Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
WHY NEW ?
High Retaining Capacity Due To More Area of Contact
Takes short time to engage and disengage the side retaining pin
No Chance Of Missing Parts
Less fatigue to operator
COMPARISION OF PARTS
S.NO DESCRIPTION OLD NEW
1. COST Rs /PIECE 15 1
2. MATERIAL FE410S FE410S
3. THK 4 3.15
4. WEIGHT (gms) 20 20
3D DIE DESIGN
CONSIDERATIONS:-
USED CATIA V5 FOR DESIGN
PROGRESSIVE TOOL BY 2 STATIONS
STD DIE SET WHICH IS IN SCRAP
COST AND CONSTRUCTION OF DIE
STRIP LAYOUT JUSTIFICATION
First Stop
Second Stop
Final Stop
1st STATION
2nd STATION
FEED DIRECTION
PPO
PREFERRED BECAUSE:-MORE STRIP UTILIZATION 75% (LESS SCRAP%)SIMPLE DIE CONSTRUCTION
COST JUSTIFICATION
ESTIMATION:- TOTAL DIE COST (MATERIAL COST, MACHINING
COST,LABOUR COST,TRY OUT COST and OH 10%)
INHOUSE: 49,150/-
OFF LOAD: 10,294/-
Cost Calculated by Off Load Basis
OLD PART :- Rs 15/- per Part (As Per SAP data)
NEW PART:- Rs 1 /- per Part
COST JUSTIFICATION
B.E.P: FOR 700 EX PARTS COST We Can Get The New Die(Break Even Point)
By Running for 2 hrs; we can get 2400Parts, which take ~4 years to
consume
Consumption of The Part per Month : 50 Nos
HIGHLIGHTS
• As cutting force is <10ton we can use our 150 ton tryout press for production due to less schedule on that press.
• we can get directly 3.15mm Thk sheet
• Approximately 30 Parts Per Min.
• Reuse of Scrapped Die set is Possible
Related Documents
