isknown about this mysterious tloating-barge. Recently, the senior editor ofEVS Productions showed us some foot-age ofa strange barge they had videodoffPoint Mugu, north of Los Angleles,whilst on a brief sailing venture. I wasastonished to see the Sea Shadow sail-ing along ar a fast clip ofabout 30 knots.I mentioned to the editor, "Isn't that alittle fast for a commercial barge?" Herreply was, "It sure is, and.it isn't a sub-chaser!"

The construction of the Sea

Shadow took place inside th€ bargeapparently between 1983 and 1985.

Night tests were conducted in 1986,

with the barge keeping the ship undercover for repairs and replenishmentduring daylight. The tests were sus-pended in 1986 and not resumed untilthe ship was unveiled from a cloak ofsecrecy in 1987. The shaping ofthe Sea

Shadow in its twin-hull configurationgives us a clue to the intentions and past

experiences ofthose who built it.

In May 1993, the Sea Shadowwent into action looking for two miss-

ing, Icelandic fishing boats near the

mysterious Siensfell (skull) region ofthe eastem peninsula oflceland, where

numerous UFO and E.T. had been re-poded. Crews of the Icelandic fishingboats are apprehensive and disturbed bythe UFO activity under the surtbce ofthe Icelandic waters. Also, white, tubu-lar, fluorescent-type lights appear in thenight skies and hover above the fishingvessels. The U.S. Information Agencywas angry about information leakingout about the Sea ShadowfuF0 con-nection and put a halt to the sirpply offurther data.

Having sen'ed in the Pentagon fora number of years, I contact€d sources

in Washington and came up with thefollowing infornation: Sea Shadow,now fully opemtional, addresses itselfto all underwater, investigative situa-

Free EnergtContinued hom page seven

(in other words, how much coal you canget in one shovelfirl) depends upon the

nrrnber of trapped electrons you have inttr trapped fiee electon gas in the collec-tor, and the potential gradient you apply tothose rapped Coulombs to potentialise

them.

REFERENCES

23. lt ls easy to test this. Cormect several

different wiles to a single source ofpcden-tial gradient. With respect to ground, the

end ofeachcne ofthosewires hasthe same

potential gradient asdoes the original source

with respect to gound. If you connect l0wires to a singl€ ' 1 00 volt' potential gradi-

ent source, you will have ten 100-voltpotential gradients appear. You can use

each of these l0 potential gradients as a

primary source. From each of these newprimary sources, you can branch I 0 more,

and norv you have 100 potential gradient

sources. you can treat each ofthese 100

new sources now as a primary source. Toeach one you can add a switcher, collec-tor ard external load and drive all 100

loads. Or instead, you can put I 0 switcher/collector/extemal load circuits with each

ofthe I 00 new primary soutces and power

all I ,000 external loads. Energy/potentialis free fiom any source so long as you donot demard power from the same source.

2'. Per Whittaker and Ziolkowski, thisVPF exchange - from consideration ofitswave asp€cts - consists of a harmonicseries of bidirectional waves.

ta we are easily permrtted to have fieeenergy and violate the 'local energy con-servation law for a closed system'. This is

because the system is not closed and so

instead we must apply local energy con-servation for an open system with a hid-den source. In any giventime interval, the

energy taken (scattered) from the system

as Extcmal work carmot exceed the sum

of the unscattered trapped energy thatwas in the system initially and theunscattered energy that flowed into the

system during that time interval.

To be continued in the next issue ofU,T.

tions and is the latest design of ourmilitary avante-garde arsenal. The two,thin struts which supports its main hullstand on a pair ofsubmerged, torpedo-like pontoons in what is known as asmall, waterplane-area, twin-hull con-figuration ofa swath design which has

long been known for its exceptionalstability in heavy seas, but in the case ofSea Shadow, there are important, addi-tional advantages.

Firstly, the knife-like struts slic-ing the water's surface reduces the waketo almost nothing. Secondly, the Noiser(sic) components is diesel electric, so

theprobable layout is one electric motorin each pontoon, powered by one ormore diesel generators up above. Pho-tos show exhaust venting between theswathhull's struts, wheretheheat wouldbe masked from inflared sensors.

Swath also appears to help in evad-ing radar because it provides a widebase of support from which the ship'ssides can slope inward. Normally aship's sides are nearly vertical and pro-duces a bright radar echo calleda broad-side flash which is easy to hone in on.Unfortumtely, all this capability has alooming price. To look at the Na\y's'Tagos 19' swath surveillance ships,which are said to incorporate lessonsffom Sea Shadow, illustrates the trade-

Ufo Times

offs: built to torv sub-hunting sonararrays at high latitudes, where punish-ing seas damage equipment and wearout crews aboard conventional ships,the 3379 Tagos-l9s are the largest U.S.made s\ ath vessels known. Accordingto naval architect, Joseph McMahon, atMcDermott Intemational, where thevessels are built, the swath configura-tion are well suited to the prototypeknown as the Tagos-Ig, whose mis-sions suffered weight+arrying excesses

and calm water speed limitations whichwould be aproblern in later models likethe sleeh dark stealth-on-stilts. Look-ing at our highly secretive photos ofSea

Shadow, Mr. McMahon commented tous that the in$'ard slant, or dihedral, ofthe hull struts would damp out heavingmotion in hea\ry seas by creating verti-cal drag. It also required a nightmarishlycomplex structue, and he stated to usby phone that it's outstanding,hydrodynamically, but it's awful forthebuilder.

After the intervierv, we were putupon by colleagues, John Lear and AlBierlik, as to the actual usage of Sea

Shadow. We said that the Neval Intelli-gence Community were well aware ofthe project and ofthe aforementionedincidents off Iceland, but dismiss suchstories as rubbish. We then calledCHINFO (Chief ofNaval Intelligence),

l5my former work place, and they indi-cated that some activity was going on inthe Icelandic and Arctic regions as wellas Sea Shadow, AKA Stealth Ship wasoperating in that region. the ship wastowing an instrument barge loaded withunderwater detection devices thoughtto be monitoring SUFOACTIVITY (sic)in that area. The barge had been moni-toring SUFO (sic), underwater, miningoperations when the stealth ship disap-peared, and the lalest repofts are that therecovery ofSea Shadow is ongoing.

We now have reliable data that thestealth ship, 'Sea Shadow' was operat-

ing in the IcelandicNorwegian watersand has sophisticated instrumentationon board and has been monitoring un-derwater, alien (UFO), operations andbases. We have fi:rther news mediareports from Denmark as late as Octo-ber 1993 thar NATO ships are tmcking,and have under surveillance, UFO aliencraft sinthe area of IcelandandNorway.

We hope this information will beofhelp to your readers and the public ingeneral, since the black projects, suchas Sea Shadow, the Auror4 the Stealth,the Blackbird and other dark projects bythe U.S. Govemments, should not bekept from the public.

l6

UFOSNAPSHOTS

FLYING SAUCER SEENOVER TOTTEI\HAM IN

NORTHLONDON

DOCTORMYSTIFTED BY ASTRANGE OBJNCT

HOVERING I\EAR HIS HOMEINBRUCE GROVE

What do you think about this re-port? It was made at a time ['hen therewere several reports of a brightlyJitsaucer-shaped object over North Lon-don. The repoft file was submifted toAerospace expert, Roy Dutton, for hisevaluation. According to Roy, this re-port had a significant value with respectto this spatio-temporal Earth orbits, andthus he has designaled the object to beof an unknown technology; probablyexhaterrestrial. Now read the witness'account below:-

I was sitting in my room readingfor my exams - I had opened the win-dow and drawn the curtains fully be-cause I was rather hot - when out ofthecomer of my eye, through the windowI saw a yellowish flash of light, Iike acigarette lighter, as if rising ffom thegpund. With the recent spate of IRAattacks in London, I thought it might beyet another attaclq but there was nosound and, as I looked for signs offireand smoke, there was a sprinkling oflights, yellowish and white, in an up-ward direction. Following the flash, adarkish grey object, and possibly twosmallerones, moved upwards and side-ways.

On closer inspection, I realisedthey were not smoke puffs and went tosit do{,n, but to my utter surprise, whenI looked out again for smoke or fire

Ufo Times

ftom the 'blast', the grey object had notonly moved closer, but was also glow-ing eerily. It was disc-shaped. luminousfrom all parts, with two flashing lightson top and one below. The whole struc-ture, which was quite large, was aboutas long in diameter as a Boeing com-mercial jet and hovered motionless andsoundless overthe rooftops. I phoned afriend off West Green Rd. to ask if hecould see it, but his landlady said hewasn't in. I tried calling 150 for advice,but they were not helpful. I then wentoverto my neighbour's flat in the samebuilding and started knocking. When heopened (the door). he was entertainingtwo visitors so I told him to have a lookoutside to see ifhe could see what I wasseeing! He did and started shouting,"lt's a UFO, it's a UFO!" His visitorsalso came to look and stared in awedsilence. I asked him for a camer4 but hedidn't have one.

I ran downstairs and onto BruceGrove and asked someone the time; itwas 10.20 pm. After I had watched itmove out ofsight to my left, I couldn'tsee it from the street and things lookednormal. so I went back home.

SOURCE: KEN PHILLIPSI t ** * * +* + * t * t * t,l t 'l * * t

DOWNUI\DER

WHATWASFLYINGAROTII\D BROOME,

WESTERN AUSTRALIA, ON8th AUGUST 1992?

by: Keith Brsterlield

A littletime has now elapsed sincesome rather interesting happeningsaround the remote town of Broome inNW, Westem Australia. Thepassage oftime has allowed us to piece togetherthe following account.

The 'Western Australia' newspa-pet dated 15th August 1992, broke theinitial story. A telephone interview wasconducted, that day, by Brian Richards,

investigator for the Perth-based'UFO Data and Collection Centre'.

Brian's interview confirmed thatthe chief witnesses lived on the WillieCreek Pesrl Farm, some 37 Km north ofBroome. Chris Davis and Lella Baileywere out fishing on a clear night. At20.20 local time, they saw a white cres-cent, quarter-moon-shaped object flyoverhead. It was travelling from theSSE, heading to the NNE. The object,flying vertically with the crescent pointstrailing, moved ar a steady pace. Itseemed to be enveloped in a mist. thushaving a "frrzzy" appeamnce overall.

Both witnesses described hearinga faint, droning sound. Total duration ofthe observation was at least one minute.

Sally Bennet, a researcher for theMelboume, Victoria-based'Phenom-ena Reseaxch Australia' group, locatedand interviewed a Mr. George Read.George had been out to sea near Cou-lomb Point, some 60 Km north ofBroome. He heard adistant, high-pitchedsound approaching from the south, thenover trees, he saw a boomerang (cres-cent) shape. In colour, it was a bright.white-golden hue and its angular sizewas estimatedto be3-4 times that ofthefull-moon. Overaperiod of2-3 minutesit travelled north and was lost to sightover the horizon.

Sally also located a penon at CrabCreek, 3 Km south of Broome, whoheard a droning sound and then sightedabrilliant, white object withgold edges;it had a crescent shape and was envel-oped in "fog."

John Kemott. a resident ofBroomewho conducts a postal run through thearea, came across another person whohad also been at Crab Beach that night.Kerry Hogan described seeing, at about21.00, a crescent-shaped, yellow in col-our object which was travelling veryfast from the south to the north.

In addition, John interviewed antan called Norm Archer who is work-

Ufo Times l7ing with the Aborigines at Sunday Is-land, 180 Km NNE of Broome. He,three otheradults and fourchildren werecamped in a valley on Sunday Islandwhen a large, yellow light, the shape ofa crescent moon, standing upright,cruised above the contour of a hill infiont of them.

It (the objec| was said to be ayellow colour, with a mist of cloudaround it, and this was especially radi-ating from the inside ofthecrescent; thecrescent'homs' weretrailing. Itseemedto be low in the sky and he estimated itlooked to be about five times the size ofthe full-moon. Theobject moved east towest along the contour ofthe hill.

As it came to the end of the hill, itturned, and looked then like a yellowpencil, as it had a shape like a flat,crescent-shaped biscuit. It then shotstraight up in the air and vanished.

Other witnesses of apparently thesame crescent-shaped object included aMrs. Sarah S. and her husband, whosighted it about 20.30 ftom a positionhalfway between Port Hedland andBroome. Also, a Joy Walker and PamAnthony, staying at the Broome Cara-van Parh saw it between 19.30 and20.00. Finally. a group at the Fort SmithCaravan Park declared they also hadseen it between 19.10 and 20.00.

Although suegestions were madeas to the identity ofthe object causingthese reports, the remote locality, thedumtion of the observations and theunique description ofa crescent shape,misty in appearance, in the end drew a

blank as to colventional explanations.

REFERENCES

l. Benner, Sally. ' 'Moon qescent mysteryover Broome, W.A. North-West." UFO andPIIENOMENA. No. 8,D@. 1992, W235-241.

2. Kemott, John. Penonal communicationsto UFODAT,\CC in Perth.

3. I rF( )DAl A( 1 . Perlb. PersoMl inler-views.

BuforaUFO newfile

Top Jlight UFO cover. WO is spotted by police. Mystery light in the slE.Arlvertiser. Daily News.Evening Echo. IYestern Morning News.Echo.

Hoax or not? Net and UFO in near miss. ETS:Are they here? UFO seen.Evening Argts. Il/estern Morning News.The News .Sunday

Keep in touch with all the latest UFOstories iin the press, from the UK andabroad

Subscriptions:f.7 for membersf8 for non-members.Overseas on request.

Published bi-monthly, all backare available enquire for pricesAvailable from:

BM BUFORA,London WCIN 3XX.

lssues

UJb Times

Readers WriteExpress your views by sending your correspondence to:

The Editor, UFO Times, tsM BUFORA,London, WCIN 3XX.

THE CHRISTIAN POINT OF }'IEW

Dear Sir,

This lett€r is a response to the articleby G'ordon Millington in the March/April1994 edition of UFO TIMES concemingthe identity of extraterr€sFial beings.whether tbey ar€ literal, biological, non-human entities, or fallen atgels as pre-dominandy labelled by Christian theolG.gias.

It is quir€ a coincidence that thisarticle was the first article I came across inmy first vielving of 11.T. because I ampresently worting on a rescarch projectentitled'Approaching Apocalypse'. Muchofmy work is a collection ofover-the-yearsresearch in the areas of European integra-tion, the Middle East crisis, developmentswithin Russia and their implications on theNew World Order relative to Bible proph-ecy.

The very first chapter of my book isdevoted to some unorthodox, rheologicalviews, mostly dealing with the spiritualrealm. This includes the theory that therewas a pre-adarnit€ race thaf was ruled byLucifer before the time of Adam, aad tt"ttbe Sons of God in Cenesis 6 were fallenangels wto hfilaat€d the huma-o race inorder to genetically corrupt matr's lineageeo that the Messiah could not har€ beenbom. A section of this chaptff is alsodevoted to UFOS as I have sou!fit a linkbetw€en the theories of Atlantis - whichStan D€yo sufficiently proved in his book'The Vindicator Scrolls' showing Atlantisto have existed in the Middl€ East and notin the Atlantic Ocean - and UFOs. Refer-ence is also made to a Tibetan documentvihich passed into the bands of AdolphHitler called 'The Secret Doctrin€', whichalso spoke of flying craft during theAdantean Age. The validity of such a sce-nario is referredto in the 'Branton Report',and may be on€ of tle tools from whichst€mmed Hitler's Aryan race doctine.

The belief that aliens are fallen an-

gels in a form designed iu deceive man intothinking that he is not alone in the udvers€has been tbe common viewpoint in Evan-gelica.l and Pentecostal Cbristianity. How-ever, I myself, once being of like mind,heve had to do some serious revaluating ofth€ extraterrestrial phenomenon and its re-lation to Biblical theology. In expecting tofind massive contradiction between thetwo viewpoints, I was surprised to find thafBible Theology, through a counter argu-med, exposes flaws in the view lhat extra-terrestrials are fallen angels. It is not withinme to state with authority that fallen angelscannol imitate aliens, or have done so,hiblically speaking: the enemy's snare isalways one of deception. The theory thatfallen angels are imitating aliens so that theworld could be prepared into a New WorldOrder, uniting as one against potential,outside threat, is a valid proposal*. However, for this s€ction, I intend to exposesorne of the flaws in the fallen angevalientheory.

( Forfurther backgrcurul reading ofthis subject the reader is referred to MarySeal, 60, Fallowfield Rd., Orchard Hills,Walsall. W. Midlands. WS5-3DH. - Ed).

Firstly, rcports ofabductees r*{ro weretaken aboard UFOs and subjecrcd to pain-fuI, physical examination stale, in the ma-jority of cases, that they were aHuctedagainst their own free will. Theologically,it is inconceivable wirhin God's laws oftheuniverse thal fallen angels are ganted witbthe freedom to abduct human beings at willfor their orl'n puposes. This would destroythe concept of a sovereign God as it wouldpur into jeopardy the very conc€pt ofmanand free will. The spiritual world, whetherthe good side or the dart side, is purposelyunveiled from the human race. Contactwith this world is only made when humanswillingly use their oun free will to do so.

Such is the principle ofthe link between thernaterial and the spiritual world.

Secondly, is the principle of dimen-sional change between the mat€rial and tlespiritual world. The results ofalien autol>

sies, the description ofalien bodies rccov-ered in crash-retrieval s and the ex i stence ofalien genetic engneering and cryogenrctechnology in New Mexico, suggests thataliens are literal, biological beings made ofmaterial substance, although different innature in some respects to human beings,Fallen angels do not have the pnwer ormeans to become biological beings. Spiritsmostly present themseh,es through posses-sion ofa biological body or physical sub-stance. but cart never become a genuinebiologicaVmalerial body; this would ruleout real, biological aliens being deceitfrrlspirits. Those theologians who use the ar-gument thal lhc Soru ofGrxl in Gcncsis 6:2and Job l: 6,2,1 had the ability to changestat€ into litera.l hrunan beings which, whilecorrect, becomes incorrect in using this tosupport the spirivalien belief today.

The implications ofth€ existence ofalien species does have a frmdamental im-pact on Biblical theology which cannot beoverlooked. The general subconscious.theological view on man in rclation to theuniverse is that he is the rmique creationwithin the universe and thus this leaves noroom for the existence ofanotber civilisa-lion which would cross-collide with thevery doctrine of redemption and how thedeath of Cbrist relates to another alienspecies. However,I feel thar Biblical theol-ogy can co€xist with tbe newrevelations intoday's modem world, just as it rvas rvhenscience taught Christianity during the I\4e-

diel'al times that it $'as the Sun and not thcEarth which was ar the centre of the solarsystem.

The theories of pre-adarnite civilisa-tions and UFOs are indeed mysteries. How-ever, while the 'picture' , or message, to theAdamic race is the bulk ofGod's revelationfor our bercfit, tbe fiarne, or'mysteriesoutside the Adamic race' also plays its part,for one cannot have a picture without afrarne. There is a naterial world which weinhabit, and th€rc ar€ other dimeosiooswhether we like it or not. The ft.llen angeValien debare is a moot point permeatingreligion and ethics; the outcome is whatvou take as definitive and whal you con-sider not definitive. Thankfully it do€s noraffect the soul ofchri stianity, whi ch i s thatman was bom in sin and thus needs to beredeemed for which, in my opinion, JesusChrist came. The UFO mystery is justanother mystery within the unique andgrand creation ofcod.

Lastly, I would like to make refer-ence to several factors which I am in theprocess ofacquiring data. Firstly, concem-ing the super technology which IJFO pro.duction is based on . Negative mass and itsimplications seem to be part oflhis tecbnol-ogy and I would like to know more aboutthe theory behind it and how negative masscan be produced. Secondly, in warchingWilliam Cooper's 'hoject Red Light II',he referred to the UF:OS crossing time zoneswhen they suddenly disappeared in flight,only to rcappear moments later. What aretime zones and how are they defined?Thirdly and lastly, do you have any infor-mation pertaining to Project Aquarius andProjecr Plato.

Sincerely submitted,

Lesmond Fearon,8, Rostrevor Gdns.,Ilayes,Middx. ttB3- lAH.

(Ed's umment: ),ou na)r $'ell becorrect in your overall assessnenL butpersonally I buy the idea of Charles Fon$,ho vrote that "Mdn is properf, - hebelongs to somethin(". This concept tal-Iies wry well u,ith the 'norks of EustaceMul lins vhen he speaks of a se cre t bankingubal ha,ing a terible holtl oyer humanitl,(,,t,ho it regards as nothing mo re than a herdoJ talking t dttl(!)b int'enting v'urs. reto-Iutions, famine and mone', crises, ett., ullplunned to bing about u one-t+,orld orderand one-world religion in the rct-loo-dis-tent fitture. I commend his books to you:The Nationul (omntission lor .ludiciul Re-

form, P.O. Box I105, Staunton, V.4 24401,U. S. A. M1, ovn re commendation is that you

order 'The Curse oJ Canaan').

++++++

STEU.ART CAMPBELL ACCUSESM.{LCOLM ROBINSON OF

MISREPRESENTING THE FACTSOVER THE BRAIISBY CL,{RKE

PHOTOGR{PH

Dear Sir,

In UT29, Malcolm Robinson de-scribed a case where an aerial object wasphotogaph€d in south-west Scotland andhe dismissedmyexplanalion thar the objectwas a mirage of o distant mormlain.

Ufo Times

He refers to the photograph taken byBransby Clarke on l9th December 1979from Moffat; a reproduction ofthe photG.graph appearc as plate 3:3 in my book TheUFO Mystery Solved (1994), and a tuttaccount ofthe incident can be formd in TheJoumal of Meteorology (May/June 1987).

Robinson claims that the object u'asmoving. However, none ofthe observersreported any movement before the objectsbrank. Robinson also claims that the ob-ject was grey; in fact, the observers re-ported that it was almost as bright as Venus.

Robinson has not explained to me (orto your readers) why he dismisses my ex-planation, and I have not heard his explana-tion.

Yours faithtully,

Steuart Campbell.

(Etl's conment: you are very lucky tohaye retained the (larke photo for yourbook Steuan. because ifyou had frst sub-mitted the sqid photo to BUFOv4, itwouldhave been conf.scated and neyer seenagain!).

+++++++

WHY I BELIE\,T

Dear Ed.

Ron Bishop asks in UT28: "Why dothose who have never witnessed a UFOcontinue to believe in their existence?' ' Asanon-witness, this is why I believe in aliensand ttFos.

The universe in which we lire isestimaied to be o\€r l4 billion years old andis made up ofhundreds ofbillions ofgalax-ies, each containing millions of sta$. Howmany planets arc orbiting these stars $'ouldbe impossible to estimate. I for one cannotaccept that u€ are the only intelligent life inthis incredibly large universe. There areprobably thousands of intelligent civilisa-tions out tbere and it would be t)?ical ofman's zuperioristic nature to think other-rvise.

Because oftbe age ofthe universe, itis perfectly possible that some civilisationscould be many years ahead ofours. Look at

l9wbat man has achieved in the past 40 yearsand think of whar he will be capable of in200 years.

As for interstellar travel, p€ople donot think its possible because it takes us allour time to go to the moon, yet whd tleyhave to realise is that we bav€ ooly juststepped inlo space. A more advanced civi-lisation on another planet could tGar ajoumey from their planet to ours the sarneway as we treal a plane joumey from Lon-don to Nerv York.

Finally, a short word on Bill Dillon'sviews in UT29. He says: "Hrnnan con-sciousness is a form of energy and wherewas it before we were born?" He furthersiates: "It was not suddenly created at ourbirth, so where was it before then?" Well,sorry to disappoint you Bill, but it wascreated at th€ exact moment of our birti.Put simply, all rhings c.msciousness, senses,and emotions, etc. , emerged as soon as theenergy inthe man's sperm andthe woman'segg come together. As for when we expire,our energy di€s with us, just the same aswhen a battery is finished its energy ceasesto exist. There is no afterlife, heaven orhell. tn fact, ifthere was a heaven it wouldbe a very packed place since every creaturethat has lived on this planet would be thercas these are all sources of life.

Back to UFOS. people say they deSthe laws of physics. Well, they do degthese laws as rve know them, but it is alno*n fact tlat we only use a fraction ofwhat our brains are capable of. It has beenproved recently that tiny zub-alomic parti-cles exceed the speed oflight, yet one ofthestrongest beliefs in physics was thet noth-ing could travel faster than light.

Other questions asked are, "how canUFOs floatin mid-airand thenaccelerate atsuper-human speeds?" I'm sure everyonebas seen super-conducting magnets float-ing in mid-air. I am convinced that UFOsuse either this, or some other magneticprinciple to ajtain their flighr. As for rhegreat accelerations said to be impossiblefor any living entity to survive the G-forcesinvolved, let us not forget thrt: l)aliens mnol human, and 2) it is logical to assumethat UFO pilots are highlytrained individu-als equippedto withs.nd high accelerationsin the same way as our fighter pilots onEarth arc rrained for their higbly sophisti-cated crafts. I imagine the shorterthe accel-

20eration the higher the G-force that can b€

withstood. Anybody agee with me?

Allan Browr,Aberdeen.

Ed's comment: I don't know if l,ouhut e had the opportunity of watching' Her-etics' on TY, but one of the programmesconcemed Prof Laithwaite's principles ofanti-grur,ity. According to Lailhwdite, anti-gra'ity is cheup and eaq, lo prodtrce, al-thottgh the oil and airline cartels will pro b-ablj' tell you otheruise.

++++++

SWISS READER FINDS BE.{RDON'SARTICLE ON FREE ELECTRICAL

ENERGY 'SHOCKING"(ls Beardon inleaguewiththe 'Admi

ral', oue usks? - Ed-)

Dear Sir,

So Now 'The Final Secret of FreeEnergy' has been revealed, Mr. Beardonsays thar p€ople all over the I,orld bavebeen starvingjust because nobody had discovered this secret. And after 5 parts, whata disappointnent !

Mr. Beardon's strange definitions ofenergy, pot€ntial, force and so on, make

amusing reading but will certainly notchange the shape ofphysics. His basic ideaseems to be that by connecting a battery,one can charge up the elecfons in his"collector" without using any energy.When the load is then switched into thecircuit, the electrons, with their chargeglued onto them, go off to dissipate lheirenergy in the load. Basically a pretty goodmix ofvedous parts ofphysics stired up soas to become unidentifieble. His idees arenot correct, but a complete refutalion wouldtake up pages, so maybe just a couple ofsimple errors will serve as illustrations.

It is an observed fact that electrons donol obedientlymove tothe surface ofa wirewhen a voltage is applied, nor do electricalcurrenls flow only on the surface ofuires.Mr. Beardon has confused this with the'skineffect' ofveryhighfrequency signals.

Neither batteries tror tbe universehave "infinite" amounts ofenergy. Therecan nerer be anlthing that is infurite in afinite utfverse, in the same way that there

Ufo Times

cannot b€ an infinite number ofvisible stanin the sky, as otherwise the nigbt sky wouldbe infinitely bright. Sometimes I wonder ifpeople actually know what the word 'infi-nite' means in physics. (Does aryone?Ed.).

Let me try to visualise his theory inmore detail. Supposing I was to add acapacitor to the light ckcuit in a room,change the wiring somewhat and then flipthe switch quickly enough, would I get arefund from the electricity company at theend ofthe y6ar? (Certuinly not from JohnMajor's neu'll,pivatised monopolv! - Ed.).

Ever since I have been interested inwhat you might call the fringe ofscience, Ican remember reading articles about fleeenergy, about how Einstein got it all wrong,and set science back hundreds of years, andhow to build perpetual-motion machines.The problem isthe story is always the same:

usually the unfortunate inventor dies inoblivion (As did, I beliete, NicoluTesla! -Ed), or he gets murdered by the boss of apetroleum company who was scared oflosinghis profits (Tfuqt yyrs '1in 1fus p61t

ofMarconi, u,ere they? - Id.).l]Jany case,the world is left with a description of somewonderful invention which is somehowmissing the important part to make it work.With his use ofinfinite energysources, Mr.Beardon belongs to the perpetual-motionmachine club.

The main question is: does UFO re-search need the sort of rubbish thal Mr.Beardon is producing: And uihat is it doingin UFO TIMES, which represents a LIFOorganisation trying lo presenl a seriousimage of UFO research to the world? Howcome LIFO TIMES accepts such articleswithout at least showing them to a compe-tent person beforehmd? (Hult! That'll be

the L!q) v)het! Il LIF0M cdn get d ' 'comPttent peryon" to look at papers slthnitted tou.T.! - Ed. ).

The thing that worries me most is thatUFO TIMES is nol alone in going off inweird directions. This also seems to be thefashion in other U.K. UFO magazines. Itwould be a shame ifthis trend caught on asthe LI.K. has some very good researchers.

Yours sincerely,

David I. Norman.Switzerland.

Ed's <:omnent: Beunlon's arTicle v'usputinto U.T. at the behestofa IIFOu,itnessu'ho has researched the t:onspirao, aspectof oar vbject.lbr a mmber of yeurs. IIov-eter, whttt exoc ]'is the {:onnection be-tween UFOs and '-free' energj' Qfit exists),I can't really saf ince I'm unable to peerinto the minds of UFO v'inesses. In anyevent, it is dl$,qys pndefi to bear in ninclsome of the utterances made by scientistsabout certain things being impossible,.forexample: "Space travel is t6ter bilge."Nou, Iol lhe "serious inwge of UFO re-sesrch" attilrutable to BUFORA: it doesno serious reseorch at sll! BLIFOM is u'broad church', UFO club v,hich collects,but neyer dissemiutes, UFO reports untlevidence. If),ou don't believe nte, n), send-ing BUFORA a good UFO Jiln/photo Jbret'aluation: ),on vill net er see the sameagain, nor will 1'ort get .t report. PerhapsBUF0M should t:hange its name to theBndsh tlFO Confiscation Association. Iapol o gi se for shatteing your i I I u si ons abou Iour Association. P.S. don'texpectmeto he

in the editor's chuir qfter this issue nou, Ihat'e nade these remarks.

++++++

CORRECTIONSFROMSWEDEN

Dear Sir,

Your issue number 30 carried twoSrvedish investigation reports by Clas Svahnunder the headmg 'The European Dimen-sion', courtesy of Euofon News, No. 3,April l99l. Since tbe English translationswere first publi shed in early 1994, issue No.37 ofour AFLI Newsletter, this isan impos-sibility. The original reports (in Swedish)were from UFO Sweden's'LrFo-Aktuellt'.

I suggest that you credit 'AFLI Neu,s-letter' (and UFo-Aktuellt) for publishingthese reports, just as we credited 'UFOTIMES' for thrce "unknovn missile" re-ports published in the very same issue of'AFU Newsletter'. The editorial informa-tion on page 2 ofour newsletterencouragesreproduction "ifAFU Neu,sletter is refer-enced as your source."

Anders Liljegen,Editor. AFU Nervsletter.

THEXM{OBIOTICPRESENCE

by A-lbert Budden

INTRODUCTION

My booklet 'ALLERC IES ANDALIENS' outlined howthose individu-als who have undergone alien contact/abduction experiences are suffering fr oma syndrome known as electricalhypersensitivity and multiple allergyand that their experiences are symp-toms of this condition-

It is shown that the modem, globalphenomenon reported as a physical ab-duction by non-human entities is in factnothing of the sort, but rather, a vividhallucinatory perception as a drama-tised form ofout-of-body experience. Italso demonstrated how such neurologi-cal visions come about as a result ofalifelong exposure to electromagneticfields from a variety of environmentalsources such as transmifting radio andTV antennae, pylons, electrical sub-stations, mobile phone systems andlastly, but not least, geological lbults inthe Earth's crust.

It is during this period that suchindividuals become more and more eli-gible for an encounter experience and,significantly. the body and brain un-dergo an electrical initiation and aresensitisedto electrical fields in theenvi-ronment in the formative years by anexposure to a major electrical eventsuch as a lightning strike or electrocu-tion.

El€ctromagnetically active loca-tions (which can be easily plotted onmaps) are refened to as 'hot spots' bythe World Health Organisation, and suchplaces, in the long term, have an ex-

Ufa Times

tremely detrimental effect on the healthof those individuals who spend pro-longed periods of time in them. Theirsymptoms are described and cataloguedin AILERGIES AND ALIENS (ISBN:l-899071-00-8) and it was also shownhow the alien abduction or contac.t ex-perience is intrinsically linked to suchenvironmentally produced illnesses andlocations.

ENCOUNTERS: WELFAREMESSAGES FROI\T THE AODY

It was outlined how the content ofthe visionary experiences that such irra-diated individuals perceive reflect theclinical condition(s) they are sufferingfrom: e,g. as did an electrically hyper-sensitive girl who, after having devel-oped an overgrolvth of the yeastJikeinfection 'candida' in her vagina due tolong term exposure to electrical fieldsfrom nearby pylons, experienced anhallucination involving sexual inter-course with an alien being. Aaomaloussexual feelings can be induced by theelectrical stimulation ofthe septal areaofthe brain, and excessive sugar intakeis kno\r/n to feed candidg so in the samevision, she was expressly forbidden toeat sweets by an alien figure.

Such messages from the body viaimagery ffom the unconscious in theseexperiences are tlpical. It is clear thatsuch lifelike visions contain informa-tion in sometimes thinly disguised, sym-bolic forrn, which are messages aboutthe biological crisis in the body. Suchstates ofphysiological disorderare madeworse by levels of stress, as they toocreate dysfunctional chemical changesin the body, and in combination withnutritional, chemical and electromag-netic loads upon the system, such emo-tional pressure is a major contributoryfactor in precipitating what has beencalled a close encounter of the fourthkind in ufological parlance.

This is, as stated, anepisode wherethe individual undergoes a vivid andlifeJike experience ofan abduction byalien beings: sometime into an "alien

2tcraft".

THE IRRESPONSIBILITYOF f,TH ADHERENTS

The modern flying saucer mythol-ogy into which these experiercos aiE sltis widespread and is propagatedby manysane, qualified and intelligent people.The idea has caught the imagination ofso vigorously that even people in positions ofauthority continue to propagateintbrmation which they tixl must betrue. It is thmugh this tangled web ofmodem folklore, hearsay, delusioq mis-interpretation, wish-fulfilment, subli-.mated religion and downright fantasythat the clinical evidence presente{ cuts.

All abductees, as they have cometo be known, are suffering from a rangeofenvironmental illnesses and their ex-periences are a side-effect, albeit anintriguing one, oftheir condition. Let itbe said once and for all, there are noextraterrestrials, interdimensional trav-ellers or alien intelligences ofany kindinvolved in these experiences. Instead.there is the discovery ofa fascinating,but somewhat sinister, area ofstudy forpsychologists, psychiatrists, generalpractitioners, neurologists, counsellors,clinical ecologists or anyone who isinterested in this strange and bizarrephenomenon largely brought about byelectrical and electronic pollution whichoccurs as an unwanted side-effect ofourmodem, technological culture.

Such a stance will no doubt eamme the identity of a secret govemmentagent* who is working to keep the Truthffom society by many detuded indi-viduals in the world of ufology.

( According to the 'Elite' scripts,Albert i* a "government mole"! - Ed).

Nothing could be further from thetruth. I am a lone investigator with aninformal relationship with one othermedically-oriented researcher, Anne,Silk, who both fuels and shares myviews and discoveries and advises meon a consultancy basis. Believers in

22alien intelligences will no doubt iabelme as such an offrcial agent as theyprotect their belief-systems u'ith a vig-our which rivals religious fervour. Tothese individuals I say this:-

It is your misinterpretation ofthedarathat actively directs the attention ofthe abductees away ftom the centralissue here. This is the pressing danger

and demonstratively real hazard to thehealth and quality of life that abductees

are subject to. Such suffereN do notneed you fantasies: they need medicalattention. It is grossly inesponsible ofyou, in your ignorance, to propagat€ abelief system at the expense of theirhealth and well-being; forthis is exactlywhat you are doing.

XENOBIOTICS

The practical system explored inALLERGIES AND ALIENS is a wayof studying a range of bizarre experi-ences classified as visitations. Whilst itis arguedthatthe only 'visit' involved isthat of the unconscious mind on theconscious, as opposed to the involve-ment ofany kind of alien intelligencefrom other realms, it also demonstratesthat the human body identifies influ-ences abroad in the environment whichimpinge upon its cells and tissues as

being aliento its intemal chemistry andthe organic electrical activity of the

nervous system and brain.

These biologicallyalien infl uences

are artificial electrical and electromag-netic fields as electrically produced sig-nals and unintended leakages from theNational Grid in one form or another.The body and mind apprehends them as

totally ALIEN to its intemal electro-magnetic environment as such fieldsdestabilise its regulatory systems. These

arc the systems which affect glandular

function, neurotransmitters and the cen-tral and autonomic nervous systems,producing allergies and ftee radicals,

although this brief list of targets fordysfunction is by no means exhaustive;such environmental fields are thereforexenobiotic or alien to the body.

Ufo Times

When the electrically hlpersensi-tive reaches an acute end-state in his orher condition, the mind, which willhave already been drawn into deliveringcommunications about the dysfunc-tional state of the body's systems as

hallucinations or apparitions, will ex-tend these visions or visitations to pro-duce a more vivid and lifelike scenarioinvolving depictions of aliens. Typi-cally, these are experienced as enteringtheirhome during the hours ofdarknessand removing them to an alien realmwhere they are medically examined andopefirted on.

Physical injuries often remain af-ter such visionary depictions, and therehave been many commentators onalienabduction experiences who insist thatthese are the result ofa psychosomaticprocess where the body complies withthe vivid vision to produce appropriatephysical trauma. They comparethe stig-mata on the hands ofreligious visionar-ies rvith the physical marks and bleed-ing ofabductees, maintaining that it isthe same basic process at work; they are

wrong.

The type, extent, frequency, dis-tribution and incidence ofsuch injurieswithout the existence of belief beliesthis explanation. Such injuries haveoccuned outside ofalien abduction ex-periences whilst the subject is asleep

and are the various effects of electro-magnetic fields on the body.

Electrically hypersensitive indi-viduals irradiated during the long im-mobility of sleep in hot spot locationsproduce not only perceptions of an in-temal, virtual reality, but also physical,allergic reactions to the fields they are

exposed to.

One abductee vividly felt the gripoftiny, alien fingers on her wrist as she

was pulled and floated upwards fiomher bed by these apparent alien intrud-ers. She 'knew' it was a physically real

experience because in the moming she

had a red weal around the wrist which

eventually peeled likesunburn. She had

also been wearing a stainless steel watchand strap on the wrist. and being in an

electromagnetic hot spot caused by theintersection of three microrvave com-munication beams from local radiomasts, had suffered the effect of re-

radiation. This is where metal concen-trates the electrical field, rather like a

lens, which focussed them into the tis-sues around her vrist.

From this, and other similar ex-

amples of physical trauma, it is clearthatthe imagery ofthesealien dramas is

cued and is driven by the physical ef-fects ofthe fields upon the body.

Another electrical hlpersensitivesuffered electrical bums dueto herprox-imity to a microwave radio source andwhich took the form ofa row ofblistersalong her side u'hich she discoveredwhen she awoke. During the night, she

had an abduction experience where she

felt she was floated outofherbed, outofthe window and into an alien realm. ltwas here, as she lay on an elevatedsurface, that she experienced an alienapproach her with the intent ofincisingher abdomen with something whichlooked like a long, silver pencil with a

slim gas-flame coming ftom the end.

She was panlysed,but in defence, sum-moned all her strength and deflectedthealien arm so that the flame caught her

with a glancing bum on her side.

Numerous other examples ofphysical trauma in abduction experi-ences, or similar, apparent, alien con-tact, can be traced directly to thexenobiotic presence and effect of an

electrical or el ectromagnetic fieldsourceon electrically hlpersensitive individu-als.

There is, therefore, a bioelectrical/thermoelectrical mechanism rvhich can

explain the juxtaposition oflifelike ex-periences ofalien visitation and subse-

quent physical trauma.

Ufo Timcs

BUFORABUFORA CENTRAI, OFFICE

BUFORA Centrel OIfice will deal wiah all membership enquiries (No personalvisits plcase),

BM BUFORA, London, WCIN 3XX, Tet.: 0444 23671E (Answering Machine)

c0uNCIL 199,r-95Major Sir I'arrick wall. MC VRD RM (Rrd)Lionel E. Becr. FRASC.F.N. Koewsrub. CEng FBtSJohn SpencerAmold WesrSimon Rose

COUNCTI, MEMBERSJenny RandlesSinron RoseAmold WestMichaelWoorrenSrsan Manrle

23

EDTTORKen Phillips

16 Wedgewood WalkLondon

NW6 IXR

Assistant EditorChristine Williams

Rcccarch EditorSteve Gamble

Feature EditorPhilip Mantle

The pages of LFO firxss sr€ open toanyone wishing to contribute a pa-per. $ubmiseions can beor $upplied on 3"3.5" disc (MSDOS). All di*swill bercturnd.

(c) BUFORA Ltd 1994

Views expressed in any papers pre-sertd in WO Ttmes da not n€c.cs-sarily represent those ofthe Edftor orBTJFORA Ltd.

It is permissible for mernbers to usematerial in this publication for thoiro\ n percohal u$s,Fovid€d itis dofton a limitel basis. Where material isused for publication, acknowledg-mant should be given to BUFORAand the appropriate contributor.

WO Times isproduced and ilistrib.uted on behalf of BUFORA by In-formation Manegoncnt, 4?d RolandGardens, London, SW7 3pG. TeVFut 071-373-3432.

DIRECTOR OF TNVESTIGATIONSPhilip Mantle,I Woodhall D.ivc.Hcalcy Lane,WcsI Yorkshire.

I'RESIDENl':vlCE PRESIDENTIFOUNDER PRESIDEN TI

COUNCIL CIIAIRMAN:IION SECRETARY:TREASURER:

Manfrcd CassircrPhilip ManileClive PorrerRoben DiAbyPaulDoranConsuhants to Council: Ililary Evans. Ratph Noyes. Chrisropher l ancred-Lawson

MEMBERSHIP SEC-RETARYJames Dnnby

DIRT'CTOR OF PUBI,ICAIIONSMike Woo en.

(Address as Cen(rat Officc)'Iel:0352-7.1247:1

Crants arc availahlc (by referee) r,, anv lroup orindiviJual who wishc( ro Drnttssidatty iutFlilh their recea'ch. Syrnp\es should be serrt tollrc Dircctor of Publicari('nr

PRESS OFFTCERPhilip Manrle

NEWSCI,IPPING ARCIIIVEMichacllludson.

7l Kniahl Avenue.Canrerbury,

Keot.CT2 8PY

WTINESS CONFIDI'N'TTALITY'Ihe British uFo Research Associarion realises rhe irnponance of rrearing cases submir(ed lo theAssociarior by wirnes-ses as confidenriar. ln rhe righr of rhis, The BTJFORA iode of pracrice has beende vn€d_ and cmployed rhrougrrour rhe A *ociat ion ro- guarantee rhat lrr€ urmost care is taken when dealini$rttr wrlness per<onaldetails and case repon m:tterial.lr ir alv, rh€ poricy ot uFo nmes rrcr ro puhrish rhe narnes or addresses of wihesses who are nol in rhenuhrrc dornarn r he mareriar and nersonar dcrails or wirnesses who have been nubrished in rhe mediawrll be treated wilh care and empathy by the edilor+ip.

THE BRITISH UFO RESEARCH ASSOCIATTON I,IMITED (by guaranree)Fol'ljl-:d

. 1964. Regisrered office: B.M. BUFORA, London WCtN -tXX. Resisr€red in t ndon;

12349924. lncorfDraring rhe Irrdon UFO Research Association (tour ed ts59);nd rhe Brilish UFOAss(rciation (founded 1962).

AIMSL To encoorage, promole aId cooducr unbias€d scienlific rcssrch of ullidentined flying objecl (UFO)phcrornena throughout rhe United Kingdom.2. Tocollecl and disrminare evidencc and data relrring ro uniden(ified flying objects(UFOS).3. 'Io.co ordinare UFO research rhroughour rtrc Unit€d Kingdom and to co-oforaie wiitr ortrers engageain such research throughour lhe world.MEMRERSIIIP is open to allwho rupnon the aimsotthe arso(iationand whose appticat ion isapprovednv rne execurrve commflree Annri,.rinns, form\ and general inlormarion cii tre otraineil rromRUFORA s repistered office '

MEMBER SOCIEIIFJ & ASS(rctATE GROUFS tnctudes Brirain s otdesr UFO qroup, BFSB. 3()rchard Road, Coal Pir lten(h, Bristot. Avon, BStT ZtB. nssociare *roupi iniiude: TheN',nhan|ptonshire UFO Res€arch ( e re and Skyscan.

RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATTONT,IRECTOR OF RESEARCIIStephen Gamble,Address as Central Office

wFtT ?swThe Nalional lnverlisalions comilrirre --rgil1.l inverrigarion iniriarives across rhc Brirish.tstes and acrs ns an open fonim for any goup or individualinrererrdl in rh€ obieciive invesrication or rhe uro phenomen-,n. N tc metii"!.

"* ii.ri -.""a ,r'. "*;"y il;"il ":;;;r"iilli'rn".r,nss can rc orraineatrom rhc Nrcsec..rary. r-hr Nla is runded by Buioneana ty aoriarion zi HbuC uFo uo[rn e osir:-re:)l i- -"-*""'""':::?'::"o1":tf,:f :?jl*l:.: *lg1111..:il1i:ioJar

(subjecr ro rereree) who wishes ro iniriarc obje.ti"l '""."..i or rhc uFo phcno.nena. Dcrrirs or rhescgranls can b€ obt.ined from thc Dircc(or of Research.

MAIN UFO LISTBOOKS FOR SALE

Llsr A,/94SPRING

1994'

LIONEL BEER(SPACELINK BOOKS)115 Hollybush Lane

HAMPTONlrllddlesexTW12 20Y

* Additions to listALL ITEMS ARE IN STOCK . PRICES INCLUDE POSTAGE

POPAL4R PAPERBACKS*AUEN ENCOUNTERS b!, Dr David Jacobs. "SECRET LIFE- 09{t2) 33s pages. F6.55

AUEN LIASON by Timoltry Good. '1992 edition. lndex. 12 plates. 258 pages. e5./15AMAZNG UFO3 AND ALIENS by R Manhews. 1992 children's books. 126 pages. e t-soDIMENSIONS - A Cassbook of Alien Contact by Jacques Vall€e. 1988. lnd€x. 315pages.An EXPERIMENT WITH ALIEN INTELLIGENCE by'Larry Kingston'. 1991. G€neral. t12 pages.SKY CRASH by Jsnrry Randlss, B Bdler, D Streel. 1984. 1980 Rendlesham case. lllustrated. 385 pag€s.

*TRANSFORMATION - The Breakthrough by Whitley Strieber. 1988. 'Communion' soquet. 2S5 pag€s.The UFO CONSPIRACY by Jenny Bandles. Ths tirst 40 ysars. Rscomm6nd6d. ltlustrat€d. 24 c€lg€tr'.The UFO ENCYCLOPEDIA compiled by John Spencer. 1991. 16 colour platss. Usefut rof. 446 pag6.UFO8 - AFRICAN ENCOUNTERS by Cynthia Hind of Zimbabwe. 1982. Rsc'd. 8 platos. 240 pages.UFOs, PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE by Robert Emenegger. 1974. Mainly USA angle. 212 phes.

OUALITT PAPERBACKSABOVE TOP SECRET by Timotlry Good. Worlc,wide cover-up. Becommanded. 16 plates. 59o pages. 89.00ADVANCED AERIAL DEVICES REPORTED DURING THE KOBEAN WAR by Richarct Haines. lllusilraed. 80 pages. e6.95

*ALIEN IOENTITIES by Richard Thompson. '1993. Wids coverago. Rocommended. lndex. 505 pages. C16.ooTANGELS AND AUENS by Keith Thompson. 1991. Serious UFO work. Broad view. lndex. 295 pages. E7.N

The CIRCLE'iIAKERS by Androw Collins. 1992. circles and 'orgonB energy'. 70 b/w photos. 352 pages. es.zoThe COSttllC PULSE OF LIFE by Trevor Constable. Rev. 1990. Bio-UFos and orgone energy. 50 ptd€s. 4a8 pages. c'tg.ooEXTRA-TERRESTRIALS AMONG US by George Andrews. 1986. Rocommended baroain. fllustrated. 310 pag€s. e6.00FLYING SAUCERS - SERIOUS EUSINESS by Frank Edwards. 1966 classic, reprinred. tttuslrated. 318 pages. e5.@HOUSE OF LORDS UFO DEBATE ediled by John Michell. Hansard text ol 18 Jan 79. lltustrated. 115 pages. E3.so

iLIFE BEYOND PI-ANET EARTH by Janet & Colin Bord. 1991. UFOS and SETI. llluslrated. 238 pages. c7.7oLOOKING FOR ALIENS by Jenny Randles & Peter Hough. 1991. Ofi-b€at angles. lllustrated. 240 pages. Eg.so

*THE MOTHMAN PROPHEC|ES by iohn Keel. i99l edition. winged monstec in Wesl Virginia. 275 pages. Ct6.5O*PASSPORT TO MAGONIA by Jacques Vallee. 1993 odition of 1969 work. UFOS and folklor€. 8 plates. 3@ pages. e15.0o

SILENT INVASION by Ellsn Crystal. 1991. USA alien encount€rs. 16 illus pages.2OO pag6s.

*THE ONLY PI-ANET OF CHOICE ediled by Phyllis Schlemmer & Palden Jenkins. 1993. Channelling. ,too pages. f10.40UFOs OVER HAMPSHIRE AND THE ISLE OF WIGHT by Rob€rt Price. 1990. Local cases. 8 plates. 142 pag6. e6.40

c4.50e6.30c5.00e4.25t5.4587.75c3.80e2.95

!1.00

c8.50e2.50

e13_3s€4.00e5.50

c14.00e12.00e16.s0

144 pages. e10.00

UFO! OVER PLYMOUTH (booklel) edited by Bob Boyd. Devonshire cases. Diagrams. 34 pagos.

HARDBACKSAUEN UAISON by limolhy good. 1991. Popular UFO updata. Baroain. 8 plares. lnd6x. 250 pagss.AN EXPERIIIIENT WITH SPACE by Roben Morison. Vortex propulsion id6as. gelgqi& 62 pages.The GULF BREF?F SIGHTINGS by Ed & Frances Wahars. USA. 1990. 32 colour plates. 348 pages.

*MAJESTIC by Whitl€y Srrieber. 1989. Billed as a novel bassd on facl. Baroain. 315 pag6s.PERSPECTIVES by John Sp€ncor. 1989. Abduclions dept. 8 plates. Soecial baroain. 255 pages.PHANTOMS OF THE SKY.by Oavid Clarke & Andy Roberts. 1990. Wide-ranging. I plates. 204 pages.SCIENCE AND THE UFO3 Uy.tenny Randles & Peter Warringlon. 1985. 8 pld6s. lndex. 215 pa96s.SECRET UFE by Darid Jacobs. 1992. UFO abduciions at first hand, g€notic testing? 336 pages.UFOs AND HOW TO SEE THEM by Jenrry'Randles. 1992. ceneral. 100 photos including colour. Baroain.

I.ARGE HARDBACKS (A4 SIZE) . BARGAIN SELECTIONThe AGE OF THE UFO editsct by Peter Brookesmith (Orbis) 1984. Colour illustrations. 208 pages. c1O.OO

The ALIE WORLD (from Ths Unexplained). Black Cat edition. Colour illustrations. 95 pages. t4.so*UFO ENCOUNTERS editors: Jerome Clark & Marcello Truzzi. 1992. Colour illustrations. cood value. 128 pages. c8.00*UFO INVESTIGATION by BEuben Stone. 1993. Blilz edition. Good ten, well illusrated. 80 pages. c4.s5

UFOS: WHERE DO THEY COME FROM Black Cat edition. Colour illustrarions. 95 pagss. t4.50*WORLD ATI-AS OF UFOS edilsd by John Sp€ncer (UFOS, THE DEFINmVE CASEBOOI9. Recommended. 190 pages. e1o.0o

MAGAZINESFORTEAN TIMES rsmarkabb value tor money - latest issue - 1994. 68 pages. e.40SPACEUNK (UK) Four assorted issues published by L Beer. 1968-70. W€ll lllustrated. 32 pages. Quarto. Qggqlq e2.00SPACEOUEST (UK) 1978. 28 glossy pages. A4 size. Set ot lirsl three issues: e..@. #2 & #3 together: e1.00

UFO AFRINEWS €dil€d by Cyrnhia Hind. A5 size. #l-1988; #2-1989; #3-1990; #4-1991: #5,#6-1992; #7,#8-1993 Each E2.00

All. PflC€S hrcLltr)E FGT GE Al,tr) PACIONG: Please send payment with ord6r. Cheques and British Postal Orders should bs made payable

to lixd Aaar. USA dolllr ch.cks .nd dollar money orde6 are nol acceptablg - sorry! Foreign curency notes are sccapted at tourisl oxchang. ral63;plg.3! rllow Cl.00 lor b.nk commbrion. lnt6rnalional regislration o, insubnco b an optional sxtra al e2.50 and sometimes speeds d€livcry.S lrE PGf cEl 8ook3 msy bc collccted al London meetings ol BUFOnA o, lrom Hampton Village Antiquos, 76 Station Foad, H6mpton, Middlesex.

Fordgo arfrritGt! trc !!ked lo ldd 1096 to ihe qbovo prices to cover highe. postag€ p.ices.